In vitro and in silico assessment of cytotoxicity and chromosome instability induced by saxitoxin in human derived neural cell line

Abstract

In freshwater, saxitoxins (STX) are produced by different cyanobacteria genera, including Raphidiopsis. Data regarding cytogenotoxicity effects of STX on human cells are scarse, this merit further studies of its toxicology. This study assessed the cytotoxicity and the chromosome instability of STX on SHSY-5Y human cell line. The CBMN assay allows the detection of chromosome breaks and abnormal chromosomal segregation. Additionally, in silico systems biology approach, used to search for known and predicted interaction networks, was applied to study the interactions between STX and SHSY-5Y cellular components. The results of the CBMN assay demonstrated that STX concentrations of 2.5 – 10 µg/L induced cytostasis and chromosome instability in a dose-response relationship. Apoptosis was detected after exposure of SHSY-5Y cultured cells to STX concentration of 10 µg/L. The results of the systems biology analysis revealed the interaction of STX with proteins related with acetylcoline pathway, cell cycle regulation and apoptosis. Furthermore, combining the in vitro and in silico approachs, it was possible to suggest a mechanism of action of STX in SHSY-5Y cells. Overall, the data demonstrated the cytotoxicity and mutagenicity of environmentally relevant concentrations of STX. These results should be considered when setting up guidelines for monitoring STX in water supply.

Key words
STX, micronucleus; cytostasis; apoptosis; systems biology

INTRODUCTION

The contamination of water resources from human activities, such as domestic and industrial sewage discharges, has accelerated the process of artificial eutrophication in supply waters. Eutrophication, mainly due to excessive input of phosphorus and nitrogen, causes changes in water quality. In this sense, the reduction of dissolved oxygen, decrease in biodiversity, aesthetic deterioration of the environment, fish death and increased occurrence of cyanobacteria and microalgae blooms stand out, with negative consequences on the efficiency and cost of water treatment, when it comes to public supply source (Su et al. 2016, Glibert 2017, Ho et al. 2019).

Cyanotoxins are metabolites synthesized by cyanobacteria that can affect aquatic biota, resulting in toxic effects also in terrestrial mammals (Sivonen & Jones 1999, Buratti et al. 2017). Human exposure to cyanotoxins, in general, can occur through primary contact with water containing the toxins, by inhalation, oral drinking and intravenous (in the treatment of hemodialysis) and by marine and freshwater food such as fish, crustacea and mollusks, that have been in contact with cyanobacteria, accumulating toxins in their tissues (Drobac et al. 2013, Calado et al. 2020, Nielsen & Jiang 2020).

Raphidiopsis raciborskii produces extremely aggressive toxins that can cause both human health problems and damage to the environment. Its high competitiveness in eutrophic environments, combined with its ability to form toxic blooms in nitrogen and phosphorus limited waters (Miotto et al. 2017) make this species one of the most studied cyanobacteria from both an ecological and public health point of view. There are two well-known toxins, cylindrospermopsin, an alkaloid with action on the liver and kidneys, and saxitoxin (STX), also known as PSP (Paralytic Shellfish Poisons), which acts on the neuromuscular system (Pratheepa & Vasconcelos 2017, Yang et al. 2021). Regarding STX, most toxicological data was obtained with STX produced by marine organisms as dinoflagelates (Cusick & Sayler 2013) and little information is available for those produced by freshwater cyanobacteria.

The use of a nervous tissue cell line (SH-SY5Y), with the potential to differentiate into cells with a phenotype similar to mature neurons, may be a suitable model to assess the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of STX (Xicoy et al. 2017). Additionally, the in vitro micronucleus test, which was used in this study, is regulated by OECD guideline 487, and the advancement of mammalian cell culture technologies makes it possible to more accurately assess the consequences of human exposure to these toxins, especially, at the DNA level. In addition, systems biology, through interaction networks, can help in understanding the interactions between environmental compounds, such as cyanotoxins, and cellular components, prospecting molecular pathways. The characteristic of network modeling is the analysis of cells in terms of their underlying network structure at many different levels of detail (Xia 2010).

The purpose of this study was to apply the cytokinesis-block micronucleus cytome (CBMN-Cyt) assay alongside with in silico tools to assess the cytotoxic and genotoxic profile of STX synthetized from a Raphidiopsis raciborskii culture. Combining in vitro and in silico methodologies could shed more light on the mechanisms of action underlying the cytogenotoxicity of STX in environmentally relevant concentrations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Source of Saxitoxin (STX)

The strain used in the experiment was Raphidopsis raciborskii (T-3), formelly belonging to the genus Cylindrospermopsis. Saxitoxins extracts were obtained from 150 mL cultures of Raphidiopsis raciborskii cells from the Culture Collection of the Laboratory of Cyanobacteria and Phycotoxins (LCF). Filaments were grown in ASM-1 medium (Gorham et al. 1964) at 25 ± 1°C under 12hs:12hs; dark/white cycles provided by fluorescent light (intensity: 127 µE m^-2 s^-1). STX concentration in filaments were detected by HPLC– FLD and analyzed and compared with the commercial standards of STX variants (NRC, Canada). For extraction of toxins, filaments of R. raciborskii were centrifuged at 10,000 x g at 4 °C during 10 min and the debris resuspend in a 10 mL of 0.05M HCL. This suspension was then sonicated (three cycles of 1 min each) in order to break the cellular walls and release the toxins. This acid extract was then filtered through a cellulose acetate membrane and the remaining solution containing saxitoxins was quantified by HPLC. The method used followed the protocol described by Rourke et al. (2008). In this investigation we assessed environmentally relevant concentrations of STX, based on the Brazilian Ministry of Health (Regulation number 2914/2011).

Cell line and culture conditions

Neural SH-SY5Y human derived cell line was kindly provided by Dr. Juliana da Silva from laboratory o Genetic Toxicology of Ulbra-Brazil. SH-SY5Y cells were maintained as a monolayer in 75 cm² flasks in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM, Gibco®, Waltham, MA), supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco®, Waltham, MA) and antibiotics (1% of penicillin/streptomycin solution and 0.1% of gentamycin solution) (Gibco®, Waltham, MA), and kept in a humidified 5% CO₂ atmosphere at a temperature of 37 ºC until confluence was reached. SH-SY5Y cells were seeded at a density of 1 × 10⁴ into 24-well plates and cultured for 24 h.

CBMN-Cytome (Cyt) assay

The CBMN-Cyt assay was carried out as recommended by Fenech (2007) with modifications. After incubation, cells were treated with different concentrations (1.25 – 10 μg/L) of Raphidiopsis extracts containing saxitoxin variants as well as negative control (0.05M HCL) and positive control (bleomycin 3 µg/mL) for 24 h of treatment. After treatment, SH-SY5Y cells were washed twice in Dulbecco’s phosphate saline buffered (DPBS, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and cytochalasin B (Cyt B; CAS 14930–96–2; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), was added to a final concentration of 3 µg/ml in complete fresh medium.

After two cell cycles, Cyt B was removed and the cells were collected and harvested by cytocentrifugation (Cientec, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil); 160 µL of cell suspension was transferred to cytocentrifuge cups and centrifuged for 5 min at 700 rpm to produce 1 spot per slide. Slides with the cells were stained with Instant Prov (Newprov, Pinhais, PR, Brazil). After staining, slides were air-dried and examined under 400x magnifications using a light microscope. Two independent experiments, in duplicate, were performed.

The cytotoxicity of STX was assessed by means of the cytokinesis-block proliferation index (CBPI) (cytostatic effect) as well as the analysis of apoptotic and necrotic cells (cell death). CBPI was estimated by scoring 500 cells with one to four nuclei and was calculated using the formula [M1+2(M2)+3(M3)+4(M4)]/500, where M1 - M4 represent the number of cells with one to four nuclei, respectively. The cytostasis per- centage was calculated using the formula 100 – 100 {(CBPI_T – 1)/(CBPI_C – 1)}, where CBPI_T represents the mean CBPI of each concentration used in the treatment of culture and CBPI_C represents the mean CBPI of the control culture (OECD 2016). Apoptotic and necrotic cells were estimated by scoring 500 cells. The parameters of chromosomal instability — micronuclei (MNi), nuclear buds (NBUDs) and nucleoplasmic bridges (NPBs) — were counted in 1000 binucleated cells (BNC) per experimental point and were scored according to Fenech (2007).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) software, version 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Normality was evaluated with the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and homogeneity of variance was evaluated with the Levene’s test. Since NBUDs values were not normally distributed, even after data transformation, the non-parametric Mann–Whitney U test with p<0.05 was used to quantitatively determine the difference between negative control and treated groups. For the DNA damage, CBPI, MNi and NPBs values, analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test) was used to compare treated groups with the negative control. The results were expressed as means and standard deviations (±SD) or percentages.

System biology analysis

The constructing of the compound protein network for systems biology analysis uses an opensource database, based on experimentation and research findings. However, the information obtained in this way, data without processing, reflect non-specific findings, needing refinement. To develop a relation between the most relevant proteins for the SH-SY5Y cell line, we selected 777 overexpressed proteins, obtained from the Oxford database (Rouillard et al. 2016). We selected these proteins due to the understanding that overexpression can be related to the high degree of interaction between one node and another and correlate with an in silico model. The networks corresponding to the proteins were obtained by the online chemical interaction search software STITCH 5.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2016) and the protein interaction search tool STRING 10.5 (Szklarczyk et al. 2019), both following the parameters of Minimum required interaction score 0,400; Max number of interactors to show on the first shell 20; Max number of interactors to show on the Second shell 5 and Active interaction sources of experiments, databases, co-expression, neighborhood. We modeled the interaction networks in order to incorporate the desired proteins and compounds by the fusion tool present in Cytoscape 3.8 (Shannon et al. 2013), to allow the analysis of complex regions by the application “complex molecular detection” (MCODE 1.5), which evaluates the network as a function of regions with a high degree of connectivity to each other, forming complexes of functional nodes called clusters and that may be associated with biological process (Deng et al. 2019, Bader & Hogue 2003). With all the information obtained and properly exported to Cytoscape, the individual networks were merged, overlaying the common interactions, creating a Compound protein interaction network. The degree of functional enrichment for a given cluster and category was quantitatively computed (P value) by hypergeometric distribution, and multiple test correction was also assessed by applying the false discovery rate (FDR) algorithm (Benjamini & Hochberg 1995) which was fully implemented using the BiNGO software with a significance level of P < 0.05.

Centralities implemented were degree and betweeness to undirected networks, nodes with a relatively higher degree were termed hubs, and nodes with higher betweenness were named bottlenecks. Hub nodes interact with many other nodes in the network, and thus often occupy central positions in the network. By contrast, a bottleneck node does not necessarily have many interactions, but it has a high degree of betweenness centrality, meaning that it will often be a linker between different clusters (Barabási & Oltvai 2004, Yu et al. 2007). Therefore, a node hub-bottleneck N-HB can be considered a key regulator of biological processes and essential for the successful transfer of information through the network, where N-HB perturbations are more likely to cause network fragmentation.

RESULTS

In vitro cytotoxicity and chromosome instability

Considering cell death, STX (10 μg/L) significantly increased the frequency of apoptotic cells in relation to the negative control (Figure 1). None of STX treatments were able to significantly enhance the frequencies of necrotic cells. Additionally, the mitotic status was evaluated with the cytokinesis-block proliferation index (CBPI). CBPI was significantly reduced after exposure of SH-SY5Y cells to STX concentrations of 2.5, 5 and 10 μg/L, whereas the percentage of cytostasis was about 13, 15 and 26% at STX concentrations of 2.5, 5 and 10 μg/L, respectively (Figure 2).

Figure 1
Effects of STX on the induction of apoptotic and necrotic cells. Cultured SHSY-5Y cells were exposed to different concentrations (1.25 – 10 µg/L) of STX for 24 h. **Significantly different from the negative control (NC) (p < 0.01). PC: positive control (Bleomycin 3 µg/mL).

Figure 2
Effects of STX on the cytokinesis-block proliferation index (CBPI) and cytostasis (% of inhibition). Cultured SHSY-5Y cells were exposed to different concentrations (1.25 – 10 µg/L) of STX for 24 h. *Significantly different from the negative control (p < 0.05). **Significantly different from the negative control (p < 0.01) **Significantly different from the negative control (p < 0.001) (one-way ANOVA; Dunnett’s multiple comparison test). NC: Negative control. PC: positive control (Bleomycin 3 µg/mL).

We next investigated the effects of STX on markers of chromosomal instability (Figure 3). STX significantly increased the frequencies of MNi and NBUDs at the concentrations of 2.5, 5 and 10 μg/L. None of the tested concentrations were able to significantly increase the frequencies of NPBs in comparison with the negative control group.

Figure 3
Effects of STX on the frequencies of a) MNi: micronuclei; b) NPBs: nucleoplasmic bridges and c) NBUDs: nuclear buds. Cultured SHSY-5Y cells were exposed to different concentrations (1.25 – 10 µg/L) of STX for 24 h. NC: Negative control. PC: positive control (Bleomycin 3 µg/mL). Significantly different from the negative control group *p<0.05; ** p<0.01; *** p<0.001.

In silico analysis of STX integration to SH-SY5Y protein model

The compilation of 777 individual protein networks, fused into a single network, produced the protein-protein interactions (PPI) network, with 814 nodes and 4114 interactions. The PPI is a complex network, divided into two regions that do not interact with each other, because they have different final biological functions.

The “a” macroregion of PPI is divided into broad biological functions, such as cell cycle maintenance, chromosomal regulation, cell division, cytosolic organization, cytoskeleton structuring and processes related to DNA transcription and translation. The “b” macroregion is more specific for RNA-related processes such as RNA transcription by polymerase II, RNA metabolic processes (general), gene expression, regulation of nucleoside organization. After introducing the STX isolated network into the PPI, the nodes are rearranged, increasing its complexity and changing its global topology into a compound - protein interaction network (Figure S1 - Supplementary Material).

Modularity analyses afforded to visualize ten clusters above the cutoff score (data not shown). Next, gene ontology analysis was carried out for all clusters, and identified the biological processes associated to these proteins’ modules (Table I). Cluster 1 had the highest score, presenting key biological processes such as: RNA processing, spliceosome assembly and ribonucleoprotein complex biogenesis.

Table I
Specific gene ontology classes derived from protein-protein interactions within compound-protein interaction (CPI).

Cluster	GO-ID	Corrected p Value	Description
1	375	3,71E-19	RNA splicing, esterification reactions
	377	2,67E-16	RNA splicing, transesterification reactions with bulged adenosine as nucleophile
	398	2,67E-16	nuclear mRNA splicing, via spliceosome
	8380	2,58E-14	RNA splicing
	6397	2,11E-12	mRNA processing
	6396	3,08E-10	RNA processing
	22613	4,25E-07	ribonucleoprotein complex biogenesis
	245	2,96E-06	spliceosome assembly
2	7269	1,54E+01	neurotransmitter secretion
	1505	2,96E+01	regulation of neurotransmitter levels
	23061	2,96E+01	signal release
	7268	4,54E+01	synaptic transmission
	50807	4,54E+01	regulation of synapse organization
4	6120	1,43E-24	mitochondrial electron transport, NADH to ubiquinone
	42773	2,20E-23	ATP synthesis coupled electron transport
	42775	2,20E-23	mitochondrial ATP synthesis coupled electron transport
	55114	3,24E-13	oxidation reduction
	16310	8,63E-10	phosphorylation
5	7399	7,11E+01	nervous system development
	48699	1,60E+02	generation of neurons
	22008	1,60E+02	neurogenesis
	30182	3,75E+02	neuron differentiation
7	31124	8,49E-06	mRNA 3’-end processing
	6378	9,11E-05	mRNA polyadenylation
	6379	9,11E-05	mRNA cleavage
	6139	2,89E-03	nucleobase, nucleoside, nucleotide and nucleic acid metabolic process
8	9755	3,38E-04	hormone-mediated signaling pathway
	6887	1,09E-03	exocytosis
	32870	2,50E-01	cellular response to hormone stimulus
	6397	7,96E-01	mRNA processing
9	398	7,89E-07	nuclear mRNA splicing, via spliceosome
	10467	1,73E-05	gene expression
10	8154	1,72E-01	actin polymerization or depolymerization
	7010	1,71E+02	cytoskeleton organization
11	23033	1,15E+02	signaling pathway
12	42246	1,27E+00	tissue regeneration
	42060	1,73E+00	wound healing
	31099	3,69E+00	regeneration
	7399	2,05E+01	nervous system development
	50767	2,05E+01	regulation of neurogenesis
13	50804	1,39E+00	regulation of synaptic transmission
	31644	1,85E+00	regulation of neurological system process
	42416	4,09E+00	dopamine biosynthetic process
	61024	1,28E+01	membrane organization

• Clusters 5 and 10 correspond to macro-region “b” and have not changed with the introduction of STX in the PPI network. Clusters 3 and 6 do not have ontological representation as the connections did not result in biological activity.

The presence of STX in compound-protein interaction network, in module 13, presents ontologies of neural membrane organization, synapse regulation and processes related to neuronal organization. The proximity relationship between modules 12 and 13 demonstrates the indirect interaction of STX in compound-protein interaction network. In module 12, the main ontologies are wound recovery, regeneration, nervous system development and neurogenesis regulation. Modules 12 and 13 share some proteins in common, thus, one impacts the biological action resulting from another. Proteins associated with ontological processes shown in Table I were evaluated for their relevance to the performance of the network as a whole. Thus, it is possible to identify how these processes are mediated with the incorporation of STX in the PPI and the active mechanism that triggers from this topological change.

The main proteins – CHAT, ACHE, BCL2, BAX, BAD, CDK5, CDK8, P53, P21, ERCC2 – were identified with the profile of compound-protein interaction network N-HB (Node Hub Bottleneck) and were selected based on the relationship established with their biological processes (Table I). This process refines the analysis in order to obtain only the most relevant results for the construction and suggestion of a possible mechanism of action.

DISCUSSION

In this study we used the in vitro CBMN-Cyt test in SH-SY5Y human derived neural cells to assess the cytogenotoxicity of relevant environmental concentrations of STX, obtained from a Raphidiopsis raciborskii culture. We next applied computational biology tools to study the possible mechanisms underlying cytotoxicity and chromosome instability induced by STX. The undifferentiated SH-SY5Y cells are considered the closest to a phenotype of immature catecholaminergic neurons (Xicoy et al. 2017), being a suitable model for the study of the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of neurotoxins.

The results regarding CBMN-Cyt assay demonstrated the cytostatic effect and apoptosis of cells exposed to the STX concentrations of 2.5 - 10 μg/L and 10 μg/L, respectively. Chromosome instability was revealed by the significant enhancements of MNi and NBUDs frequencies in cells treated with STX concentrations of 2.5, 5 and 10 μg/L. MNi are originated from chromosome breaks (clastogenic effect) and/or chromosome loss (aneugenic effect), whereas NBUDs are the result of amplified DNA or chromatin which were eliminated throughout the S-phase of mitosis (Fenech 2006). NPBs are biomarkers of chromosome rearrangements that arises from DNA mis-repair and/or telomere end-fusions events (Fenech 2000). Thus, the results of this study point to the cytotoxicity and mutagenicity of STX in neural cells.

Melegari et al. (2015) exposed Neuro 2A (N2A), a neuroblastoma mouse cell line, and Vero cell line, derived from Vero green monkey kidney cells to several concentrations of STX to determine cell viability, induction of apoptosis and formation of micronuclei (MN) following 24 h of incubation. With increasing STX concentration there was evidence of DNA fragmentation indicating apoptosis induction in Vero cells with a 50% increase in DNA fragmentation compared to control at the highest STX concentration tested (3 nM). In the other hand, the results demonstrated no significant changes in the frequency of micronucleate binucleated cells in N2A and Vero cells exposed to STX, indicating the absence of genotoxicity under the test conditions. Cultured cells from the brain of H. malabaricus were treated with different concentrations of STX. The results revealed the induction of reactive oxygen species (ROS), quantified by the specific activity of glutathione peroxidase and lipoperoxidation level, cytotoxicity and genotoxic potential of STX in the comet assay (Da Silva et al. 2014).

It is well documented that the exposure to STX is associated with oxidative stress, as observed by the induction of ROS and/or the depletion of antioxidants in aquatic organisms (Estrada et al. 2007, Nogueira et al. 2004, Clemente et al. 2010, Choi et al. 2006). Ramos et al. (2014) evaluated STX produced by Raphidiopsis raciborskii in rats. The animals received, for 30 days, water with STX at concentrations of 3 and 9 µg/L. The results of this study showed that, at both concentrations, STX induced lipid peroxidation in the liver of animals, reduced levels of antioxidant enzymes, and induced oxidative stress, through increased levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the cortex and hippocampus. Some tissues, such as the brain, are more vulnerable to oxidative stress, due to high oxygen consumption and, consequently, the generation of large amounts of ROS (Migliore & Coppedè 2009). Thus, the induction of ROS in SHSY-5Y cultured cells exposed to STX is possibly the cause of the increments in the frequencies of MNi and NBUDs as observed in this study.

In order to shed more light on the mechanisms underlying chromosome instability, cytostasis and apoptosis in SHSY-5Y cultured cells exposed to STX, we applied a systems biology approach. The main cellular response resulting from the administration of STX is the blockage of Na⁺ channels (Valério et al. 2010). The in silico study identified proteins related to this process by the relationship of these channels with acetylcholine, ACH. We determined as relevant nodes, the modulating proteins of ACH, CHAT (choline acetyltransferase) and ACHE (acetylcholinesterase). CHAT is responsible for the synthesis of acetylcholine, catalyzing the process of incorporation of the acetyl group into the coenzyme acetyl-coA, synthesizing acetylcholine. CHAT expression is particularly high in cholinergic neurons and, in the case of the SH-SY5Y cell line, it is identified as an overexpressed protein (Matsuo et al. 2011, de Medeiros et al. 2019). ACHE is a primary cholinesterase, responsible for the breakdown of ACH and other choline esters, regulating ACH levels. The dysregulation in the expression of CHAT and ACHE in SH-SY5Y cell line results in higher levels of the neurotransmitter ACH (de Medeiros et al. 2019, Jiang et al. 2019). In our study, CHAT and ACHE were identified as HUBs, linked to the biological processes we selected as relevant for the action of STX. Thus, the overexpression of CHAT along with the blockade of Na⁺ channels could prevent the release of ACH, leading to ACH intracellular accumulation and triggering another process mediated by ACHE, that results in apoptosis through mitochondrial and caspase pathways. On the other hand, the ACH accumulation increases the levels of ROS, which implies in the induction of chromosomal instability (Xi et al. 2015), as observed in the in vitro CBMN assay.

The damage on the genetic material triggers repair mechanisms, which we identified with the HUB node represented by the ERCC protein. ERCC2 is a protein that actively works on the nucleotide excision repair (NER) (Li et al. 2019). The accumulation of damage, above the repair capacity by NER, triggers another pathway of action by phosphorylation of AKT1 (another HUB node in our analysis). AKT1 modulates several pathways, including TP53 and P21, both HUB nodes, which act in the forwarding of the apoptotic mechanism and in the cell cycle progression, respectively (Ersahin et al. 2015). The effect of STX on the cell cycle might also occurs through the direct inhibition of CDK5 and CDK8, two HUB nodes observed in our in silico model. Inhibition of CDK5 prevents cell cycle progression (cytostasis), along with the activation of apoptotic pathway by TP53.

Based on the results obtained from the in vitro and in silico analysis, we suggested a mechanism of action that allows us to observe the possible effect of STX on SH-SY5Y cell line (Figure 4). The overexpression of CHAT in the SH-SY5Y cell line, and the blockade that STX exerts on the functional capacity of Na⁺ channels, results in ACH cytosolic accumulation, which will reduce ACHE degradation capacity, leading to apoptosis via BCL2 activation, inactivating BAX and triggering caspase pathway. The accumulation of ACH favors the increase of ROS, which, more directly, result in genotoxic damage. Thus, NER mediated ERCC2 results in cell cycle blockade by P21, activating AKT1. Activated AKT1 modulates several central processes for cell maintenance, including apoptosis by TP53.

Figure 4
Mechanism of action of STX in SH-SY5Y cell line. STX acts by directly blocking Na⁺ channels as well as inhibiting cyclin-dependent kinases 5 and 8 (CDK5 and CDK8). The overexpression of CHAT, the protein responsible for the synthesis of ACH, and the blockade of NA⁺ channels result in the accumulation of cytosolic ACH. Difficulty in degradation leads to activation of apoptosis via activation of the caspase cascade. The accumulation of ACH leads to the generation of ROS, which induce chromosomal mutations and genomic instability, triggering the apoptotic pathway by TP53 and/or cell cycle arrest (cytostatic effect) by P21.

The blockage of cell cycle progression could be explained along with the P21-mediated mechanism. STX works directly blocking the action of CDK5 and CDK8, both of which are closely associated with cell cycle progression and control. CDK5 inhibition, besides cell cycle arresting, can activate TP53 and trigger cell death. Similarly, CDK8 blockade arrests cell cycle as well as indirectly mediates the progression of caspase cascade.

It is worth mentioning that according to the Brazilian Ministry of Health (Regulation number 2914/2011) the analysis of saxitoxin in drinking water is mandatory, with the maximum acceptable limit of 3 μg/L (Fitzgerald et al. 1999, Brazilian Ministry of Health 2011). Based on this study, STX induced cytostasis and chromosome instability in concentrations of 2.5 – 10 μg/L in a dose-response relationship and apoptosis in the concentration of 10 μg/L in a human-derived neural cell line. Our data along with other studies available in scientific literature should be taken into consideration when setting up guidelines for the maximum STX concentrations in water. Finally, the possibility of associating data obtained through genetic toxicology with in silico tools, opens a new perspective for understanding the mechanisms and responses at the level of DNA and proteins induced by cyanotoxins.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was financed in part by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Brazil (CAPES) – Finance Code 001. This work was supported by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Brazil (CNPq, grant number 310094/2016-0).

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

Figure S1

REFERENCES

• BADER GD & HOGUE CW. 2003. An automated method for finding molecular complexes in large protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinformatics 4: 2.
• BARABÁSI AL & OLTVAI ZN. 2004. Network biology: understanding the cell’s functional organization. Nat Rev Genet 5(2): 101-113.
• BENJAMINI Y & HOCHBERG Y. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 57(1): 289-300.
• BRAZILIAN MINISTRY OF HEALTH. 2011. Portaria n°8 2.914 de 12 de dezembro de 2011. Diário Oficial da União, N8239, seção 1.
• BURATTI FM, MANGANELLI M, VICHI S, STEFANELLI M, SCARDALA S, TESTAI E & FUNARI E. 2017. Cyanotoxins: producing organisms, occurrence, toxicity, mechanism of action and human health toxicological risk evaluation. Arch Toxicol 91(3): 1049-1130.
• CALADO SLM, SANTOS GS, VICENTINI M, BOZZA DC, PRODOCIMO V, MAGALHÃES VF, CESTARI MM & SILVA DE ASSIS HC. 2020. Multiple biomarkers response in a Neotropical fish exposed to paralytic shellfish toxins (PSTs). Chemosphere 238: 124616.
• CHOI NM, YEUNG LW, SIU WH, SO IM, JACK RW, HSIEH DP, WU RS & LAM PK. 2006. Relationships between tissue concentrations of paralytic shellfish toxins and antioxidative responses of clams, Ruditapes philippinarum. Mar Pollut Bull 52(5): 572-578.
• CLEMENTE Z, BUSATO R, RIBEIRO C, CESTARI M, RAMSDORF W, MAGALHAES V, WOSIACK A & ASSIS A. 2010. Analyses of paralytic shellfish toxins and biomarkers in a southern Brazilian reservoir. Toxicon 55: 396-406.
• CUSICK KD & SAYLER GS. 2013. An overview on the marine neurotoxin, saxitoxin: genetics, molecular targets, methods of detection and ecological functions. Mar Drugs 11(4): 991-1018
• DA SILVA CA ET AL. 2014. Saxitoxins induce cytotoxicity, genotoxicity and oxidative stress in teleost neurons in vitro. Toxicon 86: 8-15.
• DE MEDEIROS LM, DE BASTIANI MA, RICO EP, SCHONHOFEN P, PFAFFENSELLER B, WOLLENHAUPT-AGUIAR B, GRUN L, BARBÉ-TUANA F, ZIMMER ER & CASTRO MAA. 2019. Cholinergic Differentiation of Human Neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y Cell Line and Its Potential Use as an In vitro Model for Alzheimer’s Disease Studies. Mol Neurobiol 56(11): 7355-7367.
• DENG JL, XU YH & WANG G. 2019. Identification of Potential Crucial Genes and Key Pathways in Breast Cancer Using Bioinformatic Analysis. Front Genet 10: 695.
• DROBAC D, TOKODI N, SIMEUNOVIĆ J, BALTIĆ V, STANIĆ D & SVIRČEV Z. 2013. Human exposure to cyanotoxins and their effects on health. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol 64(2): 119-130.
• ERSAHIN T, TUNCBAG N & CETIN-ATALAY R. 2015. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR interactive pathway. Mol Biosyst 11(7): 1946-1954.
• ESTRADA N, ROMERO M, CÓRDOVA A, LUNA A & ASCENCIO F. 2007. Effects of the toxic dinoflagellate Gymnodinium catenatum on hydrolytic and antioxidant enzymes, in tissues of the giant lions-paw scallop Nodipecten subnodosus. Comp Biochem Physiol C Pharmacol Toxicol 146(4): 502-510.
• FENECH M. 2000. The in vitro micronucleus technique. Mutat Res 455(1-2): 81-95.
• FENECH M. 2006. Cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay evolves into a “cytome” assay of chromosomal instability, mitotic dysfunction and cell death. Mutat Res 600(1-2): 58-66.
• FENECH M. 2007. Cytokinesis-block micronucleus cytome assay. Nat Protoc 2(5): 1084-104.
• FITZGERALD D, CUNLIFFE D & BURCH M. 1999. Development of health alerts for cyanobacteria and related toxins in drinking water in South Australia. Environ Toxicol 14: 203-209.
• GLIBERT PM. 2017. Eutrophication, harmful algae and biodiversity - Challenging paradigms in a world of complex nutrient changes. Mar Pollut Bull 124(2): 591-606.
• GORHAM PR, MCLACHLAN J, HAMMER UT & KIM WK. 1964. Isolation and culture of toxic strains of Anabaena flos-aquae (Lyngb.) de Bréb. SIL Proceedings 15(2): 796-804.
• HO JC, MICHALAK AM & PAHLEVAN N. 2019. Widespread global increase in intense lake phytoplankton blooms since the 1980s. Nature 574(7780): 667-670.
• JIANG N, DING J, LIU J, SUN X, ZHANG Z, MO Z, LI X, YIN H, TANG W & XIE SS. 2019. Novel chromanone-dithiocarbamate hybrids as multifunctional AChE inhibitors with β-amyloid anti-aggregation properties for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Bioorg Chem 89: 103027.
• LI Q ET AL. 2019. ERCC2 Helicase Domain Mutations Confer Nucleotide Excision Repair Deficiency and Drive Cisplatin Sensitivity in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 25(3): 977-988.
• MATSUO A, BELLIER JP, NISHIMURA M, YASUHARA O, SAITO N & KIMURA H. 2011. Nuclear choline acetyltransferase activates transcription of a high-affinity choline transporter. Neurobiol 286(7): 5836-5845.
• MELEGARI SP, DE CARVALHO PINTO CR, MOUKHA S, CREPPY EE & MATIAS WG. 2015. Evaluation of Cytotoxicity and Cell Death Induced In Vitro by Saxitoxin in Mammalian Cells. J Toxicol Environ Health A 78(19): 1189-1200.
• MIGLIORE L & COPPEDÈ F. 2009. Environmental-induced oxidative stress in neurodegenerative disorders and aging. Mutat Res 674(1-2): 73-84.
• MIOTTO MC, COSTA LDF, BRENTANO DM, NADER C, SOUZA LSS, GRESSLER PD, LAUDARES-SILVA R, YUNES JS, BARUFI JB & RORIG LR. 2017. Ecophysiological characterization and toxin profile of two strains of Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii isolated from a subtropical lagoon in Southern Brazil. Hydrobiologia 802: 97-113.
• NIELSEN MC & JIANG SC. 2020. Can cyanotoxins penetrate human skin during water recreation to cause negative health effects? Harmful Algae 98: 101872.
• NOGUEIRA IC, PEREIRA P, DIAS E, PFLUGMACHER S, WIEGAND C, FRANCA S & VASCONCELOS VM. 2004. Accumulation of paralytic shellfish toxins (PST) from the cyanobacterium Aphanizomenon issatschenkoi by the cladoceran Daphnia magna. Toxicon 44(7): 773-780.
• OECD. 2016. Guideline for the testing of chemicals: in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test.
• PRATHEEPA V & VASCONCELOS V. 2017. Binding and Pharmacokinetics of the Sodium Channel Blocking Toxins (Saxitoxin and the Tetrodotoxins). Mini Rev Med Chem 17(4): 320-327.
• RAMOS PB, DIEHL F, SANTOS JM, MONSERRAT JM & YUNES JS. 2014. Oxidative stress in rats induced by consumption of saxitoxin contaminated drink water. Harmful Algae 37: 68-74.
• ROUILLARD AD, GUNDERSEN GW, FERNANDEZ NF, WANG Z, MONTEIRO CD, MCDERMOTT MG & MA’AYAN A. 2016. The harmonizome: a collection of processed datasets gathered to serve and mine knowledge about genes and proteins. Database (Oxford) 2010: 100.
• ROURKE WA, MURPHY CJ, PITCHER G, RIET JMV, BURNS GB, THOMAS KM & QUILLIAM MA. 2008. Rapid postcolumn methodology for determination of paralytic shellfish toxins in shellfish tissue. AOAC International 91(3): 589-597.
• SHANNON P, MARKIEL A, OZIER O, BALIGA NS, WANG JT, RAMAGE D, AMIN N, SCHWIKOWSKI B & IDEKER T. 2013. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res 13(11): 2498-2504.
• SIVONEN K & JONES G. 1999. Cyanobacterial Toxins. In: Chorus I & Bartram J (Eds), Toxic Cyanobacteria in Water: A Guide to Their Public Health Consequences, Monitoring, and Management, E & FN Spon, London, p. 41-111.
• SU Y, ZHANG C, LIU J, WENG Y, LI H & ZHANG D. 2016. Assessing the impacts of phosphorus inactive clay on phosphorus release control and phytoplankton community structure in eutrophic lakes. Environ Pollut 219: 620-630.
• SZKLARCZYK D ET AL. 2019. STRING v11: protein-protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets. Nucleic Acids Res 47: 607-613.
• SZKLARCZYK D, SANTOS A, VON MERING C, JENSEN LJ, BORK P & KUHN M. 2016. STITCH 5: augmenting protein-chemical interaction networks with tissue and affinity data. Nucleic Acids Res 44: 380-384.
• VALÉRIO E, CHAVES S & TENREIRO R. 2010. Diversity and impact of prokaryotic toxins on aquatic environments: a review. Toxins (Basel) 2(10): 2359-2410.
• XI HJ, WU RP, LIU JJ, ZHANG LJ & LI ZS. 2015. Role of acetylcholinesterase in lung cancer. Thorac Cancer 6(4): 390-398.
• XIA T. 2010. “Network modeling in systems biology” (). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 11594. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/11594 https://doi.org/10.31274/etd-180810-4318, 84 p.
  » https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/11594
• XICOY H, WIERINGA B & MARTENS GJ. 2017. The SH-SY5Y cell line in Parkinson’s disease research: a systematic review. Mol Neurodegeneration 10: 1-11.
• YANG Y, YU G, CHEN Y, JIA N & LI R. 2021. Four decades of progress in cylindrospermopsin research: The ins and outs of a potent cyanotoxin. J Hazard Mater 406: 124653.
• YU H, KIM PM, SPRECHER E, TRIFONOV V & GERSTEIN M. 2007. The importance of bottlenecks in protein networks: correlation with gene essentiality and expression dynamics. PLoS Comput Biol 3(4): e59.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  02 Dec 2022
• Date of issue
  2022

History

• Received
  13 Jan 2022
• Accepted
  09 May 2022