ABSTRACT
Tissue analysis results are interpreted by comparing them with nutrient standards; however, using universal standards may lead to a misleading nutritional diagnosis. This study aimed to evaluate the degree of universality of Kenworthy and DRIS norms for irrigated ‘Prata-Anã’ (AAB) and ‘Grande Naine’ (AAA) banana plants grown in two environments. The study was carried out using a database containing leaf nutrient contents and yield data of two farms located in Ponto Novo, Bahia State, and Missão Velha, Ceará State, Brazil. A reference population was that with yields above the average yield plus 0.5 standard deviation. Using a reference population, the mean, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation of nutrient content and dual nutrient ratios were calculated for each site × cultivar combination. To verify the homogeneity of variance among populations, F-test was used (p≤0.05). Means were compared using t-test (p≤0.05). Differences in climate and soil at each farm explain the high frequency of significant differences found between norms for each site. Kenworthy norms established for interpreting leaf nutrient contents of P, K, Ca, Mg, S, Cu, Fe, Mn, and Zn for ‘Prata-Anã’ grown in Ceará were higher than those in Bahia, while for N and B contents, the norms were higher in Bahia. This is due to differences in soil fertility and alkalinity affecting nutrient availability as well as non-nutritional factors. Kenworthy and DRIS norms for ‘Prata-Anã’ and ‘Grande Naine’ bananas grown in Ceará have higher variability and are greater than for those grown in Bahia. Norms are less convergent for ‘Prata-Anã’ than ‘Grande Naine’. Site- and cultivar-specific norms are recommended over universal ones for assessing the nutritional status of ‘Prata-Anã’ and ‘Grande Naine’ banana plants cultivated in different environments.
Musa spp. AAB and AAA; nutrition; site-specific conditions; diagnosis