ISSN 0103-1104 printed version
ISSN 2358-2898 online version

INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS

Updated: 03/28/2019

 

SCOPE AND EDITORIAL POLICY

The journal ‘Saúde em Debate’ (Health in Debate), created in 1976, is published by Centro Brasileiro de Estudos de Saúde (Cebes) (Brazilian Center for Health Studies), that aims to disseminate studies, researches and reflections that contribute to the debate in the collective health field, especially those related to issues regarding policy, planning, management and assessment in health. The editors encourage contributions from different theoretical and methodological perspectives and from various scientific disciplines.

The journal is published on a quarterly basis; the Editors may decide on publishing special issues, which will follow the same submission and assessment process as the regular issues.

‘Saúde em Debate’ accepts unpublished and original works that bring relevant contribution to scientific knowledge in the health field.

Authors are entirely and exclusively responsible for the submitted manuscripts, which must not be simultaneously submitted to another journal, be it integrally or partially. It is Cebes’ policy to own the copyright of all articles published in the journal.

In case of approval and publication of the work in the journal, the copyrights referred to it will become property of the journal, which adopts the Creative Commons License CC-BY (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt) and the open access policy, so the texts are available for anyone to read, download, copy, print, share, reuse and distribute, with due citation of the source and authorship. In such cases, no permission is required from authors or publishers.

No fees are charged from the authors for the submission and evaluation of articles; nevertheless, once the article has been approved for publication, the authors are responsible for the language proofreading (obligatory) and the translation into English, based on a list of proofreaders and translators provided by the journal.

The journal has an Editorial Board that contributes to the definition of its editorial policy. Its members are part of the Editorial Committee and/or the database of referees in their specific areas.

Before being sent for peer review, articles submitted to the journal 'Saúde em Debate' undergo plagiarism-detecting softwares Plagiarisma and Copyspider. Thus, it is possible that the authors are questioned about information identified by the tool to guarantee the originality of the manuscripts, referencing all the sources of research used. Plagiarism is an unacceptable editorial behavior, so if its existence is proven, the authors involved will not be able to submit new articles to the journal.

NOTE: Cebes editorial production is a result of collective work and of institutional and individual support. Authors' contribution for the continuity of 'Saúde em Debate' journal as a democratic space for the dissemination of critical knowledge in the health field shall be made by means of association to Cebes. In order to become an associate, please access http://www.cebes.org.br.

 

Guidelines for the preparation and submission of articles

Articles should be submitted exclusively on the website: www.saudeemdebate.org.br. After registering, the author responsible for the submission will receive a login name and a password.

When submitting the article, all information required must be supplied with identical content as in the uploaded file.

Types of texts accepted for submission

  1. Original article: scientific research outcome that may be generalized or replicated. The text should comprise a maximum of 6,000 words.
  2. Essay: critical analysis on a specific theme relevant and of interest to Brazilian and international topical health policies. The text should comprise a maximum of 7,000 words.
  3. Systematic review or integrative review: critical review of literature on topical theme in health. Systematic review rigorously synthesises research related to an issue. Integrative review provides more comprehensive information on the subject. The text should comprise a maximum of 8,000 words.
  4. Opinion article: exclusively for authors invited by the Editorial Board. No abstract or summary are required. The text should comprise a maximum of 7,000 words.
  5. Case study: description of academic, assistential or extension experiences that bring significant contributions to the area. The text should comprise a maximum of 5,000 words.
  6. Critical review: review of books on subjects of interest to the field of public health policies, by decision of the Editorial Board. Texts should present an overview of the work, its theoretical framework and target audience. The text should comprise a maximum of 1,200 words. A high resolution cover should be sent through the journal's system.
  7. Document and testimony: works referring to themes of historical or topical interest, by decision of the Editorial Board.

Important: in all cases, the maximum number of words includes the body of the article and references. It does not include title, abstract, keywords, tables, charts, figures and graphs.

Text preparation and submission

The text may be written in Portuguese, Spanish or English. It should be typed in Microsoft® Word or compatible software, in doc or docx format, to be attached in the corresponding field of the submission form. It must not contain any information that makes it possible to identify the authors or institutions to which they are linked.

Type in size standard A4 (210X297mm); all four margins 2.5cm wide; font Times New Roman in 12pt size; line spacing 1.5.

The text must comprise:

Title: expressing clearly and briefly the contents of the text, in no more than 15 words. The title should be in bold font, using capital letters only for proper nouns. Texts written in Portuguese and Spanish should have the title in the original idiom and in English. The text in English should have the title in English and in Portuguese.

Abstract: in Portuguese and English or in Spanish and English, comprising no more than 200 words, clearly outlining the aims, the method used and the main conclusions of the work. It should not be structured, without topics (introduction, methods, results etc.); citations or abbreviations should not be used, except for internationally recognized abbreviations.

Keywords: at the end of the abstract, three to five keywords should be included, separated by period (only the first letter in capital), using terms from the structured vocabulary (DeCS) available at www.decs.bvs.br.

Clinical trial registration: 'Saúde em Debate' journal supports the policies for clinical trial registration of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), thus recognizing its importance to the registry and international dissemination of information on clinical trial. Thus, clinical researches should contain the identification number on one of the Clinical Trials registries validated by WHO and ICMJE, whose addresses are available at http://www.icmje.org. Whenever a trial registration number is available, authors should list it at the end of the abstract.

Ethics in research involving human beings: the publication of articles with results of research involving human beings is conditional on compliance with the ethical principles contained in the Declaração de Helsinki, of 1964, reformulated in 1975, 1983, 1989, 1996, 2000 and 2008, of the World Medical Association; besides complying with the specific legislations of the country in which the research was carried out, when existent. Articles with research involving human beings should make it clear, in the material and methods section, the compliance with ethical principles and send a declaration of responsibility in the act of submission.

The journal respects the authors' style and creativity regarding the text composition; nevertheless, the text must contemplate conventional elements, such as:

Introduction: with clear definition of the investigated problem and its rationale;

Material and methods: objectively described in a clear and objective way, allowing the reproductbility of the research. In case it involves human beings, the approval number of the Research Ethics Committee (CEP) must be registered;

Results and discussion: may be presented together or separately;

Conclusions or final considerations: depending on the type of research carried out;

References: only cited authors should be included in the text and follow the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals, of the ICMJE, used for the preparation of references (known as 'Vancouver Style'). For further clarification, we recommend consulting the Reference Normalization Manual (http://revista.saudeemdebate.org.br/public/manualvancouver.pdf) prepared by the Cebes editorial.

NOTES:

The journal does not use underlines and bold as an emphasis. Use single quotes to draw attention to expressions or titles of works. Examples: 'gateway'; 'Saúde em Debate'. Words in other languages should be written in italics, except for proper names.

Avoid using capital letters in the text, except for absolutely necessary ones.

Testimonials of subjects should be presented in italics and in double quotation marks in the body of the text (if less than three lines). If they have more than three lines, they should be written in italics, without quotes, highlighted in the text, with a 4 cm backspace, simple space and font 11.

Footnotes should not be used in the text. If absolutely necessary, footnotes should be indicated with sequential superscript numbers.

Repetition of data or information in the different parts of the text should be avoided.

Figures, graphs, charts and tables should be supplied in high resolution, in black-and-white or in gray scale, and on separate sheets, one on each sheet, following the order in which they appear in the work (they should be numbered and comprise title and source). Their position should be clearly indicated on the page where they are inserted. The quantity of figures, graphs, charts and tables should not exceed five per text. The file should be editable (not taken from other files) and, in the case of images (photographs, drawings, etc.), it must be in high resolution with at least 300 DPI.

In case there are photographs, subjects must not be identified, unless they authorize it, in writing, for the purpose of scientific dissemination.

Information about authors

The journal accepts a maximum of seven authors per article. Information should be included only in the submission form, containing: full name, abbreviated name for bibliographic citations, linked institutions with up to three hierarchies, ORCID ID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID) code and e-mail.

 

Assessment process

Every manuscript received by ‘Saúde em Debate’ is submitted to prior analysis. Works that are not in accordance to the journal publishing norms shall be returned to the authors for adequacy and new submission. Once the journal’s standards have been entirely met, manuscripts will be appraised by the Editorial Board, composed of the editor-in-chief and associate editors, for originality, scope, topicality, and compliance with the journal’s editorial policy. Articles recommended by the Board shall be forwarded for assessment to at least two reviewers, who will be indicated according to the theme of the work and to their expertise, and who will provide their approval, refusal, and/or make recommendations to the authors.

‘Saúde em Debate’ uses the double-blind review method, which means that the names of both the authors and the reviewers are concealed from one another during the entire assessment process. In case there is divergence between the reviewers, the article will be sent to a third reviewer. Likewise, the Editorial Board may also produce a third review. The reviewers’ responsibility is to recommend the acceptance, the refusal, or the reformulation of the works. In case there is a reformulation request, the authors shall return the revised work until the stipulated date. In case this does not happen, the work shall be excluded from the system.

The editorial Board has full authority to decide on the final acceptance of the work, as well as on the changes made.

No additions or changes will be accepted after the final approval of the work. In case the journal’s Editorial Board has any suggestions regarding changes on the structure or contents of the work, these shall be previously agreed upon with the authors by means of e-mail communication.

The typeset article proof will be sent by e-mail to the corresponding author; it must be carefully checked and returned until the stipulated date.

Complementary information (should be sent in a separate file)

a) Conflict of interest. The works submitted for publication must comprise information on the existence of any type of conflict of interest. Financial conflict of interest, for example, is related not only to the direct research funding, but also to employment link. In case there is no conflict, it will suffice to place on the title page the statement "I declare that there has been no conflict of interest regarding the conception of this work".

b) Contributors. Individual contributions of each author should be specified at the end of the text. According to the authorship criteria developed by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), authorship should be based on the following conditions: a) substantial contribution to the conception and the design of the work, or to the analysis and interpretation of data for the work; b) substantial contribution to drafting the work or critically revising the contents; and c) participation at the final approval of the version to be published.

c) Acknowledgements. (Optional).

MANDATORY DOCUMENTATION TO BE DIGITALIZED AND SENT THROUGH THE JOURNAL'S SYSTEM AT THE MOMENT OF THE ARTICLE REGISTER

1. Declaration of responsibility and assignment of copyright

All the authors and co-authors must fill in and sign the statements following the models available at: http://revista.saudeemdebate.org.br/public/declaration.docx.

2. Approval statement by the Research Ethics Committee (CEP)

In the case of researches involving human beings, carried out in Brazil, in compliance with Resolution 466, of 12th December 2012, from the National Health Council (CNS), the research approval statement of the Research Ethics Committee from the institution where the work has been carried out must be forwarded. In case the institution does not have a CEP, the document is-sued by the CEP where the research has been approved must be forwarded. Researches carried out in other countries: attach declaration indicating full compliance with the ethical principles and specific legislations.

MANDATORY DOCUMENTATION TO BE SENT AFTER APROVAL OF THE ARTICLE

1) Statement of spelling and grammar proofreading
Upon acceptance, articles must be proofread by a qualified professional to be chosen from a list provided by the journal. After proofreading, the article shall be returned together with a statement from the proofreader.

2) Statement of translation
The articles accepted may be translated into English on the authors’ responsibility. In this case, the translation shall be carried out by a qualified professional to be chosen from a list provided by the journal. The translated article shall be returned together with a statement from the translator.

Correspondence address

Avenida Brasil, 4.036, sala 802
CEP 21040-361 – Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brasil
Tel.: (21) 3882-9140/9140
Fax: (21) 2260-3782
E-mail: revista@saudeemdebate.org.br

 

[Home] [About the journal] [Editorial board] [Subscriptions]


Creative Commons License All the content of the journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License

Centro Brasileiro de Estudos de Saúde
Av. Brasil, 4036, sala 802 - Manguinhos
21040-361, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
Tel.: (21) 3882-9140
Fax: (21) 2260-3782


revista@saudeemdebate.org.br