Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Dimorfismo em machos de Euglossa mandibularis Friese (Apidae, Euglossina)

Male dimorphism in Euglossa mandibularis Friese (Apidae, Euglossina)

Resumo

Males of Euglossa mandibularis Friese, 1899 can be categorized by (1) presence or (2) absence of scutellar tuft (a morphological feature of dense setae found in females' scutellum of the genera Euglossa Latreille, 1802 and Eulaema Lepeletier, 1841). A multivariate statistical analysis using six morphological measures (hindtibia length and width, head width, intertegular span, midbasitarsus length and scape length) show that males of the categories 1 and 2 were significantly different in relation to such measures. The width head, hindtibia length and scape length were the measures that most influenced the observed differences. Levene test suggest there is not effect of stabilizing selection on males without scutellar tuft. Since there is a fluctuation in the proportion of males with scutellar tuft occurring in a single population, the observed morphological differences might be environmentally determined.

Apidae; Euglossini; Euglossa; male dimorphism


Apidae; Euglossini; Euglossa; male dimorphism

COMUNICAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA

Dimorfismo em machos de Euglossa mandibularis Friese (Apidae, Euglossina)

Male dimorphism in Euglossa mandibularis Friese (Apidae, Euglossina)

Rui Carlos Peruquetti

Laboratório de Genética Bioquímica, Departamento de Genética e Evolução, Universidade Federal de São Carlos. Caixa Postal 676, 13567-905 São Carlos, São Paulo, Brasil. E-mail: prcp@iris.ufscar.br

ABSTRACT

Males of Euglossa mandibularis Friese, 1899 can be categorized by (1) presence or (2) absence of scutellar tuft (a morphological feature of dense setae found in females' scutellum of the genera Euglossa Latreille, 1802 and Eulaema Lepeletier, 1841). A multivariate statistical analysis using six morphological measures (hindtibia length and width, head width, intertegular span, midbasitarsus length and scape length) show that males of the categories 1 and 2 were significantly different in relation to such measures. The width head, hindtibia length and scape length were the measures that most influenced the observed differences. Levene test suggest there is not effect of stabilizing selection on males without scutellar tuft. Since there is a fluctuation in the proportion of males with scutellar tuft occurring in a single population, the observed morphological differences might be environmentally determined.

Key words: Apidae, Euglossini, Euglossa, male dimorphism

Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.

Full text available only in PDF format.

AGRADECIMENTOS. Gostaria de agradecer ao Sr. Geraldo Paiva pelo auxílio no trabalho de campo. À Patrícia Santos Ferreira-Peruquetti e Daniele Boraschi pela leitura da primeira versão do manuscrito e pelas sugestões apresentadas. Aos consultores anônimos da RBZ pelas sugestões que contribuíram muito para a melhoria do trabalho. Este trabalho foi financiado em parte pela FAPEMIG. A FAPESP contribuiu com o auxílio financeiro (Proc. 98/16390-0) durante a redação do manuscrito.

Recebido em 13.V.2002; aceito em 29.X.2002.

  • Alcock, J. 1995. Body size and its effect on male-male competition in Hylaeus alcyoneus (Hymenoptera:Colletidae). Jour. Insect Behav. 8(2):149-159.
  • Bullock, S.H. 1999. Relationships among body size, wing size and mass in bees form a tropical dry forest in México. Jour. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 72(4):426-439.
  • Cane, J.H. 1987. Estimation of bee size using intertegular span (Apoidea). Jour. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 60(1):145-147.
  • Cook, J.M. 1993. Sex determination in the Hymenoptera: a review of models and evidence. Heredity 71:421-435.
  • Danforth, B.N. & J.L. Neff. 1992. Male polymorphism and polyethism in Perdita texana (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae). Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 85(5):616-626.
  • Eltz, T.; W.M. Whitten; D.W. Roubik & K.E. Linsenmair. 1999. Fragrance collection, storage, and accumulation by individual male orchid bees. Jour. Chem. Ecol. 25(1):157-176.
  • Evoy, W.E. & B.P. Jones. 1971. Motor patterns of males euglossine bees evoked by floral fragrances. Anim. Behav. 19:583-588.
  • Kimsey, L.S. 1984. The behavioural and structural aspects of grooming and related activities in euglossine bees (Hymenoptera). Jour. Zool., London, 204:541-550.
  • ______. 1987. Generic relationships within the Euglossini (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Syst. Entomol. 12:63-72.
  • Kukuk, P.F. 1996. Male dimorphism in Lasioglossum (Chialictus) hemichalceum: the role of larval nutrition. Jour. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 69(4 suppl.):147-157.
  • Manly, B.F.J. 1994. Multivariate statistical methods. A primer. London, Chapman & Hall, 2nd ed., 215p.
  • Molumby, A. 1997. Why make daughter larger? Maternal sex-allocation and sex-dependent selection for body size in a mass-provisioning wasp, Trypoxylon politum. Behav. Ecol. 8 (3): 279-287.
  • Moure, J.S. 1967. A checklist of the known euglossine bees. Simp. Biota Amazônica, Manaus, 5:395-415.
  • ______. 1995. Notas sobre algumas espécies de abelhas da Bahia, Brasil (Hymenoptera, Apoidea). Revta bras. Zool. 12(3):467-470.
  • Owen, R.E. & L. Packer. 1994. Estimation of the proportion of diploid males in populations of Hymenoptera. Heredity 72:219-227.
  • Packer, L. & R. Owen. 2001. Population genetic aspects of pollinator decline. Conserv. Ecol. 5(1):(4) [On line] URL: http://www.consecol.org/Vol5/iss1/art4
  • Peruquetti, R.C. 2000. Function of fragrances collected by Euglossini males (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Entomol. Gener. 25(1):33-37.
  • Rust, R.W. 1991. Size-weight relationship in Osmia lignaria propinqua Cresson (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). Jour. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 64(2):174-178.
  • Soares, A.A.; L.A.O. Campos; M.F. Vieira & G.A.R. Melo. 1989. Relações entre Euglossa (Euglossella) mandibulares Friese, 1899 (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Euglossini) e Cyphomandra calycina (Solanaceae). Ciên. Cult. 41(9):903-905.
  • Takahashi, N.C; R.C. Peruquetti; M.A. del Lama & L.A.O. Campos. 2001. A reanalysis of diploid male frequencies in euglossine bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Evolution 55 (9):1897-1899.

Datas de Publicação

  • Publicação nesta coleção
    11 Maio 2009
  • Data do Fascículo
    Dez 2002

Histórico

  • Aceito
    29 Out 2002
  • Recebido
    13 Maio 2002
Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia Caixa Postal 19020, 81531-980 Curitiba PR Brasil, Tel./Fax: +55 41 3266-6823, - Curitiba - PR - Brazil
E-mail: sbz@bio.ufpr.br