Evaluation of injuries caused by anthropic action in snakes from Brazil

Human behavior toward wild animals is defined by cultural influences and often is affected by lack of knowledge, mainly in situations of confrontation. The present study was conducted between 2008 and 2013, involving analysis of snakes that had suffered injuries belonging to the reptile collections of Centro Universitário de Lavras and Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora. The injuries were classified according to location on the body. Among the 449 specimens analyzed, 245 specimens showed injury to some part of the body. The nonvenomous snakes were the most representative and had a higher rate of injury (66.3%) than the venomous ones (18.2%). The body region where the greatest percentage of injuries was recorded was the anterior (39.6%), followed by the middle (36.5%) and posterior (8.4%). We believe this fact may have resulted due the lack of knowledge on how to differentiate species. Studies of the relationship between schooling level and contact with environmental education activities demonstrate reduction of attacks on these animals. This fact indicates that the preservation of many species is related to awareness and education of the population.


Introduction
Snakes have always been objects of both great curiosity and fear among humans.Because human behavior toward animals is influenced by cultural perceptions and since there is often a lack of knowledge about animals and their behavior and role in the food chain and ecosystem, as well as about how to act during confrontations, certain species face indiscriminate extermination.In extreme cases this can lead species to a state of decline (Wilson, 1984;Pough et al., 2001;Barbosa et al., 2007;Baptista et al., 2008;França and Araújo, 2007).Although there is little evidence of the decline of snake populations, there are reports of the decline of other reptiles as common black snake Pseudechis porphyriacus (Shaw, 1794) (Elapidae), however, these population declines may be difficult to detect long-term studies being regarded as indispensable for understanding normal population trends and fluctuations (Gibbons et al., 2000).Although there is no consensus among herpetologists about this aspect in relation to snakes, some believe they are disappearing throughout the world (Mullin and Seigel, 2009).The reason for this lack of consensus is the dearth of studies about snake populations (Reading et al., 2010).
Extinction is a natural process, but more than 98% of extinctions nowadays occur due to human activities (Raup and Stanley, 1978).Of the over 10,119 reptile species in the world, it is believed that at least 167 are endangered (Primack and Rodrigues, 2001;Dixo and Verdade, 2006;Uetz and Hošek, 2014).In Brazil there are 760 reptile species (Costa and Bérnils, 2014), five of which are on the country's list of endangered species and six of which are on the endangered list of the state of Minas Gerais (Martins and Molina, 2008).
Currently 3,496snake species are known, belonging to 22 families (Uetz and Hošek, 2014), forming the second largest group of reptiles in the world by number of species.In Brazil, 386 species have been recorded (Costa and Bérnils, 2014), of which only 15% are considered venomous (Elapidae and Viperidae families).However, some genera of the Dipsadidae family (=Colubridae), considered nonvenomous, are capable of causing bites.In Brazil, approximately 85% of snakebites are caused by species of the Bothrops (sensu stricto), a genus of venomous snakes (Ribeiro and Jorge, 1997;Costa-Neto, 2000;Salomão et al., 2003;Ribeiro et al., 2008).
To most people, snakes are only viewed as potentially dangerous and their trophic interactions with other animals are ignored (Lima-Verde, 1994).As a result, in various regions of Brazil snakes are negatively stereotyped as always being "dangerous animals".This attitude and other aspects of popular culture heighten the chance for conflicts between humans and snakes (Cardoso et al., 2003;Argôlo, 2004), by influencing the way people interact with these animals (Vizotto, 2003;Silva, 2006).
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the physical state of snakes deposited in the reptile collections of the Centro Universitário de Lavras -Unilavras and Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora -UFJF, both located in the state of Minas Gerais and relate the data obtained in the literature on the subject.

Material and Methods
This study was conducted between February 2008 and June 2013, examining specimens of snakes coming from both urban and rural areas in different localities of the Brazil, reptiles belonging to the collections of the University Center of Lavras laboratories -Unilavras and the Federal University Juiz de Fora.This snakes were recorded at different times in both collections.Injuries resulting from human capture of specimens donated to the two collections were observed under a stereoscopic microscope Bel Photonics  .
The injuries were classified according to the location on the body: anterior portion (AP), from the head to the tenth ventral scale; middle portion (MP), from the tenth ventral scale to the cloacal plate; and posterior portion (PP), from the first scale after the cloaca until the end of the tail (PP).We decided to include the cephalic region in the anterior portion because in relation to the body size, the head is a too small a region to be considered separately.
All information obtained about the injuries observed in dead snakes collected were rescued from the fall collections of books where the specimens were analyzed.
The relation between the place of injury and category of snake (venomous and nonvenomous) was analyzed by the Chi-square test, using Microsoft Excel 2007, at a 5% level of significance.

Results
Among the 69 species and 449 specimens deposited and analyzed in the reptile collections of the two laboratories, 245 specimens of 52 species showed injury to one of the body portions (Table 1).
Table 1.Species of snake and number of specimens deposited and analyzed in the reptile collections of the Centro Universitário de Lavras -UNILAVRAS and Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora -UFJF, and position of the injury.

Species
Total number in the collections Of all the specimens analyzed in both collections, nonvenomous snakes were in the majority, comprised on 311 specimens (69.3%), while there were 110 venomous specimens (24.4%) and 28 specimens (6.3%) that could not be identified due to the severity of the injuries.However, the nonvenomous snakes had a higher percentage of injuries (66.3%, absolute number), probably causing their death, in comparison with venomous snakes (18.2%, absolute number) (Table 2).
The majority of the nonvenomous snake specimens analyzed suffered injuries to the anterior portion (44.9%), followed by the middle portion (43.9%) and posterior portion (11.2%).In turn, there were 44 specimens of venomous snakes with injuries, divided among the anterior portion (53.6%), middle portion (40.2%) and posterior portion (6.2%).The body region with the greatest percentage of injuries was the anterior portion (39.6%), followed by the middle (36.5%) and posterior portion (8.4%).
We did not find any statistical differences (Q=0.242;P= 2.835) when analyzing the dependence of the body part with the category (venomous and nonvenomous).

Discussion
The data demonstrate that the injury rate of the nonvenomous snakes is much greater than that of the venomous ones.We believe this can be due to various specific characteristics of some species, such as mimetism and aposematic coloration, considered to be defense mechanisms, beyond consequences caused by fear, myths and popular beliefs.
From earliest history, snakes are considered objects for man curious fascination, as causing both fear and veneration (Lima-Verde, 1994).Many legends and superstitions are present in the minds of many people, since this group is part of the mythology of various peoples too (Pizzatto, 2003).The snake is regarded as an animal of evil in Christian culture (Genesis), in which "the snake represents temptation, being the smartest animal which God had created" (Pizzatto, 2003).Thus many legends and superstitions were created and passed from generation to generation, being counted and snakes seen as a threat or something bad that they can bring to people (see Bernarde, 2012).Another issue would be the lack of basic knowledge, since the practice of environmental education essential for conservation of this group would be (Bernarde, 2012).For example, snakes of the Elapidae family are morphologically very similar to species of the Oxyrophus genus (Dipsadidae family) (Sazima and Haddad, 1992;Marques et al., 2001).Therefore, peoples' inability to differentiate snakes leads to indiscriminate killing because of a belief they are dangerous, whether or not this is really the case.In general, the serpent that appears in various cultures both representing good and evil, is a symbol of strength and power, representing the mystery, the immortal, the unconscious.
According to Moura et al. (2010), in a study conducted in the state of Minas Gerais, 50% of respondents in a survey said they did not know to differentiate between poisonous and non-poisonous snakes.This paper also reports that people who took part in the study had a tendency to kill any snake species because they felt threatened.Another  Moura et al. (2010) analyzed two distinct populations.In one, 46% of respondents demonstrated a high level of hostility toward snakes, reporting that they were going to kill a snake if the opportunity arises, whereas in another population, less hostile, only 5% said that.The authors attributed this result to the level of education of participants and contact with science and environmental education activities.These results, together with data from this study demonstrate the importance of awareness and learning of both rural and urban on the interaction of human beings with all animal population.Silva (2006) reported that 65% of respondents from the rural municipality of Rio Branco in Acre staded said killed the snakes when they meet them.Only 12% of one population surveyed by Moura et al. (2010) stated that environmental police or call IBAMA (Brazilian environmental agency), while 14% said they would allow the snakes to leave without harming them.Again the importance of ethnozoology snakes allied with studies of the practice of environmental education become important tools to have passed the information correctly and to people in general.

Species
A large part of the population cannot differentiate between venomous and nonvenomous snakes because they lack sufficient knowledge or because they try to identify them erroneously, often only by means of coloration, head shape or tail size, among others.These characteristics lead to errors, a fact that can explain why the percentage of nonvenomous snakes was higher than that of venomous snakes.
Logic would dictate that the killing of snakes would decrease with greater awareness about them.Therefore, investigation of the knowledge of a determined community about the local fauna is important to define and orient environmental education campaigns aiming at preserving animal species.The investigation of traditional zoological knowledge, zootherapeutic practices and environmental education can allow greater clarification about snakes and reduce fear of them.Such efforts are necessary for better understanding and to propose strategies to preserve natural resources together with the human population of each region.

Table 2 .
Distribution of the injuries according to the position, number and danger level of the snakes.50% of respondents said they could differentiate snakes from its default color, the shape of the head among other things.Many of these features can confuse most people, but are used by them, although they are typical features of European or African vipers, now widely disseminated to all Brazilian species.