Knowledge and practices of primary care providers on skin cancer and skin self-examination

Conhecimento e práticas dos provedores de cuidados primários sobre o câncer de pele e o autoexame da pele

Conocimiento y prácticas de los proveedores de cuidados primarios acerca del cáncer de piel y el autoexamen de la piel

ABSTRACT

Objective

To determine the knowledge and practices related to skin cancer and skin self-examination of primary care providers.

Method

This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted in Turkey. The study was carried out in primary health centers such as family health centers, community health centers, early cancer detection centers and family planning centers in 2016-2017. Participants’ socio-demographic characteristics, their knowledge and practices related to skin cancer, skin cancer risk factors and skin self-examination were determined.

Results

The study population included 94 primary care providers. The symptoms of which the participants were most aware were changes in the color of moles or skin spots (95.71%), and of which participants were the least aware was the itching of a mole (71.43%). Among participants, the most recognized risk factor was having fair skin (97.14%), whereas the least known was the presence of birthmarks (24.29%). The mean scores the participants obtained from the questionnaire were as follows: 5.39±1.61 for skin cancer risk factors and 10.47±2.73 for skin cancer symptoms. Of the participants, 14.29% received training on skin self-examination, 38.57% knew how to perform skin self-examination, and 67.14% did not perform skin self-examination. Of the participants, 61.7% did not perform skin self-examination because they did not know what to look for. Of the participants, 85.71% did not have continuing education/workshop about skin self-examination after graduation.

Conclusion

Although the primary care providers’ knowledge of skin cancer symptoms was adequate, their knowledge of skin cancer risk factors was not sufficient. Primary care providers’ knowledge of skin self-examination was good, but they did not perform skin self-examination adequately.

Skin Neoplasms; Self-Examination; Primary Health Care; Primary Care Nursing; Professional Practice

RESUMO

Objetivo

Determinar o conhecimento dos provedores de cuidados primários e suas práticas relacionadas com o câncer de pele e o autoexame da pele.

Método

Este estudo descritivo transversal foi conduzido na Turquia. O estudo foi realizado em centros de saúde primários, tais como centros de saúde da família, centros de saúde comunitários, centros de detecção precoce do câncer e centros de planejamento familiar em 2016-2017. As características sociodemográficas dos participantes, seu conhecimento e práticas relacionados com o câncer de pele, fatores de risco para o câncer de pele e o autoexame da pele foram determinados.

Resultados

A população do estudo incluiu 94 provedores de cuidados primários. Os sintomas dos quais os participantes estiveram mais conscientes foram mudanças na cor das pintas ou manchas na pele (95,71%) e dos quais os participantes estiveram menos conscientes foi a coceira em uma pinta (71,43%). Entre os participantes, o fator de risco mais reconhecido foi ter pele clara (97,14%), ao passo que o menos conhecido foi a presença de marcas de nascença (24,29%). Os principais scores que os participantes obtiveram do questionário foram os seguintes: 5,39±1,61 para fatores de risco para câncer de pele e 10,47±2,73 para sintomas de câncer de pele. Dos participantes, 14,29% receberam treinamento sobre autoexame, 38,57% sabiam como realizar o autoexame e 67,14% não realizavam autoexame de pele. Dos participantes, 61,7% não realizavam autoexame porque não sabiam o que procurar. Dos participantes, 85,71% não tiveram educação continuada/workshop sobre autoexame de pele após a graduação.

Conclusão

Embora o conhecimento dos provedores de cuidados primários sobre os sintomas do câncer de pele foi adequado, seu conhecimento dos fatores de risco para o câncer de pele não foi suficiente. O conhecimento dos provedores de cuidados primários sobre o autoexame da pele foi bom, mas eles não realizaram o autoexame da pele adequadamente.

Neoplasias Cutâneas; Autoexame; Atenção Primária à Saúde; Enfermagem de Atenção Primária; Prática Profissional

RESUMEN

Objetivo

Conocimiento y prácticas de los proveedores de cuidados primarios y sus prácticas relacionadas con el cáncer de piel y el autoexamen de la piel.

Método

Este estudio descriptivo transversal fue conducido en Turquía. El estudio fue llevado a cabo en centros de salud primaria, tales como centros de salud de la familia, centros de salud comunitarios, centros de detección precoz del cáncer y centros de planificación familiar en 2016-2017. Las características sociodemográficas de los participantes, su conocimiento y prácticas relacionadas con el cáncer de piel, factores de riesgo para el cáncer de piel y el autoexamen de la piel fueron determinados.

Resultados

La población del estudio incluyó a 94 proveedores de cuidados primarios. Los síntomas de los que los participantes estuvieron más enterados fueron los cambios en el color de los lunares o manchas en la piel (95,71%) y de los que los participantes estuvieron menos enterados fue la picazón en un lunar (71,43%). Entre los participantes, el factor de riesgo más reconocido fue tener piel clara (97,14%), mientras que el menos conocido fue la presencia de marcas de nacimiento (24,29%). Los principales scores que los participantes obtuvieron del cuestionario fueron los siguientes: 5,39±1,61 para factores de riesgo para cáncer de piel y 10,47±2,73 para síntomas de cáncer de piel. De los participantes, el 14,29% recibieron entrenamiento acerca del autoexamen, el 38,57% sabían cómo realizar el autoexamen y el 67,14% no realizaban el autoexamen de la piel. De los participantes, el 61,7% no realizaban el autoexamen porque no sabían qué buscar. De los participantes, el 85,71% no tuvieron educación continuada/taller sobre autoexamen de la piel después del grado académico.

Conclusión

Aunque el conocimiento de los proveedores de cuidados primarios acerca de los síntomas del cáncer de piel fue adecuado, su conocimiento de los factores de riesgo para el cáncer de piel no fue suficiente. El conocimiento de los proveedores de cuidados primarios acerca del autoexamen de la piel fue bueno, pero ellos no llevaron a cabo el autoexamen de la piel adecuadamente.

Neoplasias Cutáneas; Autoexamen; Atención Primaria de Salud; Enfermería de Atención Primaria; Práctica Profesional

INTRODUCTION

Skin cancer is the most common form of cancer worldwide, and thus it is a global public health issue⁽¹⁾. Changes in the ozone layer have increased the harmful effects of ultraviolet (UV) A and UVB rays, and exposed the skin, the largest organ of our body, to these harmful effects⁽²⁾. The Disability-Adjusted Life Year lost due to UV is calculated as 1.5 million days per year worldwide⁽³⁾. This is mainly caused by the increased incidences of skin cancer globally⁽²⁾. The World Health Organization has reported that one in three people diagnosed with cancer has skin cancer⁽⁴⁾. In Australia, skin cancer is the most commonly diagnosed form of cancer among people aged 15 to 44 years. It also has the highest mortality rate. In the United States (USA), melanoma ranks the fifth most common form of cancer in males and ranks seventh in females⁽³⁾. The incidence of melanoma in the UK is estimated to increase by 88% in men and 66% in women by 2020⁽⁵⁾. The incidence of melanoma in Turkey is 1.6 per 100,000 people, and the mortality rate is 1.0 per 100,000 people⁽⁶⁾. It was also reported that the incidence of melanoma in Turkey is 1.8 per 100,000 people in males and 1.2 per 100,000 people in females⁽⁷⁾. The incidence rates of malignant melanoma across the southeastern region of Europe are increasing. Significant increases in mortality rates were observed in older men in the Czech Republic, Serbia and Turkey⁽⁸⁾. In one Turkish study that took place in two different centers over a twenty-year and ten-year study period⁽⁹⁾, 239 and 183 cases of primary cutaneous melanoma were diagnosed after screening and the mean melanoma diagnosis per year was 11.9 and 18.3, respectively. It was reported that the number of melanoma diagnosis markedly increased over time in both centers⁽⁹⁾.

Factors leading to skin cancer include overexposure to sunlight, gender, phenotypic traits, family history, Fitzpatrick I-II skin type, childhood sunburn, immunosuppression, ionizing radiation, Psoralen-UVA (PUVA) treatments, environmental carcinogens, HPV infection, artificial light sources, nevi and genetic syndromes. Even though everyone is at risk of developing skin cancer, fair-skinned individuals, and individuals having: a large number of moles and spots, extended sun exposure, and/or childhood history of sunburn are at a greater risk of developing skin cancer^(10-13). According to the list released by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), wearing sunscreen products with at least sun protection factor (SPF) 30, wearing sun protective clothing, wearing sunglasses with UV protection, avoiding sun exposure between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. unless necessary, refraining from solariums, regular self-examining skin spots, moles and freckles seasonally are skin cancer prevention methods⁽¹⁴⁾. The most important known fact about skin cancer is that it is a preventable disease with early diagnosis. When diagnosed early, the survival rate in melanoma patients is more than 98%⁽¹⁵⁾. Therefore, skin self-examination is of great importance in the early diagnosis and treatment of skin cancers⁽¹⁵⁾. Skin self-examination (SSE) is an early diagnostic method recommended by organizations such as the American Cancer Society, The Cancer Council Australia, and The Skin Cancer Foundation^(15-17). It is recommended that SSE be performed every month. An examination takes about 10 minutes. In SSE, any mole, freckle or spot on the skin, whether congenital or acquired should be evaluated according to the ABCDE rule. ABCDE rule involves the following criteria: A-Asymmetry, B-Border, C-Color, D-Diameter, and E-Evolving^(16-17).

Raising public awareness plays an important role in the prevention and early diagnosis of skin cancer. In this context, health personnel should play a fundamental role, and if they are to be role models and enlighten the public, they should first protect their own health⁽¹⁸⁾. It is especially important for primary care providers to have accurate and adequate knowledge of the issue based on their roles as educators and counselors in cancer preventive health services. The purpose of this study is to determine primary care providers’ knowledge of skin cancer, and their SSE practices.

METHOD

The study is a cross-sectional descriptive study. The study was carried out in several primary health centers (7 Family Health Centers, 1 Community Health Center, 1 Early Cancer Detection Center and 1 Family Planning Center) affiliated with the Provincial Directorate of Public Health in a province located in the Central Anatolian Region of Turkey between November 2016 and February 2017.

The study population included 94 physicians, nurses and midwives working in primary health services. No sampling method was implemented in the present study. All the study population was intended to be included in the study. Of the study population, 70 health workers volunteered to participate in the research. The participation rate was 75%.

The study data were collected with a questionnaire developed by the researchers through a literature review^(19-21). The questionnaire contains 43 items and three sections. The first section included health workers’ socio-demographics and individual risk factors for skin cancer. The second section focused on their level of knowledge about the risk factors and symptoms of skin cancer. The third section assessed their knowledge and practices regarding SSE. “The participants’ socio-demographics and individual risk factors for skin cancer”; this section contains 14 items questioning healthcare workers socio-demographic characteristics such as age, gender, workplace, and occupation and physical characteristics such as eye, skin, hair color, etc. with regards to posing a risk for skin cancer. The participants were also asked whether they considered themselves at risk for skin cancer and whether they visited a dermatologist for skin cancer screening. “The participants’ knowledge levels about the symptoms and risk factors for skin cancer”; the participants were asked the following twelve questions to determine their levels of knowledge about the symptoms of skin cancer⁽²¹⁾: “An unusual change in the skin in any part of the body (the sudden growth of a skin formation and the bright brown, black, or multicolored appearance)”, “The presence of wound that does not heal in more than three weeks”, “congenital or acquired moles or skin spots changing in color, size, thickness, surface, developing irregularity of outer border, becoming larger than 6 mm or the diameter of a pencil”, “the emergence of new spots after the age of 21”, “itching, crusting, disintegration and/or bleeding of a mole or wound”. For each correct answer, 1 point was given, and for each wrong answer 0 points were given. The minimum and maximum possible scores obtainable from the responses regarding the symptoms of skin cancer were 0 and 12, respectively. High scores indicate that the level of knowledge is sufficient. The questionnaire was evaluated for validity and reliability⁽²¹⁾. In the original study⁽²¹⁾, content validity and Kuder-Richardson value of the questionnaire were found to be 0.81 and 0.83, respectively. In this study content validity and Kuder-Richardson value of the questionnaire were found to be 0.85 and 0.88, respectively. To determine the participants’ knowledge levels regarding their risks for skin cancer, they were asked 8 questions⁽²⁰⁾. The participants obtained 1 point for each correct response and 0 points for each incorrect response on the following items: “having fair skin”, “having light-colored eyes”, “having a family history of skin cancer”, “the presence of brown/large moles on the skin”, “the presence of a birthmark on the skin”, “having ever had sunburn blisters”, “tanning in a solarium”, “lifetime, long-term exposure to sun”. The minimum and maximum possible scores to be obtained from the responses regarding the risks for skin cancer were 0 and 8, respectively. High scores indicate that the participant has adequate knowledge about factors that increase the risk of skin cancer. The questionnaire was found valid and reliable⁽²⁰⁾. In this study, content validity (0.84) and Kuder-Richardson (0.86) value of the questionnaire were calculated. “The participants’ knowledge and practices related to skin self-examination (SSE)”; this section contains 8 items. The items question whether the participants were knowledgeable of SSE practices and the ABCDE rule. The participants were expected to choose the correct answer “once a month” in response to the question “How often should self-skin examination be performed”, the correct answer; “Yes, always” in response to the questions “a full-length mirror is used during SSE” and “a hand-held mirror is used during SSE” and the correct answer “all parts of the body” in response to the question “which areas should be examined when self-skin examination is performed”. The participants were asked whether they performed self-skin examination. Those who did not were also asked “why not?” The responses to these questions were not rated. In October 2016, a pilot application was conducted with 30 primary health care workers working in another city who were not participating in the study. The study design is presented in Figure 1.

Figure 1
– Design of study by authors, Çankırı, Turkey, 2016-2017.

The data were analyzed using the SPSS 16.0 program. Descriptive statistics such as number and percentage distributions were calculated.

To carry out the research, written permissions were obtained from the ethics committee of the university (13 Oct 2016; number 2016/03) where the study was to be conducted and the Provincial Directorate of Public Health. The participants gave their verbal consent after they were informed about the research. The participants filled out the questionnaires in the health centers where they worked. It took each participant approximately 15 minutes to complete the questionnaire.

RESULTS

The participants’ socio-demographic characteristics and risks of skin cancer; of the participants, 70% were female, 30% were in the 33-38 age group. 37.14% were physicians, 31.43% were nurses, 31.43% were midwives, 15.7% had sandy red/blonde hair, 20% had blue-gray-light color eyes, 12.86% had fair skin, 40% had more than 10 moles, 7.4% had blood relatives diagnosed with skin cancer, 55.71% considered themselves at risk for skin cancer, and 97.14% did not have any skin cancer screening previously (Table 1).

Table 1
– Descriptive variables and skin cancer risk status of primary care providers – Çankırı, Turkey, 2016-2017.

Variables		n*	%
Age	21-26	7	10.0
	27-32	18	25.71
	33-38	21	30.0
	39-44	19	27.14
	≥45	5	7.14
Gender	Female	49	70.0
	Male	21	30.0
Position	Physician	26	37.14
	Nurse	22	31.43
	Midwife	22	31.43
Workplace	Family health center	42	60.0
	Public health center	20	28.57
	Cancer screening center	5	7.14
	Family planning center	3	4.29
Natural Hair Color	Sandy red, blonde	9	12.86
	Chestnut or dark blond	11	15.72
	Brown	36	51.43
	Black	14	20.0
Eye color	Light colors (Blue, gray or green)	14	20.0
	Dark	25	35.71
	Brown	23	32.86
	Black	8	11.43
Natural skin color	Fair	9	12.86
	Pale	28	40.0
	Beige or olive	16	22.86
	Brown	11	15.71
	Dark brown	6	8.57
Freckles, moles	≥ 31	3	4.29
	11-30	37	52.86
	1-10	23	32.86
	None	7	10.0
Skin sensitive	Very sensitive, easily reacts	14	20.0
	Sensitive	15	21.43
	Reacts normal	39	55.71
	Very resistive, hardly reacts	2	2.86
Skin turns brown	Never/always burns	6	8.57
	Rarely	21	30.0
	Sometimes	25	35.71
	Frequently	12	17.14
	Always	6	8.57
A blood relative diagnosed with skin cancer	Yes	5	7.14
	No	65	92.86
Perception of skin cancer risk	Yes	39	55.71
	No	31	44.29
Skin cancer screening seeing a dermatologist	Yes	2	2.86
	No	68	97.14
Total		70	100.00

• *Results are expressed in n (%). Note: (n=70).

The participants’ knowledge and practices regarding skin cancer and skin self-examination (SSE); the mean score that the participating primary care providers obtained for the knowledge of skin cancer risk factors was 5.39 ± 1.61 (min: 0, max: 8). Of the risk factors, the ones that the participants were aware of most were having a fair skin (97.14%), life-time long-term exposure to sun rays (95.71%), and having a family history of skin cancer (91.43%). The risk factors of which the participants were least aware were the presence of birthmarks (24.29%), having had sunburn blisters (31.43%) and light eye color (34.29%).

The mean score the participants obtained for the knowledge of skin cancer symptoms was 10.47±2.73 (min: 0, max: 12). The symptoms of which the participants were most aware were changes in the color of congenital or acquired moles or skin spots (95.71%), increases in the size and thickness of congenital or acquired moles or skin spots (95.1%), and the bleeding of a mole or wound (90%). The symptom of which the participants were least aware was the itching of a mole (71.43%). The participants’ knowledge regarding skin cancer risks and symptoms are given in Table 2.

Table 2
– Knowledge of primary care providers about risks and symptoms of skin cancer –Çankırı, Turkey, 2016-2017.

Risk of skin cancer	True		False
	n*	%	n*	%
Light skin	61	97.14	9	12.86
Light eye color	24	34.29	46	65.71
Family history of skin cancer	64	91.43	6	8.57
Many freckles/moles	62	88.57	8	11.43
Birthmarks	17	24.29	53	75.71
Blistering sunburns	22	31.43	48	68.57
Tanning in solariums	60	85.71	10	14.29
Sun exposure/ultraviolet radiation	67	95.71	3	4.29
Symptoms of skin cancer
Unusual change on the skin that weren’t there before	63	90.0	7	10.0
Presence of a sore which does not heal	63	90.0	7	10.0
Change in color	67	95.71	3	4.29
An increase in size and thickness	67	95.71	3	4.29
Change on the surface of moles/freckles	64	91.43	6	8.57
Moles/freckles whose borders become irregular	62	88.57	8	11.43
Moles larger than 6 mm or the diameter of a pencil	61	87.14	9	12.86
Noticed new pigmentation/mole	51	72.86	19	27.14
Itching	50	71.43	17	28.57
Crusting	56	80.0	14	20.0
Disintegration	63	90.0	7	10.0
Bleeding	65	92.86	5	7.14

• * The total was not expressed since one participant selected more than one statement. Note: (n=70).

In Table 3, the participants’ knowledge and practices of skin self-examination are given. Of the participants, 14.29% had continuing education/workshop about SSE after graduation. Of the participants, 67.14% did not perform SSE. Of the participants who did not perform SSE, 61.7% did not perform SSE because they did not know what to look for. Of the participants, 41.3% were aware that SSE should be performed once a month, 87.14% and 60% knew that when performing SSE they should always use a full-length mirror or a hand-held mirror, respectively; and 97.14% pointed out that all parts of the body should be examined during SSE (Table 3).

Table 3
– Knowledge and practices of primary care providers about SSE – Çankırı, Turkey, 2016-2017.

Variables		n*	%
Knowledge of SSE	Yes	27	38.57
	No	43	61.43
Continuing education/ workshop about SSE	Yes	10	14.29
	No	60	85.71
How often should SSE be performed?	Once a week	6	8.57
	Once a month	29	41.43
	Once every six months	28	40.0
	Once a year	7	10.0
ABCDE rule	Yes	14	20.0
	No	56	80.0
Using a wall mirror	No	1	1.43
	Sometimes	8	11.43
	Yes, always	61	87.14
Using a hand mirror	No	4	5.71
	Sometimes	24	34.29
	Yes, always	42	60.0
Body parts in SSE	Only the body parts where there are moles	2	2.86
	All body parts	68	97.14
Performing SSE	Yes	23	32.86
	No	47	67.14
Reasons for not performing SSE	Don’t know what to look for	29	61.7
	Don’t have time	13	27.66
	I’m worried I will find something bad	5	10.64

• *The total was not expressed since one participant selected more than one statement.
• Note: (n=70).

DISCUSSION

Skin cancers which constitute nearly half of all cancer cases are the most common type of cancer. By raising societal awareness of skin cancer, morbidity and mortality due to skin cancer, which is common, can be reduced. Education is of great importance in raising awareness of the risks and symptoms of skin cancers and in their diagnosis and treatment. In this respect, health workers, in particular primary care providers, assume great tasks and responsibilities. This study was conducted to determine primary care providers’ knowledge and practices regarding the issue.

In the present study, one in four participants had light skin, one in five participants had light-colored eyes and four in ten participants had more than 10 moles. In the literature, it is indicated that light hair color, light eyes and the presence of more than one mole/freckle increase the risk of skin cancer^(10-11,22). In light of this literature data, a significant part of the participants were at risk of developing skin cancer because they had light skin and color eyes. More than half of the participants in the present study stated that they considered themselves at risk for skin cancer. In several studies conducted on the issue, it has been reported that an individual’s perception of risk affects his/her health behavior, medical decision-making and acquisition of health information^(23-26). In the current study, although more than half of the participants considered themselves at risk of skin cancer, the rate of those who visited a dermatologist was low. In a study conducted in Turkey, 67.3% of the physicians did not visit a dermatologist for skin cancer screening⁽¹⁹⁾. These results suggest that health workers who do not adopt disease prevention methods do not recommend these methods to their patients or do not refer them to a dermatologist. It is clear that not only should healthcare professionals encourage their patients to pay regular visits to a dermatologist but they also should pay more attention to their own skin health.

In the present study, although the participants’ scores for their knowledge about the skin cancer symptoms were high, their scores for knowledge about skin cancer risks were lower than expected. It is noteworthy that more than half of the participants did not know the relationship between skin cancer and risk factors such as birthmarks, sunburn blisters and light eye color. In a study conducted in North Carolina, 23% of the participants reported that they were aware of skin cancer risks⁽²⁷⁾. In a study conducted in Morocco, 66.7% of the participants had never heard of skin cancer before, and 18% of them had moderate levels of knowledge about skin cancer⁽²⁸⁾.

In three similar studies^{(2 9-31)} it was reported that the participants’ knowledge levels about skin cancer were low. However, given the fact that the aforementioned studies were conducted with patients rather than healthcare workers, the importance of the results of the present study becomes even more obvious.

Primary care providers should appreciate the importance of gathering a detailed patient history to identify patients with the highest risk of developing skin cancer^(23-24). Awareness of the risks and symptoms of skin cancers and of the ways to prevent skin cancer play an important role in avoiding behaviors posing risks in the development of cancer and in taking the necessary precautions⁽²³⁾. Accordingly, the importance of providing information and raising awareness about skin cancer whose incidence is on the rise becomes more evident. In the literature, it is reported that if health workers are aware of skin cancer risk factors and adopt SSE practices, they would have an advantage in accessing a large population in terms of taking precautions to prevent skin cancer⁽³²⁾.

In the present study, although a significant number of the primary care providers knew when and how often SSE should be performed and which parts of the body should be examined, they did not perform SSE because they did not know how to do it. A study⁽³³⁾ reported that health care workers’ skin cancer and sun protection behaviors were not different from those of patients, although they knew the importance of the improvement of health and primary prevention. In studies conducted in Mediterranean countries, it has been determined that although primary care physicians are well aware of recommendations on sun protection, their skin cancer and sun protection practices are inadequate^(32,34).

That the rate of the participants who performed SSE was lower than expected in the current study supports the findings in the relevant literature, which suggests that the health workers who participated in the present research were inadequate about SSE in general and they needed training on the issue. Only a small proportion of the participants (14%) participated in post-graduate training on skin cancer and SSE. The participants’ inadequate participation rate in post-graduate continuing education and workshops regarding SSE might be associated with the fact that they did not know what to look for in SSE. If health workers are to teach primary and secondary skin cancer prevention tips to the public, first of all, they should know and implement them. Inadequate precautionary behaviors of health workers to protect themselves from skin cancer may lead to failures in role modeling, and provision of information and counseling to people.

The limitations of this study are that it was carried out with only those working in primary healthcare centers in one city. The results cannot be generalized to all health professionals in the country. The results of the study were based on self-reported data. On the other hand, the questionnaire was considered a valid and reliable tool to measure health professionals’ knowledge and practices regarding skin cancer and SSE.

CONCLUSION

The present study aimed at determining whether the knowledge and practices of primary care providers about skin cancer and SSE contributed to the determination of their health behaviors towards skin cancer.

Although the participants’ knowledge of skin cancer symptoms was adequate, their knowledge of skin cancer risk factors was not sufficient. It was also determined that their knowledge of SSE was good but SSE practices were inadequate. Another point determined in the study was that very few of the participants performed SSE and that although they considered themselves at risk for skin cancer; the great majority of them did not visit a dermatologist. In light of these results obtained from the present study, it was concluded that healthcare professionals’ knowledge and practices of SSE should be improved, because the main task of healthcare workers is to implement preventive health services, and to inform and guide society. According to estimates, until 2030, the rate of cancer worldwide is expected to double. While 80% of cancer patients are in low and middle income countries, these countries receive only 10% of the total funds spent on cancer globally. For this reason, early diagnosis and screening programs should be emphasized. Working on early diagnosis of cancer and conducting public education in this regard is among the tasks of primary health care workers in Turkey. Within this context, health workers should teach people how to perform SSE in order to detect skin cancer and what to observe in this examination and should enhance their knowledge of SSE and raise awareness of SSE. Therefore, it is important for health workers, who are role models in society, to have adequate knowledge and practice about skin cancer, and to be aware of the risks and symptoms of skin cancers and of the ways to prevent them. Patient assessment is important for the detection of skin cancer in primary care. Continuing education is the way in which healthcare workers gather new knowledge and practices. Therefore, organizing post-graduation training and certification programs for health workers will positively contribute to the community’s health. After which, if they have knowledge and skills they can become public counselors and educators. It may be recommended to perform further studies with a larger sample to determine health workers’ levels of knowledge and prevention practices related to skin cancers in Turkey. Because the determination of knowledge and practices of primary care providers who are to encourage people to participate in campaigns on skin cancer prevention will be effective in planning interventions, the results of this study are expected to shed light on attempts to be planned to prevent skin cancer in the future.

REFERENCES

• ¹
  Kyle JW, Hammitt JK, Lim HW, Geller AC, Hall-Jordan LH, Maibach EW, et al. Economic evaluation of the US Environmental Protection Agency’s SunWise program: sun protection education for young children. Pediatrics. 2008;121(5):e1074-84.
• ²
  De Gruijl FR. Skin cancer and solar UV radiation. Eur J Cancer. 1999;35(14):2003-9.
• ³
  Tuong W, Cheng LS, Armstrong AW. Melanoma: epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes. Dermatol Clin. 2012;30(1):113-24.
• ⁴
  World Health Organization. Skin cancers. How common is skin cancer? [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2017 [cited 2017 Apr 11]. Available from: http://www.who.int/uv/faq/skincancer/en/index1.html
  » http://www.who.int/uv/faq/skincancer/en/index1.html
• ⁵
  Shack L, Jordan C, Thomson CS, Mak V, Møller H. Variation in incidence of breast, lung and cervical cancer and malignant melanoma of skin by socioeconomic group in England. BMC Cancer [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2017 Apr 11];8:271. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2577116/
  » https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2577116/
• ⁶
  World Health Organization; International Agency for Research on Cancer. GLOBOCAN 2008: cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2010.
• ⁷
  Turkey. Ministry of Health of Turkey. Turkey Cancer Statistics. Turkey: Ankara; 2017.
• ⁸
  Barbaric J, Sekerija M, Agius D, Coza D, Dimitrova N, Demetriou A, et al. Disparities in melanoma incidence and mortality in South-Eastern Europe: increasing incidence and divergent mortality patterns. Is progress around the corner? Eur J Cancer. 2016;55:47-55.
• ⁹
  Baykal C, Atci T, Akay BN. Is the frequency of primary cutaneous melanoma increasing in Turkey? An evaluation of the experiences of two dermatology centers. J Oncol Sci. 2017:1-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jons.2017.11.002
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jons.2017.11.002
• ¹⁰
  Baum A, Cohen L. Successful behavioral interventions to prevent cancer: the example of skin cancer. Annu Rev of Public Health. 1998;19:319-33.
• ¹¹
  Emmons KM, Geller AC, Viswanath V, Rutsch L, Zwirn J, Gorham S, et al. The SunWise Policy intervention for school-based sun protection: a pilot study. J Sch Nurs. 2008;24(4): 215-21.
• ¹²
  Fehér K, Cercato MC, Prantner I, Dombi Z, Burkali B, Paller J, et al. Skin cancer risk factors among primary school children: investigations in Western Hungary. Prev Med. 2010;51(3-4):320-4.
• ¹³
  Heckman CJ, Coups EJ. Correlates of sunscreen use among high school students: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2017 Oct 13];11:679. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3179453/
  » https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3179453/
• ¹⁴
  National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Basal cell and squamous cell skin cancers [Internet]. Washington: NCCN; 2012 [cited 2017 Apr 13]. Available from: http://pic2.cmt.com.cn/WebImages/Res/20130528/20130528_44232c3f-7105-48a1-8e30-b49a4cdca3e6.pdf
  » http://pic2.cmt.com.cn/WebImages/Res/20130528/20130528_44232c3f-7105-48a1-8e30-b49a4cdca3e6.pdf
• ¹⁵
  American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2017 [Internet]. Atlanta; 2017 [cited 2017 Oct 17]. Available from: https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2017/cancer-facts-and-figures-2017.pdf
  » https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2017/cancer-facts-and-figures-2017.pdf
• ¹⁶
  Australia. The Cancer Council. National cancer prevention policy 2007-2009 [Internet]. Sydney; 2010 [cited 2017 Oct 17]. Available from: http://www.cancer.org.au/content/pdf/CancerControlPolicy/NationalCancerPreventionPolicy/NCPP07-09-FULL.pdf
  » http://www.cancer.org.au/content/pdf/CancerControlPolicy/NationalCancerPreventionPolicy/NCPP07-09-FULL.pdf
• ¹⁷
  Koştu N, Erkin Ö, Bayık Temel A. Turkish version of skin self examination form: validity study [Internet]. Dokuz Eylül University; 2014 [cited 2017 Oct 17]. Available from: http://acikerisim.deu.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/12345/4524
  » http://acikerisim.deu.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/12345/4524
• ¹⁸
  Özçam H, Çimen G, Uzunçakmak C, Aydın S, Özcan T, Boran B. Evaluation of the knowledge, attitude, and behavior of female health workers about breast cancer, cervical cancer, and routine screening tests. Istanbul Med J. 2014;15(3):154-60.
• ¹⁹
  Uslu M, Karaman G, Şavk E, Şendur N. Investigation of knowledge about sun effects, skin cancer and sun protection behaviour among doctors in Adnan Menderes Hospital. Meandros Med Dent J. 2006;7(1):5-10.
• ²⁰
  Balyacı OE, Koştu N, Temel AB. Training program to raise consciousness among adolescents for protection against skin cancer through performance of skin self examination. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(10):5011-7.
• ²¹
  Erkin Ö, Ardahan M, Temel AB. Effects of creating awareness through photographs and posters on skin self-examination in nursing students. J Cancer Educ. 2018;33(1):52-8.
• ²²
  Cokkinides VE, Weinstock MA, O’Connell MC, Thun MJ. Use of indoor tanning sunlamps by US youth, ages 11–18 years, and by their parent or guardian caregivers: prevalence and correlates. Pediatrics. 2002;109(6):1124-30.
• ²³
  Lucas AS, Chung E, Marchetti MA, Marghoob AA. A guide for dermatology nurses to assist in the early detection of skin cancer. J Nurs Educ Pract. 2016;6(10):71.
• ²⁴
  Gordon R. Skin cancer: Increasing awareness and screening in primary care. Nurse Pract. 2014;39(5):48-54.
• ²⁵
  Janda M, Youl PH, Lowe JB, Elwood M, Ring IT, Aitken JF. Attitudes and intentions in relation to skin checks for early signs of skin cancer. Prevent Med. 2004;39(1):11-8.
• ²⁶
  Öncel S, Gündoğdu D. The Effect on the sun protection behaviour of skin cancer risk perception: systematic review. Turkish Clin J Public Health Nurs Special Topics. 2017; 3(1):52-60.
• ²⁷
  Roman C, Lugo-Somolinos A, Thomas N. Skin cancer knowledge and skin self-examinations in the Hispanic population of North Carolina: the patient’s perspective. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149(1):103-4.
• ²⁸
  Baybay H, Atassi M, Elfakir S, Gallouj S, Meziane M, Mernissi FZ. Skin cancer knowledge and attitudes in the region of Fez, Morocco: a cross-sectional study. BMC Dermatol. 2017;17(1): 2.
• ²⁹
  Alberg AJ, Herbst R, Genkinger JM, Duszynski KR. Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors toward skin cancer in Maryland youths. J Adolesc Health. 2002;31(4):372-7.
• ³⁰
  Korta DZ, Saggar V, Wu TP, Sanchez M. Racial differences in skin cancer awareness and surveillance practices at a public hospital dermatology clinic. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014; 70(2):312-7.
• ³¹
  Kaminska-Winciorek G, Wydmanski J, Gajda Tukiendorf A. Melanoma awareness and prevalence of dermoscopic examination among internet users: a cross-sectional survey. Postepy Dermatol Allergol. 2016;33(6):421-8.
• ³²
  Troya Martín M, Padilla-España L, Férnandez-Morano T, Delgado-Sánchez N, Sánchez NB, Rivas-Ruiz F, et al. Sun protection habits and attitudes among healthcare personnel in a Mediterranean population. J Cancer Educ. 2016;31(4):789-95.
• ³³
  Darling M, Ibbotson SH. Sun awareness and behaviour in healthcare professionals and the general public. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2002;27(6):442-4.
• ³⁴
  Isvy A, Beauchet A, Saiag P, Mahé E. Medical students and sun prevention: knowledge and behaviours in France. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013;27(2):274-51.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  04 Oct 2018
• Date of issue
  2018

History

• Received
  18 Oct 2017
• Accepted
  27 Feb 2018