Defense-related proteins involved in sugarcane responses to biotic stress

Abstract Sugarcane is one of the most important agricultural crops in the world. However, pathogen infection and herbivore attack cause constant losses in yield. Plants respond to pathogen infection by inducing the expression of several protein types, such as glucanases, chitinases, thaumatins, peptidase inhibitors, defensins, catalases and glycoproteins. Proteins induced by pathogenesis are directly or indirectly involved in plant defense, leading to pathogen death or inducing other plant defense responses. Several of these proteins are induced in sugarcane by different pathogens or insects and have antifungal or insecticidal activity. In this review, defense-related proteins in sugarcane are described, with their putative mechanisms of action, pathogen targets and biotechnological perspectives.


Introduction
Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids) is the primary source of sugar and renewable biofuel energy worldwide. With high carbohydrate content, favorable energy input/output ratio and high biomass production capacity, sugarcane is one of the best options to generate biofuel (Hoang et al., 2015). The growing global demand for energy has led to increased interest in the development of new sugarcane cultivars with high productivity for use as bioenergy feedstock (Hoang et al., 2015).
Plants respond to biotic stress by constitutive or inducible defense mechanisms. Many defense related (DR) proteins have been identified in different plants after infection by fungi, oomycetes, bacteria and viruses or attack by insects and nematodes (Van Loon, 1999;Van Loon et al., 2006).
Plant microbe-induced proteins and their homologs are usually collectively called as "pathogenesis-related" (PR) proteins. However, this concept has been revised to include only proteins induced by pathogens and which are mostly not detectable in their absence (Van Loon et al., 2006). In plant defense responses, PRs affect pathogen or herbivore development (Ryan, 1990;Bohlmann and Broekaert, 1994;Broekaert et al., 1995) or stimulate plant defensive barriers (Van Loon et al., 2006).
Other proteins are also involved in plant defense, such as NBS-LRR proteins, which recognize a wide variety of pathogens and insects , glycoproteins (MMMGs and HMMGs), which are produced after pathogen infection and modify some physiological functions of the invader (Legaz et al., 1998), catalases, which are antioxidant enzymes that detoxify reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Sharma et al., 2012) and WRKY proteins, which comprise a large family of transcription factors that recognize the W box (TTGACC/T) type DNA sequence, which is found in the promoters of many plant defense genes (Rushton et al., 1996).

PR families and their sugarcane homologs
PR proteins were first reported in a tobacco variety hypersensitive to tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) infection (Van Loon and Van Kammen, 1970). PRs are classified into 17 different families, PR-1 to PR-17, based on their primary structure and biological activity (Van Loon et al., 1994;van Loon et al., 2006). New PR families have been proposed, such as the PR-18, which was first purified from sunflower (Custers et al., 2004) and the PR-19, which was identified in Scots pine (Sooriyaarachchi et al., 2011).
Several sugarcane proteins presenting homology to different PR families were already described. PR proteins in sugarcane are induced by fungi, bacteria, oomycetes, viruses and insects (Table 1). These PR proteins showed antimicrobial or insecticidal activity (Table 1).

PR-1 family
The most abundant PR in Nicotiana tabacum is in the PR-1 family, with a high level of induction (~10,000-fold) in response to pathogen infection (Alexander et al., 1993). PR-1 induction increased the tolerance of different plants, such as tomato, tobacco and Arabidopsis, to pathogens, affecting fungal development (Niderman et al, 1995;Segarra et al., 2013). In transgenic tobacco plants that overexpress the PR-1a gene, tolerance to infection by two oomycetes, Peronospora tabacina and Phytophthora parasitica var. nicotianae, was improved (Alexander et al., 1993). Proteins in the PR-1 family from tobacco and tomato have different levels of fungicidal activity and affect the germination of Phytophthora infestans zoospores (Niderman et al., 1995). PR-1 gene expression was increased in Arabidopsis Souza et al. 361 Table 1 -Defense related proteins identified in sugarcane in response to biotic stress.
In sugarcane, b-1,3-glucanase genes are differentially expressed after C. falcatum (Prathima et al., 2013) and S. scitamineum (Su et al., 2013) infection, with different expression profiles. In response to both S. scitamineum infection and abiotic stresses, ScGluA1 (KC848050) was upregulated, whereas ScGluD1 (KC848051) was slightly down-regulated (Su et al., 2013). The activity was variable for b-1,3-glucanase in genotypes with different levels of susceptibility to S. scitamineum. For example, following infection with S. scitamineum, glucanase activity increases more rapidly and last longer in a variety of sugarcane resistant to smut than in a susceptible one (Su et al., 2013).

Chitinases (PR-3, PR-4, PR-8 and PR-11 families)
Chitinases are enzymes that hydrolyze the b-1,4-linkage between N-acetylglucosamine residues of chitin, which is a structural polysaccharide that is the primary component of cell walls of several types of fungi and exoskeletons of invertebrates . In the molecular defense of plants, chitinases degrade the chitin in fungal cell walls, with a consequent inhibition of pathogen growth (Schlumbaum et al., 1986). These proteins are grouped in several classes based on sequence similarity and are distributed in four PR families: PR-3, PR-4, PR-8 and PR-11 (Neuhaus, 1999).
Chitinase proteins in sugarcane are associated with responses to biotic and abiotic stresses (Su et al., 2014a(Su et al., , 2015.The ScChiVII1 gene showed differential expression pattern in sugarcane genotypes resistant and susceptible to smut . Transcript levels of chitinase genes were differentially expressed after infection by the fungi C. falcatum (Sundar et al., 2008;Rahul et al., 2013), S. scitamineum (Su et al., 2014a(Su et al., , 2015Que et al., 2014) and Giberella fujikuroi (Lin et al., 2010). Additionally, the constitutive chitinase activity was higher in sugarcane varieties resistant to red rot disease than in susceptible genotypes (Viswanathan, 2012).
The sugarcane chitinase ScChi, an acidic class III chitinase (PR-8 family), has antifungal activity and inhibits the hyphal growth of Fusarium solani var. coeruleum (Que et al., 2014). Moreover, sugarcane chitinases showed action against C. falcatum and are also associated with Pseudomonas-mediated induced resistance (Viswanathan et al., 2003) and with sugarcane response to D. saccharalis attack (Medeiros et al., 2012).
Transcript levels of genes encoding SUGARWINs were up-regulated in response to mechanical wounding, sugarcane borer (D. saccharalis) attack and methyl jasmonate treatment (Medeiros et al., 2012). Although induced by D. saccharalis damage, SUGARWIN2 proteins have no insecticidal activity; however, these proteins have an antimicrobial role against the opportunistic fungi Fusarium verticillioides (Medeiros et al., 2012) and C. falcatum (Franco et al., 2014), which typically develop after sugarcane borer attacks. Based on these results, SUGARWIN2 proteins are likely involved in a finely regulated defense mechanism in which insect damage induces plant defenses against imminent opportunistic fungi (Medeiros et al., 2012;Franco et al., 2014). Moreover, the sugarcane pathogenic fungus C. paradoxa was affected by SUGARWIN2, but the nonpathogenic fungi Aspergillus nidulans and Saccharomyces cerevisiae are not (Franco et al., 2014). With SUGARWIN2, the morphogenesis and viability of the target fungus were affected by increasing vacuolization, points of fractures and overflow of intracellular material, which lead to cell death (Medeiros et al., 2012;Franco et al., 2014). 362 Defense-related proteins in sugarcane Thaumatin-like proteins (PR-5 family) Thaumatin-like proteins (TLPs) have a sequence similar to that of thaumatin, a protein extracted from Thaumatococcus daniellii (a west African shrub). Thaumatin is a monomeric protein composed of 207 residues and stabilized by eight disulfide bonds (Kim et al., 1988). TLPs are induced by biotic and abiotic stresses Rajam et al., 2007). In in vitro assays, the plasma membranes (PL) of fungi were disrupted by the antifungal activity of TLPs (Vigers et al., 1992).The mechanisms responsible for the fungal plasma membrane rupture are the direct insertion of TLP in its membrane (formation of pores), causing changes in membrane permeability (Roberts and Selitrennikoff, 1990), or by the hydrolysis of b-1,3-glucans from fungal cell walls (Grenier et al., 1999).

Peptidase inhibitors (PR-6 family)
Peptidase inhibitors (PIs) in plants are important in the control of endogenous and exogenous peptidase activity. The activity of PIs in plant defense is primarily to inhibit the peptidases secreted by insects and pathogenic microorganisms with the digestion of these proteins (Habib and Fazili, 2007).
Plant cystatins, or phytocystatins (PhyCys), are one of the most studied plant protease inhibitors (Benchabane et al., 2010). They are competitive and reversible inhibitors of cysteine proteases (Martínez and Díaz, 2008). The genes of the cystatin family have been identified and characterized in some plant species, demonstrating functions in defense against pathogens (Bobek and Levine, 1992;Gutierrez-Campos et al., 1999;Belenghi et al., 2003), in response to insect attack (Goulet et al., 2008;Konrad et al., 2008;Liang et al., 2015), in programmed cell death (Solomon et al., 1999;Zhao et al., 2013), in seed germination (Hwang et al., 2009, Zhao et al., 2014, and in responses to abiotic environmental stresses (Hwang et al., 2010). Furthermore, the genes in the cystatin family were differentially expressed in response to different abiotic/biotic stresses, with essential roles in plant defense and hypersensitive cell death (Koiwaet al. 2000;Belenghi et al. 2003;van der Linde et al., 2012. Canecystatin, a sugarcane phytocystatin, is composed of 106 amino acid residues and typically seems to occur as a domain-swapped dimer in solution (Valadares et al., 2013). The canecystatin dimerization mechanism turns this inhibitor inactive, avoiding the inhibition of nontarget endogenous cysteine peptidases (Valadares et al., 2013).
The Sugarcane Genome Project SUCEST was the first to characterize canecystatin (Soares-Costa et al., 2002). Following recombinant expression and purification, the antifungal activity of canecystatin was demonstrated against Trichoderma reesei by reducing germination of the filamentous fungus (Soares-Costa et al., 2002). The canecystatin provided inhibitory effect against thiol peptidases, showing that may provide protection for sugarcane against fungi and insects (Oliva et al., 2004). Purified from transgenic sugarcane, His-tagged CaneCPI-1 affects the catalytic activity of cysteine peptidases partially purified from the midgut of the coleopteran S. levis (sugarcane weevil; Ribeiro et al., 2008). Furthermore, some sugarcane cystatins present high homology with the mir 1 gene from maize, which inhibits the growth of a wide range of lepidopteran species (Pechan et al., 2000). These results corroborate that cystatins have potential roles in the defense of sugarcane against insect pests.
In addition to the well-described cysteine peptidase inhibitors, sugarcane also has serine peptidase inhibitors of the Bowman-Birk type (BBI) (Mello et al., 2003). BBIs are small double-headed serine peptidase inhibitors that are highly stabilized by several disulfide bonds (Birk, 1985). Sugarcane likely has at least 14 BBI genes, with highly variable compositions of the amino acid sequences (Mello et al., 2003). The introduction of soybean Bowman-Birk and Kunitz-type serine peptidase inhibitors into sugarcane transgenic lines significantly retards the development of D. saccharalis, although the damage caused by this herbivore was not prevented (Falco and Silva-Filho, 2003).

Endoproteinases (PR-7 family)
The proteins in the PR-7 family are similar to potato alkaline endoproteinase p-69, which is the primary PR in tomato involved in the response to citrus exocortis viroid (CEV) infection (Vera and Conejero, 1988), and to the subtilisin serine protease family (Tornero et al., 1997). Endoproteinases are essential in hydrolyzing peptide bonds in the process of protein degradation. The role of these proteins in biotic defense is unclear, but these proteins may contribute to the dissolution of microbial cell walls (van Loon et al., 2006) or to the posttranslational modification of proteins involved in plant defense (Tornero et al., 1996). The genes P69B and P69C from tomato inserted into transgenic Arabidopsis are induced by salicylic acid and by plant interaction with Pseudomonas syringae (Jordá and Vera, 2000).
Endoproteinase genes with diverse substrate specificity are reported in sugarcane, but their involvement in plant defense remains to be explored (Correa et al., 2001;Ramos and Selistre-de-Araujo, 2001;Santos-Silva et al., 2012).

Peroxidases (PR-9 family)
Peroxidases are glycoproteins that catalyze the oxidation of several organic and inorganic substrates by H 2 O 2 and are involved in a wide variety of physiological and plant defense processes (Chittoor et al., 1999). Peroxidases respond to biotic stress by affecting cell wall cross-linking and by creating an unfavorable environment for pathogen growth in plants with the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Passardi et al., 2005). The role of peroxidases in plant cell walls is associated with the biosynthesis of lignin, which is a phenolic biopolymer synthesized for mechanical support and in response to pathogen attack in vascular plants (Østergaard et al., 2000). For example, ATP A2 peroxidase in Arabidopsis thaliana is a lignin-associated peroxidase that was potentially used in defense against pathogens (Østergaard et al., 2000).
In sugarcane, peroxidase activity increases after inoculation with the pathogen C. falcatum (red rot) (Sundar et al., 2006), with a greater increase in activity in a resistant genotype than in a susceptible one (Asthir et al., 2009). Additionally, an elicitor isolated from C. falcatum induces peroxidase activity in sugarcane leaves and in suspensioncultured cells (Sundar et al., 2002). For sugarcane varieties with different levels of susceptibility to S. scitamineum, enzyme activity levels were also variable, with higher increases in activity in a resistant genotype than in a susceptible one after inoculation with the pathogen (Esh et al., 2014). Transcripts encoding peroxidase genes were also induced in sugarcane tissues infected by Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus (Lambais, 2001) and during interaction with Puccinia melanocephala .
In sugarcane, PR-10 homologs were induced after treatment with the defense-regulator methyl jasmonate (MJ) (Bower et al., 2005) and inoculation of sugarcane buds with S. scitamineum (Que et al., 2014) and in response to P. melanocephala infection (Oloriz et al. 2012).

Defensins (PR-12 family)
Plant defensins are small, cysteine-rich antimicrobial peptides found in several organisms, typically with a characteristic b-fold (Stotz et al., 2009). These cationic peptides, likely act as antimicrobial molecules that induce the formation of pores in pathogen membranes or modify membrane permeability by a mechanism based on electrostatic charge (Thomma et al., 2002).

Lipid-transferproteins (PR-14 family)
Lipid-transfer proteins (LTPs) are small, basic and cysteine-rich lipid-binding proteins in plants that transport lipids between membranes in vitro (Rueckert and Schmidt, 1990). These proteins are observed in plant cell walls, with putative roles in cutin biosynthesis and in response to biotic and abiotic stresses (Kader, 1997). Genes encoding the PR-14 type-member, barley LTP4, are differentially induced after fungal and bacterial inoculation (Molina and García-Olmedo, 1993;Molina et al., 1996).

Other defense-related proteins in sugarcane NBS-LRR proteins
Plant NBS-LRR proteins are used to recognize a wide variety of pathogens and insects . These proteins encoded by plant resistance genes contain two typical domains: a nucleotide binding site (NBS) and a leucinerich repeat (LRR). Plant NBS-LRR proteins detect the effector molecules of pathogens that are responsible for virulence. The NBS-LRR class of R genes is categorized into TIR and non-TIR classes based on sequence similarity in the region that precedes the NBS domain. The plant NBS-LRR proteins in the TIR class transport the TOLL/interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) and are called TNL proteins (Joshi and Navak, 2011). The TIR class was found in most dicots but is rare or absent in monocots (Bai et al., 2002;Meyers et al., 2003). The proteins in the non-TIR class are typically called CNL proteins, with most members containing a coiled-coil (CC) N-terminal domain or zinc finger and RPW8 domains (Meyers et al., 2002, DeYoung andInnes, 2006). The CNL class was found in both dicots and monocots (Pan et al., 2000).
Red-rot-related NBS-LRR genes were found in sugarcane EST databases (Gupta et al., 2010); these genes were up-regulated in response to C. falcatum challenge, suggesting a possible role in systemic acquired resistance, SAR (Selvaraj et al., 2014). These genes were also induced in sugarcane somaclonal variants during interaction with P. melanocephala ). An NBS-LRR class resistance-gene, non-TIR-NBS-LRR-type, was induced in sugarcane in response to infection by S. scitamineum, the causal agent of smut (Borrás-Hidalgo et al., 2005;Que et al., 2009).
Resistance-associated genes that encode an NBS domain have been identified in plants using disease resistance gene analog (RGA) markers (Sekhwal et al., 2015). RGA sequences are a large set of potential resistance-associated 364 Defense-related proteins in sugarcane genes with conserved domains. The NBS domain was used to amplify RGA fragments from various plant species (Wang et al., 2001). For example, NBS-RGA analogs from wheat and soybean were used to amplify NBS-LRR DNA in sugarcane; the genes identified were associated with resistance against yellow leaf virus (SCYLV) and moderate resistance against rust caused by P. melanocephala (Glynn et al., 2008). Non-TIR-NBS-LRR resistance genes (Xa1 and RPS2) and TIR-NBS-LRR resistance genes (L6 and N) were also identified in sequences of RGAs from smutresistant sugarcane (Que et al., 2009). Eighteen other sugarcane NBS-LRR gene homologs were found in the SUCEST database with homology to maize and rice varieties resistant to rust (Rossi et al., 2003). Analyses of these genes may enhance the understanding of stress-responsive pathways in sugarcane and lead to the development of markers for disease.

Glycoproteins
The production of glycoproteins is likely the primary response of sugarcane to infection by pathogens (Fontaniella et al., 2002). These macromolecules are found in plant cell walls (Martínez et al. 1990) and are of two types, mid molecular mass glycoproteins (MMMGs) or high molecular mass glycoproteins (HMMGs) (Legaz et al., 1998).
In response to the entry of a pathogen, sugarcane glycoproteins (MMMGs and HMMGs) are produced that modify some physiological functions of the invader. These glycoproteins were first isolated from sugarcane juice produced in response to mechanical injuries (Legaz et al., 1998).
The inoculation of sugarcane with smut teliospores of S. scitamineum induces a significant increase in concentration of HMMGs, the polymers from which MMMGs are derived (Martínez et al. 1990). In other studies on smut disease, both types of glycoproteins act against the fungus by increasing cytoagglutination and decreasing the germination of teliospores by 50% (Fontaniella et al., 2002) or by preventing cell polarization with inhibition of germination tube protrusion and spore germination (Millanes et al., 2005). Furthermore, HMMGs and MMMGs produced by healthy sugarcane cause a complete inhibition of smut mycelium growth (Millanes et al., 2008).
Xanthomonas albilineans is the causal agent of leaf scald, a bacterial-vascular disease in sugarcane. Sugarcane HMMGs and MMMGs act as cell-to-bacterial signals inducing the production of xanthan, an exocellular polysaccharide, by X. albilineans. The production of xanthan is likely caused by inhibition of bacterial proteases by these glycoproteins, which consequently protects the enzymes responsible for xanthan biosynthesis from proteolytic degradation (Legaz et al., 2011).

Catalases
Catalase was the first antioxidant enzyme discovered and characterized. In plants, these enzymes detoxify reactive oxygen species (ROS). Catalases are hemeproteins that have high specificity for H 2 O 2 and catalyze the dismutation of two molecules of H 2 O 2 into water and oxygen (Sharma et al., 2012).
The elicitor of C. falcatum induces variable levels of catalase in suspension-cultured sugarcane cells (Sundar and Vidhyasekaran, 2003). Moreover, high catalase activity was found in two cultivars with varying sensitivity to C. falcatum after inoculation with conidia of red rot fungus (Asthir et al., 2009).
After inoculation with S. scitamineum, the expression of the catalase gene (ScCAT1) in sugarcane increases significantly, which suggests that ScCAT1 protects plants against reactive oxidant-related fungal stimuli. Based on this study, a positive correlation between activity of catalase and smut resistance in sugarcane was also confirmed (Su et al., 2014b). Furthermore, the transcription and expression of the catalase gene were also induced by this interaction (Que et al., 2014).

WRKY proteins
WRKY proteins are a large family of transcription factors. These proteins are named because of a highly conserved 60 amino acid-long WRKY domain, which is composed of the highly conserved motif WRKYGQK at the N-terminus and a novel metal-chelating zinc finger signature at the C-terminus (Agarwal et al., 2011). WRKY proteins recognize the W box (TTGACC/T) type DNA sequence, which was found in the promoters of many plant defense genes (Rushton et al., 1996). WRKY proteins are involved in differential responses to biotic stresses in plants, either as transcriptional activators or as repressors of pathogen-induced defense programs (Eulgem, et al., 2000;Dong et al., 2003;Ulker and Somssich, 2004;Journot-Catalino et al., 2006). Plant WRKY transcriptional factors are activated as part of the plant innate immune system and are triggered by pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMP-triggered immunity or PTI) and pathogen virulent effectors (effector-triggered immunity or ETI) (Jones and Dangl, 2006). The high percentage of genes in this family compared with that of other multigene families that also encode plant transcription factors suggests that biotic stresses may have played a key role in the expansion of the WRKY family (Ulker and Somssich, 2004;Agarwal et al., 2011).

Biotechnology potential of defense-related proteins in sugarcane
Induced systemic resistance (ISR) is one strategy that has been described as a potential weapon to improve sugarcane resistance to biotic stresses. Rhizobacterial strains of Pseudomonas (nonpathogenic bacteria) were associated with increased resistance in sugarcane to C. falcatum by inducing PR proteins in stalk tissues (Viswanathan et al., 2003) and by increasing chitinases with antifungal activity (Viswanathan and Samiyappan, 2001;Viswanathan et al., 2005).
PR proteins from the families PR-13, PR-15, PR-16, PR-17, PR-18 and PR-19, with homologs not yet found in sugarcane, can also be potential targets for RGA markers for enhanced resistance to pathogens. PR-13 (thionins) destroy fungal and bacterial membranes (Bohlmann and Broekaert, 1994) and in barley and Arabidopsis inhibited the growth of the sugarcane phytopathogenic fungi Thielaviopsis paradoxa (Reimann-Philipp et al., 1989) and Fusarium oxysporum (Epple et al., 1997), respectively. Oxalate oxidases (PR-15 family) and oxalate-oxidase-like proteins (PR-16 family) are correlated with the generation of hydrogen peroxide, which produces a toxic environment to the pathogen or stimulates directly or indirectly plant defense responses (Van Loon et al., 2006). Members of the newly described PR-17 family (Nt PRp27 like) were observed in response to Blumeria graminis in barley (Christensen et al., 2002), induced by the synthetic benzo (1,2,3) thiadiazole-7-carbothioic acid S-methyl ester (BTH) in wheat (Görlach et al., 1996) and upon mosaic virus infection in tobacco. PR-18 (fungus-and SA-inducible carbohydrate oxydases) enhanced resistance to infection by bacteria in tobacco transgenic plants (Custers et al., 2004). Recently, a new PR protein with antimicrobial effect was identified in Pinus sylvestris and named PR-19 (Sooriyaarachchi et al., 2011). This protein binds to fungal cell wall glucans altering cell wall structure which leads to morphological distortion of hyphae (Sooriyaarachchi et al., 2011).
Recently, RNA interference also has been used for control of sugarcane diseases. RNAi of endochitinases in the sugarcane endophyte Trichoderma virens 223 was used as a form of biocontrol for C. paradoxa (Romão-Dumaresq et al., 2012). RNAi has been used for development of viral resistant plants (Kim et al., 2013;Ntui et al., 2013). Gene silencing has proven to be effective to obtain multistrain resistant sugarcane plants for mosaic disease (Potyvirus sugarcane mosaic virus -ScMV and/or Sorghum mosaic virus -SrMV) (Guo et al., 2015).
Studies have reported that microRNA-guided gene regulation was essential for tolerance to biotic stresses (Gupta et al., 2014). Thiebaut et al. (2012) identified several microRNAs in sugarcane after inoculation with Acidovorax avenae subsp avenae. These new microRNAs have a potential use for genetic engineering of stressresistant plants and can contribute to an improved understanding of regulatory pathways for defense-related proteins.
The development of transgenic plants is another strategy proposed to increase resistance to pathogens. For example, the insertion of single genes encoding PR proteins, such as b-1,3-glucanase (Sundaresha et al., 2010) or thaumatin-like proteins (Chen et al., 1999;Datta et al., 1999;Velazhahan and Muthukrishnan, 2003;Schestibratov and Dolgov, 2005), in transgenic plants increases host resistance against fungi. Additionally, transgenic plants that express more than one PR-encoding gene have also been considered as a strategy to improve plant resistance to pathogens (Anand et al., 2003;Amian et al., 2011).

Concluding remarks
Sugarcane is one of the most important commodities worldwide, primarily for sugar and biofuel production. However, despite the significant agronomical relevance, little is known about the role of proteins in sugarcane defense when compared with other plant species. Improving our knowledge of sugarcane defense mechanisms against pathogens is still a great challenge to be achieved.