The Role of Technology in the Neonatal Screening Laboratory

In 1961, Dr Robert Guthrie initiated the collection of blood as dried spots on filter paper for testing newborns for the detection of phenylketonuria (PKU).¹,² He analyzed these dried blood spot (DBS) specimens with a bacterial inhibition test that he developed to measure phenylalanine.² This combination of easily transportable specimens and an inexpensive, simple test made large-scale testing for PKU possible. As a result of Guthrie’s efforts, the successful introduction of DBS as a source for PKU screening eventually led to population-based screening for over 32 disorders for all newborns in the United States from only a few blood drops collected from a heel stick and absorbed into special filter paper.

Today, newborn screening (NBS) is the largest population-based genetic screening effort in the United States and is performed worldwide.³ The detection of treatable, inherited congenital disorders is a major public health responsibility. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has recognized NBS as 1 of the 10 great public health achievements in the United States in the first decade of the 21st century.⁴ Newborn screening programs are designed to detect asymptomatic newborns who are at higher risk for certain diseases from those who may not, using DBS specimens collected 24 to 72 hours after birth. Babies that are screen positive are rapidly followed up with a diagnostic confirmation and appropriate treatment that helps to prevent mental retardation, premature death, and other deleterious clinical outcomes. Improvements in technology and the expansion of the recommended uniform NBS panel of diseases have led to earlier lifesaving treatment and intervention for at least 12 000 additional newborns each year in the United States with selected genetic, hearing, and endocrine disorders.⁵

Newborn screening laboratories have traditionally been influenced by emerging technologies and have adapted many clinical testing platforms for use. Examples include the use of tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) for aminoacidopathies and organic acidurias, multimarker high-performance liquid chromatography testing for hemoglobinopathies, multianalyte immunoassays for HIV, hepatitis B and C antibodies, and also second-tier DNA-based assays that detect mutation panels and even next-generation sequencing technologies for cystic fibrosis and other disorders.

The aim of this special issue is to present NBS laboratory experiences, where advances in technology and automation have enabled more efficient high-throughput laboratory screening, the detection of more congenital disorders, as well as the incorporation of molecular methods to the NBS laboratory workflow. The 6 articles presented in this supplement provide a comprehensive look at how technological advances have facilitated increased population-based screening activities in the United States and worldwide. The authors provide examples of how different technologies are used in the modern NBS laboratory, with particular emphasis on the application of these technologies to improve sensitivity and specificity. Newborn screening laboratories must constantly work to reduce the number of false-positive results—and eliminate false-negative results—in a way that ensures no harm is done during the analytical process. The 6 articles provide unique approaches to accomplish this goal. Journal readers will gain an appreciation of the wide variety of technologies used by NBS laboratorians—a unique high-throughput situation that merits close examination as a potential model for disease detection in other fields.

The role that technology plays in the NBS laboratory is unequivocally intertwined with the expansion of NBS programs worldwide. As such, we must consider how new technologies and their innovative applications can be utilized to further the goals of every NBS program in the world. I express my gratitude and appreciation for the work of all of the authors in this supplement.

Funding

• The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

• ¹
  Guthrie, R . The origin of newborn screening. Screening. 1992;1:5–15.
• ²
  Guthrie, R, Susi, A. A simple phenylalanine method for detecting phenylketonuria in large populations of newborn infants. Pediatrics. 1963;32:338–343.
• ³
  De Jesús, VR, Mei, JV, Bell, CJ, Hannon, WH. Improving and assuring newborn screening laboratory quality worldwide: 30-year experience at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Semin Perinatol. 2010; 34(2):125–133.
• ⁴
  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Ten great public health achievements€”United States, 2001-2010. MMWR. 2011;60(19):619–623.
• ⁵
  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . CDC Grand Rounds: newborn screening and improved outcomes. MMWR. 2012;61(21):390–393.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  30 May 2019
• Date of issue
  2016

History

• Received
  18 Apr 2016
• Accepted
  12 May 2016