Treatment of patients with immunodeficiency: Medication, gene therapy, and transplantation

Abstract

Objectives:

To provide an overview of drug treatment, transplantation, and gene therapy for patients with primary immunodeficiencies.

Source of data:

Non-systematic review of the literature in the English language carried out at PubMed.

Synthesis of data:

The treatment of patients with primary immunodeficiencies aims to control their disease, especially the treatment and prevention of infections through antibiotic prophylaxis and/or immunoglobulin replacement therapy. In several diseases, it is possible to use specific medications for the affected pathway with control of the condition, especially in autoimmune or autoinflammatory processes associated with inborn immunity errors. In some diseases, treatment can be curative through hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT); more recently, gene therapy has opened new horizons through new technologies.

Conclusions:

Immunoglobulin replacement therapy remains the main therapeutic tool. Precision medicine with specific drugs for altered immune pathways is already a reality for several immune defects. Advances in the management of HSCT and gene therapy have expanded the capacity for curative treatments in patients with primary immunodeficiencies.

KEYWORDS
Primary immunodeficiency diseases; Immunoglobulin therapy; Antibiotic therapy; Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; Gene therapy

Introduction

Primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs), recently called inborn errors of immunity (IEI), are a growing group of more than 400 diseases, mostly of monogenic origin, associated with pathogenic variations of more than 430previously described genes. Patients with IEI have a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations, from mildly symptomatic patients with a late diagnosis to those with severe symptoms and risk of death, which is significant from the first months of life onwards.¹

Most IEI lead to changes in essential immune pathways resulting in increased susceptibility to common and opportunistic pathogens; however, in other cases these changes in the immune system lead to greater susceptibility to a single microorganism or a restricted group of pathogens.² In addition to infections, primary immunodeficiencies can occur together with changes in the immune system regulation, predisposing the patient to autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases or severe allergies, which can develop as complications throughout life or even, in an IEI group, constitute the main clinical manifestations.^3,4

The care and treatment of patients with IEI differ according to the result of the defect, the affected immune pathway, and the severity of each case. Therefore, an accurate diagnosis is crucial for adequate treatment, including general care, broad-spectrum or specific pharmacotherapies, such as the use of biological agents, and the use of curative therapies, such as bone marrow transplantation and gene therapy.⁵ The objective of this review is to provide an overview of the management of patients with IEI.

Antibiotic therapy

Infections are the most common forms of presentation in patients with IEI and depend on the type of immune defect present. The treatment of infections in patients with IEI is complex, requiring long-term use of medication and often those with a broad spectrum. Due to the greater susceptibility to unusual agents, a greater effort must be made for the exact identification of pathogens, including the culture of affected tissues and molecular techniques to identify the pathogen.⁶

The use of prophylactic antibiotic therapy is quite widespread in the management of patients with primary immunodeficiencies, aiming to reduce the frequency and severity of infections, especially sinopulmonary infections caused by common bacteria; in some PIDs with more specific susceptibilities, prophylactic antiviral and/or antifungal therapy may be necessary.⁷ Most physicians treating patients with IEI reported the use of prophylactic antimicrobials in at least some of their patients.⁸ However, there is scarce scientifically-based evidence for the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in PIDs, except for chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) and severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID).^9-11 Recently, the prophylactic use of azithromycin in patients with antibody defects (common variable immunodeficiency [CVID] and agammaglobulinemia) undergoing immunoglobulin replacement therapy showed a reduction in the number of annual exacerbations, use of antibiotics for treatment, and risk of hospitalization.¹²

In addition to the above mentioned PID pictures, isolated antibiotic prophylaxis is often offered to patients with mild hypogammaglobulinemia, selective immunoglobulin A (IgA) deficiency or deficiency of IgG subclasses, who are not receiving immunoglobulin, despite the lack of evidence to support the use of antibiotics in this population. In these cases, the medications are used at certain times of the year (especially in winter) or continuously, depending on the individual analysis of each case. A careful monitoring of these patients' adverse effects and infection rates is important.¹³

Table 1 presents several antibiotic prophylaxis regimens currently used in the treatment of patients with IEI, grouped in a very convenient way in a non-systematic review, and then translated and adapted to the Brazilian context. As there is no standardization or formal consensus, the agents and doses shown in the Table are those most commonly used; however, other regimens are used in different centers and may also be adequate.¹⁴

Table 1
Examples of antibiotic prophylaxis regimens used in patients with immunodeficiency.

Prevention intention	Preferential regimen	Alternative regimen
Pneumocystis jirovecii	Sulfametoxazol-trimetoprima (SXT-TMP): . Infants> 4 weeks of age and children: 5 mg/kg/day divided into two doses 3x/week (Based on TMP, maximum 160 mg per day) . Adults and adolescents with normal kidney function: based on TMP 80 mg/day or 160 mg daily or 160 mg 3x/week	Dapsone: . Infants and children: 2 mg/kg/day daily 1x/day (maximum: 100 mg/day) . Adults: 100 mg 1x/day or 50 mg 2x/day Pentamidine: . Children <5 years: 9 mg/kg (maximum: 300 mg/dose) nebulized inhalation every 4weeks . Children> 5 years, adolescents and adults: 300 mg nebulized inhalation every 4 weeks
Staphylococcus spp, Gram-negative spp	SXT-TMP . Infants> 4 weeks of age and children: 5 mg/kg/day divided into 2 daily doses (Based on TMP, maximum 160 mg per day) Adults and adolescents: based on TMP 160 mg daily	Amoxicillin:a . Children: 10-20 mg/kg per day, single dose or divided into 2x (maximum: 875 mg/day) . Adolescents and adults: 875 mg Ciprofloxacin:a,b# . Children: 10 mg/kg/dose 2x/day (maximum: 500 mg) . Adults: 500 mg Amoxicillin and clavulanate:a . Children: 20 mg/kg per day single dose or divided into 2x (maximum: 875 mg/day based on amoxicillin) . Adolescents and adults: 875 mg (based on amoxicillin)
Mycoplasma spp, Streptococcus spp	Azithromycin . Children: 5-10 mg/kg/oral dose 3x/week (maximum: 250 mg) . Adolescents and adults: 250 mg oral dose 3x/week
Atypical mycobacteriosis	Azithromycin . Children: 20 mg/kg/oral dose 1x/week (maximum dose of 1200 mg/week; can be given up to 600 mg 2x/without causing nausea at high doses) . Adolescents and adults: 1200 mg 1x/week (or 600 2x/week in case of nausea)
Aspergillus spp	Itraconazole: . Children: 5 mg/kg/day orally (maximum: 200 mg) . Adolescents and adults: 200 mg oral daily	Voriconazolec: . ≤ 50 kg: 8 mg/kg/oral dose 2x/day (maximum per dose: 350 mg) > 50 kg: 4 mg/kg/oral dose 2x/day (maximum per dose: 200 mg)
Candida spp	Fluconazole: . Children: 6 mg/kg orally daily (maximum: 400 mg) . Adolescents and adults: 400 mg orally daily
HSV/VZV	Acyclovir: . Children <40 kg: 600 mg oral dose 4x/day . Children> 40 kg: 800 mg oral dose 4 x/day . Adults: 800 mg oral dose 2x/day
CMV	Valganciclovir: . Children 1 month to 16 years: oral dose (mg) = 7 × body surface area × creatinine clearance . Adolescents ≥17 years and adults with normal renal function: 900 mg oral dose 1x/day

• spp, species; HSV, herpes simplex virus; VZV, varicella zoster virus; CMV, cytomegalovirus.
  Adapted from Bundy et al. ¹⁴
• ^a
  Without preference, it varies according to the local sensitivity profile.
• ^b
  Always consider the risks of musculoskeletal adverse events in children.
• ^c
  Requires monitoring of drug levels.

Immunoglobulin replacement therapy

Around 50%-75% of IEI patients require immunoglobulin replacement, because antibody production is absent or inadequate. In turn, with the advances in the treatment of lymphomas, leukemias, and other types of cancer, the number of cases of secondary immunodeficiency that affect antibody production is increasing and must be remembered. In Brazil, we currently have medications for intravenous or subcutaneous administration. We will address the main indications and the comparison between intravenous and subcutaneous administration.

Regarding the therapeutic benefit, immunoglobulin replacement therapy indications can be classified as:

• Proven benefit

  Immune system defects that affect B-cells

  Hypogammaglobulinemia and inefficient antibody production

• Likely benefit

  Immunoglobulins with apparently normal levels, but with a qualitative defect in the specific antibody production

• No benefit/Contraindicated

  Selective IgA deficiency

  IgG4 deficiency

From a practical standpoint, the recommendation of the European Immunodeficiency Society (ESID) can be followed for immunoglobulin replacement therapy indication:¹⁵

1. IgG < 200 mg/dL: all patients

2. IgG 200−500 mg/dL: associated with repeated infections

3. IgG > 500 mg/dL: specific antibody deficiency associated with severe or repeated infections

   The main immunodeficiencies that require immunoglobulin replacement therapy are:

   • Agammaglobulinemia:

     It refers to a defect in the ontogeny of B lymphocytes, which become absent and, therefore, there is no antibody production. This group of diseases can be detected in neonatal screening by the KRECs test and later confirmed by complete lymphocyte immunophenotyping.

   • Hypogammaglobulinemia

     In this case, there is a reduction in the production of antibodies and a decrease in the serum levels of immunoglobulins.¹⁶ The classic example of this group of diseases is CVID, which can be the result of several genetic alterations.

   • Hyper-IgM syndrome

     These diseases are characterized by reduced levels of IgA and IgG and normal or elevated levels of IgM. The number of B-lymphocytes is usually normal, but patients have a clinical picture of repeated infections similar to cases of agammaglobulinemia or combined immunodeficiency.¹⁷

   • Antibody deficiency with normal levels of Immunoglobulins

Deficient response to polysaccharide antigens associated with severe infections and risk of sequelae.^2,18

Patients with hyper-IgE syndrome usually have normal levels of immunoglobulins, but some have antibody production deficiency after immunization.¹⁹ In Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome, there is also impaired antibody production to protein and polysaccharide antigens, and immunoglobulin replacement helps in the reduction of infectious conditions until the transplantation is performed.^20,21 In cases of ataxia-telangiectasia, a significant number of patients have repeated infections, as well as cell and humoral immunity alterations.²²

There is no indication for immunoglobulin replacement in patients with selective IgA deficiency, unless there is an association with deficiency of IgG subclasses or a qualitative defect in antibody production.²³ Immunoglobulin replacement should also be considered in cases of cancer, lymphoma, leukemias, and for those using immunosuppressive drugs.²⁴

The intravenous infusion of immunoglobulins is performed every three to four weeks, with an initial dose of 400−600 mg/kg, so that the IgG level is >500 mg/dl in patients with agammaglobulinemia, with a consequent reduction in infections.^25,26 Higher doses, of around 800 mg/kg, help in the control of pulmonary problems, and are recommended for patients with chronic pulmonary disease and/or chronic sinusitis.^2,27-29 The subcutaneous infusion of immunoglobulins can be carried out weekly, biweekly, or monthly, depending on the formulation. In Brazil formulations at 10%, 20%, or 10% linked to the previous infusion of hyaluronidase, are available. The dose regimen is similar and follows the equivalent of 100−150 mg/kg per week.²⁴

IgG level monitoring should be carried out at intervals of three months up to a maximum of six months, depending on the infectious picture. After the sixth infusion, a stable value is reached and the dose and interval must be adjusted to obtain the best clinical result.^16,24

Most adverse effects associated with the intravenous infusion of immunoglobulins are related to the infusion rate. Patients who have never received this medication or those who are infected are at increased risk of adverse effects. These effects are partly related to the formation of antigen-antibody complexes and can be reduced if the patient is afebrile and undergoing treatment for the infection.^16,24 Another risk factor is the frequent change of immunoglobulin brand, a common fact in Brazil.³⁰ Adverse effects during the infusion mimic infectious conditions. Among the symptoms, tremors, arthralgia/myalgia, fever, and headache have been observed. Good patient hydration and reduced infusion rate are effective measures in preventing adverse events. Regarding the subcutaneous infusion, a fraction of the cases have local irritation effects, which tend to disappear over time.²⁴

Medications

In the last decade, the great advance in the knowledge of genetics and the understanding of the pathophysiology of primary immunodeficiencies and of how changes in certain molecules generate alterations in important immune system pathways has also opened a window of opportunities for the more accurate treatment of these patients. This greater understanding of the immune system function allowed a deeper comprehension of changes in its regulation and the impact on the patients, who often did not fit in as a classic primary immunodeficiency or a classic autoimmune disease. Currently, these patients are included in a growing group of alterations known as immune dysregulation and thus, new treatment opportunities have also been found for these patients.¹

Therefore, new drugs appear all the time, especially precision immunobiological agents, which are being tested and approved for patients with IEI. Regarding the immunological knowledge, other drugs have been reassessed and some have been used for more specific defects of the immune system, such as several immunosuppressants in immune dysregulations. As they constitute a large number of diseases and drugs, extremely specific for one or other PID, the authors chose to describe only those of main use in Table 2.¹⁴

Table 2
Examples of medications used to treat patients with primary immunodeficiencies.

Medication	Action	Use inimmuno deficiency
Abatacept	CTLA4-IgG (acts similarly to the CTLA4 molecule)	CTLA-4 haploinsufficiency, LRBA deficiency
Adalimumab/Etanercept/Infliximabe	Anti-TNF alpha	STING-associated vasculopathy with onset in infancy, CANDLE syndrome, POMP syndrome, PAPA syndrome, Blau syndrome
Anakinra/Canakinumb/Rilonacept	Anti-IL-1	Cryopirin-associated periodic fever, hyperIgD syndrome, IL-1 receptor antagonist deficiency
Baricinitib/Ruxolitinib	JAK inhibitors	STAT3-GOF, STAT1-GOF, CANDLE syndrome
Leniolisib	Selective PI3K delta inhibitor	Activated PI3K-delta syndrome
Rituximab	Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody	Autoimmune cytopenias (common in CVID and ALPS), granulocytic and lymphocytic interstitial lung disease
Sirolimus	mTOR inhibitor	NLCR4-GOF, POMP syndrome, CTLA-4haploinsufficiency, LRBA deficiency, sctivated PI3K-delta syndrome
Tocilizumab	Anti-IL-6	STAT3-GOF

• CTLA-4, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4; LRBA, LPS-responsive beige-like anchor protein; STING, stimulator of interferon genes; CANDLE, chronic atypical neutrophilic dermatosis with lipodystrophy and elevated temperature; POMP, proteasome maturation protein; PAPA, Pyogenic arthritis, pyoderma gangrenosum and acne; CVID, common variable immunodeficiency; ALPS, Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome.
  Adapted from Bundy et al.¹⁴

Hematopoietic cell transplantation

Most primary immunodeficiencies occur due to genetic defects intrinsic to hematopoietic cells; therefore, the replacement of these altered cells by hematopoietic stem cells from healthy donors, better known as bone marrow transplantation, is a very rational therapeutic approach.³¹ The first hematopoietic stem cell transplantations (HSCT) in patients with PID occurred more than 50 years ago, in patients with SCID and Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome.^32,33 The approach to HSCT and the overall risk has changed substantially in the past two decades, with more potential donor sources, better targeting of preparatory chemotherapy regimens, and better support care.^34,35

The decision about the indication and the correct timing of HSCT indication for a patient diagnosed with a primary immunodeficiency should always carefully consider the risks of HSCT against the risks of future evolution of the disease; it should be individualized and based not only on the specific PID, but also on each patient's characteristics.³¹ In particular, patients with SCID represent a medical emergency, as they are highly susceptible to life-threatening infections; in these patients, HSCT provides a curative treatment.^34,35 Table 3 presents an overview of HSCT indications in different groups of primary immunodeficiencies.¹⁴

Table 3
Indications for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in primary immunodeficiencies.

Type of primary immunodeficiency	Indications
SCID	Necessary for survival in all patients
Leaky-SCID	Necessary for severe infection-free survival in almost all patients
Combined immunodeficiencies	Potentially indicated, depending on the severity of the phenotype and the presence of an appropriate donor. Examples: . Defects of calcium/magnesium channels . CD40 ligand deficiency . DOCK8 deficiency . MHC defects . PNP deficiency
Syndromes with combined immunodeficiencies	Potentially indicated based on specific patient manifestations and expected survival. Examples: . Cartilage-hair hypoplasia . NEMO deficiency . Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome
Predominant antibody defects	Generally not indicated for patients in whom replacement therapy with IgG infusions provides protection against infections. Exceptions may include patients with variable common immunodeficiency who manifest severe symptoms, including immune dysregulation.
Immune dysregulation diseases	Indicated for many patients where the disease leads to risk of death. Examples: . Familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis . X-linked lymphoproliferative disease . IPEX
Phagocyte defects	Indicated for most patients. Examples: . Chronic granulomatous disease . Leukocyte adhesion deficiency . Severe congenital neutropenia
Defects of inborn immunity	Potentially suitable for some diseases, despite limited experience. Examples: . Interferon gamma receptor 1 deficiency . Loss of STAT1 function
Autoinflammatory diseases	Generally not indicated for patients in this category, very limited experience
Complement deficiencies	Not indicated in most complement defects, as most factors are produced in the liver. HSCT is a potential option in C1q deficiency

• SCID, severe combined immunodeficiency; DOCK8, dedicator of cytokinesis 8; MHC, major histocompatibility complex; NEMO, nuclear factor (NF)-kappa-B essential modifier; STAT1, signal transducer and activator of transcription 1; IPEX, immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked syndrome.

Gene therapy

Gene therapy consists of the genetic modification of autologous hematopoietic stem cells of the individual with a vector containing the corrected gene product, a procedure performed in the laboratory and later administered to the patient as an autologous bone marrow transplant. The great advantage of this procedure is that there is no need to find compatible donors, reducing the time of search and the chance of graft versus host disease. However, the initial trials with retroviral vectors were complicated with cases of leukemia and myelodysplasia using retroviral vectors.^36,37 Currently, the use of lentiviral vectors was shown to be safer, and trials with SCID due to ADA deficiency, X-linked SCID, WAS, and DCG have shown good immunological reconstitution in phase I, with no reported incidence of myelodysplasia/leukemia.^38-40

Conclusions

The expansion of knowledge on genetics and the pathophysiology of primary immunodeficiencies has increased the therapeutic arsenal for the treatment of these patients. Immunoglobulin replacement therapy remains the main therapeutic tool, as most patients with IEI have alterations in antibody quantity or quality. Precision medicine is already a reality for many patients with IEI in specific pathways, which can be treated with targeted medications for those pathways. Improvements in the management of HSCT in recent years have made it possible to transplant more and more patients with PID, offering curative therapy. In recent years, gene therapy has been successful and has become a hope for the future of patients with PIDs. Despite all the advances, it is important to remember that the diagnosis is the starting point for the treatment and should always be considered by pediatricians, who are responsible for the initial suspicion of primary immunodeficiencies.

• Funding
  GRSS-Jeffrey Modell Foundation CHILDREN Program, ACN: Jeffrey Modell Foundation CHILDREN Program, CNPQ, FAPESP.

References

• ¹
  Tangye SG, Al-Herz W, Bousfiha A, Chatila T, Cunningham-Rundles C, Etzioni A, et al. Human inborn errors of immunity: 2019 update on the classification from the International Union of Immunological Societies Expert Committee. J Clin Immunol. 2020;40:24-64.
• ²
  Bonilla FA, Khan DA, Ballas ZK, Chinen J, Frank MM, Hsu JT, et al. Practice parameter for the diagnosis and management of primary immunodeficiency. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;136:1186-205.
• ³
  Walter JE, Farmer JR, Foldvari Z, Torgerson TR, Cooper MA. Mechanism-based strategies for the management of autoimmunity and immune dysregulation in primary immunodeficiencies. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2016;4:1089-100.
• ⁴
  Giardino G, Gallo V, Prencipe R, Gaudino G, Romano R, De Cataldis M, et al. Unbalanced immune system: immunodeficiencies and autoimmunity. Front Pediatr. 2016;4:107.
• ⁵
  Marciano BE, Holland SM. Primary immunodeficiency diseases: current and emerging therapeutics. Front Immunol. 2017;8:937.
• ⁶
  Chapel H, Prevot J, Gaspar HB, Español T, Bonilla FA, Solis L, et al. Editorial board for working party on principles of care at IPOPI. Primary immune deficiencies - principles of care. Front Immunol. 2014;15(5):627.
• ⁷
  Freeman AF, Holland SM. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for primary immunodeficiencies. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;9:525-30.
• ⁸
  Yong PL, Boyle J, Ballow M, Boyle M, Berger M, Bleesing J, et al. Use of intravenous immunoglobulin and adjunctive therapies in thetreatment of primary immunodeficiencies: aworking group report of and study by the Primary Immunodeficiency Committee of the American Academy of Allergy Asthma and Immunology. Clin Immunol. 2010;135:255-63.
• ⁹
  Gallin JI, Alling DW, Malech HL, Wesley R, Koziol D, Marciano B, et al. Itraconazole to prevent fungal infections in chronic granulomatous disease. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2416-22.
• ¹⁰
  Hoernes M, Seger R, Reichenbach J. Modern management of primary B-cell immunodeficiencies. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2011;22:758-69.
• ¹¹
  Ballow M, Paris K, de la Morena M. Should antibiotic prophylaxis be routinely used in patients with antibody-mediated primary immunodeficiency?. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018;6:421-6.
• ¹²
  Milito C, Pulvirenti F, Cinetto F, Lougaris V, Soresina A, Pecoraro A, et al. Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial on low-doseazithromycin prophylaxis in patients with primary antibody deficiencies. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;144:584-93.
• ¹³
  Herrod HG. Management of the patient with IgG subclass deficiency and/or selective antibody deficiency. Ann Allergy. 1993;70:3-8.
• ¹⁴
  Bundy V, Barbieri K, Keller M, Uptodate. [cited 26September 2020].Available from Primary immunodeficiency: overview of management; 2020 https://www.uptodate.com/contents/primary-immunodeficiency-overview-of-management
  » https://www.uptodate.com/contents/primary-immunodeficiency-overview-of-management
• ¹⁵
  Fasth A, Budapest, Hungary, October European Society for Immune Deficiency; 2006.
• ¹⁶
  Orange JS, Hossny EM, Weiler CR, Ballow M, Berger M, Bonilla FA, et al. Use of intravenous immunoglobulin in human disease: a review of evidence by members of the Primary Immunodeficiency Committee of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;117:S525-53.
• ¹⁷
  Winkelstein JA, Marino MC, Ochs H, Fuleihan R, Scholl PR, Geha R, et al. The X-linked hyper-IgM syndrome: clinical and immunologic features of 79 patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 2003;82:373-84.
• ¹⁸
  Paris K, Sorensen RU. Assessment and clinical interpretation of polysaccharide antibody responses. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2007;99:462-4.
• ¹⁹
  Wakim M, Alazard M, Yajima A, Speights D, Saxon A, Stiehm ER. High dose intravenous immunoglobulin in atopic dermatitis and hyper-IgE syndrome. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1998;81:153-8.
• ²⁰
  Conley ME, Saragoussi D, Notarangelo L, Etzioni A, Casanova JL. PAGID; ESID. An international study examining therapeutic options used in treatment of Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome. Clin Immunol. 2003;109:272-7.
• ²¹
  Litzman J, Jones A, Hann I, Chapel H, Strobel S, Morgan G. Intravenous immunoglobulin, splenectomy, and antibiotic prophylaxis in Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome. Arch Dis Child. 1996;75:436-9.
• ²²
  Nowak-Wegrzyn A, Crawford TO, Winkelstein JA, Carson KA, Lederman HM. Immunodeficiency and infections in ataxia-telangiectasia. J Pediatr. 2004;144:505-11.
• ²³
  Björkander J, Hammarström L, Smith CI, Buckley RH, Cunningham-Rundles C, Hanson LA. Immunoglobulin prophylaxis in patients with antibody deficiency syndromes and anti-IgA antibodies. J Clin Immunol. 1987;7:8-15.
• ²⁴
  Goudouris ES, Rego Silva AM, Ouricuri AL, Grumach AS, Condino-Neto A, Costa-Carvalho BT, et al. II Brazilian Consensus on the use of human immunoglobulin in patients with primary immunodeficiencies. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2017;15:1-16.
• ²⁵
  Nelson RP, Ballow M. 26. Immunomodulation and immunotherapy: drugs, cytokines, cytokine receptors, and antibodies. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;111:S720-43.
• ²⁶
  Roifman CM, Levison H, Gelfand EW. High-dose versus low-dose intravenous immunoglobulin in hypogammaglobulinaemia and chronic lung disease. Lancet. 1987;1:1075-7.
• ²⁷
  Roifman CM, Schroeder H, Berger M, Sorensen R, Ballow M, Buckley RH, et al. Comparison of the efficacy of IGIV-C, 10% (caprylate/chromatography) and IGIV-SD, 10% as replacement therapy in primary immune deficiency. A randomized double-blind trial. Int Immunopharmacol. 2003;3:1325-33.
• ²⁸
  Gelfand EW, Reid B, Roifman CM. Intravenous immune serum globulin replacement in hypogammaglobulinemia. A comparison of high- versus low-dose therapy. Monogr Allergy. 1988;23:177-86.
• ²⁹
  Eijkhout HW, van Der Meer JW, Kallenberg CG, Weening RS, van Dissel JT, Sanders LA, et al. The effect of two different dosages of intravenous immunoglobulin on the incidence of recurrent infections in patients with primary hypogammaglobulinemia. A randomized, double-blind, multicenter crossover trial. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135:165-74.
• ³⁰
  Berger M, Pinciaro PJ. Flebogamma 5% Investigators. Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of Flebogamma 5% [immune globulin intravenous (human)] for replacement therapy in primary immunodeficiency diseases. J Clin Immunol. 2004;24:389-96.
• ³¹
  Castagnoli R, Delmonte OM, Calzoni E. Notarangelo LD. hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in primary immunodeficiency diseases: current status and future perspectives. Front Pediatr. 2019;7:295.
• ³²
  Bach F, Albertini R, Joo P, Anderson J, Bortin M. Bone-marrow transplantation in a patient with the Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome. Lancet. 1968;292:1364-6.
• ³³
  Gatti R, Meuwissen H, Allen H, Hong R, Good R. Immunological reconstitution of sex-linked lymphopenic immunological deficiency. Lancet. 1968;292:1366-9.
• ³⁴
  Heimall J, Logan BR, Cowan MJ, Notarangelo LD, Griffith LM, Puck JM, et al. Immune reconstitution and survival of 100 SCID patients posthematopoietic cell transplant: a PIDTC natural history study. Blood. 2017;130:2718-27.
• ³⁵
  Gennery AR, Slatter MA, Grandin L, Taupin P, Cant AJ, Veys P, et al. Transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells and long-term survival for primary immunodeficiencies in Europe: entering a new century, do we do better?. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;126:602-10.
• ³⁶
  Braun CJ, Boztug K, Paruzynski A, Witzel M, Schwarzer A, Rothe M, et al. Gene therapy for Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome--long-term efficacy and genotoxicity. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:227ra33.
• ³⁷
  Hacein-Bey-Abina S, Hauer J, Lim A, Picard C, Wang GP, Berry CC, et al. Efficacy of gene therapy for X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:355-64.
• ³⁸
  Aiuti A, Biasco L, Scaramuzza S, Ferrua F, Cicalese MP, Baricordi C, et al. Lentiviral hematopoietic stem cell gene therapy in patients with Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome. Science. 2013;341:1233151.
• ³⁹
  Mamcarz E, Zhou S, Lockey T, Abdelsamed H, Cross SJ, Kang G, et al. Lentiviral gene therapy combined with low-dose busulfan in infants with SCID-X1. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:1525-34.
• ⁴⁰
  Shaw KL, Garabedian E, Mishra S, Barman P, Davila A, Carbonaro D, et al. Clinical efficacy of gene-modified stem cells in adenosine deaminase-deficient immunodeficiency. J Clin Invest. 2017;127:1689-99.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  26 Apr 2021
• Date of issue
  Mar-Apr 2021

History

• Received
  26 Sept 2020
• Accepted
  5 Oct 2020
• Published
  9 Nov 2020