BACKGROUND: Manual thrombus-aspiration has proven to improve myocardial reperfusion during primary percutaneous coronary intervention. However, the adequate population for this approach has not been well established. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and patient selection for thrombus-aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention. METHOD: From July 2008 to February 2009, we included 183 patients submitted to primary percutaneous coronary intervention from eight Argentinean centers in a prospective ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) registry. Baseline characteristics as well as clinical and angiographic outcomes were compared among patients treated with and without thrombus-aspiration. RESULTS: Manual thrombus-aspiration was used in 20.8% of the patients. Baseline clinical characteristics were similar among patients treated with and without thrombus-aspiration. However, thrombus-aspiration treatment was associated with worse baseline renal function and greater baseline ST-segment elevation (thrombus-aspiration: 12.2 ± 7.7 mm vs. 10.2 ± 8.6 mm; P = 0.06). The thrombus-aspiration group had a higher rate of patients with grade 4-5 thrombus (86.8% vs. 49%; P < 0.01) and baseline TIMI flow 0 (thrombus-aspiration 63.2% vs. 40.7%; P = 0.03), greater vessel diameter (3.46 ± 0.5 mm vs. 3.12 ± 0.5 mm; P = 0.01), use of distal filter (13.1% vs. 0.7%; P = 0.04) and use of intra-aortic balloon (10.5% vs 3.4%; P = 0.05), as well as glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor administration (39.5% vs. 14.5%; P = 0.04). Debris was retrieved from 76.3% of the patients. Although the thrombus-aspiration group had higher CK levels (thrombus-aspiration: 3195.9 ± 2598 UI/ml vs. 1757.6 ± 1806.6 UI/ml; P = 0.02), the percentage of ST-segment resolution and final TIMI 3 flow did not differ between groups. The follow-up rate of major cardiovascular events was similar for both groups (thrombusaspiration: 21.1% vs. 15.2%; P = 0.36). CONCLUSION: Routine thrombus-aspiration in patients with STEMI is used in patients with higher clinical and angiographic complexity, leading to similar overall clinical results as those not treated with thrombus-aspiration.
Thrombectomy; Angioplasty, transluminal, percutaneous coronary; Myocardial infarction; Coronary thrombosis
