Scielo RSS <![CDATA[Revista Brasileira de PolĂ­tica Internacional]]> http://www.scielo.br/rss.php?pid=0034-732920160002&lang=pt vol. 59 num. 2 lang. pt <![CDATA[SciELO Logo]]> http://www.scielo.br/img/en/fbpelogp.gif http://www.scielo.br <![CDATA[Many Worlds, Many Theories?]]> http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292016000200101&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=pt <![CDATA[Many Worlds, Many Theories, Many Rules: Formulating an Ethical System for the World to Come]]> http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292016000200201&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=pt Abstract There are many ways to speak about the modern world, and many theories setting it apart. I focus on a world facing economic decline and a return to the status-ordering of traditional societies. With republican theory as a backdrop, I show that an updated virtue ethics constitutes an ethical system uniquely suiting any society that is significantly status-ordered. <![CDATA[Rethinking IR from the Amazon]]> http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292016000200202&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=pt Abstract This article proposes Amazonia as a site to think world politics. The Amazon is invisible in the study International Relations (IR), yet its experiences are deeply global. I present the international dynamics at play in Amazonia at different historical moments to posit that this periphery has contributed to forging the political-economy of what is refer to as the core. The Amazon's absence from the study of IR speaks about the larger inequality in processes of knowledge production. Serious engagements with Amazonia are one way to invite a plurality of worlds in the production of theories, disrupting global divisions of labor in knowledge production ally. <![CDATA[Teaching IR to the Global South: Some Reflections and Insights]]> http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292016000200203&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=pt Abstract The complexities of global politics in the new century have rendered traditional approaches of IR obsolete in many ways. This article attempts to point out the inadequacies of Western/US centric perspective of IR in interpreting current developments. This article argues that the teaching of IR in the globalized age should take into account different contexts and encompass more alternative concepts. <![CDATA[International Relations Theory in Brazil: trends and challenges in teaching and research]]> http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292016000200204&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=pt Abstract This article presents a preliminary analysis of the teaching of International Relations Theory (IRT) and the use of theory in Brazilian academic research. We evaluate the teaching of IRT by analyzing courses' curricula and syllabi. Our analysis of the use of IRT in Brazilian research is based on Doctoral dissertations, CNPq-funded technical reports and papers published in Brazilian journals. <![CDATA[Resisting the denial of coevalness in International Relations: provincializing, perspectivism, border thinking]]> http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292016000200205&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=pt Abstract The notions of "international system" and "international society" must respond to the challenge of the encounter with the "rest of the world". "Colonial encounters" offer ways of exposing what we call, following Johannes Fabian, the "denial of coevalness" of alternative worlds and theories. We do so by turning to three different articulations of and responses to the colonial encounter. <![CDATA[Encountering the Pluriverse: Looking for Alternatives in Other Worlds]]> http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292016000200206&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=pt Abstract The lack of ontological pluralism in International Relations has been a strong determinant of the general scope of the discipline and its objects of study, as well as all that is rendered irrelevant to the study of the "international". IR has marginalized difference not only by disciplining epistemologies, but also by rejecting other ontologies, particularly those which belong to indigenous peoples, by relegating them to the realm of myths, legends and beliefs. The roots of ontological marginalization are deeply seeded, so much so that they are present in virtually every field of science (social or not). In order to understand this concern with ontology, we need to refer to the modern age, specifically its Western and now liberal manifestations. The main objective of this article is to put the ontological question on the table. It is argued that the "truth" of one-world, one reality and one universe is also a myth, showing how it has hidden many worlds and many realities. The concept of the pluriverse is used to show how - from different ontological positions, particularly relational cosmovisions like the Andean worldview -, alternatives actually appear. The text is divided into three parts: the first one depicts the pluriverse and what it implies and enables, the second describes how the pluriverse has been occulted by the myth of modernity, and the third part is an attempt to illustrate how relational ontologies contribute to the theoretical constitution of the global. <![CDATA[Towards the Global Study of International Relations]]> http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292016000200207&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=pt Abstract This article reviews recent critiques of the wester-centrism of mainstream International Relations. It argues that the overriding challenge is to try to move beyond critique and to develop a global study of international relations that insists on the importance of the systemic, of the global, but that also takes the critiques seriously and builds on them productively.