BANFISA e (IN)DICA-SUS na graduação em saúde: o lúdico e a construção de
               aprendizados

to analyze the learning built during the matches of the games by students of the subject Gestão de Políticas Públicas em Saúde at the Universidade de Brasília.

Method:

exploratory, descriptive research, in a qualitative approach, with 26 students from various graduation courses in health, using a questionnaire and participant observation.

Results:

participants reinvented rules, related issues addressed in the games to the reality, interacted with colleagues and had fun throughout the match. Comparing the games in relation to ludicity, the BANFISA was more attractive than the (IN) DICA-SUS, although they are complementary.

Conclusions:

learning constructed by the students goes beyond the content of the subject; involve the active participation in group and creativity.

Health Education; Games and Toys; Higher Education; Creativity; Personal Autonomy

Authorship

Laianna Victoria Santiago Silva CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Laianna Victoria Santiago Silva. E-mail: laianna.victoria@hotmail.com

Universidade de Brasília, School of Life Sciences, Nursing Department, Center of Studies in Education and Health Promotion and Inclusive Projects. Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.Universidade de BrasíliaBrazilDistrito Federal, BrazilUniversidade de Brasília, School of Life Sciences, Nursing Department, Center of Studies in Education and Health Promotion and Inclusive Projects. Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.

Patrícia Sayuri de Lima Tanaka

Maria Raquel Gomes Maia Pires

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Laianna Victoria Santiago Silva. E-mail: laianna.victoria@hotmail.com

SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

Tables

Tables (3)

Thumbnail

Chart 1
Levels and items of the participant observation script used during the games of (IN)DICA-SUS and BANFISA, Brasilia, Distrito Federal, Brazil, 2012

Thumbnail

Chart 2
Comparison between answers from students to the questionnaire and records of participant observation of games, by empirical category and game played, Brasilia, Distrito Federal, Brazil, 2012

Thumbnail

Table 1
Comparison of frequency of BANFISA and (IN) DICASUS answers by variables, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil, 2012

Chart 1 Levels and items of the participant observation script used during the games of (IN)DICA-SUS and BANFISA, Brasilia, Distrito Federal, Brazil, 2012

Observation script
LEVELS	ITEMS
Game, creativity and teamwork	Active interaction among participants
	Fierce competition with colleagues to win the game
	Help to colleagues
	Creation and/or change of rules
	Presence of other playing relations
Game and autonomy in knowledge construction	Reports of specific characteristics of SUS based on the game
	Difficulties concerning SUS
	Reports of interest in further studying the topic
	Attention and excitement to get the right answers and/or to build the healthcare network
Game and emotions	Body language and relaxing communication during the game
	Reports of concern and/or expression of nervousness
	Competition as a stimulus for the game
	Positive reports regarding fun
	Negative reports regarding fun
	Attitude and behavior expressing boredom

Chart 2 Comparison between answers from students to the questionnaire and records of participant observation of games, by empirical category and game played, Brasilia, Distrito Federal, Brazil, 2012

Categories	Statements and records of participant observation
Categories	BANFISA	(IN)DICA-SUS
Reinvention of rules	"We decided we had to complete the network with 'services' of the same color, in order to increase the number of negotiations, interaction and difficulty of the game." GB.8	"Everybody helped and we gave easier hints, then the game went on better and more people made moves." GI.22
Reinvention of rules	Participant observation: A group decided that the network could only be of one color, corresponding to the color of the pawn. The justification was that the game would be more difficult and would have more negotiations.	Participant observation: Participants of a group chose the easiest cards and disposed of the difficult ones. One of the groups decided that everybody should try to get the answers right together.
To learn while playing	"Some questions were complex, but they gave me the opportunity to learn about some topics that were unknown to me until then. GB.17	"I ended up learning many things I didn't know." GI.20
To learn while playing	Participant Observation: A participant read a card and the other did not understand what it was about. "Never heard about that..." As soon as reading was done, participants asked to see the card to learn/ understand the topic.	Participant observation: Students came closer to each other after they got the answers right in order to read all the hints. Many of them showed interest in learning during the game and some of them took notes.
Lack of interest in the game/will to quit	"I wanted to quit, because I found BANFISA very confusing" GB.21	"I wanted to quit because, despite being relaxing, it is too lengthy." GI.6
	Participant observation: Two students were not interested. One sat near the group and the other was using the computer.	"I wanted to quit because I couldn't get any answer right." GI.7
		Participant observation: When it took them long to get a right answer, players asked whether they should play until the end or the class was finished.
Motivation to study	"The game provides a light learning that encourages students to learn more, by the way questions are raised." GB.3	"I felt that it is necessary to deepen knowledge of certain areas of the SUS, for instance, specific regulations for the SUS". GI.4
Assimilation of content	"Cames allow to learn content in a fun and relaxing way. In a simple and creative way we can better assimilate content." GB.6	"By means of a simple method, you can learn everything, its history, its role and its functions through hints." GI.22
Self-assessment	"Winning, as the game addresses topics discussed in the classroom. Winning means that we learned the content." GB.12	"They did favor learning, because you play and learn in a funny and relaxing way. And you even test your knowledge". GI.24

Table 1 Comparison of frequency of BANFISA and (IN) DICASUS answers by variables, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil, 2012

Variables	(IN)DICA-SUS BANFISA No.
Variables	No. (%)	(%)
Reinvention of rules	3 (11.1)	11 (29)
Help to colleagues	12 (44.4)	9 (23.7)
Will to win	10 (27.7)	17 (43.6)
Boredom	5 (11.7)	0 (0)
Connecting and understanding topics	4 (11.1)	13 (36.1)
Interaction/group discussion	9(33.3)	8 (21.1)

How to cite

copy

Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem SGA Norte Quadra 603 Conj. "B" - Av. L2 Norte 70830-102 Brasília, DF, Brasil, Tel.: (55 61) 3226-0653, Fax: (55 61) 3225-4473 - Brasília - DF - Brazil
E-mail: reben@abennacional.org.br

Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

Versão para download de PDF

PDF

Português
Inglês

Versões e tradução automática

Versão original do texto

English
Português

Tradução automática

Google Translator
Microsoft Translator

Como citar

RIS

BIBTEX

Outros formatos de citação e exportação:

SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online
Rua Dr. Diogo de Faria, 1087 – 9º andar – Vila Clementino 04037-003 São Paulo/SP - Brasil
E-mail: scielo@scielo.org

Leia a Declaração de Acesso Aberto

Métricas

BANFISA e (IN)DICA-SUS na graduação em saúde: o lúdico e a construção de aprendizados

PlumX

Mensagem

[1] CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Laianna Victoria Santiago Silva. E-mail: laianna.victoria@hotmail.com