Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Use of gastrocnemius muscle on treatment of infected injuries of the knee

Abstracts

OBJECTIVE: to prospectively evaluate the use of gastrocnemius muscle flap in the treatment of knee infected injuries. METHODS: twelve patients were operated on: eleven males with ages ranging from 19 to 78 years, mean: 55 years. Coverage of injuries with medial gastrocnemius muscle was accomplished in 11 patients and a lateral in 1. The mean number of preoperative surgical debridement procedures was 3.2, ranging from 1 to 9. RESULTS: all flaps survived. The most common etiological agent was S. aureus, in 54.5%. After a mean follow-up of 20.08 months (13 to 31), all patients show stable coverage without recurrence of infection signs or symptoms. CONCLUSION: gastrocnemius muscle use in knee infected injuries treatment presented good results and low morbity rates.

Knee injuries; Surgical flaps; Muscle skeletal


OBJETIVO: Avaliar prospectivamente o emprego do retalho do músculo gastrocnêmio no tratamento de lesões infectadas do joelho. MÉDOTOS: foram operados 12 pacientes, onze do sexo masculino, com idade variando de 19 a 78 anos, média de 55 anos. A cobertura com músculo gastrocnêmio medial foi realizada em 11 pacientes, e lateral em um. A média de desbridamentos pré-operatórios foi de 3,2 procedimentos, variando de um a nove. RESULTADOS: todos os retalhos sobreviveram. O agente etiológico mais comum foi o S. aureus, em 54,5%. Após seguimento médio de 20,08 meses (13 a 31), todos os pacientes apresentam cobertura estável sem sinais ou sintomas de reinfecção. CONCLUSÃO: a utilização do músculo gastrocnêmio no tratamento de lesões infectadas do joelho proporcionou bons resultados com baixa morbidade.

Lesões do joelho; Retalhos cirúrgicos; Músculo gastrocnêmio


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Use of gastrocnemius muscle on treatment of infected injuries of the knee

Fabiano Inácio de Souza; Arnaldo Valdir Zumiotti; Rames Mattar Junior; Teng Hsiang Wei; Marcelo Rosa de Resende; Luciano Ruiz Torres

Laboratory of Medical Investigation of the Musculoskeletal System - LIM41, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology - FMUSP

Correspondences to

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: to prospectively evaluate the use of gastrocnemius muscle flap in the treatment of knee infected injuries.

METHODS: twelve patients were operated on: eleven males with ages ranging from 19 to 78 years, mean: 55 years. Coverage of injuries with medial gastrocnemius muscle was accomplished in 11 patients and a lateral in 1. The mean number of preoperative surgical debridement procedures was 3.2, ranging from 1 to 9.

RESULTS: all flaps survived. The most common etiological agent was S. aureus, in 54.5%. After a mean follow-up of 20.08 months (13 to 31), all patients show stable coverage without recurrence of infection signs or symptoms.

CONCLUSION: gastrocnemius muscle use in knee infected injuries treatment presented good results and low morbity rates.

Keywords: Knee injuries. Surgical flaps. Muscle skeletal.

INTRODUCTION

Seriously infected injuries of the knee are complications resulting from various etiologies, requiring multidisciplinary approaches and have several therapeutic modalities.

The rates of infection after knee osteosynthesis are quite variable, because they depend on countless factors, such as presence of bone exposure, trauma energy, degree of contamination, time to surgery, associated comorbidities, etc.1 While after knee total arthroplasty (KTA), wound healing problems may occur in up to 22% of the cases2,3, with deep infection ranging from 1 to 12%.4,5

A careful study of patients with such severe injuries is warranted. For didactical reasons, they can be divided into local and systemic factors. Among local factors, we must assess wound's characteristics such as length, site, involved structures, appearance and amount of leakage, presence of osteomyelitis, osteosynthesis material or prosthesis exposure.

Clinically, risk factors such as multiple previous surgeries, rheumatoid arthritis, corticosteroids use, obesity, peripheral vascular disease, kidney failure, previous infection, tobacco use, alcohol abuse, pseudoarthrosis, radiation or immunosuppressive therapy are of great importance in these patients' prognosis.6

After debridement, these injuries must be appropriately covered. Several alternatives are available. In this study, we assess coverage with gastrocnemius muscle.

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively assess the use of gastrocnemius muscle flaps in the treatment of infected knee injuries.

METHODS

Between April 2002 and October 2003 twelve consecutive patients with infected knee injuries were operated at the Orthopaedics and Traumatology Institute of University of São Paulo's Hospital das Clínicas. ages ranged from 19 to 77 years (mean: 55). Eleven patients were males. (Table 1)

The surgical procedures were subdivided into two phases: debridement and injury coverage.

Debridement was performed in one or more procedures, in an attempt to obtain a clean, leakage-free wound, with no gross necrosis areas and reduced amount of fibrous tissue.

Injuries coverage was provided by rotating gastrocnemius muscle medially in 11 cases and laterally in one case, followed by skin grafting of the homolateral thigh. (Figure 1)


RESULTS

All flaps survived. In 11 cases, the etiological agent was identified as Staphylococcus aureus (54.5 %) the most common one. Other agents found were: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter cloacae, Enterococcus faecalis and Acinetobacter baumannii.

Among complications, the most frequent ones were suture dehiscence at donor area in two cases, debridement review in other two patients, preserving the flap. All patient evolved with no further complications.

Femorotibial arthrodesis was indicated in one case post knee total arthroplasty, because the patient had malnutrition, hypertension and diabetes, and presented with a spacer with antibiotics at admission (Figures 2 and 3)



After a mean follow-up time of 22.8 months, no patient showed signs or symptoms of new acute processes. The receptor area remains with a stable coverage, with no signs of new acute processes.

DISCUSSION

It is important to emphasize some relevant anatomical aspects of blood inflow on the anterior knee surface. Blood supply on this region is totally random, where multiple vessels contribute, predominantly emerging from terminal branches of the peripatellar arterial ring. This anastomotic ring is supplied by upper medial an lateral, lower medial and lateral genicular arteries, anterior recurrent tibial artery and deep femoral branches. On the other hand, the proximal knee surface does not count on effective perforating vessels, with blood flow in this area depending on the subdermal plexus, of which origin is located on the subcutaneous arteries.7-9 By knowing these peculiarities, potential healing delays, skin necrosis and infection can be minimized.10

Local factors characteristics must be well documented, such as degree of infiltration and contamination, presence of osteosynthesis material or prosthesis are important for a successful treatment plan.11 In all cases of post-KTA infection, prostheses (and one case with spacer with antibiotics) were removed, followed by debridement and flap rotation.

We must always ask about any chronic corticosteroid use, because several reports suggest an increased risk of complications on surgical wounds.7,12 These are assumed to be resultant from a reduced fibroblast proliferation, reduced collagenase clearance, resulting in a diminished collagen accumulation at wound site and subsequent tension forces reduction.10

Obese patients also show a stronger likelihood to complications, because additionally to the presence of potential metabolic changes, a more vigorous exposure of the surgical field may occur, increasing the risk of tissue devascularization.13

Malnutrition, briefly represented by albumin levels < 3.5g/dl and total lymphocyte count < 1,500 cell/mm3, has been associated to worse wound healing and rehabilitation delay.14

Nicotine, carbon monoxide and many other toxic substances found in a cigarette clearly interfere on tissue healing dynamics, increasing postoperative morbidity, due to angiogenesis reduction, oxygen carrying and use, microvascular injuries production, leukocyte, macrophage and fibroblast dysfunction, platelet depletion and epithelization delay.15

Patients with Diabetes mellitus show an increased incidence and severity of local and systemic complications resulting from metabolic changes, neuropathies and vasculopathies. Those rates can be extremely expressive after open fractures, with a rate of 64% local complications and up to 42% amputations.16

The risk of deep infections after elective knee surgeries, such as quadricepsplasty is very low, but always present.17 It is higher after open fractures, ranging from 0 to 87%, depending on several factors.1,18

After knee total arthroplasty, some wound healing complication may occur in up to 22% of the cases2,3, with infection rates ranging from 0.8 to 12.4%19, and, in our environment, from 0 to 6.0%.20

Achieving good results in the treatment of seriously infected knee injuries is directly proportional to the quality and effectiveness of surgical debridement. After achieving wounds with favorable appearance on soft parts and bone tissue, coverage becomes necessary. Several options are available: simple dressings6, negative-pressure dressings22, fasciocutaneous flaps23, pedicled muscle flaps11,24 or free muscle flaps25, with or without knee arthrodesis26, up to amputations.27

There is no algorithm able to clearly and safely outline one of these alternatives, once each case has its own peculiarities. Probably an orthopaedic doctor certified in reconstructive microsurgery can make a more accurate selection of the approach.

Thinking of a site with a high bacterial concentration, presence of cavitary injury, fibrous and necrotic tissue (even after effective debridement), microvascularization deficit compromising gas, nutrients and humor exchanges28, the body and antibiotics can hardly promote cure on such an injury.

Muscle flaps are intended to recreate a biological environment, isolating deep structures from the environment, reducing dead spaces, promoting local vascularization, increasing oxygen concentration, nutrients and metabolic exchanges, immunomediators transport and antibiotic concentration in loco.11,29

In very large injuries, microsurgical flaps can be used as an alternative, such as the abdominal rectus or major dorsal.11 In the great majority of cases, coverage of the anterior knee surface is achieved with pedicled flaps. The first choice is medial gastrocnemius rotation.30 It has a constant vascular pedicle, satisfactory length and width, great rotation range, its plasticity allows for closing without tension in most cases, is easy to dissect, and can be performed by most orthopaedic surgeons, in addition to low morbidity rate for donor aras.11,31

CONCLUSION

The use of gastrocnemius muscle in the treatment of infected knee injuries provided good results, showing to be a safe method and providing a satisfactory stabilization of soft parts coverage.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Khatod M, Botte MJ, Hoyt DB, Meyers RS, Smith JM, Akeson WH. Outcomes in open tibia fractures: relationship between delay in treatment and infection. J Trauma. 2003;55:949-54.
  • 2. Huo MH, Sculco TP. Complications in primary total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Rev. 1990;19:781-8.
  • 3. Siim E, Jakobsen IE, Medgyesis. Soft-tissue procedures for the exposed knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand. 1991;62:312-4.
  • 4. Johnson OP. Infection after knee arthroplaty. Acta Orthop Scand. 1993; 252:1-48.
  • 5. Windsor RE, Insall JN, Urss WK, Miller DV, Brause BD. Two-stage reimplantation for the salvage of total knee arthroplasty complicated by infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:272-8.
  • 6. Nahabedian MY, Mont MA, Orlando JC, Delanois RE, Hungerford DS. Operative Manegement and Outcome of Complex Wounds Following Total Knee Arthroplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104:1688-97.
  • 7. Klein NE, Cox CV. Wound problems in total knee arthroplaty. In: Fu FH, Harner CD, Vince K. Knee Surgery. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins;1994. p.1539-52.
  • 8. Craig SM. Soft tissue considerations in the failed total knee arthroplasty. In: Scott WN. The Knee. Orlando: Mosby; 1999. p.1279-95.
  • 9. Bjorkstrom S, Goldie IF. A study of the arterial supply of the patella in the normal state, in chondromalacia patellar and in osteoarthrosis. Acta Orthop Scand. 1980;51:63-70.
  • 10. Dennis DA. Wound complications in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 1997; 20:837-40.
  • 11. Markovich GD, Dorr LD, Klein NE, McPherson EJ, Vince KG. Muscle Flaps in Total Knee Arthroplaty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;321:122-30.
  • 12. Wicke C, Halliday B, Allen D, Roche NS, Schevenstuhl H, Spencer MM, Roberts AB, Hunt TK. Effects of steroids and retinoids on wound healing. Arch Surg. 2000;135:1265-70.
  • 13. Collins N. Obesity and wound healing. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2003;16:45-7.
  • 14. Rai J, Gill SS, Kumar BR. The influence of preoperative nutritional status in wound healing after replacement arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2002; 25:417-21.
  • 15. Krueger JK, Rohrich RJ. Clearing the smoke: the scientific rationale for tabacco abstention with plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:1063-73.
  • 16. Greenhalgh DG. Wound healing and Diabetes Mellitus. Clin Plast Surg. 2003;30:37-45.
  • 17. Konrath GA, Chen D, Lock T. Outcomes following repair of quadriceps tendon ruptures. J Orthop Trauma Am. 1998;12:273-9.
  • 18. Rademakers MV, Kerkhoffs GMMJ, Sierevelt IN, Raaymakers, ELFB, Marti RK. Intraarticular fractures of the distal femur: a long-term follow-up study of surgically treated patients. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18:213-9.
  • 19. Peersman G, Laskin R, Davis J, Peterson M. Infection in total knee replecement: a retrospective review of 6489 total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;(392):15-23.
  • 20. Queiroz AA, Luzo MVM. Tratamento das infecções nas artroplastias totais do joelho. Rev Bras Ortop. 1996;31:366-8.
  • 21. Wongworawat MD, Schnall SB, Holtom PD, Moo C, Schiller F. Negative pressure dressings as an alternative technique for the treatment of infected wounds. Clin Orth Relat Res. 2003;1(414):45-8.
  • 22. Menderes A, Demirdover C, Yilmaz M, Vayvada H, Barutcu A. Reconstruction of soft tissue defects following total arthroplasty. Knee 2002;9:215-9.
  • 23. Torii S, Namiki Y, Hayashi Y. Anterolateral leg island flap. Br J Plast Surg. 1987;40:236-40.
  • 24. Gerwin M, Rothaus KO, Windsor RE, Brause BD, Insall JN. Gastrocnemius muscle flap coverage of exposed or infected knee protheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;(286):64-70.
  • 25. Zumiotti AV, Teng HW, Ferreira MC. Osteomyelitis using microsurgical flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2003;19:163-71.
  • 26. Janet DC, Michael AM, Bezwada HP. Arthrodesis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:835-48.
  • 27. Sierra RJ, Trousdale RT, Pagnano MW. Above-the-knee amputation after a total knee replacement: prevalence, etiology and functional outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:1000-4.
  • 28. Russell RC, Graham DR, Feller AM, Zook EG, Mathur A. Experimental evaluation of the antibiotic carrying capacity of a muscle flap into a fibrotic cavity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;81:162-8.
  • 29. Mathes SJ, Alpert BS, Chang N. Use of the muscle flap in chronic osteomyelitis: experimental and clinical correlation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982;69:815-28.
  • 30. Hersh CK, Schenck RC, Wlilliams RP. The versality of the gastrocnemius muscle flap. J Orthop. 1995;24:218.
  • 31. Greenberg B, La Rossa D, Lotke PA, Murphy JB, Noone RB. Salvage of jeopardized total knee prosthesis: the role of the gastrocnemius muscle flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;83:85-9.
  • Endereço de Correspondência:

    Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
    8º andar, Rua Dr Ovídio Pires de Campos, 333, CEP:05403-010
    Email:
  • Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      11 Sept 2009
    • Date of issue
      2009

    History

    • Accepted
      10 Dec 2008
    • Received
      19 June 2009
    ATHA EDITORA Rua: Machado Bittencourt, 190, 4º andar - Vila Mariana - São Paulo Capital - CEP 04044-000, Telefone: 55-11-5087-9502 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
    E-mail: actaortopedicabrasileira@uol.com.br