SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.63 issue5Thyroid nodules ≤ 1 cm and papillary thyroid microcarcinomas: Brazilian experts opinionLong-term outcome after bilateral adrenalectomy in Cushing’s disease with focus on Nelson’s syndrome author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Print version ISSN 2359-3997On-line version ISSN 2359-4292

Arch. Endocrinol. Metab. vol.63 no.5 São Paulo Sept./Oct. 2019  Epub Sep 02, 2019

http://dx.doi.org/10.20945/2359-3997000000168 

original articles

Active surveillance in papillary thyroid carcinoma: not easily accepted but possible in Latin America

1Division of Endocrinology, Hospital de Clinicas, University of Buenos Aires Buenos Aires, Argentina

ABSTRACT

Objectives

To determine the percentage of patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) who accepted active surveillance as an alternative to surgery in our clinical practice and to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with Bethesda category V and VI thyroid nodules who chose active surveillance.

Subjects and methods

We included 136 PTC patients from the Hospital de Clínicas, University of Buenos Aires without (i) US extrathyroidal extension, (ii) tumors adjacent to the recurrent laryngeal nerve or trachea, and/or (iii) US regional lymph-node metastasis or clinical distant metastasis. PTC progression was defined as the presence of i) a tumor larger than ≥ 3 mm, ii) novel appearance of lymph-node metastasis, and iii) serum thyroglobulin doubling time in less than one year. For patients with these features, surgery was recommended.

Results

Only 34 (25%) of 136 patients eligible for active surveillance accepted this approach, and around 10% of those who accepted abandoned it due to anxiety. The frequency of patients with tumor enlargement was 17% after a median of 4.6 years of follow-up without any evidence of nodal or distant metastases. Ten patients who underwent surgical treatment after a median time of 4 years of active surveillance (AS) had no evidence of disease after a median of 3.8 years of follow-up after surgery.

Conclusion

Although not easily accepted in our cohort of patients, AS would be safe and easily applicable in experienced centers.

Key words: Thyroid cancer; observation; active surveillance; low-risk

INTRODUCTION

Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is the most common endocrine malignancy, accounting for about 1% of all cancers (1). An exponential increase in its incidence has been demonstrated over the last decade (2). However more than 50% of this increase is linked to the identification of intrathyroidal papillary microcarcinomas (PMCs) (3). The origin of this upward trend in the incidence of PMCs has not been elucidated, possibly due to the wider use of diagnostic imaging technology combined with greater access to health care and patients’ improved socioeconomic conditions (4,5). Most PTCs are non-palpable, and their diagnosis arises from ultrasonographic incidental findings or from the anatomopathological study of removed thyroid glands due to benign pathology (3,6). If never diagnosed and treated, most of these PMCs would remain stable without influencing overall survival, as shown in several autopsy studies, which revealed a prevalence of PMCs ranging from 4.2 to 35.6% (7-9). On the other hand, several authors warned about the medical costs of thyroid cancer treatment, which might expand to US$ 3.5 billion by 2030 in the United States (10).

At the moment, the therapeutic approach for patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma should be individualized to differentiate patients who will benefit from a more aggressive therapy from those who may require a conservative approach (11). In this last group of patients, observation instead of immediate surgery emerges as a valid option.

Akira Miyauchi was the first investigator to propose active surveillance for patients with PMC, based on the fact that a small minority of these PMCs might progress (12). This researcher hypothesized that most PMCs remain latent without progression or with very slow progression, so it would not be harmful to delay surgery until diagnosis of significant size enlargement or development of nodal metastasis (13). This active surveillance strategy entailed performing neck ultrasound examinations every 6 to 12 months, and progression was defined as an increase in tumor diameter of 3 mm or more and/or the identification of lymph node/distant metastasis during the follow-up (12).

The first active surveillance study of PMCs was published in 2003, and it showed that tumor size remained stable or decreased compared to the baseline in more than 70% of the patients (12). The same and other researchers later confirmed these data (14-21). Additionally, Tuttle and cols. observed similar results in tumors up to 1.5 cm in size, a situation that supports active surveillance as a valid follow-up alternative (14).

However, this alternative’s applicability in patients with a diagnosis of PMCs needs to be evaluated considering the various scenarios, which usually include i) a medical team likely to follow this new approach, ii) patients who accept this strategy, and iii) a radiologist who knows what must be considered from each image study during the follow-up.

Due to the absence of any published experience in Latin America, the aim of this study was i) to determine the percentage of patients with PTC who accepted active surveillance as an alternative to surgery in our clinical practice and ii) to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with Bethesda category V and VI thyroid nodules who underwent active surveillance at the Hospital de Clínicas at the University of Buenos Aires.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

We evaluated 136 patients with a diagnosis of PCMs eligible for active surveillance who attended our hospital before the indication of a surgical treatment.

Inclusion criteria were i) the presence of a single thyroid nodule classified as PTC (Bethesda category VI) or suspicious for PTC (Bethesda category V) (22); ii) tumor size of 1.5 cm or less in maximal diameter at diagnosis; iii) no clinical or radiographic evidence of extrathyroidal extension, invasion of local structures, or regional (N1) or distant metastases (M1); and iv) undetectable serum calcitonin levels.

Patients who did not meet the previously described criteria but had a high surgical risk or refused to be operated on were also included.

Follow-up

Patients’ follow-ups included thyroid and neck ultrasonography examinations and assessment of serum TSH and thyroglobulin (Tg) and anti-thyroglobulin antibodies (TgAb) levels every 6 months. All patients had to follow-up for at least 6 months.

Patients with posterior tumors near the trachea or esophagus or located along the course of the recurrent laryngeal nerves or carotid were excluded.

Prospective active surveillance was considered when diagnosis of PTC was made at the beginning of follow-up and retrospectively when cytological diagnosis of Bethesda categories V and VI was established after surveillance of a single thyroid nodule that grew since a previous ultrasonographic follow-up.

Serum Tg levels were measured by an electrochemiluminescent method (ECLIA), Elecsys 2010 (Roche) with an analytical sensitivity of 0.04 ng/mL and functional sensitivity of 0.1 ng/mL. TgAb levels were measured by an electrochemiluminescent method, Elecsys Anti-Tg (Roche); values > 20 IU/mL were considered positive. Serum TSH was measured with a commercialized chemiluminescence assay kit (Siemens Advia Centaur® XPT TSH3-UL) (reference range of 0.35 to 5.5 mU/l).

Additionally, the same operator performed a neck ultrasound with a linear 11 MHz transducer every six months.

Indication of surgery

Surgery was recommended if i) the primary tumor grew 3 mm or more in the greatest dimension from the baseline in less than one year, ii) the greater diameter was larger than 1.5 cm during any moment of the follow-up, ii) serum Tg doubling time less than one year, or iii) evidence emerged of extrathyroidal extension, nodal or distant metastasis.

Evaluation after surgery

Each patient was stratified after surgery with the modified 2015 ATA risk stratification system (low, intermediate, or high risk of recurrence) (23), which identified the mortality risk according to the eighth edition of the AJCC/UICC staging system (TNM Stage) (24). Patients were re-stratified according to their responses to therapy assessment compared to the previously published definitions (excellent response, indeterminate response, biochemical incomplete response, or structural incomplete response to therapy) (23,25).

Our hospital’s Ethical Committee approved the present study. All the participants provided written informed consent for data collection and tumor acquisition.

Statistical analysis

Continuous data were presented as means (SDs) or medians (ranges) and interquartile range, as appropriate for each variable. Percentage change in size was calculated relative to the baseline estimated in ultrasound at diagnosis. A meaningful change in tumor size was defined as an increase greater than 3 mm from baseline before the initial fine-needle aspiration. The values obtained were compared using Chi2 for categorical variables and a t test for comparison of two means for continuous variables with normal distribution. The statistical tests used to compare the differences between the groups were the Mann-Whitney U test for skewed variables and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired skewed variables. All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS, 24.0 version (IBM Corp).

RESULTS

Of 136 eligible patients offered the alternative of active surveillance, only 34 (25%) decided to undergo this approach. All patients who chose immediate surgery expressed anxiety about disease progression and uncertainty about identification of regional or distant metastases with continued observation. Therefore, a total of 34 patients with PTC smaller than 1.5 cm in diameter (Bethesda category VI) or suspicious for PTC (Bethesda category V) were included in the study. The mean follow-up was 48.8 ± 29.6 months (median, 42 months [range, 7-120 months]). Active surveillance was adopted due to i) the patient´s election to be monitored with observational management (n = 31; 91%), ii) high surgical risk (n = 2; 6%), and iii) surgical issues that needed to be addressed prior to the thyroid surgery (n = 1, 3%).

Baseline characteristics of patients included in the study are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of included patients 

Variable Patients with stable tumors (n = 28) Patients with tumor increased (> 3 mm) (n = 6)
Age at diagnosis, y
Median (range) 41 (15-79) 42 (26-79.7)
<60 y.o. (n) 30 (88) 5 (83)
Sex, n (%)
Female 29 (85) 6 (100)
Male 5 (15) 0
Citology, n (%)
Bethesda category V 10 (30) 1 (17)
Bethesda category VI 24 (70) 5 (83)
Surveillance modality (%)
Prospective 24 (70) 4 (67%)
Retrospective 10 (30) 2 (33%)
Extent of active surveillance (months)
Median (range) 42 (7-120) 41,8 (24-84)
Tumor size (%) ≤ 1 cm 1.1-1.5 cm 24 (70) 10 (30) 1 (17) 5 (83)
History of autoimmune thyroid disease, n (%)
None 19 (56) 5 (83)
Autoimmune thyroiditis 13 (38) 1 (17)
Subacute thyroiditis 1 (3) 0
Graves’ disease 1 (3) 0
TSH levels (mUI/mL)
Median (range) 0.63 (0.52-1.5) 1.03 (0.8-1.2)
Levothyroxine treatment (%)
Yes 36 0
No 64 100

SD: standard deviation; n: number of patients; TSH: thyrotrophin.

Active surveillance was prospective in 70% (n = 24) of patients with cytological diagnosis at the beginning of follow-up, and in the remaining 30% (n = 10), active surveillance was initially performed retrospectively, with the diagnosis of a PTC by FNAB after a mean of 69.9 ± 34.15 months of follow-up of a solitary thyroid nodule by neck ultrasonography. In this group, 50% (n = 5/10) of patients underwent surgery at the moment of inclusion, and the other 50% continued with a prospective active surveillance (n = 5/10) (Figure 1).

PTC: papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Figure 1 Graphical explanation of the concept of retrospective surveillance. 

The median tumor size of the whole cohort was 9.20 mm ± 2.95 mm at diagnosis and 9.66 mm ± 3.10 mm at the end of follow-up or at the moment of surgery (p = NS). Tumor diameter growth of 3 mm or more was observed in 17% (n = 6), and 74% (n = 25) did not exhibit significant changes during follow-up. Additionally, 9% (n = 3) of patients showed a decrease in size of more than 3 mm (Figure 2).

Figure 2 Percentage of change in tumor size (more or less than 3 mm) during active surveillance for each patient. 

It was not possible to identify a differential feature that was linked to tumor progression between groups. Although the majority of tumors that increased in size were larger than 1 cm, reliable conclusions about this trend cannot be obtained given the small number of patients who experienced tumor growth. The latter group’s characteristics are summarized in Table 1.

Mean and median serum Tg baseline levels were 34.84 ± 80.41 ng/ml and 7.5 ng/ml (0.2-320 ng/mL), respectively. Tg levels greater than 100 ng/ml were observed in two patients (5%) (106 ng/mL and 172 ng/mL, respectively), and only one patient showed a doubling time shorter than one year during follow-up.

At the time of writing this manuscript, four patients who experienced tumor growth were still under active surveillance, with no clinical or radiological evidence of extrathyroidal extension, lymph node, or distant metastases.

The clinical outcomes of the 102 patients who refused active surveillance can be observed in Table 2.

Table 2 Clinical outcomes of 102 patients who refused to undergo active surveillance and received surgery* during the first three months after the diagnosis of a papillary thyroid microcarcinoma 

Initial response Response at the end of follow-up (median 32.6 months [12-56])

NED IR BIR SIR
Total (n = 102/136) ER (n = 69,68%) 98,5% (n = 68) 1,5% (n = 1)
IR (n = 29, 28%) 55,1% (n = 16) 44,9% (n = 13)
BIR (n = 1, 2%) 100% (n = 1)
SIR (n = 1, 2%) 50 % (n = 1) 50 % (n = 1)

* Total thyroidectomy in 80 patients and hemithyroidectomy in 22 patients.

ER: excellent response; IR: indeterminate response; BIR: biochemical incomplete response; SIR: structural incomplete response; NED: no evidence of disease.

Outcomes in patients who switched from active surveillance to surgery

Surgery was performed on 29% (n = 10) of patients. In this group, 50% (n = 5) decided to undergo surgery during the prospective observation, and in the other half (n = 5), the indication of surgery was given at the moment of study inclusion due to the presence of a tumor with a diameter near 15 mm in a retrospective surveillance background, as previously explained. In the latter scenario, a patient with a single 15-mm nodule was included, in which the diagnosis of PTC was obtained after 108 months of follow-up of a thyroid nodule with negative FNAB result previously performed.

Only two patients underwent surgery due to an increase in tumor diameter of 3 mm or more in the greatest dimension over baseline. Eight patients decided to undergo surgery despite no increase in tumor size. Among them, 3 patients returned to the clinic having undergone thyroidectomy for anxiety-related issues, representing 9% of the total cohort. For one additional patient, surgery was indicated after the observation of a doubling of serum Tg level in six months (from 172 ng/mL to 320 ng/mL) associated with a posterior tumor localization adjacent to the trachea, for whom active surveillance was previously agreed upon due to a high surgical risk (Figures 3 and 4).

Figure 3 Causes of surgery despite no increase in tumor size 

(A) Eleven mm PTC with posterior localization adjacent to the trachea and duplication of Tg serum levels in less than one year. Active surveillance was previously agreed due to a high surgical risk. The patient underwent surgery after 12 months of follow-up with a low risk of recurrence tumor and an excellent response to treatment after 32 months of follow-up; (B-D) Markedly hypoechoic thyroid nodules with macro and microcalcifications and irregular margins (Bethesda category VI). Tumor size remained stable under active surveillance (12, 5 and 12 mm respectively) after 84, 30 and 53 months, respectively.

Figure 4 Ultrasonographic images of selected patients with PTC undergoing active surveillance. 

The majority of patients who decided to undergo surgery preferred total thyroidectomy even though lobectomy was offered as the ideal approach.

Ninety percent of the patients who received surgery were women, and the mean age at diagnosis of the PTC was 41.27 ± 11.9 years old. The median tumor size was 11.6 ± 2.69 mm at the beginning of active surveillance and 11.7 ± 2.72 mm before the surgical procedure (p = NS) after a mean follow-up of 56.2 ± 38.2 months (median, 45 months [range, 12-120 months]). All of these patients were classified as harboring a low risk of recurrence and TNM stage I. Seven patients (70%) had an excellent initial response to treatment, and one showed of the following responses: biochemical incomplete, indeterminate, and structural incomplete (representing 10% each).

The patient who presented a structural incomplete response to treatment received a central neck compartment dissection one year after total thyroidectomy. No patient showed evidence of disease at the end of follow-up (median, 46.4 months [range, 6-89 months]) (Table 3).

Table 3 Characteristics of the patients who underwent surgery 

Surgery Age (y) Histology T (cm) N M TNM stage RR Initial response Response at the end of follow-up (median 46.4 m, 6-80)
TT 46.9 CPTC 0.9 0 0 I Low Excellent NED
HT 37.5 CPTC 1.1 1a 0 I Low Structural incomplete NED
TT 65.5* CPTC 1.1 0 0 I Low Biochemical incomplete NED
TT 24.2 CPTC 1.5 0 0 I Low Excellent NED
TT 44.3 CPTC 0.8 1a 0 I Low Excellent NED
TT 32,3 CPTC 1.5 0 0 I Low Indeterminate NED
TT 40,4 CPTC 0,7 0 0 I Low Excellent NED
TT 55,5 CPTC 1,1 0 0 I Low Excellent NED
TT 26,6 CPTC 9 0 0 I Low Excellent NED
TT 40 FVPTC 1,5 0 0 I Low Excellent NED

TT: total thyroidectomy; HT: hemithyroidectomy; T: tumor; N: node involvement; M: distant metastasis; RR: risk of recurrence; CPTC: classical papillary thyroid carcinoma; FVPTC: follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma; NED: no evidence of disease.

* Patient who presented a serum Tg doubling time of 6 months with a posterior PMC adjacent to the trachea.

DISCUSSION

As a follow-up strategy, active surveillance has been initially proposed in patients with localized low-risk prostate cancer, with the intention of delaying active treatment until the tumor revealed a significant progression, thus avoiding the side effects of previously proposed treatments (26). This approach can also be used in patients with slow-growing tumors, such as thyroid cancer, as several authors have shown (12-21). According to the 2015 American Thyroid Association Guidelines (23) for the treatment and follow-up of patients with thyroid cancer, active surveillance can be considered an alternative to immediate surgery in various situations: i) in very low-risk papillary microcarcinomas with no clinical or radiographic evidence of histologically adverse features, such as extrathyroidal extension, lymphovascular invasion, or metastatic lymph node involvement; ii) when no aggressive cytological variants of thyroid cancer are present; iii) in patients at high surgical risk because of comorbid conditions; iv) in patients expected to have a relatively short remaining life span (e.g., serious cardiopulmonary disease, other malignancies, very advanced age); and v) inpatients with concurrent medical or surgical issues that need to be addressed prior to thyroid surgery (23,27). The literature supports this approach as a safe and effective alternative to immediate surgery in properly selected patients (14-21).

In our study, it was surprising that only 25% of patients with a diagnosis of a PTC candidate for active surveillance accepted this modality as an alternative. To our knowledge, no other studies address the difficulty of implementing active surveillance, but it seems it is currently not an option most patients consider, at least in our country (28,29).

To date, reliable molecular features that can differentiate the small number of patients who will clinically progress under active surveillance have not been yet defined (30). Therefore, additional studies are needed to identify the specific risk factors that lead patients to choose surgery instead of active surveillance and to define the systematic follow-up process to establish frequency of neck ultrasound examinations, optimal serum TSH cutoff, and the potential role of serum Tg during surveillance, among others. Additionally, significant complications of thyroid surgery could also lead patients to choose active surveillance (19,31-33). The rate of permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis and permanent hypoparathyroidism was reported as high as 10% and 7.1%, respectively. Together, they can reach up to 35% (32). Such surgical complications can be avoided if observation is chosen as the first line of management (19,27,31,33).

The adequate management of patients with PTC under active surveillance requires the availability of an experienced multidisciplinary management team and high-quality neck ultrasounds (14). The lack of accuracy in measurements of tumor size might affect treatment-decision making and final outcomes. In relation to tumor kinetics, our results are consistent with previous studies conducted in Japan and United States (14-21). Tumor diameter growth of 3 mm or more from baseline during the first years of active surveillance was observed in about 17% of the patients because we included patients with a retrospective follow-up (see before). Small PTCs up to 1.5 cm in diameter, even above the traditional 1-cm cutoff, showed a similarly low likelihood of growth, and a small percentage of patients experienced tumor regression (14). This last phenomenon might occur due to local immune mechanisms and/or necrosis, triggered by FNAB’s traumatic effect on the intratumoral cell population (14,20). On the other hand, none of our patients experienced loco-regional metastases, distant metastasis, or specific death during active surveillance (14-21). As in previous investigations, the patients in our cohort who experienced an increase in tumor size were under 60 years old, with a mean age of 45.86 ± 17.3 years (14,17,19). This subgroup of patients had TSH levels in the lower part of the reference range without hormone replacement therapy, not supporting the association theory regarding elevated serum TSH levels and increased tumor volume in the first 2 years of follow-up (34). Increased serum Tg levels were observed in 5% of patients. However, none of them showed an increase in tumor diameter. Until now, no conclusive studies had been conducted on the prognostic value of basal serum thyroglobulin levels in tumor progression during active surveillance (35). In our cohort, 23% of the patients decided to undergo surgery despite no increase in tumor size, mostly due to anxiety stemming from the follow-up. All of them were classified as low risk of recurrence with an initial excellent response to treatment and no evidence of disease after 4.6 years of follow-up.

In conclusion, this is the first study reported in Latin America related to active surveillance in appropriately selected patients with PTC. Only a quarter of patients who were offered to undergo an active surveillance of the PTC accepted this procedure. Additionally, around 10% of patients decided to abandon active surveillance due to anxiety. Although surgical treatment continues to be the standard procedure in most patients with thyroid carcinoma, this new approach would be safe, effective, and easily applicable in centers with extensive experience in the management of patients with thyroid cancer.

Acknowledgments

we would like to thank the current team of the Thyroid Section at the Hospital de Clínicas from the University of Buenos Aires: Mónica Sala, Erika Abelleira, Fernanda Bueno, Fernando Jerkovich, David Marin Ossa, Gabriela García Falcone, and Mirna Peñaloza.

REFERENCES

1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(1):7-30. [ Links ]

2. Noone AM, Howlader N, Krapcho M, Miller D, Brest A, Yu M, et al. Cronin KA (eds). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2015, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD. Avaiable from: https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2015/, based on November 2017 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April 2018. [ Links ]

3. Vaccarella S, Franceschi S, Bray F, Wild CP, Plummer M, Dal MasoL. Worldwide thyroid-cancer epidemic? The increasing impact of overdiagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(7):614-7. [ Links ]

4. Brito JP, Al Nofal A, Montori VM, Hay ID, Morris JC. The impact of subclinical disease and mechanism of detection on the rise in thyroid cancer incidence: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota during 1935 through 2012. Thyroid. 2015;25(9):999-1007. [ Links ]

5. Leboulleux S, Tuttle MR, Pacini F, Schlumberger M. Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: time to shift from surgery to active surveillance? Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4(11):933-42. [ Links ]

6. Grodski S, Brown T, Sidhu S, Gill A, Robinson B, Learoyd D, et al. Increasing incidence of thyroid cancer is due to increased pathologic detection. Surgery. 2008;144(6):1038-43. [ Links ]

7. Kovacs G, Gonga G, Vadasz G, Ludmány E, Uhrin K, Görömbey Z, et al. Epidemiology of thyroid microcarcinoma found in autopsy series conducted in areas of different iodine intake. Thyroid. 2005;15(2):152-7. [ Links ]

8. Ottino A, Pianzola, H, Castelletto R. Occult papillary thyroid carcinoma at autopsy in La Plata, Argentina. Cancer. 1989;64(2):547-51. [ Links ]

9. Harach HR, Franssila KO, Wasenius VM. Occult papillary carcinoma of the thyroid. A “normal” finding in Finland. A systematic autopsy study. Cancer. 1985;56(3):531-8. [ Links ]

10. Lubitz CC, Kong CY, McMahon PM, Daniels GH, Chen Y, Economopoulos KP, et al. Annual financial impact of well-differentiated thyroid cancer care in the United States. Cancer. 2016;120(9):1345-52. [ Links ]

11. Pitoia F, Cavallo A. Cáncer de tiroides. En busca del tratamiento personalizado. Medicina (Buenos Aires). 2012;72(6):503-13. [ Links ]

12. Ito Y, Uruno T, Nakano K, Takamura Y, Miya A, Kobayashi K, et al. An observation trial without surgical treatment in patients with papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid. Thyroid. 2003;13(4):381-7. [ Links ]

13. Ito Y, Miyauchi A. A therapeutic strategy for incidentally detected papillarymicrocarcinoma of the thyroid. Nat Clin Pract Endocrin Metab. 2007;3(3):240-8. [ Links ]

14. Tuttle RM, Fagin JA, Minkowitz G, Wong RJ, Roman B, Patel S, et al. Natural History and Tumor Volume Kinetics of Papillary Thyroid Cancers During Active Surveillance. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;143(10):1015-20. [ Links ]

15. Ito Y, Miyauchi A, Inoue H, Fukushima M, Kihara M, Higashiyama T, et al. An observational trial for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma in Japanese patients. World J Surg. 2010;34(1):28-35. [ Links ]

16. Sugitani I, Toda K, Yamada K, Yamamoto N, Ikenaga M, Fujimoto Y. Three distinctly different kinds of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma should be recognized: our treatment strategies and outcomes. World J Surg. 2010;34(6):1222-31. [ Links ]

17. Ito Y, Miyauchi A, Kihara M, Higashiyama T, Kobayashi K, Miya A. Patient age is significantly related to the progression of papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid under observation. Thyroid. 2014;24(1):27-34. [ Links ]

18. Miyauchi A. Clinical trials of active surveillance of papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid. World J Surg. 2016;40(3):516-22. [ Links ]

19. Miyauchi A, Ito Y, Oda H. Insights into the management of papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid. Thyroid. 2018;28(1):23-31. [ Links ]

20. Miyauchi A, Kudo T, Ito Y, Oda H, Yamamoto M, Sasai H, et al. Natural history of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: Kinetic analyses on tumor volume during active surveillance and before presentation. Surgery. 2018;165(1):25-30. [ Links ]

21. Kwon H, Oh HS, Kim M, Park S, Jeon MJ, Kim WG, et al. Active surveillance for patients with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a single center’s experience. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102(6):1917-25. [ Links ]

22. Cibas ES, Ali SZ, NCI Thyroid FNA State of the Science Conference. The Bethesda System for reporting thyroid cytopathology. Am J Clin Pathol. 2009;132(5):658-65. [ Links ]

23. Haugen BR, Sawka AM, Alexander EK, Doherty GM, Mandel SJ, Nikiforov YE, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid. 2016;26(1):1-133. [ Links ]

24. Amin MB, Edge S, Greene F, Byrd DR, Brookland RK, Washington MK, et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th ed. New York: Springer; 2017. [ Links ]

25. Momesso DP, Vaisman F, Yang SP, Bulzico DA, Corbo R, Vaisman M, et al. Dynamic risk stratification in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer treated without radioactive iodine. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101(7):2692-700. [ Links ]

26. Mitsuzu K, Koga H, Sugimoto M, Arai Y, Ohyama C, Kakehi Y, et al. Current use of active surveillance for localized prostate cancer: A nationwide survey in Japan. Int J Urol. 2015;22(8):754-9. [ Links ]

27. Ito Y, Miyauchi A, Oda H, Low-risk papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid: A review of active surveillance trials. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44(3):307-15. [ Links ]

28. Pitoia F, Miyauchi A. 2015 American Thyroid Association Guidelines for Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer and their implementation in various care settings. Thyroid. 2016;26(2):319-21. [ Links ]

29. Brito JP, Moon JH, Zeuren R, Kong SH, Kim YG, Iñiguez-Ariza NM, et al. Thyroid Cancer Treatment Choice: A pilot study of a tool to facilitate conversations with patients with papillary microcarcinomas considering treatment options. Thyroid. 2018;28(10):1325-31. [ Links ]

30. Lee SE, Hwang TS, Choi YL, Han HS, Kim WS, Jang MH, et al. Prognostic significance of TERT promoter mutations in papillary thyroid carcinomas in a BRAF(V600E) mutation-prevalent population. Thyroid. 2016;26(7):901-10. [ Links ]

31. Oda H, Miyauchi A, Ito Y, Yoshioka K, Nakayama A, Sasai H, et al. Incidences of unfavorable events in the management of low-risk papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid by active surveillance versus immediate surgery. Thyroid. 2016,26(1):150-5. [ Links ]

32. Rosato L, Avenia N, Bernante P, De Palma M, Gulino G, Nasi PG, et al. Complications of thyroid surgery: analysis of a multicentric study on 14,934 patients operated on in Italy over 5 years. World J Surg. 2004;28(3):271-6. [ Links ]

33. Brito J, Ito Y, Miyauchi A, Tuttle RM. A clinical framework to facilitate risk stratification when considering an active surveillance alternative to immediate biopsy and surgery in papillary microcarcinoma. Thyroid. 2016;26(1):144-9. [ Links ]

34. Kim HI, Jang HW, Ahn HS, Ahn S, Park SY, Oh YL, et al. High serum TSH level is associated with progression of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma during active surveillance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;103(2):446-51. [ Links ]

35. Trimboli P, Treglia G, Giovanella L. Preoperative measurement of serum thyroglobulin to predict malignancy in thyroid nodules: A systematic review. Horm Metab Res. 2015;47(4):247-52. [ Links ]

Partial data from this study was presented in the Argentinian congress of Endocrinology in November 2017, and was awarded with the young investigator prize in the 17th International Congress of the Hospital de Clínicas

Received: January 22, 2019; Accepted: June 19, 2019

Correspondence to: Fabián Pitoia. Córdoba 2351, 5th floor fpitoia@intramed.net

Disclosure: no potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Creative Commons License  This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.