Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Is the best resistance strategy against begomoviruses yet to come? A Comprehensive Review

Resistência é a melhor estratégia contra begomovírus? Uma revisão abrangente

ABSTRACT

The worldwide spread of Geminiviruses and its vector has been attributed to the high rate of recombination, mutation, presence of alternate hosts, transport of plant material, global human activity along with global trade, new agricultural practices and climate change; therefore, the most severe viral diseases among crops have grown in almost all regions of the world, including cassava viral diseases in Africa, cotton leaf curl disease in Pakistan, and multiple diseases related to tomatoes, legumes and cucurbits in India and all over the world. Begomovirus is the major and largest genus of Geminiviridae which has shown a worldwide increase in its variations and distribution by affecting previously unaffected plants. The increasing population has augmented the demand for a sustainable agriculture boost, but begomoviruses have become a continual threat to the world’s agriculture. Numerous control strategies have been used for the viral invasion of the world as pathogens but begomoviruses continually overcome the control methods, and this has generated a need to end this competition between researchers and begomoviruses. The present review summarizes all strategies used against begomoviruses and provides a comprehensive comparison among all control methods, their drawbacks, and future insights.

Keywords
geminiviruses; begomoviruses; control strategies; host resistance

RESUMO

A disseminação mundial de geminivírus e seu vetor tem sido atribuída à alta taxa de recombinação, mutação, presença de hospedeiros alternativos, transporte de material vegetal, atividade humana e o comércio globalizado, novas práticas agrícolas e mudanças climáticas. Portanto, as doenças virais mais graves cresceram em quase todas as culturas e regiões do mundo, por exemplo as doenças virais da mandioca na África, doença do enrolamento da folha do algodão no Paquistão e várias doenças em tomateiros, legumes e cucurbitáceas na Índia e em outras partes do mundo. O begomovírus é o principal gênero de Geminiviridae que tem apresentado aumento mundial em suas variações e distribuição afetando plantas anteriormente não afetadas. A população mundial crescente aumentou a demanda por uma agricultura sustentável, mas os begomovírus tornaram-se uma constante ameaça à agricultura mundial. Numerosas estratégias de controle têm sido usadas para este vírus em várias partes do mundo, mas os begomovírus superam continuamente os métodos de controle. A presente revisão resume todas as estratégias utilisadas contra begomovírus e fornece uma comparação abrangente entre os métodos de controle, suas desvantagens e futuras percepções.

Palavras Chave
geminivirus; begomovirus; estratégias de controle; resistência

Geminiviridae is the leading family of insect-transmitted single-stranded circular DNA plant viruses comprising more than 450 species (5757 Luna, A.P. and R. Lozano-Duran, Geminivirus-Encoded Proteins: Not All Positional Homologs Are Made Equal. Frontiers in Microbiology, v.11, p. 878, 2020.). Over the last several years, geminiviruses have gained the attention of researchers due to their ability to cause infection in cultivated, non-cultivated monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous vegetation worldwide (22 Agarwal G, Kavalappara SR, Gautam S, Silva AD, Simmons A, Srinivasan R, Dutta B. Field Screen and Genotyping of Phaseolus vulgaris against Two Begomoviruses in Georgia, USA. Insects, v.12, p.49, 2021.). Extensive geographic distribution of insect vectors and alternate host planting material due to inadequate quarantine measures around borders made geminiviruses a major limiting factor in the production of important agronomic crops of economic value, such as cotton, pepper, tomato, beans and cassava (8181 Shafiq, M., Asad, S., Zafar, Y., Briddon, RW., Manzoor, S., Pepper leaf curl Lahore virus requires the DNA B component of Tomato leaf curl New Delhi virus to cause leaf curl symptoms. Virology Journal, v.7, p. 367, 2010., 8787 Thakur, H., Jindal, S. K., Sharma, A., & Dhaliwal, M. S. Molecular mapping of dominant gene responsible for leaf curl virus resistance in chilli pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). 3 Biotech, v.10, p. 182, 2020.). Economic losses caused by geminiviruses to these crops have been estimated at around USD 5 billion for cotton in Pakistan, USD 140 million for tomato in Florida, USD 1300–2300 million for cassava in Africa, and USD 300 million for grain legumes in India (6262 More P, Agarwal P, Anand A, Sanan-Mishra N, Agarwal PK. Artificial miRNA mediated resistance in tobacco against Jatropha leaf curl Gujarat virus by targeting RNA silencing suppressors. Scientific Reports, v.11, p. 890, 2021.). Geminiviridae family is divided into 14 genera of plant viruses (Becurtovirus, Begomovirus, Capulavirus, Curtovirus, Eragrovirus, Grablovirus, Mastrevirus, Topocuvirus, and Turncurtovirus, Citlodavirus, Maldovirus, Mulcrilevirus, Opunvirus, and Topilevirus) based on insect vectors, genome organization, and host range and phylogeny. The whitefly (Bemisia tabaci G.) transmits wide-reach geminiviruses belonging to the largest genus Begomovirus; approximately 409 species make it a diversified genus of Geminiviridae family. Begomoviruses with one-molecule genomes are known as monopartite, and those with two-molecule genomes are known as bipartite. Irrespective of whether the genome is mono or bi-partite, the size of each genomic DNA molecule is 2.8 to 3kb (7575 Roumagnac P, Lett JM, Fiallo-Olivé E, Navas-Castillo J, Zerbini FM, Martin DP, Varsani A. Establishment of five new genera in the family Geminiviridae: Citlodavirus, Maldovirus, Mulcrilevirus, Opunvirus, and Topilevirus. Archives of Virology, v.167, p. 695-710, 2022., 9494 Zerbini, F. M., Briddon, R. W., Idris, A., Martin, D. P., Moriones, E., Navas-Castillo, J., Rivera-Bustamante, R., Roumagnac, P., Varsani, A., & Ictv Report Consortium. ICTV Virus Taxonomy Profile: Geminiviridae. Journal of General Virology, v.98, p. 131-133, 2017.). In the establishment of infection in plants, the satellite molecules associated with begomoviruses also play an important role; these known subviral molecules are betasatellites, alphasatellites, deltasatellites or non-coding satellites (3131 Gupta N, Reddy K, Bhattacharyya D, Chakraborty S. Plant responses to geminivirus infection: guardians of the plant immunity. Journal of Virology. v.18, p. 143, 2021.). The introduction and blowout of begomoviruses and their vectors around the world provide threatening circumstances for the cultivation of vegetables and other economically significant crops, since tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) is widely known to have emerged as a serious concern for tomato production worldwide, and these viral diseases of vegetable crops have ultimately posed serious threat to food security (3939 ill U, Scott JW, Shekasteband R, Ogundiwin E, Schuit C, Francis DM, Sim SC, Smith H, Hutton SF. Ty-6, a major begomovirus resistance gene on chromosome 10, is effective against Tomato yellow leaf curl virus and Tomato mottle virus. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, v.132, p. 1543-1554, 2019., 3232 Hak, H. and Z. Spiegelman, The Tomato Brown Rugose Fruit Virus Movement Protein Overcomes Tm-2(2) Resistance in Tomato While Attenuating Viral Transport. Molecular Plant Microbe Interaction, v.34, p.1024-1032, 2021., 3333 Hanssen, I.M., M. Lapidot, and B.P. Thomma, Emerging viral diseases of tomato crops. Molecular Plant Microbe Interaction, v.23, p. 539-48, 2010.). Recombination and mutation have resulted in new variants, which are favored by climate changes, global agricultural trade, poor quarantine measures and cropping systems, and have increased their host range and geographic distribution around the globe, making their control more complex. Since the identification of begomoviruses as deadly plant pathogens, different methods have been adopted to control the disease or minimize the infection (33 Aimone, C. D., Lavington, E., Hoyer, J. S., Deppong, D. O., Mickelson-Young, L., Jacobson, A., Kennedy, G. G., Carbone, I., Hanley-Bowdoin, L., & Duffy, S. Population diversity of cassava mosaic begomoviruses increases over the course of serial vegetative propagation. Journal of General Virology, v.102, p. e001622, 2021., 88 Bai W, Chern M, Ruan D, Canlas PE, Sze-To WH, Ronald PC. Enhanced disease resistance and hypersensitivity to BTH by introduction of an NH1/OsNPR1 paralog. Journal of Plant Biotechnology, v.9, p.205-215, 2011., 1919 Corrales-Gutierrez, M., Medina-Puche, L., Yu, Y., Wang, L., Ding, X., Luna, A. P., Bejarano, E. R., Castillo, A. G., & Lozano-Duran, R. The C4 protein from the geminivirus Tomato yellow leaf curl virus confers drought tolerance in Arabidopsis through an ABA-independent mechanism. Plant Biotechnology Journal. v.18, p.1121-1123, 2020.).

Control strategies used against begomovirus infection

Managing begomoviruses is difficult on a global platform due to the high incidence of economically significant diseases caused by these viruses. Integrated pest management (IPM), which includes actions before, during and after the growing season, is the most efficient technique for management, regardless of the type of agricultural practices (7777 Rubio, L., L. Galipienso, and I. Ferriol, Detection of Plant Viruses and Disease Management: Relevance of Genetic Diversity and Evolution. Frontiers in Plant Sciences, v.11, p. 1092, 2020).

Cultural and phytosanitary practices

Every country is following some quarantine measures and has created special quarantine departments to stop the introduction of exotic pests (7979 Schrader, G. and J.-G. Unger, Plant Quarantine as a Measure Against Invasive Alien Species: The Framework of the International Plant Protection Convention and the plant health regulations in the European Union. Biological Invasions, 2003. V.5, p. 357-364.). The purpose of plant quarantine measures is to safeguard a country’s or a region’s agriculture against the potential effects of dangerous pathogens and pests (7979 Schrader, G. and J.-G. Unger, Plant Quarantine as a Measure Against Invasive Alien Species: The Framework of the International Plant Protection Convention and the plant health regulations in the European Union. Biological Invasions, 2003. V.5, p. 357-364.). These measures are especially crucial and pertinent for states whose economies are heavily focused on agriculture. In addition to reducing the threat posed by exotic pests, quarantine also aims to eradicate and stop the spread of pests and pathogens (both native and imported) with restricted dispersal within the territory or the country; this is known as domestic quarantine (5959 Macleod, Alan & Pautasso, Marco & Jeger, Mike & Haines-Young, Roy. Evolution of the international regulation of plant pest and challenges for future plant health. Food Security, v.2, p.49-70, 2010.). However, poor quarantine measures have resulted in the introduction of numerous devastating pests into new countries (9090 Waage, J.K. and J.D. Mumford, Agricultural biosecurity, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, v.363, p. 863-76, 2008.). The Irish Famine in the 1840s, which was brought on by Phytophthora infestants imported from Central America, is one example of introduced pest causing epidemic and pandemic with severe effects on food production, way of life, and environmental biodiversity. Banana bunchy top virus outbreak in the sub-region of West Africa due to the virus spread through planting material from sub-regions of Central Africa, as well as cassava mosaic disease invasion in East Asia caused by Sri Lankan cassava mosaic virus (SLCMV) which was introduced from South Asia, are two recent examples of devastating outbreaks caused by trans-boundary pest introductions (5050 Kumar PL, Cuervo M, Kreuze JF, Muller G, Kulkarni G, Kumari SG, Massart S, Mezzalama M, Alakonya A, Muchugi A, Graziosi I, Ndjiondjop MN, Sharma R, Negawo AT. Phytosanitary Interventions for Safe Global Germplasm Exchange and the Prevention of Transboundary Pest Spread: The Role of CGIAR Germplasm Health Units. Plants (Basel), v.10, p.328, 2021., 4343 Jones, R.A.C., Global Plant Virus Disease Pandemics and Epidemics. Plants (Basel), v.10, p.233, 2021.). Strong and strict quarantine measures can stop the introduction of pests, which can cause epidemics. This is the first step towards control strategies (4242 Jones, R.A., Plant virus emergence and evolution: origins, new encounter scenarios, factors driving emergence, effects of changing world conditions, and prospects for control. Virus Research, v.141, p.113-30, 2009). Over the years, weeds have become the reservoir of plant viruses (5151 kumar, S., M. Bhowmick, and P. Ray, Weeds as alternate and alternative hosts of crop pests. Indian Journal of Weed Science, v.53, p.14-29, 2021.). Cultural practices, including roguing, removal of alternative host plants, disposal of residues, rotation with unrelated and non-host crops, balanced fertilizer usage, deep burial of infected plants, and time of cropping (2424 El-Wakeil, N. and A.M.M. Abdallah, Cotton pests and the actual strategies for their management control. Cotton: Cultivation, Varieties and Uses, Egypt: Nova Science Publishers, Inc. 2012, v.1, chap.1, p.1-59.), can not only reduce the insect vector population, but also lower the disease pressure (4545 Karaye AK, Sabo BB, Chamo AM, Rabiu AM. Influence of agronomic practices on crop production. International journal of science: Basic and Applied research. v.31, 2017.). Physical barriers like UV-absorbing plastic sheets and fine mesh screens have been demonstrated to be helpful against whiteflies, but this method also causes issues with shadowing, overheating and inadequate ventilation, and is not such a common practice in underdeveloped countries (9191 Weintraub, P., Physical Control: An Important Tool in Pest Management Programs, In: Ishaaya, I., Horowitz, A. (eds) Bio rational Control of Arthropod Pests. Springer, Dordrecht. 2009. p. 317-324.). In rural areas of Pakistan, the farmers are not much educated about integrated pest management and are following the conventional mono-cropping methods. Mono-cropping and poor field sanitation have increased the insect pest population, and there is a dire need to stop these practices in underdeveloped countries (11 Abdul Rehman, Luan Jingdong, Babar Shahzad, Abbas Ali Chandio, Imran Hussain, Ghulam Nabi, Muhammad Shahid Iqbal. Economic perspectives of major field crops of Pakistan: An empirical study. Pacific Science Review B: Humanities and Social Sciences, v.1, p. 145-158, 2015., 5454 Litsinger, J.A., E.M. Libetario, and B.L. Canapi, Eliciting Farmer Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices in the Development of Integrated Pest Management Programs for Rice in Asia, in Integrated Pest Management: Dissemination and Impact: Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, 2009, v.2, chap.5, p. 119-273., 66 Amar Matloob, Muhammad Ehsan Safdar, Tasawer Abbas, Farhena Aslam, Abdul Khaliq, Asif Tanveer, Abdul Rehman, Asim Raza Chadhar. Challenges and prospects for weed management in Pakistan: A review. Crop Protection, v.134, p. e104724, 2020.).

Vector management through Insecticides

Begomoviruses are spread by whiteflies, and this small monster has wreaked havoc on agricultural crops all over the world where farming is practiced or possible (2525 Fiallo-Olivé, E. and J. Navas-Castillo, Molecular and Biological Characterization of a New World Mono-/Bipartite Begomovirus/Deltasatellite Complex Infecting Corchorus siliquosus. Frontiers in Microbiology, v.11, p.e1755 2020.). A traditional and hypothetically easier approach to control viral infection usually involves the interruption of transmission through vector control, which is led by the application of chemical insecticides/pesticides (6363 Mubarik MS, Khan SH, Ahmad A, Raza A, Khan Z, Sajjad M, Sammour RHA, Mustafa AEMA, Al-Ghamdi AA, Alajmi AH, Alshamasi FKI, Elshikh MS. Controlling Geminiviruses before Transmission: Prospects. Plants (Basel, Switzerland), v.9, p. 1556, 2020.). Pesticides are used to boost agricultural output; however, they accumulate over time in components of plant, soil, water, biota and remains suspended in the air. Pesticides contaminate the environment, reside in the crops and eventually invade the food chain, risking the human and animal health (8888 Tudi, M., Daniel Ruan, H., Wang, L., Lyu, J., Sadler, R., Connell, D., Chu, C., & Phung, D. T. Agriculture Development, Pesticide Application and Its Impact on the Environment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, v.18, p. 1112, 2021., 4141 Joko, Tri & Anggoro, Sutrisno & Sunoko, Henna & Rachmawati, Savitri. Pesticides Usage in the Soil Quality Degradation Potential in Wanasari Subdistrict, Brebes, Indonesia. Applied and Environmental Soil Science, v.2017 p. e5896191, 2017.). Around 2 million tons of agricultural-related chemicals are used worldwide, of which 17.5% are fungicides, 29.5% are insecticides, 47.5% are herbicides, and 5.5% are other pesticides. China, the United States, Argentina, Thailand, Brazil, Italy, France, Canada, Japan and India are the top ten pesticide-using countries on the planet (8383 Sharma, Anket & Kumar, Vinod & Shahzad, Babar & Tanveer, Mohsin & Sidhu, Gagan Preet Singh & Handa, Neha & Kohli, Sukhmeen & Yadav, Poonam & Bali, Aditi & Parihar, Ripu & Dar, Owias & Singh, Kirpal & Jasrotia, Shivam & Bakshi, Palak & M, Ramakrishnan & Kumar, Sandeep & Bhardwaj, Renu & Thukral, Ashwani. Worldwide pesticide usage and its impacts on ecosystem. SN Applied Sciences, v.1, p. 1446, 2019.). Judicious application of insecticides is essential (7676 Roy, S & Ali, Md Sahadat & Mony, F & Islam, Sirajul & Matin, Md. Chemical Control of Whitefly and Aphid Insect Pest of French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research, v.2, p. 69-75, 2014.), since a non-judicious and unnecessary use of pesticide has developed resistance in insect pests. Bemisia tabaci is the fifth most insecticide-resistant species in the world out of the top 12; therefore, the control of whitefly has become a global concern due to readily developing resistance against each new introduced insecticide (4646 Khalid MZ, Ahmed S, Al-Ashkar I, El Sabagh A, Liu L, Zhong G. Evaluation of Resistance Development in Bemisia tabaci Genn. (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) in Cotton against Different Insecticides. Insects, v.12, p.996, 2021.). Indiscriminate use of insecticides against whitefly can only be stopped by the proper and timely pest scouting. Pesticide usage causes serious consequences and this control significantly adds to the production costs, but chemical pesticide application is still chosen over all other options for preventing crop yield loss by farmers. (3737 Howard, R., Cultural control of plant diseases: A historical perspective. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, v.1996, p. 145-150, 2009.)

Development of resistant varieties

Development of plant resistant cultivars through breeding techniques is the inviting and cost-effective approach to prevent plant virus diseases (7777 Rubio, L., L. Galipienso, and I. Ferriol, Detection of Plant Viruses and Disease Management: Relevance of Genetic Diversity and Evolution. Frontiers in Plant Sciences, v.11, p. 1092, 2020). Conventional breeding has extensively used natural sources of resistance to generate virus-resistant plants (7474 Reddy DV, Sudarshana MR, Fuchs M, Rao NC, Thottappilly G. Genetically engineered virus-resistant plants in developing countries: current status and future prospects. Advances in Virus Research, v.75, p. 185-220, 2009.). Because this method does not require additional resources to control viral vectors, virus-resistant crops boost breeders’ profitability. The introduction of new geminivirus strains as a result of continuous recombination and changes in farming techniques is the only flaw and failure of this method (4040 ji, Xiang & Huawei, Zhang & Zhang, Yi & Wang, Yanpeng & Gao, Caixia. Establishing a CRISPR–Cas-like immune system conferring DNA virus resistance in plants. Nature Plants, v.1 p.15144, 2015., 4949 Kreuze, J.F. and J.P. Valkonen, Utilization of engineered resistance to viruses in crops of the developing world, with emphasis on sub-Saharan Africa. Current Opinion in Virology, v.26, p. 90-97, 2017.). Another problem is when two or more viruses co-infect a crop plant (2929 Garcia-Ruiz, H., WHEN VIRUSES INFECT PLANTS. Scientia (Bristol, England), v.123, p. 40-43, 2019.). When the vector is present in the field and the environmental conditions favor the disease development, there are chances that new resistance breaking viral strains emerge, since viruses change their genome through recombination and mutation under pressure and a new more destructive strain evolves (5353 Lima ATM, Silva JCF, Silva FN, Castillo-Urquiza GP, Silva FF, Seah YM, Mizubuti ESG, Duffy S, Zerbini FM. The diversification of begomovirus populations is predominantly driven by mutational dynamics. Virus Evolution, v.13, p. vex005-vex005, 2017., 5252 Lele Zhao, Mansha Seth Pasricha, Dragos Stemate, Alvin Crespo-Bellido, Jacqueline Gagnon, Siobain Duffy. Existing Host Range Mutations Constrain Further Emergence of RNA Viruses. Journal of Virology, v.93, p. e01385-18, 2019, 2020 Crespo-Bellido A, Hoyer JS, Dubey D, Jeannot RB, Duffy S. Interspecies Recombination Has Driven the Macroevolution of Cassava Mosaic Begomoviruses. Journal of Virology. v.95, p.e0054121, 2021.). In 1967, a village close to Multan, Pakistan, reported the first case of cotton leaf curl disease (CLCD) brought on by begomoviruses, but it kept unnoticed until early 1990s (7373 Rahman M, Khan AQ, Rahmat Z, Iqbal MA and Zafar Y. Genetics and Genomics of Cotton Leaf Curl Disease, Its Viral Causal Agents and Whitefly Vector: A Way Forward to Sustain Cotton Fiber Security. Frontiers in Plant Sciences, v.8, p. 1157, 2017.), when it became pandemic and caused financial losses of up to 5 billion USD to the Pakistan’ economy between 1992 and 1997 (1212 Briddon RW, Mansoor S, Bedford ID, Pinner MS, Saunders K, Stanley J, Zafar Y, Malik KA, Markham PG. Identification of DNA components required for induction of cotton leaf curl disease. Virology. v.285, p.234-243, 2001.). At that time, researchers in Pakistan focused on the development of resistant varieties of cotton, by breeding locally cultivated susceptible varieties with resistant sources; resistant cotton variants were developed, and the resistance in the recently released cotton cultivars held firm until the appearance of a Burewala viral strain in 2001 in Punjab District of Vehari. The newly developed resistance-breaking strain infected all resistant cotton cultivars. Cotton leaf curl Burewala virus (CLCuBuV) is the name of this strain, which has sequences of other two strains: Multan and Khokhran. So far, there is no resistant cotton variety available in Pakistan against Burewala strain (3535 Hassan, Feehan & Qayyum, Abdul & Malik, Waqas & Maqbool, Amir & Hassan, Muhammad & Rehman, Muhammad & Shoaib, Muhammad & Muhammad, Shehzad & Ahmad, Shoaib & Ahmad, Laraib & Arshad, Maham. Cotton Leaf Curl Virus (CLCuV) Disease in Pakistan: A Critical Review. Journal Of APPLIED SCIENCES AND BUSINESS ECONOMICS, v.3, 2015., 6565 Nawaz, Bilal & NAEEM, MUHAMMAD HAMMAD & Malik, Tanwir & Muhae ud Din, Ghulam & Ahmad, Qadeer & Sattar, Saira. A Review about Cotton Leaf Curl Viral Disease and Its Control Strategies in Pakistan. International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research, v.3, p.132-147, 2019.).

Cross Protection

Cross-protection is another disease management method that was defined more than 70 years ago for plant viruses. McKinney originally identified this method in 1926; numerous examples of cross-protection have been identified thereafter (2727 Folimonova, S.Y., Developing an understanding of cross-protection by Citrus tristeza virus. Frontiers in Microbiology, v.4, p.76, 2013.). According to this method, by injecting a mild isolate of a virus into a plant, the symptoms of the severe strain are inhibited or delayed in expression when the plant is subsequently inoculated with a severe isolate of the same virus (9595 Zhou C, Zhou Y. Strategies for viral cross protection in plants. Methods in Molecular Biology. v.894, p. 69-81, 2012.). Previously, it was believed that cross-protection could only be used to identify whether a plant virus belonged to the same strain or a different species. Another term used for cross-protection is “plant immunization” (6666 Nicaise, V., Crop immunity against viruses: outcomes and future challenges. Frontiers in Plant Sciences, v.5, p. 660-660, 2014.). Cross-protection entirely depends on a viral strain that causes either no symptoms or mild symptoms with low viral capacity, and this strain is called primary virus (5252 Lele Zhao, Mansha Seth Pasricha, Dragos Stemate, Alvin Crespo-Bellido, Jacqueline Gagnon, Siobain Duffy. Existing Host Range Mutations Constrain Further Emergence of RNA Viruses. Journal of Virology, v.93, p. e01385-18, 2019). The primary virus is classified as attenuated and therefore acts as a vaccine (6767 Nishiguchi, M. and K. Kobayashi, Attenuated plant viruses: Preventing virus diseases and understanding the molecular mechanism. Journal of General Plant Pathology, v.77, p. 221-229, 2011., 9696 Ziebell, H. and J.P. Carr, Cross-Protection: A Century of Mystery. Advances in Virus Research, v.76, p. 211-264, 2010.). Citrus tristeza virus, zucchini yellow mosaic virus, papaya ring-spot virus and tomato mosaic virus have all been successfully controlled by this method (8989 Vanderschuren, H., Alder, A., Zhang, P., & Gruissem, W. Dose-dependent RNAi-mediated geminivirus resistance in the tropical root crop cassava. Plant Molecular Biology, v.70, p. 265-272, 2009.). Early research revealed that severe strains of cassava mosaic disease (CMD) viruses might infect plants that were previously infected by moderate strains. Due to their poor disease-causing ability, primary viruses or strains cause no impacts on plants due to no or mild disease symptoms and therefore generate bearable yield losses (5454 Litsinger, J.A., E.M. Libetario, and B.L. Canapi, Eliciting Farmer Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices in the Development of Integrated Pest Management Programs for Rice in Asia, in Integrated Pest Management: Dissemination and Impact: Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, 2009, v.2, chap.5, p. 119-273., 2626 Folimonova, S.Y., D. Achor, and M. Bar-Joseph, Walking Together: Cross-Protection, Genome Conservation, and the Replication Machinery of Citrus tristeza virus. Viruses, v.12, p. 1353, 2020., 3434 HARRISON, B.D., ZHOU, X., OTIM-NAPE, G.W., LIU, Y. and ROBINSON, D.J, Role of a novel type of double infection in the geminivirus-induced epidemic of severe cassava mosaic in Uganda. Annals of Applied Biology. v. 131, p. 437-448, 1997.). As demonstrated by the managing of two important plant viruses, Citrus tristeza virus (CTV) or pepino mosaic virus (PepMV), cross-protection against plant viruses can be a very effective strategy. However, in order to use cross-protection against plant viruses, it is compulsory to assess mild strains that are similar to the severe strains. It may be sufficient to use cultural practices and keep insect vector populations at a minimum level to lessen the spread of pathogenic viruses; however, cultural practices are not sufficient to lower the disease incidence (7272 Pechinger K, Chooi KM, MacDiarmid RM, Harper SJ, Ziebell H. A New Era for Mild Strain Cross-Protection. Viruses, v.11, p. 670, 2019.). There are several drawbacks to using the cross-protection technique. Transmission to a new and different host, mixed infections with other viruses, mutation or recombination between different strains or viruses, and even a more serious disease can result from infection by the mild strain (2828 Fulton, R.W., Practices and Precautions in the Use of Cross Protection for Plant Virus Disease Control. Annual Reviews of Phytopathology, v.24, p.67-81, 1986.). As a result, cross-protection should be employed only after other protective measures have failed, and the procedure should be constantly monitored (1515 Carolan, Kevin, Joe Helps, Femke van den Berg, Ruairidh Bain, Neil Paveley, and Frank van den Bosch. “Extending the durability of cultivar resistance by limiting epidemic growth rates. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 284, no. 1863, 2017.).

Resistance through RNAi

Gene silencing is described as the epigenetic process used to regulate the genes; it can be transcriptional or post-transcriptional (2323 El-Sappah AH, Yan K, Huang Q, Islam MM, Li Q, Wang Y, Khan MS, Zhao X, Mir RR, Li J, El-Tarabily KA, Abbas M. Comprehensive Mechanism of Gene Silencing and Its Role in Plant Growth and Development. Frontiers in Plant Sciences. v.12, p. e705249, 2021.). The mechanism of RNA silencing was first observed in tobacco plants in 1928 by Wingyard when he observed the discovery of new leaves from tobacco ring spot viral infection (3636 Herr, A.J. and D.C. Baulcombe, RNA silencing pathways in plants. Cold Spring Harb Symposia on Quantitative Biology, v.69, p.363-70, 2004., 99 Baulcombe, D., RNA silencing in plants. Nature, v.431, p.356-363, 2004.) but, at that time, the mechanism was unknown. In 1989, it was again found in Nicotiana benthamiana (2222 Eamens A, Wang MB, Smith NA, Waterhouse PM. RNA Silencing in Plants: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow. Plant Physiology, v.147, p.456-468, 2008.). In 1990, Napoli and Jorgensen reported gene silencing in petunia (8080 Sen, G.L. and H.M. Blau, A brief history of RNAi: the silence of the genes. FASEB Journal, v.20, p. 1293-1299, 2006.). Post-transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS) or RNA interference (RNAi) involves cutting of double-stranded ribonucleic acid (dsRNA) strands, when recognized by the plant defense mechanism, into small strands of approximately 21-26 nucleotides. The dsRNA is cut by dicer protein into short interfering RNA. Then, the dsRNA is unwound to make single-stranded ribonucleic acid (ssRNA) molecules and are known as small interference RNA (siRNA). The siRNA interrelates with RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). Whenever RISC finds a complementary strand to its associated siRNA, it binds to it and the dicer cleaves the dsRNA, thus preventing gene expression (77 Auer, C. and R. Frederick, Crop improvement using small RNAs: applications and predictive ecological risk assessments. Trends in Biotechnology, v.27, p.644-651, 2009., 9393 Younis A, Siddique MI, Kim CK, Lim KB. RNA Interference (RNAi) Induced Gene Silencing: A Promising Approach of Hi-Tech Plant Breeding. International Journal of Biological Sciences, v.10, p. 1150-1158, 2014). RNA interference is actually a naturally occurring mechanism to regulate transposons and other endogenous genes, as well as to counteract the invading genes (2121 Dash, S.K., K. Sushil, and H. Malik, RNA Interference A fine tuner of gene regulation: a Review. International Journal of Biotechnology and Molecular Biology Research, v.6, p. 35-39, 2015., 6060 Martínez de Alba, A.E., E. Elvira-Matelot, and H. Vaucheret, Gene silencing in plants: A diversity of pathways. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms, v.1829, p. 1300-1308, 2013.). Nowadays, it has been used by scientists to study functional genomics and to develop improved crop plants and disease resistant plants (6161 McGinnis, K.M., RNAi for functional genomics in plants. Briefings in Functional Genomics, v.9, p. 111-117, 2010.). Against geminiviruses, RNAi has been adopted to develop resistance to cotton leaf curl Multan virus (CLCuMV) in cotton (6464 Mubin M, Hussain M, Briddon RW, Mansoor S. Selection of target sequences as well as sequence identity determine the outcome of RNAi approach for resistance against cotton leaf curl geminivirus complex. Virology Journal, v.8, p. 122, 2011.), African cassava mosaic virus (ACMV) in cassava (7070 OWOR, B., LEGG, J.P., OKAO-OKUJA, G., OBONYO, R. and OGENGA-LATIGO, M.W. The effect of cassava mosaic geminiviruses on symptom severity, growth and root yield of a cassava mosaic virus disease-susceptible cultivar in Uganda. Annals of Applied Biology, v.143, p. 331-337, 2004.), cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) in tomato (6868 Ntui, Valentine & Kong, Kynet & Azadi, Pejman & Khan, Raham & Chin, Dong & Igawa, Tomoko & Mii, Masahiro & Nakamura, Ikuo. RNAi-Mediated Resistance to Cucumber Mosaic Virus (CMV) in Genetically Engineered Tomato. American Journal of Plant Sciences, v.5, p. 554-572, 2014.), rice dwarf virus (8585 Shimizu, T., Yoshii, M., Wei, T., Hirochika, H., & Omura, T. Silencing by RNAi of the gene for Pns12, a viroplasm matrix protein of Rice dwarf virus, results in strong resistance of transgenic rice plants to the virus. Plant Biotechnology Journal ,v.7, p. 24-32, 2008.) and cotton leaf curl Multan virus-Rajasthan strain (CLCuMV-Raj) in elite Indian cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) (4848 Khatoon S, Kumar A, Sarin NB, Khan JA. RNAi-mediated resistance against Cotton leaf curl disease in elite Indian cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) cultivar Narasimha. Virus Genes, v.52, p.530-537, 2016.), bean golden mosaic virus in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) (1111 Bonfim K, Faria JC, Nogueira EO, Mendes EA, Aragão FJ. RNAi-mediated resistance to Bean golden mosaic virus in genetically engineered common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Molecular Plant Microbe Interaction. v.20, p.717-726, 2007.), chili leaf curl virus Pakistan isolate Varanasi, and tomato leaf curl New Delhi virus-isolate chili and chili leaf curl Vellanad virus tested in Nicotiana benthamiana (8484 Sharma, V.K., S. Basu, and S. Chakraborty, RNAi mediated broad-spectrum transgenic resistance in Nicotiana benthamiana to chilli-infecting begomoviruses. Plant Cell Reports, v.34, p. 1389-1399, 2015.).

Host plant resistance

A more effective option to manage diseases, particularly those that are primarily introduced by geminiviruses largely over a specific length of time, is the host plant resistance phenomenon (44 Ali Z, Ali S, Tashkandi M, Zaidi SS, Mahfouz MM. CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Immunity to Geminiviruses: Differential Interference and Evasion. Scientific Reports, v.26, p.26912, 2016.). Resistance (R) genes are often involved in triggering downstream signaling response during plant disease resistance. Based on structural motifs, leucine-rich repeat domains, coiled-coil domains, interleukin-1 receptor domains, transmembrane regions and nucleotide-binding site resistant proteins can be divided into various super-families. Generally, nucleotide-binding site leucine-rich repeat (NBS-LRR) genes are the two most dominant R-genes found in plants; these two R-genes are further sub-grouped based on N-terminal coiled coil or toll/interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) domain (1717 Chen JY, Huang JQ, Li NY, Ma XF, Wang JL, Liu C, Liu YF, Liang Y, Bao YM, Dai XF. Genome-wide analysis of the gene families of resistance gene analogues in cotton and their response to Verticillium wilt. BMC Plant Biology, v.15, p.148, 2015.). Plants use a variety of defense mechanisms against pathogenic attacks. A defense response known as systemic acquired resistance (SAR) stimulates a hypersensitive system to an avirulent pathogen, which exhibits a normal part of plant resistance to virulent pathogens. The SAR is considered to be responsible for the activation of various related genes such as non-expressor of pathogenesis-related genes 1 (NPR1) and its paralogues NPR3 and NPR4. Exogenous application of certain chemicals to the plant, such as salicylic acid (SA), 2,6-dichloroisonicotinic acid and benzo 1,2,3 thiadiazole-7-carbothioic acid S-methyl ester, stimulates the SAR; in the signal transduction pathway(s), coupling the hypersensitive response (HR) with the onset of SAR endogenously produces SA after some hyper response (1313 Cao H, Glazebrook J, Clarke JD, Volko S, Dong X. The Arabidopsis NPR1 gene that controls systemic acquired resistance encodes a novel protein containing ankyrin repeats. Cell. v.88, p.57-63, 1997.). The SA-signaling pathway is considered an important system that requires the plant for immunity against the pathogen (3838 Huang, S., X. Zhang, and W.G.D. Fernando, Directing Trophic Divergence in Plant-Pathogen Interactions: Antagonistic Phytohormones With NO Doubt? Frontiers in Plant Sciences, v.11, p. e600063, 2020., 3030 Glazebrook, J., Contrasting mechanisms of defense against biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens. Annual Reviews of Phytopathology, v.43, p. 205-27, 2005.). The NPR1 and its paralogues (NPR3 and NPR4) are bona fide SA receptors that play a vital role in local and systemic immunity for SA-mediated regulation (1010 Birkenbihl, R.P., S. Liu, and I.E. Somssich, Transcriptional events defining plant immune responses. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, v.38, p.1-9, 2017.). Plants are very complex in nature and have effective innate immune systems to combat bacteria, fungi, viruses, etc. Characterization of the SAR mechanism especially depends on the induction of pathogenesis-related gene bundle, SA accumulation, and long-term resistance properties against plant diseases. Due to the long-term resistant property of SAR, AtNPR1 has been used as a resistance engineering tool in most agronomic crops against bacterial, fungal and viral attacks. Overexpression of BjNPR1 in Brassica juncea increased immunity against fungal pathogens like Alternaria brassicae and Erysiphe cruciferarum (55 Ali, S., Mir, Z. A., Tyagi, A., Mehari, H., Meena, R. P., Bhat, J. A., Yadav, P., Papalou, P., Rawat, S., & Grover, A. Overexpression of NPR1 in Brassica juncea Confers Broad Spectrum Resistance to Fungal Pathogens. Frontiers in plant science, v.8, p.1693, 2017.), while overexpression of MuNPR1 (of Mulberry) in Arabidopsis displayed increased resistance against Pseudomonas syringae PV. tomato DC3000 (PstDC3000) (9292 Xu, Y. Q., Wang, H., Qin, R. L., Fang, L. J., Liu, Z., Yuan, S. S., Gai, Y. P., & Ji, X. L. Characterization of NPR1 and NPR4 genes from mulberry (Morus multicaulis) and their roles in development and stress resistance. Physiologia Plantarum, v.167, p. 302-316, 2019.). In a similar pattern, knockdown of tomato NPR1-like gene (1818 Chen, Y. Y., Lin, Y. M., Chao, T. C., Wang, J. F., Liu, A. C., Ho, F. I., & Cheng, C. P. Virus-induced gene silencing reveals the involvement of ethylene-, salicylic acid- and mitogen-activated protein kinase-related defense pathways in the resistance of tomato to bacterial wilt. Physiologia Plantarum, v.136, p324-335, 2009.), tobacco NtNPR1 (5656 Liu Y, Schiff M, Marathe R, Dinesh-Kumar SP. Tobacco Rar1, EDS1 and NPR1/NIM1 like genes are required for N-mediated resistance to tobacco mosaic virus. The Plant Journal, v.30, p. 415-429, 2002.), and barley HvNPR1 (7878 Sanjukta Dey, Marion Wenig, Gregor Langen, Sapna Sharma, Karl G. Kugler, Claudia Knappe, Bettina Hause, Marlies Bichlmeier, Valiollah Babaeizad, Jafargholi Imani, Ingar Janzik, Thomas Stempfl, Ralph Hückelhoven, Karl-Heinz Kogel, Klaus F.X. Mayer, A. Corina Vlot, Bacteria-Triggered Systemic Immunity in Barley Is Associated with WRKY and ETHYLENE RESPONSIVE FACTORs but Not with Salicylic Acid. Plant Physiology, v.166, p.2133–2151. 2014., 5858 Luo MC, Gu YQ, Puiu D, Wang H, Twardziok SO, Deal KR, Huo N, Zhu T, Wang L, Wang Y, McGuire PE, Liu S, Long H, Ramasamy RK, Rodriguez JC, Van SL, Yuan L, Wang Z, Xia Z, Xiao L, Anderson OD, Ouyang S, Liang Y, Zimin AV, Pertea G, Qi P, Bennetzen JL, Dai X, Dawson MW, Müller HG, Kugler K, Rivarola-Duarte L, Spannagl M, Mayer KFX, Lu FH, Bevan MW, Leroy P, Li P, You FM, Sun Q, Liu Z, Lyons E, Wicker T, Salzberg SL, Devos KM, Dvořák J. Genome sequence of the progenitor of the wheat D genome Aegilops tauschii. Nature, v.551, p.498-502, 2017.) showed a hike in susceptibility to Ralstonia solanacearum, tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) and powdery mildew fungus, respectively. Two interrelated branches constitute the plant innate immunity: PTI, or pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP)-triggered immunity, is initiated when the pattern recognition receptor (PRR), present on the plant surface, recognizes the molecular signs of pathogens and a signal is mediated and further triggered downstream to mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase cascades and defense genes; and ETI, or effector-triggered immunity, is initiated when the plant disease resistance proteins (major R gene products) directly or indirectly recognize specific pathogen-derived effectors. Both PTI and ETI activate the SAR and are controlled by phytohormones, especially jasmonic acid (JA) and SA (7171 Pandey, S.P. and I.E. Somssich, The role of WRKY transcription factors in plant immunity. Plant Physiology, v.150, p.1648-55, 2009.). The pathogen-inducible transcription factor CaWRKY2 is known to have a role in early defense responses to biotic and abiotic stresses in chili pepper (6969 Oh SK, Yi SY, Yu SH, Moon JS, Park JM, Choi D. CaWRKY2, a chili pepper transcription factor, is rapidly induced by incompatible plant pathogens. Molecules and Cells, v.22, p. 58-64, 2006.).

CRISPER/Cas9

A holistic genome-editing approach, well known as clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats and CRISPR associated protein 9 (CRISPR/Cas9), is the most adaptable and defined method currently used to produce virus-resistant cultivars. CRISPR/Cas9 was initially found to be an adaptive immune defense mechanism in bacterial cells to protect against invading DNA (8686 Talakayala, A., S. Ankanagari, and M. Garladinne, CRISPR-Cas genome editing system: A versatile tool for developing disease resistant crops. Plant Stress, v.3, p. e100056, 2022.). Due to its fascinating features, the Cas9 genome editing system has developed into a versatile method to achieve specific gene targeting, gene replacements, gene insertions/deletions, and single base-pair alterations. As a result, this tool has become a crucial component of contemporary plant breeding (8282 Shahriar SA, Islam MN, Chun CNW, Rahim MA, Paul NC, Uddain J, Siddiquee S. Control of Plant Viral Diseases by CRISPR/Cas9: Resistance Mechanisms, Strategies and Challenges in Food Crops. Plants, v.10, p.1264, 2021.). Cas9 technique has advanced the plant breeding programs and has made resistant cultivars possible even with transmissible resistance against plant viruses. This system includes the complex of Cas9 endonuclease and single-guide RNAs (sgRNAs), which target specific parts of the virus or plant genome sequence by either interposing the cleavage of viral sequence or altering the plant genome, meanwhile they reduce the replication ability of the virus. This technique can act in two ways: it can detect and degrade pathogenic genes of viruses, making them less virulent or non-virulent, or it can be used to develop crops with resistance genes against viruses. Therefore, this approach has created a buzz in reforming the research against viruses due to its sequence-specific nuclease proficiency (8282 Shahriar SA, Islam MN, Chun CNW, Rahim MA, Paul NC, Uddain J, Siddiquee S. Control of Plant Viral Diseases by CRISPR/Cas9: Resistance Mechanisms, Strategies and Challenges in Food Crops. Plants, v.10, p.1264, 2021., 5555 Liu H, Soyars CL, Li J, Fei Q, He G, Peterson BA, Meyers BC, Nimchuk ZL, Wang X. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated resistance to cauliflower mosaic virus. Plant Direct, v.2, p. e00047, 2018., 4747 Khan, Z.A., R. Kumar, and I. Dasgupta, CRISPR/Cas-Mediated Resistance against Viruses in Plants. International Journal of Molecular Science, v.23, p.2303, 2022.). CRISPR-Cas9 system has been engineered to confer resistance to various human viruses and plant geminiviruses (9191 Weintraub, P., Physical Control: An Important Tool in Pest Management Programs, In: Ishaaya, I., Horowitz, A. (eds) Bio rational Control of Arthropod Pests. Springer, Dordrecht. 2009. p. 317-324.). The bean yellow dwarf virus (BeYDV) and the beet severe curled top virus (BSCTV) were targeted in the first experiment using CRISPR to develop viral resistance in N. benthamiana and A. thaliana (44 Ali Z, Ali S, Tashkandi M, Zaidi SS, Mahfouz MM. CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Immunity to Geminiviruses: Differential Interference and Evasion. Scientific Reports, v.26, p.26912, 2016.). The highest level of resistance to leaf curl disease and decreased viral infections are demonstrated by transgenic tobacco plants that produce dual gRNAs targeting the C1 (Replication-associated protein) and IR sections of cotton leaf curl Multan virus (CLCuMuV) (9393 Younis A, Siddique MI, Kim CK, Lim KB. RNA Interference (RNAi) Induced Gene Silencing: A Promising Approach of Hi-Tech Plant Breeding. International Journal of Biological Sciences, v.10, p. 1150-1158, 2014). Targeting numerous regions of the viral genome at the same time would prevent the virus from using the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) repair pathway; then, cleaved molecules would eventually be tainted. A catalytically inactive Cas9 would be predicted to stop viral replication and eventually result in viral interference if it were to target an intergenic region that is essential for binding and replication start. However, while developing CRISPR/Cas9-based approaches for long-term viral interference and resistance, leading to higher agricultural production, there are several crucial considerations to take into account (9393 Younis A, Siddique MI, Kim CK, Lim KB. RNA Interference (RNAi) Induced Gene Silencing: A Promising Approach of Hi-Tech Plant Breeding. International Journal of Biological Sciences, v.10, p. 1150-1158, 2014, 4444 Kalinina NO, Khromov A, Love AJ, Taliansky ME. CRISPR Applications in Plant Virology: Virus Resistance and Beyond. Phytopathology, v.110, p.18-28, 2019., 4040 ji, Xiang & Huawei, Zhang & Zhang, Yi & Wang, Yanpeng & Gao, Caixia. Establishing a CRISPR–Cas-like immune system conferring DNA virus resistance in plants. Nature Plants, v.1 p.15144, 2015., 1414 Cao Y, Zhou H, Zhou X, Li F. Control of Plant Viruses by CRISPR/Cas System-Mediated Adaptive Immunity. Frontiers in Microbiology. v.11, p.593700, 2020.).

Conclusion

Controlling and managing begomovirus infections has become difficult due to the dynamic and rapid evolution of new viral strains. Several researches have contributed significantly to the development of resistant plants through the expression of viral and non-viral proteins, host-resistant (R) genes, and gene silencing by RNA interference against begomoviruses, but different researchers keep finding ways and discovering pathways to better understand and manage plant-virus interactions. In the previous years, RNAi technique was considered the best method for resistance against begomoviruses of the cotton crop; however, cotton leaf curl in Pakistan still prevails and causes losses every year. All control strategies discovered so far, when applied against begomoviruses, create pressure on the viral genome, and this survival pressure changes the viral genome to appear as strong as before to break this pressure. Burewala strain of cotton leaf curl virus is a clear example of this mechanism. Due to recombination and mutation, begomoviruses have been changing their genome and spreading as new strains and becoming more devastating by infecting new plants and breaking host resistance. The present review suggests adopting a method that does not create conditions for the virus to undergo recombination and mutation or emerge as a more devastating strain; however, the host should have enough strength to tolerate the disease. Natural defense is a more economical and environment-friendly method, since it does not create any pressure on the virus. There are numerous insights in the plant genomes that are still hidden from the eye of the researcher and need to be explored before begomoviruses take over the agriculture of the world. The current study aimed to provide a comprehensive comparison among all control methods used all over the world to control begomovirus infection; despite all control methods, the viruses continue spreading, still uncontrolled, and agriculture is still threatened, which has arisen a question for researchers: is the best strategy against begomoviruses yet to come?

REFERÊNCIAS

  • 1
    Abdul Rehman, Luan Jingdong, Babar Shahzad, Abbas Ali Chandio, Imran Hussain, Ghulam Nabi, Muhammad Shahid Iqbal. Economic perspectives of major field crops of Pakistan: An empirical study. Pacific Science Review B: Humanities and Social Sciences, v.1, p. 145-158, 2015.
  • 2
    Agarwal G, Kavalappara SR, Gautam S, Silva AD, Simmons A, Srinivasan R, Dutta B. Field Screen and Genotyping of Phaseolus vulgaris against Two Begomoviruses in Georgia, USA. Insects, v.12, p.49, 2021.
  • 3
    Aimone, C. D., Lavington, E., Hoyer, J. S., Deppong, D. O., Mickelson-Young, L., Jacobson, A., Kennedy, G. G., Carbone, I., Hanley-Bowdoin, L., & Duffy, S. Population diversity of cassava mosaic begomoviruses increases over the course of serial vegetative propagation. Journal of General Virology, v.102, p. e001622, 2021.
  • 4
    Ali Z, Ali S, Tashkandi M, Zaidi SS, Mahfouz MM. CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Immunity to Geminiviruses: Differential Interference and Evasion. Scientific Reports, v.26, p.26912, 2016.
  • 5
    Ali, S., Mir, Z. A., Tyagi, A., Mehari, H., Meena, R. P., Bhat, J. A., Yadav, P., Papalou, P., Rawat, S., & Grover, A. Overexpression of NPR1 in Brassica juncea Confers Broad Spectrum Resistance to Fungal Pathogens. Frontiers in plant science, v.8, p.1693, 2017.
  • 6
    Amar Matloob, Muhammad Ehsan Safdar, Tasawer Abbas, Farhena Aslam, Abdul Khaliq, Asif Tanveer, Abdul Rehman, Asim Raza Chadhar. Challenges and prospects for weed management in Pakistan: A review. Crop Protection, v.134, p. e104724, 2020.
  • 7
    Auer, C. and R. Frederick, Crop improvement using small RNAs: applications and predictive ecological risk assessments. Trends in Biotechnology, v.27, p.644-651, 2009.
  • 8
    Bai W, Chern M, Ruan D, Canlas PE, Sze-To WH, Ronald PC. Enhanced disease resistance and hypersensitivity to BTH by introduction of an NH1/OsNPR1 paralog. Journal of Plant Biotechnology, v.9, p.205-215, 2011.
  • 9
    Baulcombe, D., RNA silencing in plants. Nature, v.431, p.356-363, 2004.
  • 10
    Birkenbihl, R.P., S. Liu, and I.E. Somssich, Transcriptional events defining plant immune responses. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, v.38, p.1-9, 2017.
  • 11
    Bonfim K, Faria JC, Nogueira EO, Mendes EA, Aragão FJ. RNAi-mediated resistance to Bean golden mosaic virus in genetically engineered common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Molecular Plant Microbe Interaction. v.20, p.717-726, 2007.
  • 12
    Briddon RW, Mansoor S, Bedford ID, Pinner MS, Saunders K, Stanley J, Zafar Y, Malik KA, Markham PG. Identification of DNA components required for induction of cotton leaf curl disease. Virology. v.285, p.234-243, 2001.
  • 13
    Cao H, Glazebrook J, Clarke JD, Volko S, Dong X. The Arabidopsis NPR1 gene that controls systemic acquired resistance encodes a novel protein containing ankyrin repeats. Cell. v.88, p.57-63, 1997.
  • 14
    Cao Y, Zhou H, Zhou X, Li F. Control of Plant Viruses by CRISPR/Cas System-Mediated Adaptive Immunity. Frontiers in Microbiology. v.11, p.593700, 2020.
  • 15
    Carolan, Kevin, Joe Helps, Femke van den Berg, Ruairidh Bain, Neil Paveley, and Frank van den Bosch. “Extending the durability of cultivar resistance by limiting epidemic growth rates. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 284, no. 1863, 2017.
  • 16
    Castonguay, S., Creating an agricultural world order: regional plant protection problems and international phytopathology, 1878-1939. Agricultural History, v.84, p.46-73, 2010.
  • 17
    Chen JY, Huang JQ, Li NY, Ma XF, Wang JL, Liu C, Liu YF, Liang Y, Bao YM, Dai XF. Genome-wide analysis of the gene families of resistance gene analogues in cotton and their response to Verticillium wilt. BMC Plant Biology, v.15, p.148, 2015.
  • 18
    Chen, Y. Y., Lin, Y. M., Chao, T. C., Wang, J. F., Liu, A. C., Ho, F. I., & Cheng, C. P. Virus-induced gene silencing reveals the involvement of ethylene-, salicylic acid- and mitogen-activated protein kinase-related defense pathways in the resistance of tomato to bacterial wilt. Physiologia Plantarum, v.136, p324-335, 2009.
  • 19
    Corrales-Gutierrez, M., Medina-Puche, L., Yu, Y., Wang, L., Ding, X., Luna, A. P., Bejarano, E. R., Castillo, A. G., & Lozano-Duran, R. The C4 protein from the geminivirus Tomato yellow leaf curl virus confers drought tolerance in Arabidopsis through an ABA-independent mechanism. Plant Biotechnology Journal. v.18, p.1121-1123, 2020.
  • 20
    Crespo-Bellido A, Hoyer JS, Dubey D, Jeannot RB, Duffy S. Interspecies Recombination Has Driven the Macroevolution of Cassava Mosaic Begomoviruses. Journal of Virology. v.95, p.e0054121, 2021.
  • 21
    Dash, S.K., K. Sushil, and H. Malik, RNA Interference A fine tuner of gene regulation: a Review. International Journal of Biotechnology and Molecular Biology Research, v.6, p. 35-39, 2015.
  • 22
    Eamens A, Wang MB, Smith NA, Waterhouse PM. RNA Silencing in Plants: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow. Plant Physiology, v.147, p.456-468, 2008.
  • 23
    El-Sappah AH, Yan K, Huang Q, Islam MM, Li Q, Wang Y, Khan MS, Zhao X, Mir RR, Li J, El-Tarabily KA, Abbas M. Comprehensive Mechanism of Gene Silencing and Its Role in Plant Growth and Development. Frontiers in Plant Sciences. v.12, p. e705249, 2021.
  • 24
    El-Wakeil, N. and A.M.M. Abdallah, Cotton pests and the actual strategies for their management control. Cotton: Cultivation, Varieties and Uses, Egypt: Nova Science Publishers, Inc. 2012, v.1, chap.1, p.1-59.
  • 25
    Fiallo-Olivé, E. and J. Navas-Castillo, Molecular and Biological Characterization of a New World Mono-/Bipartite Begomovirus/Deltasatellite Complex Infecting Corchorus siliquosus. Frontiers in Microbiology, v.11, p.e1755 2020.
  • 26
    Folimonova, S.Y., D. Achor, and M. Bar-Joseph, Walking Together: Cross-Protection, Genome Conservation, and the Replication Machinery of Citrus tristeza virus. Viruses, v.12, p. 1353, 2020.
  • 27
    Folimonova, S.Y., Developing an understanding of cross-protection by Citrus tristeza virus. Frontiers in Microbiology, v.4, p.76, 2013.
  • 28
    Fulton, R.W., Practices and Precautions in the Use of Cross Protection for Plant Virus Disease Control. Annual Reviews of Phytopathology, v.24, p.67-81, 1986.
  • 29
    Garcia-Ruiz, H., WHEN VIRUSES INFECT PLANTS. Scientia (Bristol, England), v.123, p. 40-43, 2019.
  • 30
    Glazebrook, J., Contrasting mechanisms of defense against biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens. Annual Reviews of Phytopathology, v.43, p. 205-27, 2005.
  • 31
    Gupta N, Reddy K, Bhattacharyya D, Chakraborty S. Plant responses to geminivirus infection: guardians of the plant immunity. Journal of Virology. v.18, p. 143, 2021.
  • 32
    Hak, H. and Z. Spiegelman, The Tomato Brown Rugose Fruit Virus Movement Protein Overcomes Tm-2(2) Resistance in Tomato While Attenuating Viral Transport. Molecular Plant Microbe Interaction, v.34, p.1024-1032, 2021.
  • 33
    Hanssen, I.M., M. Lapidot, and B.P. Thomma, Emerging viral diseases of tomato crops. Molecular Plant Microbe Interaction, v.23, p. 539-48, 2010.
  • 34
    HARRISON, B.D., ZHOU, X., OTIM-NAPE, G.W., LIU, Y. and ROBINSON, D.J, Role of a novel type of double infection in the geminivirus-induced epidemic of severe cassava mosaic in Uganda. Annals of Applied Biology. v. 131, p. 437-448, 1997.
  • 35
    Hassan, Feehan & Qayyum, Abdul & Malik, Waqas & Maqbool, Amir & Hassan, Muhammad & Rehman, Muhammad & Shoaib, Muhammad & Muhammad, Shehzad & Ahmad, Shoaib & Ahmad, Laraib & Arshad, Maham. Cotton Leaf Curl Virus (CLCuV) Disease in Pakistan: A Critical Review. Journal Of APPLIED SCIENCES AND BUSINESS ECONOMICS, v.3, 2015.
  • 36
    Herr, A.J. and D.C. Baulcombe, RNA silencing pathways in plants. Cold Spring Harb Symposia on Quantitative Biology, v.69, p.363-70, 2004.
  • 37
    Howard, R., Cultural control of plant diseases: A historical perspective. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, v.1996, p. 145-150, 2009.
  • 38
    Huang, S., X. Zhang, and W.G.D. Fernando, Directing Trophic Divergence in Plant-Pathogen Interactions: Antagonistic Phytohormones With NO Doubt? Frontiers in Plant Sciences, v.11, p. e600063, 2020.
  • 39
    ill U, Scott JW, Shekasteband R, Ogundiwin E, Schuit C, Francis DM, Sim SC, Smith H, Hutton SF. Ty-6, a major begomovirus resistance gene on chromosome 10, is effective against Tomato yellow leaf curl virus and Tomato mottle virus. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, v.132, p. 1543-1554, 2019.
  • 40
    ji, Xiang & Huawei, Zhang & Zhang, Yi & Wang, Yanpeng & Gao, Caixia. Establishing a CRISPR–Cas-like immune system conferring DNA virus resistance in plants. Nature Plants, v.1 p.15144, 2015.
  • 41
    Joko, Tri & Anggoro, Sutrisno & Sunoko, Henna & Rachmawati, Savitri. Pesticides Usage in the Soil Quality Degradation Potential in Wanasari Subdistrict, Brebes, Indonesia. Applied and Environmental Soil Science, v.2017 p. e5896191, 2017.
  • 42
    Jones, R.A., Plant virus emergence and evolution: origins, new encounter scenarios, factors driving emergence, effects of changing world conditions, and prospects for control. Virus Research, v.141, p.113-30, 2009
  • 43
    Jones, R.A.C., Global Plant Virus Disease Pandemics and Epidemics. Plants (Basel), v.10, p.233, 2021.
  • 44
    Kalinina NO, Khromov A, Love AJ, Taliansky ME. CRISPR Applications in Plant Virology: Virus Resistance and Beyond. Phytopathology, v.110, p.18-28, 2019.
  • 45
    Karaye AK, Sabo BB, Chamo AM, Rabiu AM. Influence of agronomic practices on crop production. International journal of science: Basic and Applied research. v.31, 2017.
  • 46
    Khalid MZ, Ahmed S, Al-Ashkar I, El Sabagh A, Liu L, Zhong G. Evaluation of Resistance Development in Bemisia tabaci Genn. (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) in Cotton against Different Insecticides. Insects, v.12, p.996, 2021.
  • 47
    Khan, Z.A., R. Kumar, and I. Dasgupta, CRISPR/Cas-Mediated Resistance against Viruses in Plants. International Journal of Molecular Science, v.23, p.2303, 2022.
  • 48
    Khatoon S, Kumar A, Sarin NB, Khan JA. RNAi-mediated resistance against Cotton leaf curl disease in elite Indian cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) cultivar Narasimha. Virus Genes, v.52, p.530-537, 2016.
  • 49
    Kreuze, J.F. and J.P. Valkonen, Utilization of engineered resistance to viruses in crops of the developing world, with emphasis on sub-Saharan Africa. Current Opinion in Virology, v.26, p. 90-97, 2017.
  • 50
    Kumar PL, Cuervo M, Kreuze JF, Muller G, Kulkarni G, Kumari SG, Massart S, Mezzalama M, Alakonya A, Muchugi A, Graziosi I, Ndjiondjop MN, Sharma R, Negawo AT. Phytosanitary Interventions for Safe Global Germplasm Exchange and the Prevention of Transboundary Pest Spread: The Role of CGIAR Germplasm Health Units. Plants (Basel), v.10, p.328, 2021.
  • 51
    kumar, S., M. Bhowmick, and P. Ray, Weeds as alternate and alternative hosts of crop pests. Indian Journal of Weed Science, v.53, p.14-29, 2021.
  • 52
    Lele Zhao, Mansha Seth Pasricha, Dragos Stemate, Alvin Crespo-Bellido, Jacqueline Gagnon, Siobain Duffy. Existing Host Range Mutations Constrain Further Emergence of RNA Viruses. Journal of Virology, v.93, p. e01385-18, 2019
  • 53
    Lima ATM, Silva JCF, Silva FN, Castillo-Urquiza GP, Silva FF, Seah YM, Mizubuti ESG, Duffy S, Zerbini FM. The diversification of begomovirus populations is predominantly driven by mutational dynamics. Virus Evolution, v.13, p. vex005-vex005, 2017.
  • 54
    Litsinger, J.A., E.M. Libetario, and B.L. Canapi, Eliciting Farmer Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices in the Development of Integrated Pest Management Programs for Rice in Asia, in Integrated Pest Management: Dissemination and Impact: Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, 2009, v.2, chap.5, p. 119-273.
  • 55
    Liu H, Soyars CL, Li J, Fei Q, He G, Peterson BA, Meyers BC, Nimchuk ZL, Wang X. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated resistance to cauliflower mosaic virus. Plant Direct, v.2, p. e00047, 2018.
  • 56
    Liu Y, Schiff M, Marathe R, Dinesh-Kumar SP. Tobacco Rar1, EDS1 and NPR1/NIM1 like genes are required for N-mediated resistance to tobacco mosaic virus. The Plant Journal, v.30, p. 415-429, 2002.
  • 57
    Luna, A.P. and R. Lozano-Duran, Geminivirus-Encoded Proteins: Not All Positional Homologs Are Made Equal. Frontiers in Microbiology, v.11, p. 878, 2020.
  • 58
    Luo MC, Gu YQ, Puiu D, Wang H, Twardziok SO, Deal KR, Huo N, Zhu T, Wang L, Wang Y, McGuire PE, Liu S, Long H, Ramasamy RK, Rodriguez JC, Van SL, Yuan L, Wang Z, Xia Z, Xiao L, Anderson OD, Ouyang S, Liang Y, Zimin AV, Pertea G, Qi P, Bennetzen JL, Dai X, Dawson MW, Müller HG, Kugler K, Rivarola-Duarte L, Spannagl M, Mayer KFX, Lu FH, Bevan MW, Leroy P, Li P, You FM, Sun Q, Liu Z, Lyons E, Wicker T, Salzberg SL, Devos KM, Dvořák J. Genome sequence of the progenitor of the wheat D genome Aegilops tauschii. Nature, v.551, p.498-502, 2017.
  • 59
    Macleod, Alan & Pautasso, Marco & Jeger, Mike & Haines-Young, Roy. Evolution of the international regulation of plant pest and challenges for future plant health. Food Security, v.2, p.49-70, 2010.
  • 60
    Martínez de Alba, A.E., E. Elvira-Matelot, and H. Vaucheret, Gene silencing in plants: A diversity of pathways. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms, v.1829, p. 1300-1308, 2013.
  • 61
    McGinnis, K.M., RNAi for functional genomics in plants. Briefings in Functional Genomics, v.9, p. 111-117, 2010.
  • 62
    More P, Agarwal P, Anand A, Sanan-Mishra N, Agarwal PK. Artificial miRNA mediated resistance in tobacco against Jatropha leaf curl Gujarat virus by targeting RNA silencing suppressors. Scientific Reports, v.11, p. 890, 2021.
  • 63
    Mubarik MS, Khan SH, Ahmad A, Raza A, Khan Z, Sajjad M, Sammour RHA, Mustafa AEMA, Al-Ghamdi AA, Alajmi AH, Alshamasi FKI, Elshikh MS. Controlling Geminiviruses before Transmission: Prospects. Plants (Basel, Switzerland), v.9, p. 1556, 2020.
  • 64
    Mubin M, Hussain M, Briddon RW, Mansoor S. Selection of target sequences as well as sequence identity determine the outcome of RNAi approach for resistance against cotton leaf curl geminivirus complex. Virology Journal, v.8, p. 122, 2011.
  • 65
    Nawaz, Bilal & NAEEM, MUHAMMAD HAMMAD & Malik, Tanwir & Muhae ud Din, Ghulam & Ahmad, Qadeer & Sattar, Saira. A Review about Cotton Leaf Curl Viral Disease and Its Control Strategies in Pakistan. International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research, v.3, p.132-147, 2019.
  • 66
    Nicaise, V., Crop immunity against viruses: outcomes and future challenges. Frontiers in Plant Sciences, v.5, p. 660-660, 2014.
  • 67
    Nishiguchi, M. and K. Kobayashi, Attenuated plant viruses: Preventing virus diseases and understanding the molecular mechanism. Journal of General Plant Pathology, v.77, p. 221-229, 2011.
  • 68
    Ntui, Valentine & Kong, Kynet & Azadi, Pejman & Khan, Raham & Chin, Dong & Igawa, Tomoko & Mii, Masahiro & Nakamura, Ikuo. RNAi-Mediated Resistance to Cucumber Mosaic Virus (CMV) in Genetically Engineered Tomato. American Journal of Plant Sciences, v.5, p. 554-572, 2014.
  • 69
    Oh SK, Yi SY, Yu SH, Moon JS, Park JM, Choi D. CaWRKY2, a chili pepper transcription factor, is rapidly induced by incompatible plant pathogens. Molecules and Cells, v.22, p. 58-64, 2006.
  • 70
    OWOR, B., LEGG, J.P., OKAO-OKUJA, G., OBONYO, R. and OGENGA-LATIGO, M.W. The effect of cassava mosaic geminiviruses on symptom severity, growth and root yield of a cassava mosaic virus disease-susceptible cultivar in Uganda. Annals of Applied Biology, v.143, p. 331-337, 2004.
  • 71
    Pandey, S.P. and I.E. Somssich, The role of WRKY transcription factors in plant immunity. Plant Physiology, v.150, p.1648-55, 2009.
  • 72
    Pechinger K, Chooi KM, MacDiarmid RM, Harper SJ, Ziebell H. A New Era for Mild Strain Cross-Protection. Viruses, v.11, p. 670, 2019.
  • 73
    Rahman M, Khan AQ, Rahmat Z, Iqbal MA and Zafar Y. Genetics and Genomics of Cotton Leaf Curl Disease, Its Viral Causal Agents and Whitefly Vector: A Way Forward to Sustain Cotton Fiber Security. Frontiers in Plant Sciences, v.8, p. 1157, 2017.
  • 74
    Reddy DV, Sudarshana MR, Fuchs M, Rao NC, Thottappilly G. Genetically engineered virus-resistant plants in developing countries: current status and future prospects. Advances in Virus Research, v.75, p. 185-220, 2009.
  • 75
    Roumagnac P, Lett JM, Fiallo-Olivé E, Navas-Castillo J, Zerbini FM, Martin DP, Varsani A. Establishment of five new genera in the family Geminiviridae: Citlodavirus, Maldovirus, Mulcrilevirus, Opunvirus, and Topilevirus. Archives of Virology, v.167, p. 695-710, 2022.
  • 76
    Roy, S & Ali, Md Sahadat & Mony, F & Islam, Sirajul & Matin, Md. Chemical Control of Whitefly and Aphid Insect Pest of French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research, v.2, p. 69-75, 2014.
  • 77
    Rubio, L., L. Galipienso, and I. Ferriol, Detection of Plant Viruses and Disease Management: Relevance of Genetic Diversity and Evolution. Frontiers in Plant Sciences, v.11, p. 1092, 2020
  • 78
    Sanjukta Dey, Marion Wenig, Gregor Langen, Sapna Sharma, Karl G. Kugler, Claudia Knappe, Bettina Hause, Marlies Bichlmeier, Valiollah Babaeizad, Jafargholi Imani, Ingar Janzik, Thomas Stempfl, Ralph Hückelhoven, Karl-Heinz Kogel, Klaus F.X. Mayer, A. Corina Vlot, Bacteria-Triggered Systemic Immunity in Barley Is Associated with WRKY and ETHYLENE RESPONSIVE FACTORs but Not with Salicylic Acid. Plant Physiology, v.166, p.2133–2151. 2014.
  • 79
    Schrader, G. and J.-G. Unger, Plant Quarantine as a Measure Against Invasive Alien Species: The Framework of the International Plant Protection Convention and the plant health regulations in the European Union. Biological Invasions, 2003. V.5, p. 357-364.
  • 80
    Sen, G.L. and H.M. Blau, A brief history of RNAi: the silence of the genes. FASEB Journal, v.20, p. 1293-1299, 2006.
  • 81
    Shafiq, M., Asad, S., Zafar, Y., Briddon, RW., Manzoor, S., Pepper leaf curl Lahore virus requires the DNA B component of Tomato leaf curl New Delhi virus to cause leaf curl symptoms. Virology Journal, v.7, p. 367, 2010.
  • 82
    Shahriar SA, Islam MN, Chun CNW, Rahim MA, Paul NC, Uddain J, Siddiquee S. Control of Plant Viral Diseases by CRISPR/Cas9: Resistance Mechanisms, Strategies and Challenges in Food Crops. Plants, v.10, p.1264, 2021.
  • 83
    Sharma, Anket & Kumar, Vinod & Shahzad, Babar & Tanveer, Mohsin & Sidhu, Gagan Preet Singh & Handa, Neha & Kohli, Sukhmeen & Yadav, Poonam & Bali, Aditi & Parihar, Ripu & Dar, Owias & Singh, Kirpal & Jasrotia, Shivam & Bakshi, Palak & M, Ramakrishnan & Kumar, Sandeep & Bhardwaj, Renu & Thukral, Ashwani. Worldwide pesticide usage and its impacts on ecosystem. SN Applied Sciences, v.1, p. 1446, 2019.
  • 84
    Sharma, V.K., S. Basu, and S. Chakraborty, RNAi mediated broad-spectrum transgenic resistance in Nicotiana benthamiana to chilli-infecting begomoviruses. Plant Cell Reports, v.34, p. 1389-1399, 2015.
  • 85
    Shimizu, T., Yoshii, M., Wei, T., Hirochika, H., & Omura, T. Silencing by RNAi of the gene for Pns12, a viroplasm matrix protein of Rice dwarf virus, results in strong resistance of transgenic rice plants to the virus. Plant Biotechnology Journal ,v.7, p. 24-32, 2008.
  • 86
    Talakayala, A., S. Ankanagari, and M. Garladinne, CRISPR-Cas genome editing system: A versatile tool for developing disease resistant crops. Plant Stress, v.3, p. e100056, 2022.
  • 87
    Thakur, H., Jindal, S. K., Sharma, A., & Dhaliwal, M. S. Molecular mapping of dominant gene responsible for leaf curl virus resistance in chilli pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). 3 Biotech, v.10, p. 182, 2020.
  • 88
    Tudi, M., Daniel Ruan, H., Wang, L., Lyu, J., Sadler, R., Connell, D., Chu, C., & Phung, D. T. Agriculture Development, Pesticide Application and Its Impact on the Environment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, v.18, p. 1112, 2021.
  • 89
    Vanderschuren, H., Alder, A., Zhang, P., & Gruissem, W. Dose-dependent RNAi-mediated geminivirus resistance in the tropical root crop cassava. Plant Molecular Biology, v.70, p. 265-272, 2009.
  • 90
    Waage, J.K. and J.D. Mumford, Agricultural biosecurity, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, v.363, p. 863-76, 2008.
  • 91
    Weintraub, P., Physical Control: An Important Tool in Pest Management Programs, In: Ishaaya, I., Horowitz, A. (eds) Bio rational Control of Arthropod Pests. Springer, Dordrecht. 2009. p. 317-324.
  • 92
    Xu, Y. Q., Wang, H., Qin, R. L., Fang, L. J., Liu, Z., Yuan, S. S., Gai, Y. P., & Ji, X. L. Characterization of NPR1 and NPR4 genes from mulberry (Morus multicaulis) and their roles in development and stress resistance. Physiologia Plantarum, v.167, p. 302-316, 2019.
  • 93
    Younis A, Siddique MI, Kim CK, Lim KB. RNA Interference (RNAi) Induced Gene Silencing: A Promising Approach of Hi-Tech Plant Breeding. International Journal of Biological Sciences, v.10, p. 1150-1158, 2014
  • 94
    Zerbini, F. M., Briddon, R. W., Idris, A., Martin, D. P., Moriones, E., Navas-Castillo, J., Rivera-Bustamante, R., Roumagnac, P., Varsani, A., & Ictv Report Consortium. ICTV Virus Taxonomy Profile: Geminiviridae. Journal of General Virology, v.98, p. 131-133, 2017.
  • 95
    Zhou C, Zhou Y. Strategies for viral cross protection in plants. Methods in Molecular Biology. v.894, p. 69-81, 2012.
  • 96
    Ziebell, H. and J.P. Carr, Cross-Protection: A Century of Mystery. Advances in Virus Research, v.76, p. 211-264, 2010.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    13 Feb 2023
  • Date of issue
    Oct-Dec 2022

History

  • Received
    05 July 2022
  • Accepted
    15 Sept 2022
Grupo Paulista de Fitopatologia FCA/UNESP - Depto. De Produção Vegetal, Caixa Postal 237, 18603-970 - Botucatu, SP Brasil, Tel.: (55 14) 3811 7262, Fax: (55 14) 3811 7206 - Botucatu - SP - Brazil
E-mail: summa.phyto@gmail.com