Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Conceptual differences in terms used in the scientific production of brazilian nursing

Abstracts

This is a bibliographic research about Brazilian scientific production in the last 17 years, carried out in the Virtual Health Library. This study aimed to analyze conceptual differences for the terms conceptual framework, reference framework, care method, assistance model, care model, care process and nursing process, proposing definitions for these terms based on the similarities described by the authors of the publications studied. Fifty-three (53) scientific productions were analyzed, which showed a lack of conceptual clarity among the terms, as well as similarities, differences, and use of synonyms, which can hamper the understanding of their meaning. The definition of the terms listed was based on the selected literature, in order to clarify them and contribute to their deeper understanding. In conclusion, it is needed to present proposals need to be presented that define and analyze the concepts, in order to be able to expand the knowledge base of nursing in Brazil, contributing to its advancement and consolidation.

Knowledge; Nursing; Nursing care; Nursing process


Pesquisa bibliográfica da produção científica brasileira dos últimos 17 anos, realizada na Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde. O estudo objetivou analisar diferenças conceituais para os termos marco conceitual, marco de referência, metodologia do cuidado, modelo de assistência, modelo de cuidado, processo de cuidar e processo de enfermagem e propor definições para os mesmos com base nas similaridades descritas pelos autores das publicações pesquisadas. Foram analisadas 53 produções que evidenciaram a inexistência de clareza conceitual entre os termos, além de similaridades, divergências e utilização de sinônimos, capazes de dificultar sua compreensão. Propôs-se a definição dos termos elencados com base na literatura selecionada a fim de clarificá-los e de contribuir para seu aprofundamento. Conclui-se que é necessário apresentar propostas que definam os conceitos e os analisem para poder ampliar a base de conhecimentos da enfermagem brasileira, contribuindo para seu avanço e consolidação.

Conhecimento; Enfermagem; Cuidados de enfermagem; Processos de enfermagem


Esta es una investigación bibliográfica de la producción científica en Brasil de los últimos 17 años, llevada a cabo entre los meses de agosto y septiembre de 2010, en la Biblioteca Virtual en Salud. El estudio tuvo como objetivo analizar las diferencias conceptuales de los términos marco conceptual, marco de referencia, metodología del cuidado, modelo de asistencia, modelo de cuidado, el proceso de cuidar y el proceso de enfermería y proponer definiciones para los mismos teniendo por base las semejanzas descritas por los autores de las publicaciones estudiadas. Se analizaron 53 producciones que evidenciaron la inexistencia de claridad conceptual entre los términos, además de algunas similitudes, divergencias y uso de sinónimos, lo cual puede dificultar su comprensión. Se ha propuesto la definición de los términos sobre la base de la literatura seleccionada con el objeto de aclararlos y de contribuir a su profundización. Se concluye que es necesario presentar propuestas que definan los conceptos y los analicen con el fin de ampliar la base de conocimientos de la enfermería brasileña, contribuyendo a su avance y consolidación.

Conocimiento; Enfermería; Atención de enfermería; Procesos de enfermería


LITERATURE REVIEWS

Conceptual differences in terms used in the scientific production of brazilian nursing

Diferencias conceptuales en términos utilizados en la producción científica de la enfermería brasileña

Luciane FaveroI; Marilene Loewen WallII; Maria Ribeiro LacerdaIII

IDoctorate student in Nursing, Graduate Nursing Program (PPGENF), Federal University of Paraná (UFPR). REUNI Grantee. Paraná, Brazil. E-mail: lucianefavero@yahoo.com.br

IIPh.D. in Nursing. Adjunct Professor, PPGENF/UFPR. Paraná, Brazil. E-mail: wall@ufpr.br

IIIPh.D. in Nursing. Coordinator, PPGENF/UFPR. Paraná, Brazil. E-mail: mlacerda@ufpr.br

Correspondence Correspondence: Luciane Favero Rua Urbano Lopes, 214 ap. 1901 A - Cristo Rei 80050-520, Curitiba, PR, Brasil E-mail: lucianefavero@yahoo.com.br

ABSTRACT

This is a bibliographic research about Brazilian scientific production in the last 17 years, carried out in the Virtual Health Library. This study aimed to analyze conceptual differences for the terms conceptual framework, reference framework, care method, assistance model, care model, care process and nursing process, proposing definitions for these terms based on the similarities described by the authors of the publications studied. Fifty-three (53) scientific productions were analyzed, which showed a lack of conceptual clarity among the terms, as well as similarities, differences, and use of synonyms, which can hamper the understanding of their meaning. The definition of the terms listed was based on the selected literature, in order to clarify them and contribute to their deeper understanding. In conclusion, it is needed to present proposals need to be presented that define and analyze the concepts, in order to be able to expand the knowledge base of nursing in Brazil, contributing to its advancement and consolidation.

Descriptors: Knowledge. Nursing. Nursing care. Nursing process.

RESUMEN

Esta es una investigación bibliográfica de la producción científica en Brasil de los últimos 17 años, llevada a cabo entre los meses de agosto y septiembre de 2010, en la Biblioteca Virtual en Salud. El estudio tuvo como objetivo analizar las diferencias conceptuales de los términos marco conceptual, marco de referencia, metodología del cuidado, modelo de asistencia, modelo de cuidado, el proceso de cuidar y el proceso de enfermería y proponer definiciones para los mismos teniendo por base las semejanzas descritas por los autores de las publicaciones estudiadas. Se analizaron 53 producciones que evidenciaron la inexistencia de claridad conceptual entre los términos, además de algunas similitudes, divergencias y uso de sinónimos, lo cual puede dificultar su comprensión. Se ha propuesto la definición de los términos sobre la base de la literatura seleccionada con el objeto de aclararlos y de contribuir a su profundización. Se concluye que es necesario presentar propuestas que definan los conceptos y los analicen con el fin de ampliar la base de conocimientos de la enfermería brasileña, contribuyendo a su avance y consolidación.

Descriptores: Conocimiento. Enfermería. Atención de enfermería. Procesos de enfermería.

INTRODUCTION

Mainly due to the work that nursing scientists, theorists and scholars have accomplished in the last four decades, nursing has been acknowledged as an emerging profession, an academic discipline and a science.1

The theoretical development that took place during that period largely derived from the efforts to construct its own set of knowledge, in an organized manner, which resulted in the creation and development of the nursing theories.

The theory of nursing can be defined as the conceptualization of some aspect of the nursing reality, with a view to describing the phenomena, explain the relations among them, foresee consequences or prescribe care.2

Thus, theory is a symbolic representation of aspects of reality, discovered or invented to describe, explain, foresee or prescribe answers, events, situations, conditions or relations. The theories contain concepts related to the phenomena within the discipline, and these concepts are mutually related to constitute theoretical assertions.2

Based on the theories, nursing care processes are established, which direct the routes that need to be followed to put the theoretical premises in practice in care delivery by baccalaureate nurses and other nursing team members. When the care process is theoretically underpinned and methodologically structured, it can be considered as different structures with a varying degree of abstraction and be classified as a care model, conceptual model, care method, among others.3

In general, the difference between conceptual model and theories is merely semantic. This fact can arouse various debates and confusions,4 making the theoretical development in nursing slow and more concerned with the method and process than with the actual contents of nursing knowledge.5-6

These conceptual issues are also present in other studies, including one undertaken almost 20 years ago, in which the authors already affirmed that there existed no clear definition for many terms used, neither in nursing practice nor in theory, but considered that: the terms 'framework', 'model' and 'system' are equivalent. The difference [...] is among the terms 'reference framework', 'theoretical' and 'conceptual', which are conceived at different complexity levels of abstraction".7:84-5

Hence, "the terms that name the knowledge structures, such as theory, conceptual model, care model, among others",3:8 indicate that there exists no consensus among the authors, mainly considering their uniqueness.

With a view to clarifying these conceptual issues, which are important and necessary to understand the knowledge structures in Nursing and, thus, to contribute to advances in knowledge construction, the aim in this study was to analyze the conceptual differences for the terms conceptual framework, reference framework, care method, assistance model, care model, care process and nursing process, as well as to propose specific definitions for each of the terms selected, based on the similarities described by the authors who were reviewed.

This justifies the initiative to construct definitions for the different concepts involved in nursing care practices and studies, with a view to expanding knowledge in the area and enhancing its understanding and the comprehension of its importance, as the existence of clear concepts in a discipline are fundamental for the advancement of the profession.

METHOD

A bibliographic research was undertaken about Brazilian scientific production between August and September 2010, in which the entire Brazilian production on the theme developed until the date of the research was investigated. The period between the first (1993) and the final (2010) text selected totaled 17 years. The following phases were followed:8 1) elaboration of the research project; 2) investigation of the solutions; 3) explanatory analysis of the solutions; and 4) integrative synthesis.

After the elaboration of the project, the investigation of the solutions started, which involved a bibliographic survey, besides initial, exploratory, selective, reflexive and interpretative reading to select the studies for analysis in the subsequent phase, understand the ideas each author present them and relate them with the research question.

The bibliographic survey was undertaken in the Virtual Health Library (VHL) and considered the following inclusion criteria: publications in Portuguese and originating in Brazil; full texts available on-line; and material available until the end of the data collection. The exclusion criteria were: repeated publications, from other countries or in other languages, whose full version was not available, and which did not address the concepts under analysis.

As none of the terms selected in considered a descriptor in the VHL's Health Sciences Descriptors, the related words - conceptual framework, reference framework, care method, assistance model, care model, care process and nursing process - were used for the search, without any combination.

After the initial reading,8 which refers to rapid reading to select the material that may contain information that is relevant for the theme, initially, 283 papers and one thesis were selected. The exploratory reading, which also involves rapid reading to verify whether the information is of actual interest to the study, resulted in the exclusion of 164 papers. After the selective reading, which serves to dispose of secondary data, another 50 repeated articles were removed. After the reflexive or critical reading, when the selected material is fully read in order to understand the authors' assertions,9 another 17 papers were excluded as they were conceptually inappropriate and evaded from the theme. Conceptual inappropriateness is considered as the use of a concept beyond the context that defines it, like publications that used care model to refer to the hegemonic medical model predominant in Brazilian health.

Thus, the final sample consisted of 52 articles and one thesis, to which further interpretative reading was applied. This is considered the most complex moment, aimed at relating the ideas the authors expressed about the research problem.9

To organize the reading process, an instrument was elaborated to collect information to identify the publication, data on the author and publication, data characteristic of the text, such as key words, objective, method and concepts used, as well as their definition.

Among the 53 scientific publications selected, seven were papers resulting from master's theses; three from doctoral dissertations; six were elaborated by Ph.D. graduates and stricto sensu graduate students; one was produced in a subject as part of an M.Sc. program; one thesis; two papers elaborated by undergraduate nursing faculty and students; four were part of research projects funded by the Brazilian Scientific and Technological Development Council (CNPq), one of which was also taken from a thesis; one was developed with funding from the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP); three were written by Ph.D. graduates and clinical nurses; and 26 papers deriving from research by Ph.D. and M.Sc. graduates affiliated with academic institutions.

After detailing the investigation phase of the solutions, which prioritized the search for and verification of information relevant for and suitable to the research problem, the third phase started, called explanatory analysis of the solutions.8 Therefore, the information in the selected studies was analyzed, distinguishing between the data presented and any associated justifications.

Nevertheless, the origins, effects or goals of these data also need further explanation, which can be done empirically, based on common sense.8 Therefore, next, the data will be presented that were collected from the selected studies after complying with the specific orientations described for that phase.

RESULTS

Next, the different concepts are presented as defined by the authors of the selected publications under analysis, in accordance with the research problem. It should be highlighted that some authors use synonyms or other names for the selected terms and that few of them provide their own definitions, but instead use definitions elaborated by other authors to compose their theoretical-conceptual description.

This phase, called explanatory analysis of the solutions,8 is presented in Picture 1 , which addresses the themes listed under the research problem, as well as other names and synonyms the different authors have used.

In addition, some observations should be indicated which emerged from the conceptual analysis process, including the fact that, for some concepts, definitions were presented that are linked with specific situations, which were used by other health areas to refer to the aspects of their practice.

Hence, in collective health, conceptual framework was understood as the result of the theoretical-epistemological elaboration and the scientific production, articulated with social practices, and of criticism against the different health reform movements and projects that have taken place in capitalist countries.10

As regards the term "care model", some authors consider that care model is a synonym of the hegemonic medical model,31 of assistance model,32 or of assistential model.33 Others believe that assistential model can also be called care model;22 which is similar to the Nursing Care Systemization (NCS);27,34 or that distinctions exist among the concepts but that, "in the Brazilian reality, the official assistential model in health is usually referred to as 'care model' [...]".20:348

The definitions for the term care model were reduced, due to the fact that some texts used, elaborated, cited and even presented diagrams representing care models. The authors, however, did not present any definitions, so that the readers had to understand and interpret them.

In the analysis of the term "nursing process", although some authors consider the concept "NCS" as distinct,25,28,35 the majority considers these terms as synonyms.27,29-30,36-38 In addition, many other names were found, including,27,39 assistential method or care method,25,29,36,39 nursing care,16 organizational process,16 nursing care and intervention,39 caregiving or care process,29,36 care method,16,36 care planning, care process, nursing consultation and nursing care process.36

Finally, other important and frequently used concepts in nursing, like theoretical model and nursing theory, were also found after the textual analysis but, as they had not been selected in advance, they were not addressed.

DISCUSSION

To present the fourth and final phase8, called integrative synthesis, which involves reflection and the proposal of solutions, based on the research material, initially, we present some definitions for the model concept, based on the literature. This option is justified in the belief that this concept permeates many others the authors of the selected studies presented and, sometimes, is mixed up with the method concept, which also deserves a specific conceptual definition.

The word model is constituted by definitions of concepts40 and does not exist in the physical world, but exists in the abstract world and represents different forms of seeing nursing41 and refers to theoretical bases that underpin an activity area.42

In general, model can be understood as an abstraction of reality, that is, a way of visualizing it and facilitating reasoning.11 A model needs a structure of ideas and concepts, which can vary in their conceptions and in the way central nursing concepts are described. But model is not a theory, predicting care outcomes. Instead, it is a structure of ideas that guides care practice and should reflect this practice. Thus, "nursing models should be understood as guiding structures or a philosophy that sustains nursing care, that is, they should offer principles that helps the nurse to guide care in all of its phases, according to the complexity level of the care".41:79

The term method, then, refers to the way care is accomplished, applied, delivered to the client/family under the professional's responsibility. Some authors cite that the nursing process is a form of method, as it directs the application of care based on established guidelines.11,16,25-29,35-36,37,39

To propose solutions, as the adopted method requests, and contribute to advances in the construction of nursing knowledge, next, we present a proposal that joins the definitions presented by the different authors of the Brazilian studies selected for the study concepts.

Contributions to the advancement in the definitions

In view of these considerations, figure 1 displays a mental construction, elaborated based on the definitions found for each of the terms focused on in this research.


As described, these definitions were based on the authors included in the references selected for this study, and some points should be highlighted.

The term "Care method" refers to the way care should be accomplished, a route to follow to accomplish care, which should be sustained by the reference framework used. When citing this concept, however, many authors used it as a synonym of nursing process, which explains the similarity between the two concepts' definitions.

The term "Assistance model" was characterized by the definition based on different views. Besides the view presented for nursing, the definition in public health is cited; set of organized actions, based on political, social, economic and cultural strategies, articulated with physical, technological and human resources aimed at intervening in the health-disease process of a population.

In the researchers' understanding, the concept attributed to the term Care model was limited, and did not address all of its dimensions. Therefore, it did not receive the necessary and fair importance it represents for the profession. Thus, we defend the concept that a care model is a theoretical set of the four central concepts in nursing: nursing, health-disease, society/environment, human beings, besides others necessary, as well as premises based on a theoretical and philosophical framework that serves to guide nursing care through systemized actions. It is a theoretical structure that interrelates concepts, premises and a care method, represented by a diagram.4

Finally, the absence of the definition for the term "Reference framework" is justified, as all texts that methods this concept did not present an explicit description, so that its analysis, condensation and presentation was impossible.

FINAL CONSIDERATIONS

Constructing the knowledge in a discipline is a hard task, but which nevertheless needs to be accomplished constantly. Aspects previously addressed need to be taken into account, but advances are fundamental.

The use of nursing concepts remits to the importance of clarifying the knowledge itself developed in the area, and further elaborating the theoretical aspects is fundamental to guarantee greater visibility, acknowledgement of the discipline and the possibility of certified and qualified practical intervention.

The collection of the conceptual definitions in this research, based on the different views of the authors of the Brazilian publications involved, revealed that, besides similarities, particularities and divergences regarding the theme under analysis, inappropriate conceptual elements are relatively common. There is a lack of understanding in the use of some terms, which are mistakenly considered as synonyms in some situations and do not receive the depth and density to guarantee their range, individuality and subjectivity. Such inappropriate elements can further increase the conceptual confusion, a fact that hampers the understanding of theoretical aspects in nursing knowledge.

Hence, this research contributes as it permits visualizing conceptual differences and similarities in the Brazilian publications, and also presents a proposed conceptual definition deriving from the literature under analysis, provided for each term investigated and studied here.

This reveals the need to further elaborate concepts, establish meanings for practice, as knowledge construction involves operational as well as conceptual issues. Proposals need to be presented that define and analyze concepts, with a view to enhancing the knowledge base of Brazilian nursing, contributing to its advancement and consolidation.

REFERENCES

Received: May 27, 2011

Approved: July 05, 2012

  • 1. McEwen M. Filosofia, ciência e enfermagem. In: McEwen M, Wills EM. Bases teóricas para enfermagem. 2Ş ed. Porto Alegre (RS): Artmed; 2009. p.27-47.
  • 2. Meleis AI. Theoretical nursing: development and progress. 4th ed. Philadelphia (US): J. B. Lippincott Company; 2007.
  • 3. Rocha PK. Construção e validação de um instrumento para avaliação de modelos de cuidado de enfermagem [tese na Internet]. Florianópolis (SC): Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem; 2008 [acesso 2010 Set 07]. Disponível em: http://www.tede.ufsc.br/teses/PNFR0620-T.pdf
  • 4. Wall ML. Características da proposta de cuidado de enfermagem de Carraro a partir da avaliação de teorias de Meleis [tese]. Florianópolis (SC): Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem; 2008.
  • 5. Meleis AI. Theoretical nursing: development and progress. 3rd ed. Philadelphia (US): J.B. Lippincott Company; 1997.
  • 6. Meleis AI. Pflegetheorien: gegenstand, entwiklung und perspektiven des theoretischen denkens in der pflege. 3 ed. Bern (CH): Hans Huber Verlag; 1999.
  • 7. Silva AL, Arruda EM. Referenciais com base em diferentes paradigmas: problema ou solução para a prática de enfermagem? Texto Contexto Enferm. 1993 Jan-Jun; 2(1):82-92.
  • 8. Salvador AD. Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa bibliográfica: elaboração de trabalhos científicos. 11Ş ed. Porto Alegre (RS): Sulina; 1986.
  • 9. Lima TCS, Mioto RCT. Procedimentos metodológicos na construção do conhecimento científico: a pesquisa bibliográfica. Rev Katál. 2007;10(esp):37-45.
  • 10. Paim JS, Filho NA. Saúde coletiva: uma "nova saúde pública" ou campo aberto a novos paradigmas? Rev Saúde Pública. 1998 Jun; 32(4):299-316.
  • 11. Neves RS. Sistematização da assistência de enfermagem em unidade de reabilitação segundo o modelo conceitual de Horta. Rev Bras Enferm. 2006 Jul-Ago; 59(4):556-9.
  • 12. Ivo ML, Carvalho EC. Assistência de enfermagem a portadores de anemia falciforme à luz do referencial de Roy. Rev Latino-am Enfermagem [online]. 2003 Mar-Abr [acesso 2010 Dez 10]; 11(2). Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rlae/v11n2/v11n2a08.pdf
  • 13. Lima S, Carvalho ML, Vasconcelos AGG. Proposta de modelo hierarquizado aplicado à investigação de fatores de risco de óbito infantil neonatal. Cad Saúde Pública [online]. 2008 Ago [acesso 2010 Out 15]; 24(8). Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/csp/v24n8/19.pdf
  • 14. Lima S. Proposta de modelo hierarquizado aplicado à investigação de fatores de risco para o óbito infantil neonatal no Estado do Rio de Janeiro [dissertação]. Rio de Janeiro (RJ): Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca; 2006.
  • 15. Graças EM, Santos GF. Metodologia do cuidar em enfermagem na abordagem fenomenológica. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2009;43(1):200-7.
  • 16. Nascimento KC, Backes DS, Koerich MS, Erdmann AL. Sistematização da assistência de enfermagem: vislumbrando um cuidado interativo, complementar e multiprofissional. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2008 Dez; 42(4):643-8.
  • 17. Malta DC, Cecílio LCO, Merhy EE, Franco TB, Jorge AO, Costa MA. Perspectivas da regulação na saúde suplementar diante dos modelos assistenciais. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva [online]. 2004 Abr-Jun [acesso 2010 Nov 07]; 9(2). Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/csc/v9n2/20397.pdf
  • 18. Malta DC, Jorge AO. Modelos assistenciais na saúde suplementar: o caso de uma operadora de autogestão. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva [online]. 2008 Set-Out [acesso 2010 Nov 07]; 13(5). Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/csc/v13n5/18.pdf
  • 19. Shimizu HE, Rosales C. As práticas desenvolvidas no Programa Saúde da Família contribuem para transformar o modelo de atenção à saúde? Rev Bras Enferm. 2009 Maio-Jun; 62(3):424-9.
  • 20. Oliveira MC. Os modelos de cuidados como eixo de estruturação de atividades interdisciplinares e multiprofissionais em saúde. Rev Bras Educ Médica [online]. 2008 Jul-Set [acesso 2010 Dez 06]; 32(3). Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbem/v32n3/v32n3a09.pdf
  • 21. Lucena AF, Paskulin LMG, Souza MF, Gutiérrez MGR. Construção do conhecimento e do fazer enfermagem e os modelos assistenciais. Rev Esc Enferm USP [online]. 2006 Jun [acesso 2010 Nov 07]; 40(2). Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/reeusp/v40n2/19.pdf
  • 22. Leite JL, Erdmann AL, Carvalho SM; Pezzi MCS, Dantas CC. O caminhar para a concepção de um modelo de cuidado ao cliente hiv positivo. Cienc Cuid Saude. 2007 Abr-Jun; 6(2):187-96.
  • 23. Teixeira MA, Nitschke RG. Modelo de cuidar em enfermagem junto às mulheres-avós e sua família no cotidiano do processo de amamentação. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2008 Jan-Mar; 17(1):183-91.
  • 24. Waldow VR, Borges RF. O processo de cuidar sob a perspectiva da vulnerabilidade. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem [online]. 2008 Ago [acesso 2010 Out 15]; 16(4). Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rlae/v16n4/pt_18.pdf
  • 25. Dell'Acqua MCQ, Miyadahira AMK. Processo de enfermagem: fatores que dificultam e os que facilitam o ensino. Rev Esc Enferm USP [online]. 2000 Dez [acesso 2010 Dez 10]; 34(4). Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342000000400010&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=pt
  • 26. Cogo AL, Pedro E, Almeida M. Teaching of the nursing process in Brazil: literature review from 1996 to 2006. Online Braz J of Nurs [online]. 2006 [acesso 2010 Set 10]; 15(3). Disponível em: http://www.objnursing.uff.br/index.php/nursing/article/view/542/122
  • 27. Garcia TR, Nóbrega MML. Processo de enfermagem: da teoria à prática assistencial e de pesquisa. Esc Anna Nery Rev Enferm [online]. 2009 Jan-Mar [acesso 2010 Nov 07]; 13(1). Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/ean/v13n1/v13n1a26.pdf
  • 28. Carvalho EC, Bachion MM. Processo de enfermagem e sistematização da assistência de enfermagem: intenção de uso por profissionais de enfermagem. Rev Eletr Enferm [online]. 2009 Set [acesso 2010 Set 12];11(3). Disponível em : http://www.fen.ufg.br/revista/v11/n3/v11n3a01.htm
  • 29. Alves AR, Lopes CHAF, Jorge MSB. Significado do processo de enfermagem para enfermeiros de uma unidade de terapia intensiva: uma abordagem interacionista. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2008 Dez; 42(4):649-55.
  • 30. Carvalho EC, Kusumota L. Processo de enfermagem: resultados e consequências da utilização para a prática de enfermagem. Acta Paul Enferm. 2009; 22(Esp):554-7.
  • 31. Silva KL, Sena RR, Seixas CT, Feuerwerker LCM, Merhy EE. Atenção domiciliar como mudança do modelo tecnoassistencial. Rev Saúde Pública. 2010 Fev; 44(1):166-76.
  • 32. Scatena JHG, Tanaka OY. A descentralização da saúde no Estado de Mato Grosso, Brasil: financiamento e modelo de atenção. Rev Panam Salud Publica [online]. 2000 Out [acesso 2010 Dez 12]; 8(4). Disponível em: http://www.scielosp.org/pdf/rpsp/v8n4/3550.pdf
  • 33. Silva KL, Sena R, Leite JCA, Seixas CT, Golçalves AM. Internação domiciliar no Sistema Único de Saúde. Rev Saúde Pública [online]. 2005 Jun [acesso 2010 Dez 12]; 39(3). Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rsp/v39n3/24792.pdf
  • 34. Lima AFC, Kurcgant P. O processo de implementação do diagnóstico de enfermagem no Hospital Universitário da Universidade de São Paulo. Rev Esc Enferm USP [online]. 2006 Mar [acesso 2010 Nov 7]; 40(1). Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/reeusp/v40n1/a15v40n1.pdf
  • 35. Dell'Acqua MCQ, Miyadahira AMK. Ensino do processo de enfermagem nas escolas de graduação em enfermagem do estado de São Paulo. Rev Latino-am Enfermagem [online]. 2002 Mar-Abr [acesso 2010 Out 15]; 10(2). Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rlae/v10n2/10513.pdf
  • 36. Ramos LAR, Carvalho EC, Canini SRMS. Opinião de auxiliares e técnicos de enfermagem sobre a sistematização da assistência de enfermagem. Rev Eletr Enferm [online]. 2009 [acesso 2010 Set 10]; 11(1). Disponível em: http://www.fen.ufg.br/revista/v11/n1/v11n1a05.htm
  • 37. Cunha SMB, Barros ALBL. Análise da implementação da Sistematização da assistência de enfermagem, segundo o modelo conceitual de Horta. Rev Bras Enferm. 2005 Set-Out; 58(5):568-72.
  • 38. Salomão GSM, Azevedo RCS. Produção bibliográfica sobre o processo de enfermagem. Acta Paul Enferm. 2009 Set-Out; 22(5):691-5.
  • 39. Garcia TR, Nóbrega MML, Carvalho EC. Nursing process: application to the professional practice. Online Braz J Nurs [online]. 2004 Ago [acesso 2010 Set 10]; 3(2). Disponível em: www.uff.br/nepae/objn302garciaetal.htm
  • 40. Pereira MJB, Mishima SM, Fortuna CM, Matumoto S. A assistência domiciliar: conformando o modelo assistencial e compondo diferentes interesses/necessidades do setor saúde. Rev Latino-am Enfermagem [online]. 2005 Nov-Dez [acesso 2010 Nov 10]; 13(6). Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rlae/v13n6/v13n6a13.pdf
  • 41. Nóbrega MML, Barros ALBL. Modelos assistenciais para a prática de enfermagem. Rev Bras Enferm. 2001 Jan-Mar; 54(1):74-80.
  • 42. Püschel VAA, Ide CAC, Chaves EC. Modelos clínicos e psicossocial de atenção ao indivíduo e à família na assistência domiciliar: bases conceituais. Rev Esc Enferm USP [online]. 2006 Jun [acesso 2010 Nov 07]; 40(2). Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/reeusp/v40n2/14.pdf
  • Correspondence:

    Luciane Favero
    Rua Urbano Lopes, 214 ap. 1901 A - Cristo Rei
    80050-520, Curitiba, PR, Brasil
    E-mail:
  • Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      24 June 2013
    • Date of issue
      June 2013

    History

    • Received
      27 May 2011
    • Accepted
      05 July 2012
    Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Programa de Pós Graduação em Enfermagem Campus Universitário Trindade, 88040-970 Florianópolis - Santa Catarina - Brasil, Tel.: (55 48) 3721-4915 / (55 48) 3721-9043 - Florianópolis - SC - Brazil
    E-mail: textoecontexto@contato.ufsc.br