Glutamine dipeptide supplementation improves clinical responses in patients with diabetic foot syndrome

1Pharmaceutical Sciences Postgraduate Program State University of Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brazil, 2Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, State University of Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brazil, 3Department of Morphological Sciences, State University of Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brazil, 4Department of Clinical Analysis and Biomedicine, State University of Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brazil, 5Department of Biochemistry State University of Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brazil, 6Department of Medicine State University of Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brazil


INTRODUCTION
Diabetic foot syndrome has been defined as a pathological condition in which peripheral vascular disease, peripheral neuropathy, and infection lead to tissue destruction, resulting in possible lower-extremity amputation in people with diabetes (Canavan et al., 2008).
Nerve damage in feet is characterized by increased oxidative stress, which leads to loss of neurons by apoptosis thereby reducing the regenerative capacity (Vicent et al., 2004), associated with loss of foot sensitivity.Diabetic foot ulcers are very common in diabetic patients and may lead to amputation (Schirmer, Ritter, Fansa, 2013).Moreover, following amputation, 45% of patients with neuropathic ulcers and 55% of patients with ischemic ulcers die within 5 years (Armstrong, Wrobel, Robbins, 2007).
The amino acid glutamine is involved in many processes that are vital to cell function.The molecular mechanisms of glutamine action remain to be elucidated but may involve changes in gene and protein expression, protein activity, and changes in oxidative status (Newsholme et al., 2003).For this reason, the enteral and parenteral administration of glutamine has been recommended for critically ill patients (Newsholme et al., 2011;Vasconcelos, Tirapegui, 2002).In addition, oral glutamine has been used by healthy individuals, in particular by athletes, to maintain immune function (Cury-Boaventura et al., 2008).Moreover, it has been reported that glutamine supplementation caused a reduction in systolic blood pressure, hyperglycemia, abdominal circumference (Mansour et al., 2015), and improved insulin secretion (Samocha-Bonet et al., 2015).
Although oral glutamine treatment is beneficial for human health, its low solubility and stability in aqueous solutions limits its availability in the blood.Furthermore, about 50% of orally administered glutamine is extracted by the splanchnic bed in healthy humans (Matthews, Marano, Campbell, 1993).However, this problem can be overcome with highly soluble stable L-alanyl-L-glutamine, a synthetic dipeptide composed of alanine and glutamine (Minguette-Camara et al., 2014;Rogero et al., 2002) which is commonly known as glutamine dipeptide (GDP).
Thus, based on the therapeutic potential of GDP, we evaluated the impact of supplementation with this dipeptide on the metabolic profile, oxidative stress, hematological parameters and blood levels of cytokines.
In this clinical investigation we used a wellestablished experimental approach in which each patient served as their own control (Sekhar et al., 2011;Borges-Santos et al., 2012;Nguyen et al., 2014) eliminating the interference of several factors such as age, duration of diabetes, and gender.During the consultation, patients were interviewed using a questionnaire to obtain information about their socio-demographic and disease factors (age, sex, medical history, educational level, marital status, duration of diabetes, diabetes-related disorders etc.), therapeutic profile, and lifestyle.

PATIENTS AND METHODS
Regarding diabetes, 33.3% of the patients had been diagnosed with diabetes at least 10 years ago, 44.4% of the patients had been diagnosed for 11 to 20 years ago and 22.2% of the patients had been diagnosed over 21 years ago.Most patients were female (83.3%), over 60 years of age (61.1%), sedentary (55.6), non-smokers (94.4%) and had at least 8 years of schooling (77.7%).
Despite the fact that most patients had a family history of type 2 diabetes (88.9%), the majority of patients showed an absence of knowledge about diabetic foot syndrome (55.6%).

Study Design
After the interview, a foot examination based on the National Hansen's Disease Program developed by the University of Baton Rouge, USA was performed.This diabetic foot screening is not used to diagnose peripheral neuropathy, but to identify those patients who have lost protective sensation.The foot examination uses a 5.07 monofilament, which delivers 10 g of force to 12 locations on each foot, i.e., 24 points of sensation in total (Tan, 2010).
Venous blood was collected from each patient after an overnight fast as previously described (Zubioli et al., 2013).After blood collection, hematological parameters were measured.In addition, serum glucose, triacylglycerol, total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), gamma glutamyltransferase (gamma GT), total protein, albumin, urea, and creatinine were evaluated by using kits from BioSys® and analyzed on Vitalab SelectraE® equipment.C-reactive protein was evaluated by using the CardioPhase hsCRP kit (Siemens®) and analyzed on a Siemens® nephelometer.Moreover, antioxidant activity was evaluated by means of total antioxidant capacity (Erel, 2004) and protein thiol groups (Faure, Lafond, 1995).
Patients were required to ingest GDP (Ajinomoto North America, NC, USA) which was supplied in sachets (10 g), and was dissolved in water immediately before using, once a day, after lunch or after dinner (20 g/day), for 30 days.After this period of treatment, all clinical procedures were repeated (blood collection, biochemical and hematological evaluation, quantification of cytokines and foot examination).
The effect of the treatment with GDP was evaluated by comparing each patient before (day 1) and after treatment (day 30).In this way, each patient served as his or her own control.

Statistical analysis
For statistical analysis we used the software R.2.10.1.Results were analyzed using the Wilcoxon test for comparing values before and after treatment.For quantitative variables, the Spearmanʼs correlation was used.Data were reported as the mean ± standard error (M ± SE).A p<0.05 level of probability was accepted as a statistically significant difference for all comparisons.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A total of 18 patients with type 2 diabetes completed the study, while the remaining four patients were excluded because they did not take the GDP treatment as recommended.
Supplementation with GDP reduced (P=0.048) the number of areas on the foot that lacked sensation from 5.9 ± 1.5 to 4.1 ± 1.3.Moreover, individual evaluation (Table I) showed that 10 patients (55.5%) experienced a reduction in the number of points without sensation after supplementation with GDP.In agreement with these results, supplementation with glutamine has been shown to reduce the loss of neurons in the duodenum of diabetic rats.This effect was attributed to the neuroprotective effect of glutamine which prevents oxidative stress by increasing the availability of reduced glutathione from glutamine (Zanoni et al., 2011).
It should be emphasized that partial recovery of sensation occurred in the presence of reduced (P=0.047)fasting hyperglycemia and increased (P<0.01)HDL after treatment with GDP.However, total cholesterol, triacylglycerol, total protein, and albumin remained unchanged (Table II).
The increased HDL-C, i.e., 2.9 mg/dL (Table II), is very important considering that: a) an elevation of 1 mg/ dL has been shown to reduce the risk of microvascular complications in type 2 diabetic patients (Toth et al., 2012); b) patients with diabetic foot syndrome have a higher risk of cardiovascular disease (Pinto et al., 2008); and c) hyperlipidemia is associated with diabetic neuropathy (Callaghan et al., 2012).
The increased urea values (P<0.001) after GDP supplementation (Table II) confirm the increased ingestion of this dipeptide.
The blood values of creatinine, AST, ALT, and GGT remained unaltered (Table II), suggesting the absence of renal and hepatic toxicity as consequence of supplementation with oral GDP.In agreement with these observations, it has been reported that glutamine (44-60 g/ day) does not cause any side effects (Bushen et al., 2004).
In agreement with previous studies (Weigelt et al., 2009;Whitmont et al., 2013), we observed high blood levels of C-reactive protein (a marker of acute inflammation) before GDP treatment.However, C-reactive protein levels were not influenced by GDP treatment (Table II).This result could be partly explained by the fact that there is a simultaneous increase in the blood levels of pro-inflammatory (IFN-α, IFN-γ, IL-6, IL-7) and antiinflammatory (IL-4, IL-13, IL-12 p40) cytokines (Table III).
However, how can the synchronous increase of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines during GDP supplementation be accounted for?
We suggest that the simultaneous rise of proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines during GDP supplementation is indicative of a pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory balance.In agreement with this suggestion, we previously reported a concurrent increase of blood pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines during an oral glucose tolerance test (Bazotte et al., 2016;Eik Filho et al., 2016).Furthermore, other studies have also demonstrated activation of pro-inflammatory and antiinflammatory cytokines during sepsis (Mancilla-Ramírez et al., 1993), diabetes (Chatzigeorgiou et al., 2010), and infections (Ng et al., 2003).
This balance of pro-inflammatory and antiinflammatory cytokines could represent an important negative feedback mechanism, which protects the body from excessive inflammation and its consequences.
Regarding the involvement of cytokines, it must be noted that these substances show pleiotropic effects in modulating immune responses and chronic inflammation (Akdis et al., 2011;Dinarello, 2007).
In summary, the significant increases in IFN-α, IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-6, IL-7, IL-13, and IL-12 p40 may improve the immune responses after oral treatment with GDP.In agreement, with this proposition, as shown in Table IV, oral supplementation with GDP also increased the number of circulating leukocytes (P=0.037),eosinophils (P=0.049) and typical lymphocytes (P<0.001).
Our results are of clinical relevance, as treatment with oral GDP (20 g/day) over a period of 30 days improved clinical responses in patients with diabetic foot syndrome.

TABLE I -
Individual evaluations of the number of areas on the foot without sensation (NAFWS) in type 2 diabetic patients before supplementation (BS) and after supplementation (AS) with glutamine dipeptide.The numbers 1-18 represent each patient included in the study

TABLE II -
Biochemical and toxicological parameters (mean ± standard error) of diabetic patients before and after supplementation with glutamine dipeptide.Number of patients = 18 Non parametric Wilcoxon test.A P value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

TABLE III -
Serum cytokines levels (pg/mL) of diabetic patients before and after supplementation with glutamine dipeptide.N = number of patients

TABLE IV -
Hematological parameters of diabetic patients before and after supplementation with glutamine dipeptide (mean ± standard error).Number of patients = 18 Amplitude of the distribution of erythrocyte size (ADES), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC).*Non parametric Wilcoxon test.A P value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.