Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

INNOVATION SYSTEM IN AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT* * An Extended Abstract of this initial study was presented at 20 th ATRS Conference, held by Air Transport Research Society in Rhodes, Greece, June 23 - 26, 2016.

Abstract

Identifying previous research subjects on innovation management in air transport provides not only updated references on new technologies in this industry, but also indicates which areas need to be prioritized in future research. A systematic literature review of publications in this field over the past decade, from 2005 to 2015, including 2016 publications in progress, was carried out, adopting as a control document the proceedings from the 19th ATRS World Conference, held in Singapore in 2015. The searches were done on ScienceDirect and included reports from over 2,500 journals. The abstracts, titles, and keywords were considered, and Boolean connectors were used. The term “innovation” was combined with at least one of eight different strings: air* (e.g., airport, airline, and aircraft), flight, transport, aviation, carrier, lcc, fsc and seat, which were identified as the terms with the highest frequency of incidence in the 129 files in the control document. From the 731 articles identified and analyzed, 92 were considered as directly related to innovation management in air transport. The results showed that the areas with a higher incidence of studies were the aircraft industry (energy efficiency, industrial process, and noise and pollutant emission reduction), airlines (business model, IT and planning and management), policies (sustainable transport, incentive mechanisms and societal aspirations), and airport (services, security, self-financing and air traffic control and projects). From this review, it was determined that, in addition to the limited studies on this subject, there is also a lack of research on innovations in airport structure, such as runway pavements and the optimization of airport sites, as well as on new forms of disposal of wastes generated during the flight, crew training and integrated innovation planning in the sector. These can direct future studies on the subject in the four application areas identified and promote the development of an integrated innovation system in air transport management.

Keywords
Air Transport; Bibliographic Literature Review; Innovation Management

Introduction

When it comes to air transport competitiveness, there is no denying their association with the management of innovation, for both manufacturing and service companies must constantly seek innovation of its products, services and processes (Utterback, 1996Utterback, James M., 1996. Mastering the dynamics of innovation. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.). In this sense, based on a systematic literature review, this study aims to identify what the recent literature considers as innovation in the air transport sector.

Research procedure

To identify previous topics in the literature on innovation in air transport, a systematic review of reports published in the last 10 years (from 2005 to 2015, including 2016 publications in progress) was carried out. The search used as a control document the proceedings from the 19th ATRS World Conference, held in Singapore in 2015, which includes 129 papers. The main strings were collected based on the frequency of incidence of the search terms, as shown in Fig. 1.

Figure 1:
Strings identified in the ATRS 2015 Conference proceedings.

After the identification of the main terms related to air transport in the ATRS 2015 Conference proceedings, the search was carried out on the ScienceDirect database, which includes reports from over 2,500 journals. The abstracts, titles, and keywords were considered, and Boolean connectors were used. The term “innovation” was combined with at least one of eight different strings: air* (e.g., airport, airline, and aircraft), flight, transport, aviation, carrier, lcc, fsc and seat, which were identified as the terms with the highest frequency of incidence in the control document.

The ScienceDirect database includes journals from different fields of study: agricultural and biological sciences, arts and humanities, biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology, business, management and accounting, chemical engineering, chemistry, computer science, decision sciences, design, earth and planetary sciences, economics, econometrics and finance, energy, engineering, environmental science, immunology and microbiology, linguistics, materials science, mathematics, medicine and dentistry, neuroscience, nursing and health professions, pharmacology, toxicology and pharmaceutical science, philosophy, physics and astronomy, psychology, social sciences, sports and recreation, and veterinary science and veterinary medicine.

Of the 731 articles identified and analyzed, 639 were discarded as they deal directly from the air transport issue, because a lot of them treated on air conditioning, other modes of transport, etc. The remaining 92 articles, which were directly related to innovation management in air transport, were thoroughly analyzed with an interpretive approach and described in this study. For this purpose, the method of content analysis was applied (Krippendord, 2004Krippendord, K., 2004. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Sage Publications, Inc.).

Results

The results showed that the areas with a higher incidence of studies on innovation in air transport were the aircraft industry (energy efficiency, industrial process, and noise and pollutant emission reduction), airlines (business model, IT, and planning and management), policies (sustainable transport, incentive mechanisms, and societal aspirations), and airports (security, self-financing, and air traffic control and projects). These were identified as the four application areas of study in air transport innovation. Table 1 presents these four areas according to their frequency of occurrence in the analyzed articles.

Table 1:
Application areas of study.

As shown in Table 1, the area with the highest prevalence of studies is the aircraft industry, which accounts for about 40% of the articles; the area with the least occurrence of studies is airports, with nearly 10% of the articles. This indicates that airports receive the least attention when it comes to air transport innovation. Table 2 presents a summary of the authors, journals, application areas, and focuses of innovation.

Table 2:
Authors, journals, application areas and focuses of innovation

Note in Table 2 that each of the areas has the prevalence studies in particular subject. In the aircraft industry, the focus is on developing materials for building lighter and resistant structures, leading to reduced fuel consumption. In airlines, studies are directed toward the development of new business models to ensure the longevity of companies. Researches on airports look into the provision of quality services to passengers. Finally, in the area of policies, several studies focus on identifying instruments that could decrease emissions and increase energy efficiency in the sector.

Some specific studies presented in Table 2 draw attention to particular innovative practices. Chen (2009Chen, Z., 2009. A brief history of China’s Y-10: Imitation versus innovation. Technology in Society 31, 414-418. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2009.10.002
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2009.1...
) compared aircraft imitation and innovation practices between the YUN-10 (Y-10), a large airplane developed in China, and the Boeing 707-020. Addressing a current concern, Chèze, Gastineau and Chevallier (2011Chèze, B., Gastineau, P., Chevallier, J., 2011. Air traffic energy efficiency differs from place to place: New results from a macro-level approach. International Economics 126-127, 151-177. doi:10.1016/S2110-7017(13)60041-4
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2110-7017(13)60...
) presented some of the most energy-efficient aircraft in terms of jet fuel consumption, ASK and RPK, as well as the geographic areas with high energy efficiency.

Innovation system in air transport management

The review of previous studies, which considered the number of studies on each area out of the 92 studies identified, resulted in the identification of four main application areas for a proposed innovation system in air transport management, as shown in Fig. 2.

Figure 2:
Innovation system in air transport management.

Figure 2 presents the innovation policies, in particular for the aircraft industry, airlines, and airports. The data indicate that there is a gap in innovation in this sector, specifically in the development of new products. For example, the aircraft industry should consider not only the demands of airlines or consumers but also the airport limitations, and vice versa. Note that some large aircraft, such as the A380 or the Boeing 747, cannot operate in most regional airports in the world. Given these considerations, it is necessary to take into account the best practices in other application areas in developing new products, services or processes.

Final considerations

This study identified the main application areas of studies on innovation in air transport. Further, this research found that, in addition to the limited studies on this topic, there is also a lack of studies on innovations in airport structure, such as runway pavements and the optimization of airport sites, as well as on new forms of disposal of wastes generated during the flight, crew training and integrated innovation planning in the sector. These findings can direct future studies on the subject and promote the development of an integrated framework for a management system in air transport innovation.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) and The State of Goiás Research Foundation (FAPEG).

References

  • Adriaensen, M., Giannopapa, C., Sagath, D., Papastefanou, A., 2015. Priorities in national space strategies and governance of the member states of the European Space Agency. Acta Astronautica 117, 356-367. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2015.07.033
    » https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2015.07.033
  • Ahn, Y.H., Min, H., 2014. Evaluating the multi-period operating efficiency of international airports using data envelopment analysis and the Malmquist productivity index. Journal of Air Transport Management 39, 12-22. doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2014.03.005
    » https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2014.03.005
  • Akamavi, R.K., Mohamed, E., Pellmann, K., Xu, Y., 2015. Key determinants of passenger loyalty in the low-cost airline business. Tourism Management 46, 528-545. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2014.07.010
    » https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2014.07.010
  • Akartunal, K., Boland, N., Evans, I., Wallace, M., Waterer, H., 2013a. Airline planning benchmark problems-Part II: Passenger groups, utility and demand allocation. Computers and Operations Research 40, 793-804. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2012.03.005
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2012.03.005
  • Akartunal, K., Boland, N., Evans, I., Wallace, M., Waterer, H., 2013b. Airline planning benchmark problems-Part I:: Characterising networks and demand using limited data. Computers and Operations Research 40, 775-792. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2012.02.012
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2012.02.012
  • Andrew, D., 2012. Institutional policy innovation in aviation. Journal of Air Transport Management 21, 36-39. doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2011.12.015
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2011.12.015
  • Arif, M., Gupta, A., Williams, A., 2013. Customer service in the aviation industry - An exploratory analysis of UAE airports. Journal of Air Transport Management 32, 1-7. doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2013.05.001
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2013.05.001
  • Arvidsson, M., Johansson, C.R., Ek, Å., Akselsson, R., 2006. Organizational climate in air traffic control: Innovative preparedness for implementation of new technology and organizational development in a rule governed organization. Applied Ergonomics 37, 119-129. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2005.06.005
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2005.06.005
  • Benda, P., 2015. Commentary: Harnessing advanced technology and process innovations to enhance aviation security. Special Issue on Aviation Security 48, 23-25. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2015.06.008
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2015.06.008
  • Boussadia, K., 2009. The evolution of airport screening technology. Biometric Technology Today 2009, 7-8. doi:10.1016/S0969-4765(09)70056-6
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-4765(09)70056-6
  • Boy, G.A., 2014. From automation to tangible interactive objects. Annual Reviews in Control 38, 1-11. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2014.03.001
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2014.03.001
  • Braga, D.F.O., Tavares, S.M.O., Da Silva, L.F.M., Moreira, P.M.G.P., De Castro, P.M.S.T., 2014. Advanced design for lightweight structures: Review and prospects. Progress in Aerospace Sciences69, 29-39. doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2014.03.003
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2014.03.003
  • Brown, T.J., 2009. Corporate innovation at Southwest Airlines: An interview with Herb Kelleher, Founder & Former Chair & CEO. Business Horizons 52, 409-412. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.04.004
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.04.004
  • Brueckner, J.K., Pai, V., 2009. Technological innovation in the airline industry: The impact of regional jets. International Journal of Industrial Organization 27, 110-120. doi:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2008.05.003
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2008.05.003
  • Budd, L., Vorley, T., 2013. Airlines, apps, and business travel: A critical examination. Research in Transportation Business and Management 9, 41-49. doi:10.1016/j.rtbm.2013.08.004
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2013.08.004
  • Bygstad, B., 2010. Generative mechanisms for innovation in information infrastructures. Information and Organization 20, 156-168. doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2010.07.001
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2010.07.001
  • Carlsson-Wall, M., Kraus, K., 2015. Opening the black box of the role of accounting practices in the fuzzy front-end of product innovation. Industrial Marketing Management 45, 184-194. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.01.007
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.01.007
  • Catelani, M., Ciani, L., Venzi, M., Barile, G., 2016. Custom TFT-LCD for avionics applications: Environmental tests and optical measurements. Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation 80, 179-189. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2015.11.021
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.11.021
  • Chapman, L., 2007. Transport and climate change: a review. Journal of Transport Geography 15, 354-367. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.11.008
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.11.008
  • Chen, J.K., Chen, I.S., 2010. Aviatic innovation system construction using a hybrid fuzzy MCDM model. Expert Systems with Applications 37, 8387-8394. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.05.043
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.05.043
  • Chen, J.K.C., Batchuluun, A., Batnasan, J., 2015. Services innovation impact to customer satisfaction and customer value enhancement in airport. Technology in Society 43, 219-230. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2015.05.010
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2015.05.010
  • Chen, Z., 2009. A brief history of China’s Y-10: Imitation versus innovation. Technology in Society 31, 414-418. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2009.10.002
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2009.10.002
  • Chèze, B., Gastineau, P., Chevallier, J., 2011. Air traffic energy efficiency differs from place to place: New results from a macro-level approach. International Economics 126-127, 151-177. doi:10.1016/S2110-7017(13)60041-4
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/S2110-7017(13)60041-4
  • Chiaramonti, D., Prussi, M., Buffi, M., Tacconi, D., 2014. Sustainable bio kerosene: Process routes and industrial demonstration activities in aviation biofuels. Applied Energy 136, 767-774. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.08.065
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.08.065
  • Coccia, M., 2005. Measuring intensity of technological change: The seismic approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 72, 117-144. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2004.01.004
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2004.01.004
  • Cohen, M.J., 2010. Destination unknown: Pursuing sustainable mobility in the face of rival societal aspirations. Research Policy 39, 459-470. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.018
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.018
  • Comes, M., 2015. Future Challenges for Civil Aircraft Systems: How to Combine Safety, Simplicity, Virtuality and Agility? IFAC-PapersOnLine 48, 639. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.09.598
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.09.598
  • Connell, P.O., Wirthlin, J.R., Col, L., Malas, J., 2013. Application of Systems Engineering to USAF Small Business Innovative Research ( SBIR ). Procedia Computer Science 16, 621-630. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2013.01.065
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.01.065
  • Cui, C., Hu, B., Zhao, L., Liu, S., 2011. Titanium alloy production technology, market prospects and industry development. Materials & Design 32, 1684-1691. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2010.09.011
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2010.09.011
  • Doll, C., Karagyozov, K., 2010. Violation or strengthening of the self-financing doctrine at international airports by SMCP funded PPP schemes? Research in Transportation Economics 30, 74-86. doi:10.1016/j.retrec.2010.10.009
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2010.10.009
  • Dranev, Y., Chulok, A., 2015. Assessing interactions of technologies and markets for technology road mapping. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 101, 320-327. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.09.024
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.09.024
  • Eceral, T.Ö., Köroğlu, B.A., 2015. Incentive Mechanisms in Industrial Development: An Evaluation through Defense and Aviation Industry of Ankara. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 195, 1563-1572. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.192
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.192
  • Ediger, V.Ş., Çamdali, Ü., 2007. Energy and exergy efficiencies in Turkish transportation sector, 1988-2004. Energy Policy 35, 1238-1244. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.03.021
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.03.021
  • Evans, A., Schäfer, A., 2013. The rebound effect in the aviation sector. Energy Economics 36, 158-165. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2012.12.005
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.12.005
  • Fageda, X., Flores-Fillol, R., 2012a. Air services on thin routes: Regional versus low-cost airlines. Regional Science and Urban Economics 42, 702-714. doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2012.03.005
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2012.03.005
  • Fageda, X., Flores-Fillol, R., 2012b. On the optimal distribution of traffic of network airlines. European Economic Review 56, 1164-1179. doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.05.001
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.05.001
  • Fox, S., 2014. Safety and security: The influence of 9/11 to the EU framework for air carriers and aircraft operators. Research in Transportation Economics 45, 24-33. doi:10.1016/j.retrec.2014.07.004
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2014.07.004
  • Franke, M., 2007. Innovation: The winning formula to regain profitability in aviation? Journal of Air Transport Management 13, 23-30. doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2006.11.003
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2006.11.003
  • Geels, F.W., 2006. Co-evolutionary and multi-level dynamics in transitions: The transformation of aviation systems and the shift from propeller to turbojet (1930-1970).Technovation 26, 999-1016. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2005.08.010
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.08.010
  • Gemici, E., Alpkan, L., 2015. An Application of Disruptive Innovation Theory to Create a Competitive Strategy in Turkish Air Transportation Industry. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 207, 797-806. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.169
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.169
  • Gil, N., Miozzo, M., Massini, S., 2012. The innovation potential of new infrastructure development: An empirical study of Heathrow airport’s T5 project. Research Policy 41, 452-466. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.011
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.011
  • Graham, W.R., Hall, C.A., Vera Morales, M., 2014. The potential of future aircraft technology for noise and pollutant emissions reduction. Transport Policy 34, 36-51. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.02.017
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.02.017
  • Grant, K., Alefantos, T., Meyer, M., Edgar, D., 2013. Capturing and measuring technology based service innovation-A case analysis within theory and practice. International Journal of Information Management 33, 899-905. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.07.002
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.07.002
  • Guirong, X., Xuesong, G., Yuliang, Q., Yan, G., 2015. Analysis and Innovation for Penetrant Testing for Airplane Parts. Procedia Engineering 99, 1438-1442. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.681
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.681
  • Hajiyev, C., 2014. Generalized Rayleigh quotient based innovation covariance testing applied to sensor/actuator fault detection. Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation 47, 804-812. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2013.10.010
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2013.10.010
  • Hajiyev, C., 2012. Tracy-Widom distribution based fault detection approach: Application to aircraft sensor/actuator fault detection. ISA Transactions 51, 189-197. doi:10.1016/j.isatra.2011.07.008
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2011.07.008
  • Hall, A., Mayer, T., Wuggetzer, I., Childs, P.R.N., 2013. Future aircraft cabins and design thinking: optimisation vs. win-win scenarios. Propulsion and Power Research 2, 85-95. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jppr.2013.04.001
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jppr.2013.04.001
  • Halpern, N., 2010. Marketing innovation: Sources, capabilities and consequences at airports in Europe’s peripheral areas. Journal of Air Transport Management 16, 52-58. doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2009.10.002
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2009.10.002
  • Harper, D.A., 2013. Property rights, entrepreneurship and coordination. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 88, 62-77. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2011.10.018
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.10.018
  • Hazledine, T., 2011. Legacy carriers fight back: Pricing and product differentiation in modern airline marketing. Journal of Air Transport Management 17, 129-134. doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2011.02.011
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2011.02.011
  • Heracleous, L., Wirtz, J., 2012. Strategy and organisation at Singapore Airlines: Achieving sustainable advantage through dual strategy. Energy, Transport, & the Environment: Addressing the Sustainable Mobility Paradigm 9781447127178, 479-493. doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-2717-8_26
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2717-8_26
  • Hostis, A.L., 2009. The shrivelled USA : representing time - space in the context of metropolitanization and the development of high-speed transport. Journal of Transport Geography 17, 433-439. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.04.005
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.04.005
  • Ibsen, A.Z., 2009. The politics of airplane production: The emergence of two technological frames in the competition between Boeing and Airbus. Technology in Society 31, 342-349. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2009.10.006
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2009.10.006
  • Kamoun, B., Afungchui, D., Chauvin, A., 2005. A wind turbine blade profile analysis code based on the singularities method. Renewable Energy 30, 339-352. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2004.05.004
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2004.05.004
  • Kehrt, C., 2006. “Higher, always higher”: technology, the military and aviation medicine during the age of the two world wars. Endeavour 30, 138-143. doi:10.1016/j.endeavour.2006.10.001
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.endeavour.2006.10.001
  • Knowles, R.D., 2006. Transport shaping space: differential collapse in time-space. Journal of Transport Geography 14, 407-425. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.07.001
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.07.001
  • Koh, W.T.H., 2007. Terrorism and its impact on economic growth and technological innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74, 129-138. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2006.01.005
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2006.01.005
  • Koroglu, B.A., Eceral, T.O., 2015. Human Capital and Innovation Capacity of Firms in Defense and Aviation Industry in Ankara. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 195, 1583-1592. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.196
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.196
  • Kownacki, C., 2015. Design of an adaptive Kalman filter to eliminate measurement faults of a laser rangefinder used in the UAV system. Aerospace Science and Technology 41, 81-89. doi:10.1016/j.ast.2014.12.008
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2014.12.008
  • Krippendord, K., 2004. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Kumar, S., Kumar, S., Selvaraj, P., Rao, V.S., 2014. Integrated Logistics System for Indigenous Fighter Aircraft Development Program. Procedia Engineering 97, 2238-2247. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.468
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.468
  • Kurt, İ., Yılmaz, N.K., Karakadılar, İ.S., 2013. Features of Innovative Applications in the Service Industry and Exploration of their Effect on Firm Efficiency. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 99, 572-581. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.527
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.527
  • Lee, J.J., 2010. Can we accelerate the improvement of energy efficiency in aircraft systems ? Energy Conversion and Management 51, 189-196. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2009.09.011
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2009.09.011
  • Lin, F., Baohong, C., Yifei, L., Xionghua, Y., 2015. Research on Multi-Specialty Coordination , Multi-Discipline and Multifunction Integration Oriented Modeling and Simulation Innovation Technology. Procedia Engineering 99, 82-93. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.511
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.511
  • Lin, Y.H., 2015. Innovative brand experience ’ s in fl uence on brand equity and brand satisfaction. Journal of Business Research 68, 2254-2259. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.007
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.007
  • Macauley, M. K., 2005. Advantages and disadvantages of prizes in a portfolio of financial incentives for space activities 21, 121-128. doi:10.1016/j.spacepol.2005.02.004
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spacepol.2005.02.004
  • Macintosh, A., Wallace, L., 2009. International aviation emissions to 2025 : Can emissions be stabilised without restricting demand ? 37, 264-273. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.029
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.029
  • Meng, S., Liang, G., Lin, K., Chen, S., 2010. Journal of Air Transport Management Criteria for services of air cargo logistics providers : How do they relate to client satisfaction ? Journal of Air Transport Management 16, 284-286. doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2010.02.003
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2010.02.003
  • Meric, I., Er, M., Gorun, M., 2015. Managing Diversity in Higher Education : USAFA Case. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 195, 72-81. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.331
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.331
  • Molent, L., Barter, S.A., White, P., Dixon, B., 2009. Damage tolerance demonstration testing for the Australian F / A-18. International Journal of Fatigue 31, 1031-1038. doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.05.009
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.05.009
  • Murakami, H., Matsuse, Y., 2014. Dynamic Analysis of Product Lifecycle and Sea / Air Modal Choice : Evidence of Export from Japan *. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics 30, 431-446. doi:10.1016/j.ajsl.2014.12.010
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2014.12.010
  • Nair, S., Paulose, H., 2014. Emergence of green business models : The case of algae biofuel for aviation. Energy Policy 65, 175-184. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.034
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.034
  • Nicolau, J.L., Santa-María, M.J., 2012a. Gauging innovation worth for airlines. Journal of Air Transport Management 20, 9-11. doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2011.08.005
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2011.08.005
  • Nicolau, J.L., Santa-María, M.J., 2012b. Effect of innovation on airlines’ operating leverage: A Spanish case study. Journal of Air Transport Management 25, 44-46. doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2012.08.001
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2012.08.001
  • Pereira, B.A., Caetano, M., 2015. A conceptual business model framework applied to air transport. Journal of Air Transport Management 44-45, 70-76. doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2015.02.006
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2015.02.006
  • Pornet, C., Isikveren, A.T., 2015. Conceptual design of hybrid-electric transport aircraft. Progress in Aerospace Sciences 79, 114-135. doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2015.09.002
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2015.09.002
  • Preez, N., Perry, N., Candlot, A., Bernard, A., Uysl, W., Louwl, L.. 2015 Customised high-value document generation.
  • Schwabe, O., Shehab, E., Erkoyuncu, J., 2015. Progress in Aerospace Sciences Uncertainty quanti fi cation metrics for whole product life cycle cost estimates in aerospace innovation. Progress in Aerospace Sciences 77, 1-24. doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2015.06.002
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2015.06.002
  • Scranton, P., 2007. Turbulence and Redesign : Dynamic Innovation and the Dilemmas of US Military Jet Propulsion Development 25, 235-248. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2007.04.001
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2007.04.001
  • Silvester, S., Kumar, S., Timmeren, A. Van, Bauer, P., Quist, J., Dijk, S. Van, 2013. Exploring design scenarios for large-scale implementation of electric vehicles ; the Amsterdam Airport Schiphol case. Journal of Cleaner Production 48, 211-219. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.053
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.053
  • Slayton, R., Spinardi, G., 2016. Radical innovation in scaling up: Boeing’s Dreamliner and the challenge of socio-technical transitions. Technovation 47, 47-58. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2015.08.004
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.08.004
  • Smith, R.A., 2008. Enabling technologies for demand management : Transport. Energy Policy 36, 4444-4448. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.072
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.072
  • Sulmona, L.G., Edgington, D.W., Denike, K., 2014. The role of Advanced Border Controls at Canadian airports. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT OF GEOGRRAPHY 39, 11-20. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.06.006
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.06.006
  • Tang, H.K., 2006. Adoption of navigation technologies : Five historical and contemporary cases 73, 845-859. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2005.07.006
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2005.07.006
  • Toral, J., Castanié, B., Barrau, J., Swiergiel, N., 2011a. Composites : Part A Multi-level analysis of low-cost Z-pinned composite joints Part 2 : Joint behaviour. Composites Part A 42, 2082-2092. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.09.017
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.09.017
  • Toral, J., Castanié, B., Barrau, J., Swiergiel, N., 2011b. Composites : Part A Multi-level analysis of low-cost Z-pinned composite joints Part 1 : Single Z-pin behaviour. Composites Part A 42, 2070-2081. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.09.018
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.09.018
  • Ucler, C., Gok, O., 2015. Innovating General Aviation MRO ’ s through IT : The Sky Aircraft Management System - SAMS. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 195, 1503-1513. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.452
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.452
  • Uhlmann, E., Kersting, R., Borsoi, T., 2015. Additive Manufacturing of Titanium Alloy for Aircraft Components. Procedia CIRP 35, 55-60. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2015.08.061
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.08.06
  • Utterback, James M., 1996. Mastering the dynamics of innovation. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
  • Vishnevskiy, K., Karasev, O., Meissner, D., 2015. Integrated roadmaps and corporate foresight as tools of innovation management: The case of Russian companies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 90, 433-443. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2014.04.011
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.04.011
  • Wiesenthal, T., Condeço-melhorado, A., Leduc, G., 2015. Innovation in the European transport sector : A review 42, 86-93. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.05.003
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.05.003
  • Yeh, Y., 2014. Journal of Air Transport Management Exploring the impacts of employee advocacy on job satisfaction and organizational commitment : Case of Taiwanese airlines. Journal of Air Transport Management 36, 94-100. doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2014.01.002
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2014.01.002
  • Yeoman, I., Lennon, J.J., Blake, A., Galt, M., Greenwood, C., Mcmahon-beattie, U., 2007. Oil depletion : What does this mean for Scottish tourism ? 28, 1354-1365. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2006.09.014
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2006.09.014
  • Zhu, D., Zhang, X., Ding, H., 2013. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture Tool wear characteristics in machining of nickel-based superalloys. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 64, 60-77. doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.08.001
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.08.001
  • *
    An Extended Abstract of this initial study was presented at 20 th ATRS Conference, held by Air Transport Research Society in Rhodes, Greece, June 23 - 26, 2016.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    02 Dec 2019
  • Date of issue
    2019

History

  • Received
    08 Jan 2018
  • Accepted
    12 Nov 2019
TECSI Laboratório de Tecnologia e Sistemas de Informação - FEA/USP Av. Prof. Luciano Gualberto, 908 FEA 3, 05508-900 - São Paulo/SP Brasil, Tel.: +55 11 2648 6389, +55 11 2648 6364 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: jistemusp@gmail.com