Immune response and biochemistry of calves immunized with rMSP 1 a ( Anaplasma marginale ) using carbon nanotubes as carrier molecules

Vaccination against Anaplasma marginale has been considered an important control strategy for bovine anaplasmosis. Recently, mice immunized with rMSP1a linked to carbon nanotubes (MWNT) showed significant immune responses, generating a new possibility for use of an inactivated vaccine. The objective of this study was to investigate the cellular and humoral responses in calves immunized with MWNT+rMSP1a, associated with inactivated vaccine of A. marginale produced in vitro, and evaluate the toxic effects of the MWNT on renal and hepatic function. rMSP1a was covalently linked to MWNT. Inactivated vaccine (AmUFMG2) was produced by cultivating A. marginale in IDE8 cells. Twenty-four Holstein calves were divided (four groups) and immunized subcutaneously with PBS and non-carboxylated MWNT (control, G1), AmUFMG2 (G2), MWNT+rMSP1a (G3), and AmUFMG2 with MWNT+rMSP1a (G4). Blood samples were collected for total leukocyte counts, biochemical profiling and evaluation of the cellular and humoral response. Immunization with MWNT+rMSP1a induced increase in the total number of leukocytes, NK cells, in the lymphocyte populations and higher levels of antibodies compared to calves immunized only with AmUFMG2. Furthermore, MWNT did not induce changes in the biochemical profile. These data indicate that MWNT+rMSP1a were able to induce the immune responses more efficiently than AmUFMG2 alone, without generating toxicity.


Introduction
Anaplasma marginale is an obligate intraerythrocytic rickettsia (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae) that affects cattle in tropical and subtropical regions, causing severe global economic losses (KOCAN et al., 2010).Various strategies have been attempted to develop a vaccine to reduce the impact of bovine anaplasmosis (AUBRY & GEALE, 2011).
Inoculation of blood containing a live and less virulent strain of A. centrale is the vaccine of choice in many parts of the world (KOCAN et al., 2003).Disadvantages include restricted use in young animals and the high risk of transmitting other blood-borne organisms (RODRÍGUEZ et al., 2000).Moreover, reported outbreaks indicated that this method confers only partial protection against virulent strains of A. marginale (BELL-SAKYI et al., 2015).
Inactivated vaccines from A. marginale were developed to protect adult bovines against clinical disease.However, they were withdrawn due to the difficulty in purifying rickettsia, maintenance of A. marginale-free calves for antigen production, the need for frequent booster applications and the production of isoantibodies in newborn calves of vaccinated dams (KOCAN et al., 2000;RODRÍGUEZ et al., 2000).Establishment of A. marginale growth in embryonic cells from the Ixodes scapularis tick (IDE8) was considered a promising alternative in the production of inactivated vaccine.However, this vaccine failed to fully protect adult cattle from clinical disease (GARCIA-GARCIA et al., 2004;LASMAR et al., 2012).One possible reason for the failure could be related to the absence of the Major Surface Protein 1a (MSP1a) expression in this system, due to down-regulation of the msp1a gene in A. marginale derived from cultured tick cells (GARCIA-GARCIA et al., 2004).Therefore, efforts towards the development of a new generation of vaccines are warranted to protect adult animals from the clinical disease.
Genomic sequencing and bioinformatics tools have provided a comprehensive set of surface proteins of A. marginale and therefore potential targets for vaccine development.Among them, MSP1a plays an important role in the infection by A. marginale, being associated with the adhesion capacity of rickettsia to the bovine erythrocytes and tick cells (GARCIA-GARCIA et al., 2004), and it has been shown to trigger a protective immune response (BROWN et al., 1998(BROWN et al., , 2001)).Recent studies using recombinant MSP1a (rMSP1a) in immunization trials of cattle and laboratory animal models demonstrated an induction of humoral and cellular immune responses associated with an upregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines (SANTOS et al., 2013;SILVESTRE et al., 2014), suggesting the possibility of its usage in immunization protocols.
Immunization experiments with recombinant proteins are complex due to the many variables that may influence the result, such as the particulate size of the antigen, a potential lack of immunogenic structure of the protein and the route/dose of challenge (NOH et al., 2013).Carrier systems are an alternative method to increase the efficiency of distribution and the presentation of the antigen to the immune system; among them, carbon nanotubes have been widely used as novel delivery agents for drugs, antigens and genes (FOLDVARI & BAGONLURI, 2008;BIANCO et al., 2011).Recently, we used multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWNT) as a carrier molecule for the rMSP1a from A. marginale strain UFMG2 and found that mice produced a significant humoral and cellular response (SILVESTRE et al., 2014).Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate the cellular and humoral responses elicited in calves immunized with rMSP1a, using MWNT as a carrier molecule, associated with the inactivated vaccine of A. marginale produced in vitro.In addition, the toxic effects of the vaccinations with MWNT were evaluated on renal and hepatic function.

Production of multi-walled carbon nanotubes functionalized to the rMSP1a (MWNT+rMSP1a)
The rMSP1a used in this study consists of the N-terminal repeat of the protein and belongs to the A. marginale strain UFMG2 (GenBank EU676175.1).Expression and purification steps of the rMSP1a were performed as described (SILVESTRE et al., 2014).

Inactivated vaccine of A. marginale produced in vitro (AmUFMG2)
The production of crude antigen was performed by cultivating A. marginale (UFMG2) in IDE8 cells (BASTOS et al., 2009).Initial bodies produced in vitro were purified (LASMAR et al., 2012); thereafter, the sample was sonicated (Ultrasonic Homogenizer 4710, Cole Parmer  ), and an aliquot was used for protein quantification (BRADFORD, 1976).The remaining sample was stored at -20 °C.
Throughout the experimental period, all calves were evaluated and monitored daily by clinical examination, including body temperature, heart and respiratory rates and potential adverse reactions in the site of the inoculation.Blood samples were collected in EDTA tubes on days 0 (pre immunization), 42 and 63 for evaluation of the cellular response and on days 0, 21, 42 and 63 for total leukocyte counts, biochemical profiling, and humoral response.Absence of infection by A. marginale was confirmed by nPCR (SILVEIRA et al., 2013).All experimental procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee on Animal Use of the Federal University of Minas Gerais (CEUA/UFMG, n° protocol 351/2013).

Evaluation of IgG, IgG1 and IgG2 antibodies levels
Evaluation of anti-rMSP1a and anti-A.marginale IgG, IgG1 and IgG2 antibodies was performed by ELISA, as described (SILVESTRE et al., 2014).The rMSP1a protein and the antigen of A. marginale UFMG2 produced in vitro used for immunization of calves were also utilized as antigens for the assay (0.1 µg/well -IgG or 0.5 µg/well -IgG1/IgG2).

Biochemical profile
Plasma and serum samples obtained on days 0 (pre immunization), 21, 42 and 63 were used to evaluate the renal and hepatic function of the calves to verify the impact of the immunization with carbon nanotubes on animal health.Serological biochemical parameters including glucose, creatinine, albumin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total protein, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) were evaluated using Cobas Mira Plus (Roche Diagnostic Systems  ) and diagnostic kits manufactured by Kovalent (Biosys  , Brazil), following the manufacturer's instructions.

Statistical analysis
Lilliefors test was used to determine the normality of the data.For analyses among groups at each time point, we used the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by Dunn's test.Friedman test was performed to assess the existence of differences between the time points in each group (SAMPAIO, 2010).Statistical analysis was performed using the software InfoStat  (version 2008), and median values were considered statistically significant at P-value < 0.05.For detection of potential outliers, the data were subjected to the Graphpad QuickCalcs Outlier Calculator (GraphPad Software, 2017).

Immunization of calves with MWNT+rMSP1a induced an increase in the cellular response
In order to evaluate the cellular response stimulated during and after the immunizations, blood samples were collected of the all experimental groups: G1-control group (immunized with PBS and non-carboxylated MWNTs), G2 (immunized only with AmUFMG2), G3 (only with MWNT+rMSP1a) and G4 (AmUFMG2 associated with MWNT+rMSP1a).Our data showed that calves from the control group (G1) presented no change in the total number of circulating leukocytes during the experiment (Figure 1).In contrast, on day 42, calves from the G4 showed significantly higher values of leucocytes compared to the G1, G2 and G3 groups (p<0.05).In the same period (day 42), calves from G2 showed a significant decrease in these cells compared to values obtained on day 21 in the same group.At day 63, the total leukocyte counts of the G2, G3 and G4 were considered statistically higher compared to the control group (G1) (p<0.05).Calves from the G2 and G3 were statistically higher when compared to the G4 group at day 63 (p<0.05).
No significant difference was observed in the number of circulating CD335 + cells (NK cells -Figure 2) in the G1 and G4 throughout the experiment (p>0.05).At day 42, calves from the G2 showed a significant decrease of these cells compared to values observed on day 0 (p<0.05).Animals immunized with MWNT+rMSP1a (G3) had a significant increase in the number of circulating CD335 + cells at day 63 compared to day 0 of the same experimental group, and this increase was considered significantly higher compared to all the other experimental groups (p<0.05)(Figure 2).
The kinetics of circulating lymphocyte populations after the different immunization protocols is illustrated in Figure 3. Similarly, the number of circulating CD4 + T cells in the G1 showed no significant differences among all of the evaluated days, while animals from the G2 showed a significant reduction after the second immunization (day 42), followed by a significant increase of these cells at day 63 (p<0.05)(Figure 3a).At day 42, calves from the G3 and G4, which received the MWNT+rMSP1a, showed statistically higher numbers of CD4 + T cells when compared to the G2 (p<0.05).After the third immunization (day 63), only the G3 group was considered higher than the control group (G1) (p<0.05)(Figure 3a).
Regarding of the circulating CD8 + T lymphocytes, calves from G1, G2 or G3 showed an increase of this marker at day 63 compared to day 0 for the same experimental group (p<0.05)(Figure 3b).Calves from G4 showed no significant variations throughout the experiment (p>0.05).To determine the existence of significant differences among the immunization protocols, the values obtained in each group were compared with each other at each point time.At day 63, calves from G3 showed a significant increase in the number of CD8 + T lymphocytes circulating compared with G1, G2 and G4 (p<0.05)(Figure 3b).
Animals from G2 and G3 showed a significant increase in the absolute number of B cells after the third immunization (day 63) compared to day 0 (p<0.05)(Figure 3c).In calves from G4, this increase was observed earlier, starting from the second immunization (day 42) (Figure 3c).On this day, the number of B cells circulating observed in the G4 group was statistically higher to calves from G1 and G2 (p<0.05).On the other hand, at day 63, the median values for G3 were statistically higher than G2 and G4 (p<0.05).
Only the animals that received MWNT+rMSP1a (G3) showed a significant increase of activated T lymphocytes (CD25 + ) between the second and third doses (days 42 and 63, respectively) (p<0.05)(Figure 3d).Furthermore, the increase of this marker observed in the calves from the G3 after the third dose (day 63) was considered significant when compared to the other groups (p<0.05).

MWNT+rMSP1a induced high levels of IgG, IgG1 and IgG2 antibodies
To evaluate the effect of different vaccination protocols on the levels of antibodies produced, plasma samples were used to detect IgG, IgG1 and IgG2 anti-rMSP1a and anti-A.marginale.As observed in Figure 4, the G1 did not produce antibodies against rMSP1a or the crude extract of A. marginale throughout the experiment.Moreover, calves that received only the rMSP1a (G3) did not respond to the antigen of inactivated vaccine (Figure 4d-f ), and animals that received only inactivated vaccine (G2) did not recognize the rMSP1a protein (Figure 4a-c).
Figure 4a shows the median absorbance values of IgG anti-rMSP1a obtained in each experimental time for each group.After the second and third immunizations (days 42 and 63, respectively), both G3 and G4 presented statistically higher levels of this antibody compared to animals from G1 and G2 (p<0.05).However, at day 63, the levels of IgG anti-rMSP1a found in G3 were statistically higher than those observed in calves from G4 (p<0.05).Furthermore, we observed that levels of IgG anti-rMSP1a in calves from G4 showed no increase between the second (day 42) and third immunization (day 63) as observed in G3 (Figure 4a).
Analyses of IgG1 anti-rMSP1a revealed that absorbance values were statistically higher in G3 compared to the control group as early as 21 days after the first immunization, while those in G4 showed an increase only after the second immunization (day 42) (p<0.05).No significant differences were detected between G3 and G4 regarding the levels of IgG1 anti-rMSP1a at all time points analysed (Figure 4b).
Regarding IgG2 anti-rMSP1a, calves from G3 and G4 showed statistically higher levels of this antibody from day 21 onwards compared to G1 (p<0.05)(Figure 4c).Expectedly, levels of IgG2 anti-rMSP1a in G3 were statistically higher than in G2 from the  first immunization onwards (day 21) (p<0.05).In contrast, calves from G4 were considered statistically superior to G2 only on day 42 of the experiment (p<0.05).No significant differences were detected regarding the levels of IgG2 anti-rMSP1a between G3 and G4 at all time points.
The median absorbance values of IgG anti-A.marginale obtained from each group are illustrated in Figure 4d.From day 21, calves from G4 showed significantly higher levels of this antibody than G1 and G3 (p<0.05).Group G2 showed significantly higher levels of IgG anti-A.marginale compared to G3 at day 21 and to G1 from day 42 (p<0.05).No significant differences were detected between G2 and G4 at all time points.
Analyses of IgG1 anti-A.marginale demonstrated a significant increase of this antibody from day 21 in G4 compared to animals from G1 and G3 (p<0.05)(Figure 4e).In G2, this significant increase was observed only from day 42 (p<0.05).Figure 4f shows that from day 21, calves from G2 and G4 presented levels of IgG2 anti-A.marginale that were significantly higher than G1 and G3 (p<0.05).No significant differences were detected regarding the levels of IgG1 and IgG2 anti-A.marginale between G2 and G4 at all time points (Figure 4e-f ).

MWNT did not induce changes in the biochemical profile of immunized calves
Throughout the experimental period, the calves showed no clinical changes, and no evidence of a reaction was observed at the vaccination sites.To evaluate whether the immunization of the calves with MWNT induced renal and hepatic disorders, plasma and serum samples obtained after the immunizations were used for biochemical profile analyses.Comparative analysis among the groups demonstrated that calves that received MWNT   Immunization of calves with rMSP1a of Anaplasma marginale (G1, G3 and G4) did not show a significant change in the biochemical profile compared with animals from G2 that did not receive MWNT (p>0.05)(Table 2).In comparison to the reference values established for cattle, all groups showed higher values of albumin, total protein and GGT at day 63, including calves from the G2 group (MWNT non-immunized) (Table 2).

Discussion
The development of vaccines is a powerful alternative to control A. marginale while reducing the use of pharmaceuticals and their residues in the human food chain (KOCAN et al., 2003).However, it is already known that antigen carrier systems have the ability to efficiently deliver small antigenic molecules (FOLDVARI & BAGONLURI, 2008), and in this study, we evaluated the cellular and humoral responses elicited in calves immunized with MWNT+rMSP1a associated with an inactivated vaccine of A. marginale produced in vitro, as well as the toxic effects of the MWNT in the renal and hepatic function of immunized calves.
Immunization with MWNT+rMSP1a induced changes in the total leukocyte counts, in the number of circulating CD335 + cells (NK cells) and lymphocyte populations after the third immunization.Number of circulating NK cells was higher in calves that received only MWNT+rMSP1a (G3) than in calves immunized with inactivated vaccine (G2).Although animals from G4 received the same amount of MWNT+rMSP1a, they also received the crude extract of A. marginale produced in vitro, which may have interfered in the production of NK cells, as observed in the animals from G2, through an unknown mechanism.NK cells are a component of the innate immune system and provide an initial defence against intracellular bacteria through IFN-γ production before the development of acquired immunity mediated by T lymphocytes (BOYSEN & STORSET, 2009).IFN-γ plays an important role in the control of A. marginale through the activation of macrophages, which eliminate rickettsia by phagocytosis and nitric oxide production (BROWN, 2012).Activation of NK cells is regulated by MHC I molecules, and infected erythrocytes with A. marginale do not express MHC.However, Chen et al. ( 2014)

Table 2.
Biochemical profile of the G1 (non-carboxylated MWNTs / Control group), G2 (AmUFMG2), G3 (MWNT+rMSP1a) and G4 (AmUFMG2 associated with MWNT+rMSP1a) groups.Values represent the median of each group.Statistical analysis among groups did not show significant change between calves immunized with MWNT (G1, G3 and G4) and calves from G2 group (MWNT non-immunized) (Kruskal-Wallis test, p>0.05).*Reference values bovine according to Kaneko et al. (2008); GGT values according to Bouda et al. (1980Bouda et al. ( ). v. 27, n. 2, apr.-june 2018 199/202 199 199/202 199 Immunization of calves with rMSP1a of Anaplasma marginale demonstrated that NK cells play a critical role in the control of the intraerythrocytic parasite Plasmodium falciparum in immune mice.Although the role of NK cells in the infection by A. marginale is not known, the results presented here indicate that immunization with MWNT+rMSP1a can elicit an increase in the NK cell population.

PARAMETERS
Calves immunized with MWNT+rMSP1a (G3 and G4) showed significantly increased percentage of the CD4 + T lymphocytes population in comparison to the animals immunized with inactivated vaccine alone (G2).Control of infection and induction of a protective response against A. marginale have been shown to require an increase in the population of CD4 + T cells.These cells secrete IFN-γ, which activates macrophages by inducing the cells to produce several antibacterial substances and stimulates the production of neutralizing antibodies by B cells, which are able to opsonize A. marginale and trigger phagocytosis of the pathogen by macrophages (BROWN, 2012).
Analysis of CD8 + T lymphocytes did not reveal statistically significant differences among the groups; however, animals receiving the MWNT+rMSP1a alone (G3) showed higher levels of this marker at day 63 in comparison to the other groups.Although the role of CD8 + T cells in infection by A. marginale is not known (WALKER & DUMLER, 2015), these cells feature a crucial function in the control and elimination of infection by other rickettsias (WALKER et al., 2001).
Immunization of calves with MWNT+rMSP1a also induced a significant increase in the number of B cells.After the second immunization, calves from G4 showed a higher number of B cells than calves from the control group (G1) and from calves that received inactivated vaccine (G2).In calves that received only MWNT+rMSP1a (G3), this increase was observed after the third immunization compared to G2 and G4.Elimination of different pathogens, such as A. marginale, requires the participation of several effector mechanisms, including activation of B cells and secretion of different isotypes of antibodies.IFN-γ secreted by A. marginale-stimulated CD4 + T cells is the main molecular propellant to induce B cells to undergo the heavy chain switching process, which promotes the production of IgG2 (ESTES et al., 1994;KOCAN et al., 2003).IgG2 produced during infection neutralizes the process of erythrocyte invasion or opsonizes rickettsia to be targeted to phagocytosis by macrophages (BROWN, 2012).Sequencing rMSP1a (UFMG2) used in the immunization of calves of the current study showed three linear B cell epitopes (SSSASGQQQ) (SILVESTRE et al., 2014), suggesting that MSP1a-UFMG2 may stimulate the activation of these cells and production of IgG2 antibody.
Expression of CD25 + marker by CD4 + T cells and their consequent activation is crucial for infection control by A. marginale (KOCAN et al., 2003).Between the second and third immunizations, calves that received only MWNT+rMSP1a (G3) showed an increase in the number of activated T lymphocytes (CD25 + ).Recently, we observed that mice immunized with MWNT+rMSP1a showed an efficient adaptive immune response through an increase in the lympho-proliferative response and high percentage of activated T lymphocytes (SILVESTRE et al., 2014).Taken together, these data suggest that rMSP1a functionalized with MWNT could efficiently stimulate the adaptive immune response in calves immunized with MWNT+rMSP1a.The efficiency in the use of carbon nanotubes as a carrier molecule of vaccine antigens has also been reported in previous studies, in which a significant cellular response and increase in the production of neutralizing antibodies was observed in animals immunized with the this nanoparticle (PANTAROTTO et al., 2003;YANDAR et al., 2008;ZEINALI et al., 2009).
Throughout the analyses, the G4 group showed a constant increase in all cell markers.Such data are in contrast to the significant reduction observed in the G2 group (which also received the inactivated vaccine), especially in relation to the total leukocyte count and the absolute number of CD4 + T cells.However, the increase observed in G4 was not as robust as in the G3 group, which only received MWTN+rMSP1a.These factors reinforce the presence of immunomodulatory antigens in the inactivated vaccine, which are capable of suppressing the development of the immune response (ABBOTT et al., 2005;TURSE et al., 2014).Calves from the G4 group received a high load of A. marginale inactivated antigens (400 µg/calves/dose) in addition to MWNT+rMSP1a, which may have contributed to the maintenance of total leukocyte, CD4 + , CD8 + , CD21 + and CD25 + levels observed between the second and third immunization of this group.This high dose of antigen may have favoured the activation of immunosuppressive mechanisms that, together with the presence of the immunomodulatory antigens in the inactivated vaccine, contributed to the lack of high levels of evaluated markers, as observed in the G3 group.Han et al. (2010) affirmed that the high antigen load observed during infection by A. marginale induced a dysfunction of T cells newly activated by immunization, which are characterized by the rapid deletion of A. marginale-specific cells.The association of the inactivated vaccine produced in vitro with MWNT+rMSP1a may have contributed to the lack of significant reduction in cell markers evaluated here.However, under the conditions used in the present study, this association was not sufficient to prevent the action of immunomodulatory mechanisms from the inactivated vaccine.
Because it is already known that the protective immunity against A. marginale requires the activation of a cell response and the involvement of neutralizing antibodies (BROWN, 2012), a humoral response was assessed in this study.Immunization of calves with MWNT+rMSP1a induced a strong antibody response of IgG, IgG1 and IgG2 anti-rMSP1a.Although both G3 and G4 received the same amount of rMSP1a during the immunizations, calves that received only MWNT+rMSP1a (G3) showed an IgG anti-rMSP1a response that was higher compared to animals from G4.Although G3 showed high levels of IgG1 and IgG2 anti-rMSP1a in calves from G4 at day 63, no significant difference was observed between the two groups.However, the maintenance of the levels of antibodies after the second and third doses observed in calves from the G4 group may have contributed to this reduction.In cattle, the production of IgG1 is IL-4-dependent, whereas IFN-γ induces the production of IgG2 (ESTES et al., 1994(ESTES et al., , 1995)).Although IFN-γ levels were not measured in this study, we observed that calves immunized with only MWNT+rMSP1a (G3) showed an increase in IgG2 anti-rMSP1a levels compared with calves receiving the inactivated vaccine.
The decrease in the production of IgG, IgG1 and IgG2 anti-rMSP1a observed in calves from G4 may be related to the presence of immunomodulatory antigens in the inactivated vaccine produced in vitro.This immunomodulation has been reported in previous studies, where A. marginale induced the evasion of innate and adaptive immune responses due to the high loading of antigens and the presence of immunomodulatory antigens (BROWN, 2012;TURSE et al., 2014).These results indicated that the immunization of calves with only MWNT+rMSP1a could induce a humoral response more efficiently than in association with the crude antigen of A. marginale.
Carbon nanotubes are promising nanomaterials with great potential in the field of nanomedicine; however, an investigation of their toxicity is needed to determine the potential danger of exposure to nanoparticles (BIANCO et al., 2011).Here, we evaluate the biochemical profile of calves immunized with MWNT to confirm potential renal and hepatic disorders.No significant change in the biochemical profile was observed in calves immunized with MWNT (G1, G3 and G4) compared with animals from the G2 group that did not receive MWNT, suggesting that the concentration of MWNT used in this study did not alter the analysed parameters.Changes observed in the albumin, total protein and GGT levels at day 63 were considered within the limit of normality.This may be associated with several factors, such as weaning and increase in the consumption of concentrated feed (CONTRERAS, 2000;MIRANDA, 2013), dehydration, age and the establishment of an effective ruminal microbiota due to adaptation to the new metabolic status of the calves (KURZ & WILLETT, 1991).These variations were not related with hepatic disorder symptoms (BOUDA et al., 1980;CONTRERAS, 2000).Thus, analysis of renal and hepatic function is one important parameter for the evaluation of the health of animals subjected to the subsequent vaccinations and can be used to evaluate the toxic effects of vaccinations, dosages and immunization periods (KANEKO et al., 2008).

Conclusions
The results presented here indicate that the immunization of calves with MWNT+rMSP1a could induce cellular and humoral responses more efficiently than AmUFMG2 alone, through an increase in total leukocyte counts, in the number of circulating NK cells and lymphocyte populations and in the expression of high levels of IgG, IgG1 and IgG2 antibodies.Furthermore, no significant change in the biochemical hepatic and renal profile was observed in calves immunized with MWNT, suggesting that MWNT did not induce toxicity.Although the group of animals immunized with MWNT+rMSP1a associated with AmUFMG2 showed an increase in cell markers, such an increase was not as significant compared to calves immunized with only MWNT+rMSP1a.Therefore, further studies should be performed to define the role of these immunological markers, stimulated by MWNT+rMSP1a, in infectious control and in the immunopathology of bovine anaplasmosis to identify the combination of antigens necessary to protect susceptible animals from clinical disease.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. (A) Lymphocytes were identified based on their size and granularity using flow cytometry.Analysis of CD335 + (NK cells) was performed within the selected lymphocyte region based on the relative fluorescence intensity observed in FL1 versus FL2 dot plot distributions (arrow); (B) Absolute number of CD335 + in whole-blood of calves at days 0 (pre-immunization), 42 and 63. (*) Represents statistically significant differences within each group compared to day 0, according to the Friedman test (p<0.05).Letters represent statistically significant differences among groups according to the Kruskal-Wallis test (p<0.05):(a) = represent statistically significant difference in relation to the control group -G1; (b) = statistically significant difference in relation to the G2 group -AmUFMG2; (c) = in relation to the G3 group -MWNT+rMSP1a; (d) = in relation to the G4 group -AmUFMG2 associated with MWNT+rMSP1a (n=6).

Table 1 .
Immunization protocol of the calves.