Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Erythrodiplax nataliae sp. nov., a new species for the state of Mato Grosso, Brazil

Abstract

Erythrodiplax nataliae sp. nov. (5 males), collected in Vereda wetlands (a unique Neotropical savanna environment) in Mato Grosso, Brazil is described and illustrated. The new species fits in Borror’s Juliana Group, and can be distinguished from other species by the combination of the following traits: blue pruinosity on thorax (more dense dorsally); sides of the pterothorax yellowish, darkening dorsally; face ivory, dorsally black with a metallic blue reflection; wings hyaline with a small basal brown spot; vesica spermalis with long lateral lobes, enclosing the median process and median process elongated with a pair of conspicuous rectangular and elongated lateral lobes, with a middle dorso-ventral furrow.

Key words
Odonata; Libellulidae; new species; Veredas; Palm swamps

INTRODUCTION

The genus Erythrodiplax Brauer is the most speciose libellulid genus in the New World, currently comprising 58 species distributed from southern Canada to 45° S in Patagonia (Garrison et al. 2006GARRISON RW, VON ELLENRIEDER N & LOUTON JA. 2006. Dragonfly Genera of the New World: An Illustrated and Annotated Key to the Anisoptera. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 368 p., del Palacio & Muzón 2019DEL PALACIO A & MUZÓN J. 2019. Redescription of Erythrodiplax chromoptera Borror 1942 with comments on the morphology of the vesica spermalis (Odonata: Libellulidae). Zool Anz 278: 90-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcz.2018.12.004.). Their species are inhabitants of different types of wetlands, and many of them can be abundant in temporary ponds, marshes and stream pools.

Since the last revision of this genus (Borror 1942BORROR DJ. 1942. A revision of the Libelluline genus Erythrodiplax (Odonata). Columbus: Ohio State University Graduate Studies, Contributions in Zoology and Entomology, 4, Biological Series.) eight new species has been described from the Caribbean (Jamaica and Cuba), Central America (Costa Rica) and South America (Venezuela and Brazil) (Borror 1957BORROR DJ. 1957. New Erythrodiplax from Venezuela (Odonata: Libellulidae). Acta Biol Venez 2: 31-42., Guillermo-Ferreira et al. 2016GUILLERMO-FERREIRA R, VILELA DS, DEL-CLARO K & BISPO P. 2016. Erythrodiplaxana sp. nov. (Odonata: Libellulidae) from Brazilian palms wamps. Zootaxa 4158: 292-300. DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4158.2.10., Haber et al. 2015HABER WA, WAGNER DL & DE LA ROSA C. 2015. A new species of Erythrodiplax breeding in bromeliads in Costa Rica (Odonata: Libellulidae). Zootaxa 3947: 386-396., Machado et al. 1995MACHADO ABM. 1995. Erythrodiplax leticia, sp. n. de libélula do nordeste brasileiro (Odonata, Libellulidae). Rev Bra Zool 12: 977-982., Dos Santos 1946DOS SANTOS ND. 1946. Contribuição ao conhecimento da fauna de Pirassununga, Estado de S. Paulo. III: Descrição de ”Erythrodiplax gomesi” n. sp. (Odonata: Libellulidae). Rev Brasil Biol 6: 33-37., 1956DOS SANTOS ND. 1956. Erythrodiplax luteofrons n. sp. (Odonata: Libellulidae). Bol Mus Nac Rio de Jan (Zool.) 141: 1-5., Needham et al. 2000NEEDHAM JG, WESTFALL MJ & MAY ML. 2000. Dragonflies of North America. Scientific Publishers, Gainesville, FL, USA, 940 p.). Borror (1942, 1957) proposed 13 species groups based mainly on the vesica spermalis morphology, including the monotypic Juliana, characterized bythe presence of big lateral lobes in the median process.

The aim of this work to describe a new species of Erythrodiplax belonging to the Juliana Group from the state of Mato Grosso, Brazil and to provide a modification of the specific key proposed by Borror (1942)BORROR DJ. 1942. A revision of the Libelluline genus Erythrodiplax (Odonata). Columbus: Ohio State University Graduate Studies, Contributions in Zoology and Entomology, 4, Biological Series..

The ZooBank Life Science Identifier (LSID) of this publication is: urn:lsid:zoobank.org

pub:C53D055B-182E-492E-888D-DA6C0290E849.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Type specimens are deposited in the following collections: Colección Entomológica Del Museo de La Plata (MLP), Coleção Zoobotânica James Alexander Ratte Laboratório de Entomologia de Nova Xavantina, Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso (CZNX) and Coleção de Zoologia of the Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi (MPEG).

All drawings were made with the aid of a Zeiss Discovery V20 stereomicroscope coupled to a digital camera Axio CAM ICc5 and the use of graphic design software and photo editor.

Photographs were taken with the aid of a digital camera setup on a stereomicroscope and the microphotographies were taken with the aid of a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) JEOL JSM-T100. Specimen preparation for microphotographies follows the method proposed by del Palacio et al. 2017DEL PALACIO A, SARMIENTO PL & MUZÓN J. 2017. A new method using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) for preparation of anisopterous odonates. Microsc Res and Tech 80(10): 1085-1088. DOI: 10.1002/jemt.22903.. Maps with distributional records were where prepared with the use of the free software Quantum Gis.

Vesica spermalis terminology follows Borror (1942)BORROR DJ. 1942. A revision of the Libelluline genus Erythrodiplax (Odonata). Columbus: Ohio State University Graduate Studies, Contributions in Zoology and Entomology, 4, Biological Series.. Wing terminology follows Riek & Kukalova-Peck (1984)RIEK EF & KUKALOVA-PECK J. 1984. A new interpretation of dragonfly wing venation based upon Early Upper Carboniferous fossils from Argentina (Insecta: Odonatoidea) and basic character states in pterygote wings. Can J Zool 62: 1150-1166.. Abbreviations: S1–10 = abdominal segments 1–10, FW = forewing,

HW = hind wing. Measurements are given in mm.

RESULTS

Erythrodiplax nataliae sp. nov. (Figure 1a)

Figure 1
a.Erythrodiplax nataliae (Barra do Garças, Nova Xantina): a lateral view; b. Head, anterior view.

ZooBank Life Science Identifier (LSID) -

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:3D6A4567-3409-415C-B296-86492F44DB83

Etymology. The specific epithet nataliae is in honor to Natalia G. Bareiro, the beloved wife of the first author.

Male holotype description (Figures 1-4)

Head. Ivory, except dorsal margin of the frons black with metallic blue reflections; labrum white; vertex basally ivory to black, metallic blue dorsally, without tubercles (Figure 1b).

Thorax. Prothorax light brown, wider at its base. Pterothorax yellowish, darkening dorsally; dorsally covered with dense pruinosity, turning to patches near the sutures (Figure 2a).

Figure 2
Erythrodiplax nataliae: a. Pterothorax lateral view; b. Femur III; cleft wings.

Legs. (Figure 2b). Coxae and trochanters brown; femora and tarsi light brown, with flexor margin black. Femur III with 12 spines, last spine two times as long as penultimate one.

Wings (Figure 2c). Hyaline, veins black, pterostigma light brown; FW with a proximal faint dark spot between C and R (in one specimen almost absent); HW with a small basal spot reaching basal half of median space. FW: 9 ½ antenodals; 10 post nodals; triangle 2-celled; subtriangle 3-celled; discoidal field starting with three rows of cells, finishing with 5; one bridge crossvein. HW: 8 antenodals; 9 postnodals; triangle free; CuP origin separated from anal angle of triangle.

Abdomen. S1-S2 light brown, S3 to S10 black witha dark brown lateral band (ventrally light brown). Without pruinosity. Cerci light brown, with 6-8denticles starting at distal half from the base (Figure 3a). Outer branch of hamules longer than inner, genital lobe rounded, strongly overlying posteriorly (Figure 3b).

Figure 3
Erythrodiplax nataliae: a. S10, lateral view; b. accessory genitalia, lateral view; c. Hammulus, dorsal view.

Vesica spermalis (Figures 3-4). Hood developed as two processes; apical tubercle absent but a semicircular membranous area can be observed in its position (although it doesn’t inflates); median lobe small, (Figures 5a, b); lateral lobes long, narrowing distally and enclosing the median process, meeting each other dorsally (Figures 4a, b). Median process elongated with a pair of conspicuous rectangular and elongated lateral lobes (“U” shaped in frontal view) and with a middle dorso-ventral furrow (Figure 3c). Whether they are in fact a pair of internal lobes it is uncertain (Figures 4a, b). The apical lobe has several rows of bristles; posterior lobe present but greatly reduced.

Figure 4
Erythrodiplax nataliae vesica spermalis SEM microphotographies: a lateral view; b frontal view; c fronto-lateral view; d fronto-lateral view of Erythrodiplax juliana. AL: Apical Lobe, FL: Flat Lobes of the MP, HP: Hood Process, LL: Lateral Lobe, ML: Median Lobe, MP: Median process.
Figure 5
Erythrodiplax nataliae, distribution map. ☆: Holotype locality; O: Paratypes localities.

Measurements. (n=1): total length (without cerci and head) 25.15; femur III 4.11; FW length 28.7; HW length 27.22; FW pterostigma length 3.11; HW pterostigma length 3.26.

Females remains unknown

Paratypes

Thorax. Pterothorax greenish with pruinosity covering most of the thorax.

Legs. Femora III with 12-16 spines.

Wings. FW: 9 ½ antenodals to 10 (only in 1 wing) or 10 ½; 8-10 postnodals; triangle 2-celled (only on one wing 3-celled); subtriangle 3-celled; discoidal field starting with 3 rows of cells, finishing with 5-8; one bridge crossvein. HW: 8-9 antenodals; 9-10 postnodals; triangle free; CuP origin at, slightly separated or distinctly separated from the anal angle of triangle.

Abdomen. Cerci with 6-9 denticles. Pruinosity from S1 up to S5-S6.

Measurements. (n=4) range in square brackets: total length (without cerci and head) 24.5 [23.04-25.40], femur III 3.89 [3.73-4.06], FW length 23.73 [22.04-24.53], HW length 23.73 [22.04-24.53], FW pterostigma length 3.21 [2.92-3.40], HW pterostigma length 3.30 [3.02-3.45].

Ecological data

The specimens were collected in the “Veredas” (Figure 5), one of the 11 phytophysiognomies found in the “Bioma Cerrado” of the “Planalto Central Brasileiro” (Ribeiro & Walter 2008RIBEIRO JF & WALTER BMT. 2008. As Principais Fitofisionomias do bioma Cerrado. In: Ribeiro JF, Almeida SP and Sano Sm (Eds), Cerrado: Ecologia e Flora (). Brasília: Embrapa, p. 153-212.). The “Veredas” are open and linear phytosomies that occur along narrow water courses with a substrate constituted primarily by hydromorphic clay, so the soil is limp and soaked (Boaventura 2007BOAVENTURA RS. 2007. Vereda berço das águas. Ecodinâmica. Brasil: Belo Horizonte, 264 p., Oliveira-Filho & Ratter 2002OLIVEIRA-FILHO AT & RATTER JA. 2002. Vegetation physiognomies and woody flora of the Cerrado biome. In: Oliveira PS and Marquis RJ (Eds). The cerrados of brazil: ecology and natural history of a neotropical savanna (1st ed.). New York: Columbia University Press, p. 91-120.). There were two types of vegetation, one with herbaceous-graminous species that occupies the largest area, consisting mainly of species of the families Cyperaceae, Eriocaulaceae and Poaceae, and the other arboreal-shrub in the central region adjacent to the water course dominated by palms such as buriti (Mauritia flexuosa L.) (Bastos & Ferreira 2010BASTOS LA & FERREIRA IM. 2010. Composições fitofisionômicas do Bioma Cerrado: Estudo sobre o subsistema de Vereda. Espaço Em Revista 12: 97-108., Carvalho 1991CARVALHO PGS. 1991. As veredas e sua importância no domínio dos Cerrados. Inf Agrop 15(168): 47-54.).

Specimens examined

COD: collection code from Coleção Zoobotânica James Alexander Ratte.

Holotype male: Fazenda Campo Belo, Nova Xavantina (14° 49’ 53.6” S - 52° 31’ 07.3” W), 21/01/15, COD 15151 [MPEG]. Paratypes (all males):one male, Fazenda da Abonizia, Nova Xavantina-MT(14° 45’ 52” S - 52° 33’ 02” W), 07/07/15, COD 15655 [CZNX]; one male, Fazenda Populina, Nova Xavantina (14° 49’ 03” S - 52° 34’ 35” W), 11/07/15, COD 15663 [CZNX]; one male, Fazenda Populina, Nova Xavantina (14° 49’ 03” S - 52° 34’ 35” W), 11/07/15, COD 15666 [MLP]; one male, Fazenda Novo horizonte I, Barra do Garças (15° 40’39.6” S, 52° 27’23.4”W), 15/07/15, COD 15742 [MLP].

Diagnosis

Erythrodiplax nataliae n. sp. fits in the Juliana Group proposed by Borror (1942)BORROR DJ. 1942. A revision of the Libelluline genus Erythrodiplax (Odonata). Columbus: Ohio State University Graduate Studies, Contributions in Zoology and Entomology, 4, Biological Series. because it shares its conspicuous elongated IV segment of the vesica spermalis, presence of lateral lobes at the median process, small posterior lobe and lack of an apical tubercle.

Erythrodiplax nataliae differs from E. juliana in the brownish, not uniformly colored body color pattern (uniformly black in E. juliana); anterior margin of the frons without a ridge (present in E. juliana) and by the shape of the lateral lobes of the vesica spermalis (short in E. juliana) as shown in Figures 4c-d.

This species color pattern resembles Erythrodiplax pallida and E. ana due to its bluish pruinosity alongside the thorax and the whitish frons. From E. pallida it can be distinguished by its frons entirely white (dorsally black in E. nataliae), femora mostly black or dark brown (flexor margin black, remainder yellowish in E. nataliae), cerci dark red (ivory in E. nataliae), HW with a medium sized basal spot (small or absent in E. nataliae), posterior lobe of the vesical spermalis with rows of setae (without setae in E. nataliae); from E. ana by its metallic blue vertex (ivory and dorsally black in E. nataliae), wing tips with a brown tinged (hyaline in E. nataliae); hammuli external arm bigger than inner (smaller or equal in E. nataliae).

The vesica spermalis shows many differences between both species and E. nataliae, such as the median process without lobes (with in E. nataliae), lateral lobes not meeting dorsally (as described before in E. nataliae), small to medium size posterior lobe (reduced in E. nataliae).

Modification of Borror’skey (1942) for the genus Erythrodiplax

Erythrodiplax nataliae run to couplet 26, this couplet was already amended by del Palacio & Muzón (2019)DEL PALACIO A & MUZÓN J. 2019. Redescription of Erythrodiplax chromoptera Borror 1942 with comments on the morphology of the vesica spermalis (Odonata: Libellulidae). Zool Anz 278: 90-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcz.2018.12.004. to include E. chromoptera, so a modification in order to include males of the species should be added to include E. nataliae:

26. Median process of the penis (=vesica spermalis) bilobed, the lobes extending ventrad (Figures 172-174); frons somewhat flattened, metallic blue to black, with a violet luster (Figure 358); hind wing 20.0-26.0 mm, basal spot never extends distad of Cu crossvein, or caudad of the apex of the membranule..................... Juliana Group

Juliana Group:

A. Lateral lobes of median process triangular on lateral view; body black (except for the cerci); frons black, with an anterior ridge..................... juliana

A’. Lateral lobes of median process rectangular on lateral view; body light brown with blue pruinosity, except for the cerci;frons whitish, without an anterior ridge.....................nataliae

26’. Median process of the penis, when erect, bilobed at apex of the median process, extending dorsally; frons not flattened, black and vertex biturbeculated; median process extending beyond apex of lateral lobes; wings with basal extending up to the 3rd antenodal and at least the triangle, with a distinct patter as shown in Figure 1b.....................chromoptera

26’’. Median process of penis not bilobed or if it is only in apically to the median process, frons variable in shape; basal spot variable, never as couplet 26’........................................................27

ACKNOWLEGMENTS

This study was supported by CNPq and the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas de la Argentina (CONICET). We thank the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - CNPq for providing research productivity grants to LJ (process 307597/2016-4) and to Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Mato Grosso (FAPEMAT) /CNPq for funding the Veredas-DCR project (process: 257421/2013), as well as CAPES/PROCAD for funding the project “Ecologia da Transição Cerrado-Floresta Amazônica” (process: 88881.068430/2014-01). We also thank the Laboratório de Entomologia de Nova Xavantina, especially Lourivaldo A. de Castro, for field support.

REFERENCES

  • BASTOS LA & FERREIRA IM. 2010. Composições fitofisionômicas do Bioma Cerrado: Estudo sobre o subsistema de Vereda. Espaço Em Revista 12: 97-108.
  • BOAVENTURA RS. 2007. Vereda berço das águas. Ecodinâmica. Brasil: Belo Horizonte, 264 p.
  • BORROR DJ. 1942. A revision of the Libelluline genus Erythrodiplax (Odonata). Columbus: Ohio State University Graduate Studies, Contributions in Zoology and Entomology, 4, Biological Series.
  • BORROR DJ. 1957. New Erythrodiplax from Venezuela (Odonata: Libellulidae). Acta Biol Venez 2: 31-42.
  • CARVALHO PGS. 1991. As veredas e sua importância no domínio dos Cerrados. Inf Agrop 15(168): 47-54.
  • DEL PALACIO A & MUZÓN J. 2019. Redescription of Erythrodiplax chromoptera Borror 1942 with comments on the morphology of the vesica spermalis (Odonata: Libellulidae). Zool Anz 278: 90-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcz.2018.12.004.
  • DEL PALACIO A, SARMIENTO PL & MUZÓN J. 2017. A new method using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) for preparation of anisopterous odonates. Microsc Res and Tech 80(10): 1085-1088. DOI: 10.1002/jemt.22903.
  • GARRISON RW, VON ELLENRIEDER N & LOUTON JA. 2006. Dragonfly Genera of the New World: An Illustrated and Annotated Key to the Anisoptera. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 368 p.
  • DOS SANTOS ND. 1946. Contribuição ao conhecimento da fauna de Pirassununga, Estado de S. Paulo. III: Descrição de ”Erythrodiplax gomesi” n. sp. (Odonata: Libellulidae). Rev Brasil Biol 6: 33-37.
  • DOS SANTOS ND. 1956. Erythrodiplax luteofrons n. sp. (Odonata: Libellulidae). Bol Mus Nac Rio de Jan (Zool.) 141: 1-5.
  • GUILLERMO-FERREIRA R, VILELA DS, DEL-CLARO K & BISPO P. 2016. Erythrodiplaxana sp. nov. (Odonata: Libellulidae) from Brazilian palms wamps. Zootaxa 4158: 292-300. DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4158.2.10.
  • HABER WA, WAGNER DL & DE LA ROSA C. 2015. A new species of Erythrodiplax breeding in bromeliads in Costa Rica (Odonata: Libellulidae). Zootaxa 3947: 386-396.
  • MACHADO ABM. 1995. Erythrodiplax leticia, sp. n. de libélula do nordeste brasileiro (Odonata, Libellulidae). Rev Bra Zool 12: 977-982.
  • NEEDHAM JG, WESTFALL MJ & MAY ML. 2000. Dragonflies of North America. Scientific Publishers, Gainesville, FL, USA, 940 p.
  • OLIVEIRA-FILHO AT & RATTER JA. 2002. Vegetation physiognomies and woody flora of the Cerrado biome. In: Oliveira PS and Marquis RJ (Eds). The cerrados of brazil: ecology and natural history of a neotropical savanna (1st ed.). New York: Columbia University Press, p. 91-120.
  • RIBEIRO JF & WALTER BMT. 2008. As Principais Fitofisionomias do bioma Cerrado. In: Ribeiro JF, Almeida SP and Sano Sm (Eds), Cerrado: Ecologia e Flora (). Brasília: Embrapa, p. 153-212.
  • RIEK EF & KUKALOVA-PECK J. 1984. A new interpretation of dragonfly wing venation based upon Early Upper Carboniferous fossils from Argentina (Insecta: Odonatoidea) and basic character states in pterygote wings. Can J Zool 62: 1150-1166.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    19 Oct 2020
  • Date of issue
    2020

History

  • Received
    1 Nov 2018
  • Accepted
    31 Jan 2019
Academia Brasileira de Ciências Rua Anfilófio de Carvalho, 29, 3º andar, 20030-060 Rio de Janeiro RJ Brasil, Tel: +55 21 3907-8100 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil
E-mail: aabc@abc.org.br