The Neostratotype of Itapecuru Formation (Lower-Middle Albian) and Its Impact for Mesozoic Stratigraphy of Parnaíba Basin

: This study defines the neostratotype of the Lower-Middle Albian Itapecuru Formation in the Parnaíba Basin, Northeast Brazil. In this sedimentary succession along the right bank of the Itapecuru river near the Itapecuru-Mirim City, Maranhão State, three lithofacies associations are recognized. the first is silty claystone with some very fine sand, micaceous, reddish color, thin laminated, showing a tabular aspect, interpreted as floodplain fines in a distal position. The second is clayey siltstone, reddish color, with ripple cross-lamination, very thin cross-laminated wacke lenses, grading to thin parallel lamination, in apparently tabular layers, interpreted as crevasse splay and distributive channels deposits in successive avulsion events. The third is fine quartz wacke, reddish to grayish color, showing grouped trough cross bedding, interpreted as channel filling deposits. These facies associations correspond to part of a fluvial depositional system, with predominantly fine-grained rocks, and small lakes in the floodplain, in an oxidizing environment and marked by seasonality. These field data, reinforced by grain size and petrographic analyses showed that, contrary to previous descriptions, the Itapecuru Formation consists mainly of mudrocks. this research also shows that the medium to coarse sandstones and conglomerates, previously included in the Itapecuru Formation, belong to the underlying Grajaú Formation.


INTRODUCTION
the Itapecuru Formation, as first proposed by Campbell (1949) in Maranhão or Parnaíba Basin, is predominantly constituted of sandstones (e.g. Mesner and Wooldridge 1962, 1964, Góes and Feijó 1994, Klein and Sousa 2012. It is the most widely outcropping Cretaceous unit and presents the largest outcropping surface of this intracontinental Paleo Mesozoic basin. the type locality is within the city of Itapecuru-Mirim (Campbell 1949), and the type section was informally established on the right bank of the Itapecuru river by Ferreira et al. (1992), under the Br-222 road bridge, which gives access to the town of Itapecuru-Mirim (Carvalho 1994). Nevertheless, Batista et al. (1984), in the Brazilian Stratigraphic Lexicon defined the type locality on the eastern coast of Pará State and the western coast of the Maranhão State. however, recent detailed geological mapping in rosário County, in the north of Maranhão State (F.J. Corrêa-Martins, unpublished data), revealed that the outcrops of Itapecuru Formation correspond mainly to claystones and siltstones. These findings motivated the reexamination of the informal type section, located about 60 km south of rosário city. In addition, due to constructions performed between 2012 and 2014 on the aforementioned bridge after heavy rains in 2009 (Departamento Nacional de Infraestrutura de transportes -DNIt, unpublished data), the type section has been destroyed. therefore, the objective of this paper is to formalize the neostratotype of the Itapecuru Formation (according to hedberg 1976, Petri et al. 1986, Murphy andSalvador 1999).

MATERIALS AND METHODS
The results of this study came from a detailed field description and interpretation of the stratigraphic section, exposed on the right bank of Itapecuru river, done in the dry season, in October, 2015. rock samples were collected for granulometric and petrographic analyses, and analysis of sedimentary textures (Picard 1971, Lundegard and Samuels 1980, Miall 1996, Boggs 2009, Lazar et al. 2015 and hues (Munsell 2009), to establish lithofacies (Picard 1971, Lundegard and Samuels 1980, Miall 1996, Boggs 2009, Lazar et al. 2015. these steps were necessary because most of the rocks samples are very fine-grained, which makes direct evaluations inaccurate (Pettijohn et al. 1972, Boggs 1995, 2006, Miall 2016. the thin sections were examined in a Zeiss Axio Imager A.1 petrographic microscope, of Sedimentary Geology Laboratory (LAGESED), Department of Geology, Institute of Geoscience of the Federal University of rio de Janeiro (UFrJ). the textural analyses were carried out in the Sedimentology Laboratory of Department of Geoscience, Institute of Agronomy, Federal rural University of rio de Janeiro (UFrrJ).
An architectural panel was designed from photographic mosaics of outcrops and the definition of two-dimensional geometry. the definition of lithofacies is based on the determination of the grain-size and the sedimentary structures, following the proposals of Miall (1978Miall ( , 1996. the facies are grouped into facies successions, or groups of lithofacies genetically related to each other, corresponding to sub-environment of a depositional system (Dalrymple 2010).
Samples for palynological and geochemical analyses were also collected, aiming to provide support to our interpretations.

GEOLOGICAL SETTING
the Parnaíba Basin, formerly known as Maranhão Basin, is an intraplate sag basin with asymmetric shape and area of ca. 600,000 km 2 (Campbell et al. 1949, Mesner and Wooldridge 1962, 1964, filled with sedimentary and magmatic rocks, with maximum estimated thickness of 3,500 m . the basin occupies large areas of the states of Maranhão (MA) and Piauí (PI), covering small portions of Ceará (CE), Bahia (BA), tocantins (tO) and Pará (PA) (Figure 1). Currently, its basin limits are constrained the Ferrer-Urbano Santos high (AFUS to the north), to the east by the Borborema Province, to the south by the São Francisco high (ASF), to the west by the tocantins Province and to the northwest by the tocantins or Capim high (AtC). recent seismic studies (Daly et al. 2014) suggest that its basement is compartmentalized, with the Amazon Craton and the Province of tocantins in the western part, the Parnaíba Block in the central west portion, as suggested by Brito  (Fortes 1978.
The essentially siliciclastic rocks that fill the Parnaíba Basin can be divided into cycles delimited by unconformities or super sequences, resulting from both sea level fluctuations and tectonics, in the context of formation and disintegration of Gondwana and Pangea supercontinents. The first super sequence is Silurian in age, represented by the Serra Grande Group, which includes the Ipu, tianguá and Jaicós formations. It is followed by the mid Devonian-Lower Carboniferous Canindé Group (Itaim, Pimenteiras, Cabeças, Longá and Poti formations), Lower Carboniferous-Lower triassic Balsas Group (Piauí, Pedra de Fogo, Motuca and Sambaíba formations), Jurassic Pastos Bons Formation, and the Cretaceous units defined as the Corda, Grajaú, Codó and Itapecuru formations (Góes and Feijó 1994, Linol et al. 2016. the basic igneous rocks occur mostly as intrusions within the layers, while extrusions are restricted. the ages of basic magmatism ranges between 215 and 87 Ma, grouped into two formations: the Lower Jurassic Mosquito Formation in the center-west, and the Cretaceous Sardinha Formation in the center-east and northeast (Góes and Feijó 1994, Linol et al. 2016) (Figure 1).
In recent years there have been proposals for subdivisions of the Parnaíba Basin infilling, separating the Mesozoic section into other basins, as Grajaú, Alpercatas and Espigão-Mestre basins (Góes and Coimbra 1996) or São Luís-Grajaú , but their acceptance has been restricted (Klein and Sousa 2012).

ITAPECURU FORMATION: HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
In the 1940s, the National Petroleum Council started the geological mapping of the Parnaíba Basin, also known as the Maranhão Basin. After fieldwork carried out in the southern and central portions of the basin, Campbell et al. (1948Campbell et al. ( , 1949 proposed the Serra Negra Formation, of tertiary age, for layers of sedimentary rocks located between the Codó and Barreiras formations, based on the outcropping rocks in Serra Negra, the type locality, near Formosa de Serra Negra city (FSN), about 80 km south of the city of Grajaú (G), MA (Campbell et al. 1948, Baptista et al. 1984 (Figure 1). this new formation was divided into two members: Sopé (lower), composed of soft red and gray shales, with some sandstone lenses and few carbonate, and Serra, consisting predominantly of fine quartzose sandstone with cross stratification and silt reddish brown to pink, with a few thin layers of reddish shale, and occasional occurrence of coarser sand and pebbles deposited in a continental environment , Figure 2a).
Posteriorly, the discovery of dinosaurs fossils in Livramento Island, São Marcos Bay, (Price 1947) and the recognition of predominance of very finegrained rocks that extend to the coast of Maranhão, led Campbell (1949) to reconsider the Serra Negra rocks as a member of a new unit, the Itapecuru Formation, whose name derives from the outcrops found near city of Itapecuru-Mirim, MA (IM) (Figure 1), which characterize practically all the rocks found in the unit. Campbell (1949) divided the Itapecuru Formation, of Cretaceous age, which includes all strata above the Codó Formation and below the Pirabas Formation, in three members, the former Serra Negra Formation, Undifferentiated and Boa Vista. therefore, Carvalho and Campos (1988) committed a mistake when they said that the division had resulted in two members.
t h e i n t e r m e d i a t e m e m b e r, c a l l e d "Undifferentiated", constituted of shale and interbedded sandstone, siltstone, silty shale, shale and claystone. the strata are predominantly micaceous and principal colors are dusky to moderate red with some greenish gray beds and mottling and occur in the central and northern part of the basin. Only near Alcântara city (A), to the northwest of São Luís Island (SL), some limestone beds occur (Figure 1). Campbell (1949) established the type locality this member is the banks of Itapecuru river near of Itapecuru-Mirim city (IM) (Figures 1, 2a). the upper member, "Boa Vista", consists of siltstone, fine-grained sandstone and silty shale, usually massive, and the predominant colors are red, gray and brown, with light shades. the name and type locality of this member comes from the Serra da Boa Vista, 10 km NE of Curator city, MA, now President Dutra (PD) (Figures 1, 2a). Campbell (1949) considered that most of the Itapecuru Formation represents a continental paleoenvironment, and only in the north of the basin, in the region of Alcântara, the presence of limestone layers and invertebrate fossils suggest a marine paleoenvironment. this conclusion was reached after these data were synthesized without indicating the type localities (Campbell 1950).
Later Mesner and Wooldridge (1962) made a revaluation study of the Parnaíba Basin for Petróleo Brasileiro S.A (Petrobras), based on previous studies, deep wells and seismic surveys they proposed the marginal basins of São Luís and Barreirinhas, which extend approximately parallel with the present coastline of Maranhão State, thus dividing the northern portion of the Parnaíba Basin ( Figure 1). however, when the data were published (Campos 1964, Mesner andWooldridge 1964), the characterization of the Itapecuru Formation was simplified, bringing together the three members in an undivided formation (Figure 2a), constituted for a series of variegated sandstones, siltstones, and shales, with usually reddish and greenish colors. According to Wooldridge (1962, 1964), the Itapecuru Formation is predominantly nonmarine in Parnaíba Basin, with floodplain facies, as valley-flat and alluvial plain, gradually changing to deltaic facies in São Luís Basin (Figure 2b).
In a revision of the Parnaíba Basin, Aguiar (1969Aguiar ( , 1971 proposed new lithostratigraphic unites, notedly the Grajaú Formation, initially characterized as fine sandstone to conglomerate, white to yellowish color, with laminar cross stratification underlying Codó Formation. Aguiar (1969Aguiar ( , 1971) also proposed the Alcântara Formation, near the city of the same name, for São Luís Basin, proposed by Cunha (1968) in an internal report. this unit consists of greenish-reddish gray shales, silty, with limestone lenses, lithofacies described by Campbell (1949) in the same area when he proposed the Itapecuru Formation. Its rocks are exposed on the cliffs near the Alcântara city and have been correlated with the limestones that appear in some parts of the island of São Luís. however, Aguiar (1969Aguiar ( , 1971 incorrectly included the Alcântara Formation in the stratigraphic column of the Parnaíba Basin, because that unit only occurs in the São Luís Basin (Figure 2a, b).
In studies carried out for Petrobras in the centerwest portion of the Parnaíba Basin, Carneiro (1974) verified that the sandstones and conglomerates of the Grajaú Formation are interdigitated with the bituminous shales, limestone and anhydrite of the Codó Formation and, in this case, the conglomerates and sandstones of the Grajaú Formation become clayey and slightly limestone (Figure 2a). Lima and Leite (1978) in studies for Companhia de Pesquisa de Recursos Minerais (CPRM), verified that Grajaú rocks occurring both below and above Codó Formation, and its contacts are predominantly gradational, with some local unconformities ( Figure  2a). Moreover, verified that the rocks existing in the type localities proposed for the lower and upper members of the Itapecuru Formation by Campbell (1949), respectively Serra Negra [near Formosa de Serra Negra (FSN)] and Boa Vista [Presidente Dutra (PD)] ( Figure 1) pertain, in the first case, to Corda and Grajaú formations and, in the second case, to Grajaú and Codó formations. those authors agree to characterize the depositional environment of the Grajaú rocks as deltaic, agreeing with Carneiro (1974). Cerqueira and Marques (1985) considered that the sandstones of Grajaú Formation in São Luís Basin could eventually become more clayey, as Carneiro (1974) had already observed in the Parnaíba Basin.
In general, most studies has followed Wooldridge (1962, 1964), that characterized the Itapecuru Formation constituted of sandstones and mudrocks, deposited in a fluvial paleoenvironment (e.g. Aguiar 1969, Carneiro 1974, Aranha et al. 1988, Cunha and Del'Arco 1988, Santos and Mamede 1990, Góes and Feijó 1994, Gonçalves and Carvalho 1996. Lima and Leite (1978) also accompanied the lithological characterization, and considered that the Itapecuru Formation resulted from sedimentation in fluvial environment, with associated lakes and flood plains, in semi-arid climate due to the extensive oxidizing character of the rocks.
Posteriorly rossetti and truckenbrodt (1997), based on informal divisions made in Itapecuru Formation by Aranha et al. (1988Aranha et al. ( , 1990 in São Luís Basin (Figures 1, 2b), proposed the elevation to category of group with three formations, "Undifferentiated Unit", Alcântara and Cujupe formations (Figure 2b). the Itapecuru Group (sensu rossetti and truckenbrodt 1997), and Grajaú and Codó formations was separate from the Parnaíba Basin, to constitute the Grajaú Basin (Góes et al. 1999), later transformed into the São Luís-Grajaú Basin . rossetti (2001), based in regional unconformities interpreted in gamma-ray and seismic data, divided the rocks of the São Luís-Grajaú Basin into three depositional sequences (S1, S2 and S3), establishing a correlation with the stratigraphic column proposed by rossetti and truckenbrodt (1997) (Figure 2b). Based on these proposals, in several studies carried out (e.g. Anaisse et al. 2001, rossetti et al. 2000, 2001, rossetti and Góes, 2003, Miranda and rossetti 2006, Mendes and Truckenbrodt 2009, the "Undifferentiated Unit" or S2 and part of S3 is described as consisting of fine and coarse sandstones, eventually conglomerates, possibly with matrix, limestones and mudrocks, and interpreted as fluvial-deltaic environment, flowing into a protected bay or gulf. In a review of the Parnaíba Basin for Petrobras, Vaz et al. (2007) adopted the depositional sequences proposed by Góes and Rossetti (2001) but, confusingly, show the interdigitated Itapecuru and Codó formations, reproducing the proposal of Góes and Feijó (1994), in erosive contact with the underlying Corda, Grajaú and Codó formations, for which they propose a relation of contemporaneity ( Figure 2a).

THE NEOSTRATOTYPE OF ITAPECURU FORMATION
According to hedberg (1976), Petri et al. (1986) and Murphy and Salvador (1999), the establishment of the neostratotype must meet the same requirements used for the formalization of the stratotype.
JUStIFICAtION AND NAME Campbell (1949) first proposed the name of Itapecuru Formation, widely distributed in the north central portion in Parnaíba Basin, being initially composed of three members named Serra Negra, Undifferentiated and Boa Vista, forming a lithological complex mapped both on the surface and in the subsurface. the name derives from the river where there are outcrops of the unit, next to city of Itapecuru-Mirim, MA. According to Wooldridge (1962, 1964) and Aranha et al.  (1988,1990), the formation also occurs in São Luís and Bragança-Viseu basins.
hIErArChY Campbell (1949) defined the unit as a formation. rossetti and truckenbrodt (1997) proposed the elevation of the Itapecuru Formation to the category of group in the São Luís Basin and later in the Grajaú-São Luís Basin, and some authors followed these propositions. It is recommend maintaining the unit as formation, because the hierarchical change was proposed for another basin and the detailed description of the distinctive characters of the "Undifferentiated Unit" of "Itapecuru Group" of rossetti and truckenbrodt (1997) was not made, in disagreement with the Brazilian Stratigraphic Nomenclature Code (Petri et al. 1986) and with the International Stratigraphic Guide (hedberg 1976, Murphy and Salvador 1999).
LOCALIZAtION Campbell (1949) defined the type locality in outcrops on the banks of the Itapecuru river, next to city of Itapecuru-Mirim, state of Maranhão (Figures  2b, 4a). the neostratotype is established in the right bank of the Itapecuru river, about 200 meters to the northeast of the river bridge (03º23'28,0" S, 44º21'35,9" W), accessed by an old ramp at the end of Senador Benedito Leite Street (Figures 3c, 4b).

Lithofacies, associations and interpretations
In this work, detailed observation of outcrops enabled the establishment of five lithofacies, and three lithofacies associations, as summarized in table I. the percentages reported below refer to the average observed.
Lithofacies Sil -Clayey Siltstone, reddish color (5r 4/6 -5r 6/6), with thin parallel lamination. It has an average thickness of 30 cm, and its appearance is tabular. the deposition of this facies was interpreted as by decantation of particles in subaquatic medium. It presents sporadic plastic deformation by load at the top. the thin parallel lamination allows an approximation with the lithofacies Fl of Miall (1996) and with the L2 of Gonçalves and Carvalho (1996), in which fluidized levels were also registered ( Figure 4c).
Lithofacies Sir -Clayey Siltstone, reddishcolored (5r 7/4 -10r 8/2) with ripple crosslamination (critically climbing-ripples). It has tabular appearance and an average thickness of 50 cm. this resulted from traction processes and settling of particles in a lower flow regime. The sedimentary structures were interpreted as to the lithofacies Sr of Miall (1996) and Sr-La3 of Simon and Gibling (2017) (Figure 4c).
Lithofacies Cl -Silty Claystone with some very fine sand, reddish color (5R 7/4 to 5R 6/6), micaceous, with lamination (2-8 mm) sometimes incipient, little mottled. Its thickness, from the water level of the Itapecuru river, is about 70 cm. the deposition of this facies was interpreted as predominantly resulted of suspended particles. this lithofacies is very similar in terms of grain size, sedimentary structures, thickness and geometry to the lithofacies Fl of Eberth and Miall (1991), L1 of Gonçalves and Carvalho (1996) and facies Fm r of Scherer et al. (2015), while the mottled aspect approaches the lithofacies Fr of Miall (1996) (Figure 4c).
The succession of five lithofacies described allowed the establishment of three groups or lithofacies associations.
Floodplain Fines Association -Constituted by lithofacies Cl, with lateral continuity for more than twenty meters. the rocks are homogeneous, with predominance of clay. there are no intraclasts or other evidences of traction flow ( Figure 5).
Interpretation -the layer geometry, extending tens of meters, allows interpreting the lithological set as representative of fine floodplain (FF element, Miall 1996), in a distal position. these characteristics are in accordance with low-energy cohesive floodplain (Nanson and Crooke 1992). Its reddish color indicates it was deposited in an oxidizing environment in semi-arid climate (Potter et al. 2005). the presence of small spots, with ellipsoidal shape of 2 to 3 mm of light green color, showing the reduction of Fe 3+ to Fe 2+ are interpreted as resulting from the activities of soft body invertebrates on the substrate, as Gonçalves and Carvalho (1996) had already recognized. the diagnostic horizons are incipient or absent, which allows classify as type entisol (retallack 1988). Previously, Gonçalves and Carvalho (1996) interpreted the association as predominantly lacustrine sedimentation.
Crevasse Splay Association -this association is constituted by lithofacies Sir, Wp and Sil, that occur in a succession of lithofacies and have lateral extension of several meters. the contact between the lithofacies Sir and Sil is gradational. the lithofacies Wp, which occurs at some levels within the range dominated by lithofacies Sir, presents erosive lower contact and the upper gradational superior (Figures 3c, 5).
Interpretation -this set of lithofacies is interpreted as constituent of crevasse splay (Miall 1996 element CS), resulting from crevasse lobes that prograde over the floodplain. The colors indicate sedimentation in an oxidizing paleoenvironment. Due to its sedimentary structures, the lithofacies Sil was deposited in a position more distant than the lithofacies Sir (Burns et al. 2017). In some points of the top of the lithofacies Sil convolute structures occur, indicating that it was not yet lithified. The lithofacies Wp, which occurs within the lithofacies Sir, is interpreted as distributive secondary and/or tertiary channels of crevasse channel, in successive events of avulsion (Smith et al. 1989, Stuart et al. 2014 (Figure 5). Previously Gonçalves and Carvalho (1996) interpreted the sedimentary structures of lithofacies L2, which correlate with lithofacies Sil, as the distal portion of river-mouth bars.
Channel Fill Association -this association is constituted by lithofacies Wt, in a bed of tabular appearance and estimated width of about twenty meters, with concave-erosive inferior contact with the lithofacies Sil of Crevasse Splay association. the sedimentary structures present low dipping and the paleocurrent indicators show small dispersion ( Figure 5).
Interpretation -Due to this data set, the association is here interpreted as channel filling deposits (element Ch, Miall 1996) whose color indicates that it was deposited in oxidizing paleoenvironment. the carbonate cementation that eventually occurs is the result of diagenetic events, which may be related to the weathering of plagioclase, or originate from preexisting units (Pettijohn et al. 1972), such as the Codó Formation. It should be noted that calcretes or CaCO 3 concretions are absent. Before, Gonçalves and Carvalho (1996) interpreted this lithofacies, which denominated L3, as deltaic front deposits or river mouth bars deposits in an aqueous body as a relatively calm and shallow lake.
PEtrOGrAPhIC ANALYSES the granulometric analyses confirmed the presence of silt and clay in all samples, at least 25% (lithofacies Wp and Wt) and a maximum of 98% (lithofacies Sil, Sir and Cl). the sand and silt grains show a little brightness, roundness from subangular to subrounded, and show elongate and equidimensional shapes (Figure 6a, b, c, d). There is no evidence of clay infiltration.
Because the friability and low cohesibility of the studied rocks, the diagenetic processes should have occurred at shallow depths. Due to these characteristics, the samples were impregnated to obtain thin sections. Under petrographic microscope, the mineral composition of the sand fraction is constituted essentially by monocrystalline quartz (91-93%), followed by plagioclase (6-8%) variably saussuritized, muscovite (1%), and opaque minerals (≤ 1%) (Figure 6a, b, d, f, g, h).
In the lithofacies Wp and Wt, the contacts between grains of sand are punctual and longitudinal (Figure 6a-d). In the other lithofacies, when sand grains are present, they are immersed in mudrock (Figure 6e-h). Sand grains and even silts may be involved in oxidation films. The calcite cementation appears only in the lithofacies Wp and Wt, sometimes in mosaic or poikilotopic form ( Figure  6d). the occurrence of carbonized phytoclasts in all the studied samples has to be underlined. they are fine with elongated to equidimensional forms (0.01-0.03 mm), being dispersed in the rocks ( Figure 6).   , d, f and h). the dashed yellow lines highlight some incipient bedding surfaces. Q, quartz; Pl, plagioclase; M, muscovite, Pk, poikilotopic cementation; Ph, phytoclast. Bar scale 0.2 mm.
Complementing this data, the X-ray diffraction (XrD) of the total rock in the fraction below 0.062 mm revealed the predominance of quartz, followed by montmorillonite, also occurring kaolinite and illite (F.J. Corrêa-Martins, unpublished data). these results are very similar to those reported for same area by Menezes and Carvalho (1996) and Sachs et al. (2017).

PALYNOLOGICAL AND GEOChEMICAL DAtA
Samples of rocks of the neostratotype did not show palynological content. however, in samples collected to the north in outcrops studied in rosário County correlated with neostratotype (F.J. Corrêa-Martins, unpublished data), green algae of the Pediastrum genus, which does not support salinity, were found, which indicate fresh-water conditions. the geochemical analyses carried out at ACME Lab, Canada, for the samples collected (F.J. Corrêa-Martins, unpublished data), revealed that the Boron, which allows to evaluate paleosalinity, presents average values between <1 and 1 ppm, indicating a freshwater paleoenvironment (Figure 4b).

LIMItS
In the proposed neostratotype, the waters of the Itapecuru river hide the lower limit of the stratigraphic unit. the upper limit is covered by vegetation and sediments. At regional scale, the contacts with the underlying formations Grajaú and Codó, of the Lower Cretaceous, are transitional, while the contact with the overlying the tertiary Barreiras Formation and the laterized soil cover are discordant (Carneiro 1974, Lima andLeite 1978). DIMENSIONS AND ShAPE the strata of the Itapecuru Formation are centimetric to metric, and the layers are mostly tabular, with very gentle dips, showing planar and low angle cross-bedding, besides planar structures and laminations, also occurring massive structures.
Determined through the Complicatisaccus cearensis and Elateropollenites jardinei pollen zone, the first of Late Aptian-Early Albian age, and the second of Middle Albian. GENESIS the rocks, sedimentary structures, fossils and palynomorphs found in the Itapecuru Formation support the interpretation of a fluvial depositional system, with predominantly fine deposits, with small lakes in floodplains, in an oxidizing environment and marked by seasonality.

COrrELAtION
According to the above biostratigraphic data, compared to other basins, the Itapecuru Formation is chronocorrelated with the Alter do Chão Formation of Solimões and Amazonas basins (Wanderley Filho et al. 2007, Cunha et al. 2007, and with the Araripina Formation of Araripe Basin (Assine 2007).

DISCUSSION
this new study of the Itapecuru Formation verified the predominance of very fine-grained lithofacies, and the studies of Ferreira et al. (1992), Carvalho (1994), Lovato et al. (1995), Gonçalves and Carvalho (1996) and F.J. Corrêa-Martins (unpublished data) support these results. Data from wells drilled in the north of the Parnaíba Basin near the city of Itapecuru-Mirim (Godoy andrezende 1975, Soares Filho 1998), shows consistently that rocks found in the Itapecuru Formation, with thickness ranging up to 220 m, are claystones and siltstones and, to a lesser extent, fine to very fine wackes. In wells drilled for Petrobras close to the same region, Mesner and Wooldridge (1962) and Lovato et al. (1995) also verified the predominance of mudrock in the Itapecuru Formation. In addition, it is emphasized that the water wells and the well PAF7-MA of Petrobras are located around 10 km from the proposed neostratotype (Figure 4b).
the fossiliferous content found in the Itapecuru Formation is compatible with the interpretation of a continental and freshwater paleoenvironment. In addition, the fossil of Candidodon itapecuruense (UFrJ-DG 113-r), a reptile with terrestrial life habit (Carvalho 1994, Nobre 2004, conserves part of the rock in which it was found in the destroyed type section, is correlated with the lithofacies Sil of the association of lithofacies CS described in this study. Other studies have shown that the concentration of chemical element Boron is related to the salinity of water during sedimentation. In research conducted for CPrM in the rocks of Parnaíba Basin, Lins (1978) found that of 74 samples collected from the Itapecuru Formation, 34 samples contained Boron, but the quantities were considered uniformly low, characterizing a continental nonsaline depositional paleoenvironment. Besides the samples collected in the neostratotype, other 50 samples from the Itapecuru Formation were collected in the Itapecuru-Mirim, Santa rita, Bacabeira and rosário counties for geochemical analyses (F.J. Corrêa-Martins, unpublished data). the Boron mean values found in these samples varying between <1 and 2 ppm, corroborating the interpretation of Lins (1978).
the apparent contradiction between the results obtained and the previous studies is result of several questions.
Campbell (1949) defined the Itapecuru Formation with three members (Figure 3a), the lower Serra Negra, essentially consisting of sandstones, sometimes conglomeratic, while the other two, Undifferentiated and Boa Vista, constituted predominantly by claystone and siltstone, with the presence of clayey sandstones (Campbell 1949), i.e., wackes (Gilbert 1954, Dott 1964, Pettijohn et al. 1972, Boggs 2009. the geological mapping carried out by Lima and Leite (1978) showed that the existing rocks in the type localities for the Serra Negra and Boa Vista members, located more than 200 km south of Itapecuru-Mirim city, belong to the oldest formations. As a result, the initial definition proposed by Campbell (1949Campbell ( , 1950, and simplified by Woodridge (1962, 1964) was no longer valid. the contact relationship between the Grajaú, Codó and Itapecuru formations is well known in outcrops, being characterized as predominantly gradational between the mentioned units, and the unconformities are of local character . therefore, the proposed discordances by rossetti (2001) and Vaz et al. (2007) for the Grajaú, Codó and Itapecuru formations based on gamma-ray and seismic data, occur within the formations, and need to be reevaluated.
this research retrieves the original characterizations proposed by Campbell (1949). together with the results of the field work, petrography and granulometry, the paleontological and geochemical data of the neostratotype and rosário, Bacabeira, Santa rita and Itapecuru-Mirim counties (F.J. Corrêa-Martins, unpublished data), shows that the Itapecuru Formation is mainly composed of silty claystones and clayey siltstones, while rocks such as fine wackes and others are subordinate. these very fine-grained rocks were deposited in a low energy subenvironment belonging to an anastomosed fluvial system, under paleo-oxidants conditions, as represented in the neostratotype presented here.
the advance of lithostratigraphy knowledge of the Parnaíba Basin (e.g. Aguiar 1969, Carneiro 1974, Lima and Leite 1978, allows to correlate the described lithologies of the former Serra Negra Member (Campbell 1949(Campbell , 1950 with the rocks of Grajaú Formation (Figure 3a). thus, the medium to coarse sandstones, and sometimes conglomerates, which have been described as belonging to the Itapecuru Formation by many authors, are in fact lithofacies of the Grajaú Formation.

CONCLUSIONS
the formalization of neostratotype of the Itapecuru Formation on the right bank of the Itapecuru river, near the city of Itapecuru-Mirim, allowed the characterization of this lithostratigraphic unit as predominantly mudrock, resulting from low-energy river system in warm semi-arid paleoclimatic conditions and with marked seasonality. these results modify the lithological characterization of the unit, which was previously considered predominantly psammitic.
this study demonstrated that the medium to coarse sandstones, and conglomerates previously included in the Itapecuru Formation belong to the Grajaú Formation. thus, it is suggested to carry out works aiming at a better characterization of this lithostratigraphic unit.
the changes proposed in this paper indicate the need to review the geological mapping of the Mesozoic section of the Parnaíba Basin.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
the author wishes to thank Petrobras for access to internal reports properly referred in this work. A debt of gratitude is likewise owed to Departamento Nacional de Infraestrutura de transportes (DNIt), Ministry of transport, for information about repairs carried out at Itapecuru river road bridge, and CPrM for access to reports of drilled water wells in the 1970s and 1990s. the author would like to thank Dr. Julio Cezar Mendes, Dr. Claudio Limeira Mello and Dr. renata da Silva Schmitt (UFrJ), and Dr. Sérgio Brandolise Citroni (UFrrJ) for their evaluation and comments. In the same way, would like also to thank the two anonymous reviewers and associate editor for their helpful reviews and insightful comments. through this research, the author would like to tribute the Museu Nacional do rio de Janeiro/UFrJ, for its bicentennial, the Course of Geology of UFrJ, for its diamond jubilee, and the Course of Geology of UFrrJ, for its gold jubilee.