Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Spontaneous carotid dissection with hypoglossal nerve palsy as residual deficit: the importance of magnetic resonance evaluation

Dissecção espontânea de carótida com paralisia residual do nervo hipoglosso: a importância da avaliação por ressonância magnética

LETTER

Spontaneous carotid dissection with hypoglossal nerve palsy as residual deficit: the importance of magnetic resonance evaluation

Dissecção espontânea de carótida com paralisia residual do nervo hipoglosso: a importância da avaliação por ressonância magnética

Marcio Luiz Escorio Bezerra; José Luiz Pedroso; Alexandre Pieri

Department of Neurology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo SP, Brazil

Spontaneous dissection of the carotid artery was once considered uncommon, but nowadays neuroimaging progress has lead to an increased recognition of the pathology. It is an important cause of stroke in young patients, representing 10 to 25% of the cases1,2. Most patients affected are in the fifth decade of life2,3. It is not definitely established whether the cardiovascular risk factors are important in spontaneous carotid dissection; however, tobacco use, migraine and respiratory tract infections have been shown to be relevant in different studies1-4. In spite of the term spontaneous dissection, minor precipitating events, such as rotation or hyperextension of the neck, are frequently found1,5. The most frequent initial symptom is headache, which is reported in up to 90% of the cases, usually preceding the neurological deficit. Few patients present the classical triad of headache, ischemic stroke and Horner syndrome. Cranial nerve palsy is found in about 12% of the cases, but unusually it is the sole manifestation1-3.

We report a case of carotid artery dissection presenting as lower cranial nerve palsy and headache. The diagnosis was made through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), using fat suppression technique, highlighting its importance in such cases.

CASE

A 45 year-old right handed man with previous history of systemic hypertension experienced severe right cervical pain followed by pain in the ipsilateral ear. He reported no traumatic or strenuous event in the previous days. The pain remitted with regular analgesics, but two days later it returned with the same qualities, what made the patient seek medical counseling. The systemic blood pressure was high, and analgesics and antihypertensive medications were administered. On this same day, he felt that his tong was numb on the right posterior area and he noticed difficulty in manipulating food in the mouth. The next morning he woke up with tong paresthesia, dysphagia and dysarthria. He was then taken to the hospital. Upon admission, general examination was unremarkable. Neurological examination disclosed right hypoglossal palsy, in addition to ipsilateral palsy of the glossopharyngeal and vagus nerves. Cranial CT showed no abnormalities and brain MRI was highly suggestive of right carotid artery dissection (Fig 1A). Carotid and vertebral Doppler ultrasonography was also performed, but showed no abnormalities. Antiplatelet therapy was started. Four months later a second MRI and MR angiography showed no signs of dissection (Fig 1B). Follow-up clinical examination detected a mild hypoglossal palsy (Fig 2), but there was no longer dysarthria or dysphagia.



DISCUSSION

Lower cranial palsy has a large range of differential diagnoses, such as malignant tumors in the base of the skull, neurinomas, leptomeningeal carcinomatosis, infectious diseases or may even be idiopathic6,7, but carotid or vertebral dissection should always be considered. The absence of ischemic stroke and the fact that clinically it presented as lower nerve palsy, may have delayed the diagnosis in this case.

Carotid dissection usually arises from an intimal tear of the artery. The intramural hematoma may grow towards the intima, which cause stenosis of the arterial lumen or towards the adventicia, resulting in aneurismal dilatation1. Considering that there were only local symptoms (cranial nerve palsies) and that brain MRI showed only intramural hematoma and no vascular lumen abnormalities, it was probably an adventicia dissection. In contrast, with the intimal tear, the vascular lumen is affected and tends to cause distal ischemia due to embolization.

The gold standard diagnostic method for carotid dissection is angiography, which is limited by its invasiveness. This case highlights the importance of MRI with MR angiography as a diagnostic method. Its resolution approaches the conventional angiography and is able to show intramural hematoma, especially when fat suppression techniques are used8. The complementary exam also showed that the dissection extended to the petrous portion of the carotid artery, which is an uncommon event because usually the temporal bone represents a barrier to the pathologic process1. Also, it became evident that even thought ultrasonographic techniques are useful, as the dissection is a dynamic process, the abnormalities may appear only in an initial moment9.

The follow-up MRI with no abnormalities emphasizes the dissection as a transitory process with a good prognosis3. Treatment involves antithrombotic or antiplatelet therapy, as was the case in our patient. Systemic anticoagulation may bring some benefits by reducing the risk of embolization and aiding intimal healing, but there is no conclusive evidence in current literature for one choice over the other1-3,10.

Received 16 February 2009, received in final form 3 July 2009. Accepted 23 July 2009.

Dr. Marcio Luiz Escorio Bezerra - Rua Dr. Diogo de Faria 671 / 106 - 04037-002 São Paulo SP - Brasil. E-mail: marciobzrra@gmail.com

  • 1. Schievink WI. Spontaneous dissection of the carotid and vertebral arteries. N Engl J Med 2001;344:898-906.
  • 2. Campos CR, Evaristo EF, Yamamoto FL, Pugli Jr P, Lucato LT, Scaff M. Dissecção espontânea cervical carotídea e vertebral. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2004;62:492-498.
  • 3. Pieri A, Spitz M, Valiente RA, Avelar WM, Silva GS, Massaro AR. Spontaneous carotid and vertebral arteries dissection in a multiethnic population. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2007;65:1050-1055.
  • 4. Grau AJ, Brandt T, Buggle F, et al. Association of cervical artery dissection with recent infection. Arch Neurol 1999;56:851-856.
  • 5. Norris JW, Beletsky V, Nadareishvili ZG, Canadian Stroke Consortium. Sudden neck movement and cervical artery dissection. CMAJ 2000;163:38-40.
  • 6. Combarros O, Alvarez de Arcaya A, Berciano J. Isolated unilateral hypoglossal nerve palsy: nine cases. J Neurol 1998;245:98-100.
  • 7. Schoenen J, Sándor PS. Headache with focal neurological signs or symptoms: a complicated diferential diagnosis. Lancet Neurol 2004;3:237-245.
  • 8. Rizzo L, Crasto GS, Savio D, et al. Dissection of cervicocephalic arteries: early diagnosis and follow-up with magnetic resonance imaging. Emerg Radiol 2006;12: 254-265.
  • 9. Benninger DH, Georgiadis D, Gandjour J, Baumgartner RW. Accuracy of color Duplex ultrasound diagnosis of spontaneous carotid dissection causing ischemia. Stroke 2006;37:377-381.
  • 10. Redekop GJ. Extracranial carotid and vertebral artery dissection: a review. Can J Neurol Sci 2008;35:146-152.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    16 Dec 2009
  • Date of issue
    Dec 2009
Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO R. Vergueiro, 1353 sl.1404 - Ed. Top Towers Offices Torre Norte, 04101-000 São Paulo SP Brazil, Tel.: +55 11 5084-9463 | +55 11 5083-3876 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: revista.arquivos@abneuro.org