Nutrient stock and nutritional efficiency of woody species in dry tropical forest as reforestation indicators

Barbosa, Mozart Duarte; Freire, Fernando José; Marangon, Luiz Carlos; Feliciano, Ana Lícia Patriota; Lima, Rosival Barros de Andrade; Silva, Roseane Karla Soares da

doi:10.1590/0034-737X201966050008

Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Brasil

Español English

sumário « anterior atual seguinte »

Sumário

Soil Science and Plant Nutrition • Rev. Ceres 66 (5) • Sep-Oct 2019 • https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-737X201966050008 copy

Nutrient stock and nutritional efficiency of woody species in dry tropical forest as reforestation indicators¹ This work is part of first author’s doctoral thesis with financial supporting of the CAPES and CNPQ.

Authorship SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

ABSTRACT

Efficient forest species can be indicated for reforesting environments, which present nutritional restriction. The objective of this study was to determine the nutrient stock in leaf biomass of the species of greatest importance value (IV) in a tropical dry forest fragment, as well as to evaluate the nutritional efficiency of these species as reforestation indicators. A phytosociological study of the woody species was carried out defining the ten species with the greatest IV. Three individuals of each species were selected and sampled, with 25 leaves being collected from the middle part of the crown of each individual. The N, P, K, Ca and Mg contents were determined in these leaves and the leaf biomass was estimated by an allometric equation, calculating the stock of these nutrients and the nutritional efficiency of the species. The Schinopsis brasiliensis and Mimosa tenuiflora species can be recommended in environments with restricted P availability, and Spondias tuberosa can additionally be indicated to populate areas with low levels of K and Mg in the soil. Differences in the nutritional efficiency of the species can be attributed to the differences in the absorption and translocation capacity, as well as the utilization of these nutrients.

Keywords:
biomass; caatinga; nutritional content; nutrient use

Attribute	Depth (m)
Attribute	0.0 - 0.10	0.10 - 0.20
pH (H₂O)	5.43	5.43
Ca²⁺ (cmol_c dm^-3)	4.55	2.88
Mg²⁺ (cmol_c dm^-3)	2.78	4.60
K⁺ (cmol_c dm^-3)	0.47	0.39
Al³⁺ (cmol_c dm^-3)	0.10	0.08
H+Al (cmol_c dm³)	6.81	5.86
P (mg dm^-3)	22.19	10.89
Fe (mg kg^-1)	85.29	80.81
Cu (mg kg^-1)	1.85	1.5
Zn (mg kg^-1)	5.64	4.39
Mn (mg kg^-1)	5.11	4.57
SB (cmol_c dm^-3)⁽¹⁾	7.80	7.87
CEC potential (cmol_c dm^-3)⁽²⁾	14.61	13.70
CEC effective (cmol_c dm^-3)⁽³⁾	7.90	7.95
V (%)⁽⁴⁾	53.30	57.40
m (%)⁽⁵⁾	1.30	1.00
TOC (g kg^-1)⁽⁶⁾	15.6	10.5
CO_HAF (g kg^-1)⁽⁷⁾	2.3	1.2
CO_FAF (g kg^-1)⁽⁸⁾	1.6	3.2
CO_HF (g kg^-1)⁽⁹⁾	9.9	5.5
HS (g kg^-1)⁽¹⁰⁾	13.8	9.9
Sand (g kg^-1)	790	790
Silt (g kg^-1)	100	100
Clay (g kg^-1)	90	90

Species	Biomass (kg ha^-1)	Family	Habitats
Mimosa ophthalmocentra Mart. ex Benth.	1,252.0	Fabaceae	tree
Poincianella pyramidalis (Tul.) L.P. Queiroz	1,448.7	Fabaceae	tree
Schinopsis brasiliensis Engl.	142.1	Anacardiaceae	tree
Senegalia bahiensis (Benth.) Seigler & Ebinger	67.5	Fabaceae	tree
Senegalia paniculata (Willd.) Killip	57.1	Fabaceae	tree
Croton blanchetianus Baill.	233.6	Euphorbiaceae	shrub
Jatropha mollissima (Pohl) Baill.	150.4	Euphorbiaceae	shrub
Spondias tuberosa Arruda	142.1	Anacardiaceae	tree
Mimosa tenuiflora (Willd.) Poir.	94.7	Fabaceae	tree
Piptadenia stipulacea (Benth.) Ducke	31.6	Fabaceae	tree
Total	3,619.8

Species	N	P	K	Ca	Mg
g kg^-1
M. ophthalmocentra	27.44 ± 0.96^ns	6.00 ± 0.88 b	14.77 ± 0.62 c	15.65 ± 2.71^ns	3.93 ± 1.23^ns
P. pyramidalis	23.98 ± 2.76	6.39 ± 0.54 b	14.15 ± 0.62 c	22.16 ± 4.59	1.61 ± 0.41
S. brasiliensis	19.88 ± 0.96	4.71 ± 0.08 b	14.49 ± 1.36 c	16.59 ± 2.85	4.43 ± 3.03
S. bahiensis	29.58 ± 4.93	6.69 ± 0.14 b	17.34 ± 0.81 b	19.34 ± 8.28	4.55 ± 1.76
S. paniculata	33.32 ± 1.12	6.33 ± 0.71 b	17.44 ± 1.18 b	21.94 ± 6.76	3.27 ± 1.01
C. blanchetianus	25.29 ± 9.79	10.58 ± 0.50 a	26.45 ± 1.39 a	22.52 ± 4.92	5.81 ± 2.36
J. mollissima	24.09 ± 0.50	10.27 ± 3.81 a	25.85 ± 2.49 a	22.34 ± 4.89	5.88 ± 1.80
S. tuberosa	21.37 ± 0.70	5.56 ± 0.79 b	10.79 ± 2.55 d	22.04 ± 8.17	2.37 ± 0.71
M. tenuiflora	16.98 ± 8.41	4.80 ± 0.70 b	12.58 ± 0.54 d	20.06 ± 6.92	4.93 ± 2.92
P. stipulacea	27.53 ± 3.54	8.46 ± 0.15 a	19.82 ± 1.28 b	14.35 ± 8.44	3.71 ± 1.49

Mean	24.94 ± 4.86	6.97 ± 1.36	17.36 ± 1.46	19.70 ± 6.31	4.04 ± 1.95

Species	N	P	K	Ca	Mg
kg ha^-1
M. ophthalmocentra	34.36 ± 1.21 a	7.51 ± 1.10 b	18.50 ± 0.78 b	19.60 ± 3,40 b	4.92 ± 1.54 a
P. pyramidalis	34.75 ± 4.00 a	9,26 ± 0.79 a	20.51 ± 0.90 a	32.11± 6,65 a	2.34 ± 0.60 b
S. brasiliensis	2.83 ± 0.13 b	0.66 ± 0.01 e	2.06 ± 0.19 e	2.36 ± 0.40 c	0.63 ± 0.43 c
S. bahiensis	2.00 ± 0.33 b	0.45 ± 0.01 e	1.17 ± 0.05 f	1.31 ± 0.56 c	0.30 ± 0.11 c
S. paniculata	1.90 ± 0.06 b	0.36 ± 0.04 e	1.00 ± 0.06 f	1.25 ± 0.38 c	0.18 ± 0.06 c
C. blanchetianus	5.91 ± 2.28 b	2.47 ± 0.11 c	6.18 ± 0.32 c	5.26 ± 1.14 c	1.35 ± 0.54 b
J. mollissima	3.70 ± 0.01 b	1.54 ± 0.57 d	3.89 ± 0.37 d	3.36 ± 0.73 c	0.88 ± 0.27 c
S. tuberosa	3.04 ± 0.09 b	0.79 ± 0.11 e	1.53 ± 0.36 e	3.13 ± 1.16 c	0.34 ± 0.10 c
M. tenuiflora	1.61 ± 0.79 b	0.45 ± 0.07 e	1.19 ± 0.05 f	1.90 ± 0.65 c	0.46 ± 0.27 c
P. stipulacea	0.96 ± 0.11 b	0.27 ± 0.005 e	0.62 ± 0.04 f	0.45 ± 0.26 c	0.11 ± 0.04 c

Mean	9.11 ± 1.57	1.61 ± 0.31	5.67 ± 0.44	7.07 ± 2.46	1.15 ± 0.60

Species	N	P	K	Ca	Mg
kg kg^-1
M. ophthalmocentra	36.47 ± 1.26^ns	168.93 ± 24.57 b	67.77 ± 2.84 b	65.09 ± 10.61^ns	274.18 ± 95.90 b
P. pyramidalis	42.04 ± 4.55	157.07 ± 14.03 b	70.73 ± 3.09 b	46.46 ± 9.78	643.84 ± 146.88 a
S. brasiliensis	50.38 ± 2.39	211.94 ± 3.66 a	69.41 ± 6.76 b	61.55 ± 11.12	306.79 ± 190.09 b
S. bahiensis	34.49 ± 6.21	149.49 ± 3.25 b	57.74 ± 2.77 c	59.47 ± 28.08	251.50 ± 124.16 b
S. paniculata	30.03 ± 1.01	159.05 ± 16.93 b	57.50 ± 4.07 c	48.76 ± 15.80	329.36 ± 117.74 b
C. blanchetianus	45.10 ± 21.71	94.65 ± 4.42 c	37.86 ± 1.98 d	46.06 ± 11.39	190.00 ± 66.86 b
J. mollissima	40.54 ± 0.06	110.26 ± 52.02 c	38.93 ± 3.95 d	46.22 ± 10.17	179.82 ± 47.59 b
S. tuberosa	46.82 ± 1.53	182.47 ± 28.30 b	96.78 ± 26.49 a	50.79 ± 22.28	446.53 ± 130.58 a
M. tenuiflora	76.31 ± 52.86	211.30 ± 30.64 a	79.59 ± 3.51 b	54.48 ± 20.49	259.10 ± 152.08 b
P. stipulacea	36.75 ± 5.05	118.24 ± 2.16 c	50.60 ± 3.32 c	91.92 ± 60.32	305.89 ± 139.62 b

Mean	43.89 ± 18.99	156.34 ± 24.65	62.69 ± 8.89	57.08 ± 25.24	318.70 ± 132.10

Universidade Federal de Viçosa Av. Peter Henry Rolfs, s/n, 36570-000 Viçosa, Minas Gerais Brasil, Tel./Fax: (55 31) 3612-2078 - Viçosa - MG - Brazil
E-mail: ceres@ufv.br

Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

[1] ^* Corresponding author: fernando.freire@ufrpe.br

Brasil

Brasil

Nutrient stock and nutritional efficiency of woody species in dry tropical forest as reforestation indicators1 This work is part of first author’s doctoral thesis with financial supporting of the CAPES and CNPQ.

ABSTRACT

Nutrient stock and nutritional efficiency of woody species in dry tropical forest as reforestation indicators¹ This work is part of first author’s doctoral thesis with financial supporting of the CAPES and CNPQ.