Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Visitantes florais de Erythrina speciosa Andr. (Leguminosae)

Flowering visitors of Erythrina speciosa Andr., Leguminosae

Resumo

Inspite of Etythrina species exhibit morphologic attributes for adaptation to pollination by nectarivorous birds mentioned in the literature, E. speciosa is pollinated by lots of bees (Apinae and Meliponinae) which show a great urban occurrence. Systems of E. speciosa floral reproduction, fenology, diversity, frequency and constancy of insects visiting at different hours and flowering periods were studied. E. speciosa is Biocompatible, but xenogamy is the predominant system of reproduction. A large diversity of insects visiting the inflorescences was observed, with predominance of bees. The bee species showed a higher frequency: Apis mellifera Linnaeus, 1758 (45,0 %), Trigona spinipes (Fabricius, 1793) (28,6%), Trigona hyalinata (Lepeletier, 1836) (12,2 %) and the ant Zacryptoceruspusillus Klug, 1824 (2,8 %). Constant but not frequent were the bees (Apidae) Plebeia droryana (Friese, 1900), Friesella schrottkyi (Friese, 1900), Nannotrigona testaceicornis (Lepeletier, 1836), Tetragonisca angustula (Latreille, 1811), the wasps (Vespidae) Polybia paulista Ihering, 1896, Protopolybia exigua (de Saussure, 1854), Agelaia pallipes (Olivier. 1791), the ant (Formicidae) Pseudomyrmex sp. and the beetle (Chrysomelidae) Diabrotica speciosa (Germar, 1824). E. speciosa flowers were visited by hummingbirds (Trochilidae): Eupetomena macroura (Gmelin, 1788), Clorostilbon aureoventris (d'Orbigny & Lafresnaye, 1838) and Amazilia sp. The birds Passer domeslicus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Ploceidae) and Coereba flaveola (Linnaeus, 1758) (Emberizidac), also are present. The frequency and insect distribution were influenced by ambiental factors. Temperature, light, time, barometric pressure, relative humidity and wind velocity were significantly correlated with insect numbers. There is a visit sequence, by floral resource disponibility during the day, conditioned by transport ability, insect numbers and colony necessity, which begins by A. mellifera followed by meliponid bees. These bees make the pollination when they collect the pollen. There is a great animal variety which are sustained by flowers. It is suggested that E. speciosa is one important food source for urban fauna in winter, and so it should be utilized more frequently in streets, parks and gardens arborization.

Pollination; Erythrina speciosa; bee; fenology; floral visitors


Pollination; Erythrina speciosa; bee; fenology; floral visitors

Visitantes Florais de Erythrina speciosa Andr. (Leguminosae)

Flowering Visitors of Erythrina speciosa Andr., Leguminosae

Maria J. Vitali-VeigaI; Vera L.L. MachadoI,II

ICentro de Estudos de Insetos Sociais, Universidade Estadual Paulista. Avenida 24-A 1515, Caixa Postal 199, 13506-900 Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brasil

ABSTRACT

Inspite of Etythrina species exhibit morphologic attributes for adaptation to pollination by nectarivorous birds mentioned in the literature, E. speciosa is pollinated by lots of bees (Apinae and Meliponinae) which show a great urban occurrence. Systems of E. speciosa floral reproduction, fenology, diversity, frequency and constancy of insects visiting at different hours and flowering periods were studied. E. speciosa is Biocompatible, but xenogamy is the predominant system of reproduction. A large diversity of insects visiting the inflorescences was observed, with predominance of bees. The bee species showed a higher frequency: Apis mellifera Linnaeus, 1758 (45,0 %), Trigona spinipes (Fabricius, 1793) (28,6%), Trigona hyalinata (Lepeletier, 1836) (12,2 %) and the ant Zacryptoceruspusillus Klug, 1824 (2,8 %). Constant but not frequent were the bees (Apidae) Plebeia droryana (Friese, 1900), Friesella schrottkyi (Friese, 1900), Nannotrigona testaceicornis (Lepeletier, 1836), Tetragonisca angustula (Latreille, 1811), the wasps (Vespidae) Polybia paulista Ihering, 1896, Protopolybia exigua (de Saussure, 1854), Agelaia pallipes (Olivier. 1791), the ant (Formicidae) Pseudomyrmex sp. and the beetle (Chrysomelidae) Diabrotica speciosa (Germar, 1824). E. speciosa flowers were visited by hummingbirds (Trochilidae): Eupetomena macroura (Gmelin, 1788), Clorostilbon aureoventris (d'Orbigny & Lafresnaye, 1838) and Amazilia sp. The birds Passer domeslicus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Ploceidae) and Coereba flaveola (Linnaeus, 1758) (Emberizidac), also are present. The frequency and insect distribution were influenced by ambiental factors. Temperature, light, time, barometric pressure, relative humidity and wind velocity were significantly correlated with insect numbers. There is a visit sequence, by floral resource disponibility during the day, conditioned by transport ability, insect numbers and colony necessity, which begins by A. mellifera followed by meliponid bees. These bees make the pollination when they collect the pollen. There is a great animal variety which are sustained by flowers. It is suggested that E. speciosa is one important food source for urban fauna in winter, and so it should be utilized more frequently in streets, parks and gardens arborization.

Key words: Pollination, Erythrina speciosa, bee, fenology, floral visitors

Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.

Full text available only in PDF format.

AGRADECIMENTOS. Ao Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) pelo auxílio financeiro. Ao Prof. Dr. José Manuel Macário Rebelo pelo valioso auxílio na identificação de algumas abelhas. Ao Prof. Dr. Antônio Fuiian e a Profa. Flávia Cristina Pinto Garcia pela identificação da espécie da planta estudada. Aos Profs. Dr. José Sílvio Govoni e Dr. Antônio Carlos Simões Pião pelo auxílio estatístico.

Recebido em 01.VII.1999; aceito em 10.IV.2000.

  • Corrêa, M.P. 1969. Dicionário das Plantas Úteis do Brasil e das Exóticas Cultivadas. Rio de Janeiro, Irmãos Di Giorgio & Cia Ltda Ed., 765p.
  • Crestana, C.S.M. & J.B. Baitello. 1988. Biologia floral de Nectandra mollis (H.b.k.) NEES ssp. Oppositifolia (NEES) Hohwer (Lauraceae) na estação experimental de Moji-Guaçú, Estado de São Paulo. Bol. Técn. If. São Paulo 42: 121-137.
  • Faegri, K. & van der Pijl. 1979. The principies of pollination ecology. Oxford, Pergamon Press, 224p.
  • Hernandez, H.M. & V.M. Toledo. 1979. The role of nectar robbers and pollinators in the reproduction of Erythrina leptorhiza. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 66: 512-520.
  • Inouye, D.W. 1980. The terminology of floral lacerny. Ecology 61: 1251-1253.
  • Iwama, S.A. 1977. A influência dos fatores climáticos na atividade externa de Tetragonisca angustula (Apidae, Meliponinae). Bol. Zool. Univ. São Paulo 2: 189-201.
  • Ludwig, J.A. & J.F. Reynolds. 1988. Statistical Ecology: a primer on methods and computing. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 337p.
  • Neill, D.A. 1988. Experimental studies on species relationships in Erythrina - Papilionoideae. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 75: 886-969.
  • Oliveira-Filho, A.T. & L.C.A. Oliveira. 1988. Biologia floral de uma população de Solanum lycocarpum St Hil (Solanaceae) em Lavras, MG. Rev. Bras. Bot. 11: 23-32.
  • Radford, A.E.; W.C. Dickinson; I.R. Massay Jr. & C.R. Bell. 1974. Vascular Plants Systematics. New York, Harper & Row, 891p.
  • Raven, P.H. 1979. Erythrina (Fabaceae: Faboideae): Introduction to symposium III. Ann. Missouri Bot. Garden 66:417-421.
  • Rizzini, C.T. 1977. Plantas Ornamentais. Rio de Janeiro, IBGE, 70p.
  • Schultz, A.R. 1963. Introdução ao Estudo da Botânica Sistemática. Porto Alegre, Ed. Globo S.A., 427p.
  • Siegel, S. 1977. Estatística não paramétrica (para as Ciências do Comportamento). Rio de Janeiro, Editora McGraw Hill Ltda, 350p.
  • Wagner, H.O. 1946. Food and Feeding habits of Mexican Hummingbirds. Willson Bull. 58: 69-93.

Datas de Publicação

  • Publicação nesta coleção
    12 Maio 2009
  • Data do Fascículo
    Jun 2000

Histórico

  • Aceito
    10 Abr 2000
  • Recebido
    01 Jul 1999
Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia Caixa Postal 19020, 81531-980 Curitiba PR Brasil, Tel./Fax: +55 41 3266-6823, - Curitiba - PR - Brazil
E-mail: sbz@bio.ufpr.br