Disseminated Clonal Complex 5 (CC5) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus SCCmec type II in a tertiary hospital of Southern Brazil

ABSTRACT

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is one of the leading causes of human infections worldwide, with major dominant lineage circulating in particular geographical regions. The Brazilian Epidemic Clone (BEC, SCCmec III, ST 239) has been predominant in most Brazilian hospitals. Here, we report the prevalence of MRSA SCCmec type II exhibiting different STs, most of them belonging to CC5 in a tertiary hospital in Southern Brazil.

MRSA; Multi-drug resistance; PVL; Toxic shock syndrome toxin; Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Staphylococcus aureus can asymptomatically colonize various human body sites. However, it is also an important human pathogen that causes a wide diversity of infections, ranging from minor skin and soft tissue infection to life-threatening conditions. This bacterium has developed numerous mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance, limiting the treatment options for staphylococcal infections¹. The acquisition of the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec), carrying the mec (A or C) genes and the site-specific cassette chromosome recombinase (ccr) genes (ccrAB or/and ccrC), plays a pivotal role in the antimicrobial resistance of S. aureus. The mec genes encode a specific penicillin-binding protein (PBP2a or PBP2’) with significantly lower affinity to β-lactams. In addition, multiple antibacterial-resistant and heavy metal-resistant encoding genes can be inserted into this cassette by site-specific recombination¹.

Currently, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) is responsible for a high proportion of staphylococcal infections in both community and hospital settings². Particularly in Latin America, MRSA is highly prevalent in hospitals and circulating MRSA clones can vary according to the geographic regions². Remarkably, the Brazilian Epidemic Clone (BEC, ST 239, SCCmec III), first detected in Brazil in the 1990s³, has been predominant in most Brazilian hospitals⁴. However, changes in the population structure of MRSA have also been reported in some hospitals in this country. Caiaffa-Filho et al.⁵ reported the prevalence of MRSAs harboring SCCmec type II in a hospital of Sao Paulo. The USA800/ Pediatric (ST5, SCCmec IV) and USA400/ MW2/WA-1 (ST1, SCCmec IV) were the most predominant MRSA lineages in five hospitals of Rio de Janeiro⁶. On the other hand, the USA100 (formerly designated as New York/Japan clone/ST5/ CC5/ SCCmec II) associated with multidrug resistance was the predominant MRSA lineage in a military hospital, whereas polyclonal and non-multidrug resistant MRSA isolates were detected in a teaching hospital of Rio de Janeiro⁷. Arias et al.² reported prevalence higher than 80% of USA100 in three Brazilian hospitals located in the cities of Sao Paulo and Porto Alegre.

The University Hospital of Londrina (UHL) is a teaching hospital and a major referral center in the North of Parana State, Brazil, for the Sistema Unico de Saude (SUS), a governmental public health system. This is a 313-bed tertiary care center that serves the city of Londrina, besides about 250 localities of Parana State and more than 100 cities from other States, mainly in Sao Paulo, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul and Rondonia. The number of MRSA isolates detected in this hospital has increased over the years. Here, we report the prevalence of MRSA CC5/ SCCmec II in the UHL.

A total of 59 non-duplicate MRSAs isolated from inpatients with diagnosis of bloodstream and respiratory tract infections during 2015-2016 were taken from the bacterial collection of the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory of UHL.

Ethics Committee on Research Involving Human Beings of Universidade Estadual de Londrina (CAAE Nº 78657317.0.0000.5231 CEP-UEL) approved the study protocols. The isolates were recovered from tracheal aspirates (n=44) and blood (n=15). Species identification was based on the phenotypic profile generated by the VITEK^® 2 Compact using VITEK^® 2 GP ID card and OBSERVA^® Integrated Data Management software version 04.03 (bioMérieux- Durham, NC, USA). At the same time, Gram staining, catalase, DNase and mannitol fermentation were also determined. Antimicrobial susceptibility for cefoxitin (30 µg), erythromycin (15 µg), clindamycin (2 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (23.75/1.25 μg), rifampicin (5 μg), linezolide (10 μg) and tigecycline (15 μg) was determined by disk diffusion assay according to Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)⁸. The susceptibility breakpoints used were those recommended by the CLSI⁸, except for tigecycline that was interpreted according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST)⁹. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of vancomycin was determined by Etest^® (ABBiodisk, Solna, Sweden). Cefoxitin was used to define MRSA phenotypically⁸.

All isolates were susceptible to rifampicin, sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, linezolide and tigecycline. All isolates were resistant to oxacillin, erythromycin, clindamycin and ciprofloxacin, except one that exhibited resistance only to oxacillin. Resistance to gentamicin was detected in two isolates. The vancomycin MIC ranged from to 0.5 to 2.0 µg/mL. The mechanism of methicillin resistance is mediated by the mecA gene for most isolates (52/59, 88.1%), as judged by the results of multiplex-PCR assay¹⁰. Seven (11.9%) isolates did not harbor the mecA gene.

Besides the synthesis of modified PBP2a mediated by mecA gene, other mechanisms may be related to methicillin resistance in S. aureus: a) the presence of divergent mecA homologue known as mecC (formerly mecA_LGA251 gene) that was detected in MRSAs isolated from animals and humans¹; b) the presence of a plasmid-encoded mecB gene that has recently been described in one MRSA recovered from surveillance cefoxitin-based nasal screening in a German hospital¹¹; c) point mutations in genes encoding PBP 1, 2 and 3, resulting in amino acid substitutions in the transpeptidase domains of these proteins¹²; d) hyperproduction of beta-lactamase that partially hydrolyses penicillinase-resistant penicillin, such as methicillin¹³.

By using the multiplex-PCR described by Milheiriço et al.¹⁰, mecA harboring MRSA isolates (n=52) were distributed into four SCCmec types. Remarkably, the predominance of SCCmec type II (34/52, 65.4%) was observed among the MRSA isolates. Eight (15.4%) isolates each were classified as SCCmec type I and IV. One (1.9%) isolate harbored the SCCmec type III and one (1.9%) was untypeable. We used the High-Resolution Melting (HRM) analysis of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs), as described by Lilliebridge et al.¹⁴ to further investigate the clonal relatedness among SCCmec type II MRSAs. Twelve different sequence types (STs) were detected, which include ST5 (n=3), ST6 (n=2), ST9 (n=2), ST27 (n=2), ST53 (n=2), ST63 (n=7), ST99 (n=2), ST306 (n=3), ST445 (n=5), ST835 (n=4), ST1307 (n=1) and ST1502 (n=1). Based on STs similarities, these MRSAs were clustered into five clonal complexes (CC) (Table 1). The majority of MRSA SCCmec II isolates belonged to CC5 (n=23, 67.6%), which has been commonly associated with human infections worldwide^2,15.

Table 1
Molecular characteristics and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of 34 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus SCCmec type II isolated in 2015-2016

Isolate	CCa	STa	PVLb	tst-1b	Antibiotypec	Yeard	Sourcee	Vancomycin µg/mLg
110	7	306	-	-	II	2015	T	1.5
138	5	835	+	-	II	2015	T	2.0
160	7	306	+	-	II	2015	T	1.5
165	5	63	+	-	II	2015	T	1.5
175	80	1502	-	-	II	2015	T	2.0
176	5	835	+	-	II	2015	T	2.0
177	5	63	-	-	II	2015	T	1.5
185	5	63	-	-	II	2015	T	1.5
193	5	63	-	-	II	2015	B	2.0
209	5	5	-	-	II	2015	T	1.5
211	5	835	+	-	I	2015	B	1.5
215	5	63	-	-	II	2015	B	2.0
219	5	63	-	-	II	2015	T	1.5
265	7	306	-	-	II	2015	T	2.0
332	5	835	+	-	II	2015	T	2.0
352	5	6	-	-	II	2015	T	1.5
353	5	27	-	-	II	2015	T	1.5
356	5	9	-	-	II	2015	T	2.0
369	5	27	-	-	II	2015	T	1.5
374	5	9	+	-	II	2015	B	1.5
411	5	6	-	-	II	2015	T	2.0
413	5	99	-	-	II	2015	T	1.5
415	5	5	-	-	II	2015	B	1.5
419	5	63	-	-	II	2015	T	1.5
437	5	5	-	-	II	2015	T	2.0
453	5	1307	-	-	II	2016	T	2.0
465	1290	53	-	-	III	2016	T	1.0
483	445	445	-	-	II	2016	T	2.0
484	1290	53	-	-	II	2016	B	2.0
492	445	445	-	-	II	2016	T	2.0
577	445	445	-	-	II	2016	T	1.5
578	445	445	-	-	II	2016	T	1.5
631	5	99	-	-	II	2016	B	2.0
657	445	445	-	-	II	2016	T	1.5

• ^aCC: Clonal Complex and ST: Sequence Typing were determined as described by Lilliebridge et al.14; ^bPVL: Panton Valentine Leukocidin encoding gene and tst-1: Toxic Shock Syndrome Toxin encoding gene were detected as described in Oliveira et al.16; ^cAntimicrobial resistance profile was determined by disk-diffusion assay according to the CLSI guidelines8- I: OXA; II: OXA, ERI, CLI, CIP; III: OXA, ERI, CLI, CIP, GN; OXA: Oxacillin, CLI: Clindamycin, ERI: Erithromycin, CIP: Ciprofloxacin; GN: Gentamicin; ^dYear of isolation; ^eSource of isolation, T: Tracheal secretion, B: Blood; ^fMIC vancomycin determined by E-test; - Absence; + Presence.

Recent studies of our research group have reported the predominance of MRSA harboring SCCmec II elements isolated from different clinical sources in the UHL during 2010 to 2013. Prevalences of 53.7% (66 out of 123 MRSAs isolates) and of 43.6% (24 out of 55 MRSAs isolates) were described by Oliveira et al.¹⁶ and Bodnar et al.¹⁷, respectively. In both studies, most isolates were also resistant to erythromycin, clindamycin and ciprofloxacin. In contrast to our results, both studies reported MRSA isolates showing intermediate resistance to vancomycin. Of note, there was a substantial proportion of MRSAs exhibiting MIC values equal or higher than 1.5 µg/mL for vancomycin. Although these isolates are reported to be susceptible, data from the literature suggest that patients with MRSA infections presenting these MIC values respond poorly to vancomycin¹.

We also investigated the presence of genes lukS-PV and lukF-PV and tst-1 in SCCmec type II MRSAs by PCR as described previously¹⁵. Seven SCCmec type II isolates (20.6%) harbored the PVL-encoding genes, which contrast with the results of de Oliveira et al.¹⁵ that detected these genes only in MRSA SCCmec type IV (3/123, 2.4%). The lukS-PV and lukF-PV encode the β-pore-forming cytotoxic Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL), a secreted toxin that has been associated with S. aureus skin and soft tissue infections, necrotizing pneumonia and septic shock. These genes are encoded by bacteriophages, which can contribute for their dissemination among MRSA strains¹⁸. In contrast, none MRSA SCCmec type II harbored the tst-1 gene in this study, whereas this gene was detected in 5.7% (7 out of 123) of MRSA harboring the same SCCmec elements in our previous study¹⁶. The tst-1 gene encodes the toxic shock syndrome toxin (TSST-1), a member of bacterial superantigen family, which induces a massive activation of monocytes/macrophages and T lymphocyte host cells, leading to a potentially fatal toxic shock syndrome. This gene is located in a mobile pathogenicity island which uses bacteriophage-mediated transfer for its mobilization¹⁹. The contribution of a horizontal gene transfer for the bacterial adaptation in a determined niche has been well-studied. However, the role of gene loss in bacterial fitness has received less attention, thus further studies are needed to understand this phenomenon.

The relatively small number of isolates, the samples origin (tracheal aspirates and blood) and detection of two virulence-encoding genes by PCR are the limitations of our study, which may reduce the generalization of results. Nevertheless, this study reports the predominance of MRSA SCCmec type II exhibiting different STs, most of which belong to CC5 in UHL. The SCCmec type II remained relatively stable over the five years period studied by our research group; however, an increase in the presence of PVL- and the absence of TSST-encoding genes were detected among these strains. Due to the mobility of MGEs, new patterns of antibiotic resistance and virulence can emerge, and then continuous surveillance of S. aureus and of these traits are crucial for the development of preventive and therapeutic approaches for the treatment of infections caused by this bacterium. Corroborating this, a recent study of Wang et al.¹⁵ showed that CC5 isolates, SCCmec type II and erythromycin resistance are independent risk factor associated with 30-day mortality of patients with MRSA infections. In addition, a higher risk of death has been reported in patients with pneumonia caused by PVL-positive S. aureus, compared to non-PVL producing isolates²⁰.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

FC Duarte was supported by a student scholarship from Fundação Araucária - PR; SF Yamada-Ogatta was supported by a research fellowship from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq); ER Tavares was supported by a Post-Doctoral fellowship from Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES).

REFERENCES

• ¹
  Hiramatsu K, Katayama Y, Matsuo M, Sasaki T, Morimoto Y, Sekiguchi A, et al. Multi-drug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and future chemotherapy. J Infect Chemother. 2014;20:593-601.
• ²
  Arias CA, Reyes J, Carvajal LP, Rincon S, Diaz L, Panesso D, et al. A prospective cohort multicenter study of molecular epidemiology and phylogenomics of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in nine Latin American countries. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61:e00816-17.
• ³
  Sader HS, Pignatari AC, Hollis RJ, Jones RN. Evaluation of interhospital spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Sao Paulo, Brazil, using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of chromosomal DNA. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1994;15:320-3.
• ⁴
  Andrade-Figueiredo M, Leal-Balbino TC. Clonal diversity and epidemiological characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus: high prevalence of oxacillin-susceptible mecA-positive Staphylococcus aureus (OS-MRSA) associated with clinical isolates in Brazil. BMC Microbiol. 2016;16:115.
• ⁵
  Caiaffa-Filho HH, Trindade PA, Cunha PG, Alencar CS, Prado GV, Rossi F, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carrying SCCmec type II was more frequent than the Brazilian endemic clone as a cause of nosocomial bacteremia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013;76:518-20.
• ⁶
  Zuma AV, Lima DF, Assef AP, Marques EA, Leão RS. Molecular characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from blood in Rio de Janeiro displaying susceptibility profiles to non-β-lactam antibiotics. Braz J Microbiol. 2017;48:237-41.
• ⁷
  Chamon RC, Ribeiro SD, Costa TM, Nouér SA, Dos Santos KR. Complete substitution of the Brazilian endemic clone by other methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus lineages in two public hospitals in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Braz J Infect Dis. 2017;21:185-9.
• ⁸
  Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 28th ed. Wayne: CLSI; 2018.
• ⁹
  European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 8.1, valid from 2018-05-15. [cited 2018 June 7]. Available from: http://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/Breakpoint_tables/v_8.1_Breakpoint_Tables.pdf
  » http://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/Breakpoint_tables/v_8.1_Breakpoint_Tables.pdf
• ¹⁰
  Milheiriço C, Oliveira DC, Lencastre H. Update to the multiplex PCR strategy for assignment of mec element types in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51:3374-7.
• ¹¹
  Becker K, van Alen S, Idelevich EA, Schleimer N, Seggewib J, Mellmann A, et al. Plasmid-encoded transferable mecB-mediated methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24:242-8.
• ¹²
  Ba X, Harrison EM, Edwards GF, Holden MT, Larsen AR, Petersen A, et al. Novel mutations in penicillin-binding protein genes in clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates that are methicillin resistant on susceptibility testing, but lack the mec gene. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69:594-7.
• ¹³
  McDougal LK, Thornsberry C. The role of beta-lactamase in staphylococcal resistance to penicillinase-resistant penicillins and cephalosporins. J Clin Microbiol. 1986;23:832-9.
• ¹⁴
  Lilliebridge RA, Tong SY, Giffard PM, Holt DC. The utility of high-resolution melting analysis of SNP nucleated PCR amplicons: an MLST based Staphylococcus aureus typing scheme. PLoS One. 2011;6:e19749.
• ¹⁵
  Wang M, Zheng Y, Mediavilla JR, Chen L, Kreiswirth BN, Song Y, et al. Hospital dissemination of tst-1-positive Clonal Complex 5 (CC5) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:101.
• ¹⁶
  Oliveira CF, Morey AT, Santos JP, Gomes LV, Cardoso JD, Pinge-Filho P, et al. Molecular and phenotypic characteristics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from hospitalized patients. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2015;9:743-51.
• ¹⁷
  Bodnar GC, Martins HM, Oliveira CF, Morey AT, Tavares ER, Cardoso JD, et al. Comparison of HRM analysis and three REP-PCR genomic fingerprint methods for rapid typing of MRSA at a Brazilian hospital. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2016;10:1306-17.
• ¹⁸
  Spaan NA, van Strijp JA, Torres VJ. Leukocidins: staphylococcal bi-component pore-forming toxins find their receptors. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017;15:435-47.
• ¹⁹
  Novick RP, Christie GE, Penadés JR. The phage-related chromosomal islands of Gram-positive bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8:541-51.
• ²⁰
  Gillet Y, Issartel B, Vanhems P, Fournet JC, Lina G, Bes M, et al. Association between Staphylococcus aureus strains carrying gene for Panton-Valentine leukocidin and highly lethal necrotizing pneumonia in young immunocompetent patients. Lancet. 2002;359:753-9.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  19 July 2018
• Date of issue
  2018

History

• Received
  5 Feb 2018
• Accepted
  7 June 2018