SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.62 issue1Outcomes of patients with bone metastases from differentiated thyroid cancerAssociation of different biomarkers of renal function with D-dimer levels in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (renal biomarkers and D-dimer in diabetes) author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Print version ISSN 2359-3997On-line version ISSN 2359-4292

Arch. Endocrinol. Metab. vol.62 no.1 São Paulo Jan./Feb. 2018

https://doi.org/10.20945/2359-3997000000005 

Original Article

The relationship between of ACE I/D and the MTHFR C677T polymorphisms in the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus in a population of Brazilian obese patients

Flavio Fontes Pirozzi1  2  3 

Edis Belini Junior1 

Jessika Viviani Okumura1 

Mariana Salvarani1 

Claudia Regina Bonini-Domingos1 

Milton Artur Ruiz1  2 

1Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” (Unesp), São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brasil

2Associação Portuguesa de Beneficência, São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brasil

3Faculdade de Medicina União das Faculdades dos Grandes Lagos (Unilago), São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brasil


ABSTRACT

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the frequencies of the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) gene insertion/deletion (I/D) and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene C677T polymorphisms in obese patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Subjects and methods

These polymorphisms were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction in 125 patients with obesity, 47 (T2DM) and 78 (Control Group).

Results

No significant difference was found on comparing the T2DM and Control Groups in respect to the genotypic frequencies of the polymorphisms - (II: 13.3% vs. 12.0%; ID: 37.8% vs. 37.3; DD: 48.9% vs. 50.7%; CC: 36.2% vs. 39.0%; CT: 46.8% vs. 49.3%; TT: 17.0% vs. 11.7%), and alleles (I: 32.2% vs. 30.7%; D: 67.8% vs. 69.3%; C: 59.6% vs. 63.6%; T: 40.4% vs. 36.4%) and their synergisms in the pathophysiology of T2DM. On analyzing the T2DM Group, there were no significant differences in the presence of complications. In this population of Brazilian obese patients, no correlation was found between the ACE and MTHFR polymorphisms in the development of T2DM.

Conclusion

Analyzing only the group with diabetes, there was also no relationship between these polymorphisms and comorbidities.

Keywords Type 2 diabetes mellitus; obesity; angiotensin-converting enzyme gene; methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene; polymorphism

INTRODUCTION

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is considered a serious public health problem (1,2). Currently, there are about 415 million diabetics in the world, with more than 14 million in Brazil (3). In addition to the known environmental risk factors such as obesity, there are several genetic changes that are correlated to the pathophysiology of T2DM and its complications (4,5).

As in hypertension, some studies implicate angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) gene polymorphisms in the pathogenesis of T2DM, nephropathy and diabetic retinopathy (6,7). The relationship of MTHFR polymorphisms associated with hyperhomocysteinemia and changes in the folate cycle is unclear in respect to the development of T2DM with some studies linking these conditions with microvascular complications (8,9).

Epidemiological studies show the relationship of environmental factors in the development of T2DM in the Brazilian population, but few epidemiological studies show the relationship of this metabolic disease with genetic alterations in the same population (10,11), especially in respect to the polymorphisms of the ACE and MTHFR genes. This study aimed to evaluate the frequency of the insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism of the ACE gene and the C677T polymorphism of the MTHFR gene in a population of obese individuals with and without T2DM. Additionally, the association between these polymorphisms and the occurrence of T2DM and its complications were investigated.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Subjects

This study enrolled 125 obese adults, 47 with T2DM and 78 nondiabetic patients (Control Group) from June 2015 to November 2015. Inclusion criteria were male and female patients aged 18 to 65 with a body mass index (BMI) greater than or equal to 30 kg/m2. The Control Group was matched with respect to gender, BMI and ethnicity (Caucasian and Afro-Brazilian).

Individuals who had two fasting glucose measurements ≥ 126 mg/dL or glycemia levels ≥ 200 mg/dL two hours after ingesting 75g dextrosol or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥ 6.5% were considered diabetics according to the criteria of the American Diabetes Association (12). Moreover, patients who were already taking medication to treat diabetes (metformin, sulfonylureas, inhibitor of α-glucosidase, pioglitazone inhibitor, DDP-4, GLP-1 agonists, SGLT-2 inhibitors and insulin) were included in this group.

Microvascular complications, such as diabetic retinopathy (diagnosis by an ophthalmologist), diabetic nephropathy (microalbuminuria, macroalbuminuria or chronic renal failure) and diabetic neuropathy (according to clinical conditions, and physical examination) were also investigated in diabetic patients. Additionally, this study investigated whether the patients had previous diagnoses of hypertension, dyslipidemia or cardiovascular disease (myocardial infarction, stroke and peripheral arterial disease). This research was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Universidade Estadual Paulista “Julio de Mesquita Filho” (UNESP/IBILCE) in São José do Rio Preto, and followed the ethical principles stated in the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all participating individuals.

Sample collection

After fasting for 10 hours, 4 mL of peripheral blood were drawn by venipuncture of the upper limbs and placed into tubes containing 5% EDTA in order to extract DNA from leukocytes (13).

I/D polymorphism of the ACE gene

The investigation of the I/D polymorphism of 278 bp (rs1799752) in the ACE1 gene (17q23.3) was carried out by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using two amplifications with different primers. The first amplification used the ACE1 (sense) 5′CTGGAGACCACTCCCATCCTTTCT3′ and ACE2 (antisense)5′GATGTGGCCATCACATTCGTCAGAT3′ primers; the resulting insertion fragment has 490 bp and the deletion fragment has 190 bp. In this first amplification, there is a preference for the insertion allele to amplify as a deletion allele. Thus, samples homozygous for the deletion allele are submitted to a second amplification to identify heterozygous samples. In this second amplification, the ACE3 (sense) 5′TGGCACGACAGCGCCGCCCACTAC3′ and ACE4 (antisense) 5′TCGCCAGCCCTCCATGCCCATAAT3′ primers are used. The amplified insertion fragment has 355 bp and the deletion fragment is not amplified (14). Both amplifications were analyzed by 2.0% agarose gel electrophoresis under a constant current of 80V for 30 minutes and visualized under ultraviolet (UV) light after staining with ethidium bromide.

C677T polymorphism of the MTHFR gene

The PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) technique was used to investigate the C677T polymorphism (rs1801133) of the MTHFR gene. The MTHFR1 (sense) 5′TGAAGAAGGAGGTGTCTGCGG3′ and MTHFR2 (antisense) 5′AGGACGGTGCGGTGAGAGTG3′ primers were used for amplification generating a 198 bp fragment which was digested using the HinfI enzyme (G↓ANTC). The mutation creates a restriction site for the enzyme. The wild homozygous genotype (CC) gives a 198 bp band, the homozygous TT genotype has two bands – one of 175 bp and the other of 23 bp and the heterozygous genotype (CT) gives all three bands (198 bp, 175 bp and 23 bp) (15). The result was analyzed by 4.0% agarose gel electrophoresis under a constant current of 80V for 40 minutes and visualized under UV light after staining with ethidium bromide.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyzes were performed using the R program, version 3.2.3 (http://www.rproject.org) and p-values < 0.05 were considered significant. Quantitative variables, tested for normal distribution and homogeneity of variances, are expressed as means ± standard deviation. Mean scores between groups were compared using Student's t test and differences in proportions were evaluated using the Fisher exact test or Pearson chi-square test using the Rcmdr package (16). Allelic and genotypic frequencies and Hardy-Weinberg deviations were evaluated using the SNPassoc package (17). A binary logistic regression model was constructed to evaluate the association of polymorphisms in patients with T2DM in different genetic models of inheritance. The p-value was adjusted for variables using the same logistic regression model using the SNPassoc package (17).

RESULTS

Table 1 shows the characteristics of the obese, T2DM and nondiabetic Groups (Control Group). The T2DM Group had a mean age of 47.8 ± 8.8 years and the mean age of the Control Group was 41.6 ± 11.5 years (p-value = 0.02). There was no significant differences in relation to the gender or ethnicity.

Table 1 Demographic and clinical data of the study participants 

Characteristic T2DM (n = 47) Controls (n = 78) p-value
Age (mean ± SD) 47.8 (8.8) 41.6 (11.5) 0.020c
Male [n (%)] 17 (36.2) 19 (24.4) 0.157b
Female [n (%)] 30 (63.8) 59 (75.6)
Caucasian [n (%)] 39 (83.0) 62 (79.5) 0.631b
Afro-Brazilian [n (%)] 8 (17.0) 16 (20.5)
Obesity [n (%)]
Class I (BMI: 30 – 34.99) 23 (48.9) 43 (55.1)
Class II (BMI: 35 – 39.99) 13 (27.7) 24 (30.8) 0.416b
Class III (BMI: ≥ 40) 11 (23.4) 11 (14.1)
Retinopathy [n (%)] 3 (6.4) 0 < 0.05a
Nephropathy [n (%)] 7 (14.8) 0 < 0.05a
Neuropathy [n (%)] 7 (14.8) 0 < 0.05a
Hypertension [n (%)] 24 (51.1) 30 (38.5) 0.168b
Dyslipidemia [n (%)] 25 (53.2) 12 (15.4) < 0.05b
Cardiovascular disease [n (%)] 3 (6.4) 1 (1.3) 0.148a

T2DM: type 2 diabetes mellitus; SD: standard deviation

aFisher exact test;

bPearson chi-square test or chi-square goodness-of-fit test;

cStudent's t-test.

There were no statistical differences in the percentages of subjects with Class I, II and III obesity between the T2DM and Control Groups (p-value = 0.416). However, as noted in the general population, both groups had a higher proportion of patients with Class I obesity compared to Class II and III (p-value < 0.01) (18).

There was no significant difference between the two groups in respect to the number of individuals with hypertension and cardiovascular disease. However, the T2DM Group had a higher frequency of dyslipidemia compared to the Control Group. No patients in the Control Group had retinopathy, nephropathy or neuropathy due to other causes, thus the T2DM Group had more patients with these manifestations.

There was no statistically significant differences in the genotypic and allelic frequencies of the polymorphisms of the ACE and MTHFR genes between the T2DM and Control Groups (Table 2). Additionally, the genotypes of the polymorphisms evaluated showed no predisposition for elevated risk or protection against the development of T2DM.

Table 2 Genotypic and allelic frequencies of ACE I/D and MTHFR C667T polymorphisms in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and controls 

Genotype/Allele T2DM Controls OR (95% CI) p-value
ACE (rs1799752) (n = 45) (n = 75)
Genotype
II 6 (13.3) 9 (12.0) 0.87 (0.27-2.77)
ID 17 (37.8) 28 (37.3) 0.95 (0.43-2.12) 0.97
DD 22 (48.9) 38 (50.7) 1.00
Allele
I 29 (32.2) 46 (30.7) 0.93 (0.53-1.63) 0.88
D 61 (67.8) 104 (69.3)
MTHFR (rs1801133) (n = 47) (n = 77)
Genotype
CC 17 (36.2) 30 (39.0) 1.0
CT 22 (46.8) 38 (49.3) 0.98 (0.44-2.16) 0.71
TT 8 (17.0) 9 (11.7) 0.64 (0.21-1.96)
Allele
C 56 (59.6) 98 (63.6) 0.84 (0.49-1.42) 0.59
T 38 (40.4) 56 (36.4)

95% CI: 95% confidence interval.

Different models of gene inheritance were evaluated to check any predisposition for elevated risk or protection against T2DM by comparing the two groups. The results are shown in Table 3, and according to the findings, none of the analyzed inheritance models (codominant, dominant, recessive and additive log) have any influence on the development of T2DM in this obese population.

Table 3 Analysis of the association of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with ACE I/D and MTHFR C677T gene polymorphisms in different models of inheritance 

Model Genotype T2DM Controls OR (95% IC) p-value
ACE (rs1799752) n = 45 n = 75
Codominant II 6 (13.3) 9 (12.0) 0.87 (0.27-2.77) 0.97
ID 17 (37.8) 28 (37.3) 0.95 (0.43-2.12)
DD 22 (48.9) 38 (50.7) 1.00
Dominant DD 22 (48.9) 38 (50.7) 1.00 0.85
ID-II 23 (51.1) 37 (49.3) 0.93 (0.44-1.95)
Recessive II 6 (13.3) 9 (12.0) 1.00 0.83
DD-ID 39 (86.7) 66 (88.0) 0.89 (0.29-2.68)
Additive log ----- ------- ------ 0.94 (0.55-1.59) 0.81
MTHFR (rs1801133) n = 47 n = 77
Codominant CC 17 (36.2) 30 (39.0) 1.0 0.71
CT 22 (46.8) 38 (49.4) 0.98 (0.44-2.16)
TT 8 (17.0) 9 (11.7) 0.64 (0.21-1.96)
Dominant CC 17 (36.2) 30 (39.0) 1.0 0.76
CT-TT 30 (63.8) 47 (61.0) 0.89 (0.42-1.88)
Recessive TT 8 (17.0) 9 (11.7) 0.65 (0.23-1.81) 0.41
CC-TT 39 (83.0) 68 (88.3) 1.00
Additive log ----- ------- ------ 0.84 (0.49-1.43) 0.52

95% CI: 95% confidence interval.

Different combinations of polymorphisms in the T2DM and Control Groups were evaluated in relation to possible synergism between the polymorphisms to check any predisposition for elevated risk or protection against T2DM. Significant differences between groups were not found with any combination of polymorphisms (Table 4).

Table 4 Association analysis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using combinations of polymorphisms (ACE I/D and MTHFR C667T) 

Combination T2DM (n = 45) Controls (n = 74) OR (95% IC) p-value
DD/CC 8 (17.8) 15 (20.3) 0.85 (0.33-2.20) 0.74
DD/CT 12 (26.7) 18 (24.3) 1.13 (0.48-2.64) 0.77
DD/TT 2 (4.4) 5 (6.8) 0.64 (0.12–3.45) 0.63
ID/CC 7 (15.6) 9 (12.2) 1.31 (0.45-3.86) 0.59
ID/CT 7 (15.6) 15 (20.3) 0.72 (0.27-1.94) 0.52
ID/TT 3 (8.8) 3 (3.5) 2.46 (0.51-13.81) 0.35
II/CC 1 (2.2) 5 (6.8) 0.31 (0.03-2.77) 0.41
II/CT 2 (4.5) 3 (4.0) 1.14 (0.18-7.12) 0.89
II/TT 3 (36.2) 1 (39.0) 5.2 (0.53-51.74) 0.15

95% CI: 95% confidence interval.

The number of individuals with T2DM as well as microvascular complications (retinopathy, nephropathy or diabetic neuropathy) or other diseases related to metabolic syndrome such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, and cardiovascular diseases was small and no statistically significant difference was found in relation to polymorphisms of the ACE and MTHFR genes.

DISCUSSION

Brazil has one of the highest number of obese and diabetic patients in the world but few epidemiological studies exist, especially related to the association of genetic polymorphisms with this disease and its complications (3,10,11,18). Two groups of obese patients, with and without T2DM, were matched with respect to gender, BMI and ethnicity (Caucasian and Afro-Brazilian). The main objective of this study was to evaluate the frequency of polymorphisms (ACE I/D and MTHFR C677T) and their influence on the pathophysiology of T2DM and microvascular complications in individuals with a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2.

According to the findings of this study, the ACE I/D and MTHFR C677T polymorphisms are not involved in the development of T2DM in this population. Studies had previously correlated these polymorphisms, especially the I/D polymorphism of the ACE gene, with T2DM (4-9) even in Indian women with gestational diabetes (19). These polymorphisms have also been implicated in the development of microvascular complications linked to diabetes (20-22). However, studies in Caucasian populations show no significant relationship with the polymorphism of the ACE gene (23). Although the Brazilian population is multiethnic, most of the participants of this study (80.8%) were Caucasians, which supports this finding.

Recent studies point to a synergism between different polymorphisms as the triggering factor for diseases that have a genetic component in their pathogenesis, such as T2DM. Although some studies point to this effect on the development of diabetes, including synergism between the ACE I/D and MTHFR C677T polymorphisms (24), our study found no significant difference between the patients and controls. Moreover, in the group of patients with T2DM, we did not find significant differences in the analysis of these polymorphisms in relation to microvascular complications and comorbidities such as hypertension, dyslipidemia and cardiovascular disease.

One study reported a higher frequency of the D allele in patients with T2DM and cardiovascular disease and the DD genotype had higher risk for these individuals to present with a cardiovascular event (25). Another study in patients with coronary artery disease, with and without diabetes, showed that the DD genotype is associated with poor coronary collateral circulation, which implies worse ischemic conditioning during acute myocardial infarction (26). The frequencies of the D allele and the DD genotype of the ACE gene were higher in both groups pointing to an increased cardiovascular risk probably due to obesity and not T2DM. However, these results should be interpreted with caution, as the numbers of individuals previously diagnosed with cardiovascular disease was very small in both groups.

One study of a cohort of Brazilian subjects did not find any association between the I/D polymorphism of the ACE gene and patients with T2DM and metabolic syndrome according to the criteria of the World Health Organization (27), and there are no studies reporting the risk of individuals with this polymorphism developing diabetes. Although there is a Brazilian study that correlates homocysteine levels in patients with and without T2DM to the polymorphism of the MTHFR gene (28), there are no studies showing any association of this gene with the risk of developing diabetes in the same population.

Even with the two matched groups, despite the higher age in the T2DM group and more patients with hypertension (not statistically significant) and dyslipidemia (with statistical significance) compared to the Control Group, the number of participants was small in this study and because only patients with obesity were selected, this evaluation did not include overweight patients with metabolic problems.

In conclusion, no association was found between the polymorphisms of the ACE and MTHFR genes and the development of T2DM in this population. Additionally, no evidence of synergism between the polymorphisms of these two genes and the emergence of diabetes was found. Our group did not find any relationship of polymorphisms of the ACE and MTHFR genes with microvascular complications and diseases associated to the metabolic syndrome (hypertension, dyslipidemia and cardiovascular diseases) in the group of T2DM patients. This is the first multiethnic Brazilian population study to evaluate polymorphisms of the ACE and MTHFR genes in obese individuals but our cohort is too small to confirm the data in view of the heterogeneity of the Brazilian population.

REFERENCES

1. Tracey ML, Glimartin M, O'Neill K, Fitzgerald AP, McHugh SM, Buckley CM, et al. Epidemiology of diabetes and complications among adults in the Republic of Ireland 1998-2015: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:132. [ Links ]

2. Borges NB, Ferraz MB, Chacra AR. The cost of type 2 diabetes in Brazil: evaluation of a diabetes care center in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2014;6(1):122. [ Links ]

3. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Altas – Seventh Edition, 2015. [ Links ]

4. Khodaeian M, Enayati S, Tabatabaei-Malazy O, Amoli MM. Association between genetic variants and diabetes mellitus in Iranian populations: a systematic review of observational studies. J Diabetes Res. 2015;2015:585917. [ Links ]

5. Abbas S, Raza ST, Ahmed F, Ahmad A, Rizvi S, Mahdi F. Association of genetic polimorphism of PPARy-2, ACE, MTHFR, FABP-2 and FTO genes in risk prediction of type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Biomed Sci. 2013;20:80. [ Links ]

6. Daimon M, Oizumi T, Saitoh T, Kameda W, Hirata A, Yamaguchi H, et al. The D allele of angiotensin converting enzime insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism is a risk factor for type 2 diabetes in a population-based Japanese sample. Endocrine J 2003;50:393-8. [ Links ]

7. Ha SK. ACE insertion/deletion polymorphism and diabetic nephrophaty: clinical implications of genetic information. J Diabetes Res. 2014;2014:846068. [ Links ]

8. Zhong JH, Rodríguez AC, Yang NN, Li LQ. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphism and the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e74521. [ Links ]

9. Yang S, Zhang J, Feng C, Huang G. MTHFR C677T variant contributes to diabetic nephropathy risk in a Caucasian individuals with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Metabolism. 2013;62(4):586-94. [ Links ]

10. Da-Mata FA, Galvao TF, Pereira MG, Silva MT. Prevalence of selfreported diabetes and its associated factors: a population-based study in Brazil. Int J Endocrinol. 2015;2015:610790. [ Links ]

11. Domingos AC, Iacida EC, de Oliveira RM, Bonini-Domingos CR, de Mattos CC, de Mattos LC. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and the frequency of the G22A polymorphism of the adenosine deaminase gene in a mixed population in Brazil. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2014;108(7):439-43. [ Links ]

12. American Diabetes Association. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(Suppl1):S13-22. [ Links ]

13. Sambrook J, Fritcsh EF, Manatis T. Molecular Cloning: a laboratory manual. 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1989. [ Links ]

14. Rigat B, Hubert C, Alhenc-Gelas F, Cambien F, Corvol P, Soubrier F. An insertion/deletion polymorphism in the angiotensin I-converting enzyme gene accounting for half the variance of serum enzyme levels. J Clin Invest. 1990;86(4):1343-6. [ Links ]

15. Frosst P, Blom HJ, Milos R, Goyette P, Sheppard CA, Matthews RG, et al. A candidate genetic risk factor for vascular disease: a common mutation in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase. Nat Genet. 1995;10(1):111-3. [ Links ]

16. Fox, J. The R Commander: A Basic Statistics Graphical User Interface to R. J. Stat. Softw. 2005;14(9):1-42. [ Links ]

17. González JR, Armengol L, Solé X, Guinó E, Mercader JM, Estivill X, et al. SNPassoc: an R package to perform whole genome association studies. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(5):644-5. [ Links ]

18. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Trends in adult bodymass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: a pooled analysis of 1698 population-based measurement studies with 19,2 million participants. Lancet. 2016;387(10026):1377-1396. [ Links ]

19. Aqqarwal P, Agarwal N, Das N, Dalal K. Association of polymorphisms in angiotensin-converting enzyme gene with gestacional diabetes mellitus in Indian women. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2016;6(1):31-7. [ Links ]

20. Xu W, Qian Y, Zhao L. Angiotensin-converting enzyme I/D polymorphism is a genetic biomarker of diabetic peripheral neurophathy: evidence from a meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(1):944-8. [ Links ]

21. Ma H, Yu C, Wang R. Association of ACE polymorphisms and diabetic nephropathy susceptibility. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(2):2962-5. [ Links ]

22. Yigit S, Karakus N, Inanir A. Association of MTHFR gene C677T mutation with diabetic peripheral neuropathy and diabetic retinopathy. Mol Vis. 2013;19:1626-30. [ Links ]

23. Arfa I, Abid A, Nouira S, Elloumi-Zghal H, Malouche D, Mannai I, et al. Lack of association between the angiotensin converting enzyme gene (I/D) polymorphism and diabetic nephropatic in Tunisian type 2 diabetic patients. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2008;9(1):32-6. [ Links ]

24. Al-Harbi EM, Farid EM, Gumaa KA, Darwish AH, Alenizi M, Singh J. Genetic combination of angiotensin-converting enzyme with methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphisms and the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Bahrain. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2015;16(1):172-7. [ Links ]

25. Lei HP, Chen HM, Zhong SL, Yao QZ, Tan HH, Yang M, et al. Association between polymorphisms of the renin- angiotensin system and coronary artery disease in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2012;13(2):305-13. [ Links ]

26. Ceyhan K, Kadi H, Celik A, Burucu T, Koc F, Soqut E, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme DD polymorphism is associated with poor coronary collateral circulation in patients with coronary artery disease. J Investig Med. 2012;60(1):49-55. [ Links ]

27. Costa LA, Canani LH, Maia AL, Gross JL. The ACE insertion/deletion polymoprhism ins not associated with the metabolic syndrome (WHO definition) in Brazilian type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2012;25(12):2365-6. [ Links ]

28. Mello AL, Cunha SF, Foss-Freitas MC, Vannucchi H. Evaluation of plasma homocysteine level according to the C677T and A1298C polymorphism of the enzyme MTHFR in type 2 diabetic adults. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol 2012;56(7):429-34. [ Links ]

Received: July 07, 2016; Accepted: June 07, 2017

Correspondence to: Flavio Fontes Pirozzi, Rua Delegado Pinto de Toledo, 2820, ap. 111 15010-080 – São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brasil fpirozzi@hotmail.com

Disclosure: no potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Creative Commons License This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.