Effect of mitral valve repair on cardiopulmonary exercise testing variables in patients with chronic mitral regurgitation

Abstracts

BACKGROUND: Mitral valve repair is the surgical procedure of choice for patients with chronic Mitral Regurgitation (MR). The good early and late results allow surgical indication before symptom onset. The cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) can objectively assess functional capacity, but little is known about the effect of surgery on their variables. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the effects of mitral repair on CPET variables in patients with chronic MR. METHODS: A total of 47 patients with severe MR were selected; these patients underwent mitral valve repair and were submitted to CPET ± 30 days before surgery, as well as six to 12 months after the surgery. RESULTS: There was predominance of functional class I or II NYHA in 30 (63.8%) and 34 patients (72.3%), respectively. A significant decrease in oxygen consumption (VO2) was observed after surgery, from 1,719 ± 571 to 1609 ± 428 mL min-1, p = 0.036. There was a decrease in Oxygen Uptake Efficiency Slope (OUES) from 1,857 ± 594 to 1763 ± 514, p = 0.073 and oxygen pulse (O2) increased after surgery, from 11.1 ± 3.2 to 11.9 ± 3, 2 mL.beat-1 (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: The mitral valve repair did not increase peak VO2 and OUES despite positive cardiac remodeling observed seven months after surgery. However, O2 pulse increased postoperatively, suggesting improved LV systolic performance. The CPET is a useful tool to assist in the medical management of patients with MR. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2013; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0)

Mitral Valve Insufficiency; Exercise; Rehabilitation

FUNDAMENTO: A plástica valvar mitral é o procedimento cirúrgico de escolha para pacientes com Insuficiência Mitral (IM) crônica. Os bons resultados imediatos e tardios permitem a indicação cirúrgica antes do início dos sintomas. O teste cardiopulmonar de exercício (TCPE) pode avaliar objetivamente a capacidade funcional, mas pouco se conhece o efeito da cirurgia em suas variáveis. OBJETIVOS: Avaliar os efeitos da plástica mitral nas variáveis do TCPE em pacientes com IM crônica. MÉTODOS: Foram selecionados 47 pacientes com IM grave e submetidos plástica da valva mitral, sendo nestes, realizado TCPE ± 30 dias antes da cirurgia, e de seis a 12 meses após a cirurgia. RESULTADOS: Houve predominância da classe funcional I ou II pela NYHA em 30 pacientes (63,8%) e 34 pacientes (72,3%), respectivamente. Após a cirurgia foi observado uma diminuição significativa do consumo de oxigênio (VO2), de 1.719 ± 571 para 1.609 ± 428 mL.min-1, p = 0,036. Houve redução do Oxygen Uptake Efficiency Slope (OUES), de 1.857 ± 594 para 1.763 ± 514, p = 0,073 e o pulso de oxigênio (O2) aumentou após a cirurgia, de 11,1 ± 3,2 para 11,9 ± 3,2 mL.bat-1 (p = 0,003). CONCLUSÃO: A plástica da valva mitral, não determinou aumento do VO2 pico e do OUES apesar do remodelamento cardíaco positivo observado após sete meses de cirurgia. Entretanto, o pulso de O2 aumentou no pós-operatório, sugerindo melhora do desempenho sistólico do VE. O TCPE é uma ferramenta útil, podendo auxiliar na conduta médica em pacientes com IM.

Insuficiência da Valva Mitral; Exercício; Reabilitação

Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, São Paulo, SP - Brasil

Mailing Address

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mitral valve repair is the surgical procedure of choice for patients with chronic Mitral Regurgitation (MR). The good early and late results allow surgical indication before symptom onset. The cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) can objectively assess functional capacity, but little is known about the effect of surgery on their variables.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the effects of mitral repair on CPET variables in patients with chronic MR.

METHODS: A total of 47 patients with severe MR were selected; these patients underwent mitral valve repair and were submitted to CPET ± 30 days before surgery, as well as six to 12 months after the surgery.

RESULTS: There was predominance of functional class I or II NYHA in 30 (63.8%) and 34 patients (72.3%), respectively. A significant decrease in oxygen consumption (VO₂) was observed after surgery, from 1,719 ± 571 to 1609 ± 428 mL min-1, p = 0.036. There was a decrease in Oxygen Uptake Efficiency Slope (OUES) from 1,857 ± 594 to 1763 ± 514, p = 0.073 and oxygen pulse (O₂) increased after surgery, from 11.1 ± 3.2 to 11.9 ± 3, 2 mL.beat-1 (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION: The mitral valve repair did not increase peak VO₂ and OUES despite positive cardiac remodeling observed seven months after surgery. However, O₂ pulse increased postoperatively, suggesting improved LV systolic performance. The CPET is a useful tool to assist in the medical management of patients with MR. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2013; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0)

Keywords: Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery; Exercise; Rehabilitation.

Introduction

In recent decades, remarkable progress has occurred regarding the understanding of pathophysiology, clinical management and treatment of mitral regurgitation (MR). Advances in diagnostic and surgical techniques, with the possibility of increasing preservation of valve apparatus and left ventricular function, has attracted increasing interest in this disease.

The presence of heart failure symptoms is an important tool to evaluate patients with MR and a strong indicator of quality of life and surgical indication, according to current guidelines^1-3.

In the patient with asymptomatic MR and good ventricular function, surgery may be considered if there is high probability of successful mitral valve repair, but this strategy is not universally accepted⁴.

However, in patients with chronic MR, symptoms may appear only in the later stages of the disease and sometimes coincide with irreversible myocardial damage. Furthermore, assessment of functional class (FC) is subjective and may be influenced in several situations, such as in sedentary life style, common in the elderly, in exercise restriction, in the presence of obesity or orthopedic problems.

The cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) more objectively assesses the capacity to exercise, minimizing the subjective aspects of obtaining the medical history. In patients with valvular heart disease, the CPET can assess the presence of symptoms, functional capacity and hemodynamic effect.

Few studies have been carried out using CPET in patients with MR and the effects of mitral valve repair, including the preservation of left ventricular function, on exercise capacity^5,6.

Objectives

to evaluate the influence of mitral valve repair on the cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) variables in patients with chronic, nonischemic, severe, organic MR.

Methods

Consecutive patients with a diagnosis of chronic, nonischemic, severe, organic MR and surgical repair indication were selected based on the guidelines of AHA/ACC¹; these patients were followed at the preoperative outpatient clinic of the Valve Disease Medical Section of Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, from August 2008 to January 2011.

Patients with coronary artery disease, associated valvular heart disease, previous cardiac surgery, dilated cardiomyopathy unrelated to MR and moderate or severe lung disease were excluded.

The CPET was performed on an Inbramed treadmill and a Medical Graphics Corporation® (Minnesota, USA) Cardio O₂ gas analyzer was used to measure exhaled gases, using sensors that allow breath-by-breath analysis with real-time plotting of the mean of seven exhalations. The patients breathed exclusively through a plastic mouthpiece attached to a disposable differential pressure Pitot pneumotachometer with 20 mL of dead space after they had the nasal cavity occluded with a clamp.

Bruce's modified protocol was applied for CPET on a treadmill to make it similar to a ramp, with small increments every two minutes. The recovery phase was active in the first two minutes with a velocity of 2.7 km/h, with no inclination and the remaining four, with the patient in the sitting position.

The exercise intensity was considered satisfactory and the exercise classified as maximum, if the respiratory exchange ratio (RER) reached values > 1.10, associated with symptoms of maximal effort, fatigue or breathlessness.

The following variables were obtained for analysis and expressed in tables or charts: oxygen consumption (VO₂) at anaerobic threshold and peak, oxygen pulse (VO₂ / HR), VE/VCO₂ slope, respiratory exchange ratio - RER (VCO₂ / VO₂) and the slope of the curve representing the logarithmic relationship between ventilation and oxygen consumption, the Oxygen Uptake Efficiency slope (OUES).

Initially, all variables were submitted to an exploratory, descriptive and graphical assessment (Box-Plot), used to observe the behavior of measures and also identify possible typos and outliers. The results were summarized as mean and standard deviation (SD), median and 25 (25^th Per) and 75 (75^th Per) percentiles for quantitative variable and in frequencies, absolute (n) and relative (%) for qualitative variables.

The distribution of quantitative measurements was also assessed by the normality test of Kolmogorov-Smirnov. When the normal distribution was not rejected, the paired Student's t test was used to compare before and after surgery. When normality was rejected or to obtain ordinal qualitative measure, the nonparametric Wilcoxon test was used in this comparison.

The present investigation was approved by the Ethics Committee of Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia during a meeting on 01.04.2008, according to Resolution N. 3596. All participants signed the free and informed consent form.

Results

Between August 2008 and January 2011, 47 patients (mean age 48.5, SD = 17.5 years), of which 30 were males (63.8%) were prospectively and consecutively evaluated. The predominant etiology was degenerative (35 patients - 74.5%), 34 patients (72.3%) were in NYHA functional class I or II and three patients (6.4%) had permanent AF.

The main preoperative clinical characteristics expressed in frequency (n and %) are shown in Table 1.

The description of the surgical techniques performed in the 47 study patients is summarized in Table 2.

Of the 47 patients who underwent mitral valve repair, 33 patients (70.2%) had absent, minimal or mild residual regurgitation; three patients (6.4%) had mild to moderate, seven patients (14.9% ) had moderate, two patients (4.3%) had moderate to severe and two patients (4.3%) had significant residual regurgitation. The two patients with significant residual MR did not undergo CPET postoperatively, having been submitted to previous surgery and were excluded from the CPET database. The other patients with residual MR are being clinically monitored.

The pre- and postoperative echocardiographic studies were performed on average 42.2 (7.8) days (median = 22.5 days) before and 218.1 (37.2) days (median = 203.0 days) after surgery.

After surgery, there were significant reductions in echocardiographic measurements of cardiac remodeling, as shown in Table 3.

The CPETs were carried out on average 31.6 (29.4) days (median = 22.0 days) before and 219.1 (38.3) days (median = 201.0 days) after surgery.

After mitral valve repair, there was a significant reduction in peak VO₂. The variable VE/VCO₂ slope showed no significant difference in mean values pre- and postoperatively and OUES values showed a slight reduction after surgery, from 1857 (594) to 1763 (514), p = 0.073. O₂ pulse after surgery increased from 11.1 (3.2) to 11.9 (3.2) mL.beat-1, p = 0.003. Table 4 shows the pre- and postoperative comparisons of CPET variables and Figure 1 shows the individual profiles of pre- and postoperative VO2, O2 pulse and OUES values.

Discussion

Chronic MR has a complex pathophysiology and causes LV volume overload, which can lead to irreversible decline of its contractility. The favorable LV loading conditions during the long period of its natural history allows the patient to remain asymptomatic or exhibit few symptoms, even in the presence of LV contractile dysfunction^7,8.

Definitive treatment of chronic and severe MR is surgical and includes mitral valve replacement and mitral valve repair. Mitral valve repair has some advantages over valve replacement, including not requiring anticoagulant therapy in patients with sinus rhythm, preserving the ventricular-valvular integrity, maintaining LV function and showing lower mortality in the immediate and late postoperative period^9,10.

Current guidelines^1-3 recommend surgical intervention in severe and chronic MR and in the presence of heart failure symptoms or when there is evidence of LV dysfunction, PAH or atrial fibrillation. In the absence of symptoms and markers of poor prognosis, the ideal time for surgical intervention is controversial, even in the presence of high probability of successful mitral valve repair⁴. In a study by Rosenhek et al¹¹, patients with asymptomatic MR were clinically followed in a strategy known as 'watchful waiting', with good clinical results until the onset of symptoms or evidence of LV dysfunction, PAH or atrial fibrillation.

The guidelines of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology³ recommend clinical follow-up of asymptomatic patients with good LV systolic function, with sporadic reassessments every six to 12 months, as well as monitoring of echocardiographic parameters.

Therefore, the presence of symptoms is an important marker of surgical indication. The limitations and difficulties of adequately quantifying functional class, especially in sedentary individuals, suggest the need for a more accurate assessment¹². The CPET fills that gap by providing a quantitative and noninvasive assessment of FC, as well as several variables for prognostic stratification¹³. However, CPET remains poorly understood and underutilized in current clinical practice. This is mainly due to the costs related to the collection and analysis of expired gases and lack of trained personnel to apply and interpret test results.

The combined evaluation of conventional exercise testing and direct measurement of oxygen consumption (VO₂), carbon dioxide production (VCO₂) and ventilation (VE), analyzed individually or associated in different combinations, provide a detailed and integrated analysis of responses to exercise involving the cardiovascular, pulmonary, hematopoietic, neuropsychological and muscular systems.

Few studies have evaluated exercise capacity after cardiac surgery, particularly in patients with valvular disease^14-16. In a study by Le Tourneau et al⁵, CPET, radionuclide angiography and blood samples for assessment of neurohormonal status were obtained before and before one year (216 ± 80 days) after surgery in 40 patients with non-ischemic MR (24 patients successfully submitted to valve repair and 16 to valve replacement). In spite of the improvement in NYHA FC, the exercise performance did not change after surgical correction of MR (VO₂ peak of 19.3 ± 6.1 mL.kg-1.min.-1 to 18.5 ± 5.6-mL.kg -1.min.-1 and achieved percentage of predicted VO₂ max. of 79.5% ± 18.2 to 76.8 ± 16.9%) in all patients, regardless of the type of surgery performed.

There were no differences between the groups before and after surgery, regarding tolerance to exercise assessed by peak O₂ pulse or percentage of predicted VO₂, as well as in patients classified according to preoperative EF (< 60% in 14 patients and > 60% in 26 patients) regarding the percentage of postoperative predicted VO₂ max. (74.2% ± 16.5 versus 77.1 ± 17.7%) or VO₂ max. (18.1 ± 6.9 mL.kg^-1.min.^-1versus 18.1 ± 4.7 mL.kg^-1.min.^-1). Therefore, there was no improvement in exercise tolerance after surgical correction of MR in untrained patients and the author considers that this result can be explained by the physical deconditioning induced by valvular heart disease or by the postoperative course.

Moreover, in the early postoperative period of cardiac surgery, many factors can contribute to a decrease in exercise capacity compared to preoperative level, among them: worsening in ventilation (by pleural effusion, atelectasis or phrenic nerve paralysis), congestive heart failure, anemia, decreased mobility of the ribs and the sternum, sinus tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, transient left ventricular dysfunction, and overall fatigue^17-19.

The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of mitral valve repair on the CPET variables in patients with chronic and isolated MR. The pre- and postoperative results of CPET variables were compared and the postoperative CPET was performed after a period of significant and progressive cardiac remodeling, as shown by echocardiography performed an average of eight months after valve surgery.

As might be expected, the postoperative echocardiogram showed a significant reduction in left atrial and ventricular volumes, in addition to a decrease in pulmonary artery pressure. Ejection fraction decreased significantly after surgery, but remained within the normal range at the postoperative period. These observations suggest that the patients involved in the study had their indication and surgical intervention performed before the onset of irreversible left ventricular dysfunction.

In both the pre- and postoperative periods, the quality or intensity of effort was considered satisfactory, as shown by the gas exchange ratio (RER) > 1.10, thus meeting the maximal effort criteria.

After surgery, VO₂ peak decreased significantly, from 1719 ± 571 to 1609 ± 428 mL min^-1 (p = 0.036) and the percentage of predicted VO₂ max achieved decreased from 75.5 ± 16.9% preoperatively to 70.1 ± 10.8% postoperatively (p = 0.017).

VO₂ max is an important CPET variable as it is considered the measurement that defines the limit of the cardiopulmonary system¹³ and represents the maximum level of oxidative metabolism involving large muscle groups²⁰. This variable, according to Fick's equation, it is the product of cardiac output and oxygen arteriovenous difference (O₂ av. diff). The main determinants of VO₂ max. are genetic factors and the amount of muscles involved in the exercise and also depends on sex, age and body surface, as well as the level of training or physical conditioning¹⁷. VO₂ max. is considered impaired when < 80% of its predicted value.

Although there was individual variation in our study, the absence of increase in VO₂ peak or its predicted percentage has been observed in a few previous studies carried out in patients with MR who underwent surgery^5,6. In the study by Kim HJ et al⁶ of 31 patients undergoing mitral valve repair, CPET performed before and one year after surgery showed no significant improvement in peak VO₂ (preoperative peak VO₂ of 23.1 ± 6.2 mL.kg-1.min-1 and postoperative of 22.9 ± 6.4 mL.kg^-1.min^-1, p = 0.82). The authors of this study suggest that CPET can be helpful in determining the timing of surgery and a preoperative value of VO₂ peak of 18.5 mL.kg-1.min-1 could be used as a marker of functional degree improvement.

The O₂ pulse provides an estimate of LV systolic volume and reflects the amount of O₂ transported and consumed by the body at each heartbeat. It is considered a strong predictor of mortality in patients with chronic cardiovascular disease²¹. In our study, the peak O₂ pulse showed a significant increase after surgery, from 11.1 ± 3.2 to 11.9 ± 3.2 mL.bat^-1 (p = 0.003), suggesting improvement in left ventricular performance.

The variable VE/VCO₂ slope was not significantly different after mitral valve repair surgery, with a postoperative value of 34.43 ± 4.61. This ratio describes ventilatory efficiency during exercise, showing the amount of air that must be ventilated to remove 1L of CO₂ and normal values are between 20.00 and 30.00¹⁸. In the study by Arena et al²² a VE/VCO₂ slope > 34.00 was a marker for poor prognosis in patients with heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction. We found no information in the literature on the behavior of this variable in patients with MR who underwent mitral valve repair, but the results of our study showed postoperative values close to the threshold of poor prognosis.

After surgery, OUES decreased from 1857 ± 594 (78.6 ± 15.5% of predicted value) to 1763 ± 514 (74.7 ± 14.6% of predicted value). There are no data in the literature on the behavior of this variable after cardiac surgery in patients with MR; however, a reduction in OUES was observed in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery, when compared to patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, as well as a significant improvement of this variable after physical training²³. The improvement in OUES has also been observed after exercise training in patients with HF²⁴, suggesting that a certain VO₂ is reached at a lower ventilatory cost. Previous studies suggest that OUES is strongly correlated with the peak VO₂^25,26.

In our study, it is likely that the reduction in OUES and VO₂ observed seven months after surgery occurred due to physical deconditioning and lack of training of patients in rehabilitation programs.

The benefits of physical reconditioning programs after mitral valve repair were observed in a previous multicenter study, with a significant increase of 22% in VO₂ peak and anaerobic threshold of 16%, regardless of age, sex, left ventricular function, presence of AF, hemoglobin concentration or medication use (beta-blocker or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor)²⁷.

Conclusions

We can conclude that in this prospective study of patients with chronic MR submitted to mitral valve repair and who did not participate in cardiac rehabilitation programs after surgery, there was no improvement in exercise capacity measured by CPET seven months after surgery, despite the significant positive cardiac remodeling. The O₂ pulse increased after surgery, suggesting improvement in left ventricular systolic performance.

The results of this study reinforce the need for patients to perform physical rehabilitation after surgery for mitral valve repair. The physical reconditioning programs allow a more complete and appropriate approach for patients during their postoperative course.

Potential Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Sources of Funding

There were no external funding sources for this study.

Study Association

This article is part of the thesis of doctoral submitted by Dorival Julio Della Togna, from Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia.

References

• 1. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Kanu C, de Leon AC Jr,Faxon DP, Freed MD, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2006;114(5):e84-231.
• 2. Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F,Androtti F, Antunes MJ, Baron-Esquivias G, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012): The Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2012;33(19):2451-96
• 3. Bacelar AC, Lopes AS, Fernandes As, Fernandes JR, Pires LJ, Moraes RC/sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia. I Diretriz Brasileira de valvopatias. I Diretriz interamericana de valvopatias/SIAC. Arq Bras Cardiol.2011;97(5 supl.1):1-67.
• 4. Griffin BP. Timing of surgical intervention in chronic mitral regurgitation: is vigilance enough? Circulation. 2006;113(18):2169-72.
• 5. Le Tourneau T, de Groete P, Millaire A, Foucher C, Savoye C, Pigny P, et al. Effect of mitral valve surgery on exercise capacity, ventricular ejection fraction and neurohormonal activation in patients with severe mitral regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36(7):2263-9.
• 6. Kim HJ, Ahn SJ, Park SW , Cho BR, Sung J, Hong SH, et al. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing before and one year after mitral valve repair for severe mitral regurgitation. Am J Cardiol. 2004;93(9):1187-9.
• 7. Delahaye JP, Gare JP, Viguier E, Delahaye F, De GG, Milon H. Natural history of severe mitral regurgitation. Eur Heart J. 1991;12( Suppl B):5-9.
• 8. Carabello BA. The pathophysiology of mitral regurgitation. J Heart Valve Dis. 2000;9(5):600-8.
• 9. Jokinen JJ, Hippelainen MJ, Pitkanen OA, Hartikainen JE. Mitral valve replacement versus repair: propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84(2):451-8.
• 10. Enriquez-Sarano M, Schaff HV, Orszulak TA, Tajik AJ, Bailey KR, Frye RL. Valve repair improves the outcome of surgery for mitral regurgitation. A multivariate analysis. Circulation. 1995;91(4):1022-8.
• 11. Rosenhek R, Rader F, Klaar U,Gabriel H, Krejc M, Kalbeck D, et al. Outcome of watchful waiting in asymptomatic severe mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 2006;113(18):2238-44.
• 12. Raphael C, Briscoe C, Davies J, Ian Wlhinnett Z, Manisty C, Sutton R, et al. Limitations of the New York Heart Association functional classification system and self-reported walking distances in chronic heart failure. Heart. 2007;93(4):476-82.
• 13. Balady GJ, Arena R, Sietsema K, Myers J, Coke L, Fletcher GF, et al. Clinician's Guide to cardiopulmonary exercise testing in adults: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010;122(2):191-225.
• 14. Horstkotte D, Niehues R, Schulte HD, Strauer BE. [Exercise capacity after heart valve replacement]. Z Kardiol. 1994;83 (Suppl 3):111-20.
• 15. Nakamura M, Chiba M, Ueshima K, Arakawa N, Yoshida H, Makita S, et al. Effects of mitral and/or aortic valve replacement or repair on endothelium-dependent peripheral vasorelaxation and its relation to improvement in exercise capacity. Am J Cardiol. 1996;77(1):98-102.
• 16. ul Haque ME, Sasaki S, Kuroda H, Ishiguro S, Ogino K, Kobayashi, et al.Hemodynamic changes during dynamic exercise in patients after mitral valve replacement for chronic mitral regurgitation. Indian Heart J. 1992;44(6):379-85.
• 17. Mezzani A, Agostoni P, Cohen-Solal A, Curra U, Jegier A, Kouidi E, et al. Standards for the use of cardiopulmonary exercise testing for the functional evaluation of cardiac patients: a report from the Exercise Physiology Section of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2009;16(3):249-67.
• 18. Sellier P, Chatellier G, D'Agrosa-Boiteux MC, Douard H, Dubois C, Goepfert PC, et al. Use of non-invasive cardiac investigations to predict clinical endpoints after coronary bypass graft surgery in coronary artery disease patients: results from the prognosis and evaluation of risk in the coronary operated patient (PERISCOP) study. Eur Heart J. 2003;24(10):916-26.
• 19. Weissman C. Pulmonary function after cardiac and thoracic surgery. Anesth Analg. 1999;88(6):1272-9.
• 20. Piepoli MF, Corra U, Agostoni PG , Belardinelli R, Cohen-Solal A,Hambrect R, et al.Statement on cardiopulmonary exercise testing in chronic heart failure due to left ventricular dysfunction: recommendations for performance and interpretation. Part I: definition of cardiopulmonary exercise testing parameters for appropriate use in chronic heart failure. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2006;13(2):150-64.
• 21. Oliveira RB, Myers J, Araujo CG, Abella J, Mandic S, Froelicher V. Maximal exercise oxygen pulse as a predictor of mortality among male veterans referred for exercise testing. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2009;16(3):358-64.
• 22. Arena R, Myers J, Abella J, Peberd MA, Bensimhon D, Chase P, et al.The ventilatory classification system effectively predicts hospitalization in patients with heart failure. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2008;28(3):195-8.
• 23. Defoor J, Schepers D, Reybrouck T, Fagard R, Vanhees L. Oxygen uptake efficiency slope in coronary artery disease: clinical use and response to training. Int J Sports Med. 2006;27(9):730-7.
• 24. Van Laethem C, Van De Veire, Bager G, Bihija S, Seghers T, Cambier D, et al. Response of the oxygen uptake efficiency slope to exercise training in patients with chronic heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2007;9(6-7):625-9.
• 25. Hollenberg M, Tager IB. Oxygen uptake efficiency slope: an index of exercise performance and cardiopulmonary reserve requiring only submaximal exercise. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36(1):194-201.
• 26. Pogliaghi S, Dussin E, Tarperi C, Cevese A, Schena F. Calculation of oxygen uptake efficiency slope based on heart rate reserve end-points in healthy elderly subjects. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007;101(6):691-6.
• 27. Meurin P, Iliou MC, Bem DA, Pierre B, Corone S, Cristofini P, et al. Early exercise training after mitral valve repair: a multicentric prospective French study. Chest. 2005;128(3):1638-44.

Effect of mitral valve repair on cardiopulmonary exercise testing variables in patients with chronic mitral regurgitation

Dorival Julio Della Togna; Alexandre Antônio da Cunha Abizaid; Romeu Sérgio Meneghelo; David Costa de Souza Le Bihan; Auristela Isabel de Oliveira Ramos; Samira Kaissar Nasr; Felipe Souza Maia; Zilda Machado Meneghelo; Amanda Guerra de Moraes Sousa

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  02 Apr 2013
• Date of issue
  Apr 2013

History

• Received
  02 Sept 2012
• Accepted
  21 Dec 2012
• Reviewed
  25 Nov 2012