Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Saline oscillator as a teaching experiment

Oscilador salino como experimento de ensino

Abstracts

The saline oscillator consists of two aligned containers that are filled in by a pair of different solutions, exhibiting electrical potential oscillations when released. These oscillations occur due to a difference of mass density presented by the fluids and they cause varying ions flow, leading to electrical potential variations between both reservoirs. Many biological systems can be understood by this model. In this work, the saline oscillator was investigated using copper sulfate, CuSO4, and sodium chloride, NaCl, solutions, changing parameters as the diameter and length of the capillary, diameter of the internal compartment and amount of unwanted ions in the main reservoir (distillated and deionized water). The system is shown to be very useful in undergraduate teaching classes.

saline oscillator; non-linear equations; fluid dynamics


O oscilador salino consiste em dois containers alinhados que são preenchidos por duas soluções distintas, exibindo oscilações de potencial elétrico quando liberado. Essas oscilações ocorrem devido à diferença de densidade apresentada pelos fluídos e promovem variação no fluxo de íons, levando a variações no potencial eletrico entre os reservatórios. Muitos sistemas biológicos podem ser entendidos por este modelo. Neste trabalho, o oscilador salino foi investigado usando soluções de sulfato de cobre, CuSO4, e cloreto de sódio, NaCl, alterando parâmetros como o diâmetro e comprimento do capilar, diâmetro do compartimento interno e quantidade de íons indesejados no reservatório principal (agua destilada e deionizada). O sistema mostrou-se muito útil para aulas de graduação.

oscilador salino; equacões não-lineares; dinâmica dos fluídos


ARTIGOS GERAIS

Saline oscillator as a teaching experiment

Oscilador salino como experimento de ensino

Lucas S. del Lama1 1 E-mail: lucasdellama@yahoo.com.br. ; Marcelo Mulato

Departamento de Física, Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil

ABSTRACT

The saline oscillator consists of two aligned containers that are filled in by a pair of different solutions, exhibiting electrical potential oscillations when released. These oscillations occur due to a difference of mass density presented by the fluids and they cause varying ions flow, leading to electrical potential variations between both reservoirs. Many biological systems can be understood by this model. In this work, the saline oscillator was investigated using copper sulfate, CuSO4, and sodium chloride, NaCl, solutions, changing parameters as the diameter and length of the capillary, diameter of the internal compartment and amount of unwanted ions in the main reservoir (distillated and deionized water). The system is shown to be very useful in undergraduate teaching classes.

Keywords: saline oscillator, non-linear equations, fluid dynamics.

RESUMO

O oscilador salino consiste em dois containers alinhados que são preenchidos por duas soluções distintas, exibindo oscilações de potencial elétrico quando liberado. Essas oscilações ocorrem devido à diferença de densidade apresentada pelos fluídos e promovem variação no fluxo de íons, levando a variações no potencial eletrico entre os reservatórios. Muitos sistemas biológicos podem ser entendidos por este modelo. Neste trabalho, o oscilador salino foi investigado usando soluções de sulfato de cobre, CuSO4, e cloreto de sódio, NaCl, alterando parâmetros como o diâmetro e comprimento do capilar, diâmetro do compartimento interno e quantidade de íons indesejados no reservatório principal (agua destilada e deionizada). O sistema mostrou-se muito útil para aulas de graduação.

Palavras-chave: oscilador salino, equacões não-lineares, dinâmica dos fluídos.

1. Introduction

From the fluid dynamics studies, oscillatory phenomena that are far from their respective stable equilibrium are of great interest, especially for membrane theories in biology, oceanography, meteorology and geophysics. In this context, the saline oscillator has provided innumerous elucidations related with non-linear behaviors [1-3], interface instability between two fluids [4], beyond transient states [5]. Practical examples of the oscillatory behaviors are linked with teaching, from chemical themes [5] and electronic topics [6], to mathematical simulations [7-9], which could be applied in numerical calculus. In biology, it has already been used to supply information about our taste [10], as well as the dynamic of cellular membranes [11,12].

Although oscillatory behaviors are common in many distinct subjects, a particular interest lies on biological processes. In the last few years, significant increases have been achieved in experimental and theoretical studies in membranes and interfaces related to oscillatory transport phenomena far from equilibrium region. At the end of the 80's, Yoshikawa designed a simple hydrodynamic oscillator which allies non-linear characteristics with great reproducibility, being useful for increasing student understanding of non-linear processes, and also is able to mimic many oscillatory phenomena in biology [2].

The saline oscillator was proposed in 1970 by Martin [13] and consists in a very elementary setup. It is composed of two containers, usually a syringe and a cube, concentrically aligned, which separate two fluids of distinct densities. The denser fluid fills in the internal compartment, while the external one is fulfilled by the lighter one. Through a vertical capillary, or even a hole, there is a possibility that the denser fluid flows downward and, sequentially, the lighter one goes upward. These flows exhibit self-sustained oscillations, oscillating between the compartments with a constant period for many cycles [14]. In the specific case of the saline oscillator, the fluids often involved are copper sulfate (CuSO4) or sodium chloride (NaCl) as saline solutions (ρs) and purified water (ρw). A schematic drawing of the experimental setup is shown in Fig, 1. Differently from the density oscillator, the system shows, beyond the oscillatory flood, electric potential oscillations, which are measured between the two containers by a pair of electrodes.


Many theories were proposed to explain the electric behavior presented by the system. Among them, the streaming potentials [15] propose that a double layer is formed inside the capillary. One layer would be held on the internal surface of the capillary and the other, in the center of the capillary, would be mobile. As the solution moves out, only the mobile part of the layer is carried by the flux, separating electrical charges. Since the flood changes direction with time periodically, oscillations are perceptive. Beyond the qualitative idea of the streaming potentials, an equation can be used to describe the fluids oscillations. The difference between the solutions densities, ρs - ρw, and their concentrations determine the magnitude of the buoyant force [16], which is related with the gradient of pressure between the superior and inferior segments of the needle. By means of mathematical simulations, it is known that the pressure term is the most important for driving the oscillations, although the viscosities of the fluids, which are altered with reversal flow, are also crucial [17-19]. In other words, the density and the viscosity of the fluids modify the pressure inside the needle. Mathematically, this was already stated [20] as

where ΔP is the difference of pressure between the superior and inferior segments of the needle, δ is a constant dependent of the radius of the syringe and the density of the saline solution, ξ is another arbitrary normalization constant and γ is a factor which depends of the radius and length of the needle. The solutions of this homogeneous differential equation have frequencies given by

Electrical and fluid oscillations are schematically exhibited in Fig. 2. Experimental results show that they are synchronized, i.e., voltage oscillations occur every time solutions flow in different directions. The process can be described as follows: in the beginning, the water of the cube enters the syringe through the needle, because of the difference in levels between solutions in the interior and the exterior of the syringe (region a in Fig. 2). When this phenomenon happens, no electrical oscillations are perceived and this is in fact a transient effect not observed in further oscillations. Note that the voltage difference is positive, because distillated water may, oftentimes, have a significant amount of positive ions (unwanted impurities). As time evolves, water keeps flowing to the interior of the syringe until a maximum level is achieved, which depends on the concentrations, pressure and properties of the syringe and the needle. As soon as the water flux seems to vanish, an increasing electrical potential can be noted (region b). The final potential difference value is larger than in the beginning of the process, and this might be due to a large dilution of ions inside the syringe, reducing the potential value of the reference electrode. After that, for a few moments, no flow is perceived in the system and the electric potential remains constant. The electrical signal starts to decrease synchronously when the salt solution starts to flow downward to the cube (region c). The reduction of the potential difference is related to the smaller amount of liquid inside the syringe. Probably the smaller amount of liquid has a larger ion concentration. In other words, the ion density determines the potential value and the strong volume reduction can even invert the signal of the potential difference. This would mean that inside the syringe exists a larger ion concentration than in the water cube at that moment. At the transition from regions c to d, water flow inverts upwards again, with correspondingly potential difference variation, and a new cycle initiates (region d). The period of each cycle was assumed to be the difference in time between the peaks P shown in the graph. As the properties of the fluids change along the time, drastic consequences can be noted in the electric behaviors.


Many geometrical factors influence the electric and dynamical behaviors of the system. Enlarging the length of the capillary, for example, increases the period of oscillations [14,20,21]. Moreover, as the diameter of the capillary increases, lower is the time for the system to reach equilibrium. There is even a critic diameter for which the regime goes from a fast to an irregular and non-oscillating behavior. To cite another example, increasing the concentration of salt, the oscillating period between upward and downward fluxes are essentially the same. Nevertheless, to the same situation, the electrical potential amplitude evidently raises, in consequence of the bigger number of ions [21].

Considering the important features and the simplicity of the experiment, a saline oscillator consists in a very useful apparatus, especially in teaching. In that sense, a system composed of copper sulfate, sodium chloride, distillated and deionized water (DI-water) was used in the present work. The diameter and length of the needle, the diameter of the syringe and the effects of the distillated and deionized water were investigated. The main focus was on experimental data and thus, besides the great field in numerical simulations, the saline oscillator was not investigated theoretically. This work tried to analyze the behavior of the saline oscillator when important parameters were changed.

2. Materials and methods

The experimental setup is shown in Fig. 1, in which two concentric reservoirs were aligned. The internal and smaller one corresponds to a conventional syringe. A hypodermic needle was used as the capillary, after modification of its sharp end by a cutting process. The main characteristics of each needle are described in Table 1. Varying concentrations of copper sulfate or sodium chloride, dissolved in DI-water, were used to fill this container as specified below. The cubic, external and bigger container was made of acrylic and had a fixed volume of 24 L (30.0 x 30.0 x 26.7 cm3). Distillated water from a Pilsen distillatory TE-275 TECNAL model was used to fill the external reservoir. For every experiment, the level of the liquid in the external container was always higher than the internal one, and due to this difference, the whole oscillations process started. Before inserting the syringe in the cube, a few seconds were always awaited until the fluid in the interior of the syringe started pinging, what ensured that the air in the interior of the needle would not obstruct the free flow of copper sulfate.

The difference of electrical potentials between the two containers oscillates with time, according to mass density variations. These oscillations were detected by a pair of copper wires, each one inserted at the topmost part of each reservoir. The electric ground was always set inside the syringe and the signal was acquired in the cube using an AGILENT 34401A multimeter, being transferred to a computer through a GPIB (General Purpose-Interface Bus) 82357A board.

The first parameter studied was the diameter of the needle. Four hypodermic needles with, approximately, the same length were used, as indicated in Table 1. The needles were numbered from 1 to 4, as a function of increasing diameter. A total volume of 2 mL of copper sulfate (0.5 mol/L and 1.5 mol/L) was inserted in a syringe with maximum volume of 10 mL.

The second experiment investigated the influence of the length of the needle, using a fixed diameter. Four needles with different lengths were used, see Table 1. They were numbered 2, 5, 6 and 7, respectively. The same volume and solution concentrations were used as before, as well as the 10 mL syringe.

The third study involved the diameter of the syringes. In this case, the 10 mL (internal diameter of 1.50 ± 0.05 cm) syringe was substituted by a 60 mL (internal diameter of 3.00 ± 0.05 cm) syringe. In addition, 2 mL of copper sulfate solution with higher concentration was prepared (1.5 mol/L). The higher concentration was used in order to extend the total number of cycles, i.e., the total oscillation time, as will be discussed.

Finally, the fourth and last experiment dealt with the role of unwanted ions in the larger container. For that aim, the distillated water was substituted with deionized water (DI). The deionized water was obtained by a Milli-Q unit and its conductivity was measured with a QUIMIS Q795M2 conductivimeter, calibrated with a 0.01 mol/L KCl solution. In this experiment, a 10 mL syringe was used with needle number 6. NaCl was used in place of CuSO4, because of its higher dissociation constant. A concentration of 5.0 mol/L was adopted.

The analysis of the data from all four experiments was focused in the determination of the mean periods of oscillations and in the study of the different behaviors of the curves. The error propagation was calculated according to the uncertainty of the equipment and to the standard deviation of measurements.

3. Results and discussion

The self-sustained potential oscillations vanish when an homogeneous and uniform fluid is achieved in both containers, with the amplitude of the signal decaying exponentially with time, as seen in Fig. 3(a). The system is also very sensible to unwanted external perturbations such as mechanical vibrations. An example of momentarily interrupted oscillations is shown in Fig. 3(b). In this sense, all necessary procedures must be taken to warrant the validity of the experimental data.


It was already reported that the logarithm of the period of oscillations varies linearly with the logarithm of the diameter of the needles [20]. This has been also confirmed in this work for two different concentrations of copper sulfate, see Fig. 4. From Eqs. (1) and (2), a relation between the mean period of oscillations and the diameter of the needle can be inferred. In Eq. (2), the predominant term is the constant δ, which is directly proportional to the radius of the needle, a, elevated to the fourth power [15]. Since the radius and the diameter, d, are directly proportional, then


where β depends on concentration and geometrical properties of the setup and T is the period of oscillations. Thus, theoretically the plot of log T x log d should give a straight line with a negative angular coefficient near four. Figure 4 presents our experimental data considering both, the external and internal diameters of the needles, resulting in linear dependences, as expected. Nevertheless, the angular coefficient corresponding to the external diameter shows a significant difference of 40% from the expected value. For the internal diameter, this difference was only about 1%. This was corroborated for two different copper sulfate concentrations, as shown in Fig. 4(a) and (b). The internal radius shows better results, and the thickness of the needle is an important parameter, as presumable. In summary, the results shown good relation with the theory proposed in the literature and the experiment would have great success in a teaching labs.

Figure 5 presents the results of the logarithm of the mean period (T) as a function of the logarithm of the length l of the needle. Two concentrations of copper sulfate were used: 0.5 mol/L, Fig. 5(a), and 1.5 mol/L, Fig. 5(b), respectively. According to Eq. (2), the period is inversely proportional to the constant δ [15], but δ is also inversely proportional to the length of the needle l, what results in




Observe in Eq. (4) that the proportionality constant is not totally defined once it depends on the same parameter as β, in Eq. (3). According to Fig. 5, for both copper sulfate concentrations, at least one of the four points did not fit in a linear relation. For the lowest concentration the problem occurs at the shortest length, the opposite being true for the highest concentration. We believe that the system is very sensible to external perturbations as already presented in Fig. 3. That might also be worsened for reduced syringe dimensions. This is illustrated by Fig. 5(c) where a bigger syringe of 60 mL was used. Note that in this case the linear behavior is present for the whole needle lengths range.

For smaller concentrations and shorter needles in Fig. 5(a), the needle may not be long enough to establish an stable pattern during flow. Furthermore, residual solutes might cause undesired gradients inside the needle, what increases the observed period. On the other hand, for larger concentrations and longer lengths, see Fig. 5(b), it is possible that an accumulation of solute at the internal walls of the needle leads to a slower flow behavior. That would also contribute to an increase in the observed period.

The findings of the previous experiments can also be understood in the light of Eqs. (3) and (4). They show that the period of the system is more sensitive to variation in the length of the needle than in its diameter. This happens because, for the latter, a constant angular coefficient of four is predicted, while for the former this parameter depends on concentration and geometrical factors.

In order to show the influence of the syringe on the final period of oscillation, Fig. 6 presents the original results for experiments performed under the same conditions, but with syringes of varying volume and diameter. Figure 6(a) presents the results corresponding to the smaller syringe (volume of 10 mL and internal diameter of 1.50 ± 0.05 cm), while Fig. 6(b) corresponds to the bigger one (volume of 60 mL and internal diameter of 3.00 ± 0.05 cm). The same concentration of 1.5 mol/L (CuSO4) and the same needle (number 1) was kept constant. Note in Fig. 6(a) the inset that shows the behavior of the system for the initial moments. Once the pressure over the solution was bigger in the smaller syringe due to its smaller diameter, the time needed for the system to reach equilibrium was shorter. This shows that not only the length of the needle is responsible for the linearity between the mean period and the length of the needle, but, also, the pressure over the fluid. Besides the variation in the period of oscillations, a change in profile is also observed. The oscillations pattern changed drastically for different syringes. As seen in Fig. 6, the oscillations last for longer times for the biggest diameter syringe. The oscillations corresponding to the smallest diameter syringe died at times at least one order of magnitude smaller. In addition, the voltage difference decreased much faster in the first case. As said [12], the pressure also represents an important factor for oscillations, which was corroborated by the experiments.


As previously discussed, a study involving the water of the main reservoir was accomplished. Deionized water was used in place of distillated water in order to check the influence of residual and unwanted ions in the bigger original solution. In addition, in order to use saline solutions with higher concentrations of starting solute, CuSO4 was changed to NaCl. Figure 7 presents the results for the use of needle number 6 and NaCl concentration of 5 mol/L. The smaller syringe was filled with a total volume of 2 mL of this solution. Differences of about 60% in the mean period was observed between this experiment involving NaCl and another using CuSO4 (mean periods of 820 s using sodium chloride and 510 s using copper sulfate), together with flatter top plateaus and thinner deep peaks. Note that this electrical profile using NaCl might be a good choice for teaching classes.


In order to keep the conductivity of the liquid of the main reservoir as the only varying parameter, experiments were performed and the data are presented in Fig. 8. The same conditions for the data in Fig. 7 were used, except with variations from distillated to deionized water. Figure 8(a) and (b) correspond to distillated water, while Fig. 8(c) and (d) correspond to deionized water. The difference of about 25% between the electrical potential differences using distillated water or DI-water shows that the reduced amount of unwanted ions in the deionized water also plays an important role and is in agreement with the ratio of the conductivities of the waters in both experiments. The conductivity of deionized water was only 0.500 ± 0.003 μS/cm, while the corresponding value for distillated water was 2.34 ± 0.02 μS/cm (1:4.68 ratio). Obviously, for larger concentrations the system is expected to oscillate for longer times before stationary equilibrium is reached. Note that the use of deionized water leads to smoother lines, with less noise, as compared in Fig. 8(b) and 8(d). Observe also that the mean period of oscillations using deionized water is much longer, as already discussed (820 s using DI-water and 440 s using distillated water). In this sense, if possible, teaching classes should employ deionized water in the experiments for better results. Nevertheless, when this is not possible, the use of distillated water would not compromise the final major results.


4. Conclusions

In this work the saline oscillator was investigated using saline solutions of copper sulfate and sodium chloride, as well as distillated and deionized water. The essential parameters that influence the mean period of oscillation were analyzed and discussed. Good linear relations between the logarithm of the mean periods and the logarithm of the diameters, and the Logarithm of the lengths of the needle were found. The best conditions for linearity, especially for the latter case, were presented and discussed in order to optimize the experiment in teaching classes.

The volume of the syringe played an important role considering the time during which the system exhibited self-sustained oscillations. In fact, this was related with the effective area of each syringe. Equilibrium was achieved faster for the larger difference in pressure.

Conductivities of the outer reservoir solutions were also measured. According to the experiments, deionized water was better suited, since it shows less noises, as well as longer mean periods along the experiment. However, if deionized water is not available, distillated water can be used instead, without compromising the major results and the learning of the topics involved.

In that sense, the saline oscillator can be employed in physics and biology classes, with great applications in understanding fluid dynamics and membrane theories, as examples. Furthermore, important contributions could be added to the experiments conciliating numerical simulations of non-linear systems.

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by CNPq, Brazil. The authors thank J.L. Aziani, T.Z. Pavan, V.R. Balbo, and C.A. Brunello.

Recebido em 23/2/2010

Aceito em 12/1/2011

Publicado em 1/12/2011

  • [1] K. Yoshikawa, N. Oyama, M. Shoji and S. Nakata, The American Journal of Physics 59, 137 (1991).
  • [2] K. Yoshikawa, S. Nakata, M. Yamanaka and T. Waki, Journal of Chemical Education 66, 205 (1989).
  • [3] K. Yoshikawa, K. Fukunaga and H. Kawakami, Chemical Physics Letters 174, 203 (1990).
  • [4] P.-H. Alfredsson and T. Lagerstedt, Physics of Fluids 24, 10 (1981).
  • [5] J.A. Morón-Villarreyes, H.J.B. da Costa, F. Kokubun, L.C. Schmitz and J.A. Castro, Computers and Chemical Engineering 24, 1753 (2000).
  • [6] R. Cervellati and R. Solda, The American Journal of Physics 69, 543 (2001).
  • [7] S. Nakata, H. Kitahata, A. Terada and T. Matsuyama, Chemical Physics Letters 351, 379 (2002).
  • [8] Y. Takemoto, S. Chiba, M. Okamura, K. Yoshikawa, Computational Technologies 1, 82 (1996).
  • [9] H. Kitahata, A.Yamada and S. Nakata, Journal of Chemical Physics 119, 9 (2003).
  • [10] U. Roy, S.K. Saha, C.R.K. Priya, V. Jayashree and R.C. Srivastava, Instrumentation Science & Technology 31, 425 (2003).
  • [11] T. Teorell, The Journal of General Physiology 42, 831 (1959).
  • [12] T. Teorell, The Journal of General Physiology 42, 847 (1959).
  • [13] S. Martin, 1970 apud Ref. [7]
  • [14] O. Steinbock, A. Lange and I. Rehberg, Physical Review Letters 81, 798 (1998).
  • [15] A.K. Das and A. Rao, in: National Conference on Nonlinear System & Dynamics, NCNSD, in Hydrodynamic Oscillator - A Simple Non-Linear Dynamical System (2003).
  • [16] K. Yoshikawa, Dynamical System and Applications, edited by N. Aoki (World Scientific, Singapore, 1987).
  • [17] M. Okamura and K. Yoshikawa, Physical Review E 61, 2445 (2000).
  • [18] T. Kano and S. Kinoshita, Physical Review E 76, 046208 (2007).
  • [19] M. Ueno, F. Uehara, Y. Narahara and Y. Watanabe, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 45, 8929 (2006).
  • [20] R.P. Rastogi, R.C. Srivastava and S. Kumar, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 283, 139 (2005).
  • [21] N. Rincon and F. Fajardo, Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física 28, 67 (2006).
  • 1
    E-mail:
  • Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      02 Mar 2012
    • Date of issue
      Dec 2011

    History

    • Accepted
      12 Jan 2011
    • Received
      23 Feb 2010
    Sociedade Brasileira de Física Caixa Postal 66328, 05389-970 São Paulo SP - Brazil - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
    E-mail: marcio@sbfisica.org.br