|
ISSN 1679-6225
printed version |
|
|
The manuscript must contain results of original research on marine and freshwater Neotropical fishes, in the areas of Biology, Ecology, Etology, Physiology, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Systematics. Scientific notes on morphological or chromatic aberrations, or new records of geographical distribution are not accepted. The Editor and Area Editors will perform a previous analysis of the submitted manuscript to analyze if its contents are appropriate to publish in Neotropical Ichthyology. The Journal is open for submissions to all researchers on Neotropical fish fauna. Payment of publishing costs may apply if none of the author is a member of the Brazilian Society of Ichthyology. Manuscripts that are not formatted according to instructions will not be accepted. |
Scope and policy |
Form and preparation of manuscripts
|
Manuscripts
Format
Text
Nomenclature
Figures
Literature Cited
Books: Thesis/Dissertations: Articles (list full periodic names): Articles in press: Internet resources |
Neotropical Ichthyology taxonomic contribution style sheet
|
This summary is intended to provide specific information for taxonomic manuscripts only. Generic accounts Order of presentation: Name Author, Year (or new genus [Do not abbreviate.]) Comments on above: Type species: For newly proposed genera, the original Name of the proposed type species, followed by Author and Year of publication (or new species) is sufficient. For previously proposed generic names, the following additional information is required (in this order): Nature of type designation (e. g., original designation, monotypy, absolute tautonymy. etc). If the type species was not designated in the original publication, the author, year and page of the designation should be cited (e. g., Type by subsequent designation by Jordan, 1919: 45). Diagnosis: diagnoses should NOT be written in telegraphic style (for clarity purposes). Generic diagnoses preferably should list the unique synapomorphies of the genus, followed by homoplastic derived characters and/or other useful distinguishing characteristics. Etymology: For new names, state the gender, even though it may be obvious from the construction. Do not give an etymology for preexisting names. If it is necessary to discuss the etymology of an old name (for example, to justify an interpretation of its gender), put that in the Remarks section. Species accounts Order of presentation: Name, Author, Year (or "new species" [Do not abbreviate.]) Some comments on the above listed categories: Types: Should be listed separately from other material examined only for new species. Should include full collection data, in the following order: Catalog number, # specimens (except for holotype), size range, number and size range of measured specimens, if different - in parentheses, locality, date of collection [in Day, Month (3 letter abbreviation only) and Year format], and collector(s) (e.g., LIRP 5640, 25, 38.5-90.3 mm SL (12, 75.0-90.3 mm SL), Brazil, São Paulo, Município de Marapoama, rio Tietê basin, ribeirão Cubatão at road between Marapoama and Elisiário, 21º11'35"S 49º07'22"W, 10 Feb 2003, A. L. A. Melo). Diagnosis: diagnoses should NOT be written in telegraphic style (for clarity purposes). Description: In telegraphic style (i. e., no verbs or articles) Coloration: In telegraphic style (i. e., no verbs or articles), may be divided in Color in alcohol and Color in life. Etymology: For new names, state the usage (adjective, noun, patronym, etc.), even though it may be obvious from the construction. Do not provide an etymology for preexisting names, unless the etymology is necessary to justify the spelling. In such cases, this information belongs in the Remarks and not as a separate heading. Material examined: Provide only locality, catalog number, number of specimens and size range. In addition, indicate any types by: (Holo- Syn-, etc.) type of Xus yus Author, date. For Lectotype or Neotype, also provide citation for source of designation (e.g., USNM 123456, 75 mm SL, Amazon River near Manaus, lectotype of Xus yus, Author, date, designated by Isbrücker (1971: 85) [or designated herein]). Specimen lots should be arranged by Country, then by State or Territory, then by river basin, if relevant. Country should be written in Bold font and should not be repeated after the first usage in a species account. Specific issues: Scientific names must always include the generic name, or at least an abbreviation for the generic name. This applies to tables and figure captions, as well as the text of the manuscript. Typically, the whole generic name should be spelled out in full at the first usage in each paragraph. Thereafter, an abbreviation can be used provided that there is no possibility of confusion with another generic name. Bilaterally paired structures must be treated in the singular (e. g., pelvic fin short, not pelvic fins short) Compound adjectives that include a noun should be connected by a hyphen (e. g., pectoral-fin spine, NOT pectoral fin spine). Fin-ray formulae should be reported with unbranched rays in lower case Roman numerals, spines in upper case Roman, and branched rays in Arabic numerals. Transitions between different types of rays should be indicated by a comma (,) and not a plus sign (+), or dash (-) (e. g, iii,7 or II,9. Not iii-7 or iii+7; no spaces should be inserted after the comma). We treat the catfish spinelet as a spine, so dorsal fin counts that include a spinelet should be reported as II,6 (or whatever the branched ray count is). Latitude and Longitude: No spaces between numerals and symbols. For degree sign, use Control +@, space (in MS Word) and not superscript O; for seconds, do not use the single quote mark twice, use the double quote mark (Shift quote). Percents: no space between numeral and % (e. g. 25%). Revisions and reviews Species accounts should be in alphabetical order. CONSIDERATIONS ON HOW TO PREPARE SPECIES DIAGNOSES A species diagnosis is typically a paragraph constructed of full sentences which list the most important traits that allow the reader to unequivocally identify the species. Ideally, the diagnosis includes one or more features that are unique to the species, preferably autapomorphic characters. If unique features were not discovered, the next best option is a differential diagnosis, within which a series of direct comparisons are made among species and the alternative character states specified by contrasts are stated explicitly (using "vs." followed by the condition found in the species, or group of species, being compared, for each diagnostic feature). Diagnoses that consist only of a combination of characters (i.e., traits listed sequentially which, when considered together, distinguish the species from congeners) in many cases fail to make a convincing case that the species warrants recognition, mostly because too little information is offered in the way of direct comparisons with congeners. For that reason, this form of diagnosis should be avoided. |
|
Steps followed during manuscript submission
|
1 - Manuscripts and additional documents are sent to the Scientific Editor. 2 - The Scientific Editor analyses the contents, format and enclosed documents. 3 - If the manuscript fills all requirements, the Scientific Editor forward all documents to the Editor of the area related to the manuscript. 4 - The Area Editor analyses the contents of the submitted manuscript. 5 - If its contents are considered appropriate to the journal, the Area Editor send the manuscript, along with an evaluation form, to two independent reviewers (Referees). 6 - The Referees make a critical analysis of the contents of the manuscript, making the necessary suggestions for their improvement, and giving their expert opinion regarding its acceptance or refuse for publication. 7 - The Area Editor receives referees review and evaluation of the manuscript.
8 - When receiving the manuscript with referees comments and editorial notes, author must make corrections immediately (maximum four weeks) and return to the area editor. If Author does not agree with referees suggestions, must justify its no adoption. 9 - The Area Editor receives the final version of the manuscript, check if necessary changes/improvements were made accordingly, and forward all documents (final version of the manuscript and illustrations) to the Scientific Editor. 10 - The Scientific Editor receives the documents, makes a final review of format and forward to printer. 11 - Proofs are reviewed by the Scientific Editor and forward to Author for review. |
|
[Home] [About the journal] [Editorial board] [Subscriptions]
All the content of the journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under
a Creative
Commons License
Departamento de Zoologia - IB
Universidade federal do Rio Grande do Sul
Av. Bento Gonçalves, 9500 - bloco IV - Prédio 43435
91501-970 - Porto Alegre, RS - Brasil
Tel.: 55-21-2568-8262