A review of the monotypic genus Chilelimnophila Alexander (Diptera: Tipulomorpha: Limoniidae)

Chilelimnophila lyra (Alexander, 1952), a unica especie do genero Chilelimnophila Alexander, 1968, do Chile, e redescrita com base em novos especimes de areas proximas a localidade tipo e outras areas. Interpretacoes incorretas da descricao original sao corrigidas. As estruturas anatomicas do imago sao descritas e ilustradas em detalhe, incluindo informacoes sobre as femeas, ate entao desconhecidas. Melhores subsidios para o reconhecimento do taxon sao fornecidos.

ability of more specimens from Chiloé Island without indicating how many and did not add substantive information on the species morphology.
During a research visit by the author to the National Museum of Natural History of the Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC, USA (USNM) in 2004, an effort of examining samples of undetermined Chilean crane flies in the Alexander Collection resulted in the finding of additional material of Chilelimnophila lyra. These specimens, coming from two different localities (including a locality adjacent to Curacautín, the type locality), add considerably to the number of known specimens of this interesting and poorly known species. These specimens allow for a redescription of the taxon, with a study on its morphology which is more detailed than those by Alexander (1952Alexander ( , 1968. This redescription is aimed to provide better grounds for the recognition of Chilelimnophila (and its single included species). Alexander (1952), described Limnophila lyra from Chile, referring to a single specimen from Curacautín (Malleco Province) designated as the holotype. Alexander (1952) considered this fly as a very distinctive species. Its original placement in Limnophila was admittedly provisional as the distinctive morphology of the antenna and male terminalia would require the erection of a new higher group for it. Alexander (1968) then erected for the inclusion of Limnophila lyra the genus Chilelimnophila. The heterogeneity and artificiality of Limnophila has been previously recognized by Alexander (e.g., Alexander, 1924, 1929, and the proposal of a monotypic genus for this distinctive species seemed fully justified. A more rigorous demonstration of Limnophila paraphyly (Ribeiro, 2006a;Ribeiro, 2007) corroborates this decision. Alexander (1968) mentioned the avail-It may also be useful in the eventual discovery of new taxa related to C. lyra, and for future comparative studies.

MATeRIAL AnD MeThoDs
The studied specimens belong to the Alexander Collection of Crane Flies housing at USNM. Descriptive terminology follows McAlpine (1981) for most characters. The adopted terminology for the wing veins is shown in Figure 5. The terminology for the structures of the male gonostylus is in accordance with Ribeiro (2006b).
Dissections of the head, thorax, male and female terminalia were cleared in warmed KOH and mounted for study in non-permanent slides with glycerol. After study and illustration the dissected structures were transferred to microvials with glycerol and pinned with their corresponding specimens. Illustrations were made with a drawing tube attached to a compound microscope. Measurements were taken with an ocular reticule. Photographs were taken with a digital photography system attached to both stereoscopic and compound microscopes. Details on the examined specimens are as follows (label information in italics; information of different labels separated by a vertical line; precise information on locality within square brackets): Note: Only the specimens from Chiloé Island were referred to by Alexander (1968), who erroneously indicated them as having being collected in 1945.
Specimens found in the USNM collection: 12 males and 2 females. CHILE: Curacautín, Rio Blanco, 12-20 January, 1959  Note: The labels of these specimens do not include information on collector. Basing on the collecting date and localities, it can be assumed that the collector was L.E. Peña (Oliver Flint, personal communication).
Diagnosis: Chilelimnophila can be recognized by the following characters combined: first flagellomere ovoid, constricted at base; first three to four flagellomeres partially fused in the male, ovoid and not fused in the female; tibial spurs covered with tiny hairs; clasper of gonostylus glabrous, bifid and with its distalmost branch serrated; lateral process of aedeagal sheath long, narrow and acute, strongly sclerotized, twisted at apex.

Morphology (male and female):
Head and appendages (Figures 1-2, 4-5): Flagellum 14-segmented; scape cylindrical, ca. 1.75 X longer than wide; pedicel ovoid, ca. 1.2 X longer than wide; scape and pedicel similar in length; first flagellomere ovoid, constricted at base; first three to four flagellomeres as long as wide and partially fused in the male, ovoid and not fused in the female; flagellomeres length/width ratio gradually increasing toward tip of antenna, with last flagellomere longer than preceding; maxillary palpus 4-segmented; first palpomere more or less cylindrical, ca. 2.2 X longer than wide; other palpomeres ovoid, shorter than the first; compound yes widely separated dorsally, meeting at median line ventrally; rostrum (including labella) ca. 0.4 X the length of head capsule. Thorax (Figure 3): almost as long as high; pleural sclerites as figured. Leg (Figure 8): tibial spurs (1:2:2) ca. 0.66 X the width of distal part of tibia, covered with tiny hairs; tarsal claws simple, smooth. Wing ( Figure 6): h vein situated between the origin and the fork of M+Cu; Sc ending on C at the level of bifurcation of Rs and A 1 ; position of sc-r variable, more or less near the tip of Sc; r-r linking R 1 to R 2 faint or lacking; Rs almost straight, originating well proximally to the level of the tip of A 2 ; Rs three branched; R 2+3 ca. 0.46 X the length of R 3 ; R 2 running more or less  (Figures 7,  9, 10-12): posterior margin of tergite 9 produced into two small lobes; gonocoxite conical, gradually narrowed toward tip, bearing a ventromedial extension; gonostylus terminal; lobe of gonostylus ca. 3.25 X longer than wide, gradually narrowed toward tip; clasper of gonostylus ca. 5.6 X longer than wide, glabrous, bifid (largest and distalmost bifurcation serrated); aedeagus relatively long, reaching the level the gonostylus insertion; lateral process of aedeagal sheath long, narrow and acute, strongly sclerotized, twisted at apex; interbase blade-like, rounded at apex, bearing a stout lateral extension articulating with paramere, and a longer, more slender medial extension. Female terminalia ( Figure 13): tenth tergite ovoid, ca. 2 X longer than ninth tergite; hypogynial valve with a more or less ovoid and less sclerotized internal area ranging from its midlength to its apex; apex of hypogynial valve reaching midlength of cercus, bearing slender bristle-like filaments. Pilosity: antenna with verticils longer than individual flagellomeres; wing with macrotrichia all along longitudinal veins.
Remarks: The rounded structure indicated by Alexander (1952: 118, figure 7;1968: 24, figure 7) as the ninth tergite is actually the ninth sternite: the posterior margin of the ninth tergite is not rounded, but produced into two small lobes. The three dimensional structure of the clasper of gonostylus is relatively complex. Although some variation may occur in the relative lengths of its two apical extensions, in flattened slide mounted specimens (Figure 9), the apex of the clasper may be distorted in different ways, giving a false impression of variation. Such a distortion has probably driven Alexander's (1968: 23) description of the apical part of this structure as "expanded into a triangular blade". Sexual dimorphism is noticeable in structure of the antenna. In the male, the first three to four flagellomeres are partially fused (Figure 4), while in the female, they are more ovoid than in male and not fused ( Figure 5).
Distribution: As far as known, Chilelimnophila lyra has a restricted geographical distribution in Chile, ranging latitudinaly from ca. 37°S (northernmost limit at the Cordillera de Nahuelbuta) to 42°S (southernmost limit at Chiloé Island) within the Subantarctic Biogeographical Province in South America.