Garantia literária: elementos para uma revisão crítica após um século

Literary warrant: elements for a critical review after one century

Resumos

Considerando o princípio da garantia literária, formulado por Hulme em 1911, para quem os termos de um sistema de classificação devem derivar antes da literatura a ser efetivamente classificada (o que se encontra documentado) do que de considerações puramente teóricas (classificações científicas ou filosóficas ou em uma suposta autoridade dos primeiros classificacionistas), observa-se uma ruptura com as concepções de Harris e de Dewey que, por sua vez, haviam se baseado em Bacon e Leibnitz. Deste modo, busca-se contribuir para uma síntese crítica do referido princípio como subsídio teórico aos estudos de organização do conhecimento. Para tanto, estuda-se a vigência deste princípio ao longo de um século por meio de distintos dados documentais (registro em dicionários, recuperação no Google etc.), reconhecendo-o enquanto elemento metodológico em sistemas de classificação e em padrões de registro. Nesse âmbito discutem-se os procedimentos top-down ou bottom-up de desenho de sistemas e se resenham três aplicações tradicionais da garantia literária, sugerindo-se três novas aplicações, em virtude de seu potencial metodológico. Tais aspectos levam a concluir pela crescente perspectiva de aplicação da garantia literária dentro e fora do campo da Ciência da Informação.

Garantia literária; Sistemas de organização do conhecimento; Vocabulário controlado

This study contributes to a critical synthesis of the principle of literary warrant, initially formulated by Hulme in 1911. Hulme proposed that the terms of a classification system should be derived from the literature to be classified, rather than based on purely theoretical considerations. Founding literary warrant on literature which is actually documented rather than on scientific or philosophical classifications or on the supposed authority of the first classificationists implied a clear departure from the conceptions of Harris and Dewey, who had used the classifications of Bacon and Leibniz as models. The validity of this principle over the past century is studied by means of diverse documental data (entries in dictionaries, retrieval by Google, etc.), as it is recognized as a main methodological element for classification standards and systems. This study also discusses the situation with respect to the top-down or bottom-up methodologies of system design. Three traditional applications of literary warrant are described as well as three new applications are suggested, in light of its methodological potential. It is possible to conclude that this principle will find increasing applications in other contexts, within and beyond Information Science.

Literary warrant; Knowledge organization systems; Controlled vocabularie

• BALPÍZAR, R. ¿Cómo hacer un diccionario científico-técnico? Buenos Aires: Memphis, 1997.
• AMERICAN Library Association. Glosario ALA de Bibliotecología y Ciencias de la Información Madrid: Díaz de Santos, 1988.
• BARITÉ, M. La garantia literaria: revisión crítica y propuesta teórico- metodológica. 2009. 255f. Dissertação (Mestrado) - Universidad de Granada, España, 2009.
• BARITÉ, M. La gestión de la terminología de áreas interdisciplinarias en unidades de información especializadas. In: ENCUENTRO DE EDIBCIC, 7., 2006, Marília. Marília: UNESP, 2006. 1 CD-Rom.
• BEALL, J. Approaches to expansions: case studies from the German and Vietnamese translations. In: WORLD LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CONGRESS: IFLA GENERAL CONFERENCE AND COUNCIL, 69th, 2003, Berlin. Proceedings... 2003. Available from: <http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla69/papers/123e-Beall.pdf>. Cited: 20 Mar. 2010.
• BEGHTOL, C. Semantic validity: concepts of warrant in bibliographic classification systems. Library Resources & Technical Services, v.30, n.2, p.109-123, 1986.
• BEGHTOL, C. Domain analysis, literary warrant and consensus: the case of fiction studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v.46, n.1, p.30-44, 1995.
• BINGI, R.; KHAZANCHI, D.; YADAV, S. A framework for the comparative analysis and evaluation of knowledge representation schemes. Information Processing & Management, v.31, n.2, p.233-247, 1995.
• BROUGHTON, V. Facet analytical theory as a basis for knowledge organization tools in a subject portal. In: INTERNATIONAL ISKO CONFERENCE, 7th, 10-13 July 2002, Granada, Spain. Proceedings... Wurzburg: Ergon, 2002. p.135-141.
• BUONOCORE, D. Diccionario de Bibliotecología 2. ed. Buenos Aires: Marymar, 1976.
• CABRÉ, M. T. La terminología: teoría, metodología, aplicaciones. Barcelona: Antártida, 1993.
• for the construction industry. 1997. Available from: <http://www.icis.org/siteadmin/rtdocs/images/5.pdf>. Cited: 20 Mar. 2010.
• CENTELLES, M. Taxonomías para la categorización y la organización de la información en sitios web. Hipertext.net, n.3, mayo 2005. Disponible en: <http://www.hipertext.net/web/pag254.htm>. Acceso: 20 Mar. 2010.
• CHAN, L.M., RICHMOND, P.; SVENONIUS, E. (Ed.) Theory of subject analysis Littleton, Co.: Libraries Unlimited, 1985.
• CLASON, W.E. Elsevier's dictionary of Library Science, Information and Documentation Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1973.
• centennial. Urbana - Champaign (IL): University of Illions, 1976. p.32-48.
• DEWEY Decimal Classification and Relative Index. 22^nd ed. Dublin: Fores Press, 2003. 4v.
• DEWEY, M. Sistema de clasificación decimal: tablas e índice New York: Forest Press, 1955.
• DRAKE, M., (Ed.). Encyclopedia of library and information science 2^nd ed. New York: CRC Press, 2003.
• FARRADANE, J.E.L. A scientific theory of classification and indexing. Journal of Documentation, v.6, p.83-99, 1950.
• FARRADANE, J.E.L. Fundamental fallacies and new needs in Classification (1961). In: CHAN, L.M., RICHMOND, P.; SVENONIUS, E. (Ed.). Theory of subject analysis Littleton, Co.: Libraries Unlimited, 1985. p.199-209.
• FOSKETT, A.C. The subject approach to information 5^th edition. London: Library Association, 1996.
• GARDIN, J.C. et al. L'automatisation des recherches documentaires: un modèle général "Le SYNTOL". 2^nd ed. Revue et augmentée. Paris: Gauthier-Villars, 1968.
• v.12, n.1, p.63-81, 2006.
• GOOD, B.M.; TENNIS, J.T. Term based comparison metrics for controlled and uncontrolled indexing languages. Information Research, v.14, n.1, 2009. Available from: <http://informationr.net/ir/14-1/paper395.html>. Cited: 20 Mar. 2010.
• GUIMARAES, J.A.C. Perspectivas de ensino em organização do conhecimento em cursos de Biblioteconomia: uma reflexão. In: CARRARA, K. (Org.). Educação, universidade e pesquisa Marília: UNESP, 2001. p.61-72.
• HERRING, S.C. A faceted classification scheme for computermediated discourse. Language@Internet, 4, article 1, 2007. Available from: <http://www.languageatinternet.de/articles/2007/761/index_html>. Cited: 20 Mar. 2010.
• HJØRLAND, B. Domain analysis in Information Science : eleven approaches: traditional as well as innovative. Journal of Documentation, v.58, n.4, p.422-461, 2002.
• HJØRLAND, B. Core concepts in Library and Information Science (LIS). 2005. Available from: <http://www.db.dk/bh/core%20concepts%20in%20lis/home.htm>. Cited: 20 Mar. 2010.
• 2007. CONGRÈS DE L'ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES SCIENCES DE L'INFORMATION. Montréal: CAIS/ACSI, 2007. Available from: <http://www.cais-acsi.ca>. Cited: 20 Mar. 2010.
• HULME, E.W. Principles of book classification: chapter III - on the definition of class headings, and the natural limit to the extension of book classification. Library Association Record, n.13, p. 444-449, 1911.
• HULME, E.W. Principles of book classification. Library Association Record, n.13-14, 1911-1912.
• HULME, E. W. Principles of book classification London: Association of Assistant Librarians, 1950.
• Association of Assistant Librarians, 1950).
• INTERNATIONAL Organization for Standarization. Norme internationale ISO 704: principes et méthodes de la terminologie. Ginebra: ISO, 1987.
• IYER, H. Classificatory structures: concepts, relations and representation. Frankfurt: INDEKS, 1995.
• KEENAN, S. Concise dictionary of library and information science London: Bowker-Saur, 1996.
• LANCASTER, F.W. Vocabulary control in information retrieval systems. In: VOIGHT, M.J.; HARRIS, M, (Ed.). Advances in librarianship New York: Academic Press, 1977. v.7, p.1-40.
• LANGRIDGE, D. Classificaçao: abordagem para estudantes de biblioteconomia. Rio de Janeiro: Interciencia, 1977.
• LIBRARY of Congress. Library of congress subject headings Washington: Government Printing Office, 2009. 5 v. + Supplement.
• MAI, J.-E. Classification in context: relativity, reality and representation. Knowledge Organization, v.31, n.1, p.39-48, 2004.
• McILLWAINE, I.C. Curso de atualizaçao sobre a CDU. In: SIMPÓSIO ESTADO ATUAL E PERSPECTIVAS DA CDU. Brasilia: IBICT, 1996. p.99-150.
• McILLWAINE, I.C. The Universal decimal classification: some factors concerning its origins, development and influence. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v.48, n.4, p.331-339, 1997.
• MIKSA, F. The DDC, the universe of knowledge, and the postmodern library Dublin: OCLC Forest Press, 1998.
• MILLS, J. Faceted classification and logical division in information retrieval. Library Trends, v.52, n.3, p.541-570, 2004.
• MIWA, M.; KANDO, N. A naïve ontology for concepts of time and space for searching and learning. Information Research, v.11, n.2, 2007. Available from: <http://informationr.net/ir/12-2/paper296.html>. Cited: 20 Mar. 2010.
• MOCHÓN, G.; SORLI, A. Tesauro de biblioteconomía y documentación Madrid: CSIC, CINDOC, 2003. Disponible en: <http://thes.cindoc.csic.es/index_BIBLIO_esp.html>. Acceso: 20 Mar. 2010.
• NATIONAL INFORMATION STANDARDS ORGANIZATION. Guidelines for the construction, format and management of monolingual controlled vocabularies: an American National Estandar developed by the National Information Standards Organization. Bethesda: NISO Press, 2005.
• NAUMIS, C. et al. Tesauro latinoamericano en ciencia bibliotecológica y de la Información México: UNAM, 1999.
• OLDING, R.K. Wyndham Hulme's literary warrant & information indication Los Angeles: University of California, 1968. 23p.
• PENICHE DE SÁNCHEZ MAcGREGOR, S. Vocabulario controlado en bibliotecología, ciencia de la información y temas afines México: UNAM, 1992.
• POMBO, O. Da classificação dos seres à classificação dos saberes. Leituras: Revista da Biblioteca Nacional de Lisboa, n.2, p.19-33, primavera 1998. Disponível em: <http://www.educ.fc.ul.pt/docentes/opombo/investigacao/opombo-classificacao.pdf>. Acesso em: 20 mar. 2010.
• PRIETO-DÍAZ, R. A faceted approach to building ontologies 2002. Available from: <https://users.cs.jmu.edu/prietorx/Public/publications/BulidOntologiesRPD-ER2002.doc>. Cited: 20 Mar. 2010.
• PRYTHERCH, R. comp. Harrod's Librarian's Glossary of terms: used in Librarianship, documentation and the book crafts: an reference books. 7th ed. Worcester, UK: Gower, 1990.
• QUINTARELLI, E. Folksonomies: power to the people. Paper presented at the ISKO Italy UNI-MIB meeting, Milano 24 june 2005. Available from: <http://www.iskoi.org/doc/folksonomies.htm>. Cited: 20 Mar. 2010.
• RAFFERTY, P. The representation of knowledge in library classification schemes. Knowledge Organization, v.28, n.4, p.180-191, 2001.
• RANGANATHAN, S.R. Prolegomena to library classification 3^th ed. Bombay: Asia Publications, 1967. Available from: <http://dlist.sir.arizona.edu/1151>. Cited: 20 Mar. 2010.
• REITZ, J. M. Dictionary for Library and Information Science Libraries Unlimited, 2003.
• RODRÍGUEZ, R.D. Hulme's concept of literary warrant. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, v.5, n.1, p.17-26, 1984.
• RODRÍGUEZ BRAVO, B et al. Tesauro de ciencias de la documentación 2004. Disponible: <http://www3.unileon.es/dp/abd/tesauro/pagina/tesdocumentacion/docutes.htm>. Acceso: 20 Mar. 2010.
• SISTEMA de Clasificación decimal: diseñado originalmente por Melvil Dewey. Santa Fe de Bogotá: Rojas Eberhard, 1995. 4v.
• SISTEMA de Clasificación decimal de Dewey e índice relativo Bogotá: Rojas Eberhard Editores, 2000. 4v.
• SPINAK, E. Diccionario enciclopédico de bibliometría, cienciometría e informetría París: Unesco, 1996.
• SZOSTAK, R. Classification, interdisciplinarity and the study of science. Journal of Documentation, v.64, n.3, p.319-332, 2008.
• TÁLAMO, M.F.G.M. Linguagem documentária São Paulo: APB, 1997.
• VAVER, A.T. Subject access in an interdisciplinary environment. College and Research Libraries News, v.63, n.6, p.415-416, 2002.
• WERSIG, G.; NEVELING, U. Terminology of documentation: terminología de la documentación. París: Unesco, 1976.
• WILLIAMSON, N. An interdisciplinary world and discipline based classification. In: El-HADI, W.M. (Ed.). Structures and relations in knowledge organization Würzburg: Ergon-Verlang, 1998. p.116-123.
• XIAO, Y. Faceted classification: a consideration of its features as a paradigm of knowledge organization. Knowledge Organization, v.21, n.2, p.64-68, 1994.
• YANG, K. et al. Organizing the web: semi-automatic construction of a faceted scheme. In: IADIS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE WWW/INTERNET, 2004, Madrid, Spain. Proceedings... IADIS, 2008. p. 374-381. Available from: <http://ivl.slis.indiana.edu/km/pub/2004-yang-orgweb.pdf>. Cited: 20 Mar. 2010.
• YEE, M.M. Two Genre and Form Lists for Moving Image and Broadcast Materials: a Comparison. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, v.31, n.3/4, p.237-295, 2001. Available from: <http://repositories.cdlib.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6528&context=postprints>. Cited: 20 Mar. 2010.
• 2007.
• ZIPP, L. Core serial titles in an interdisciplinary field: the case of environmental geology. Library Resources & Technical Services, v.43, n.1, p.28-36, 1999.

Datas de Publicação

• Publicação nesta coleção
  04 Jul 2014
• Data do Fascículo
  Ago 2010

Histórico

• Recebido
  26 Jul 2010
• Aceito
  23 Ago 2010