Scielo RSS <![CDATA[Revista Brasileira de PolĂ­tica Internacional]]> http://www.scielo.br/rss.php?pid=0034-732920160001&lang=en vol. 59 num. 1 lang. en <![CDATA[SciELO Logo]]> http://www.scielo.br/img/en/fbpelogp.gif http://www.scielo.br <![CDATA[Wandering decarbonization: the BRIC countries as conservative climate powers]]> http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292016000100201&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en Abstract This article discusses the role of China, Russia, India and Brazil in the climate regime. It describes the trajectory of their emissions, of their domestic policies and of their international commitments, and argues that, despite their responsibility in causing the problem, they have been conservative forces in the climate regime. <![CDATA[Peripheral Realism Revisited]]> http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292016000100202&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en Abstract In this article we summarize the precepts of Peripheral Realism, its place in the intellectual history of International Relations Theory, its contributions to interpreting Latin American international politics and its insights for the future. After revising the intellectual merits and tenets of the theory in the four initial sections, we show how it predicted the behavior of Latin American states under unipolarity. Finally, we review its implications for a world where China may hold economic primacy. <![CDATA[The European Union and the Member States: two different perceptions of border]]> http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292016000100203&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en Abstract In this article we analyze two different perceptions of border inside Europe. On the one hand, we have the perception idealized by the European Union as an international organization, which believes that states benefit more from cooperation and dilution of borders in a common space than from keeping its borders as a symbol of its sovereignty. On the other hand, we have the European member states, taken individually, with particular interests and goals that, given the threat of illegal immigration, which is currently felt in the large-scale Europe, adopt a realistic perception of the border, and look at each territory as a space that needs protection from external threats. Following this argument, we reason that the current construction of walls in several European countries reflects the rebirth of a realistic perception of the border, and this is one more challenge for Europe regarding its unity and solidarity. Is this the end of the Schengen Agreement? What is going to happen to the European project if each state unilaterally adopts a strategy to deal with illegal immigration and refugees that are coming to Europe? Can immigration lead to a retrocession of the EU idealist significance of border? <![CDATA[What does the field of International Relations look like in South America?]]> http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292016000100204&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en Abstract This article provides a comprehensive picture of IR in South America by applying content analysis to 7,857 articles published in 35 journals from six South American countries from 2006 to 2014 in order to discover what the predominant theories, methods and research areas in this field are, how scholars tend to combine them in their research designs, and what the profiles of regional journals are, regarding their epistemological, methodological and subject preferences. The findings reveal a predominantly Positivist and largely Qualitative discipline, resembling North American and European IR.