Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Analysis of risk factors of abdominal wound dehiscence after radical cystectomy

SUMMARY

OBJECTIVE:

Wound dehiscence is associated with high morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to analyze the risk factors and comorbidities in the patients undergoing radical cystectomy with early postoperative wound dehiscence.

METHODS:

In all, 539 patients with bladder cancer who underwent radical cystectomy and urinary diversion at a single center between January 2008 and January 2022 were included in the study. The data related to the demographics, medical history, and perioperative clinical features were reviewed. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for wound dehiscence.

RESULTS:

The mean age of the patients was 64.2 years (22–91). The mean body mass index was 26.4 kg/m2 (18.7–35.4). Wound dehiscence was observed in 43 (7.9%) of 539 patients. The patients with wound dehiscence had significantly higher mean BMI (27.8 vs. 26.3, p=0.006), ASA scores (p=0.002), history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (30.2 vs. 14.3%, p=0.006), diabetes mellitus (44.2 vs. 17.9%, p=0.003), previous abdominal surgery (18.6 vs. 7.7%, p=0.014), and postoperative ileus (58.1 vs. 16.9%, p=0.006). In the multivariable regression model, diabetes mellitus (odds ratio [OR] 4.9, 95%CI 2.3–10.1; p<0.001), postoperative ileus (OR 8.1, 95%CI 4.1–16.5; p<0.001), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 2.6, 95%CI 1.2–5.7; p=0.013) were independent predictors of abdominal wound dehiscence following radical cystectomy.

CONCLUSION:

Diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and postoperative ileus were strongly associated with abdominal wound dehiscence following radical cystectomy. Both potential preventive and therapeutic interventions may decrease the risk of wound dehiscence.

KEYWORDS:
Urinary bladder neoplasms; Postoperative complications; Surgical wound dehiscence; Cystectomy; Risk factors

INTRODUCTION

Bladder cancer is the second most common urological malignancy, with urothelial carcinoma accounting for approximately 90% of all primary bladder tumors11 Burger M, Catto JW, Dalbagni G, Grossman HB, Herr H, Karakiewicz P, et al. Epidemiology and risk factors of urothelial bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2013;63(2):234-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.033
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07...
. The worldwide incidence rate is 9.5 for men and 2.4 for women (per 100,000 person-years)22 Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J, Rosso S, Coebergh JW, Comber H, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(6):1374-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2012.12.027
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2012.12.0...
. At the time of diagnosis, 70–75% of patients have a disease localized to the mucosa or submucosa, while 25–30% of patients have a muscle-invasive tumor33 Compérat E, Larré S, Roupret M, Neuzillet Y, Pignot G, Quintens H, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics of urothelial bladder cancer in patients less than 40 years old. Virchows Arch. 2015;466(5):589-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-015-1739-2
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-015-1739-...
. Radical cystectomy is the gold standard treatment option for muscle-invasive and high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer unresponsive to intravesical therapy. Radical cystectomy may lead to serious complications, particularly in the perioperative period. Although radical cystectomy can be performed with minimally invasive methods such as laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic methods, open radical cystectomy is still the most common treatment method44 Gill IS, Cacciamani GE. The changing face of urologic oncologic surgery from 2000–2018 (63 141 patients) - impact of robotics. Eur Urol Suppl. 2019;18(1):e656-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1569-9056(19)30485-3
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1569-9056(19)30...
,55 Jong IJ. Jaarverslag cystectomieregistratie NVU 2017. Tijdschr Urol. 2019;9:56-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13629-018-0241-4
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13629-018-0241-...
.

Open radical cystectomy surgery is performed through an abdominal midline incision. An abdominal wall surgical incision is created by cutting through all layers of the abdominal wall. The incidence of abdominal wound dehiscence after open radical cystectomy ranges between 3.5 and 9%66 Meyer CP, Rios Diaz AJ, Dalela D, Hanske J, Pucheril D, Schmid M, et al. Wound dehiscence in a sample of 1 776 cystectomies: identification of predictors and implications for outcomes. BJU Int. 2016;117(6B):E95-101. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13213
https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13213...
,77 Novotny V, Hakenberg OW, Wiessner D, Heberling U, Litz RJ, Oehlschlaeger S, et al. Perioperative complications of radical cystectomy in a contemporary series. Eur Urol. 2007;51(2):397-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2006.06.014
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2006.06...
. Abdominal wound dehiscence is a severe postoperative complication of abdominal surgeries with high morbidity and mortality rates. Despite technological advancement in materials, by constantly improving surgical techniques and precautionary measures, wound dehiscence continues to occur. Moreover, evisceration may occur as a result of abdominal wound dehiscence, requiring immediate surgical treatment. Wound dehiscence can lead to an increase in treatment costs, hospitalization, and re-intervention/readmission rates88 van Ramshorst GH, Nieuwenhuizen J, Hop WC, Arends P, Boom J, Jeekel J, et al. Abdominal wound dehiscence in adults: development and validation of a risk model. World J Surg. 2010;34(1):20-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0277-y
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0277-...
1010 Rosen AK, Loveland S, Shin M, Shwartz M, Hanchate A, Chen Q, et al. Examining the impact of the AHRQ Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) on the Veterans Health Administration: the case of readmissions. Med Care. 2013;51(1):37-44. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e318270c0f7
https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e318270...
. Several retrospective studies have been conducted to investigate the risk factors for this complication, but the results are contradictory66 Meyer CP, Rios Diaz AJ, Dalela D, Hanske J, Pucheril D, Schmid M, et al. Wound dehiscence in a sample of 1 776 cystectomies: identification of predictors and implications for outcomes. BJU Int. 2016;117(6B):E95-101. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13213
https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13213...
,1111 Mazzone E, Preisser F, Nazzani S, Tian Z, Zaffuto E, Gallina A, et al. The effect of age and comorbidities on early postoperative complications after radical cystectomy: a contemporary population-based analysis. J Geriatr Oncol. 2019;10(4):623-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2019.04.011
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2019.04.01...
. This study aimed to analyze the predictors of the wound dehiscence of the abdominal wall in patients undergoing open radical cystectomy and urinary diversion.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective study was conducted. We reviewed the electronic data and records of the patients with bladder cancer who underwent radical cystectomy and urinary diversion between January 2008 and January 2022 in our department. The patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of abdominal wound dehiscence. The data related to the demographics, medical history, and perioperative clinical features were reviewed. Diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and hypertension (HT) were defined as comorbidities and were recorded. Patients smoking cigarettes in the year before admission for surgery were considered smokers. Postoperative ileus (POI) was defined as the insertion of a nasogastric tube for nausea, abdominal distension, vomiting, or failure to tolerate a solid diet in the postoperative period. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores were evaluated by the anesthesiologists.

All radical cystectomy and urinary diversion surgeries were performed with a midline incision. Radical cystectomy included the bladder, seminal vesicles, and prostate in men and the bladder, uterus, both ovaries, and the anterior vaginal wall in women. Pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed in all cases, with the upper limit of lymphadenectomy extending to the common iliac vessels. Abdominal fascial closure was performed in all patients by or under the supervision of experienced urologists. Synthetic absorbable 0 polydioxanone monofilament sutures with running technique and mass closure method were used for all fascial closures. Abdominal dehiscence was defined as a partial or total separation of wound edges after the operation with or without intact fascia.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Determination of statistically significant factors was made by univariate and multivariate analysis. Statistical analyses were carried out using an unpaired t-test and the Mann-Whitney U test for univariate analysis. The main analysis of the study was multivariable analysis. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the association between categorical variables and postoperative wound dehiscence, and multivariate analysis using linear regression was used for the continuous variables. For each correlation, the odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval was calculated and reported. A p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Overall, 539 patients who underwent radical cystectomy and urinary diversion were identified. In descriptive analyses, 492 (91.3%) were male and 47 (8.7%) were female. The mean age of the patients was 64.2 years (range 22–91 years). The mean body mass index (BMI) was 26.4 kg/m2 (range 18.7–35.4 kg/m2). Patients with and without wound dehiscence were compared for demographic data, comorbidities, and perioperative outcomes, as reported in Table 1. Urinary diversion included ileal conduit in 474 (87.9%), ileal neobladder in 31 (5.7%), and ureterocutaneostomy in 34 (6.3%) patients. The mean operation time was 337 min (range 210–450 min).

Table 1
Patient characteristics.

Wound dehiscence was observed in 43 (7.9%) of 539 patients. The median day of diagnosis of wound dehiscence was 7.4 days (range 5–10 days) after the operation. Notably, 14 (32.5%) patients underwent a surgical revision for abdominal evisceration. The mean length of hospital stay was significantly longer in patients with wound dehiscence (25.6±3.1 days vs. 15.4±3.7 days, p<0.001).

The patients in the wound dehiscence group had higher mean BMI (27.8 vs. 26.3 kg/m2, p=0.006) and ASA score (p=0.002). History of COPD (30.2 vs. 14.3%, p=0.006), DM (44.2 vs. 17.9%, p=0.003), previous abdominal surgery (18.6 vs. 7.7%, p=0.014), and POI (58.1 vs. 16.9%, p=0.006) were also higher in this group. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of the history of HT, duration of operation, type of urinary diversion, and status of smoking. In the multivariable regression model, DM (OR 4.9, 95%CI 2.3–10.1; p<0.001), POI (OR 8.1, 95%CI 4.1–16.5; p<0.001), and COPD (OR 2.6, 95%CI 1.2–5.7; p=0.013) were independent predictors of abdominal wound dehiscence following radical cystectomy (Table 2).

Table 2
Risk-adjusted analysis of predictors of wound dehiscence after radical cystectomy.

DISCUSSION

Although the use of minimally invasive techniques such as laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy has been increased in the past two decades, open radical cystectomy is still the gold standard treatment for muscle-invasive and high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer unresponsive to intravesical therapy. Radical cystectomy is a complicated procedure with a high rate of risk and significant morbidity. Abdominal wound dehiscence is a rare but laborious postoperative complication after radical cystectomy. Our study indicated the importance of prognostic factors in abdominal wound dehiscence. The major finding of our study was that POI and comorbidities such as DM and COPD were the independent prognostic factors associated with abdominal wound dehiscence.

Dehiscence is the partial or complete separation of previously approximated wound margins caused by a failure of adequate wound healing. The basis of wound dehiscence is similar to the causes of inadequate wound healing and includes infection, increased abdominal pressure, DM, smoking, and obesity1212 Pavlidis TE, Galatianos IN, Papaziogas BT, Lazaridis CN, Atmatzidis KS, Makris JG et al. Complete dehiscence of the abdominal wound and incriminating factors. Eur J Surg. 2001;167(5):351-4. https://doi.org/10.1080/110241501750215221
https://doi.org/10.1080/1102415017502152...
,1313 Aksamija G, Mulabdic A, Rasic I, Aksamija L. Evaluation of risk factors of surgical wound dehiscence in adults after laparotomy. Med Arch. 2016;70(5):369-72. https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2016.70.369-372
https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2016.70.3...
. We found that POI is also an important predictive factor in the etiology of wound dehiscence since it increases intra-abdominal pressure in the postoperative period. We found the incidence of wound dehiscence following radical cystectomy to be 7.8%, which was similar to that found by the previous studies77 Novotny V, Hakenberg OW, Wiessner D, Heberling U, Litz RJ, Oehlschlaeger S, et al. Perioperative complications of radical cystectomy in a contemporary series. Eur Urol. 2007;51(2):397-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2006.06.014
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2006.06...
,1111 Mazzone E, Preisser F, Nazzani S, Tian Z, Zaffuto E, Gallina A, et al. The effect of age and comorbidities on early postoperative complications after radical cystectomy: a contemporary population-based analysis. J Geriatr Oncol. 2019;10(4):623-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2019.04.011
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2019.04.01...
.

Obesity increases the risk of wound dehiscence. The association between obesity and wound healing has long been determined in the literature1414 Pierpont YN, Dinh TP, Salas RE, Johnson EL, Wright TG, Robson MC, et al. Obesity and surgical wound healing: a current review. ISRN Obes. 2014;2014:638936. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/638936
https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/638936...
. We found that patients with a higher BMI have the highest rates of wound dehiscence. Prior to surgery, the patient's nutrition intake should be optimized to reduce the risk of wound dehiscence. These patients may benefit from dietary supplementation with vitamins and zinc1414 Pierpont YN, Dinh TP, Salas RE, Johnson EL, Wright TG, Robson MC, et al. Obesity and surgical wound healing: a current review. ISRN Obes. 2014;2014:638936. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/638936
https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/638936...
. DM-related microvascular dysfunction may impair regular blood flow, resulting in poor wound perfusion. Hyperglycemia also raises the risk of wound infection, which slows the healing process1515 Black E, Vibe-Petersen J, Jorgensen LN, Madsen SM, Agren MS, Holstein PE, et al. Decrease of collagen deposition in wound repair in type 1 diabetes independent of glycemic control. Arch Surg. 2003;138(1):34-40. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.138.1.34
https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.138.1.3...
. In our study, we found that DM was a predictor of wound dehiscence. Preoperative blood glucose control and postoperative blood glucose level monitoring appear to be effective in preventing wound complications. Moreover, it is well established that older patients are at greater risk of complications after radical cystectomy1616 Novotny V, Zastrow S, Koch R, Wirth MP. Radical cystectomy in patients over 70 years of age: impact of comorbidity on perioperative morbidity and mortality. World J Urol. 2012;30(6):769-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0782-0
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0782-...
. However, a large series of radical cystectomies showed that patients’ age did not predict postoperative wound complications66 Meyer CP, Rios Diaz AJ, Dalela D, Hanske J, Pucheril D, Schmid M, et al. Wound dehiscence in a sample of 1 776 cystectomies: identification of predictors and implications for outcomes. BJU Int. 2016;117(6B):E95-101. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13213
https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13213...
,1111 Mazzone E, Preisser F, Nazzani S, Tian Z, Zaffuto E, Gallina A, et al. The effect of age and comorbidities on early postoperative complications after radical cystectomy: a contemporary population-based analysis. J Geriatr Oncol. 2019;10(4):623-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2019.04.011
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2019.04.01...
. Age was not found to have a significant effect on our cohort. This finding may be explained by the fact that patients undergoing radical cystectomy are mostly within the same decade of age. Furthermore, a recent predictive model emphasized the five-factor model (i.e., male gender, infection, COPD, smoking, and overweight) for estimation of the incidence of wound dehiscence risk following radical cystectomy1717 Nasrallah AA, Mansour M, Abou Heidar NF, Ayoub C, Najdi JA, Tamim H, et al. Risk factors for wound dehiscence following radical cystectomy: a prediction model. Ther Adv Urol. 2021;13:17562872211060570. https://doi.org 10.1177/17562872211060570
https://doi.org 10.1177/1756287221106057...
.

In our study, the risk of wound dehiscence increased in patients with COPD, which was consistent with the previous studies66 Meyer CP, Rios Diaz AJ, Dalela D, Hanske J, Pucheril D, Schmid M, et al. Wound dehiscence in a sample of 1 776 cystectomies: identification of predictors and implications for outcomes. BJU Int. 2016;117(6B):E95-101. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13213
https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13213...
. Wound healing may be impaired in patients with COPD since they have low oxygen levels and are usually long-term smokers1818 Sørensen LT. Wound healing and infection in surgery. The clinical impact of smoking and smoking cessation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Surg. 2012;147(4):373-83. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2012.5
https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2012.5...
. Moreover, patients with COPD have a high risk of postoperative atelectasis and pneumonia, which may cause intense cough1919 Wong DH, Weber EC, Schell MJ, Wong AB, Anderson CT, Barker SJ. Factors associated with postoperative pulmonary complications in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Anesth Analg. 1995;80(2):276-84. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-199502000-00013
https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-1995020...
. This intense cough in the postoperative period causes an increase in intra-abdominal pressure, which may lead to wound dehiscence. In the treatment of these patients, regional anesthesia should be used whenever possible since it provides both postoperative lung rehabilitation and pain management2020 Maddali MM. Chronic obstructive lung disease: Perioperative management. Middle East J Anesthesiol. 2008;19(6):1219-39. PMID: 18942241. Similar to COPD, smoking can lead to both impaired wound healing and pulmonary complications in the postoperative period. To prevent complications due to intense cough in the postoperative period, quitting smoking for 4–6 weeks before the operation reduces postoperative pulmonary complications2121 Nakagawa M, Tanaka H, Tsukuma H, Kishi Y. Relationship between the duration of the preoperative smoke-free period and the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications after pulmonary surgery. Chest. 2001;120(3):705-10. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.120.3.705
https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.120.3.705...
.

The type of abdominal closure may play an important role in wound complications. In our experience, we use slowly absorbable monofilament (polydioxanone) sutures with continuous technique and mass closure method for abdominal wall closure after laparotomy. In a Cochrane review of 55 randomized trials (19,174 patients), no evidence was found that suture absorption (absorbable vs. nonabsorbable sutures, or slow vs. fast absorbable sutures), closure method (mass vs. layered), or closure technique (continuous vs. interrupted) resulted in any difference in the risk of wound complications2222 Patel SV, Paskar DD, Nelson RL, Vedula SS, Steele SR. Closure methods for laparotomy incisions for preventing incisional hernias and other wound complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;11(11):CD005661. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005661.pub2
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD00566...
. However, only about one-half of the included trials (26) enrolled patients who underwent midline incisions exclusively. Preventive strategies such as negative pressure wound therapy and prophylactic retention sutures in patients undergoing radical cystectomy seem feasible2323 Khorgami Z, Shoar S, Laghaie B, Aminian A, Hosseini Araghi N, Soroush A. Prophylactic retention sutures in midline laparotomy in high-risk patients for wound dehiscence: a randomized controlled trial. J Surg Res. 2013;180(2):238-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2012.05.012
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2012.05.01...
,2424 Joice GA, Tema G, Semerjian A, Gupta M, Bell M, Walker J, et al. Evaluation of incisional negative pressure wound therapy in the prevention of surgical site occurrences after radical cystectomy: a new addition to enhanced recovery after surgery protocol. Eur Urol Focus. 2020;6(4):698-703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2019.09.016
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2019.09.01...
.

The incidence/definition of POI after radical cystectomy is highly variable, and the incidence of POI ranges from 1.5 to 23.5%2525 Ramirez JA, McIntosh AG, Strehlow R, Lawrence VA, Parekh DJ, Svatek RS. Definition, incidence, risk factors, and prevention of paralytic ileus following radical cystectomy: a systematic review. Eur Urol. 2013;64(4):588-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.11.051
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.11...
. POI is characterized by abdominal distention and bloating, nausea, vomiting, and delayed passage of flatus and defecation. Increased intra-abdominal pressure due to prolonged POI causes more strain on the wound margins, causing the sutures to injure the muscles and fascia. The choice of anesthesia and postoperative analgesia method also affects the development of prolonged POI. It has been shown that patients with epidural catheters have been found to have reduced recovery time to return to normal gastrointestinal function2626 Guay J, Nishimori M, Kopp S. Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens for postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, vomiting and pain after abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;7(7):CD001893. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001893.pub2
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD00189...
. Moreover, patients who receive alvimopan (a selective peripherally acting mu-opioid receptor antagonist) after radical cystectomy had quicker bowel recovery2727 Lee CT, Chang SS, Kamat AM, Amiel G, Beard TL, Fergany A, et al. Alvimopan accelerates gastrointestinal recovery after radical cystectomy: a multicenter randomized placebo-controlled trial. Eur Urol. 2014;66(2):265-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.02.036
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.02...
.

The study has certain limitations, the most important being its retrospective nature. Considering the small number of patients with these risk factors, another limitation is the lack of information about hypoproteinemia, preoperative steroid use, and wound infection, which are shown to be risk factors for wound dehiscence. Another limitation is that although the same closure technique is used in each patient, this procedure may be performed by different surgeons.

CONCLUSION

Wound dehiscence is a severe complication with a low incidence but significant morbidity, and it increases treatment costs and length of hospital stay. In the literature, there is a lack of evidence about prognostic factors for abdominal wound dehiscence in patients undergoing radical cystectomy. This study adds new data about the predictors of wound dehiscence risk after radical cystectomy. We identified POI and comorbidities such as DM and COPD as independent risk factors for abdominal wound dehiscence following radical cystectomy. Preoperative identification of these risk factors and taking necessary precautions may help prevent this challenging complication after radical cystectomy.

  • Funding: none.

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Burger M, Catto JW, Dalbagni G, Grossman HB, Herr H, Karakiewicz P, et al. Epidemiology and risk factors of urothelial bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2013;63(2):234-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.033
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.033
  • 2
    Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J, Rosso S, Coebergh JW, Comber H, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(6):1374-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2012.12.027
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2012.12.027
  • 3
    Compérat E, Larré S, Roupret M, Neuzillet Y, Pignot G, Quintens H, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics of urothelial bladder cancer in patients less than 40 years old. Virchows Arch. 2015;466(5):589-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-015-1739-2
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-015-1739-2
  • 4
    Gill IS, Cacciamani GE. The changing face of urologic oncologic surgery from 2000–2018 (63 141 patients) - impact of robotics. Eur Urol Suppl. 2019;18(1):e656-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1569-9056(19)30485-3
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/S1569-9056(19)30485-3
  • 5
    Jong IJ. Jaarverslag cystectomieregistratie NVU 2017. Tijdschr Urol. 2019;9:56-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13629-018-0241-4
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s13629-018-0241-4
  • 6
    Meyer CP, Rios Diaz AJ, Dalela D, Hanske J, Pucheril D, Schmid M, et al. Wound dehiscence in a sample of 1 776 cystectomies: identification of predictors and implications for outcomes. BJU Int. 2016;117(6B):E95-101. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13213
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13213
  • 7
    Novotny V, Hakenberg OW, Wiessner D, Heberling U, Litz RJ, Oehlschlaeger S, et al. Perioperative complications of radical cystectomy in a contemporary series. Eur Urol. 2007;51(2):397-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2006.06.014
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2006.06.014
  • 8
    van Ramshorst GH, Nieuwenhuizen J, Hop WC, Arends P, Boom J, Jeekel J, et al. Abdominal wound dehiscence in adults: development and validation of a risk model. World J Surg. 2010;34(1):20-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0277-y
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0277-y
  • 9
    Zoucas E, Lydrup ML. Hospital costs associated with surgical morbidity after elective colorectal procedures: a retrospective observational cohort study in 530 patients. Patient Saf Surg. 2014;8(1):2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-8-2
    » https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-8-2
  • 10
    Rosen AK, Loveland S, Shin M, Shwartz M, Hanchate A, Chen Q, et al. Examining the impact of the AHRQ Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) on the Veterans Health Administration: the case of readmissions. Med Care. 2013;51(1):37-44. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e318270c0f7
    » https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e318270c0f7
  • 11
    Mazzone E, Preisser F, Nazzani S, Tian Z, Zaffuto E, Gallina A, et al. The effect of age and comorbidities on early postoperative complications after radical cystectomy: a contemporary population-based analysis. J Geriatr Oncol. 2019;10(4):623-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2019.04.011
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2019.04.011
  • 12
    Pavlidis TE, Galatianos IN, Papaziogas BT, Lazaridis CN, Atmatzidis KS, Makris JG et al. Complete dehiscence of the abdominal wound and incriminating factors. Eur J Surg. 2001;167(5):351-4. https://doi.org/10.1080/110241501750215221
    » https://doi.org/10.1080/110241501750215221
  • 13
    Aksamija G, Mulabdic A, Rasic I, Aksamija L. Evaluation of risk factors of surgical wound dehiscence in adults after laparotomy. Med Arch. 2016;70(5):369-72. https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2016.70.369-372
    » https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2016.70.369-372
  • 14
    Pierpont YN, Dinh TP, Salas RE, Johnson EL, Wright TG, Robson MC, et al. Obesity and surgical wound healing: a current review. ISRN Obes. 2014;2014:638936. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/638936
    » https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/638936
  • 15
    Black E, Vibe-Petersen J, Jorgensen LN, Madsen SM, Agren MS, Holstein PE, et al. Decrease of collagen deposition in wound repair in type 1 diabetes independent of glycemic control. Arch Surg. 2003;138(1):34-40. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.138.1.34
    » https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.138.1.34
  • 16
    Novotny V, Zastrow S, Koch R, Wirth MP. Radical cystectomy in patients over 70 years of age: impact of comorbidity on perioperative morbidity and mortality. World J Urol. 2012;30(6):769-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0782-0
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0782-0
  • 17
    Nasrallah AA, Mansour M, Abou Heidar NF, Ayoub C, Najdi JA, Tamim H, et al. Risk factors for wound dehiscence following radical cystectomy: a prediction model. Ther Adv Urol. 2021;13:17562872211060570. https://doi.org 10.1177/17562872211060570
    » https://doi.org 10.1177/17562872211060570
  • 18
    Sørensen LT. Wound healing and infection in surgery. The clinical impact of smoking and smoking cessation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Surg. 2012;147(4):373-83. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2012.5
    » https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2012.5
  • 19
    Wong DH, Weber EC, Schell MJ, Wong AB, Anderson CT, Barker SJ. Factors associated with postoperative pulmonary complications in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Anesth Analg. 1995;80(2):276-84. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-199502000-00013
    » https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-199502000-00013
  • 20
    Maddali MM. Chronic obstructive lung disease: Perioperative management. Middle East J Anesthesiol. 2008;19(6):1219-39. PMID: 18942241
  • 21
    Nakagawa M, Tanaka H, Tsukuma H, Kishi Y. Relationship between the duration of the preoperative smoke-free period and the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications after pulmonary surgery. Chest. 2001;120(3):705-10. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.120.3.705
    » https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.120.3.705
  • 22
    Patel SV, Paskar DD, Nelson RL, Vedula SS, Steele SR. Closure methods for laparotomy incisions for preventing incisional hernias and other wound complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;11(11):CD005661. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005661.pub2
    » https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005661.pub2
  • 23
    Khorgami Z, Shoar S, Laghaie B, Aminian A, Hosseini Araghi N, Soroush A. Prophylactic retention sutures in midline laparotomy in high-risk patients for wound dehiscence: a randomized controlled trial. J Surg Res. 2013;180(2):238-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2012.05.012
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2012.05.012
  • 24
    Joice GA, Tema G, Semerjian A, Gupta M, Bell M, Walker J, et al. Evaluation of incisional negative pressure wound therapy in the prevention of surgical site occurrences after radical cystectomy: a new addition to enhanced recovery after surgery protocol. Eur Urol Focus. 2020;6(4):698-703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2019.09.016
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2019.09.016
  • 25
    Ramirez JA, McIntosh AG, Strehlow R, Lawrence VA, Parekh DJ, Svatek RS. Definition, incidence, risk factors, and prevention of paralytic ileus following radical cystectomy: a systematic review. Eur Urol. 2013;64(4):588-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.11.051
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.11.051
  • 26
    Guay J, Nishimori M, Kopp S. Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens for postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, vomiting and pain after abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;7(7):CD001893. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001893.pub2
    » https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001893.pub2
  • 27
    Lee CT, Chang SS, Kamat AM, Amiel G, Beard TL, Fergany A, et al. Alvimopan accelerates gastrointestinal recovery after radical cystectomy: a multicenter randomized placebo-controlled trial. Eur Urol. 2014;66(2):265-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.02.036
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.02.036

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    28 Nov 2022
  • Date of issue
    2022

History

  • Received
    31 July 2022
  • Accepted
    03 Aug 2022
Associação Médica Brasileira R. São Carlos do Pinhal, 324, 01333-903 São Paulo SP - Brazil, Tel: +55 11 3178-6800, Fax: +55 11 3178-6816 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: ramb@amb.org.br