Failure Analysis of HP40 Steel Tubes utilized in Steam Reformer Units of Petroleum Refinery Plants

Abstract

This work is focused on the failure analysis of a HP40 steel tube used in steam reformer units, which was operated at about 850 °C for 100000 h. The failure analysis was conducted experimentally and numerically using the Thermo-Calc software. The main results indicated that the failed tube presented slightly different contents of Ni and Cr from the nominal ones, which originated the absence of the interdendritic eutectic microconstituent, composed of austenite and M₇C₃ carbides. This fact was also corroborated by Thermo-Calc results. This absence of eutectic facilitates the crack propagation on the dendritic zones and then the trangranular brittle fracture propagation through the austenite dendritic zones.

Keywords:
As-Cast HP40 steel; tubes; microstructure; failure

1. Introduction

The steam reformer unit is a fundamental equipment in many processes of the petroleum refinery plants. This unit is composed of a wide variety of vertically oriented tubes¹. A mixture of methane and steam usually pass through the oxide catalyst in the steam reformer to obtain a mixture of hydrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide and water. The combination of high temperature, carbon oxide atmosphere and moderate tensile stresses causes that the damage in these components occurs mainly by the presence of creep, microstructural degradation and metal dusting¹. These components operate at temperatures of approximately 850 °C and internal pressures between 1 and 3.5 MPa, and its service life is expected to be about 100,000 h^2-6. This type of components is usually fabricated with heat resistant austenitic stainless steel, like the HP40 steel (25Cr-35Ni steel), which has excellent creep strength, and good resistance to carburization and oxidation^1-6.

The HP40 steel is used in the as-cast condition, and its high content of Cr and Ni promotes a microstructure composed of a net of primary eutectic precipitates (γ + M₇C₃) located in the dendritic boundaries of an fcc γ austenitic phase^3-8. These Cr-rich M₇C₃ carbides are known as primary carbides and they perform an important role on the prevention of sliding of the austenite grain boundaries at high temperatures^8-12 Besides, Nb-rich MC carbides can be formed during the solidification process, which also contributes to improve its mechanical strength. The secondary fine precipitation of Cr-rich carbides, M₂₃C₆ with cubic morphology , restrict the movement of the dislocations, making of this alloy an excellent option to these operating conditions^13-15. The volume fraction of this precipitation has been reported¹⁴ to increase with carbon content of steel. This precipitation also contributes to increase the wear resistance of these alloys^8-15.

An optimum control of the chemical composition of the as-cast alloy is important to reach the required mechanical properties of tubes used in the steam reformer. Thus, a slight deviation in the chemical composition may alter the microstructure promoting a deterioration in its mechanical properties, which could lead to unexpected failures during its service operation.

Recently, Thermo-Calc (TC) software has been applied to analyze^16,17 the stability of phases in both equilibrium and non-equilibrium conditions for multicomponent alloys. Furthermore, TC-PRISMA¹⁶ has permitted to analyze the growth kinetics of different precipitates either, during continuous cooling or isothermal aging. These calculated results are a good alternative to study the microstructural evolution of the multicomponent alloys used for the fabrication of industrial components.

Therefore, the aim of this work is to analyze experimentally and numerically the effect of chemical composition on the microstructure evolution and its corresponding mechanical performance for two different sections, one of them extracted from a failed HP40 steel tube, with slight difference in the chemical composition from the nominal one.

2. Materials and Experimental Details

2.1 Sampling and sectioning

Figure 1 shows a section of the failed GX45NiCrNbTi steel tube with a nominal diameter and thickness of 21.7 cm (5 in) and 0.9144 cm (0.360 in), respectively. This tube operated at about 850 °C for 100000 h. The tube shows a welded reduction in one of the ends. The failure consists of a fracture, with length of 96.52 cm (38 in) and a fish-mouth like aperture of 25.4 cm (10 in), propagated in the longitudinal direction. A secondary circumferential fracture can be observed in the weld joint of the tube reduction, as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1
Perspective view of the section of tube failed.

The tube was sectioned in two segments, as shown in Figure 2. These were designated as follows: A1 the fractured element of about 36 cm length next to edge of the flaw, as shown in Figure 2a, and A2 the element , exposed to the highest temperature, without any presence of crack propagation with a length of approximately 10 cm, as shown in Figure 2b.

Figure 2
Location of as-received (a) A1 and (b) A2 specimens.

2.2 Experimental details

The chemical composition of A1 and A2 specimens is shown in Table 1, and it was determined by atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS). The nominal chemical composition corresponding to the ASTM A297 standard¹⁸ is also shown for comparison reason. That is, it can be noted that the chemical composition of A1 specimen presents lower content of Ni and higher content of Cr in comparison to those of the nominal composition. In contrast, the chemical composition for A2 specimen is in the composition range expected for this type of steel, according to the ASTM standard¹⁸. The microstructural analysis of A1 and A2 specimens was performed to compare the initial microstructural of the longitudinal, transversal and the external surfaces for both A1 and A2 specimens. All specimens were metallographically prepared, and then etched with Kalling reagent (290 ml ethanol, 100 ml HCl and 5g CuCl₂) to be observed with a light microscope. To regenerate the original as-cast microstructure, both A1 and A2 specimens were remelted three times in order to homogenize the chemical composition using a Mini-Arc furnace MAM-1 Edmund Bühler GmbH under an argon atmosphere. All specimens were analyzed with scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped with Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, EDX, to determine the distribution of chemical elements in the A1 and A2 specimens. Some specimens were also examined by X-ray diffraction (XRD) using monochromated Cu Kα radiation. Brinell hardness and Vickers hardness tests were pursued for all specimens using loads of 3000 kg_f and 200 g_f loads, respectively, for 10 s, according to the standard procedure described in the E10 and E92 ASTM standards^19,20.

Table 1
ASTM standard A297 nominal chemical composition of the HP40 steel, compared to those of the A1 and A2 specimens.

Element	ASTM A297	A1	A2
C wt. %	0.35-0.75	0.45	0.45
Mn wt. %	max.1.5	0.8	0.73
Si wt. %	max. 2.0	1.32	1.11
Nb wt. %	1.25	1.24	1.27
Ti wt. %	0.3	0.16	0.13
Cr wt. %	24-28	29.97	27.89
Ni wt. %	33-37	31.37	33.18

2.3 Numerical methodology

Thermo-Calc analysis was pursued using the version 2019a and the TCFe7.tdb data base²¹. The non-equilibrium phases were studied using the Scheil module of this software, which is based on the Guiliver-Scheil equations¹⁷, which are used to study the non-equilibrium solidification process of alloys. The input data were the chemical composition and temperature.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1 Microstructure characterization of the as-received component

The light microscope microstructures for the transversal surface of the as-received A1 and A2 specimens are shown in Figures 3a and b, respectively. Both A1 and A2 specimens present a dendritic structure composed of austenite dendrites and interdendritic regions, which shows the presence of small pores or microvoids. It is interesting to notice that some of them are interconnected in the case of A1 specimen. The crack propagation of A1 specimen takes place along the interdendritic zones. Additionally, similar characteristics were also observed for longitudinal and external surfaces of both specimens. Figures 4a and b show the SEM micrographs corresponding to the A1 specimen in the as-polished condition and after chemical etching, respectively, at two different magnification levels. Figure 4a confirms that that the crack propagation occurred intergranularly through the interdendritic zones. Besides, Figure 4b suggests that the crack propagation proceeds through the matrix and precipitated carbide phases, which will be described in the next paragraph.

Figure 3
Microstructure of the longitudinal surface for the as-received (a) A1 and (b) A2 specimens.

Figure 4
SEM micrographs of the A1 specimen in (a) polished and (b) etched conditions.

SEM micrographs of the longitudinal surface for the as-received A1 and A2 specimens are shown in Figures 5a and b, respectively. In the case of as-received A1 specimens, it can be clearly noted the presence of dark and bright precipitates dispersed in the austenite matrix. The EDX analysis indicated that the bright and the dark ones correspond to Nb-rich MC carbide precipitates and Cr-rich M₂₃C₆ carbide precipitates, respectively. A similar microstructure is present in the as-received A2 specimen; however, the Cr-rich M₇C₃ carbide phase shows a eutectic morphology with the austenite phase.

Figure 5
SEM micrographs of the as-received (a) A1 specimen and (b) A2 specimen.

3.2 Thermo-Calc analysis and microstructures

The Thermo-Calc calculated plot of the amount of all equilibrium phases as a function of temperature is shown in Figures 6a and b for the A1 and A2 specimens, respectively. In the case of A1 specimen, the first solid phase to be formed is the austenite and then the (Nb,Ti)C and M₂₃C₆ carbides are solidified. This diagram also suggests that the precipitation of (Nb,Ti)C and M₂₃C₆ carbides from the austenite matrix may occur by isothermal exposing to temperatures lower than 1250 °C. Even more, the formation of ferrite may take place at temperatures lower than 910 °C. On the other hand, the solidification of austenite preceded to that of (Nb,Ti)C for the A2 specimen. To continue, the following eutectic reaction L → γ + M₇C₃ occurs at about 1280 °C. This plot also indicates that the precipitation of (Nb,Ti)C could take place from the austenite phase at temperatures lower than 1250°C. In addition to, the precipitation of M₂₃C₆ occurs at temperatures lower than about 1205 °C, as a result of dissolution of the M₇C₃ carbide. The α ferrite phase can be also formed at temperatures lower than approximately 730 °C with lower volume fraction than that of the A1 specimen.

Figure 6
Thermo-Calc calculated plot of amount of all equilibrium phases versus temperature for (a) A1 specimen and (b) A2 specimen.

Figures 7a and b show the Thermo-Calc calculated plot of temperature versus mole fraction of solid for non-equilibrium conditions of A1 and A2 specimens, respectively, based on the Scheil-Guiliver equations¹⁷. In the case of both A1 and A2 specimens, it is confirmed that the solidification sequence for non-equilibrium condition is similar to that previously described in Figures 6a and b. That is, there is no eutectic microconstituent, γ + M₇C₃, for the solidification of A1 specimen. The volume fraction of M₂₃C₆ of this specimen is higher than that of the other one. The precipitation of M₂₃C₆ can take place during non-equilibrium solidification of A2 specimen. Besides, it can be noted that the δ ferrite phase is formed during non-equilibrium solidification of both specimens. The volume fraction of this phase is higher for the A1 specimen. A measure of the amount of microsegregation of the as-cast alloy is the separation distance between the equilibrium and non-equilibrium curves of Figure 7. Thus, the A2 specimen has a higher microsegregation, which could cause that the interdendritic liquid reaches the eutectic composition promoting the formation of eutectic microconstituent, γ + M₇C_3, in comparison to the A1 specimen.

Figure 7
Thermo-Calc calculated plot of non-equilibrium temperature versus mole fraction of solid temperature for (a) A1 specimen and (b) A2 specimen.

In order to compare the experimental results with the previously calculated Thermo-Calc results, Figures 8 and 9a and b show the SEM micrograph and its corresponding EDX elemental-mapping for the remelted A1 and A2 specimens, respectively. These micrographs confirm that the remelted A1 specimen presents no eutectic constituent, Fe γ + M7C3. Besides, it can be noted the presence of Cr-rich dark and Nb-rich bright precipitates dispersed in the austenite dendrites. Furthermore, Figure 10a shows the XRD pattern corresponding to the remelted A1 specimen. Three phases are clearly identified to correspond to the X-ray diffraction peaks, and they are the austenite matrix and two types of carbides, M₂₃C₆ and (Nb,Ti)C or MC carbide type. The Cr-rich M₂₃C₆ carbides show a plate morphology, while the morphology of (Nb,Ti)C is irregular. In contrast, the SEM micrograph of the remelted A2 specimen indicates the presence of austenite dendrites and interdendritic MC carbide, as shown in Figure 9b. Besides, the eutectic microconstituent, γ + M₇C_3, is clearly observed and composed of the austenite and M₇C₃ phases. These phases are clearly detected in the XRD pattern of the remelted A1 specimen, as shown in Figure 10b. The EDX analysis of M₇C₃ carbides also indicated a Cr-rich carbide for this specimen. Both the calculated and experimental results of the present work are in good agreement with the phase reported for this type of steels in the literature^7-15,22-25.

Figure 8
(a) SEM image and the corresponding EDX-SEM elemental mapping images of (b) Cr, (c) Mn, (d) Nb and (e) Ni for the remelted A1specimen.

Figure 9
(a) SEM image and the corresponding EDX-SEM elemental mapping images of (b) Cr, (c) Mn, (d) Nb and (e) Ni for the remelted A2 specimen.

Figure 10
XRD patterns of the the remelted (a) A1 specimen and (b) A2 specimen.

3.3 Hardness of specimens

Table 2 shows the Brinell hardness number BHN for the as-received A1 and A2 specimens. It can be noted that the average hardness of as-received A1 specimen is slightly higher than that of the as-received A2 specimen. This difference seems to be attributable to the higher volume fraction of M₂₃C₆ for the former specimen, as-shown in Figure 4a. Another reason for this higher hardness could be the highest volume fraction of δ ferrite for the as-received A1 specimen, which was detected experimentally by the magnetic behavior of this specimen. Nevertheless, the bcc structure of ferrite has a lower toughness than that corresponding to the fcc structure of austenite, which may be also responsible for the deterioration in tube performance. Table 2 also shows the Vickers microhardness corresponding to the matrix phase and it can be noted that the A1 specimen has higher hardness, in good agreement with the previously shown results. The hardness corresponding to the carbides was higher, 325-550 VHN, but the data scatter was high because the microhardness determination could also include a contribution from the austenite matrix. The hardness values are consistent with those reported in the literature²⁵.

Table 2
BHN of the as-received A1 and A2 specimens.

Specimen	Minimum BHN	Maximun BHN	Average BHN	Microhardness VHN
A1	204.0	250.0	227.0	197
A2	202.0	207.0	204.5	175

3.4 Failure mechanism

Table 3 summarizes the main results of previous sections in order to explain the failure mechanism. These results indicate that the higher Cr and lower Ni content of this tube section for as-received A1 specimen in comparison to the nominal ones, as shown in Table1, promotes the no formation of the eutectic constituent composed of the austenite and M₇C₃ carbide decreasing its opposition to the dislocation movement and thus, the interdendritic zones were favorable to the crack propagation. Then, as a result of the creep condition the microvoids are formed and they become interconnected, which favors the crack propagation in the interdendritic regions, the austenite dendritic zones presented the transgranular brittle fracture mode. This fact is consistent with the SEM fractographs of the as-received A1 specimen, as shown in Figures 11a and b. This shows clearly the crack propagation in the interdendritic zones, as well as the transgranular brittle fracture in the austenite. Additionally, the EDX spectrum of the yellow squared area in Figure 11b indicates that the detected chemical elements correspond mainly to the steel. The presence of oxygen is attributed to the oxide formation. Figures 12ah show the EDX elemental mapping close to a crack for the A1 specimen. The formation of chromium and manganese oxides can be clearly observed in the crack, while there is a depletion of the other elements in the crack. Besides, there is no preferential distribution of elements in the steel. No detection of sulfur or chlorine was found in the crack.

Table 3
Summary of failure characteristics.

Specimen	A1	A2
Cr and Ni wt. %	29.95 and31.37	27.89 and 33.18
Phases	γ + (NbTi)C + M23C6	γ + (NbTi)C + M7C3
Microconstituent	γ matrix with precipitates	Eutectic of γ +M7C3 and proeutectic γ
Crack propagation	Interdendritic	None
Fracture type	Transgranular brittle	None
Interconected micovoids	yes	No

Figure 11
SEM fractographs of the as-received A1 specimen (a) low magnification an (b) high magnification with EDX spectrum.

Figure 12
(a) SEM image and the corresponding EDX-SEM elemental mapping images of a crack for the A1specimen (b) Cr, (c) O, (d) Si, (e) C (f) Fe, (g) Ni and (h) Mn.

It is important to mention that the micropores, observed in micrographs of Figure 3, may be originated by the void formation during the creep of these tubes at high temperatures and they could be responsible of the crack nucleation²⁶.

The presence of ferrite in the A1 specimen may have also contributed to the failure mechanism because of its lower toughness in comparison to that of the austenite. This was not clearly located in the A1 specimen.

In general, it can be stated that the failure mechanism can be attributed to the different chemical composition of the failed zone, related to the nominal one, which may be originated during the casting process of steel tubes.

4. Conclusions

A failure analysis of a HP40 steel tube, used in steam reformer units, was conducted experimentally and numerically with Thermo-Calc and the conclusions are:

1. i

   The local difference in Cr and Ni contents of the tube promoted the absence of the interdendritic eutectic microconstituent, which facilitated the crack propagation.

2. ii

   This difference also caused the increase in δ ferrite, which seems to harden this tube region.

3. iii

   The crack propagation started in the interdendritic zones and propagates transgranularly in the austenitic region.

5. Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support from SIP-IPN and Conacyt.

6. References

• ¹
  Davis JR. ASM specialty handbook: heat-resistant materials. Materials Park: ASM International; 1997.
• ²
  Buchanan KG. Crystallography and morphology of MC carbides in niobium- titanium modified as-cast HP alloys. Metall Mater Trans, A Phys Metall Mater Sci. 2014;45:3373-85.
• ³
  Soares GDA, Almeida LH, Silveira TL, May IL. Niobium additions in HP heat-resistant cast stainless steels. Mater Charact. 1992;29:387-96.
• ⁴
  Ribeiro EAAG, Papaleo R, Guimaraes JRC. Microstructure and Ccreep behavior of a niobium alloyed cast heat-resistant 26 pct Cr Steel. Met Trans A. 1986;17(4):691-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02643989
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02643989
• ⁵
  Thomas CW, Stevens KJ, Ryan MJ. Microstructure and properties of alloy HP50–Nb: comparison of as Cast and service exposed materials. Mater Sci Technol. 1996;12(6):469-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/mst.1996.12.6.469
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/mst.1996.12.6.469
• ⁶
  Alvino A, Ramires D, Tonti A, Lega D. Influence of chemical composition on microstructure and phase evolution of two HP heat resistant stainless steels after long term plant-service aging. Mater High Temp. 2014;31(1):2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/0960340913Z.0000000001
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/0960340913Z.0000000001
• ⁷
  Buchanan KG, Kral MV. Crystallography and Morphology of niobium carbide in as-cast HP-niobium reformer tubes. Metall Mater Trans, A Phys Metall Mater Sci. 2012;43(6):1760-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11661-011-1025-0
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11661-011-1025-0
• ⁸
  Wiengmoon A, Chairuangsri T, Brown A, Brydson R, Edmonds DV, Pearce JTH. Microstructural and crystallographical study of carbides in 30% Cr cast irons. Acta Mater. 2005;53(15):4143-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2005.05.019
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2005.05.019
• ⁹
  Xu Z, Ding Z, Dong L, Liang B. Characterization of M23C6 carbides precipitating at grain boundaries in 100Mn13 steel. Metall Mater A. 2016;47(10):4862-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11661-016-3656-7
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11661-016-3656-7
• ¹⁰
  Voicu R, Andrieu E, Poquillon D, Furtado J, Lacaze J. Microstructure evolution of HP40-Nb alloys during aging under air at 1000°C. Mater Charact. 2009;60(9):1020-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2009.04.007
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2009.04.007
• ¹¹
  Mallick P, Tewary NK, Ghosh SK, Chattopadhyay PP. Effect of TMCP on microstructure and mechanical properties of 304 stainless Steel. Steel Res Int. 2018;89(8):1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/srin.201800103
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/srin.201800103
• ¹²
  Saucedo-Muñoz ML, Ortiz-Mariscal A, Lopez-Hirata VM, Villegas-Cardenas JD, Soriano-Vargas O, Avila-Davila EO. Precipitation analysis of as-cast HK40 steel after isothermal aging. Int J Miner Metall Mater. 2017;24(10):1125-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12613-017-1503-5
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12613-017-1503-5
• ¹³
  Padhila AF, Rios PR. Decomposition of austenite in austenitic stainless steels. ISIJ Int. 2002;42(4):325-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.42.325
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.42.325
• ¹⁴
  Tancret F, Laigo J, Christien F, Le Gall R, Furtado J. Phase transformations in Fe–Ni–Cr heat-resistant alloys for reformer tube applications. Mater Sci Technol. 2018;34(11):1333-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02670836.2018.1449177
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02670836.2018.1449177
• ¹⁵
  Zhang Y, Yang J. Effect of N/C ratio on precipitation behavior of (Cr,Fe)₂₃C₆ carbide in novel cast austenitic heat-resistant steels during directional solidification. Metals. 2018;8(9):678. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/met8090678
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/met8090678
• ¹⁶
  Cueto-Rodriguez MM, Avila-Davila EO, Lopez-Hirata VM, Saucedo-Muñoz ML, Palacios-Pineda LM, Trapaga-Martinez LG, et al. Numerical and experimental analyses of the effect of heat treatments on the phase stability of inconel 792. Adv Mater Sci Eng. 2018;2018:1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4535732
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4535732
• ¹⁷
  Andersson JO, Helander T, Höglund L, Shi PF, Sundman B. Thermo-Calc & DICTRA, computational tools for materials science. Calphad. 2002;26(2):273-312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0364-5916(02)00037-8
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0364-5916(02)00037-8
• ¹⁸
  American Society for Testing and Materials – ASTM. ASTM A297: standard specification for steel castings, iron-chromium and iron chromium-nickel, heat resistant, for general application. West Conshohocken: ASTM; 2004.
• ¹⁹
  American Society for Testing and Materials – ASTM. ASTM E18: standard test method for Brinell hardness of metallic materials. West Conshohocken: ASTM; 2004.
• ²⁰
  American Society for Testing and Materials – ASTM. ASTM E384: standard test method for microindentation hardness of materials. West Conshohocken: ASTM; 2004.
• ²¹
  Thermo-Calc Software. Thermo-Calc software [tcfe7.tdb data] version 2019a. Sweden; 2016.
• ²²
  Nishino K, Kagawa N. Structural diagram of austenitic 25%Cr-20%Ni-Fe-C type alloys. Tetsu To Hagane. 1972;58(1):107-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.2355/tetsutohagane1955.58.1_107 [in Japanese]
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.2355/tetsutohagane1955.58.1_107
• ²³
  Wu XQ, Jing HM, Zheng YG, Yao ZM, Ke W, Hu ZQ. The eutectic carbides and creep rupture strength of 25Cr20Ni heat-resistant steel tubes centrifugally cast with different solidification conditions. Mater Sci Eng A. 2000;293(1-2):252-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(00)00984-9
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(00)00984-9
• ²⁴
  Griffiths WD, McCartney DG. The effect of electromagnetic stirring during solidification on the structure of Al-Si alloys. Mater Sci Eng A. 1996;216(1-2):47-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0921-5093(96)10392-0
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0921-5093(96)10392-0
• ²⁵
  Kishore K, Mukhopadhyay G. Failure analysis of liner plates of wet coke quenching car. J Fail. Anal. and Preven. 2019;19(3):771-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11668-019-00657-3
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11668-019-00657-3
• ²⁶
  Roy N, Raj A, Roy BN, Ray AK. Creep deformation and damage evaluation of service exposed reformer tube. Can Metall Q. 2015;54(2):205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/1879139514Y.0000000175
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/1879139514Y.0000000175

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  29 June 2020
• Date of issue
  2020

History

• Received
  30 Dec 2019
• Reviewed
  04 Apr 2020
• Accepted
  12 May 2020