Abstract
The understanding of borders as essentially obstructive devices, as reflected in the image of walls, represents only a simplifying perception that has nevertheless been successfully disseminated. Borders and walls are not two words for the same concept. The functions attributed to one and the other are different: the primary function of borders, unlike walls, is not to prevent exchanges, but to regulate transits. This article explores the normative reasons for establishing a supportive migration regime that offers an alternative to the current predominant border shielding.
Keywords
borders; walls; migration policy; national populism; open borders