Guanidinoacetate Methyltransferase Deficiency: A Review of Guanidinoacetate Neurotoxicity

Abstract

Guanidinoacetate methyltransferase (GAMT) deficiency is an autosomal recessively inherited disorder of the metabolism of creatine that leads to depleted levels of creatine and excessive concentrations of guanidinoacetate (GAA). Patients affected develop neurological symptoms during childhood, such as muscular hypotonia, involuntary extrapyramidal movements, convulsions, slurred speech, and even autism. Although the pathophysiology of GAMT deficiency is unclear, neurological dysfunction is commonly found in this disease, and it has been mainly attributed to a reduction in creatine or/and an increase in GAA levels. Reports from literature suggest that GAA may interfere with neuronal γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors type A and cause epilepsy in human. Preclinical studies show that GAA increases free radical formation and decreases brain antioxidant defenses, inducing alteration in oxidative status. Guanidinoacetate also impairs energy metabolism in brain. The discussion of this review focuses on various and latest studies addressing GAMT deficiency and creatine metabolism, as well as addresses the question of neurotoxicity GAA.

Keywords
guanidinoacetate methyltransferase deficiency; creatine; guanidinoacetate; neurotoxicity

Guanidinoacetate and Creatine Metabolism—An Overview

Guanidinoacetate (GAA) is a metabolite of glycine in which the amino group can be converted into a guanidine. It is highly involved in the metabolism of creatine, being its direct precursor.¹

Creatine has been known for its essential functions in muscle, contributing to a transient intracellular storage of metabolic energy mainly in the form of phosphocreatine that is nothing more than creatine with a phosphate group.¹ Mammals take about half of their creatine from diet (mostly from meat and fish) and synthesize the other half through a relative simple reaction that occurs mainly in the kidney and liver involving a 2-step pathway with 2 enzymes and 1 membrane carrier.² The enzymes involved are l-arginine: glycine amidinotransferase (AGAT) and .-guanidinoacetate methyltransferase (GAMT), whereas the membrane carrier is named SLC6A8. As suggested by the names of the relevant enzymes, this endogenous synthesis of creatine requires 3 amino acids: glycine, arginine, and methionine.³ The first step of creatine biosynthesis is catalyzed by AGAT and occurs mainly in the kidney, more frequently in the mitochondria intermembrane space and in lower levels in the cytoplasm.⁴ It condenses the amino acids arginine and glycine to produce GAA. Guanidinoacetate methyltransferase transfers a methyl group from .-adenosylmethionine to GAA to produce creatine. The majority of creatine that arises from this second step is produced in the liver.⁴ The creatine produced in the liver is secreted in the bloodstream by an unknown mechanism and distributed throughout the body, where it actively enters the cells using specific creatine transporter, SLC6A8, a Na⁺- and Cl⁻-dependent symporter.⁵,⁶ The phosphorylation of creatine is made possible by the creatine kinases (CKs).⁷ This is an efficient way to store energy not only to skeletal muscle but also to organs that require a great amount of energy in order to efficiently develop their activities in human body, like the brain.⁸ The phosphocreatine has a slightly higher diffusion capacity than adenosine triphosphate (ATP), and it can reversibly transfers its .-phosphoryl group to adenosine diphosphate when this nucleotide is at high concentrations, regenerating ATP and preventing the tissue from running out of energy.⁹-¹¹ Approximately two-thirds of creatine are transformed in phosphocreatine by the isoforms of CK,¹² showing the importance of this molecule as a vital intracellular storage of metabolic energy. Creatine and phosphocreatine may undergo a nonenzymatic reaction of dehydration and cyclization to form creatinine that freely diffuses to the bloodstream and leaves the body in the urine. This molecule is frequently used as a marker of the renal function.¹³ Creatine synthesis is regulated physiologically in kidney by downregulation of AGAT and in developing brain cells by retroregulation of AGAT by creatine levels.¹⁴ Creatine transporter (SLC6A8) is regulated by creatine levels in the bloodstream and is inhibited by high levels of GAA.¹ Furthermore, the ingestion of creatine supplement has been shown to decrease the rate of endogenous synthesis.¹⁴

Guanidinoacetate Methyltransferase Deficiency

In 1994, Stockler et al described a new inborn error of metabolism (IEM) that was addressed as the first IEM of creatine. The new disease was named after the affected enzyme: GAMT deficiency.¹⁵ This metabolic disease is an autosomal recessively inherited disorder caused by mutations in the GAMT gene that leads to depleted levels of creatine and excessive concentrations of GAA in skeletal muscle, blood, brain, and other tissues.¹⁶-¹⁸ It is a rare disease with approximately 110 cases reported so far, mostly from Europe and the Middle East.¹⁹ The cerebral tissue relies on a continuous energy supply in order to maintain its functions properly. Therefore, with creatine in low levels, the brain becomes the most affected organ in GAMT-deficient patients. Neurological symptoms are common and variable among individuals affected by GAMT deficiency, including intractable epilepsy, intellectual impairment, autism, automutilating behavior, extrapyramidal syndrome, slurred speech, and hypotonia.¹⁶,¹⁷,²⁰,²¹

Supplementation with creatine has been used as pharmacological treatment in GAMT deficiency for a long time.¹⁷ Nonetheless, one of the major issues surrounding GAMT deficiency and the brain is the difficulty that creatine has to penetrate the blood–brain barrier (BBB) due to the small amount of SLC6A8 transporter present in the microcapillaries, the absence of the same transporter in astrocytes lining them, and the limited diffusion of creatine through extracellular matrix surrounding BBB.²² To provide sufficient levels of creatine in healthy individuals, the brain has its own synthesis expressing AGAT and GAMT locally. In the cortex and other brain regions, AGAT and GAMT are dissociated, and the intermediate GAA has to be transported between AGAT- and GAMT-expressing cells to complete the synthetic pathway.²³ The presence of this endogenous creatine synthesis is supported by studies that demonstrated that despite the inability to capture creatine from periphery, patients with SLC6A8 deficiency still have normal levels of this molecule in their central nervous system (CNS), whereas GAMT-deficient patients presented a dramatic reduction in comparison.²⁴ The phenotypic diversity in patients with GAMT deficiency may be partially explained by a variety of functions that creatine seems to play in the brain. Apart from its functions in energy regeneration, researchers proposed that creatine may act as a neurotransmitter in the CNS modulating GABAergic and/or glutamatergic neurons.²⁵ This theory is supported by studies that show that rat brain synaptosomes express creatine transporter SLC6A8,²⁶ implying the existence of a creatine reuptake mechanism in axon terminal membrane.²⁷

The energetic reservoir provided by the system creatine/CK also helps to prevent overload of the mitochondrial respiratory chain, reducing generation of reactive species that have the power to cause oxidative stress and induce cytochrome C dissociation from the inner mitochondrial membrane, initiating early apoptotic triggering events.²⁸ In fact, several studies claim that creatine can not only prevent the generation of reactive species but also act as a direct scavenger of a range of radicals, including superoxide anion and peroxynitrite.²⁹,³⁰ This effect happens regardless if creatine is in or out a mammalian cell.³¹ A recent study revealed that creatine is able to prevent damage induced in vitro by oxidizing agents in both nucleated and nonnucleated cells, suggesting that creatinine may possess similar properties.³² These antioxidant properties presented by creatine appear to be beneficial not only to GAMT³³ but also to other innate errors of metabolism where creatine was able to prevent lipid peroxidation and imbalance of redox homeostasis.³⁴,³⁵

Neurotoxicity of GAA

Despite the fact that decreased levels of creatine play a key role in the physiopathology of GAMT deficiency, the evidence shows that elevated levels of GAA in the brain are the major responsible for triggering the neurological symptoms of patients affected by this disease, particularly the epileptogenic action.²¹ Under physiological conditions, no transport of GAA occurs at the BBB, but there is a way out via taurine transporters (TauT) in the blood–cerebrospinal fluid barrier.²² Under GAMT deficiency, there is an uptake of GAA from the periphery at BBB, and the exit of GAA from CSF to blood may be increased using both TauT and SLC6A8, that is also capable of transporting GAA.²²,²⁹ The accumulation of GAA also happens via the brain endogenous AGAT activity that is plainly functional. It is suggested that high concentrations of GAA can interfere with neuronal γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors type A, but not with GABA receptor type B, and cause the neurological dysfunction behind the symptoms presented by GAMT-deficient patients.³⁶ The GAA seems to act as a direct agonist of GABA_A receptors with a less efficient GABA mimetic potential than GABA itself. However, at high concentrations, like the ones found in patients with GAMT, GAA is able to cause chronic stimulation in GABA_A, and consequently, receptors undergo desensitization. This effect causes an increase in neuronal excitability due to internalization of GABA_A receptors and a decreased response to GABA.³⁷,³⁸ The basal ganglia output nuclei globus pallidus and substantia nigra pars reticulata are involved in both movement and seizure control through GABAergic projections that appear altered in experiments conducted in vitro.³⁷ Therefore, the motor dysfunctions and particularly seizure activity in patients with GAMT deficiency may be explained by interference of GAA in these interconnections present in the basal ganglia.

Figure 1
Suggested mechanisms of neurochemical effects of GAA accumulation in the brain. Under GAMT deficiency, there is uptake of GAA from the periphery and GAA synthesis in the neuron occurring mainly in the mitochondria intermembrane space via AGAT. The GAA leaves the neuron through an unknown mechanism, and due to the lack of functional GAMT, it accumulates in the synaptic cliff and within the neuron itself. This accumulation leads to a series of imbalances in enzymes, receptors, and redox state. The GAA seems to act as a direct agonist of GABAA receptors, leading to their desensitization and internalization. It appears to cause a decrease in antioxidant defenses at the same time that inhibits the activity of crucial enzymes for energy generation: Na⁺, K⁺-ATPase, complex II in the mitochondrial respiratory chain, and creatine kinase. The GAA significantly increased AChE activity, leading to less AChE available in the synaptic cliff. Furthermore, GAA markedly inhibited glutamate uptake by astrocytes. AChE indicates acetylcholinesterase; AGAT, arginine glycine amidinotransferase; ATP, adenosine triphosphate; GAA, guanidinoacetate; GAMT, guanidinoacetate methyltransferase.

In addition, studies have shown that an intrastriatal injection of GAA in rats leads to a series of biochemical alterations and abnormalities in behavioral tests. First, the intrastriatal injection appeared to cause a decrease in antioxidant defenses at the same time that inhibit the activity of crucial enzymes for the generation of energy in the CNS. These enzymes are Na⁺, K⁺-ATPase, complex II in the mitochondrial respiratory chain, and CK.³⁹,⁴⁰ Nonetheless, the cholinergic system plays a crucial role in cognitive function, including memory, and results showed that GAA significantly increased acetylcholinesterase activity and impaired retention of an inhibitory avoidance task, implying that GAA accumulation affects all steps of memory processing following distinct time-dependent mechanisms.⁴¹ Furthermore, another study showed that GAA markedly inhibited glutamate uptake by striatum, what can be linked to the neurological dysfunction characteristic of GAMT-deficient patients, especially the generalized convulsions.⁴² These series of heterogenic alterations appear to be involved in the pathophysiology of the neurological features present in patients with GAMT deficiency. Suggested mechanisms of neurochemical effects of GAA accumulation in brain are summarized in Figure 1.

Clinical Cases and Possible Treatments to GAMT Deficiency

The diagnosis of GAMT deficiency can be made based on a series of tests that include creatinine excretion in 24-hour urine, Sakaguchi staining reaction of guanidino compounds in urine samples, GAA excretion measured quantitatively, and magnetic resonance spectroscopy to detect accumulation of GAA and depletion of creatine in the brain.⁴³Measurements of GAMT activity are now available for some cell types.⁴⁴ Once the pathology is confirmed, the treatment of GAMT deficiency aims for both repletion of cerebral creatine and reduction of GAA concentrations.

Oral supplementation with creatine (administered as creatine monohydrate) at high doses can restore brain levels and result in improvements to the patients mostly in the involuntary extrapyramidal movements and convulsions.¹⁶,¹⁷ The benefits of this supplementation can be reached only with long-term treatment due to the slow cross of creatine through BBB. The positive effects may take months or even years to appear. The doses used are normally around 400−670 mg per kg per day. This dose appears to be safe, since excess of creatine may cause oxidative stress.³² A presupplementation investigation of kidney function might be considered for reasons of safety but in normal healthy subjects appears unnecessary.⁴⁵ A recent study performed by Peters et al showed that the supplementation with creatine (3 g/d) decreases GAA concentrations in plasma of Bangladeshi adults without GAA deficiency.⁴⁶ However, it is important to highlight that creatine supplementation per se does not fully normalize GAA levels in patients with GAMT deficiency. In order to achieve an even better clinical outcome, studies suggest that lowering the ingestion of one of the precursor substrates of GAA, arginine, as well as high-dose l-ornithine supplementation are necessary.¹⁶,⁴⁷,⁴⁸l-Ornithine acts via competitive inhibition of AGAT. Furthermore, sodium benzoate administration may reduce the production of GAA via conjugation with glycine to form hippuric acid that is quickly excreted.¹⁸ Nonetheless, a recent treatment applied in a 6-year-old GAMT-deficient patient showed no further benefits of using sodium benzoate combined with creatine supplementation and arginine restriction, which questions the relevance of this additional supplementation.⁴⁹

This evidence-based treatment using creatine, ornithine, and sodium benzoate supplements along with dietary protein restriction was able to improve seizures and development in 5 patients with GAMT deficiency.⁵⁰ The average age of diagnosis in this study was 25.8 ± 26.2 months, but one of the subjects was diagnosed earlier, at 8 days from birth. The remarkable fact is that this subject treated at birth remains developmentally normal at 12 months of age, whereas the others still face neurological dysfunctions. This is in agreement with adult and child cases of GAMT deficiency, where diagnosis and treatment later in life correlates with persistency of motor and neurological impairments, despite minor improvements.⁴⁹,⁵¹,⁵²

A larger study collected data on 48 patients with GAMT deficiency worldwide⁴⁸ and showed that the clinical presentation of this innate IEM is indeed highly variable and best treated with supplementation with creatine and l-ornithine and low intake of arginine. The median age at diagnosis in this study was 51 months, and then again those who were diagnosed earlier in life developed normally or showed only borderline developmental outcomes than those who were not. This may be due to the fact that BBB in developmental brain is not as tightly regulated as in adults, and this can facilitate the cross of exogenous creatine into the brain. Furthermore, 3-dimensional organotypic brain cell cultures were heavily affected by increased levels of GAA that caused axonal hypersprouting and an increase in nonapoptotic cell death.¹⁴ This strongly affects brain cell development in an irreversible way and may explain why later diagnosis and treatment fails to normalize completely the symptoms presented by GAMT-deficient patients.

Although early treatment seems to prevent permanent damage from occurring during CNS development, it is important to note that treatment should continue through lifetime, as we can see in the case of one of the patients in the study conducted by Stockler et al. Treatment was started within the first 3 weeks of life. At 32 months, her development was normal, while her late-treated brother (who also have GAMT deficiency) faced more difficulties. However, at 4 years, the treatment was discontinued, and she was affected by episodes of febrile seizures. She recommenced the treatment, and even though her current status is not as good as in the beginning of treatment, it is still better than her late-treated brother. This provides evidence of the importance of searching for new prenatal diagnosis of GAMT, such as measurements in the amniotic fluid and direct sequencing of the GAMT gene in newborns.⁵³,⁵⁴

Conclusion

In conclusion, GAMT deficiency is a rare innate IEM of creatine that results in severe neurological effects. It is a treatable disorder, since supplementation with creatine, depletion of arginine in the diet, and supplementation with ornithine considerably ameliorate the symptoms. The seizures do not respond to conventional epileptic treatment, and there is still controversy about the effectiveness of using sodium benzoate supplementation. Moreover, early diagnosis and start of treatment improve the outcome and may even lead, if begun presymptomatically, to normal development. Ideally, treatment should start before the creatine pool supplied from maternal body during gestation ends. This makes GAMT deficiency an important target to prenatal diagnosis. The treatment must be uninterrupted and always guided by health professionals in order to avoid nutritional deficits and low compliance. Nevertheless, a lot of study is still needed to better understand the mechanism behind all the neurological dysfunctions presented by patients, and finding a better way to remove brain GAA is the main goal of researches in the field.

Funding

• The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

• ¹
  Wyss, M, Kaddurah-Daouk, R. Creatine and creatinine metabolism. Physiol Rev. 2000;80(3):1107–1213.
• ²
  Barcelos, R, Stefanello, S, Mauriz, J, Gonzalez-Gallego, J, Soares, F. Creatine and the liver: metabolism and possible interactions. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2015;16(1):12–18.
• ³
  Brosnan, J, da Silva, R, Brosnan, M. The metabolic burden of creatine synthesis. Amino Acids. 2011;40(5):1325–1331.
• ⁴
  Magri, E, Baldoni, G, Grazi, E. On the biosynthesis of creatine. Intramitochondrial localization of transamidinase from rat kidney. FEBS Lett. 1975;55(1):91–93.
• ⁵
  da Silva, R, Clow, K, Brosnan, J, Brosnan, M. Synthesis of guanidinoacetate and creatine from amino acids by rat pancreas. Br J Nutr. 2013;111(4):571–577.
• ⁶
  Brosnan, J, Brosnan, M. Creatine: endogenous metabolite, dietary, and therapeutic supplement. Annu Rev Nutr. 2007;27(1):241–261.
• ⁷
  Salomons, S, Wyss, M. Creatine and creatine kinase in health and disease. Subcell Biochem. 2007;46:356.
• ⁸
  Schlattner, U, Tokarska-Schlattner, M, Wallimann, T. Mitochondrial creatine kinase in human health and disease. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1762(2):164–180.
• ⁹
  Wallimann, T, Wyss, M, Brdiczka, D, Nicolay, K, Eppenberger, H. Intracellular compartmentation, structure and function of creatine kinase isoenzymes in tissues with high and fluctuating energy demands: the ‘phosphocreatine circuit’ for cellular energy homeostasis. Biochem J. 1992;281(1):21–40.
• ¹⁰
  Saks, V, Kuznetsov, A, Vendelin, M, Guerrero, K, Kay, L, Seppet, E. Functional coupling as a basic mechanism of feedback regulation of cardiac energy metabolism. Mol Cell Biochem. 2004;256(1/2):185–199.
• ¹¹
  Sauer, U, Schlattner, U. Inverse metabolic engineering with phosphagen kinase systems improves the cellular energy state. Metab Eng. 2004;6(3):220–228.
• ¹²
  Wallimann, T, Tokarska-Schlattner, M, Schlattner, U. The creatine kinase system and pleiotropic effects of creatine. Amino Acids. 2011;40(5):1271–1296.
• ¹³
  Wyss, M, Schulze, A. Health implications of creatine: can oral creatine supplementation protect against neurological and atherosclerotic disease? Neuroscience. 2002;112(2):243–260.
• ¹⁴
  Hanna-El-Daher, L, Béard, E, Henry, H, Tenenbaum, L, Braissant, O. Mild guanidinoacetate increase under partial guanidinoacetate methyltransferase deficiency strongly affects brain cell development. Neurobiol Dis. 2015;79:14–27.
• ¹⁵
  Stockler, S, Holzbach, U, Hanefeld, F. Creatine deficiency in the brain: a new, treatable inborn error of metabolism. Pediatr Res. 1994;36(3):409–413.
• ¹⁶
  Gordon, N. Guanidinoacetate methyltransferase deficiency (GAMT). Brain Dev. 2010;32(2):79–81.
• ¹⁷
  Stockler, S, Hanefeld, F, Frahm, J. Creatine replacement therapy in guanidinoacetate methyltransferase deficiency, a novel inborn error of metabolism. Lancet. 1996;348(9030):789–790.
• ¹⁸
  Schulze, A. Lack of creatine in muscle and brain in an adult with GAMT deficiency. Ann Neurol. 2003;53(2):248–251.
• ¹⁹
  Desroches, C, Patel, J, Wang, P. Carrier frequency of guanidinoacetate methyltransferase deficiency in the general population by functional characterization of missense variants in the GAMT gene. Mol Genet Genomics. 2015;290(6):2163–2171.
• ²⁰
  Schulze, A, Ebinger, F, Rating, D, Mayatepek, E. Improving treatment of guanidinoacetate methyltransferase deficiency: reduction of guanidinoacetic acid in body fluids by arginine restriction and ornithine supplementation. Mol Genet Metab. 2001;74(4):413–4
• ²¹
  Arias-Dimas, A, Vilaseca, MA, Artuch, R, Ribes, A, Campistol, J. Diagnosis and treatment of brain creatine deficiency syndromes. Rev Neurol. 2006;43(5):302–308.
• ²²
  Braissant, O. Creatine and guanidinoacetate transport at blood-brain and blood-cerebrospinal fluid barriers. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2012;35(4):655–664.
• ²³
  Braissant, O, Henry, H, Béard, E. Creatine deficiency syndromes and the importance of creatine synthesis in the brain. Amino Acids. 2011;40(5):1315–1324.
• ²⁴
  Braissant, O, Henry, H. AGAT, GAMT and SLC6A8 distribution in the central nervous system, in relation to creatine deficiency syndromes: a review. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2008;31(2):230–239.
• ²⁵
  Joncquel-Chevalier Curt, M, Voicu, P, Fontaine, M. Creatine biosynthesis and transport in health and disease. Biochimie. 2015;119:146–165.
• ²⁶
  Peral, M, Vázquez-Carretero, M, Ilundain, A. Na+/Cl−/creatine transporter activity and expression in rat brain synaptosomes. Neuroscience. 2010;165(1):53–60.
• ²⁷
  Almeida, L, Rosenberg, E, Verhoeven, N, Jakobs, C, Salomons, G. Are cerebral creatine deficiency syndromes on the radar screen? Future Neurol. 2006;1(5):637–649.
• ²⁸
  Meyer, L, Machado, L, Santiago, A. Mitochondrial creatine kinase activity prevents reactive oxygen species generation: antioxidant role of mitochondrial kinase-dependent ADP recycling activity. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(49):37361–37371.
• ²⁹
  Sestili, P, Martinelli, C, Bravi, G. Creatine supplementation affords cytoprotection in oxidatively injured cultured mammalian cells via direct antioxidant activity. Free Radic Biol. Med. 2006;40(5):837–849.
• ³⁰
  Lawler, J, Barnes, W, Wu, G. Direct antioxidant properties of creatine. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;290(1):47–52.
• ³¹
  Sestili, P, Martinelli, C, Colombo, E. Creatine as an antioxidant. Amino Acids. 2011;40(5):1385–1396.
• ³²
  Qasim, N, Mahmood, R. Diminution of oxidative damage to human erythrocytes and lymphocytes by creatine: possible role of creatine in blood. Plos One. 2015;10(11):e0141975.
• ³³
  Kolling, J, Wyse, A. Creatine prevents the inhibition of energy metabolism and lipid peroxidation in rats subjected to GAA administration. Metab Brain Dis. 2010;25(3):331–338.
• ³⁴
  Kolling, J, Scherer, E, Siebert, C. Creatine prevents the imbalance of redox homeostasis caused by homocysteine in skeletal muscle of rats. Gene. 2014;545(1):72–79.
• ³⁵
  Wyse, A, Netto, C. Behavioral and neurochemical effects of proline. Metab Brain Dis. 2011;26(3):159–172.
• ³⁶
  D’Hooge, R, Pei, Y, Marescau, B, De Deyn, P. Convulsive action and toxicity of uremic guanidino compounds: behavioral assessment and relation to brain concentration in adult mice. J Neurol Sci. 1992;112(1-2):96–105.
• ³⁷
  Neu, A, Neuhoff, H, Trube, G. Activation of GABAA receptors by guanidinoacetate: a novel pathophysiological mechanism. Neurobiol Dis. 2002;11(2):298–307.
• ³⁸
  Schulze, A, Tran, C, Levandovskiy, V, Patel, V, Cortez, M. Systemic availability of guanidinoacetate affects GABAA receptor function and seizure threshold in GAMT deficient mice. Amino Acids. 2016;48(8):2041–2047.
• ³⁹
  Zugno, A, Scherer, E, Schuck, P. Intrastriatal administration of guanidinoacetate inhibits Na+, K+-ATPase and creatine kinase activities in rat striatum. Metab Brain Dis. 2006;21(1):39–48.
• ⁴⁰
  Zugno, A, Stefanello, F, Scherer, E. Guanidinoacetate decreases antioxidant defenses and total protein sulfhydryl content in striatum of rats. Neurochem Res. 2008;33(9):1804–1810.
• ⁴¹
  Zugno, A, Pereira, L, Mattos, C. Guanidinoacetate administration increases acetylcholinesterase activity in striatum of rats and impairs retention of an inhibitory avoidance task. Metab Brain Dis. 2008;23(2):189–198.
• ⁴²
  Zugno, A, Oliveira, D, Scherer, E, Wajner, M, Wofchuk, S, Wyse, A. Guanidinoacetate inhibits glutamate uptake in rat striatum of rats at different ages. Neurochem Res. 2007;32(6):959–964.
• ⁴³
  Schulze, A, Hess, T, Wevers, R. Creatine deficiency syndrome caused by guanidinoacetate methyltransferase deficiency: diagnostic tools for a new inborn error of metabolism. J Pediatr. 1997;131(4):626–631.
• ⁴⁴
  Verhoeven, N. Enzyme assay for diagnosis of guanidinoacetate methyltransferase deficiency. Clin Chem. 2004;50(2):441–443.
• ⁴⁵
  Kim, H, Kim, C, Carpentier, A, Poortmans, JR. Studies on the safety of creatine supplementation. Amino Acids. 2011;40(5):1409–1418.
• ⁴⁶
  Peters, B, Hall, M, Liu, X. Low-dose creatine supplementation lowers plasma guanidinoacetate, but not plasma homocysteine, in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Nutr. 2015;145(10):2245–2252.
• ⁴⁷
  Dhar, S, Scaglia, F, Li, F. Expanded clinical and molecular spectrum of guanidinoacetate methyltransferase (GAMT) deficiency. Mol Genet Metab. 2009;96(1):38–43.
• ⁴⁸
  Stockler, S, van Karnebeek, C, Longo, N. Guanidinoacetate methyltransferase (GAMT) deficiency: outcomes in 48 individuals and recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and monitoring. Mol Genet Metab. 2014;111(1):16–25.
• ⁴⁹
  Mercimek-Mahmutoglu, S, Salomons, G, Chan, A. Case study for the evaluation of current treatment recommendations of guanidinoacetate methyltransferase deficiency: ineffectiveness of sodium benzoate. Pediatr Neurol. 2014;51(1):133–137.
• ⁵⁰
  Viau, K, Ernst, S, Pasquali, M. Evidence-based treatment of guanidinoacetate methyltransferase (GAMT) deficiency. Mol Genet Metab. 2013;110(3):255–262.
• ⁵¹
  Mercimek-Mahmutoglu, S, Dunbar, M, Friesen, A. Evaluation of two year treatment outcome and limited impact of arginine restriction in a patient with GAMT deficiency. Mol Genet Metab. 2012;105(1):155–158.
• ⁵²
  Akiyama, T, Osaka, H, Shimbo, H. A Japanese adult case of guanidinoacetate methyltransferase deficiency. JIMD Rep. 2014;12:65–69.
• ⁵³
  Cheillan, D. Prenatal diagnosis of guanidinoacetate methyltransferase deficiency: increased guanidinoacetate concentrations in amniotic fluid. Clin Chem. 2006;52(4):775–777.
• ⁵⁴
  Mercimek-Mahmutoglu, S, Pop, A, Kanhai, W. A pilot study to estimate incidence of guanidinoacetate methyltransferase deficiency in newborns by direct sequencing of the GAMT gene. Gene. 2016;575(1):127–131.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  30 May 2019
• Date of issue
  2016

History

• Received
  30 Mar 2016
• Reviewed
  05 June 2016
• Accepted
  20 July 2016