Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Sonographic elbow scanning is not yoga exercise

Patient positioning; Ultrasound scan; Elbow ultrasonography

Main text

We have read the manuscript by Abogamal and colleagues with interest [11. Abogamal A , Ghanem S , Saad H . A single simple position for ultrasound assessment of both common extensor and common flexor origin at the elbow . Adv Rheumatol . 2019 ; 59 ( 1 ):11.]. The article describes a comparison of the 90-degree flexion/neutral position of the elbow, sometimes called the “crab” (usually used for the posterior window evaluation) [22. Reijnierse M, Kelemouridou M, Miller TT. Video: musculoskeletal ultrasound imaging of the elbow: part 1, Normal anatomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 ;200(6):W644.], with a standard position. Their results showed a highly significant difference in favor of the 90-degree flexion position. We congratulate the authors for their effort in drawing attention to improve ultrasound elbow scanning ergonomy. Importantly, it has already been reported that repetitive ultrasound examinations may result in musculoskeletal pain in ultrasound practitioners [33. Claes F , Berger J , Stassijns G . Arm and neck pain in ultrasonographers . Hum Factors . 2015 ; 57 : 238 – 45 .]. However, according to our experience, the proposed 90-degree flexion position is not only uncomfortable for the examiner but also for the patient, already presenting with preexisting elbow pain. The position is coupled with internal rotation and extension of the shoulder, and as apparent from the Fig. 3c also shoulder abduction and an excessive wrist extension. Herewith, this position imposes abnormal pressure on the joints which may cause unnecessary loading of the musculoskeletal system of the patient. Furthermore, the proposed positioning is coupled with a need to change the position to assess the medial and lateral elbow compartments dynamically. In the medial compartment, the examiner may need to perform the dynamic valgus stress test to assess the integrity of the anterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament. On the lateral side, the examiner may need to perform dynamic scanning to evaluate annular ligament and rule out possible occult fractures of the radial head. On the contrary, Mezian and colleagues proposed and published a more ergonomic protocol for all elbow regions examination with the patient lying semisupine on the examination bed [44. Mezian K , Machač S , Zavareh A , Majerníková L , Vacek J , Navrátil L , Schmitz M . Positioning techniques to improve the ultrasound evaluation of the elbow . Ultrasound Q . 2019 ; 35 ( 2 ): 136 – 41 .]. In the future, we suggest a study to compare the semisupine approach to a “standard” protocol [55. Özçakar L, Kara M, Chang KV, et al. EURO-MUSCULUS/USPRM basic scanning protocols for elbow. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015 ;51:485–9.]. We believe this is of utmost importance for a smooth workflow for musculoskeletal ultrasonographers to prevent chronic injuries and improve the quality of the examination.

References

  • 1
    Abogamal A , Ghanem S , Saad H . A single simple position for ultrasound assessment of both common extensor and common flexor origin at the elbow . Adv Rheumatol . 2019 ; 59 ( 1 ):11.
  • 2
    Reijnierse M, Kelemouridou M, Miller TT. Video: musculoskeletal ultrasound imaging of the elbow: part 1, Normal anatomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 ;200(6):W644.
  • 3
    Claes F , Berger J , Stassijns G . Arm and neck pain in ultrasonographers . Hum Factors . 2015 ; 57 : 238 – 45 .
  • 4
    Mezian K , Machač S , Zavareh A , Majerníková L , Vacek J , Navrátil L , Schmitz M . Positioning techniques to improve the ultrasound evaluation of the elbow . Ultrasound Q . 2019 ; 35 ( 2 ): 136 – 41 .
  • 5
    Özçakar L, Kara M, Chang KV, et al. EURO-MUSCULUS/USPRM basic scanning protocols for elbow. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015 ;51:485–9.
  • Availability of data and materials
  • N/A
  • Ethics approval and consent to participate
  • N/A
  • Consent for publication
  • N/A
  • Publisher’s Note
  • Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
  • Funding
    None.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    08 Aug 2019
  • Date of issue
    2019

History

  • Received
    12 Mar 2019
  • Reviewed
    19 July 2019
  • Accepted
    29 July 2019
Sociedade Brasileira de Reumatologia Av. Brigadeiro Luís Antônio, 2466, Jardim Paulista, 01402-000 - São Paulo, SP, Tel.: +551132897165 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: rbreumatol@terra.com.br