Locking compression plate fixation of critical-sized bone defects in sheep. Development of a model for veterinary bone tissue engineering

ABSTRACT

Purpose

To develop a segmental tibial bone defect model for tissue engineering studies in veterinary orthopedics using single locking compression plate (LCP) fixation and cast immobilization.

Methods

A 3-cm bone defect was created in the right tibia of 18 adult Suffolk sheep. A 10-hole, 4.5-mm LCP was applied to the dorsomedial aspect of the bone. Four locking screws were inserted into the proximal and three into the distal bone fragment. Operated limbs were immobilized with casts. Animals were submitted to stall rest, but were allowed to bear weight on the operated limb. During the recovery period, animals were checked daily for physiological parameters, behavior and lameness. Follow-up radiographs were taken monthly.

Results

Surgical procedures and postoperative recovery were uneventful. Animals adapted quickly to casts and were able to bear weight on the operated limb with no signs of discomfort or distress. No clinical or radiographic complications were detected over a 90-day follow-up period.

Conclusions

Surgical creation of tibial segmental bone defects followed by fixation with single LCP and cast immobilization was deemed a feasible and appropriate model for veterinary orthopedic research in tissue engineering.

Key words
Veterinary Surgery; Animal Models; Orthopedics; Bone Regeneration

Introduction

The ovine critical-size defect model is a well-established animal model for bone healing investigation¹–³. Adult sheep are deemed well suited for translational research in biomaterials and bone engineering studies due to their docile temperament, easy handling and structural similarities between ovine and human bone⁴–⁷. Sheep are also used as experimental models in bone tissue engineering studies involving large animals⁸,⁹. Critical-sized bone defects are defects in a particular bone that will not heal spontaneously during the organism lifetime³. Critical size of tibial bone defects in ovine models range from 3 to 5 cm¹–³. Full characterization of any given model should provide information regarding defect size and location, bone geometry, whether or not periosteal stripping was performed and weight-bearing loads, as well as detailed description of preoperative and follow-up procedures. Selected fixation method, postoperative management and potential complications should also be detailed³,¹⁰.

Several fracture stabilization methods have been investigated in ovine models, the most common being external skeletal fixation (ESF), internal fixation with intramedullary pins or plate and screws, combination fixation with intramedullary pins and plates and double plating¹–³,¹¹. External fixators are user-friendly devices. However, fractures treated with this method take longer to heal, carry a higher risk of infection and are subject to relative instability¹.

Dynamic compression plates (DCP) are commonly used in ovine tibial segmental bone defect models. In spite of appropriate bending stiffness demonstrated in ex vivo biomechanical testings⁷,¹², DCPs may compromise periosteal blood supply and high screw loosening rates have been reported¹.

Locking compression plates (LCP) are modern devices which allow biomechanical forces to be transmitted through screw heads. These devices act in a similar fashion to an external fixator, with less periosteal disruption and bone damage¹³. Locking compression plates are widely used in large animal orthopedics, especially in the equine species, given their higher yield strength, greater stiffness and ability to prevent movement at the fracture site¹³,¹⁴. These plates may also be implanted using minimally invasive techniques, particularly in the distal tibial and femoral fractures¹⁵. Locking compression plates are equipped with versatile combi-holes specially designed for insertion of locking or cortical screws, at surgeon’s discretion or according to bone region¹³,¹⁶. They also provide stable fixation and do not interfere with the application of biomaterials, which may be used to enhance bone regeneration¹.

These plates have been used in combination with different postoperative management strategies (e.g., cast immobilization and suspension devices) for bone defect stabilization in sheep with different rates of complications such as plate bending and fracture¹,¹¹,¹⁷. However, different from human patients, large animals bear weight on the operated limb immediately after surgery and cast immobilization is often preferred to sling suspension¹⁸. Bone repair research has attracted increasing attention in the recent past. Ovine experimental bone defect models involving LCP fixation and immediate postoperative weight bearing have seldom been described in literature. Therefore, research in this field of veterinary orthopedics and in bone regeneration in particular is warranted.

This study set out to develop a segmental bone defect model for bone tissue engineering studies in veterinary orthopedics using female sheep. Experimental 3-cm long tibial bone defects were created and stabilized using single LCP fixation and postoperative limb casts. Animals were submitted to clinical and radiographic assessment over a 90-day follow-up period.

Methods

This study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee on Animal Use of the School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science of the Universidade de São Paulo (CEUA/FMVZ - 7100150715), in compliance with the Brazilian National Council for Control of Animal Experimentation (CONCEA) guidelines.

Eighteen (n = 18) empty and orthopedically sound female Suffolk sheep (Ovis aries) weighing 50 to 60 kg and aged 3 to 4 years were used. Orthopedic soundness was clinically and radiographically determined. Animals were submitted to a 60-day adaptation period prior to surgical procedures. During the experimental period, animals were housed in pairs in dedicated small ruminant stalls with high sawdust bedding and allowed free access to water, salt (Guabiphós, Pará de Minas, MG, Brazil) and a maintenance diet consisting of Tifton grass and commercial pelleted feed (Ovicorte, Pará de Minas, MG, Brazil). Animals were identified and vaccinated against clostridiosis (3 mL·head^–1·SC^–1) (Sintoxan Polivalente, Boehringer Ingelheim Saúde Animal, Paulínia, SP, Brazil) and dewormed with 1% ivermectin (200 µg·kg^–1·SC^–1) (Ivomec, Boehringer Ingelheim Saúde Animal, Paulínia, SP, Brazil). Other procedures were as follows: complete blood count, biochemical analysis of liver and kidney function, determination of serum calcium and phosphate levels and FAMACHA scoring.

Surgical procedures were carried out under general anesthesia. Animals were fasted of solid food and water (36 and 24 h, respectively) and submitted to physical examination. A venous catheter was then inserted for premedication with 0.03 mg·kg^–1 of 2% xylazine hydrochloride (Rompun, Bayer Saúde Animal, São Paulo, SP, Brazil). This was followed by induction with 2 mg·kg^–1 of propofol (Propovan, Cristália, Itapira, SP, Brazil) combined with 1 mg·kg^–1 of ketamine hydrochloride (Cetamin, Syntec, Santana de Parnaíba, SP, Brazil) and maintenance with 100% isoflurane (Isoforine, Itapira, SP, Brazil) vaporized in oxygen. Animals showing 20% increase in blood pressure, heart rate and respiratory rates relative to baseline over the course of surgery received 2.5 µg·kg^–1 of fentanyl citrate (Fentanest, Cristália, Itapira, SP, Brazil).

Animals were submitted to a standardized surgical procedure consisting of creation of a 3-cm long bone defect in the right hind limb. Animals were placed in right lateral recumbency and the right leg clipped and scrubbed for aseptic surgery, first with 2% then with 0.5% chlorhexidine digluconate solution (Riohex 2% and Riohex 0.5%; Rioquímica, São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil). The limb was then draped and the tibia accessed via a dorsomedial approach. A 12-cm longitudinal skin incision was made and subcutaneous tissues gently dissected away. A 10-hole, 4.5-mm LCP (Focus, Indaiatuba, SP, Brazil) was contoured for anatomic fit on the medial aspect of the tibia using a bending template (DPS, Solna, Switzerland). The LCP construct is illustrated in Fig. 1. This plate was positioned 2.5 cm above the medial malleolus and anchored to the bone using two push-pull devices to determine the exact mid-shaft landmark (Fig. 2a). Proper plate position was confirmed with intraoperative radiographs (TR90 Min X Ray, Northbrook, EUA; Mark II G Sound Eklin, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The plate was then removed and parallel osteotomies performed 1.5 cm above and below the mid-shaft landmark to create a 3-cm long bone defect. This was done using a saline-cooled oscillating saw (DPS, Solna, Switzerland) in order to prevent overheating and bone necrosis (Fig. 2b). Surrounding soft tissues were also protected with wet sponges to avoid iatrogenic damage. The periosteum was stripped off transected bone ends to expose 1.5 cm of bare bone surface and fragments realigned and plated. The bone defect was then covered with a biological membrane (Fig. 2c).

Figure 1
Locking compression plate fixation of a segmental tibial bone defect.

Figure 2
Intraoperative images of the ostectomy procedure. (a) Gap measurement prior to bone defect creation; (b) Bone transection using an oscillating saw; (c) Segmental bone defect; (d) Final appearance following completion of the osteosynthesis procedure.

The LCP was applied in bridging fashion, with four screws of appropriate length (Focus, Indaiatuba, SP, Brazil) inserted into the proximal and three into the distal (locked and cortical screw respectively) bone fragment (Fig. 2d). Subcutaneous tissues were closed with 2.0 polyglecaprone 25 (Monocryl Ethicon, São Paulo, SP, Brazil) using a modified double-layer Cushing pattern. The skin was apposed with 3.0 mononylon (Mononylon Ethilon Ethicon, São Paulo, SP, Brazil) in a simple continuous fashion. Finally, proper implant position and bone alignment were radiographically reconfirmed and a full limb cast applied (Hygia Cast, Woosam Medical Co, South Korea).

Postoperative pain management consisted of intravenous administration of 3 mg·kg^–1 of tramadol hydrochloride (Tramadon, Cristália, Itapira, SP, Brazil) and 25 mg·kg^–1 of dipyrone (D500, Zoetis, Campinas, SP, Brazil) three times a day for three days. Phenylbutazone (Equipalazone Injetável, Hertape Calier, Juatuba, SP, Brazil) and ranitidine hydrochloride (Teuto, Anápolis, GO, Brazil) were also given intravenously once a day for three days (4 and 2 mg·kg^–1, respectively). Analgesic rescue consisting of intravenous administration of 0.2 mg·kg^–1 of morphine hydrochloride (Dimorf, Cristália, Itapira, SP, Brazil) was used as needed. Antimicrobial therapy consisted of intramuscular administration of 2.2 mg·kg^–1 of ceftiofur hydrochloride (Cef-50, Agener União, Embu-Guaçu, SP, Brazil) once a day for seven days. Serum alkaline phosphatase, calcium and phosphate levels were also measured.

Animals were confined in pairs throughout the experimental period. Physiological parameters (heart and respiratory rate, rectal temperature and ruminal motility), behavior indicators (reduced feed intake and rumination, reluctance to move or postural changes) and signs of lameness were assessed daily by the same large animal specialists in charge of preoperative care.

Full casts (Fig. 3a) were removed within 15 days of surgery for wound healing assessment and skin suture removal. Bivalve casts were then applied and changed on postoperative day 30. On postoperative day 60, bivalve casts were replaced by a plantar splint allowing foot contact with the ground during weight bearing (Fig. 3b). This was kept in place for the remaining 30 days of the experimental period. Radiographs were taken at 4-week intervals (postoperative days 30, 60 and 90).

Figure 3
Postoperative immobilization. (a) Full limb cast; (b) Plantar splint allowing foot contact with the ground during weight bearing.

Animals were euthanized on postoperative day 90 for histological and microtomographic analyses pertaining to other research projects. Euthanasia was achieved by injectable anesthetic overdose consisting of intravenous administration of 0.5 mg·kg^–1 of 2% xylazine hydrochloride (Rompun, Bayer Saúde Animal, São Paulo, SP, Brazil) and 12.5 mg·kg^–1 of sodium thiopental (Thiopentax, Cristália, Itapira, SP, Brazil), followed by intravenous infusion of 19.1% potassium chloride (Halex Istar, Goiânia, GO, Brazil) at sufficient doses to induce cardiorespiratory arrest.

Results

Operative time ranged from 90 to 120 min. Surgical procedures and anesthetic recovery were uneventful. Following assisted recovery in a padded room, animals were taken back to their stalls. Animals tolerated casts well and showed no difficulties in rising from sternal recumbency. Surgical wound healing was uneventful. However, three animals had developed pressure sores at low pastern and hock level by postoperative day 30. These were treated with wound cleansing, topic application of antibiotic ointment and intramuscular administration of 0.1 mg·kg^–1 of meloxicam (Maxicam 2%, Ouro Fino, Cravinhos, SP, Brazil) once a day for three days.

Animals readily adapted to splints applied on postoperative day 60. Radiographic assessments and cast changes were carried out without sedation. Patients were manually restrained by caretakers and veterinarians in right lateral recumbency on a padded surface without expressing aggressive reactions. Follow-up radiographs revealed proper implant position and satisfactory bone healing with no implant failure, screw loosening or bone fracture/misalignment (Fig. 4). All animals recovered well from surgery, with no significant changes in physiological parameters or behavior and no signs of lameness over the course of the 90-day follow-up period.

Figure 4
Postoperative radiographic images. Caudocranial (CC) and mediolateral (ML) views. Postoperative day 30: (a) CC view; (b) ML view. Postoperative day 60: (c) CC view; (d) ML view. Postoperative day 90: (e) CC view; (f) ML view.

Discussion

The 3 cm segmental tibial bone defect model described in this study is widely known for providing appropriate critical-sized bone defects¹⁹. Bone defect length in this study exceeded 2 to 2.5 times the diameter of the operated bone and the periosteum was stripped off transected bone ends to prevent bone healing during the experimental period¹,²⁰. The 90-day follow-up period is also consonant with bone healing time in any given clinical fracture²¹.

Some guidelines must be followed for successful osteosynthesis in bone healing studies. The procedure must be technically feasible and repeatable. It must also replicate clinical conditions and be consistent with gait and biomechanical characteristics of the target species. Lastly, it should be amenable to imaging-based assessment while not compromising the well-being²¹–²³ . In this study, the dorsomedial approach was selected to expose the middle third of the tibial shaft. The medial aspect of the tibia is thought to be a safe zone due to minimal soft tissue coverage and lack of important neurovascular structures. These anatomical features allow appropriate imaging assessment and greater exposure for surgical procedures, such as ostectomy, osteosynthesis and scaffold implantation or any other procedure involving bone defect treatment with biomaterial implants, with lower risk of iatrogenic damage ¹¹,¹⁹.

Successful use of LCPs in animal models and clinical cases requires appropriate surgical planning. Gap size must be consistent with research goals. Implants must be made of appropriate material, both from a quality and a safety standpoint. Plate size, plate-to-bone distance and screw number, size and orientation must also be accounted for²⁴. Most complications associated LCP fixation stem from technical errors such as implant size underestimation and inappropriate locking screw placement¹⁶. Preoperative radiographic assessment was vital for surgical planning in this study. Anatomical LCP contouring ensured long-lasting stable fixation²⁵. Use of plates with combi-holes allowing insertion of cortical screws in this model enhanced angular stability, particularly near the diaphyseal bone defect, ensuring successful outcomes¹⁴,¹⁶.

Previous investigations in sheep have shown that LCP fixation of bone defects followed by full, unrestricted weight-bearing is associated with complications such as fractures and may compromise subject retention¹. Studies reporting high success rates with this technique often involve the use of some sort of suspension device in the postoperative period¹¹,²⁶. These devices were not used in this study. Postoperative management consisted of limb casts for the first 60 days of the experimental period, followed by splints that did not prevent foot contact with the ground during weight bearing for the remaining 30 days. This strategy was thought to faithfully replicate real-life postoperative recovery in large animal orthopedics¹⁸.

Implant failure, infection and severe fractures requiring subject exclusion have been reported in bone tissue engineering studies involving external fixation or internal fixation with intramedullary pins in sheep²,²⁷,²⁸. Field and Ruthenbeck²³ reported no complications following interlocking nail fixation in sheep. However, animals in their study were supported by a sling in the first three weeks after surgery. Dynamic compression plates have been widely used in sheep. Berner et al.⁷ and Cipitria et al.¹² reported successful outcomes with no major complications following application of such plates. In those studies, operated limbs were not immobilized and animals were allowed to fully bear weight. However, complications such as infection, plate exposure and implant failure have been described²⁹,³⁰. Sparks et al.¹⁹ achieved high success rates with the use of DCP in sheep. However, authors of that study recommend plaster cast immobilization and sling suspension in the first four weeks of the postoperative period. Animals treated in this manner are able to deambulate, but not to lie down. Experimental design in this study was not disruptive to animal well-being. Confinement in well bedded stalls of sufficient size to accommodate two animals and postoperative weight bearing (i.e., no use of suspension devices) allowing unrestricted movement, rest and access to feed was thought to encourage normal animal behavior throughout the experimental period. Postoperative follow-up plays a major role in morbidity and mortality rates associated with this bone healing model. Animal studies should be designed in compliance with the 3R principle (replacement, reduction and refinement) to reduce and optimize animal use in scientific investigations¹¹,²². Findings of this study suggest the method proposed promotes appropriate levels of well-being and can be applied to research in humans as well as veterinary orthopedics.

Conclusions

Experimental creation of segmental tibial bone defects followed by locking compression plate fixation and postoperative cast and splint immobilization proved technically feasible in sheep. Combination of internal fixation and appropriate postoperative management increased construct stability and reduced the risk of postoperative complications. This strategy also allowed satisfactory postoperative recovery without sling suspension. The method proposed was thought to faithfully replicate real-life large animal orthopedics scenarios without compromising animal well-being.

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

• Research performed at Large Animal Surgery Department, Veterinary Hospital, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animals Science, Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo (SP), Brazil. Part PhD degree thesis, Postgraduate Program in Veterinary Surgery. Tutor: Prof. Dr. André Luis do Valle De Zoppa.

• Data availability statement

  Data will be available upon request.

• Funding

  Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
  [https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001807]
  Grant No. 2016/21997-1

References

• ¹
  Reichert JC, Epari DR, Wullschleger ME, Saifzadeh S, Steck R, Lienau J, et al. Establishment of a preclinical ovine model for tibial segmental bone defect repair by applying bone tissue engineering strategies. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2010;16(1):93–104. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEB.2009.0455
  » https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEB.2009.0455
• ²
  Christou C, Oliver RA, Pelletier MH, Walsh WR. Ovine model for critical-size tibial segmental defects. Comp Med. 2014;64(5):377–385.
• ³
  McGovern JA, Griffin M, Hutmacher DW. Animal models for bone tissue engineering and modelling disease. Dis Model Mech. 2018;11(4):dmm033084. https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.033084
  » https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.033084
• ⁴
  Martini L, Fini M, Giavaresi G, Giardino R. Sheep model in orthopedic research: a literature review. Comp Med. 2001;51(4):292–299.
• ⁵
  Lee MH, Arcidiacono JA, Bilek AM, Wille JJ, Hamill CA, Wonnacott KM, et al. Considerations for tissue-engineered and regenerative medicine product development prior to clinical trials in the United States. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2010;16(1):41–54. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2009.0449
  » https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2009.0449
• ⁶
  Muschler GF, Raut VP, Patterson TE, Wenke JC, Hollinger JO. The design and use of animal models for translational research in bone tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2010;16(1):123–145. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2009.0658
  » https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2009.0658
• ⁷
  Berner A, Reichert JC, Woodruff MA, Saifzadeh S, Morris AJ, Epari DR, et al. Autologous vs. allogenic mesenchymal progenitor cells for the reconstruction of critical sized segmental tibial bone defects in aged sheep. Acta Biomater. 2013;9(8):7874–7884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.04.035
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.04.035
• ⁸
  Marcondes GM, Nóbrega FS, Corrêa L, Arana-Chavez VE, Plepis AMG, Martins VCA, et al. Investigation of biological interactions of chitosan-collagen-hydroxyapatite composite with bone tissue in sheep. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec. 2016;68(6):1531-1538. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-8824
  » https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-8824
• ⁹
  Paretsis NF, Arana-Chavez VE, Correa L, Plepis AMG, Martins VCA, Cortopassi SRG, De Zoppa ALV. Histological and histomorphometric evaluation of bone regeneration with biomaterial in the tibia of sheep. Pesq Vet Bras. 2017;37(12):1537–1544. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-736x2017001200029
  » https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-736x2017001200029
• ¹⁰
  Lammens J, Maréchal M, Geris L, Van der Aa J, Van Hauwermeiren H, Luyten FP, et al. Warning about the use of critical-size defects for the translational study of bone repair: Analysis of a sheep tibial model. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2017;23(11):694–699. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2017.0147
  » https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2017.0147
• ¹¹
  Hahn JA, Witte TS, Arens D, Pearce A, Pearce S. Double-plating of ovine critical sized defects of the tibia: a low morbidity model enabling continuous in vivo monitoring of bone healing. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:214. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-214
  » https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-214
• ¹²
  Cipitria A, Reichert JC, Epari DR, Saifzadeh S, Berner A, Schell H, et al. Polycaprolactone scaffold and reduced rhBMP-7 dose for the regeneration of critical-sized defects in sheep tibiae. Biomaterials. 2013;34(38):9960–9968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.011
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.011
• ¹³
  Florin M, Arzdorf M, Linke B, Auer JA. Assessment of stiffness and strength of 4 different implants available for equine fracture treatment: A study on a 20° oblique long-bone fracture model using a bone substitute. Vet Surg. 2005;34(3):231–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532.950X.2005.00035.x
  » https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532.950X.2005.00035.x
• ¹⁴
  Levine DG, Richardson DW. Clinical use of the locking compression plate (LCP) in horses: a retrospective study of 31 cases (2004-2006). Equine Vet J. 2007;39(5):401–406. https://doi.org/10.2746/042516407X196555
  » https://doi.org/10.2746/042516407X196555
• ¹⁵
  Richardson DW. Less invasive techniques for equine fracture repair and arthrodesis. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. 2008;24(1):177–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cveq.2007.11.004
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cveq.2007.11.004
• ¹⁶
  Gueorguiev B, Lenz M. Why and how do locking plates fail? Injury. 2018;49 (Suppl 1):s56–s60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(18)30305-X
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(18)30305-X
• ¹⁷
  Niemeyer P, Schönberger TS, Hahn J, Kasten P, Fellenberg J, Suedkamp N, et al. Xenogenic transplantation of human mesenchymal stem cells in a critical size defect of the sheep tibia for bone regeneration. Tissue Eng Part A. 2010;16(1):33–43. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0190
  » https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0190
• ¹⁸
  Bischofberger AS, Fürst A, Auer J, Lischer C. Surgical management of complete diaphyseal third metacarpal and metatarsal bone fractures: Clinical outcome in 10 mature horses and 11 foals. Equine Vet J. 2009;41(5):465–473. https://doi.org/10.2746/042516409X389388
  » https://doi.org/10.2746/042516409X389388
• ¹⁹
  Sparks DS, Saifzadeh S, Savi FM, Dlaska CE, Berner A, Henkel J, et al. A preclinical large-animal model for the assessment of critical-size load-bearing bone defect reconstruction. Nat Protoc. 2020;15:877–924. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-019-0271-2
  » https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-019-0271-2
• ²⁰
  den Boer FC, Wippermann BW, Blokhuis TJ, Patka P, Bakker FC, Haarman HJ. Healing of segmental bone defects with granular porous hydroxyapatite augmented with recombinant human osteogenic protein-1 or autologous bone marrow. J Orthop Res. 2003;21(3):521–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00205-X
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00205-X
• ²¹
  Smith JO, Tayton ER, Khan F, Aarvold A, Cook RB, Goodship A, et al. Large animal in vivo evaluation of a binary blend polymer scaffold for skeletal tissue-engineering strategies; translational issues. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2017;11(4):1065–1076. https://doi.org/10.1002/term.2007
  » https://doi.org/10.1002/term.2007
• ²²
  Auer JA, Goodship A, Arnoczky S, Pearce S, Price J, Claes L, et al. Refining animal models in fracture research: seeking consensus in optimising both animal welfare and scientific validity for appropriate biomedical use. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007;8:72. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-8-72
  » https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-8-72
• ²³
  Field JR, Ruthenbeck GR. Qualitative and quantitative radiological measures of fracture healing. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2018;31(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.3415/VCOT-17-03-0042
  » https://doi.org/10.3415/VCOT-17-03-0042
• ²⁴
  MacLeod AR, Pankaj P. Pre-operative planning for fracture fixation using locking plates: device configuration and other considerations. Injury. 2018;49 Suppl 1:S12–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(18)30296-1
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(18)30296-1
• ²⁵
  Augat P, von Rüden C. Evolution of fracture treatment with bone plates. Injury. 2018;49(Suppl 1):s2–s7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(18)30294-8
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(18)30294-8
• ²⁶
  Pobloth A-M, Checa S, Razi H, Petersen A, Weaver JC, Schmidt-Bleek K, et al. Mechanobiologically optimized 3D titanium-mesh scaffolds enhance bone regeneration in critical segmental defects in sheep. Sci Transl Med. 2018;10(423):eaam8828. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aam8828
  » https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aam8828
• ²⁷
  Krischak GD, Janousek A, Wolf S, Augat P, Kinzl L, Claes LE. Effects of one-plane and two-plane external fixation on sheep osteotomy healing and complications. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2002;17(6):470–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-0033(02)00039-6
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-0033(02)00039-6
• ²⁸
  Rentsch C, Schneiders W, Hess R, Rentsch B, Bernhardt R, Spekl K, et al. Healing properties of surface-coated polycaprolactone-co-lactide scaffolds: A pilot study in sheep. J Biomater Appl. 2014;28(5):654–666. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885328212471409
  » https://doi.org/10.1177/0885328212471409
• ²⁹
  Gao TJ, Lindholm TS, Kommonen B, Ragni P, Paronzini A, Lindholm TC, et al. Enhanced healing of segmental tibial defects in sheep by a composite bone substitute composed of tricalcium phosphate cylinder, bone morphogenetic protein, and type IV collagen. J Biomed Mater Res. 1996;32(4):505–512. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199612)32:4<505::AID-JBM2>3.0.CO;2-V
  » https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199612)32:4<505::AID-JBM2>3.0.CO;2-V
• ³⁰
  Reichert JC, Cipitria A, Epari DR, Saifzadeh S, Krishnakanth P, Berner A, et al. A tissue engineering solution for segmental defect regeneration in load-bearing long bones. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4(141):141ra93. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3003720
  » https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3003720

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  25 June 2021
• Date of issue
  2021

History

• Received
  02 Feb 2021
• Reviewed
  05 Apr 2021
• Accepted
  03 May 2021