Validity evidence of the Brazilian version of the Assessment Interprofessional Collaborative Leadership Scale

Silva, Natalia Dalforno da; Gonçalves, Geisa Colebrusco de Souza; Silva, Jaqueline Alcantara Marcelino da; Rebustini, Flávio; Balsanelli, Alexandre Pazetto

doi:10.1590/1518-8345.7894.4719

person Natalia Dalforno da Silva

Study concept and design · Obtaining data · Data analysis and interpretation · Statistical analysis · Drafting the manuscript · Critical review of the manuscript as to its relevant intellectual content · All authors approved the final version of the text

schoolUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Enfermagem, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.schoolHospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

0000-0002-6646-8090

person Geisa Colebrusco de Souza Gonçalves

Study concept and design · Obtaining data · Data analysis and interpretation · Statistical analysis · Drafting the manuscript · Critical review of the manuscript as to its relevant intellectual content · All authors approved the final version of the text

schoolUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Enfermagem, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

0000-0003-4714-9462

person Jaqueline Alcantara Marcelino da Silva

Study concept and design · Obtaining data · Data analysis and interpretation · Statistical analysis · Drafting the manuscript · Critical review of the manuscript as to its relevant intellectual content · All authors approved the final version of the text

schoolUniversidade Federal de São Carlos, Departamento de Enfermagem, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.

0000-0002-8307-8609

person Flávio Rebustini

Study concept and design · Obtaining data · Data analysis and interpretation · Statistical analysis · Drafting the manuscript · Critical review of the manuscript as to its relevant intellectual content · All authors approved the final version of the text

schoolUniversidade de São Paulo, Escola de Ciências, Humanidades e Artes, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

0000-0002-3746-3266

person Alexandre Pazetto Balsanelli

Study concept and design · Obtaining data · Data analysis and interpretation · Statistical analysis · Drafting the manuscript · Critical review of the manuscript as to its relevant intellectual content · All authors approved the final version of the text

schoolUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Enfermagem, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

0000-0003-3757-1061

personCorresponding author: Natalia Dalforno da Silva E-mail:
n_dalforno@yahoo.com.br https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6646-8090

Conflict of interest:

the authors have declared that there is no conflict of interest

Associate Editor:

Rosana Aparecida Spadoti Dantas

Item after modification	Modification
Section 1: SYMBIOTIC RELATIONSHIP: Symbiotic relationship is a collaboration in which all team members have their own well-established roles and mutually adapt to the dynamics of changing demands.	Changed the word “ ambos ” to “ todos ” and changed the position of the word “ dinâmica ”
2. Encourages team members to value each other’s expertise.	The word “ competências ” was replaced by “expertise”
3. Encourages team members to bring their complementary capabilities (sharing knowledge, skills, and experiences) together to direct the care plan.	The word “ explorar ” was changed to “ aproximar ”, the order of the words “ compartilhando conhecimentos ” was reversed, and “ abordar o planejamento ” was changed to “ direcionar o plano ”.
Section 2: MINDFULNESS: Mindfulness is the sustained, conscious focus of attention on immediate experiences as they happen.	Added “Mindfulness” and changed the word “ intencional ” to “ consciente ”
7. Encourages team members to focus beyond the status quo (i.e., the usual way of doing things) on relevant and essential issues of care.	Changed “ ess ê ncia ” to “ essenciais ”
8. Encourages members to consider creative solutions for planning complex patient/client care.	Replaced “ atendimentos mais ” with “ cuidados ”
11. Is receptive to supporting changes suggested by team members.	The order of the word “ apoio ” has been inverted.
16. Encourages team members to set shared goals for teamwork.	Changed “ sobre seu ” to “ para o ”
21. Shares work among team members, according to their capabilities, when care plans are implemented.	Inverted word order at the beginning of the sentence.
22. Team members support patients/clients as collaborative leaders.	Changed “ apoiem ” to “ apoiam ”
24. All team members accept and take responsibility for their shared teamwork	Replaced “ responsabilidade ” with “ se responsabilizam ”
27. There is support for rotating the team leader according to the needs of our care planning.	Changed “ apoiemos ” to “ há apoio ” and “ conforme ” to “ de acordo ”.

Factor numbers	CFI *	Degrees of freedom	Scree test
0	0.00	378	0.00
1	0.99	350	250.61 *
2	1.00	323	0.00
3	1.00	297

Variables		I-UniCo *	I-ECV ^†	I-REAL ^‡
V ^§ 1. Helps members value their contributions to teamwork.		0.99	0.93	0.22
V ^§ 2. Encourages team members to value each other’s expertise.		0.99	0.92	0.23
V ^§ 3. Encourages team members to bring together their complementary capabilities (shared knowledge, skills, and experiences) to direct the care plan.		1.00	0.97	0.14
V ^§ 4. Allows all team members an opportunity to express their opinions.		1.00	0.98	0.11
V ^§ 5. Enables team members to see their shared results as meaningful and valuable.		0.99	0.95	0.20
V ^§ 6. Encourages team members to develop processes that lead to the creation of an environment where decision-making is shared.		1.00	0.99	0.08
V ^§ 7. Encourages team members to focus beyond the usual way of doing things, on relevant and essential issues of care.		1.00	0.98	0.13
V ^§ 8. Encourages members to consider creative solutions for planning complex patient/client care.		0.99	0.97	0.16
V ^§ 9. Encourages team members to reevaluate traditional ways of dealing with similar situations.		1.00	0.98	0.11
V ^§ 10. Encourages open discussions among team members about care planning issues.		1.00	0.99	0.04
V ^§ 11. Is receptive to supporting changes suggested by team members.		0.99	0.97	0.15
V ^§ 12. Encourages team members to adapt to different situations.		1.00	0.98	0.11
V ^§ 13. Encourages team members to question anything that doesn’t make sense.		1.00	0.97	0.12
V ^§ 14. Supports creative innovation of team members in situations where there is uncertainty in patient/client care planning.		1.00	0.98	0.10
V ^§ 15. Ensures that all team members have the opportunity to share their perspectives on patient/client care planning.		1.00	0.98	0.13
V ^§ 16. Encourages team members to set shared goals for teamwork.		1.00	0.99	0.05
V ^§ 17. Facilitates adjustments of team member roles to situational needs.		1.00	0.99	0.03
V ^§ 18. Encourages team members to take responsibility for their contributions to the team’s decision-making process.		1.00	0.99	0.06
V ^§ 19. Focuses on shared goals of all team members in the decision-making process.		1.00	0.97	0.14
V ^§ 20. Encourages the integration of perspectives to facilitate shared decision-making processes in developing the patient/client care plan.		1.00	0.99	0.06
V ^§ 21. Shares work among team members, according to their capabilities, when care plans are implemented.		1.00	0.99	0.05
V ^§ 22. Team members support patients/clients as collaborative leaders.		0.98	0.83	0.26
V ^§ 23. Team members are willing to take on a leadership role when asked.		0.93	0.72	0.43
V ^§ 24. All team members accept and take responsibility for their shared teamwork.		0.86	0.62	0.54
V ^§ 25. All team members accept and take responsibility for their shared teamwork.		0.76	0.54	0.58
V ^§ 26. Team members mentor each other so that everyone is able to lead the team effectively.		0.94	0.74	0.43
V ^§ 27. There is support for rotation of the team leader, according to the needs of our care planning.		0.98	0.85	0.30
V ^§ 28. We select our team leader together.		0.99	0.88	0.23
Assessment	General
UniCo ^\|\|	=	0.98
ECV ^¶	=	0.92
MIREAL**	=	0.19

Variables	Λ* Factor 1	Λ* Factor 2	Λ* Factor 3	Λ* Factor 4	h2 ^†
V ^‡ 1	0.91	-0.17	0.02	0.03	0.69
V ^‡ 2	0.94	0.02	-0.12	-0.10	0.72
V ^‡ 3	0.95	-0.09	0.03	-0.18	0.73
V ^‡ 4	0.63	-0.08	0.18	0.27	0.71
V ^‡ 5	0.88	-0.02	-0.02	0.04	0.76
V ^‡ 6	0.81	0.06	0.04	-0.09	0.70
V ^‡ 7	0.90	0.15	-0.07	-0.14	0.84
V ^‡ 8	0.80	0.12	-0.04	0.04	0.77
V ^‡ 9	0.78	0.08	0.02	0.01	0.72
V ^‡ 10	0.57	0.13	0.22	0.09	0.71
V ^‡ 11	0.60	0.07	0.06	0.32	0.74
V ^‡ 12	0.68	-0.02	0.13	0.20	0.72
V ^‡ 13	0.40	0.13	0.05	0.43	0.64
V ^‡ 14	0.33	0.40	-0.12	0.33	0.58
V ^‡ 15	0.72	0.16	0.01	0.18	0.85
V ^‡ 16	0.67	0.07	0.14	0.11	0.73
V ^‡ 17	0.58	0.15	0.12	0.15	0.71
V ^‡ 18	0.70	0.01	0.14	0.06	0.67
V ^‡ 19	0.75	0.09	0.01	0.08	0.73
V ^‡ 20	0.76	0.05	0.13	0.03	0.80
V ^‡ 21	0.46	0.07	0.32	0.30	0.80
V ^‡ 22	0.27	0.22	0.25	-0.10	0.37
V ^‡ 23	0.13	0.45	0.38	-0.12	0.64
V ^‡ 24	0.08	0.04	0.86	-0.04	0.84
V ^‡ 25	-0.06	0.01	0.90	0.06	0.78
V ^‡ 26	0.23	0.25	0.54	-0.15	0.71
V ^‡ 27	0.01	0.89	0.06	-0.01	0.86
V ^‡ 28	0.07	0.62	0.09	0.04	0.53

Variables	Λ *	h2 ^†
V ^‡ 1	0.78	0.61
V ^‡ 2	0.79	0.63
V ^‡ 3	0.80	0.64
V ^‡ 4	0.80	0.65
V ^‡ 5	0.84	0.72
V ^‡ 6	0.81	0.66
V ^‡ 7	0.87	0.76
V ^‡ 8	0.86	0.74
V ^‡ 9	0.84	0.70
V ^‡ 10	0.84	0.71
V ^‡ 11	0.82	0.68
V ^‡ 12	0.83	0.68
V ^‡ 13	0.72	0.52
V ^‡ 14	0.68	0.46
V ^‡ 15	0.90	0.83
V ^‡ 16	0.85	0.73
V ^‡ 17	0.84	0.71
V ^‡ 18	0.81	0.67
V ^‡ 19	0.84	0.71
V ^‡ 20	0.89	0.80
V ^‡ 21	0.86	0.74
V ^‡ 22	0.56	0.31
V ^‡ 23	0.68	0.46
V ^‡ 24	0.68	0.47
V ^‡ 25	0.61	0.37
V ^‡ 26	0.72	0.52
V ^‡ 27	0.70	0.49
V ^‡ 28	0.61	0.37

[1] *CFI = Comparative Fit Index

Validity evidence of the Brazilian version of the Assessment Interprofessional Collaborative Leadership Scale^*

Highlights:

Validity evidence of the Brazilian version of the Assessment Interprofessional Collaborative Leadership Scale*

Highlights:

Validity evidence of the Brazilian version of the Assessment Interprofessional Collaborative Leadership Scale^*