Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Fluctuating asymmetry and organosomatic indexes in fish: the Corocoro grunt as a case study (Haemulidae)

Abstract

Fluctuation asymmetries (FA) are random on the bilateral symmetry plan of paired morphological characters, and other types of symmetry, such as: for instance, translational or rotational symmetry, in response to environmental, and genetic stress. The relationship of FA with gonadossomatic (GSI), hepatosomatic (HSI), and fullness (RI) indexes and condition factor (K) for juveniles (n=8), adults (n=32), males (n=9), and females (n=26) of Corocoro grunt Orthopristis ruber were evaluated in this paper. The composite fluctuating asymmetry (CFA) was used to calculate the combined effects of FA over these four organosomatic indexes of 66 Corocoro grunt caught during 2011 in Guanabara Bay, Brazil, one of the most eutrophic coastal bays in the world. Redundancy Analysis (RDA) confirmed a significant relationship between CFA and the physiological descriptors (HSI, RI, K), but without clear differences among juveniles, adults, and sexes. Our results support the potential of CFA to be used as a proxy of environmental effects over reef-associated fish species in a tropical bay, but the relationship between CFA and physiological descriptors is complex, and further studies, such as experimental trials, are needed.

Key words
Bioindicator; Brazil; Guanabara Bay; Haemulid

INTRODUCTION

Fluctuating asymmetries (FA) are small, random deviations from symmetry that occur in the development of bilaterally symmetrical characters (Van Vallen 1962VAN VALLEN L. 1962. A study of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution 16: 125-142.), and are commonly used as a measure of developmental stability. Thus, a high level of FA is assumed to reflect reduced developmental stability. Considered as a whole-organism indicator of stress, FA theory relies on that deviations in bilateral symmetry will rise with increased instability of an organism along with its development (Sopinka et al. 2017SOPINKA NM, DONALDSON MR, O’CONNOR CM, SUSKI CD & COOKE SJ. 2017. Stress Indicators in Fish. London: Academic Press.). The levels of FA are thus correlated with individual fitness (i.e. the ability to survive, flourish, and carry on the successful qualities through genes to offspring) and the adaptive ability of the entire population, also supporting inferences on the health of the whole ecosystem (Palmer 1994PALMER AR. 1994. Fluctuating asymmetry analyses: A primer. In: Markow TA (Ed), Developmental Instability: Its Origins and Evolutionary Implications. Kluwer: Dordrecht, p. 335-364., Oxnevad et al. 2002OXNEVAD SA, HEIBO E & VOLLESTAD LA. 2002. Is there a relationship between fluctuating asymmetry and reproductive investment in perch (Perca fluviatilis)? Can J Zool 80: 120-125., Palmer & Strobeck 2003PALMER AR & STROBECK C. 2003. Fluctuating asymmetry analyses revisited. In: Polak M (Ed), Developmental Instability (DI): Causes and Consequences. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, p. 279-319., Sopinka et al. 2017SOPINKA NM, DONALDSON MR, O’CONNOR CM, SUSKI CD & COOKE SJ. 2017. Stress Indicators in Fish. London: Academic Press.). Despite its increased application for environmental and biomonitoring assessments, the connections of FA levels with other secondary or tertiary measures of stress are barely known, except for few studies.

Changes in fish growth, condition, and health can be also used to indicate the extent to which stress may affect fish performance and provide a basis for understanding the effects of environmental perturbations on fish populations (Barton et al. 2002BARTON BA, MORGAN JD & VIJAYAN MM. 2002. Physiological and condition-related indicators of environmental stress in fish. In: Adams SM (Ed), Biological Indicators of Aquatic Ecosystem Stress. American Fisheries Society, p. 111-148.). The relationship of FA levels with adaptive fitness, reproductive success (Bakker et al. 2006BAKKER TCM, MAZZI D & KRAAK SBM. 2006. Broods of attractive three-spined stickleback males require greater paternal care. J Fish Biol 69: 1164-1177.), egg size (Hechter et al. 2000HECHTER RP, MOODIE PF & MOODIE GEE. 2000. Pectoral fin asymmetry, dimorphism, and fecundity in the brook stickleback, Culaea inconstans. Behavior 137: 999-1009.), and pollution levels in fish (Lajus et al. 2015LAJUS D, YURTSEVA A, BIRCH G & BOOTH DJ. 2015. Fluctuating asymmetry as a pollution monitor: The Australian estuarine smooth toadfish Tetractenos glaber (Teleostei: Tetraodontidae). Mar Pollut Bull 101: 758-767.) has been addressed recently. Other more physiological and condition-related indicators of environmental stress in fish have been proposed, but whether FA levels are associated with organosomatic indexes related to the fish condition, such as the condition factor, and gonadosomatic, hepatosomatic, and fullness indexes are virtually unknown, especially for tropical marine ecosystems (Sopinka et al. 2017SOPINKA NM, DONALDSON MR, O’CONNOR CM, SUSKI CD & COOKE SJ. 2017. Stress Indicators in Fish. London: Academic Press.).

Guanabara Bay (GB), located in southeastern Brazil, is one of the most degraded coastal environments in the world, undergoing long-term effects of organic and chemical diffuse pollution and disordered use of watershed (Kjerfve et al. 1997KJERFVE B, RIBEIRO CHA, DIASI GTM, FILIPPO AM & QUARESMA VS. 1997. Oceanographic characteristics of an impacted coastal bay: Baía de Guanabara, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Cont Shelf Res 17: 1609-1643., Fistarol et al. 2015FISTAROL GO ET AL. 2015. Environmental and Sanitary Conditions of Guanabara Bay, Rio de Janeiro. Front Microbiol 6: 1-17.). Environmental disturbances started early in the XVI century in GB but escalated especially since 1930 with the aggravation of the industrialization process, which have increased significantly the concentrations of inorganic nutrients (mainly phosphorus), heavy metals (particularly Pb, Cr, Cu, and Ni), and several refractory organic pollutants (such as PCBs) both in the water column and bottom sediments (Kjerfve et al. 1997KJERFVE B, RIBEIRO CHA, DIASI GTM, FILIPPO AM & QUARESMA VS. 1997. Oceanographic characteristics of an impacted coastal bay: Baía de Guanabara, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Cont Shelf Res 17: 1609-1643., Kehrig et al. 2010KEHRIG HA, SEIXAS TG, BAÊTA AP, MALM O & MOREIRA I. 2010. Inorganic and methylmercury: Do they transfer along with a tropical coastal food web? Mar Pollut Bull 60: 2350-2356., Silveira et al. 2017SILVEIRA AEF, NASCIMENTO JR, SANTOS ES & BIDONE ED. 2017. Screening-level risk assessment applied to dredging of polluted sediments from Guanabara Bay, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Mar Pollut Bull 118: 368-375.). This ~380 km2 bay is located in Rio de Janeiro city and its surroundings, the second largest industrial center in Brazil. As consequence, there are more than 12.000 industries in the drainage basin, which accounted for 60% of the state’s facilities and 25% of the organic pollution released to the bay (Soares-Gomes et al. 2016SOARES-GOMES A, DA GAMA BAP, BAPTISTA NETO JA, FREIRE DG, CORDEIRO RC, MACHADO W, BERNARDES MC, COUTINHO R, THOMPSON FL & PEREIRA RC. 2016. An environmental overview of Guanabara Bay, Rio de Janeiro. Reg Stud Mar Sci 8: 319-330., Baptista et al. 2017BAPTISTA JA, BARRETO CF, VILELA CG, FONSECA EM, MELO GV & BARTH OM. 2017. Environmental change in Guanabara Bay, SE, Brazil, based in microfaunal, pollen, and geochemical proxies in sedimentary cores. Ocean Coast Manage 143: 4-15.). Approximately 500 tons of raw sewage (~80% of biochemical oxygen demand) is discharged daily through river inflow, leading to a complex load of nutrients and toxic chemicals in the water column and bottom sediments (Silveira et al. 2017SILVEIRA AEF, NASCIMENTO JR, SANTOS ES & BIDONE ED. 2017. Screening-level risk assessment applied to dredging of polluted sediments from Guanabara Bay, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Mar Pollut Bull 118: 368-375.). Therefore, GB shows a complex pattern of water quality, of considerable spatial and temporal variability, depending on the combining effects of river inflow, watershed use, and the seasonal regime of rainstorms, this latter harshening the input of sewage and chemical contaminants to the system (Kjerfve et al. 1997KJERFVE B, RIBEIRO CHA, DIASI GTM, FILIPPO AM & QUARESMA VS. 1997. Oceanographic characteristics of an impacted coastal bay: Baía de Guanabara, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Cont Shelf Res 17: 1609-1643.).

The Corocoro grunt Orthopristis ruber (Cuvier 1830) is a Haemulid fish commonly found near rocky and reef substrates across the South Atlantic coast and widespread in several marines and estuaries systems along the Brazilian coast (Vianna & Verani 2002VIANNA M & VERANI JR. 2002. Biologia populacional de Orthopristis ruber (Teleostei, Haemulidae) espécie acompanhante da pesca de arrasto do camarão-rosa, no sudeste brasileiro. Atlântica 23: 27-36.). Corocoro grunt preys mainly on invertebrates and small fish (Kehrig et al. 2010KEHRIG HA, SEIXAS TG, BAÊTA AP, MALM O & MOREIRA I. 2010. Inorganic and methylmercury: Do they transfer along with a tropical coastal food web? Mar Pollut Bull 60: 2350-2356.) and spawns throughout the year, with peaks in spring and summer (Garcia et al. 2010GARCIA J, MENDES LF, SAMPAIO CLS & LINS JE. 2010. Biodiversidade Marinha da Bacia Potiguar: Ictiofauna. Rio de Janeiro: Museu Nacional, 195 p.). This species is associated with rocky shores in GB (Seixas et al. 2016SEIXAS LB, SANTOS AFGN & SANTOS LN. 2016. Fluctuating asymmetry: a tool for an impact assessment on fish populations in a tropical polluted bay, Brazilian. Ecol. Indic 71: 522-532.), showing high site-fidelity when < 300 mm total length (TL) and greater abundances in the outer zones of this bay (Chaves et al. 2018CHAVES MCN, FRANCO ACS, SEIXAS LB, CRUZ LV & SANTOS LN. 2018. Testing the ecocline concept for fish assemblages along the marine-estuarine gradient in a highly-eutrophic estuary (Guanabara Bay, Brazil). Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 211:118-126.).

In this paper, the deviation from bilateral symmetry in six morphometric and meristic characters of O. ruber captured GB was investigated. The hypothesize is that the greater the fluctuating asymmetry, the lower the species’ physiological indices, with differences between life stages and sexes. The aims of this study are: (1) to test composite fluctuating asymmetry (CFA) among the juvenile and adults, and males, and females, (2) compare the levels of CFA among the four descriptors of the physiological condition of O. ruber, and correlate them with life stages and sexes, and (3) to evaluate the implications the fluctuating asymmetry being applied as proxies of the ecological integrity of tropical bays.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study area

Guanabara Bay (22°24’– 22°57’S, 42°33’– 43°19’W), covering approximately 384 km2 of surface area and yielding 12 million inhabitants living in the surroundings, wherein 74.3% are composed of urbanized areas (IBGE 2017IBGE. 2017. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Atlas do censo demográfico 2010, Rio de Janeiro.). The drainage basin accounts for the receptor of most of the effluents produced by industrial plants, two international airports, and two harbors landing approximately 2,000 commercial ships every year (Baptista et al. 2017BAPTISTA JA, BARRETO CF, VILELA CG, FONSECA EM, MELO GV & BARTH OM. 2017. Environmental change in Guanabara Bay, SE, Brazil, based in microfaunal, pollen, and geochemical proxies in sedimentary cores. Ocean Coast Manage 143: 4-15.). This bay also has two naval bases, 20 shipyards, thousands of ferries, fishing boats, and yachts, and a large Petrochemical Complex responding by 7% of the national oil refining (Kjerfve et al. 1997KJERFVE B, RIBEIRO CHA, DIASI GTM, FILIPPO AM & QUARESMA VS. 1997. Oceanographic characteristics of an impacted coastal bay: Baía de Guanabara, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Cont Shelf Res 17: 1609-1643., Fistarol et al. 2015FISTAROL GO ET AL. 2015. Environmental and Sanitary Conditions of Guanabara Bay, Rio de Janeiro. Front Microbiol 6: 1-17.). Sedimentation rates range from 0.60-2.2 cm per year, and their growing levels are attributed to the increased urbanization process (Soares-Gomes et al. 2016SOARES-GOMES A, DA GAMA BAP, BAPTISTA NETO JA, FREIRE DG, CORDEIRO RC, MACHADO W, BERNARDES MC, COUTINHO R, THOMPSON FL & PEREIRA RC. 2016. An environmental overview of Guanabara Bay, Rio de Janeiro. Reg Stud Mar Sci 8: 319-330.). A total of 174 species is listed for the marine and estuarine fish assemblages inhabiting Guanabara Bay (Vianna et al. 2012VIANNA M, ANDRADE-TUBINO MF, KEUNECKE KA, ANDRADE AC, SILVA DR & PADULA V. 2012. Estado atual de conhecimento sobre a ictiofauna. In: Meniconi et al. (Eds), Baía de Guanabara. Síntese do Conhecimento Ambiental. Vol. II. Biodiversidade. Rio de Janeiro: Petrobras.), which persist in using this ecosystem as feeding and nursery grounds, despite the increasingly environmental disturbances (Castro et al. 2005CASTRO MS, BONECKER ACT & VALENTIN JL. 2005. Seasonal variation in fish larvae at the entrance of Guanabara Bay. Brazil. Braz Arch Biol Technol 48: 121-128., Franco et al. 2016FRANCO ACS, RAMOS CHAVES MCN, CASTEL-BRANCO MPB & SANTOS LN. 2016. Responses of fish assemblages of sandy beaches to different anthropogenic and hydrodynamic influences. J Fish Biol 89: 921-938., Souza et al. 2018SOUZA JS, SANTOS LN & SANTOS AFGN. 2018. Habitat features, not water variables explain most of the fish assemblages’ use of sandy beaches in a Brazilian eutrophic bay. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 211: 100-109.).

Fish sampling and data analysis

Orthopristis ruber was sampled from inner to outer zones of Guanabara Bay, Rio de Janeiro - Brazil, encompassing most of its environmental gradient (Fistarol et al. 2015FISTAROL GO ET AL. 2015. Environmental and Sanitary Conditions of Guanabara Bay, Rio de Janeiro. Front Microbiol 6: 1-17.). The areas studied were: Urca, Rio-Niterói Bridge, and Paquetá Island. Seixas et al. (2016)SEIXAS LB, SANTOS AFGN & SANTOS LN. 2016. Fluctuating asymmetry: a tool for an impact assessment on fish populations in a tropical polluted bay, Brazilian. Ecol. Indic 71: 522-532. demonstrated that the level of CFA in O. ruber was significantly lower in the Urca region (less impacted) than for individuals caught near the Paquetá Island and Rio-Niterói Bridge sites (more degraded). Thus so it was compared the levels of CFA, among the four descriptors of the physiological condition of O. ruber, and correlates them with life stages and sexes, in these sites.

Monofilament gillnets (20 m) of three different mesh (15, 30, and 45 mm between adjacent knots) were tied together to form a set (60 m × 1.5 m) that was used to capture fish in the three sampling sites. Fish were caught in dry (September end of winter season) and rainy (December end of spring season) periods of 2011. Gillnet sets (three replicates per site) were deployed, perpendicularly to the shore, over the rocky substrates of the three sampling sites, and recovered 24h later. Rocky substrates were chosen not only to standardize the habitat for sampling but also because of the high fidelity of O. ruber with hard substrates (Chaves et al. 2018CHAVES MCN, FRANCO ACS, SEIXAS LB, CRUZ LV & SANTOS LN. 2018. Testing the ecocline concept for fish assemblages along the marine-estuarine gradient in a highly-eutrophic estuary (Guanabara Bay, Brazil). Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 211:118-126.).

A total of 66 Corocoro grunts was captured and euthanized in ice in the field, and then transferred to the Laboratory of Theoretical and Applied Ichthyology (LICTA) at Federal University of Rio de Janeiro State (UNIRIO), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The right (R) and left (L) sides of six bilateral body structures were inspected by the same single researcher, using the same binocular stereomicroscope (Zeiss Stemi DV4, 8× magnification) and digital caliper for morphometric measurements, to minimize possible effects of methodological artifacts on asymmetry results. The diameter of the eye (EYD), length of the pectoral fins (LPF), length of ventral fins (LVF) were the three morphometric traits assessed, while the number of gill rakers (NGR), number of pectoral fin rays (NPR), and number of ventral fin rays (NVR) were the three meristic traits evaluated. Specimens with damaged fins were removed from the analysis. PERMANOVA (Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance) was applied (Euclidean Distance, 10,000 permutations per analysis) to detect possible measurement errors between the first and second measurements. All morphological attributes were measured twice (i.e. independent measures) to evaluate the importance of measurement errors on FA levels, according to Palmer & Strobeck (1986)PALMER R & STROBECK C. 1986. Fluctuating asymmetry: measurement, analysis, patterns. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 17: 391-421.. The side of the structure in O. ruber was considered as a fixed factor and each fish as a random factor in all PERMANOVA tests. Significant trait side × fish interactions (p<0.05) denote the negligible effects of measurement errors on the FAs. Non-significant results (p>0.05) indicate that measurement errors were negligible.

The composite fluctuating asymmetry (CFA) was used to calculate the combined effects of FA from all of the six morphological traits according to Leung et al. (2000)LEUNG B, FORBES MR & HOULE D. 2000. Fluctuating asymmetry as a bioindicator of stress: comparing the efficacy of analyses involving multiple traits. Am Nat 155: 101-115.. The CFA can be computed by summing of absolute FA values for all traits for each individual (CFA=∑|R-L|). The CFA is regarded as less sensitive to sampling and measurement biases than individual indexes (Leung et al. 2000LEUNG B, FORBES MR & HOULE D. 2000. Fluctuating asymmetry as a bioindicator of stress: comparing the efficacy of analyses involving multiple traits. Am Nat 155: 101-115.). The validation of the presence of FA followed the protocol composed by Seixas et al. (2016)SEIXAS LB, SANTOS AFGN & SANTOS LN. 2016. Fluctuating asymmetry: a tool for an impact assessment on fish populations in a tropical polluted bay, Brazilian. Ecol. Indic 71: 522-532. that was applied to this same database.

Four descriptors of the physiological condition of O. ruber were used: condition factor (K), and gonadosomatic (GSI), hepatosomatic (HSI), and fullness (RI) indexes. GSI, HSI, and K were determined as in Vazzoler (1996)VAZZOLER AEA. 1996. Biologia da reprodução de peixes Teleósteos: Teoria e prática. Maringá: Eduem, 169 p.: GSI = Gw×Ew-1, HSI = Lw×Ew-1, K = Tw×Tl-3. The RI index was calculated as in Hyslop (1980)HYSLOP EJ. 1980. Stomach content analysis: a review of methods and their applications. J Fish Biol 17: 411-429.: RI = (Sw×Ew-1)×100, where, Gw = gonad weight, Lw = liver weight, Sw = stomach weight, Ew = eviscerated weight, Tw = total weight, and Tl = Total length.

Fish was classified as male or female through macroscopic inspection of gonads, and as juvenile or adult after comparing the total length of each individual with the size of first maturation (L50 = 160 mm TL) proposed by Vianna & Verani (2002)VIANNA M & VERANI JR. 2002. Biologia populacional de Orthopristis ruber (Teleostei, Haemulidae) espécie acompanhante da pesca de arrasto do camarão-rosa, no sudeste brasileiro. Atlântica 23: 27-36..

PERMANOVA was performed on a data matrix, to test for differences in the four physiological descriptors between juvenile and adult, and sex. The Euclidean distance was used and data was permuted 4,999 per analysis and p<0.10 was regarded as significant. All PERMANOVA analyses were performed with PAST 3.10 (Hammer et al. 2001HAMMER O, HARPER DA & RYAN P. 2001. Past: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeont Elect.).

Multivariate ordination analyses were also applied to assess the relationship of the CFA in O. ruber with the four physiological descriptors between juvenile and adult, and sex. Partial Redundancy Analysis (RDA) was applied, using TL as covariable (i.e. to control for the effects of fish size). Monte Carlo permutation tests were performed to test the significance of the axes (p ≤ 0.05). The Generalized Additive Models (GAMs) were used to investigate relationships between CFA with the scores of RDA axes.

The step-by-step selection procedure and the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) were used to determine the complexity of the model. AIC considers not only the goodness of fit but also parsimony, penalizing more complex models (Burnham & Anderson 1998BURNHAM KP & ANDERSON DR. 1998. Model selection and inference. New York: Springer-Verlag, 355 p.). All multivariate ordination analyses were performed in CANOCO 4.5 software (Leps & Smilauer 2003LEPS J & SMILAUER P. 2003. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data using CANOCO. Cambridge: University Press.).

RESULTS

The mean values and range of the levels of fluctuating asymmetry calculated through individual and composite indexes for the six morphological traits of 66 O. ruber caught in GB composed of 13 juveniles and 53 adults, and 14 males and 33 females (i.e. the sexes of nineteen fishes immature, were not determined) (Table I). FA values were more variable for the length of the pectoral fins (LPF) and length of ventral fins (LVF) among morphometric traits, and the number of gill rakers (NGR) among meristic traits (Table I).

Table I
Mean values and range (between parentheses) of the levels of fluctuating asymmetry calculated through individual and composite indexes for the six morphological traits of Orthopristis ruber caught in Guanabara bay. CFA: composite index; NPR: number of pectoral fin rays; NVR: number of ventral fin rays; NGR: number of gill rakers; EYD: eye diameter; LPF: length of pectoral fin; and LVF: length of ventral fin.

It was observed higher mean HSI (PERMANOVA; F=12.95; p=0.002) and GSI PERMANOVA; F=4.02; p=0.05) for adults, whereas higher mean K (PERMANOVA; F=4.79; p=0.04) and RI (PERMANOVA; F=2.19; p=0.011) were recorded for juveniles (Table II). Males exhibited higher mean GSI (PERMANOVA; F=2.88; p=0.09) and females higher mean of RI (PERMANOVA; F=0.14; p=0.071). Males and females did not exhibit significant difference of the K (PERMANOVA; F=0.09; p=0.77) and IHS (PERMANOVA; F=0.009; p=0.94) (Table II).

Table II
Mean values and range (between parentheses) of the physiological indexes calculated for Orthopristis ruber caught in Guanabara Bay. K: condition factor; HSI: hepatosomatic index; GSI: gonadosomatic index; and RI: fullness index. *: significant values (p < 0.05).

The RDA was statistically significant (Monte Carlo test, F=3.1, p=0.05) between the relationship of CFA and physiological descriptors, which were summarized by the two first RDA axes, which explained 98.1% and 100% of the variation, respectively. The first axis separating the adults (n=32) and juveniles (n=8), and showing a stronger relationship of the adults with the GSI and HSI (Fig. 2). However, these descriptors were not affected by the presence of CFA. The second axis revealed an inverse relationship between CFA with K, and RI values (Fig. 2).

Figure 1
The geographic location of Guanabara Bay (Southeastern Brazil), showing the sites where Orthopristis ruber were caught. 1 = Urca region, located near the mouth of Guanabara Bay; 2 = site located over the main circulation channel, near the Rio-Niterói Bridge; 3 = site located near the Paquetá Island, the innermost region of Guanabara Bay undergoing direct influence by the main circulation channel.
Figure 2
Partial Redundancy Analysis (RDA) showing the relationship of fluctuating asymmetry (CFA) with four physiological indexes (GSI, HSI, RI, and K) of adult and juvenile Orthopristis ruber. ⚪ =Urca; =Rio-Niterói Bridge; ⚫ =Paquetá; ▲ = grouping of adults and juveniles.

The RDA of the relationship of the CFA between sexes with the physiological descriptors also was statistically significant (Monte Carlo test; F=7.68; p=0.02). The first axis RDA explained 98.2% of the data variance, but no clear relationship was found between the CFA and sexes (males n =9, and females n=26) (Fig. 3). The second axis showed an inverse relationship between CFA and descriptors K, RI, and HSI, regardless of sex (Fig. 3). With that, AIC was tested between CFA and these three descriptors. The AIC revealed the relationship between CFA (standard error = 23.46) and K (standard error = 0.0012) for males (n=9, non-linear, F=16.46, p=0.006), with an increase of CFA and decreased K (Fig. 4). Thus, FA is interfering with the physiological condition of males. Other relationships with the physiological descriptors between sexes, were not found by GAM.

Figure 3
Partial Redundancy Analysis (RDA) showing the relationship of fluctuating asymmetry (CFA) with four physiological indexes (GSI, HSI, RI, and K) of male and female Orthopristis ruber. ⚪ =Urca; = Rio-Niterói Bridge; ⚫ =Paquetá; Δ= grouping of male and female.
Figure 4
Generalized Additive Model (GAM) selected by Akaike information criterion (AIC) showing the relationship of fluctuating asymmetry (CFA) with condition factor (K) for males of O. ruber.

The physiological indices in juveniles only occurred in the Urca region. GSI, RI, HIS, and GSI in adults, were no significant differences in BG areas (PERMANOVA; F=27; p=0.11).

The physiological indices in females, was no significant difference in BG areas (PERMANOVA; F=1.01; p=0.42), unlike that observed in males (PERMANOVA; F=52.84; p<0.01). GSI, RI, and HSI in males were no statistically significant in BG areas (p>0.50), but K was a significant difference, with higher averages in Urca compared to Paqueta (p<0.01).

Both sexes showed, a proportionally balanced sample in both the dry, and rainy periods with no possibility of the results reflecting seasonality. The number of females analyzed was n=18 in September, and n=15 in December, while the males analyzed were n=6 in September and n=8 in December.

DISCUSSION

Changes in the symmetry of the Orthopristes ruber may be negatively influencing the process of well-being and foraging of the species in Guanabara Bay. Our results are in agreement with the works of Somarakis et al. (1997)SOMARAKIS S, KOSTIKAS I, PERISTERAKI N & TSIMENIDES N. 1997. Fluctuating asymmetry in the otoliths of larval anchovy Engraulis encrasicolus and the use of developmental instability as an indicator of the condition in larval fish. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 51: 191-203. and Ayoade et al. (2004)AYOADE AA, SOWUNMI AA & NWACHUKWU HI. 2004. Gill asymmetry in Labeo ogunensis from Ogun River, Southwest Nigeria. Rev Biol Trop 52: 171-175., where they mention that the effects of stress caused by the environment can cause changes in fitness and alter the homeostasis of the normal development of the species.

Among the physiological descriptors, the condition factor (K) is a qualitative physiological tool pointing out the body condition of the fish and that can be used to compare the health status of the species (Le Cren 1951LE CREN ED. 1951. The length-weight relationship and seasonal cycle in Gonad weight and condition in the perch (Perca fluviatilis). J Anim Ecol 20(2): 201-219.). This index has been used as an additional datum to study reproduction and feeding processes, being possible to relate it to the environmental conditions and behavioral aspects of species (Vazzoler 1996VAZZOLER AEA. 1996. Biologia da reprodução de peixes Teleósteos: Teoria e prática. Maringá: Eduem, 169 p.).

According to Kjerfve et al. (1997)KJERFVE B, RIBEIRO CHA, DIASI GTM, FILIPPO AM & QUARESMA VS. 1997. Oceanographic characteristics of an impacted coastal bay: Baía de Guanabara, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Cont Shelf Res 17: 1609-1643. in the rainy season the higher river-runoff influences the entrance of marine water, thus limiting the extension of the salt wedge. This balance between marine input, regulated by river-runoff, and tide amplitude, results in a characteristic seasonal variation in GB, which presents an extremely wide watershed (Kjerfve et al. 1997KJERFVE B, RIBEIRO CHA, DIASI GTM, FILIPPO AM & QUARESMA VS. 1997. Oceanographic characteristics of an impacted coastal bay: Baía de Guanabara, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Cont Shelf Res 17: 1609-1643.). An increase in runoff in tropical bays enhances the input of sediment, organic matter, heavy metals, organochlorates, and other anthropically originated residuals, thereby increasing the bottom bacterial activity (Baptista et al. 2017BAPTISTA JA, BARRETO CF, VILELA CG, FONSECA EM, MELO GV & BARTH OM. 2017. Environmental change in Guanabara Bay, SE, Brazil, based in microfaunal, pollen, and geochemical proxies in sedimentary cores. Ocean Coast Manage 143: 4-15.). During the process of the carbonic chain are degraded, inducing the consumption of dissolved oxygen, both from the sediment and the water column, resulting in an increase in substrata acidity and a reduction in dissolved oxygen (Gray & Elliot 2009GRAY J & ELLIOTT M. 2009. Ecology of Marine Sediments: From Science to Management. New York: Oxford University Press, 240 p.). These disturbances generate changes in the benthic community structure, and the increase in organic matter deposition and river-originated nutrients occurs by the preceding wet seasons. This suggests the existence of distinct regimes within the GB caused by the seasonality of the rainfall regime which influences the abiotic variables of the bottom water and sediment. In this context, the effect of rainfall and water current seasonality in the drainage basin of GB influence the water, sediment, and, consequently, the fluctuating asymmetry and organosomatic indexes of the O. ruber.

Environmental conditions along with the life strategy of O. ruber may limit the penetration of the species in the inner zones of the GB. In GB, O. ruber is found throughout its length, with a greater amount of external GB jumps in waters with oceanic characteristics and, therefore, has a positive correlation with salinity and transparency (Chaves et al. 2018CHAVES MCN, FRANCO ACS, SEIXAS LB, CRUZ LV & SANTOS LN. 2018. Testing the ecocline concept for fish assemblages along the marine-estuarine gradient in a highly-eutrophic estuary (Guanabara Bay, Brazil). Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 211:118-126.) and with the lowest levels of organic matter (Araújo et al. 2002ARAÚJO FG, AZEVEDO MCC, SILVA MA, PESSANHA ALM, GOMES ID & CRUZ AG. 2002. Environmental influences on the demersal fish assemblages in the Sepetiba Bay, Brazil. Estuaries 25(3): 441-450.). The distribution of O. ruber over the entire length of the GB, among other factors, may be useful with a single influence of the water from the South Atlantic water since the water signals can be perceived up to the internal limit of the distribution of the central channel (Moser et al. 2016MOSER GAO, CASTRO NO, TAKANOHASHI RA, TENENBAUM DR, VARELA-GUERRA J, BARRERA-ALBA JJ & CIOTTI AM. 2016. The influence of surface low-salinity waters and cold subsurface water masses on picoplankton and ultraplankton distribution in the continental shelf of Rio de Janeiro, SE Brazil. Cont Shelf Res 120: 82-95.). In other coastal areas (Sepetiba Bay, RJ), the distribution of O. ruber is preferably restricted to depths of around 50 m, when in the summer months a probable probability of ACAS can also be seen, which comprises a mass of Coastal Water (Vianna & Verani 2002VIANNA M & VERANI JR. 2002. Biologia populacional de Orthopristis ruber (Teleostei, Haemulidae) espécie acompanhante da pesca de arrasto do camarão-rosa, no sudeste brasileiro. Atlântica 23: 27-36., Santos et al. 2007SANTOS ALB, PESSANHA ALM, ARAÚJO FG & COSTA MR. 2007. Condicionantes ambientais na distribuição e no período reprodutivo do Orthopristis ruber (Cuvier) (Teleostei, Haemulidae) na baía de Sepetiba, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Rev Bras Zool 24(4): 1017-1024.). The restriction of O. ruber at the entrance to Sepetiba Bay may also be conditioned by interspecific competitions by territories (Vianna & Verani 2002VIANNA M & VERANI JR. 2002. Biologia populacional de Orthopristis ruber (Teleostei, Haemulidae) espécie acompanhante da pesca de arrasto do camarão-rosa, no sudeste brasileiro. Atlântica 23: 27-36.), an unproven standard for statistics in GB, where a species is distributed across all rock costs (Chaves et al. 2018CHAVES MCN, FRANCO ACS, SEIXAS LB, CRUZ LV & SANTOS LN. 2018. Testing the ecocline concept for fish assemblages along the marine-estuarine gradient in a highly-eutrophic estuary (Guanabara Bay, Brazil). Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 211:118-126.). This agonistic behavioral pattern is widely reported for other rocky shore species, corroborating benefit theory in area defense (Ceccarelli et al. 2001CECCARELLI DM, JONES GP & MCCOOK LJ. 2001. Territorial damselfish as determinants of the structure of benthic communities on coral reefs. Oceanogr Mar Biol 39: 355-389.).

The condition factor (K) provides important information about the physiological state of the fish, assuming that individuals with greater body mass in a given length are in better physiological conditions (Vazzoler 1996VAZZOLER AEA. 1996. Biologia da reprodução de peixes Teleósteos: Teoria e prática. Maringá: Eduem, 169 p.). However, K can be influenced by age, since younger fish have different foraging rates and metabolic activity associated with rapid growth relative to older fish, being able to present higher conditions than the latter (Pyle et al. 2005PYLE GG, RAJOTTE JW & COUTURE P. 2005. Effects of industrial metal on wild fish populations along a metal contamination gradient. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety 61: 287-312.), which explains in the present study the highest values of K observed in juveniles (Table II).

The subtle tendency observed in the inverse relationship of CFA with RI can be a strong indication that the asymmetry may be compromising the food function and integrity of the organism in food consumption, protein, and glycogen storage, and maybe insufficient to guarantee the body condition and the body mass of O. ruber in GB. The energy reserve affected by the asymmetry may reflect low energy stock, entailed by loss of appetite or excessive use of energy resources to compensate for the detoxification mechanisms (Ramirez et al. 2012RAMIREZ R, RAMÍREZ GL, GONZÁLEZ-SANSÓN G, ROJO-VÁZQUEZ JA & ARELLANO-MARTÍNEZ M. 2012. Biología reproductiva de Anisotremus interruptus (Perciformes: Haemulidae) en el Pacífico central mexicano Salvador. Rev Biol Trop 60: 709-720.). This explains the increase of asymmetry in males resulting in a decrease of K, indicating their difficulty in maintaining the body condition, more than females (Fig. 4). Probably, the morphological alteration in males is interfering in the intraspecific interactions that occur with O. ruber. Possibly, when males cannot satisfactorily maintain their territorial physical space and end up compromising their foraging actively, which explains their lower RI (McFarland & Hilis 1982MCFARLAND WN & HILIS ZM. 1982. Observations on agonistic behavior between members of juvenile French and white grunts, Family Haemulidae. Bull Mar Sci 32: 255-268.). Thus, the differentiated RI between the sexes indicates a greater energetic need by the females, with a better alimentary condition. The foraging strategy is in line with the reproductive strategy, reflecting that the intensity of feeding activity is the period preceding spawning, which may have occurred with O. ruber in the GB in the present study when the reproductive period for Haemulidae occurs at the end of spring and summer seasons (Garcia et al. 2010GARCIA J, MENDES LF, SAMPAIO CLS & LINS JE. 2010. Biodiversidade Marinha da Bacia Potiguar: Ictiofauna. Rio de Janeiro: Museu Nacional, 195 p.). Male K was higher in Urca, less impacted area than in Paqueta, more degraded area. However, when we exclude the Paqueta samples and make the relationship of K with CFA in males, we observe the same trend that K decreases with increasing CFA.

The highest values of HSI in adults of O. ruber may be related to the lowest K and highest GSI, reflecting that the liver is working positively in the mobilization of reserves to synthesize sex hormones (Querol et al. 2002QUEROL MVM, QUEROL E & GOMES NNA. 2002. Fator de condição gonadal, índice hepatossomático e recrutamento como indicadores do período de reprodução de Loricariichthys platymetopon (Osteichthyes, Loricariidae), bacia do rio Uruguai médio, Sul do Brasil. Iheringia Ser Zool 92: 79-84.) and responding negatively to variations in foraging. However, higher values of asymmetry with lower HSI values indicate that morphological changes are affecting the energy reserve and metabolic activity of the liver of this species.

Fluctuating asymmetry did not affect the reproductive success of O. ruber, despite the presence of a series of contaminants (Kehrig et al. 2010KEHRIG HA, SEIXAS TG, BAÊTA AP, MALM O & MOREIRA I. 2010. Inorganic and methylmercury: Do they transfer along with a tropical coastal food web? Mar Pollut Bull 60: 2350-2356., Soares-Gomes et al. 2016SOARES-GOMES A, DA GAMA BAP, BAPTISTA NETO JA, FREIRE DG, CORDEIRO RC, MACHADO W, BERNARDES MC, COUTINHO R, THOMPSON FL & PEREIRA RC. 2016. An environmental overview of Guanabara Bay, Rio de Janeiro. Reg Stud Mar Sci 8: 319-330., Baptista et al. 2017BAPTISTA JA, BARRETO CF, VILELA CG, FONSECA EM, MELO GV & BARTH OM. 2017. Environmental change in Guanabara Bay, SE, Brazil, based in microfaunal, pollen, and geochemical proxies in sedimentary cores. Ocean Coast Manage 143: 4-15.) contributing to aggravate the process of environmental degradation of the GB ecosystem and may negatively affect the reproductive process of fish. Other species such as Cyprinodon pecosensis (Kodric 1997KODRIC A. 1997. Sexual selection, stabilizing selection, and fluctuating asymmetry in two populations of pupfish (Cyprinodon pecosensis). Biol J Linn Soc Lond 62: 553-566.), guppies (Sheridan & Pomiankowski 1997SHERIDAN L & POMIANKOWSKI A. 1997. Fluctuating asymmetry, spot asymmetry, and inbreeding depression in the sexual coloration of male guppy fish. Heredity 79: 515-523.), Salaria pavo (Risso 1810) (Gonçalves et al. 2005GONÇALVES DM, SIMÕES PC, CHUMBINHO AC, CORREIA MJ, FAGUNDES T & OLIVEIRA RF. 2005. Fluctuating asymmetries and reproductive success in the peacock blenny. J Fish Biol 60: 810-820.), Perca fluviatilis (Linnaeus 1758) (Oxnevad et al. 2002OXNEVAD SA, HEIBO E & VOLLESTAD LA. 2002. Is there a relationship between fluctuating asymmetry and reproductive investment in perch (Perca fluviatilis)? Can J Zool 80: 120-125.), Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus 1758) (Budi et al. 2017BUDI DS, LUTFIYAH L & TRIASTUTI RJ. 2017. Fluctuating Asymmetry of Red Strain of Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in Genteng Fish Hatchery Center, Banyuwangi. Omni-Akuatika 13(1): 1-4.) and Pimephales notatus (Rafinesque 1820) (Simon & Burskey 2016SIMON TP & BURSKEY JL. 2016. Deformity, Erosion, Lesion, and Tumor Occurrence, Fluctuating Asymmetry, and Population Parameters for Bluntnose Minnow (Pimephales notatus) as Indicators of Recovering Water Quality in a Great Lakes Area of Concern, USA. Arch Environ Con Tox 70: 181-191.) and Lajus et al. (2019)LAJUS D, GOLOVIN PV, YURTSEVA AO, IVANOVA TS, DORGHAM AS & IVANOV MV. 2019. Fluctuating asymmetry as an indicator of stress and fitness in stickleback: a review of the literature and examination of cranial structures. Evol Ecol Res 20: 83-106., also exhibited that the presence of fluctuating asymmetry did not affect the reproductive success, and/or the GSI of these species.

In short, the descriptors K, RI, and HSI were subtly affected by the fluctuating asymmetry. This is possibly due to diverse environmental conditions and/or biotic and genetic stressors that negatively influenced the fitness of the species. There is no direct relationship between the asymmetry of juveniles and adults, but the asymmetry negatively interferes with the physiological condition of O. ruber males, indicating their difficulty in keeping K higher than females (Table II). Thus, fluctuating asymmetry can be considered an effective tool to infer the understanding of the instability of O. ruber development in GB, which makes this species a possible indicator of environmental quality in this ecosystem.

This work stands out for being a pioneer in the comparative analysis of the CFA with different physiological descriptors indicators of fitness using a tropical marine species. The results corroborate that CFA can be considered an effective tool to diagnose small bilateral differences in O. ruber inferring about the understanding of the instability of the development and the body condition of the species in the GB.

Our results corroborate the hypothesis proposed in the paper, showed that the physiological descriptors K, RI, and HSI of O. ruber were subtly affected by CFA, with differences between life stages and sexes. Some issues, however, still need to be raised, such as the time at which CFA is determined during the development of the species, and whether the bilateral deviations are corrected during growth, or if there is a natural variation of the species, to better understand the biology of the species and how it responds to possible stressors.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the Graduate Course in Ocean and Earth Dynamics (DOT-UFF), Laboratory of Theoretical and Applied Ichthyology (LICTA-UNIRIO), and Laboratory of Applied Ecology (UFF) for providing the logistic support. This work was supported by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, Programa PELD), and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES).

REFERENCES

  • ARAÚJO FG, AZEVEDO MCC, SILVA MA, PESSANHA ALM, GOMES ID & CRUZ AG. 2002. Environmental influences on the demersal fish assemblages in the Sepetiba Bay, Brazil. Estuaries 25(3): 441-450.
  • AYOADE AA, SOWUNMI AA & NWACHUKWU HI. 2004. Gill asymmetry in Labeo ogunensis from Ogun River, Southwest Nigeria. Rev Biol Trop 52: 171-175.
  • BAKKER TCM, MAZZI D & KRAAK SBM. 2006. Broods of attractive three-spined stickleback males require greater paternal care. J Fish Biol 69: 1164-1177.
  • BAPTISTA JA, BARRETO CF, VILELA CG, FONSECA EM, MELO GV & BARTH OM. 2017. Environmental change in Guanabara Bay, SE, Brazil, based in microfaunal, pollen, and geochemical proxies in sedimentary cores. Ocean Coast Manage 143: 4-15.
  • BARTON BA, MORGAN JD & VIJAYAN MM. 2002. Physiological and condition-related indicators of environmental stress in fish. In: Adams SM (Ed), Biological Indicators of Aquatic Ecosystem Stress. American Fisheries Society, p. 111-148.
  • BUDI DS, LUTFIYAH L & TRIASTUTI RJ. 2017. Fluctuating Asymmetry of Red Strain of Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in Genteng Fish Hatchery Center, Banyuwangi. Omni-Akuatika 13(1): 1-4.
  • BURNHAM KP & ANDERSON DR. 1998. Model selection and inference. New York: Springer-Verlag, 355 p.
  • CASTRO MS, BONECKER ACT & VALENTIN JL. 2005. Seasonal variation in fish larvae at the entrance of Guanabara Bay. Brazil. Braz Arch Biol Technol 48: 121-128.
  • CECCARELLI DM, JONES GP & MCCOOK LJ. 2001. Territorial damselfish as determinants of the structure of benthic communities on coral reefs. Oceanogr Mar Biol 39: 355-389.
  • CHAVES MCN, FRANCO ACS, SEIXAS LB, CRUZ LV & SANTOS LN. 2018. Testing the ecocline concept for fish assemblages along the marine-estuarine gradient in a highly-eutrophic estuary (Guanabara Bay, Brazil). Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 211:118-126.
  • FISTAROL GO ET AL. 2015. Environmental and Sanitary Conditions of Guanabara Bay, Rio de Janeiro. Front Microbiol 6: 1-17.
  • FRANCO ACS, RAMOS CHAVES MCN, CASTEL-BRANCO MPB & SANTOS LN. 2016. Responses of fish assemblages of sandy beaches to different anthropogenic and hydrodynamic influences. J Fish Biol 89: 921-938.
  • GARCIA J, MENDES LF, SAMPAIO CLS & LINS JE. 2010. Biodiversidade Marinha da Bacia Potiguar: Ictiofauna. Rio de Janeiro: Museu Nacional, 195 p.
  • GONÇALVES DM, SIMÕES PC, CHUMBINHO AC, CORREIA MJ, FAGUNDES T & OLIVEIRA RF. 2005. Fluctuating asymmetries and reproductive success in the peacock blenny. J Fish Biol 60: 810-820.
  • GRAY J & ELLIOTT M. 2009. Ecology of Marine Sediments: From Science to Management. New York: Oxford University Press, 240 p.
  • HAMMER O, HARPER DA & RYAN P. 2001. Past: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeont Elect.
  • HECHTER RP, MOODIE PF & MOODIE GEE. 2000. Pectoral fin asymmetry, dimorphism, and fecundity in the brook stickleback, Culaea inconstans. Behavior 137: 999-1009.
  • HYSLOP EJ. 1980. Stomach content analysis: a review of methods and their applications. J Fish Biol 17: 411-429.
  • IBGE. 2017. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Atlas do censo demográfico 2010, Rio de Janeiro.
  • KEHRIG HA, SEIXAS TG, BAÊTA AP, MALM O & MOREIRA I. 2010. Inorganic and methylmercury: Do they transfer along with a tropical coastal food web? Mar Pollut Bull 60: 2350-2356.
  • KJERFVE B, RIBEIRO CHA, DIASI GTM, FILIPPO AM & QUARESMA VS. 1997. Oceanographic characteristics of an impacted coastal bay: Baía de Guanabara, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Cont Shelf Res 17: 1609-1643.
  • KODRIC A. 1997. Sexual selection, stabilizing selection, and fluctuating asymmetry in two populations of pupfish (Cyprinodon pecosensis). Biol J Linn Soc Lond 62: 553-566.
  • LAJUS D, YURTSEVA A, BIRCH G & BOOTH DJ. 2015. Fluctuating asymmetry as a pollution monitor: The Australian estuarine smooth toadfish Tetractenos glaber (Teleostei: Tetraodontidae). Mar Pollut Bull 101: 758-767.
  • LAJUS D, GOLOVIN PV, YURTSEVA AO, IVANOVA TS, DORGHAM AS & IVANOV MV. 2019. Fluctuating asymmetry as an indicator of stress and fitness in stickleback: a review of the literature and examination of cranial structures. Evol Ecol Res 20: 83-106.
  • LE CREN ED. 1951. The length-weight relationship and seasonal cycle in Gonad weight and condition in the perch (Perca fluviatilis). J Anim Ecol 20(2): 201-219.
  • LEPS J & SMILAUER P. 2003. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data using CANOCO. Cambridge: University Press.
  • LEUNG B, FORBES MR & HOULE D. 2000. Fluctuating asymmetry as a bioindicator of stress: comparing the efficacy of analyses involving multiple traits. Am Nat 155: 101-115.
  • MCFARLAND WN & HILIS ZM. 1982. Observations on agonistic behavior between members of juvenile French and white grunts, Family Haemulidae. Bull Mar Sci 32: 255-268.
  • MOSER GAO, CASTRO NO, TAKANOHASHI RA, TENENBAUM DR, VARELA-GUERRA J, BARRERA-ALBA JJ & CIOTTI AM. 2016. The influence of surface low-salinity waters and cold subsurface water masses on picoplankton and ultraplankton distribution in the continental shelf of Rio de Janeiro, SE Brazil. Cont Shelf Res 120: 82-95.
  • OXNEVAD SA, HEIBO E & VOLLESTAD LA. 2002. Is there a relationship between fluctuating asymmetry and reproductive investment in perch (Perca fluviatilis)? Can J Zool 80: 120-125.
  • PALMER AR. 1994. Fluctuating asymmetry analyses: A primer. In: Markow TA (Ed), Developmental Instability: Its Origins and Evolutionary Implications. Kluwer: Dordrecht, p. 335-364.
  • PALMER R & STROBECK C. 1986. Fluctuating asymmetry: measurement, analysis, patterns. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 17: 391-421.
  • PALMER AR & STROBECK C. 2003. Fluctuating asymmetry analyses revisited. In: Polak M (Ed), Developmental Instability (DI): Causes and Consequences. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, p. 279-319.
  • PYLE GG, RAJOTTE JW & COUTURE P. 2005. Effects of industrial metal on wild fish populations along a metal contamination gradient. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety 61: 287-312.
  • QUEROL MVM, QUEROL E & GOMES NNA. 2002. Fator de condição gonadal, índice hepatossomático e recrutamento como indicadores do período de reprodução de Loricariichthys platymetopon (Osteichthyes, Loricariidae), bacia do rio Uruguai médio, Sul do Brasil. Iheringia Ser Zool 92: 79-84.
  • RAMIREZ R, RAMÍREZ GL, GONZÁLEZ-SANSÓN G, ROJO-VÁZQUEZ JA & ARELLANO-MARTÍNEZ M. 2012. Biología reproductiva de Anisotremus interruptus (Perciformes: Haemulidae) en el Pacífico central mexicano Salvador. Rev Biol Trop 60: 709-720.
  • SANTOS ALB, PESSANHA ALM, ARAÚJO FG & COSTA MR. 2007. Condicionantes ambientais na distribuição e no período reprodutivo do Orthopristis ruber (Cuvier) (Teleostei, Haemulidae) na baía de Sepetiba, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Rev Bras Zool 24(4): 1017-1024.
  • SEIXAS LB, SANTOS AFGN & SANTOS LN. 2016. Fluctuating asymmetry: a tool for an impact assessment on fish populations in a tropical polluted bay, Brazilian. Ecol. Indic 71: 522-532.
  • SHERIDAN L & POMIANKOWSKI A. 1997. Fluctuating asymmetry, spot asymmetry, and inbreeding depression in the sexual coloration of male guppy fish. Heredity 79: 515-523.
  • SILVEIRA AEF, NASCIMENTO JR, SANTOS ES & BIDONE ED. 2017. Screening-level risk assessment applied to dredging of polluted sediments from Guanabara Bay, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Mar Pollut Bull 118: 368-375.
  • SIMON TP & BURSKEY JL. 2016. Deformity, Erosion, Lesion, and Tumor Occurrence, Fluctuating Asymmetry, and Population Parameters for Bluntnose Minnow (Pimephales notatus) as Indicators of Recovering Water Quality in a Great Lakes Area of Concern, USA. Arch Environ Con Tox 70: 181-191.
  • SOARES-GOMES A, DA GAMA BAP, BAPTISTA NETO JA, FREIRE DG, CORDEIRO RC, MACHADO W, BERNARDES MC, COUTINHO R, THOMPSON FL & PEREIRA RC. 2016. An environmental overview of Guanabara Bay, Rio de Janeiro. Reg Stud Mar Sci 8: 319-330.
  • SOMARAKIS S, KOSTIKAS I, PERISTERAKI N & TSIMENIDES N. 1997. Fluctuating asymmetry in the otoliths of larval anchovy Engraulis encrasicolus and the use of developmental instability as an indicator of the condition in larval fish. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 51: 191-203.
  • SOPINKA NM, DONALDSON MR, O’CONNOR CM, SUSKI CD & COOKE SJ. 2017. Stress Indicators in Fish. London: Academic Press.
  • SOUZA JS, SANTOS LN & SANTOS AFGN. 2018. Habitat features, not water variables explain most of the fish assemblages’ use of sandy beaches in a Brazilian eutrophic bay. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 211: 100-109.
  • VAN VALLEN L. 1962. A study of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution 16: 125-142.
  • VAZZOLER AEA. 1996. Biologia da reprodução de peixes Teleósteos: Teoria e prática. Maringá: Eduem, 169 p.
  • VIANNA M & VERANI JR. 2002. Biologia populacional de Orthopristis ruber (Teleostei, Haemulidae) espécie acompanhante da pesca de arrasto do camarão-rosa, no sudeste brasileiro. Atlântica 23: 27-36.
  • VIANNA M, ANDRADE-TUBINO MF, KEUNECKE KA, ANDRADE AC, SILVA DR & PADULA V. 2012. Estado atual de conhecimento sobre a ictiofauna. In: Meniconi et al. (Eds), Baía de Guanabara. Síntese do Conhecimento Ambiental. Vol. II. Biodiversidade. Rio de Janeiro: Petrobras.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    26 Nov 2021
  • Date of issue
    2021

History

  • Received
    26 Apr 2021
  • Accepted
    2 Sept 2021
Academia Brasileira de Ciências Rua Anfilófio de Carvalho, 29, 3º andar, 20030-060 Rio de Janeiro RJ Brasil, Tel: +55 21 3907-8100 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil
E-mail: aabc@abc.org.br