Na origem está o signo

Silveira, Lauro Frederico Barbosa da

doi:10.1590/S0101-31731991000100002

Resumos

A lógica como semiótica implica, do ponto de vista de Peirce, uma estrutura triádica onde a bipolaridade constituída pelo par sujeito-objeto é superada. Tanto o nominalismo quanto o individualismo são ultrapassados. O signo é mais amplo do que o símbolo e supõe a potencialidade e a atualidade. Duas classes de objetos e duas séries de interpretantes, cada uma destas últimas admitindo três espécies, dão lugar a uma lógica da conduta científica que faz apelo a uma comunidade futura cuja crença corresponde à Verdade, e a uma dimensão cosmológica do pensamento que fundamenta a derradeira objetividade do conhecimento e da volição.

Semiótica; objeto; interpretante; comunidade; pensamento

Logic as semiotics implies, in the Peirce's point of view, a triadic structure of thought and sign, where the bipolarity constituted by the pair subject - object is overcome. Nominalism is surpassed and individualism too. Sign is broader than symbol and supposes potentiality and actuallity. Two classes of objects and two series of interprétants, each one of the least by its turn admitting a triple subdivision, give place to a logic of scientific conduct. This makes appeal to a future community whose belief corresponds to the Truth, and to a cosmologie dimension of thought that supplies with a ground to the last objectivity of knowledge and volition.

Semiotics; object; interprétant; community; thought

ARTIGOS ORIGINAIS

Na origem está o signo

In the origin is the sign

Lauro Frederico Barbosa da Silveira

Departamento de Filosofia da Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências - UNESP - 17500 - SP

RESUMO

A lógica como semiótica implica, do ponto de vista de Peirce, uma estrutura triádica onde a bipolaridade constituída pelo par sujeito-objeto é superada. Tanto o nominalismo quanto o individualismo são ultrapassados. O signo é mais amplo do que o símbolo e supõe a potencialidade e a atualidade. Duas classes de objetos e duas séries de interpretantes, cada uma destas últimas admitindo três espécies, dão lugar a uma lógica da conduta científica que faz apelo a uma comunidade futura cuja crença corresponde à Verdade, e a uma dimensão cosmológica do pensamento que fundamenta a derradeira objetividade do conhecimento e da volição.

Unitermos: Semiótica; objeto; interpretante; comunidade; pensamento.

ABSTRACT

Logic as semiotics implies, in the Peirce's point of view, a triadic structure of thought and sign, where the bipolarity constituted by the pair subject - object is overcome. Nominalism is surpassed and individualism too. Sign is broader than symbol and supposes potentiality and actuallity. Two classes of objects and two series of interprétants, each one of the least by its turn admitting a triple subdivision, give place to a logic of scientific conduct. This makes appeal to a future community whose belief corresponds to the Truth, and to a cosmologie dimension of thought that supplies with a ground to the last objectivity of knowledge and volition.

Keywords: Semiotics; object; interprétant; community; thought.

Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.

Full text available only in PDF format.

REFERÊNCIAS BIBLIOGRÁFICAS

1. APEL, K. O. Charles Sanders Peirce and the post-tarskian problem of an adequate explication of the meaning of truth: towards a transcendental theory. Part I. The Monist, La Salle, v. 63, p. 386-407, 1980. Part II. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. Buffalo, v. 18, n. 1, p. 3-17, 1982.

2. APEL, K. O. Charles S. Peirce: from pragmatism to pragmaticism. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1981.

3. APEL, K. O. La transformación de la filosofia. Madrid: Taurus, 1985, v. 1 e 2.

4. BENSE, M. Pequena estética. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 1971.

5. GREENLEE, D. Peirce's concept of sign. The Hague: Mouton, 1973.

6. HABERMAS, J. Knowledge and human interests. London: Heinemann, 1972.

7. MORRIS, C Writings on the general theory of signs. The Hague: Mouton, 1971.

8. NESHER, D. Are there grounds for identifying "Ground" with "Interpretant" in Peirce's pragmatic theory of meaning? Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, Buffalo, v. 20, n. 3, p. 303-324,1984.

9. PEIRCE, C. S. Collected papers of Charles S. Peirce. Edited by Hartshorne, Weiss and Burks. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1958,1974. v. 1-8.

10. PEIRCE, C. S. The new elements of mathematics. Edited by Carolyn Eisele. The Hague: Mouton, 1976. v. 1-4.

11. PEIRCE, C. S., WELBY, V. L. Semiotics and signifies: the correspondence between Charles S. Peirce and Victoria Lady Weeby. Edited by Charles S. Hardwick. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1977.

12. ROSENTHAL, S. B. Peirce Peircés ultimate logical interprétant and dynamical object: a pragmatic perspective. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, Buffalo, v. 26, n.2, p. 195-210,1990.

13. SAVAN, D. Questions concerning certain classifications claimed for signs. Semiotica, The Hague, v. 19, n. 3/4, p. 179-196, 1977.

14. SAVAN, D. Response to T. A. Short. Transactions ot the Charles S. Peirce Society, Buffalo, v. 22, n. 2, p. 125-144, 1986.

15. SHORT, T. A. David Savan's Peirce studies. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, Buffalo, v. 22, n, 2, p. 89-124,1986.

16. SHORT, T. A. Life among legisigns. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, Buffalo, v. 18, n. 4, p. 285-310, 1982.

17. SHORT, T. A. Peirce's conception of final causation. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirces Society, Buffalo, v. 17, n. 4, p. 369-382,1981.

18. SHORT, T. A. Semeiosis and intentionality. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, Buffalo, v. 17, n. 3, p. 197-223,1981.

19. SHORT, T. A. Some problems concerning Peirce's conceptions of concepts and propositions. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, Buffalo, v. 20, n. 1, p. 20-37,1984. 984.

1. APEL, K. O. Charles Sanders Peirce and the post-tarskian problem of an adequate explication of the meaning of truth: towards a transcendental theory. Part I. The Monist, La Salle, v. 63, p. 386-407, 1980.
Part II. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. Buffalo, v. 18, n. 1, p. 3-17, 1982.
2. APEL, K. O. Charles S. Peirce: from pragmatism to pragmaticism. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1981.
3. APEL, K. O. La transformación de la filosofia. Madrid: Taurus, 1985, v. 1 e 2.
4. BENSE, M. Pequena estética. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 1971.
5. GREENLEE, D. Peirce's concept of sign. The Hague: Mouton, 1973.
6. HABERMAS, J. Knowledge and human interests. London: Heinemann, 1972.
7. MORRIS, C Writings on the general theory of signs. The Hague: Mouton, 1971.
8. NESHER, D. Are there grounds for identifying "Ground" with "Interpretant" in Peirce's pragmatic theory of meaning? Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, Buffalo, v. 20, n. 3, p. 303-324,1984.
9. PEIRCE, C. S. Collected papers of Charles S. Peirce. Edited by Hartshorne, Weiss and Burks. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1958,1974. v. 1-8.
10. PEIRCE, C. S. The new elements of mathematics. Edited by Carolyn Eisele. The Hague: Mouton, 1976. v. 1-4.
11. PEIRCE, C. S., WELBY, V. L. Semiotics and signifies: the correspondence between Charles S. Peirce and Victoria Lady Weeby. Edited by Charles S. Hardwick. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1977.
12. ROSENTHAL, S. B. Peirce Peircés ultimate logical interprétant and dynamical object: a pragmatic perspective. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, Buffalo, v. 26, n.2, p. 195-210,1990.
13. SAVAN, D. Questions concerning certain classifications claimed for signs. Semiotica, The Hague, v. 19, n. 3/4, p. 179-196, 1977.
14. SAVAN, D. Response to T. A. Short. Transactions ot the Charles S. Peirce Society, Buffalo, v. 22, n. 2, p. 125-144, 1986.
15. SHORT, T. A. David Savan's Peirce studies. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, Buffalo, v. 22, n, 2, p. 89-124,1986.
16. SHORT, T. A. Life among legisigns. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, Buffalo, v. 18, n. 4, p. 285-310, 1982.
17. SHORT, T. A. Peirce's conception of final causation. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirces Society, Buffalo, v. 17, n. 4, p. 369-382,1981.
18. SHORT, T. A. Semeiosis and intentionality. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, Buffalo, v. 17, n. 3, p. 197-223,1981.
19. SHORT, T. A. Some problems concerning Peirce's conceptions of concepts and propositions. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, Buffalo, v. 20, n. 1, p. 20-37,1984. 984.

Datas de Publicação

Publicação nesta coleção
29 Nov 2011
Data do Fascículo
Dez 1991

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

[1] 1. APEL, K. O. Charles Sanders Peirce and the post-tarskian problem of an adequate explication of the meaning of truth: towards a transcendental theory. Part I. The Monist, La Salle, v. 63, p. 386-407, 1980.

[2] Part II. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. Buffalo, v. 18, n. 1, p. 3-17, 1982.

[3] 2. APEL, K. O. Charles S. Peirce: from pragmatism to pragmaticism. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1981.

[4] 3. APEL, K. O. La transformación de la filosofia. Madrid: Taurus, 1985, v. 1 e 2.

[5] 4. BENSE, M. Pequena estética. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 1971.

[6] 5. GREENLEE, D. Peirce's concept of sign. The Hague: Mouton, 1973.

[7] 6. HABERMAS, J. Knowledge and human interests. London: Heinemann, 1972.

[8] 7. MORRIS, C Writings on the general theory of signs. The Hague: Mouton, 1971.

[9] 8. NESHER, D. Are there grounds for identifying "Ground" with "Interpretant" in Peirce's pragmatic theory of meaning? Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, Buffalo, v. 20, n. 3, p. 303-324,1984.

[10] 9. PEIRCE, C. S. Collected papers of Charles S. Peirce. Edited by Hartshorne, Weiss and Burks. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1958,1974. v. 1-8.

[11] 10. PEIRCE, C. S. The new elements of mathematics. Edited by Carolyn Eisele. The Hague: Mouton, 1976. v. 1-4.

[12] 11. PEIRCE, C. S., WELBY, V. L. Semiotics and signifies: the correspondence between Charles S. Peirce and Victoria Lady Weeby. Edited by Charles S. Hardwick. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1977.

[13] 12. ROSENTHAL, S. B. Peirce Peircés ultimate logical interprétant and dynamical object: a pragmatic perspective. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, Buffalo, v. 26, n.2, p. 195-210,1990.

[14] 13. SAVAN, D. Questions concerning certain classifications claimed for signs. Semiotica, The Hague, v. 19, n. 3/4, p. 179-196, 1977.

[15] 14. SAVAN, D. Response to T. A. Short. Transactions ot the Charles S. Peirce Society, Buffalo, v. 22, n. 2, p. 125-144, 1986.

[16] 15. SHORT, T. A. David Savan's Peirce studies. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, Buffalo, v. 22, n, 2, p. 89-124,1986.

[17] 16. SHORT, T. A. Life among legisigns. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, Buffalo, v. 18, n. 4, p. 285-310, 1982.

[18] 17. SHORT, T. A. Peirce's conception of final causation. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirces Society, Buffalo, v. 17, n. 4, p. 369-382,1981.

[19] 18. SHORT, T. A. Semeiosis and intentionality. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, Buffalo, v. 17, n. 3, p. 197-223,1981.

[20] 19. SHORT, T. A. Some problems concerning Peirce's conceptions of concepts and propositions. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, Buffalo, v. 20, n. 1, p. 20-37,1984. 984.

Brasil

Brasil

Na origem está o signo

In the origin is the sign

Resumos

Datas de Publicação