Bryophytes on rocky outcrops in the caatinga biome: a conservationist perspective

ARTICLES

Bryophytes on rocky outcrops in the caatinga biome: a conservationist perspective¹

Joan Bruno SilvaI,II,^*; Shirley Rangel Germano^II

^IUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco, Programa de Pós-graduação em Biologia Vegetal, Laboratório de Briófitas, Recife, PE, Brazil

^IIUniversidade Estadual da Paraíba, Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Departamento de Biologia Campus I, Campina Grande, PR, Brazil

ABSTRACT

In the state of Paraíba, Brazil, there is an abundance of rocky outcrops, which are typical elements of the semi-arid landscape. Those outcrops provide refuge to species with morphological adaptations to stressful climates and to rare communities of plants, including bryophytes. Nevertheless, there have been no studies of bryophytes in such habitats in the state. Therefore, this work aimed to inventory bryophytes on two outcrops in the municipality of Puxinanã, in Paraíba, addressing some of the ecological aspects of survival in xerophytic environments. Samples were collected once every two weeks from February 2010 to May 2011. The usual techniques of bryophyte sampling and herbarium preservation were employed. We recorded 21 bryophyte species (six liverworts and 15 mosses), some of which are rare for Brazil. We performed cluster analysis, using the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean, based on the Sørensen similarity index. We thus defined three clusters among the studied outcrops and similar areas recorded in the literature. The rocky outcrops proved to be singular in terms of bryophyte species composition, which, as in most xerophytic environments, included light-demanding and generalist species, featuring various morphological adaptations to resist water stress, primarily in terms of their leaf structure. Our results demonstrate the urgent need for additional studies in the state of Paraíba, including floristic, conservation, evolutionary and biogeographic studies.

Key words: bryophyte, inselberg, morphological adaptations, nonvascular flora, semi-arid, northeastern Brazil

Introduction

Featuring a semi-arid climate, the northeastern region of Brazil has a large number of rocky outcrops, which are defined as monolithic rocks or rock clusters that appear abruptly in the midst of the surrounding shrublands, known as caatinga (Porembski et al. 1997). Such outcrops are typically composed of granite or gneiss (Porembski et al. 1998; Sarthou et al. 2003), with foci of rare, endemic plant communities (Oliveira & Godoy 2007). Because they provide habitats in which there is constant exposure to wind and sunlight (Araújo et al. 2008) and, consequently, rapid evaporation (Willis 1934), these rocky outcrops are classified as xeric environments. Nevertheless, they are excellent sites for comparative geophysical studies, as well as for studies of the factors influencing floristic diversity (Porembski 2007). Although plant communities are commonly found on these formations, there have been few studies of such communities (Araújo et al. 2008). In the northeastern Brazilian state of Paraíba, there have been some studies of vascular flora among rocky outcrops (Fevereiro & Fevereiro 1980; Almeida et al. 2007a, 2007b; Porto et al. 2008; Tölke et al. 2011). However, studies of bryophytes in the state have been restricted to forest environments (Yano & Andrade-Lima 1987; Pôrto & Germano 2002; Lüt & Schafer-Verwimp 2004; Yano 2004; Pôrto et al. 2004).

Consequently, the present study is the first of its kind, in that it was aimed at providing data related to bryophyte communities among rocky outcrops in the state of Paraíba.

Material and methods

Study area

The study was conducted in the municipality of Puxinanã, within the Agreste region of the state of Paraíba, Brazil. In the study area, the climate is dry and the topography comprises deep, narrow valleys (Beltrão et al. 2005), where there are extensive groups of rock formations (Oliveira & Godoy 2007).

On the basis of visits and prior surveys, we selected two study sites, designated rocky outcrops 1 and 2 (RO1 and RO2, respectively). At RO1, which is near the middle of the most urbanized sector of Puxinanã (at 07°08'62"S; 35°58'31"W), the elevation is 661 m, the average annual temperature is 23.7°C, and the average annual rainfall is 520 mm. At RO2, located on the Beija-Flor Grange (also within Puxinanã, at 07°14'91"S; 35°97'64"W), the elevation is 575 m, the average annual temperature is 24.2°C, and the average annual rainfall is 428 mm. At both sites, the tree and shrub vegetation at the top of the outcrop is typical of the caatinga, whereas in the lower, surrounding areas, the native flora has been supplanted by cultivated vegetation.

Sampling and study of the material

Specimens were collected once every two weeks between February 2010 and May 2011. We sampled all available substrates from the bottom to the top of each outcrop, following the techniques for collection and herbarium preservation of bryophytes described in Yano (1984), Gradstein et al. (2001) and Frahm (2003).

Samples were deposited in the Manoel de Arruda Câmara Herbarium (ACAM), located on Campus I of Paraíba State University, in the city of Campina Grande. The identification of the taxa was based on the works of Gradstein & Buskes (1985), Gradstein (1989; 1994), Sharp et al. (1994), Buck (1998), Reiner-Drehwald (2000), Gradstein et al. (2001), Gradstein & Costa (2003) and Goffinet & Buck (2004), as well as on other specialized articles and monographs. The classification systems adopted for compiling the floristic list of bryophytes were those devised by Crandall-Stotler et al. (2009) for liverworts and by Goffinet et al. (2009) for mosses. The taxonomic nomenclature was updated according to recent studies and through a review of the database of the Missouri Botanical Garden (W³ TROPICOS 2010). The identities of species that were difficult to distinguish were confirmed by experts.

The geographical distribution was obtained from the databases of the Rio de Janeiro Botanical Garden (Costa 2012) and the Missouri Botanical Garden (W³ TROPICOS 2010), as well as from the catalogs published by Yano (1989; 1993; 1995; 1996; 2004; 2006; 2010; 2011).

The growth forms were determined in accordance with Mägdefrau (1982) and Gradstein et al. (1996). The specific synusia was determined on the basis of the data contained in Gradstein (1992) and in other works dealing with ecology.

Information on the conservation status of the species identified were obtained from Ganeva (1998), from the Red List of Threatened Bryophytes in Brazil, published by the Biodiversitas Foundation (Biodiversitas 2005), and from the New Zealand Threat Classification System lists compiled by Hitchmough et al. (2005).

Data analysis

The climatic conditions (resolution, 2.5 min) were obtained from the WorldClim database (Hijmans et al. 2005b) via the program DIVA-GIS, version 5.2 (Hijmans et al. 2005a). We compared bryophyte species composition between the two outcrops sampled (RO1 and RO2), as well as between the sampled sites and other areas with similar abiotic characteristics, in terms of aspects such as rainfall and temperature—caatinga area 1 (CA1), caatinga area 2 (CA2), an area within the dry, rocky grasslands known as campos rupestres (CR) and another rocky outcrop, located in the state of Bahia (RO3). To that end, we performed cluster analysis using the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA), based on the Sørensen similarity index, which excludes double absence and assigns greater weight to co-occurrence (Valentin 2000). The calculation of the Sørensen similarity index and the UPGMA were both achieved with the program Fitopac 2.1 (Shepherd 2010). For a list of the species occurring at the comparison sites, see Pôrto et al. (1994) for CA1, Pôrto & Bezerra (1996) for CA2, Bastos et al. (2000) for CR and Pôrto & Valente (2006) for RO3.

Results and discussion

At the two study sites, we identified 21 bryophyte species (Tab. 1): 15 mosses, belonging to 11 genera within eight families; and six liverworts, belonging to three genera within three families. The bryophyte species richness at our study sites was comparable to that reported for inselbergs in the African nation of Benin by Frahm & Porembski (1997), who recorded 18 species, although lower than that reported for inselbergs in the Ivory Coast and Zimbabwe, for which 31 and 25 bryophyte species, respectively, have been recorded (Frahm 1996). In addition, there is a clear dissimilarity in the composition of species, as only Gemmabryum exile (also known as Brachymenium exile) and Octoblepharum albidum are common to the regions of Africa studied.

The families with the highest species richness in the present study (Bryaceae and Frullaniaceae) are among the top 10 families found in inventories of various vegetation types in tropical regions (Gradstein & Pócs 1989). Representatives of those families seem to have great ability to colonize rock surfaces, making them important pioneer species. Such species include Frullania gibbosa and Bryum argenteum, which were also the most common species in the present study (respectively accounting for 18.7% and 15.6% of the total species richness), followed by Fabronia ciliaris var. wrightii (15.6%), B. argenteum (15.6%) and Gemmabryum exile (12.5%). In addition, Bryaceae and Frullaniaceae were the only families to be represented in all of the areas evaluated (caatinga and rocky outcrops), although there were no species that occurred in all six areas.

Due to the inherent morphology of their gametophytes, mosses typically outnumber liverworts in tropical rain forests (Gradstein et al. 2001). However, on rocky outcrops and in other xeric environments, that relationship is inverted, as shown by the results obtained here and in (the few) other studies of bryophytes in such environments.

The UPGMA cluster analysis identified three principal clusters (RO1/RO2; CA1/CA2; and CR/RO3), with a cophenetic correlation of 0.98 (Fig. 1). The Sørensen similarity index ranged from 0.60 (between RO1 and RO2) to 0.00 (between RO3 and CA2). We found no significant similarity among the various areas of caatinga evaluated. This confirms the uniqueness of the rock formations. Among rocky outcrops within the caatinga biome, the relationship between the top of each outcrop and its surroundings is dependent on how similar the two zones are in terms of their flora (Gomes et al. 2011). The members of each cluster identified here were also within close geographical proximity of each other. Nevertheless, the only significant correlation (Sørensen similarity index > 0.5; Valentin 2000) was between RO1 and RO2. Further studies might elucidate the factors that best explain the similarity among communities of bryophytes on rocky outcrops.

It is noteworthy that little is known of the bryophyte flora in Paraíba. The few bryophyte studies of conducted in the state have focused on forest areas (Yano & Andrade-Lima 1987; Pôrto & Germano 2002; Lüth & Schafer-Verwimp 2004; Yano 2004), resulting in a lack of bryophyte studies in the caatinga. This explains also the high number of first records, which are mostly of bryophytes recorded extensively for other states in Brazil, except for Fabronia ciliaris var. wrightii (recorded only for Rio de Janeiro) and Aschisma carniolicum (recorded only for Bahia and Pernambuco), which are rare species for Brazil.

Most of the species identified in the present study were classified as neotropical or pantropical (28% each), although 19% were classified as widely distributed. Species unique to Brazil, collectively with species occurring in Africa and the Americas, accounted for 10% of the total, whereas those occurring in Europe and the Americas accounted for only 5% (Tab. 1). This pattern of geographical distribution mirrors that commonly found in forest regions dominated by neotropical and pantropical species that generally occur in the Atlantic Forest ecosystem.

Morphological attributes

We recorded three growth forms (Tab. 1): mat, turf and weft. The prevailing form was turf. In studies of lowland tropical forests, Costa (1999) and Montefort & Ek (1990) found that the aggregated forms, such as mat, weft and turf, were characteristic and were predominant in open areas, with high light intensity and air humidity, high. The liverworts showed the mat growth form.

The predominance of the turf growth form was expected, because that form is more desiccation tolerant (poikilohydric), facilitating the conduction of water to the surface (Watson 1914; Magdefraü 1982).

The rapid absorption and conduction of water through the aerial portions of their bodies make bryophytes excellent colonizers of environments such as rocky outcrops, given that, except in those with crevices or dense vegetation, the rainwater that falls on such environments drains to the rock below (Neves & Conceição 2007). Together with rapid evaporation (Willis 1934), this makes rocky outcrops environments that are deficient in water. The ability of bryophytes to absorb water and nutrients from rain, fog droplets and atmospheric dust make these plants specialists in nutritionally limited environments (Proctor 2008).

Bryophytes have developed several other attributes to resist the water stress inherent to rocky environments: leaf pattern, hairiness and characteristics specific to sporophytes (in the fertile species), as well as poikilohydry, which is a mechanism of defense against periods of drought (Porembski et al. 1997, 1998; Gignac 2001; Frahm 1996, 2004; Proctor 2008).

The leaf pattern seems to be especially crucial as an adaptive character. The species Bryum argenteum, Rosulabryum billarderi and Acanthocoleus aberrans var. laevis have an imbricate (overlapping) leaf pattern, whereas Gemmabryum exile, Rosulabryum capillare, Helicophyllum torquatum and Aschisma carniolicum have curled leaves. According to Watson (1914; 1933), curled and overlapping leaves are both excellent in dry environments, because they reduce the amount of water lost through transpiration.

Entodontopsis leucostega (Stereophyllaceae), as well as representatives of Sematophyllaceae and Fabroniaceae, present concave leaves, the adaxial surface of which is used for storing water, while the abaxial surface is used for gas exchange (Proctor 2008). This leaf pattern also facilitates the conduction of water to the surface (Frahm 2003). Gemmabryum exile, Calymperes palisotii Schwägr., Fabronia ciliaris var. wrightii and F. ciliaris var. polycarpa show the patent leaves, which decrease the absorption of light, resulting in less damage (Grebe 1913).

The liverworts display quadrate leaves, which protect themselves from desiccation by curling during times of drought and absorb water rapidly during rehydration (Watson 1914). In the present study, this pattern was seen in Frullania ericoides and F. gibbosa.

With the exception of the Sematophyllaceae species, a central strand was present in all of the mosses evaluated. According to Watson (1914), the enlargement of this structure, as seen in the Calymperaceae species cataloged, reduces the surface area available for water loss and compensates for photosynthesis by the presence of vertical lines of cells, thus adapting the plants to hostile climates.

Completing the set of traits that allow bryophytes to adapt to xeric environments are the mechanisms of storage, such as the separate lobes seen in Frullaniaceae and Lejeuneaceae (Thiers 1988; Frahm 2003), the hairy structures seen in Helicophyllum torquatum, the leaf borders seen in Calymperes palisotii, and the hyalocysts seen in Calymperaceae and Pottiaceae (Frahm 2000; 2003).

Evaluating reproduction, we observed low fertility rate in the samples collected. That might be a consequence of the habitat fragmentation caused by human activities on the outcrops studied in Puxinanã. In addition, in bryophytes adapted to xeric climates, reproduction peaks during milder (wetter) periods, because there is a considerable loss of metabolic power during periods of desiccation (Proctor 2008), which impedes reproduction, limiting dispersal and interspecific exchange.

In the present study, the only species found to present vegetative reproduction (gemmae) were Calymperes palisotii and Odontoschisma longiflorum. According to Magnusson (1983), species employing this type of reproduction are generally pioneers. Thiers (1988) argued that gemmae can arise from a lack of a spore dispersal mechanism. According to Gradstein & Pócs (1989), gemmae are excellent structures for dispersion over short distances, because they are vegetative sprouts, providing an alternative mechanism for bryophytes that need to survive drought conditions (Proctor 2008).

In Aschisma carniolicum, the sessile sporophyte is protected by perichaetial leaves. The curvature and roughness of the capsule (both seen in Bryum argenteum) promote the full use of the capsular space without exposing the entire structure to desiccation (Watson, 1914; 1933). Grebe (1913) stated that the main sporophyte adaptation to xeric conditions (water storage and the prevention of transpiration) is seen in the sessile or capsule-down condition.

According to Patterson (1964), there are no structures effectively able to circumvent transpiration. Grebe (1913) and Frahm (2000) agree that some typical forest species have characters that can adapt them to xeric environments, suggesting that the characteristics are common and nonspecific.

Conservation

According to the Red List of Threatened Bryophytes in Brazil published by the Biodiversitas Foundation (Biodiversitas 2005), which lists 17 species of mosses and liverworts, none of the species identified in the present study are classified as threatened.

The fact that the bryophytes recorded in this study have not appeared on the list of threatened species in Brazil or on the International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List of Threatened Species, both published in 2005, does not preclude the need for conservation studies. According Fife et al. (2010), many species of mosses and liverworts have, over the years, been excluded and included in the listings of endangered species within the same area.

It is known that rocky outcrops are refuges for species that suffer from grazing and human activities (Burke et al. 1998; Oliveira & Godoy 2007). At both of our study sites, we recorded species that are typical forest formations and not yet registered for the caatinga (Costa 2012): Acanthocoleus aberrans var. laevis; Fabronia ciliaris var. wrightii; and Odontoschisma longiflorum. That gives greater weight to such information and underscores the need for studies dealing with the conservation, evolution and biogeography of bryophytes in Brazil.

At both of our study sites, there is constant human activity, most recently at RO1. This explains the high proportion of generalist species at both sites (50.0% and 62.5% at RO1 and RO2, respectively). According to Alvarenga et al. (2010), such species are common in disturbed areas. In addition, exposed areas, such as rocky outcrops, favor the occurrence of light-demanding species at the expense of those that are shade-tolerant (Gradstein et al. 2001; Frahm 2003). In the present study, light-demanding species accounted for 41.6% and 31.25% of the species richness at RO1 and RO2, respectively. Among the species occurring at both study sites, only one (Odontoschisma longiflorum) was shade-tolerant. The recording of that species could indicate the refuge potential of these ecological nooks, given the constant degradation of their surroundings. In addition, the recording of species typical of the caatinga can be explained by the uniqueness of the rocky outcrops.

Therefore, there is a need for additional floristic surveys of bryophytes in the state of Paraíba, which is rich in these formations. Including these environments in detailed studies could further the creation of conservation areas, as suggested by Burke (2003).

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr. Kátia Cavalcanti Pôrto, of the Federal University of Pernambuco, Dr. Olga Yano, of the Botanical Institute of São Paulo, Dr. Stephan Robbert Gradstein, of the University of Göttingen and Dr. Denilson Fernandes Peralta, of the Botanical Institute of São Paulo, for their assistance in identifying some of the species. Dr. Peralta also provided the bibliography.

References

AESA – Agência Executiva de Gestão das Águas do Estado da Paraíba. Boletim de informações climáticas. 2006. http://www.aesa.pb.gov.br. (Acesso em 06/09/2010).

Almeida, A.; Felix, W.J.P.; Andrade, L.A.; Felix, L.P. 2007a. A família Orchidaceae em inselbergues da Paraíba, Nordeste do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Biociências 5: 753-755.

Almeida, A.; Felix, W.J.P.; Andrade, L.A.; Felix, L.P. 2007b. Leguminosae na flora de inselbergues no estado da Paraíba, Nordeste do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Biociências 5: 750-752.

Alvarenga, L.D.P.; Pôrto, K.C. & Oliveira, J.R.P.M. 2010. Habitat loss effects on spatial distribution of non-vascular epiphytes in a Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biodiversity and Conservation 19: 619-635.

Araújo, F.S.; Oliveira, R.F. & Lima-Verde, L.W. 2008. Composição, Espectro Biológico e Síndromes de Dispersão da Vegetação de um Inselbergue no Domínio da Caatinga, Ceará. Rodriguésia 4: 659-671.

Bastos, C.J.P., Yano, O. & Bôas-Bastos, S.B. 2000. Briófitas de campos rupestres da Chapada Diamantina, Estado da Bahia, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Botânica 23: 357-368.

Beltrão, B.A.; Morais, F.; Mascarenhas, J.C.; Miranda, J.L.F.; Junior, L.C.S. & Mendes, V.A. 2005. Projeto cadastro de fontes de abastecimento por água subterrânea: diagnóstico do município de Puxinanã, Estado da Paraíba. Recife, CPRM/PRODEEM.

BIODIVERSITAS. Lista Vermelha da Flora Brasileira Ameaçada de Extinção. 2005. http://www.biodiversitas.org.br/floraBr/grupo3fim.asp. (Acesso em 15/06/2011).

Buck, W.R. 1998. Pleurocarpous Mosses of the West Indies. Memoirs of The New York Botanical Garden 1: 1-401.

Burke, A. 2003. Inselbergues in a changing world - global trends. Diversity and Distributions 9: 375-383.

Burke, A.; Jürgens, N. & Selly, M.K. 1998. Floristics affinities of an inselbergue archipelago in the southern Namib desert - relic of the past, centre of endemism or nothing special? Journal of Biogeography 25: 311-317.

Costa, D.P. 1999. Epiphytic bryophyte diversity in primary and secondary lowland rainforest in southearstern Brazil. The Bryologist 102: 320-326.

Costa, D.P. 2012. Lista de Espécies da Flora do Brasil. Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro. http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/2012/FB000006. (Acesso em 12/05/2012).

Crandall-Stotler, B.; Stotler, R. E. & Long, D.G. 2009. Morphology and classification of the Marchantiophyta. Pp. 1-54. In: Goffinet, B. & Shaw, A.J. (Eds.). Bryophyte Biology. 2 ed. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Estima-t. Unidade Acadêmica de Ciências Atmosféricas. Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG). http://www.dca.ufcg.edu.br/. (Acesso em 28/12/2012).

Fevereiro, P. C. A.; Fevereiro, V. P. B. 1980. Composição fl orística de alguns inselbergs do Estado da Paraíba: I – A fl ora da Pedra dos Caboclos: observações preliminares. Agropecuária Técnica 1: 126-131.

Frahm, J-P. 1996. Diversity, life strategies, origins and distribution of tropical inselberg bryophytes. Anales del Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México 67: 73-86.

Frahm, J-P. 2000. Bryophytes. Pp. 91-102. In: Porebski, S. & Barthlott, W. (Eds.) Inselbegues. Biotic Diversity of Isolated Rock Outcrops in Tropical and Temperate Regions. Springer.

Frahm, J-P. 2003. Manual of Tropical Bryology. Tropical Bryology 23: 9-195.

Frahm, J-P. 2004. Recent Developments of Commercial Products from Bryophytes. The Bryologist 107: 277-283.

Frahm, J-P. & Porembski, S. 1997. Moose von Inselbergen in Benin Tropical Bryology 14: 3-9.

Ganeva, A. 1993. Preliminary data on Bulgarian threatened bryophytes. Lindbergia 23: 33-37.

Gignac, D. 2001. New Frontiers in Bryology and Lichenology Bryophytes as Indicators of Climate Change. The Bryologist 104: 410-420.

Goffinet, B. & Buck, W.R. 2004. Systematics of Bryophyta: from molecules to a revised classification. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden 98: 205-239.

Goffinet, B.; Buck, W.R. & Shaw, A.J. 2009. Morphology, anatomy, and classification of the Bryophyta. Pp. 55-126. In: B. Goffinet & A. J. Shaw (Eds.), Bryophyte Biology. ed. 2. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Gomes, P.; Costa, K.C.C.; Rodal, M.J.N. & Alves, M. 2011. Checklist of Angiosperms from the Pedra Furada Municipal Park, northeastern Brazil. Check List 7: 173-181.

Gradstein, S.R. & Buskes, G.M.C. 1985. A revision of Neotropical Archile-jeunea (Spruce) Schiffn., Beiheft. Nova Hedwigia 80: 89-112.

Gradstein, S.R. 1989. A key of the Hepaticae and Antocerotae of Puerto Rico and the Virgins Islands. Nova Hedwigia 80: 221-248.

Gradstein, S.R. 1992. Threatended bryophytes of the neotropical rain forest: a status report. Tropical Bryology 6: 83-93.

Gradstein, S.R. 1994. Lejeuneaceae, Ptychantheae, Brachiolejeuneae. Flora Neotropica Monograph 62: 1-225.

Gradstein, S.R. & Costa, D. P. 2003. The Hepaticae and Anthocerotae of Brazil. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 87: 1-318.

Gradstein, S.R. & Pócs, T. 1989. Bryophytes. Pp. 311-325. In: Tropical Rain Forest Ecosystems. Amsterdan.

Gradstein, S.R.; Churchill, S.P. & Allen, N.S. 2001. Guide to the Bryophytes of Tropical America. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 86: 1-577.

Gradstein, S.R.; Hietz, P.; Lücking, R.; Lücking, A.; Sipman, H.J.M.; Vester, H.F.M.; Wolf, J.H.D. & Gardette, E. 1996. How to sample the epiphytic diversity of tropical rain forests. Ecotropica 2: 59-72.

Grebe, K. 1913. Review: Xerophilous Adaptations in Mosses. The Journal of Ecology 1: 124.

Hijmans, R.J.; Guarino, L.; Jarvis, A.; O'Brien, R. & Mathur, P. 2005a. DIVA-GIS, version 5.2. A geographic information system fo the analysis of biodiversity data. Manual. International Potato Center, Peru.

Hijmans, R.J.; Cameron, S.E. Cameron; Parra, J.L.; Jones, P.G. & Jarvis, A. 2005b. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology 25: 1965-1978.

Hitchmough, R.; Bull, L. & Cromarty, P. (compilers). 2005. New Zealand Threat Classification System lists. http://www.doc.govt.nz/documents/science-and-technical/sap236.pdf. (Acesso em: 20/06/2011).

Leal, I.R.; Silva, J.M.C. da; Tabarelli, M; Júnior, T.E.L. 2005. Changing the course of Biodiversity Conservation Caatinga of Northeastern Brazil. Conservation Biology 19: 701-706.

Lüth, M. & Schäfer-Verwimp, A. 2004. Additions to the Bryophyte Flora of the Neotropics. Tropical Bryology 25: 7-17.

Mägdefrau, K. 1982. Life-forms of bryophytes. Pp. 45-58. In: Smith, A.J. (Ed.) Bryophyte Ecology. London, Chapman and Hall Ltd.

Magnussun, M. 1983. Composition and succession of bryophytes and lichens in an outer coastal dune area in southern Sweden. Cryptogamic, Bryology and Lichénology 4: 335-355.

Montefort, D. & Ek, R.C. 1990. Vertical distribuition and ecology of epiphytic bryophytes and lichens in a lowland rain forest in French Guiana. Utrecht, Institute of Botany.

Moraes, A.O.; Melo, E.; Agra, M.F. & França, F. 2009. A família Solanaceae nos "Inselbergues" do semi-árido da Bahia, Brasil. Iheringia 64: 109-122.

Neves, S.P.S. & Conceição, A.A. 2007. Vegetação em Afloramentos Rochosos na Serra do Sincorá, Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brasil. Sitientibus Série Ciências Biológicas 7: 36-45.

Oliveira, R.B. de & Godoy, S.A.P. de. 2007. Composição florística dos afloramentos rochosos do Morro do Forno, São Paulo. Biota Neotropica 7(2): 37-48.

Patterson, P.M. 1964. Problems Presented by Bryophytic Xerophytism. The Bryologist 67(4): 390-396.

Porembski, S.; Seine, R. & Barthlott, W. 1997. Inselbergue vegetation and the biodiversity of granite outcrops. Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia 80: 193-199.

Porembski, S.; Martinelli, G.; Ohlemüler, R. & Barthlott, W. 1998. Diversity and ecology of saxicolous vegetation mats on inselbergues in the Brazilian Atlantic rainforest. Diversity and Distributions 4: 107-119.

Pôrto, K.C. & Bezerra, MªF.A. 1996. Briófitas da caatinga. 2. Agrestina PE. Acta Botanica Brasilica 10: 93-102.

Pôrto, K.C. & Germano, S.R. 2002. Biodiversidade e importância das briófitas na conservação dos ecossistemas naturais de Pernambuco. Pp.125-152. In: Tabarelli, M. & Silva, J.M.C. (Orgs.). Diagnóstico da Biodiversidade de Pernambuco. Recife, SECTMA – Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia e Meio Ambiente.

Pôrto, K.C.; Germano, S.R.; Borges, G.M. 2004. Avaliação dos Brejos de Altitude de Pernambuco e Paraíba, quanto à Diversidade de Briófitas, para a Conservação – Parte II. Pp. 79-97. In: Pôrto, K.C.; Cabral, J.J.P. & Tabarelli, M. (Orgs.). Brejos de altitude em Pernambuco e Paraíba: história natural, ecologia e conservação.

Pôrto, K.C.; Silveira, M. de F.G. da & Sá, P.S. de A. 1994. Briófitas da Caatinga I. Estação Experimental do Ipa, Caruaru - PE. Acta Botanica Brasilica 8: 77-85.

Porto, P.N.F.; Almeida, A.; Pessoa, W.J.; Trovão, D.; Felix, L.P. 2008. Composição florística de um inselbergueue no agreste Paraíbano, município de esperança, nordeste do brasil. Caatinga 21: 214-222.

Proctor, M.C.F. Physiological Ecology. 2008. In: Goffinet, Bernard; Shaw, A. Jonathan (Eds.). Bryophyte Biology. 2 ed. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Reiner-Drehwald, M.E. 2000. Las Lejeuneaceae (Hepaticae) de Misiones, Argentina. Tropical Bryology 19: 81-131.

Santana, J.A. da S. & Souto, J.S. 2006. Diversidade e Estrutura Fitossociológica da Caatinga na Estação Ecológica do Seridó-RN. Revista de Biologia e Ciências da Terra 6: 232-242.

Sharp, A.J.; Crum, H. & Eckel, P.M. 1994. The moss flora of Mexico. Memoirs of the New York. Botanical Garden 69: 1-1113.

Shepherd, G.J. 2010. Fitopac 2.1 - Campinas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas.

Thiers, B. M. 1988. Morphological adaptations of the Jungermanniales (Hepaticae) to the tropical rainforest habitat. Journal Hatttori Botanical Laboratory 64: 5-14,

Tölke, E.E.A.D.; Pereira, A.R.L; Silva, J.B.; Melo, J.I.M. 2011a. Passiflora luetzelburgii Harms (Passifloraceae): Nova Ocorrência para o Estado da Paraíba, Brasil. Rojasiana 10: 21-28.

Tölke, E.E.A.D.; Silva, J.B.; Pereira, A.R.L. & Melo, J.I.M. de. 2011b. Flora vascular de um inselbergueue no Estado da Paraíba, Nordeste do Brasil. Biotemas 2: 39-48.

Valente, E.B. & Pôrto, K.C. 2006c. Briófitas de uma área de afloramento rochoso na Serra da Jibóia, município de Santa Teresinha, Bahia, Brasil. Boletim do Instituto de Botânica 18: 207-211.

Valentin, J.L. 2000. Ecologia numérica uma introdução à análise multivariada de dados ecológicos. Rio de Janeiro, Editora Interciência.

W³ TROPICOS. Tropicos Home - Missouri Botanical Garden. 2010. http://www.tropicos.org/. (Acesso em 05/09/2010).

Watson, W.1914. Xerophytic Adaptations of Bryophytes in Relation to Habitat. The New Physiologist 8: 149-190.

Watson, W. 1933. The Evolutionary Aspects of Some Xerophytic Adaptations in the Bryophyta. The Bryologist 32(¼): 32-34.

Willis, B. 1934. Inselbergs. Association of American Geographers Annals 24: 123-129.

Yano, O. 1981. A checklist of brazilian mosses. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 50: 279-456.

Yano, O. 1984. Briófitas. Pp. 27-30. In: Fidalgo, O.; Bononi, V.L.R. (Coords). Técnicas de coleta, preservação e herborização de material botânico. Instituto de Botânica, São Paulo.

Yano, O. 1984. Checklist of brazilian liverworts and hornworts. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 56: 481-548.

Yano, O. 1989. An additional checklist of brazilian bryophytes. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 66: 371-434.

Yano, O. 1993. Briófitas do nordeste brasileiro: Estado da Paraíba, Brasil. Biologica Brasilica 5: 87-100.

Yano, O. 1995. A new additional annotated checklist of brazilian bryophytes. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 78: 137-182.

Yano, O. 1996. A checklist of brazilian bryophytes. Boletim do Instituto de Botânica 10: 47-232.

Yano, O. 2004. Novas ocorrências de briófitas para vários estados do Brasil. Acta Amazonica 34: 559-576.

Yano, O. 2006. Novas adições ao catálogo de briófitas brasileiras. Boletim do Instituto de Botânica 17: 1-142.

Yano, O. 2010. O atual conhecimento da Flora Brasileira: Briófitas. http://www.infobibos.com/Artigos/2010_3/Briofitas/index.htm. (Acesso em: 22 Ago 2011).

Yano, O. 2011. Catálogo de musgos brasileiros: literatura original, basiônimo, localidade-tipo e distribuição geográfica. São Paulo, Instituto de Botânica.

Yano, O; Andrade-Lima, D. 1987. Briófitas no nordeste brasileiro: estado de Pernambuco. Revista Brasileira de Botânica 10: 171-181.

Yano, O & Câmara, P.E.A.S. 2004. Briófitas de Manaus, Amazonas, Brasil. Acta Amazônica 34(3): 445-457.

Yano, O & Costa, D.P. 1992. Novas ocorrências de briófitas no Brasil. Pp. 33-45. In: Anais do Congresso da Sociedade Botânica de São Paulo. Campinas.

Yano, O & Mello, Z.R. 1999. Frullaniaceae dos manguezais do litoral sul de São Paulo, Brasil. Iheringia, Série Botânica 52: 65-87.

Yano, O & Peralta, D.F. 2006. Novas ocorrências de briófitas para os estados de Alagoas e Sergipe, Brasil. Arquivos do Museu Nacional 64: 287-297.

Yano, O & Peralta, D.F. 2006. Briófitas coletadas por Daniel Moreira Vital no Estado da Bahia, Brasil. Boletim do Instituto de Botânica 18: 33-73.

Yano, O & Peralta, D.F. 2007. Briófitas da Ilha do Bom Abrigo, Estado de São Paulo, Brasil. Hoehnea 34: 87-94.

Yano, O & Peralta, D.F. 2007. As briófitas ameaçadas de extinção no Estado do Espírito Santo. Pp. 81-87. In: Simonelli, M. & Fraga, C.M. (Orgs.). Espécies da flora ameaçadas de extinção no Estado do Espírito Santo Instituto de Pesquisas da Mata Atlântica. Vitória, Ipema.

Yano, O & Pôrto, K.C. 2006. Diversidade das briófitas das matas serranas do Ceará, Brasil. Hoehnea 33: 7-39.

Received: 4 September, 2012

Accepted: 24 October, 2013

1

Based on the B.Sc. dissertation of the first author

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  09 Jan 2014
• Date of issue
  Dec 2013

History

• Received
  04 Sept 2012
• Accepted
  24 Oct 2013