Novos modelos organizacionais: paradoxos e contradições entre o discurso e a prática

Marcondes, Reynaldo Cavalheiro; Vasconcelos, Isabella Freitas Gouveia de; Vasconcelos, Flávio Carvalho de; Mascarenhas, André Ofenhejm

doi:10.1590/S0034-75902006000100002

FÓRUM

APRESENTAÇÃO

Novos modelos organizacionais: paradoxos e contradições entre o discurso e a prática

Reynaldo Cavalheiro Marcondes^I; Isabella Freitas Gouveia de Vasconcelos^II; Flávio Carvalho de Vasconcelos^III; André Ofenhejm Mascarenhas^IV

^IUniversidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie E-mail: reynaldo@mackenzie.com.br

^IIFGV-EAESP E-mail: ivasconcelos@yahoo.com

^IIIFGV-EAESP E-mail: fcvasconcelos@fgvsp.br

^IVFGV-EAESP E-mail: andremascar@gvmail.br

Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.

Full text available only in PDF format.

REFERÊNCIAS BIBLIOGRÁFICAS

ALTER, N. Logiques de l'entreprise informationnelle. In: Revue Française de Gestion, juin-juillet-août, p. 29-39, 1990.

ARGYRIS, C. On Organizational Learning. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1992.

BARTUNEK, J. M. The dynamics of personal and organizational reframing. In: QUINN, R. E.; CAMERON, K. (Eds.). Paradox and Transformation: Toward a Theory of Change in Organization and Management. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 1988. p. 137-162.

BERGER, P.; LUCKMANN, T. A construção social da realidade. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1989.

BION, W. R. Experiences in Groupes. New York: Basic Books, 1959.

BOUCHIKI, H. Living with and building on complexity: a constructivist perspective on organizations. Organization, v. 2, p. 217-232, 1998.

CAMERON, K. S.; QUINN, R. Organizational paradox and transformation. In QUINN, R. E.; CAMERON, K. S. (Eds.) Paradox and transformation: Toward a Theory and Change in Management. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 1998. p. 12-18.

CASTELLS, M. A sociedade em rede. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 1999.

DE MASI, D. O futuro do trabalho: fadiga e ócio na sociedade pós-industrial. Rio de Janeiro: José Olympio, 2000.

DEJOURS, C. Intelligence pratique et sagesse pratique: deux dimensions meconnues du travail réel”. Education Permanente, n. 116, p. 22-34, 1993.

EISENHARDT, K. M. Paradox, spirals, ambivalence: the new language of change and pluralism. The Academy of Management Review, v. 25, n. 4, p. 703-706, 2000.

EISENHARDT, K. M.; WESTCOTT, B. J. Paradoxical demands and the creation of excellence: the case of just-in-time manufacturing. In: QUINN, R. E.; CAMERON K. S. (Eds.). Paradox and Transformation: Toward a Theory of Change in Organization and Management. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 1988. p. 169-194.

ENRIQUEZ, E. L'organisation en analyse. Paris: P.U.F., 1991.

FARIA, J. H.; MENEGUETTI, F. Discursos organizacionais. In: ENCONTRO NACIONAL DA ASSOCIAÇÃO NACIONAL DOS PROGRAMAS DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO E PESQUISA EM ADMINISTRAÇÃO, 25., 2001, Campinas-SP. Anais. Campinas-SP: ANPAD, 2001.

FONSECA, V. E.; MACHADO-DA-SILVA, C. O indivíduo, a organização e o ambiente: bases para a conversação entre três perspectivas de estudo da estratégia em organizações. In: ENCONTRO NACIONAL DA ASSOCIAÇÃO NACIONAL DOS PROGRAMAS DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO E PESQUISA EM ADMINISTRAÇÃO, 25., 2001, Campinas-SP. Anais. Campi-nas-SP: ANPAD, 2001.

FORD, J. D.; FORD, L. W. Logics of identity, contradiction and attraction in change. Academy of Management Review, v. 19, p. 756-795, 1994.

HECKSCHER, C.; DONNELLON, A. The Post-Bureaucratic Organization. Thousands Oaks: Sage, 1994.

HECKSCHER, C.; MACCOBY, M.; RAMIREZ, R. Agents of Change: Crossing the Post-Industrial Divide. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.

HIRSCHHORN, L. Reworking Authority. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1997.

JAFFEE, D. Organization theory: tensions and change. New York: McGraw Hill, 1999.

KETS DE VRIES, M. F. R. Organizational Paradoxes: Clinical Approaches to Management. New York: Rudlege, 1995.

KOOT, W.; SABELIS, I.; YBEMA, S. Epilogue. In: KOOT, W.; SABELIS, I.; YBEMA, S. (Eds.). Contradictions in Context: Puzzling over Paradox in Comtemporary Organizations. Amsterdan: VU University Press, 1996. p. 208-212.

LEONARD-BARTON, D. Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, v. 13, p. 111-125, 1992.

LEWIS, M. W. Exploring paradox: toward a more comprehensive guide. The Academy of Management Review, v. 25. n. 4, p. 760-776, 2000.

MCKINLEY, W.; SCHERER, A. G. Some unanticipated consequences of organizational restructuring, The Academy of Management Review, v. 25. n. 4, p. 735-752, 2000.

MERTON, R. Social Theory and Social Structure. Glencoe: Free Press, 1957.

MEYER, J. W.; ROWAN, B. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony, In: POWELL W.; DIMAGGIO P. (Eds.). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1991. p. 41-62.

MINTZBERG, H. Criando organizações eficazes. São Paulo: Atlas, 2000.

PAGÈS, M.; BONETTI, M.; GAULEJAC, V.; DESCENDRE, D. L' emprise de l'organisation. Paris: P.U.F., 1991.

PESQUEUX, I.; RAMANANTSOA, B.; SAUDAN, A.; TOURNAND, J. C. Mercure et Minerve: perspectives philosophiques sur l'entreprise. Paris: Ellipses, 1999.

POWELL, W.; DIMAGGIO, P. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analyses. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1991.

SAINSAULIEU, R. L'identité au travail. Paris: Presses de la Fondation Nationale de L'Institut d'Études Politiques, 1977.

SAINSAULIEU, R. La régulation culturelle des ensembles organisés. L'Année Sociologique, p. 195-217, 1983.

SENGE, P. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday, 1990.

VASCONCELOS, F.; VASCONCELOS, I. The limits of ISO 9000 consulting methods: towards a multidimensional approach. Washington: Academy of Management Conference, 2001.

VASCONCELOS, F.; VASCONCELOS, I. Paradoxos organizacionais. São Paulo: Thomson Learning Pioneira, 2004.

Aprovado em 30.11.2005.

Artigo convidado.

ARGYRIS, C. On Organizational Learning Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1992.
BERGER, P.; LUCKMANN, T. A construção social da realidade Petrópolis: Vozes, 1989.
BION, W. R. Experiences in Groupes New York: Basic Books, 1959.
BOUCHIKI, H. Living with and building on complexity: a constructivist perspective on organizations. Organization, v. 2, p. 217-232, 1998.
CASTELLS, M. A sociedade em rede São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 1999.
DE MASI, D. O futuro do trabalho: fadiga e ócio na sociedade pós-industrial Rio de Janeiro: José Olympio, 2000.
EISENHARDT, K. M. Paradox, spirals, ambivalence: the new language of change and pluralism. The Academy of Management Review, v. 25, n. 4, p. 703-706, 2000.
ENRIQUEZ, E. L'organisation en analyse Paris: P.U.F., 1991.
FORD, J. D.; FORD, L. W. Logics of identity, contradiction and attraction in change. Academy of Management Review, v. 19, p. 756-795, 1994.
HECKSCHER, C.; DONNELLON, A. The Post-Bureaucratic Organization Thousands Oaks: Sage, 1994.
HECKSCHER, C.; MACCOBY, M.; RAMIREZ, R. Agents of Change: Crossing the Post-Industrial Divide Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
HIRSCHHORN, L. Reworking Authority Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1997.
JAFFEE, D. Organization theory: tensions and change New York: McGraw Hill, 1999.
KETS DE VRIES, M. F. R. Organizational Paradoxes: Clinical Approaches to Management New York: Rudlege, 1995.
LEONARD-BARTON, D. Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, v. 13, p. 111-125, 1992.
LEWIS, M. W. Exploring paradox: toward a more comprehensive guide. The Academy of Management Review, v. 25. n. 4, p. 760-776, 2000.
MCKINLEY, W.; SCHERER, A. G. Some unanticipated consequences of organizational restructuring, The Academy of Management Review, v. 25. n. 4, p. 735-752, 2000.
MERTON, R. Social Theory and Social Structure Glencoe: Free Press, 1957.
MINTZBERG, H. Criando organizações eficazes São Paulo: Atlas, 2000.
PAGÈS, M.; BONETTI, M.; GAULEJAC, V.; DESCENDRE, D. L' emprise de l'organisation Paris: P.U.F., 1991.
PESQUEUX, I.; RAMANANTSOA, B.; SAUDAN, A.; TOURNAND, J. C. Mercure et Minerve: perspectives philosophiques sur l'entreprise Paris: Ellipses, 1999.
POWELL, W.; DIMAGGIO, P. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analyses Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1991.
SAINSAULIEU, R. L'identité au travail Paris: Presses de la Fondation Nationale de L'Institut d'Études Politiques, 1977.
SAINSAULIEU, R. La régulation culturelle des ensembles organisés. L'Année Sociologique, p. 195-217, 1983.
SENGE, P. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization New York: Doubleday, 1990.
VASCONCELOS, F.; VASCONCELOS, I. The limits of ISO 9000 consulting methods: towards a multidimensional approach. Washington: Academy of Management Conference, 2001.
VASCONCELOS, F.; VASCONCELOS, I. Paradoxos organizacionais São Paulo: Thomson Learning Pioneira, 2004.

Datas de Publicação

Publicação nesta coleção
03 Fev 2011
Data do Fascículo
Mar 2006

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

[2] ARGYRIS, C. On Organizational Learning Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1992.

[4] BERGER, P.; LUCKMANN, T. A construção social da realidade Petrópolis: Vozes, 1989.

[5] BION, W. R. Experiences in Groupes New York: Basic Books, 1959.

[6] BOUCHIKI, H. Living with and building on complexity: a constructivist perspective on organizations. Organization, v. 2, p. 217-232, 1998.

[8] CASTELLS, M. A sociedade em rede São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 1999.

[9] DE MASI, D. O futuro do trabalho: fadiga e ócio na sociedade pós-industrial Rio de Janeiro: José Olympio, 2000.

[11] EISENHARDT, K. M. Paradox, spirals, ambivalence: the new language of change and pluralism. The Academy of Management Review, v. 25, n. 4, p. 703-706, 2000.

[13] ENRIQUEZ, E. L'organisation en analyse Paris: P.U.F., 1991.

[16] FORD, J. D.; FORD, L. W. Logics of identity, contradiction and attraction in change. Academy of Management Review, v. 19, p. 756-795, 1994.

[17] HECKSCHER, C.; DONNELLON, A. The Post-Bureaucratic Organization Thousands Oaks: Sage, 1994.

[18] HECKSCHER, C.; MACCOBY, M.; RAMIREZ, R. Agents of Change: Crossing the Post-Industrial Divide Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.

[19] HIRSCHHORN, L. Reworking Authority Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1997.

[20] JAFFEE, D. Organization theory: tensions and change New York: McGraw Hill, 1999.

[21] KETS DE VRIES, M. F. R. Organizational Paradoxes: Clinical Approaches to Management New York: Rudlege, 1995.

[23] LEONARD-BARTON, D. Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, v. 13, p. 111-125, 1992.

[24] LEWIS, M. W. Exploring paradox: toward a more comprehensive guide. The Academy of Management Review, v. 25. n. 4, p. 760-776, 2000.

[25] MCKINLEY, W.; SCHERER, A. G. Some unanticipated consequences of organizational restructuring, The Academy of Management Review, v. 25. n. 4, p. 735-752, 2000.

[26] MERTON, R. Social Theory and Social Structure Glencoe: Free Press, 1957.

[28] MINTZBERG, H. Criando organizações eficazes São Paulo: Atlas, 2000.

[29] PAGÈS, M.; BONETTI, M.; GAULEJAC, V.; DESCENDRE, D. L' emprise de l'organisation Paris: P.U.F., 1991.

[30] PESQUEUX, I.; RAMANANTSOA, B.; SAUDAN, A.; TOURNAND, J. C. Mercure et Minerve: perspectives philosophiques sur l'entreprise Paris: Ellipses, 1999.

[31] POWELL, W.; DIMAGGIO, P. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analyses Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1991.

[32] SAINSAULIEU, R. L'identité au travail Paris: Presses de la Fondation Nationale de L'Institut d'Études Politiques, 1977.

[33] SAINSAULIEU, R. La régulation culturelle des ensembles organisés. L'Année Sociologique, p. 195-217, 1983.

[34] SENGE, P. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization New York: Doubleday, 1990.

[35] VASCONCELOS, F.; VASCONCELOS, I. The limits of ISO 9000 consulting methods: towards a multidimensional approach. Washington: Academy of Management Conference, 2001.

[36] VASCONCELOS, F.; VASCONCELOS, I. Paradoxos organizacionais São Paulo: Thomson Learning Pioneira, 2004.

Brasil

Brasil

Novos modelos organizacionais: paradoxos e contradições entre o discurso e a prática

Datas de Publicação