OBJECTIVE: Behçet's Disease Current Activity Form (BDCAF), an instrument for assessing activity of Behçet's Disease (BD), was originally produced in English. Its cross-cultural adaptation to Brazilian Portuguese language generated a version called BR-BDCAF. Recently, a simplified model of this protocol (with 12 items) was developed by the International Society for Behçet's Disease (ISBD) to generate an index called BDAI (Behçet's Disease Activity Index). For this reason, in this work we intended to create the simplified model of the Brazilian version, measure their reliability and evaluate the validity of the results of both instruments, comparing their performances. METHODS: The simplified version of BR-BDCAF was called BR-BDCAF(s). Both protocols were applied in 25 BD patients. Reliability of BR-BDCAF(s) was evaluated through intra- and interobserver agreement according to kappa statistic. Sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp) and accuracy of both protocols on defining BD active cases were evaluated by comparing the rheumatologist expert clinical judgement to each protocol, and the best cut-off points were established for each instrument by the ROC curve (receive-operator characteristic). RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: BR-BDCAF(s) showed good reliability on items relating to mucocutaneous and articular manifestations of BD. The best cut-off points for the definition of active cases were: higher than four with BR-BDCAF (Se = 80.0%, Sp = 86.7%) and higher than one with BR-BDCAF( s) (Se = 70.0%, Sp = 86.7%). Accuracy of both protocols was similar, suggesting that both can be used as tools to assess activity of DB.
Behçet's Disease; translation; Cross-cultural comparison; Disease activity index
