DENTISTS' KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE REGARDING LEPROSY IN AN ENDEMIC AREA IN BRAZIL

SUMMARY

This study aims to analyze the dental surgeons' knowledge about leprosy and its ways of transmission, clinical characteristics and treatment, besides analyzing their experience with respect to diagnostic suspicion and case referrals. The study population comprised 242 dental surgeons working in the public dental service of the city of Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil. A self-applicable questionnaire containing questions about the dental surgeon's profile was used, including his/her knowledge on leprosy, as well as his/her practices concerning the disease. The results showed a predominance of female dental surgeons (65.7%), with ages ranging between 30 and 39 years old (43%) and professionals having six to 10 years of experience since graduation. Concerning their time working in the Unified Health System (SUS), the highest percentage of dental surgeons referred more than 10 years. Regarding the knowledge about the disease, 30.6% did not know the efficacy of the treatment of leprosy, 47% did not know the disease had to be notified compulsorily and only 8.3% had received information about leprosy at work. Besides that, most of them mentioned feeling little security when treating patients with leprosy (61.6%). Thus, dental surgeons' deficient knowledge on issues related to leprosy may be highlighted.

KEYWORDS:
Leprosy; Attitude of health personnel

INTRODUCTION

Leprosy is considered one of the great public health problems in Brazil, which is the second country in the world with respect to absolute number of leprosy cases. The distribution of disease is quite irregular and follows the poverty map, with higher prevalence in the northern, northeastern and nid-western regions. In 2010 there were 18.2 new cases per 100,000 inhabitants. The disease is considered hyper endemic in the state of Mato Grosso, which ranks first in the detection of new cases, with an estimate of 81.6 cases per 100,000 inhabitants¹.

Leprosy is considered a priority by the World Health Organization (WHO) due to its disabling power, as it marginalizes millions of patients and interrupts their productive capability², leading to suffering not only caused by the pain and sickness but also by the social and psychological impact on the patient³.

It is a compulsory notification disease due to its magnitude and transcendence, as it is transmissible and causes deformities, although it can be treated and controlled⁴.

The diagnosis of leprosy is made through the identification of skin lesions with loss of sensitivity, which can appear in any part of the body, including the nasal mucosa and the oral cavity⁵. Prioritizing practices that contribute to the early diagnosis of leprosy are fundamental to the disease control, thus it is important that all the health professionals know its signs and symptoms⁶.

In this context, the dental surgeon should participate in the diagnosis of leprosy and in the care of the patients, regardless if the cases are new or old cases⁷. In the dental practice, whenever there is a suspicion of leprosy, the clinical examination should extend beyond the oral maxillofacial complex, allowing the recognition of signs and symptoms from any region of the body through the gathering of information about the patient's general health⁸.

Regarding leprosy, the Ministry of Health recommends that members of the oral health teams of the Family Health Strategy Program develop actions and educational activities to prevent the disease, treat it, fight its stigma, inform patients about medication adverse effects and prevent disabilities, contributing to the epidemiological surveillance².

A broader view in the dental care services may contribute to the improvement of the individual's and the community's health condition. Cases of suspected leprosy should be referred by the dental surgeons to a diagnostic confirmation⁹. Dental surgeons' and other health professionals' little knowledge about the disease is highlighted among the factors that have worsen the leprosy control. This stems from the fact that teaching the subject at university undergraduate and graduate programs and public health services has been overlooked even in countries where the disease is endemic¹⁰.

Assessment of dental surgeons' knowledge and experience of leprosy is scarce^9,11. Based on the stated above, the aim of this study is to analyze the dental surgeons' knowledge on leprosy, its ways of transmission, clinical characteristics, treatment and care given to patients, as well as his/her experiences with diagnostic suspicion and referral.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was conducted in accordance with the requirements of Resolution 466/12 of the National Board of Health and was approved by the Research in Humans Ethics Committee of Araçatuba Dental School - Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP, state of São Paulo, Brazil (process number 36331714.0.0000.5420/2014).

This is a cross-sectional exploratory study carried out in the public dental services of Cuiabá, the capital city of the state of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Cuiabá's estimated population in 2015 was 580,489 inhabitants and its urban area is subdivided into four administrative regions: north, south, east and west¹². The organizational structure of Unified Health System (SUS) is comprised of 92 Basic Health Units (UBS), 63 Family Health Strategy Programs (ESF), 10 Dental Care Units (UAO) and seven Dental Specialty Centers (CEO).

The dental surgeons participating in the study worked in the basic care and at the CEOs in the city. The professionals out of work due to health problems, vacation or because they were carrying out administrative duties at the Municipal Health Department were excluded from the study.

Data collection was performed between January and March 2015. Interviews were carried out by one trained researcher, during the working hours. The dental surgeons who agreed to participate in the study signed an informed consent form.

A self-applicable questionnaire with objective questions was used. A pilot study with 20 dental surgeons who worked in the administrative sector of the Department of Health was previously carried out so that the questions of the survey were adjusted to improve the understanding of the research and its aims.

The questions used concerned the characterization of the sample (sex, age group, time since graduation and time working for SUS, type of work and training in a specialization program), knowledge of leprosy, where the knowledge was acquired, knowledge of the existence of a relationship between dentistry and leprosy, participation in programmed actions against the disease, and dental care of patients with leprosy.

The dependent variable "suspicion and referral of a leprosy case", was associated with the variables "time since graduation", "time working for SUS" and "compulsory notification of leprosy". The variable "efficacy of multidrug therapy (MDT) against the disease transmissibility" was associated with the variable "level of safety felt in the dental care of patients with leprosy".

The data obtained from the sociodemographic and disease characteristics variables were described as frequencies. As for the statistical analysis, a bivariate analysis with Chi-square test with significance level of 5% was carried out to identify the most significant differences in the variables studied. The SPSS software, version 21.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) was used.

RESULTS

The sample of the study comprised 297 dental surgeons, 106 worked under an employment contract and 191 were public servants. From those, 242 (81.5%) answered the questionnaire, and the majority was female (65.7%), aged between 30 and 39 years old (43%) and had graduated 6 to 10 years earlier (23.6%). Regarding the time working for SUS, the highest percentage (28.1%) of professionals had been working there for more than 10 years, acting in both, the private practice and also in the public dental service (68.2%). Furthermore, 82.2% were specialists.

Concerning the knowledge of leprosy, only 13 (5.4%) of the professionals could not define the disease. However, wrong answers, such as "disease caused by a fungus or by the tsetse fly" were observed. Most of them answered correctly that it is an "infectious-contagious disease affecting the skin and nerves" (63.2%), whose transmission occurred through the airway and prolonged contact with a sick person (54.1%). However, 30.6% did not know about the efficacy of MDT, 47% did not know that the disease had to be compulsorily notified and only 8.3% had obtained information about the disease at work. Furthermore, 72.8% believed that there was no relationship between dentistry and leprosy, 95.9% had never taken part in activities of permanent education about leprosy, but 27.3% had already given dental care to leprosy patients.

The bivariate analysis found a significant statistical association between the suspicion or referral of leprosy cases and the time since graduation (p = 0.02), as well as with the time working at the public health service (p = 0.003) and with the knowledge that leprosy is a compulsory notification disease (p = 0.001).

MDT was considered effective to reduce the disease transmission by 74.7% of the professionals, however, most of them reported feeling little security regarding the dental care of leprosy patients (61.6%).

DISCUSSION

Dental surgeons working in the public health service, in an area where leprosy is endemic need to have a deeper knowledge about the disease so that suspected cases will be adequately referred for treatment. It is of fundamental importance that the dermatological and neurological aspects related to the early clinical manifestation of the disease are known by the dental professional, so that they can contribute to increase the diagnosis of the disease^9,13.

Even though the great majority of dental surgeons has claimed that they know what leprosy is, the disease was described in a simplified way, being related only to skin depigmentation caused by bacteria. It is important to emphasize that some professionals affirmed that it is a disease transmitted by a fly or a fungus, demonstrating their lack of understanding about the causative agent. In previous studies a simplistic definition of the disease, highlighting only the skin blemishes, was also observed^9,14,15.

Table 1
Characteristics of the studied professionals, Cuiabá, 2015

Variables	n	%
Sex
Male	83	34.3
Female	159	65.7
Age Group
20 to 29 years old	46	19.0
30 to 39 years old	104	43.0
40 to 49 years old	63	26.0
50 years old or over	29	12.0
Time since graduation
Less than 1 year	9	3.7
From 1 to 5 years	33	13.6
From 6 to 10 years	57	23.6
From 11 to 15 years	63	26.0
From 16 to 20 years	45	18.6
Over 20 years	35	14.5
Time of work at SUS
Less than 1 year	55	22.7
From 1 to 3 years	30	12.4
From 4 to 6 years	40	16.5
From 7 to 10 years	49	20.3
Over 10 years	68	28.1
Type of work
Only public service	77	31.8
Private practice and public service	165	68.2
Specialization
Yes	199	82.2
No	43	17.8

In this study, the graduation in dentistry was the main source of knowledge about leprosy among the dental surgeons, a finding that disagrees with other studies^9,14, in which the main sources of information were the media and the workplace.

Dental professionals should not restrict their examination to the signs and symptoms related exclusively to the oral cavity, but rather participate in the identification of the problems that different population groups have in their working area and also take part in multidisciplinary and intersectoral teams¹⁶. In the present study, a small portion of the respondents affirmed having acquired their knowledge about leprosy at the workplace, a result that suggests poor information exchange about the subject in the health sector.

Table 2
Knowledge of leprosy by dental surgeons, Cuiabá, 2015

Variables	n	%
Definition of leprosy
Infectious contagious disease affecting skin and nerves	153	63.2
Skin disease	43	17.7
Disease caused by a bacillus	24	10
Disease caused by poor hygiene	7	2.9
Disease caused by a fungus	1	0.4
Disease caused by the tsetse fly	1	0.4
Does not know	13	5.4
Transmission of leprosy
Prolonged contact with a sick person	72	29.8
Airway	59	24.3
Direct contact with the lesion	28	11.6
Contact with body fluids	22	9.1
Contact with contaminated objects	16	6.6
Tsetse fly bite	1	0.4
Does not know	44	18.2
Leprosy treatment is efficient
Yes	168	69.4
No	15	6.2
Does not know	59	24.4
Knowledge about leprosy compulsory notification
Yes	128	53
No	114	47
Where learned about leprosy
Media	69	28.5
Personal readings	58	24
Workplace	20	8.3
Graduation	70	28.9
Scientific paper	2	0.8
Courses	5	2.1
Did not get information	18	7.4
Relationship between dentistry and leprosy
Existent	66	27.3
Non existent	176	72.7
Programmed actions about leprosy
Participated	10	4.1
Never participated	232	95.9
Given dental care to leprosy patients
Yes	66	27.3
No	99	40.9
Does not know	77	31.8

Table 3
Bivariate analysis of suspicion of leprosy and the dental surgeons' profile and knowledge, Cuiabá, 2015

Variables	Have you ever suspected of or referred any leprosy case?				p-value
	Yes		No
	n	%	n	%
Time since graduation
Less than 1 year	1	2.7	8	3.9	0.02*
From 1 to 5 years	4	10.8	29	14.1
From 6 to 10 years	4	10.8	53	25.9
From 11 to 15 years	7	18.9	56	27.3
From 16 to 20 years	9	24.3	36	17.6
Over 20 years	12	32.5	23	11.2
Time working at SUS
Less than 1 year	4	10.8	51	24.9	0.003*
From 1 to 3 years	4	10.8	26	12.7
From 4 to 6 years	6	16.2	34	16.6
From 7 to 10 years	3	8.1	46	22.4
Over 10 years	20	54.1	48	23.4
Is leprosy a compulsory notification disease?
Yes	56	71.8	72	43.9	0.001*
No	22	28.2	92	56.1

• *maximum likelihood ratio.

Table 4
Bivariate analysis of the knowledge of the efficacy of leprosy treatment and dentists’ safety feeling in treating leprosy patients, Cuiabá, 2015.

• *maximum likelihood ratio.

Mycobacteryum leprae transmission occurs through the upper airways, and the probability of infection is influenced by the duration of the contact with infected people, by the severity of infection and by the degree of the organism resistance¹¹. Most dental surgeons in this study answered correctly that the transmission occurred by means of direct contact through the air, as reported in other studies^14,17-19.

MDT is considered the most important treatment to leprosy and was introduced in Brazil in 1986. A patient on MDT no longer transmits the disease right after the first doses, becoming thus unable to infect other people²⁰. A study carried out with medical students about their knowledge on leprosy showed that a little portion of the interviewees were aware of the efficacy of MDT¹⁵. In the present study, although most dentists considered MDT effective to reduce the disease transmission, most of the respondents affirmed that they felt insecure treating leprosy patients, a finding in agreement with that of other studies⁹.

The importance and the possibility of involving dental surgeons in the actions to control leprosy through their ability to identify suspicious skin lesions and refer the patient to other health professionals was reported in another study⁹. In this study, few dental surgeons suspected of leprosy or referred patients to other health professionals, a finding that is in agreement with other studies^9,14.

Leprosy is a compulsory notification disease (CND) in Brazil and investigation is mandatory, thus the case notification forms must be filled in by health professionals in the units in which there is a case suspicion or diagnosis confirmation⁴. A high percentage of dentists did not know that leprosy is a compulsory notification disease, so that under-notification is a real possibility. Furthermore, as the studied area is endemic for leprosy and few dental surgeons affirmed having treated or referred a patient suspected of having leprosy, it is likely that leprosy cases have been missed.

Time since graduation and time working at the public health service have influenced the increase in the number of suspicion and referral of leprosy cases by the dental surgeons in Cuiabá. This demonstrates that the experience acquired through the years of work allows the questioning and analysis of the patient as a whole, with an assessment of his/her general health and the improvement of the health team performance. Leprosy has to be studied in a multidisciplinary and multifactorial way. It should be taught in undergraduate health programs, and to health professionals working at basic health units. They should be given training in their workplace. If these measures are not adopted, there is little likelihood of reducing the incidence of disease in the coming years²¹.

Concerning the relationship between leprosy and oral health, it is important to emphasize that there are no pathognomonic lesions of leprosy^22,23; however, several studies have demonstrated the presence of oral lesions in patients with leprosy at varied percentages. There is high prevalence of chronic inflammatory periodontal disease in patients with leprosy due to the presence of Mycobacterium leprae in the gingival mucosa^24. This information was not known by the professionals interviewed in this study, who reported having performed only a few programmed evaluations of leprosy patients.

It is evident that dental professionals need to develop not only competences related to the techniques and practices of the dental profession, but also those directed to the patient. The dental surgeon can and should contribute to prevent and control leprosy, take part in health education campaigns and understand his/her role in the epidemiological surveillance actions and in public health programs^10,11,14.

In conclusion, dental surgeons' deficient knowledge about leprosy stands out. It is necessary to deepen the dental surgeons' knowledge about leprosy, so that they become multiplying agents of information on leprosy, favoring the early diagnosis and treatment of the disease.

REFERENCES

• ¹
  Ignotti E, Paula RC. Situação epidemiológica da hanseníase no Brasil: análise de indicadores selecionados no período de 2001 a 2010. In: Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Departamento de Análise de Situação em Saúde. Saúde Brasil 2010: uma análise da situação de saúde e de evidências selecionadas de impacto de ações de vigilância em saúde. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2011. [cited 2015 Oct 14]. Available from: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/saude_brasil_2010.pdf
• ²
  Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Departamento de Atenção Básica. Vigilância em saúde: dengue, esquistossomose, hanseníase, malária, tracoma e tuberculose. 2ª ed. rev. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2008. [cited 2015 Oct 14]. Available from: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/cab_n21_vigilancia_saude_2ed_p1.pdf
• ³
  Garbin CA, Garbin AJ, Carloni ME, Rovida TA, Martins RJ. The stigma and prejudice of leprosy: influence on the human condition. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2015;48:194-201.
• ⁴
  Penna GO, Domingues CM, Siqueira Jr JB, Elkhoury AN, Cechinel MP, Grossi MA, et al. Doenças dermatológicas de notificação compulsória no Brasil. An Bras Dermatol. 2011;86:865-77.
• ⁵
  Rao PV. Clinical diagnosis of leprosy cases. J Indian Med Assoc. 2006;104:676-9.
• ⁶
  Ignotti E, Andrade VL, Sabroza PC, Araujo AJ. Estudo da adesão ao tratamento da hanseníase no município de Duque de Caxias, Rio de Janeiro: abandonos ou abandonados. Hansenol Int. 2001;26:23-30.
• ⁷
  Lima IB, Simpson CA, Cabral AM. Limitação de atividades e participação social em pacientes com hanseníase. Rev Enferm UFPE. 2014;8:994-1001.
• ⁸
  Almeida CA, Zimmermann RD, Cerveira JG, Julivaldo FS. Prontuário odontológico - uma orientação para o cumprimento da exigência contida no inciso VIII do art. 5o do Código de Ética Odontológica: relatório final apresentado ao Conselho Federal de Odontologia pela Comissão Especial instituída pela Portaria CFO-SEC-26, de 24 de julho de 2002. Rio de Janeiro; 2004. [cited 2015 Oct 14]. Available from: http://cfo.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/prontuario_2004.pdf
  » http://cfo.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/prontuario_2004.pdf
• ⁹
  Cortela DCB, Ignotti E. Conhecimento e experiências do cirurgião-dentista sobre hanseníase em Cáceres, MT, Brasil. Rev Odonto Cienc. 2008; 3:243-50.
• ¹⁰
  Cid RD, Lima GG, Souza AR, Moura AD. Percepção de usuários sobre o preconceito da hanseníase. Rev RENE. 2012;13:1004-14.
• ¹¹
  Russo MP, Corrêa CT, Martins MA, Martins MD. Aspectos da doença de Hansen relevantes para o cirurgião-dentista: revisão da literatura. Rev Odonto Cienc. 2005;20:126-31.
• ¹²
  Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Cidades@: Mato Grosso, Cuiabá. [cited 2015 Oct 14]. Available from: http://cidades.ibge.gov.br/xtras/perfil.php?codmun=510340
  » http://cidades.ibge.gov.br/xtras/perfil.php?codmun=510340
• ¹³
  Souza CS. Hanseniase: formas clínicas e diagnóstico diferencial. Medicina (Ribeirão Preto). 1997;30:325-34.
• ¹⁴
  Almeida JR, Alencar CH, Barbosa JC, Dias AA, Almeida ME. Contribuição do cirurgião-dentista no controle da hanseníase. Cad Saude Colet. 2011;19:271-7.
• ¹⁵
  Rodrigues CC, Berto J, Nassif PW, Nassif AE. Análise dos conhecimentos a respeito da hanseníase em acadêmicos de medicina. Braz J Surg Clin Res. 2013;4:23-7.
• ¹⁶
  Aerts D, Abegg C, Cesa K. O papel do cirurgião-dentista no Sistema Único de Saúde. Ciênc Saude Colet. 2004;9:131-8.
• ¹⁷
  Pontes AR, Almeida MG, Xavier MB, Quaresma AS, Yassei EA. Detecção do DNA de Mycobacterium leprae em secreção nasal. Rev Bras Enferm. 2008;61 n. spe:734-7.
• ¹⁸
  Silva Jr FG, Ferreira RD, Araújo OD, Camêlo SM, Nery IS. Assistência de enfermagem ao portador de Hanseníase: abordagem transcultural. Rev Bras Enferm. 2008;61 n. spe:713-7.
• ¹⁹
  Dessunti EM, Soubhia Z, Alves E, Aranda CM, Barro MP. Hanseníase: o controle dos contatos no município de Londrina-PR em um período de dez anos. Rev Bras Enferm. 2008;61 n. spe:689-93.
• ²⁰
  Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Gabinete do Ministro. Portaria nº 3.125, de 7 de outubro de 2010. Aprova as diretrizes para vigilância, atenção e controle da hanseníase. [cited 2015 Oct 14]. Available from: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/gm/2010/prt3125_07_10_2010.html
  » http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/gm/2010/prt3125_07_10_2010.html
• ²¹
  Virmond MC. A hanseníase após a eliminação. Hansenol Int. 2012;37:7-8.
• ²²
  Diallo B, Bourgeois D, Coudert JL. Evolution of the orofacial and dental status of a population of leprosy patients treated with multidrug therapy in Senegal. Acta Leprol. 1992;8:11-5.
• ²³
  de Abreu MA, Michalany NS, Weckx LL, Neto Pimentel DR, Hirata CH, de Avelar Alchorne MM. The oral mucosa in leprosy: a clinical and histopathological study. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;72:312-6.
• ²⁴
  Aarestrup FM, Aquino MA, Castro JM, Nascimento DN. Doença periodontal em hansenianos. Periodontia. 1995;4:191-3.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  2016

History

• Received
  06 Jan 2016
• Accepted
  13 May 2016