Peñaherrera-Leiva , 2005 new status , and clEpitoidEs new genus ( Coleoptera , Cerambycidae )

Bolivian Rhinotragini I: New species of Ecliptoides Tavakilian & Peñaherrera-Leiva, 2005 new status, and Clepitoides new genus (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae). The subgenus Ommata (Ecliptoides) is redefined and raised to generic status, Ecliptoides Tavakilian & PeñaherreraLeiva, 2005 stat. nov. with three new species: E. julietae, E. titoi and E. vargasi. A new genus, Clepitoides, is described with three new species: C. anae, C. gerardi and C. neei. The new species are illustrated, a key to the species and host-flower records provided.

According to Monné & Hovore (2006) the addition of this last subgenus brought the total subgenera of Ommata to ten.
The subgenus Ecliptoides clearly does not conform to White's description of Ommata, nor to the other eight subgenera of Ommata as outlined below.It is proposed, here, to raise the status of this subgenus to genus.Three new species from Bolivia are added to this genus.
A closely related genus, Clepitoides gen.nov., is described for three new species sharing a number of distinctive characters precluding their placement in Ecliptoides, or any subgenera of Ommata.

MATeRIAL ANd MeThOdS
The provision of males for each of the new species from Bolivia facilitates a reinterpretation of Ecliptoides, and justifies the establishment of Clepitoides gen.nov.
Information on the species of Ecliptoides from French Guiana was kindly supplied by Dr. Gérard Tavakilian.This material consists of 13 females of three species.The Bolivian material consists of three species, 20 males (known for all species) and 12 females (not known for two species).The Bolivian species do not entirely conform to the description of the subgenus Ecliptoides set down by Tavakilian & Peñaherrera-Leiva (2005); the most notable differences are to be found in males, which are sexually dichromatic.For these, and other reasons discussed below, the genus Ecliptoides is given new status and redefined.
The three new species of Clepitoides gen.nov.consist of 13 males and 3 females; both sexes are known for each species.Two of these species were captured on the same host-flower, and in the company of Ecliptoides julietae sp.nov.
The Bolivian material was collected whilst visiting flowers from three localities near Buena Vista, Department of Santa Cruz.These hilly localities lie in disturbed Tropical transition forest (Semideciduous Chiquitano Forest and Amazonian Humid Forest), 16 km east of the eastern Cordillera of the Andes.
Measurements were taken in milimeters (mm) as follows: total length = length from anterior border of gena to apex of abdomen; length of rostrum = genal length from apex of side to where it meets inferior lobe; length of inferior lobe from its most forward position on frons to its hind margin (in line with side of gena).Interocular distance of inferior lobes is measured at its narrowest point.References to antennal length in relation to body parts are made with head planar to dorsad and antenna straightened.Measurements are sometimes given as units, 1 unit = 0.28 mm.
One useful character, common among the Rhinotragini, is referred to as the humero-apical costa (dorsal costa of other authors).This costa, when present, and in its uninterrupted condition, can be described as the longitudinal convexity separating elytral disc from sides of elytra, running from the most elevated part of humerus (where it is broad) to apex of elytron (where it is narrow and usually elevated).In its interrupted condition it may be evanescent for middle third, or apical third, or only traceable for apical third.Amongst the species revised here, the costa is absent in one genus, present in the other.
The acronyms used in the text are as follows:

Taxonomy
The close relationship of Ecliptoides and Clepitoides is demonstrated by the many shared characters as follows: body elongate and slender; head almost entirely occupied by large, convex eyes, leaving rostrum and neck short; antennae slender, shorter than body, not passing elytral apex by more than one and a half segments, nor exceeding middle of urosternite III (usually slightly longer in males than females); antennomeres III-VI(VII) filiform, III or V the longest, (VI)VII-XI or VIII-X incrementally shorter, prolonged and slightly expanded at apex (subserrate), or uniformly thickened, to form weak club; prothorax cylindrical, pronotum with punctures contiguous and usually alveolate; procoxal cavity closed; prosternal process flat to moderately arched, with narrow base and triangular or trapezoidal apex; mesosternal process with narrow base, golf tee-shaped or somewhat ogivoid at apex; elytra distinctly narrowed behind humeri, dehiscent and short, falling between apex of urosternite I and base of III, apices variable (sometimes intraspecifically), transversely or obliquely truncate (always ascending towards suture), angles with or without spicules or small teeth; metasternum distinctly convex but not tumid; abdomen elongate, usually narrow and parallel-sided in male, fusiform in female; legs subequal in length (hind leg longest), peduncu-late-clavate; tibiae lacking brushes or specialised pubescence; metafemora not passing apex of abdomen; metatarsomere I longer than II + III.
Separation of Ecliptoides and Clepitoides from the genus Ommata has been discussed above.Separation of these two genera from the subgenera of Ommata is set out below.
Separation of these two genera from the subgenus Agaone Pascoe, 1859: body elongate, slender and delicate (in Agaone somewhat robust); prothorax elongate and cylindrical, with sides relatively parallelsided (in Agaone quadrate to slightly elongate, with sides regularly rounded); elytra short, not passing middle of urosternite III; narrowing to apex; and dehiscent (in Agaone elytra are long and cover abdomen, or almost so; relatively broad throughout; and not dehiscent); legs slender, femora not tumid (in Agaone relatively robust, femora may be tumid); metatarsomere 1 as long as II + III; (in Agaone much longer than II + III).
Separation of these two genera from the subgenus Chariergodes Zajciw, 1963: antennae not exceeding middle of urosternite III (in Chariergodes antennae passing apex of abdomen); elytra distinctly narrowed from behind humeri to apex; short, not passing middle of urosternite III; and dehiscent (in Chariergodes elytra weakly narrowed behind shoulders; covering abdomen; and not dehiscent); legs relatively subequal; apex of metafemora not passing apex of abdomen (in Chariergodes legs markedly unequal, hind legs very long; metafemora passing apex of abdomen at base of clave).
Separation of these two genera from the subgenus Chrysaethe Bates, 1873: elytra short, not passing middle of urosternite III; and dehiscent (in Chrysaethe elytra almost reach apex of abdomen; and not dehiscent); femora with relatively abrupt claves, and long, narrow peduncles (in Chrysaethe femoral claves more cylindrical and peduncles shorter and more robust); tegument semi-opaque or translucent yellow (in Chrysaethe tegument generally opaque, and always partly metallic).
Separation of these two genera from the subgenus Eclipta Bates, 1873 (a large subgenus needing complete revision to purge it of its many inconsistencies) does not include a number of species which may belong to either Ecliptoides, or to Clepitoides, as mentioned below: antennal segments may be thickened and subserrate (in Eclipta apical antennal segments may be serrate); elytra short, not passing middle of urosternite III; distinctly narrowed from behind humeri to apex; and dehiscent (in Eclipta most species with elytra reaching beyond middle of urosternite III, except a few species in which the abdomen is unusually long; in many species elytra are only moderately narrowed from behind humeri to apex; and, although the elytra of many of them gape, few could be said to be truly dehiscent); apex of hind femora not passing apex of abdomen; and metafemoral clave relatively abrupt (in Eclipta apex of hind femora may pass apex of abdomen; and metafemoral clave frequently cylindrical); integument predominantly translucent (in Eclipta tegument often opaque).
Separation of these two genera from the subgenus Ecliptophanes Melzer, 1934 (a diverse genus in need of radical revision): antennae shorter than body; and not clubbed (in Ecliptophanes antennae longer than body; and last two or three antennal segments usually strongly widened to form abrupt club); elytra short, not exceeding middle of urosternite III; and dehiscent (in Ecliptophanes elytra vary in length; may gape, but not dehiscent); metatibia without specialised pubescence (in Ecliptophanes metatibia often with apical brush).
Separation of these two genera from the subgenus Oxyommata Zajciw, 1970: antennae usually reaching middle of urosternite II or longer (in Oxyommata antennae just passing urosternite I); prothorax elongate and cylindrical, with sides relatively parallelsided (in Oxyommata prothorax quadrate and subglobose); elytra dehiscent from level of metacoxae; and apices truncate (in Oxyommata elytra dehiscent for apical third, well behind level of metacoxae; and apices broadly acuminate); metafemoral peduncle narrow and clave subabrupt (in Oxyommata metafemoral peduncle more robust and clave more cylindrical); tegument predominantly translucent (in Oxyommata tegument opaque).
Separation of these two genera from the subgenus Rhopalessa Bates, 1873: antennae short, not exceeding middle of urosternite III; and not clubbed (in Rhopalessa antennae always passing apex of abdomen; and widened at apex to form moderate club); elytra short, not exceeding middle of urosternite III; dehiscent; and apices truncate (in Rhopalessa elytra almost reaching apex of abdomen, or longer; not dehiscent; and apices rounded).
The colour distribution of the females in both Ecliptoides and Clepitoides, and males of Clepitoides, will also separate these two genera from all subgenera of Ommata; and is as follows: semi-opaque or translucent yellow to orange; pronotum with longitudinal, dusky, central fascia (for brevity, this candlestickshaped fascia, will be referred to as the candelabrum); margins of elytra rufous to black from, or near, humeri to apex.Among the known males of Ecliptoides the sides of pronotum are marked by a dusky, harp-shaped fascia in two species, the prothorax entirely blackish in the third, and elytra may be entirely yellowish.
That Ecliptoides and Clepitoides should be treated as separate genera seems justified by the following character differences: prothorax subquadrate or elongate; mesosternal declivity abrupt or inclined; elytra with or without secondary pubescence, humero-apical costa absent or present; male urosternite V undifferentiated or "winged" with deep central fovea; outer apex of protibia thickened or narrowed by excision.Sexual dichromatism present or absent.
Scrutiny of many original descriptions and photographs available on the Internet suggests the presence of further species of these genera.Some species of Odontocera Audinet-Serville ( 1833) and, at least, thirteen species of Ommata (Eclipta) Bates ( 1873) might be better placed in these genera at such time they become available for examination.
A number of secondary characters shared by the six Bolivian species make it possible to abridge the descriptions for Ecliptoides and Clepitoides.Male: rostrum (0.6-0.8 units); frons and genae closely punctured with sericeous pubescence; inferior lobes close together (see E. vargasi for mild exception), distance between them 8-12 times less than width of one lobe (except C. anae, 16 times less).Female: rostrum 0.9 units (except C. neei, 0.12 units) always longer than male's.Width of superior lobes 0.4 units; the distance between them two and a half to three times width of lobe, except male E. julietae twice width of relatively wide lobe (0.5 units), and female C. neei almost four times width of relatively narrow lobe (0.4 units).Antennae (measurements exclude C. neei female because of its large size): scape (0.42-0.48 mm) always shorter than antennomere III (0.45-0.70 mm), III always longer than IV (0.36-0.48 mm), usually longer than V (shorter E. julietae, equal E. vargasi); V (0.48-0.56 mm) always slightly longer than VI (0.42-0.50 mm); VII-X incrementally shorter, X (0.28-0.34 mm), X subequal or shorter than XI (0.31-0.36 mm); apical 4-5 segments lobate at apex, forming a subserrate, semi-loose club.Prosternal process always consists of narrow base and subtriangular apex, the latter broadly explanate at apex; mesosternal process wider at apex (truncate to slightly ogivoid, but the differences are too difficult to discern to be useful characters).Sterna usually hirsute with scattered patches of recumbent pubescence.Abdomen almost impunctate, sparsely hirsute with scattered shorter pubescence, sometimes denser on disc of urosternites IV and V, but not at sides.
Protibia always dusky on dorsad (reduced to apex in C. gerardi and C. neei); onychia chestnut to blackish, always as dark as, or darker than tarsomeres I-III.Structure: inferior lobe 1.7 x 1.2 units, interocular space (0.9 units) with 2-4 rows of dense punctures; antenna just reach apex of elytra, and apex of urosternite II.Elytral dehiscence stronger, apices of elytra transversely truncate and unarmed.Mentum with three carinas, submentum and gula smooth with large, sparse punctures.Mesosternal process straight.

Ecliptoides
Abdomen as male but more robust, and urosternite V regularly convex.
Variation: Apices of elytra of some males less oblique, and reaching basal 1/4 of urosternite III.Elytra of some females more strongly dehiscent and antennae somewhat thickened from antennomere III to apex.
In both sexes some reduction in size and shape of pronotal candelabrum, and extent of dusky pigmentation at sides of elytra.
Structure: Head.Inferior lobes very large (1.9 x 1.6 units) and convex, almost touching, together slightly wider than pronotum; underside moderately carinate with isolated punctures.Antennae long, just pass apex of elytra, and reach apex of urosternite II.
Thorax.Prothorax one and a half times longer than wide, front and hind borders subequal, sides subparallel with slight apical and stronger basal constrictions.Pronotum convex, sparsely hirsute; disc with alveolate, subcontiguous punctures; sides glabrous, mostly smooth with sparse punctures.Mesothorax with elytra reaching apical 1/4 of urosternite II; narrow, especially apical third; only densely punctured along sutural and lateral margins and at apical quarter; hirsute for basal half, otherwise glabrous; apex slightly oblique and slightly protracted laterally into blunt tooth.
Abdomen.Long and narrow, individual segments fusiform; length of I-III subequal, V slightly trapezoidal, with foliate sides and horseshoe-shaped depression.Apical tergite slightly rounded at apex.
Female slightly sexually dichromatic: General colouration as male except: head almost uniform yellow, black fascia between superior lobes reduced to small spots; candelabrum slightly narrower; sides of elytra black from base of epipleur, but humeri remaining mostly yellow; metatibia black for apical 2/3, otherwise legs same as male; antennal colouration less contrasting, antennomeres IX-XI uniform brown.Wings almost lacking dusky colour.
Etymology: This species has been named after Ana Peñaherrera-Leiva for her work on the Rhinotragini of French Guiana.General colour: translucent yellow and black to dusky.Head yellow with small, dusky fascia between superior lobes; rostrum paler yellow.Antenna: scape yellow with slightly darker apex; pedicel darker for apical half; antennomere III brown with base narrowly yellow; IV-V black with basal half yellow; VI-IX yellow with incrementally large chestnut apices; X and XI uniform chestnut.Pronotum yellow with moderately broad, almost parallel-sided, candelabrum.Scutellum black.Elytra yellow; sides from basal 1/6 moderately narrow black to apex; extreme apex uniform blackish.Entire underside yellow, except: hind edge of prothorax narrowly blackish at sides; triangular black fascia ocupying basal 1/6 of metepisternum; abdomen slightly more orange, visible tergites more so, and opaque.Legs, including coxae, almost entirely yellow, except: dorsad at apex of protibiae, extreme apex of mesofemoral club, apex of metafemoral club, apical half of meso-and metatibiae, blackish.Tarsi: protarsus entirely, and basal 3/4 of meso-and metatarsomere I yellow, rest of these tarsi blackish.Apex of wings almost entirely translucent, only dusky just before apex of anterior sector.
Structure: Head.Inferior lobes very large (1.9 x 1.6 units) and convex, together slightly wider than pronotum; underside with submentum finely but densely carinate and punctured, rest much more sparsely.Antennae moderately long, almost reaching apex of elytra, and reaching apex of urosternite II.Thorax.Prothorax one and a half times longer than wide; front and hind borders subequal; sides subparallel with slight basal constrictions, widest at middle.Pronotum convex, sparsely hirsute; disc with alveolate, subcontiguous punctures; sides almost glabrous, mostly smooth with isolated groups of punctures.Mesothorax with elytra reaching apical 1/4 of urosternite II; broad, regularly narrowed to apex; punctura-tion only moderately dense at sides and apex; hirsute for basal half, otherwise glabrous; apex transversely truncate, each angle with spicule.Abdomen.Long and narrow; individual segments fusiform; length of I-III subequal; V slightly trapezoidal, with foliate sides and horseshoe-shaped depression.Apical tergite slightly rounded at apex.
Female with reduced sexual dimorphism: General colour: distribution as in male.
Type material: Holotype male, BOLIVIA, Santa Cruz, 17°29'96"S/63°39'13"W, 420 m, Hotel Flora & Fauna, 5 km SSE Buena Vista, 20.IX.2007The key to the species of Ecliptoides and Clepitoides is largely based on differences of colour distribution, only creditable in these genera because intraspecific variation (sexual dichromatism excepted) appears to be minimal.This seems to be especially valid with respect to colour distribution on the legs.Other useful characters separating similar looking species are set out in the discussion following the description of each species.

Biology
According to Tavakilian, et al. (1997) the French Guiana material was bred from host-plants (Ormosia nobilis Tulasne), captured in Malaise trap, flying during the day, or coming to light (4 specimens).All the Bolivian specimens were netted whilst approaching, or feeding on, flowers of trees, creepers and vines.None of the Bolivian species came to light in spite of regular light trapping over six years, close to the flowering plants visited by them.
It is interesting to note that the data supplied with the many new species of Rhinotragini described by Tavakilian & Peñaherrera-Leiva frequently refers to their attraction to lights, whereas, our records of Bolivian Rhinotragini coming to light are rare.

Tavakilian & Peñaherrera-Leiva, 2005, stat. nov.
E. hovoreiTavakilian & Peñaherrera-Leiva, 2003,  and E. hovorei Tavakilian & Peñaherrera-Leiva, 2005  (from French Guiana).Males of E. julietae sp.nov.differ from other species by the blackish pronotum and sterna; the females from other Bolivian species by its entirely black humeri; and from E. hovorei of French Guiana by the elytral pubescence (fine and sparse in E. julietae Ommata (Ecliptoides)Tavakilian & Peñaherrera-Leiva,  2005: 37.Type-species: Ommata (Ecliptoides) roupertiTavakilian  & Peñaherrera-Leiva, 2005 (original designation).Description: Generally more semi-opaque than translucent.Antennomeres VIII-X slightly lobate at outer side of apex, sometimes uniformly thickened, with XI forming weak club.Prothorax quadrate or slightly elongate (ca.1.2 times longer than wide), pronotal punctures scabrous or alveolate.Mesosternal declivity abrupt ot relatively abrupt.Elytra without humeroapical costa; and may show decreased dehiscence; with short, semi-recumbent pubescence.Metasternum labrum.In both sexes of all species margins of elytra black, except in some males of E. julietae they may be entirely yellowish, and male of E. titoi partially black.Species included in this genus: E. julietae sp.nov., E. vargasi sp.nov., E. titoi sp.nov.(from Bolivia); and E. azadi Tavakilian & Peñaherrera-Leiva, 2003, Diagnosis: sp.nov., dense and silky in E. hovorei); from E. azadi by the colour of the scutellum (black in the French Guiana species, orange in the Bolivian); and from E. hovorei by the colour of metafemoral peduncle (apex black in the French Guiana species, entirely yellow in the Bolivian one).General colour: chestnut and orange to yellow.Head, prothorax, scutellum, meso-and metasternum blackish.Antenna: scape, pedicel, antennomeres III and IV, apical 3/4 of V and 2/3 of VI dark chestnut, apical half VII-X brown, XI brown.Elytra, including basal fifth and humeri, opaque orange; sides broadly dark brown from basal fifth to apex; extreme apex dark brown.Abdomen translucent orange-yellow, visible tergites opaque brown.Legs, including coxae, yellow, except: dorsad and apex of mesofemoral club, all of metafemoral club and tarsi chestnut; meso-and metatibia, except extreme base almost black.Apex of wings dusky.ed.Pronotum convex, slightly depressed at centre of basal half and narrowly to hind angles, this flattened area bounded laterally by two inconspicuous calli; apical half hirsute; disc with scabrous, subcontiguous punctures, sides mostly smooth with sparse punctures, almost entirely occupied by harp-shaped patch of dense, sericeous pubescence.Elytra not strongly recumbent pubescence on elytra; dense, silky and recumbent in the latter two species.From E. julietae sp.nov.and E. hovorei by the black, harp-shaped figure at sides of pronotum.Abdomen and apical tergites translucent.Legs, including coxae, orange-yellow, except: pro-and mesofemoral clubs chestnut on dorsad from apex to middle; mesotibiae chestnut for apical 2/3; metafemora black for apical third; metatibia black with narrow pale base; protarsus orange, meso-and metatarsi chestnut, all onychia chestnut.Wings dusky at apex.Species included in this genus: C. anae sp.nov., C. gerardi sp.nov.and C. neei sp.nov.Etymology: Clepitoides is an anagram of Ecliptoides.Diagnosis: both sexes of C. anae sp.nov.can be separated from C. gerardi sp.nov.by the entirely yelloworange underside, narrow elytra, and differences related to the length of the antennae, elytra and abdomen; in the latter the base of metepisternum is blackish and elytra broader; male antenna of C. anae sp.nov.just pass apex of elytra and reach apex of urosternite II, male antenna of C. gerardi sp.nov.fall short of elytral apex and reach middle of urosternite II; female antenna of C. anae sp.nov.reach middle of urosternite II, and elytra basal 1/3 of III, female antenna of C. gerardi sp.nov.reach base of urosternite II, and elytra apical 1/3 of II.Both sexes of C. anae sp.nov.can be separated from C. neei sp.nov.by their smaller size and broader candelabrum.The males by the relative length of antennae, C. anae sp.nov.reaching apex of urosternite II, C. neei sp.nov.middle of II; and underside entirely yellow in C. anae, sp.nov.metepisternum black at base in C. neei sp.nov.The females by the relative length of elytra, in C. anae sp.nov.reaching basal 1/3 of urosternite III, in C. neei sp.nov.apical 1/4 of II.
Holotype: male.Size 7.1 mm.Deposited at MNKM.Diagnosis: separation of C. gerardi sp.nov.from C. anae sp.nov. is discussed following the description of the latter.Clepitoides gerardi sp.nov.and males of C. neei sp.nov.can be immediately separated from all other species by the blackish triangle at the base of the metepisternum.Clepitoides gerardi sp.nov.can be separated from both sexes of C. neei sp.nov.by smaller size and broader candelabrum; and female of C. neei sp.nov.from all other species by its large size, and elongate, conical fifth urosternite.

Key to the species of Ecliptoides Tavakilian & Peñaherrera-Leiva, 2005, and Clepitoides gen. nov.
Diagnosis: separation of C. neei sp.nov.from C. gerardi sp.nov.and C. anae sp.nov. is discussed below the descriptions of these species.Female of C. neei sp.nov.from all other species by its large size, and elongate, conical urosternite V.