Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Varying Patterns of water circulation in Canal de Cotegipe, Baía de Todos os Santos

Abstracts

The Canal de Cotegipe is a 30 m deep, 4 km long tidal channel in northeastern Brazil connecting the small Baía de Aratu (24.5 km²) to the much larger Baía de Todos os Santos (1223 km²). Several industrial and port facilities surround the channel and Baía de Aratu, and polluted riverine discharge as well as a direct release of toxic residuals by harbor operations makes the area one of the four polluted hot-spots within Baía de Todos os Santos. An analysis of current measurements, tidal elevation records and water quality monitoring has allowed for a preliminary understanding of the driving forces that affect the channel. Tidal flows are modulated by the extent of intertidal inundation in the channel and the bay, with stronger ebb-dominant flow conditions associated with neap tides at the seaward end of the channel and with spring tides at the landward end of the channel. Subtidal flows are mainly driven by density gradients normally oriented towards Baía de Todos os Santos, leading to a vertically stratified, estuarine like flow. This structure is strengthen in the wet season and weakened in the dry season when unstratified or evenand inverse estuarine stratification may develop as a result of higher evaporation rates.

Baía de Todos os Santos; estuary; subtidal circulation; Baía de Aratu


O Canal de Cotegipe com 30 m de profundidade e 4 km de extensão estabelece a conexão entre a Baía de Aratu (24,5 km²) e a Baía de Todos os Santos (1223 km²). Ao redor da Baía de Aratu e ao longo do Canal de Cotegipe existe uma expressiva concentração industrial e portuária, acarretando em descargas tóxicas que transformam a região em um dos quatro importantes focos de poluição dentro da Baía de Todos os Santos. Análises de dados correntométricos, maregráficos e de qualidade de água permitiram uma avaliação inicial dos mecanismos de circulação ao longo do canal. Os dados indicam que os fluxos de maré são modulados pela extensão de inundação da região intermarés. Uma amplificação do domínio do fluxo de vazante ocorre nas marés de quadratura junto à saída do canal, e em sizígia na sua extremidade interna. Fluxos com freqüência submareal estabelecem-se principalmente devido ao gradiente de densidade normalmente orientado em direção à Baía de Todos os Santos, acarretando em uma estratificação vertical de característica estuarina. Esta estrutura de fluxo é reforçada no inverno e atenuada no verão, quando a redução do gradiente de densidade permite o estabelecimento de fluxos não estratificados ou até mesmo com estratificação estuarina inversa ocasionada pelo aumento das taxas de evaporação.

Baía de Todos os Santos; estuário; circulação subtidal; Baía de Aratu


Varying Patterns of water circulation in Canal de Cotegipe, Baía de Todos os Santos

Marcelo Augusto Greve PereiraI; Guilherme Camargo LessaII

ICurso de Graduação em Oceanografia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Instituto de Geociências, 40170-280 Salvador, BA, Brazil. Present address: Petrobras, E&P-Serv-US-Sub, Rodovia Amaral Peixoto, 27925-290 Macaé, RJ, Brazil. Phone: +55(22) 2761-5431 - E-mail: marcelooceano@gmail.com

IIInstituto de Geociências, Universidade Federal da Bahia, 40170-280 Salvador, BA, Brazil. Correspondence address: 1040 Jackson St. Bld118 #404 Albany CA 94706 EUA - E-mail: gclessa@gmail.com

ABSTRACT

The Canal de Cotegipe is a 30 m deep, 4 km long tidal channel in northeastern Brazil connecting the small Baía de Aratu (24.5 km2) to the much larger Baía de Todos os Santos (1223 km2). Several industrial and port facilities surround the channel and Baía de Aratu, and polluted riverine discharge as well as a direct release of toxic residuals by harbor operations makes the area one of the four polluted hot-spots within Baía de Todos os Santos. An analysis of current measurements, tidal elevation records and water quality monitoring has allowed for a preliminary understanding of the driving forces that affect the channel. Tidal flows are modulated by the extent of intertidal inundation in the channel and the bay, with stronger ebb-dominant flow conditions associated with neap tides at the seaward end of the channel and with spring tides at the landward end of the channel. Subtidal flows are mainly driven by density gradients normally oriented towards Baía de Todos os Santos, leading to a vertically stratified, estuarine like flow. This structure is strengthen in the wet season and weakened in the dry season when unstratified or evenand inverse estuarine stratification may develop as a result of higher evaporation rates.

Keywords: Baía de Todos os Santos, estuary, subtidal circulation, Baía de Aratu.

RESUMO

O Canal de Cotegipe com 30 m de profundidade e 4 km de extensão estabelece a conexão entre a Baía de Aratu (24,5 km2) e a Baía de Todos os Santos (1223 km2). Ao redor da Baía de Aratu e ao longo do Canal de Cotegipe existe uma expressiva concentração industrial e portuária, acarretando em descargas tóxicas que transformam a região em um dos quatro importantes focos de poluição dentro da Baía de Todos os Santos. Análises de dados correntométricos, maregráficos e de qualidade de água permitiram uma avaliação inicial dos mecanismos de circulação ao longo do canal. Os dados indicam que os fluxos de maré são modulados pela extensão de inundação da região intermarés. Uma amplificação do domínio do fluxo de vazante ocorre nas marés de quadratura junto à saída do canal, e em sizígia na sua extremidade interna. Fluxos com freqüência submareal estabelecem-se principalmente devido ao gradiente de densidade normalmente orientado em direção à Baía de Todos os Santos, acarretando em uma estratificação vertical de característica estuarina. Esta estrutura de fluxo é reforçada no inverno e atenuada no verão, quando a redução do gradiente de densidade permite o estabelecimento de fluxos não estratificados ou até mesmo com estratificação estuarina inversa ocasionada pelo aumento das taxas de evaporação.

Palavras-chave: Baía de Todos os Santos, estuário, circulação subtidal, Baía de Aratu.

INTRODUCTION

Exchange flows in estuarine zones are driven by two main process called tidal pumping/trapping and steady baroclinic flows (Martin et al., 2007). The former acts at tidal frequencies and is associated with the spatial characteristics of the flow (jet or radial flow) and with differences in phase of the cross-section averaged tidal velocity and scalar concentrations. The latter acts at subtidal frequencies and are associated with density gradients that induce stratified flows. Flow stratification coupled with vertical gradients of a scalar in the water column will lead to exchanges between different sectors of the estuary or between the estuary and the ocean.

Because estuarine flows are influenced by freshwater runoff, atmospheric water balance, winds and tidal and subtidal sea-level oscillations the circulation driving mechanisms for bothtidal and subtidal frequencies may change seasonally. Therefore, retention or importation of suspended matter and solutes may alternate with periods of exportation at given times of the year or at some tidal conditions (Stacey et al., 2001).

The Canal de Cotegipe is a 30 m deep, 4 km long tidal channel in northeastern Brazil connecting small Baía de Aratu (24.5 km2) to the much larger Baía de Todos os Santos (BTS) (1223 km2) (Fig. 1). One hundred and seventy different industries including textiles, mechanics, agricultural, siderurgical and petro- and chemical unities have been installed at the vicinities of Baía de Aratuin the last 60 years (CRA, 2004). Also, a large State-owned commodity port (Aratu) and three private ports (Navy, Ford and Moinho Dias Branco) are located along Canal de Cotegipe. This intense industrial occupation gives rise to polluted riverine discharge as well as a direct release of toxic residuals due to harbor operations making the area one of the four polluted hot-spots within the BTS. The clayey sediment size inside the bay have favored the retention of pollutants such as lead, copper and zinc, adhered both to suspended and bottom sediments (Freire Filho, 1979; Alves, 2002; CRA, 2004).


This paper analyses existing sets of hydrodynamic and water quality data collected along Canal de Cotegipe in different years covering the annual seasonality of the area. The study aims to contribute with the understanding of the flow structure in the channel and the potential for scalars' exchange between the Baía de Aratu and BTS.

STUDY SITE

Baía de Aratu is a small system that includes the bay itself and a 4 km long channel (Canal de Cotegipe) that connects the central part of the bay to the BTS. Baía de Aratu is centered at 12º47.1' S and 38º28.2' W, with a maximum width and length of 214 m and 4.1 km, respectively. The bay is shallow (Fig. 1), with an area weighted depth of 1.8 m and intertidal depths that account for 24% (5.7 km2) of the whole bay area. Eighty five percent the bay is shallower than 5 m, and areas deeper than 10 m are basically restricted to Canal de Cotegipe, where a maximum of40 m is recorded.

The climate in the region is tropical humid, with an annual mean temperature, precipitation and evaporation of 25.3ºC, 2086 mm and 1002 mm, respectively (Salvador Meteorological Station - INMET, 1992). Two well defined, wet and dry seasons exist. The wet season spans from March to July (Fig. 2), when it rains 60% of the total annual precipitation. The maximum monthly average (1930-1990) precipitation is 322 mm in May, whereas the minimum is 90 mm in January. The dry season spans from August to February, with a period of slightly higher precipitation in November. Mean annual evaporation amounts to 96 mm, with monthly rates varying between 80 mm (May) and 110 mm (January). The fluvial discharge from a small catchment area reaches the bay via two perennial rivers, Santa Maria and Cotegipe Rivers, which together have an estimated average annual discharge of 1.65 m2 s-1 (CRA, 2000).


Precipitation and evaporation rates are similar during the dry season. The atmospheric water balance, which is net positive annually, can be negative during the dry season as it is shown in the climatology for the years 1931-1960 (Fig. 2b). Monthly mean temperature variation throughout the year is approximately 3ºC (INMET, 1992), with maximum mean values between January and March (26,7ºC) and minimum between July and August (24ºC).

The tides in the BTS are characteristically semi-diurnal, and ranges increase up bay by a factor of 1.5 (Cirano & Lessa, 2007). M amplitude grows from 0.67 m in the ocean to 0.89 m in the center of the bay and 1.06 m in the westernmost bay reach. A tide gauge deployed for 39 days in 1988 at the entrance of Canal de Cotegipe indicates an average spring tide range of 2.31 m (Lessa et al., 2001). Assuming that these ranges are reproduced throughout the bay (with an area of 24.5 km2), the tidal prism is about 5.3 × 106m3. Given the annual mean fresh water discharge of 1.65 m3 s-1 (CRA, 2000), hence the freshwater inflow during a full tidal cycle corresponds to less than 1% of the spring tidal prism.

The wind field shows strong seasonality, blowing from E and SE in the dry season and from S and SW in the wet season. Average and maximum wind magnitude at Ilha dos Frades (Fig. 1), in the center of the BTS, is about 5 m s-1 and 12 m s-1 respectively, (Pereira, 2008). Despite the large bay area, the wind does not exert significant influence on its circulation, as indicated by Cirano & Lessa (2007).

DATA SET

Tides

The tide was monitored between April 2006 and January 2007 with a digital pressure sensor Global Logger installed at the Aratu Navy Base (Fig. 1). The pressure sensor was fixed inside a PVC tube and the logger was configured to get a single reading every 3 minutes. Although the data was downloaded regularly (about every two weeks), battery failure and instrument malfunction caused several data losses.

Harmonic analysis of the longest data set (112 continuous days between July and November 2006), was performed according to Franco (1988) with the aid of the software PacMare. This same data set was used to determine the tidal ranges and tidal asymmetry, as well as the power spectral density with the Fast Fourier Transform. A Fourier low-pass filter, with a cut off period of 73 hours (equivalent to a Doodson filter), was used to separate low frequency fluctuations from the tidal oscillations throughout the time series.

Tidal distortion or asymmetry was calculated by the ratio of rising over falling tide time (). The natural logarithm of this ratio instead of the ratio itself was used in order to provide an equal distribution of both positive and negative asymmetries in relation to a symmetrical tidal form ( = 1). Negative (positive) ratios indicate that the falling (rising) tide lasts longer than the rising (falling) tide.

Currents

Long-term records of the current speed and direction were obtained by means of moored ADCP's and Aanderaa's RCM-7 current meters. Moored ADCP data was provided by the National Oceanographic Data Bank (BNDO), whereas moored RCM-7 and S4 records were published by CRA (2000). The current vectors were decomposed in along-channel and cross-channel components, with positive values associated with the westward (ebb) flow in the former and southward flow in the latter. Negative along-channel velocities were flood directed.

Fourier low and high pass filters were used to separate supratidal and low frequency current fluctuations in all time series. Respective cut off periods were 53 hours (corresponding to the inertial period at this latitude) and 12.4 hours (tidal frequency).In order to investigate tidal current asymmetry, maximum ebband maximum flood current speeds for each tidal cycle were extracted from the supratidal time series. Again, the natural logarithm of the ratio between maximum flood and maximum ebbcurrent speed were calculated. Astronomical tidal constituents were calculated according to Franco (1988) with the aid of the software PacMare.

Moored ADCP's

Two RDI ADCP Sentinel 300 kHz were moored (stations #101 and #201 in Fig. 1) at the bottom of Canal de Cotegipe from November 12 to December 14 2002 (dry season) and from June 14 to July 16 2003 (wet season) at water depths of about 25 m. Equipment malfunction stopped data acquisition after 3 weeks after being deployed in the dry season. Velocity data was obtained every 1 m starting at 3 m above the bottom up to the surface. Measurements close to the surface were affected by reflection, and the identification of biased measurement depths was performed by comparing the standard deviation of the current magnitudes. In both stations valid data extended up to 2 m below the lowest low tide during the campaign. Mean velocity magnitude and direction was calculated after a 1 minute burst (at 2 Hz) every 15 minutes. The water surface refers to the lowest low tide during the campaign.

Moored RCM-7 and S4

Two RCM-7 were moored at station #3 (Fig. 1) at depths of 8.7 m and 24.3 m. The instruments recorded synchronously every 0.25 hour for 15 days, between January 10 and January 25, 1999 (dry season) and between May 22 and June 6, 1999 (wet season).

Water properties

Time series of water temperature, conductivity and density were recorded with Seabird CTD's and published by CRA (2000) for two field campaigns coincident with the RCM-7 moorings. The measurements took place at stations #3 (Canal de Cotegipe) and #16 (BTS) (Fig. 1), both in the dry and wet seasons during a spring (January 18 and May 29, 1999) and neap (January 24 and June 06, 1999) tide.

RESULTS

Tides

Tides in Canal de Cotegipe are semi-diurnal, with form number K = (O1+ K1) / (M2+ S2) (Pond & Pickard, 1983) of 0.09 (Table 1). M2 amplitude and phase are 0.91 m and 114º respectively (Table 1), indicating an amplification of 0.11 m and a delay of about 12º in relation to the tide at the entrance of BTS (Cirano & Lessa, 2007). The mean tide range was 1.88 m, whereas the maximum reached 3.33 m close to the equinox in September (Fig. 3). This range is 0.5 m larger than the maximum previously recorded in the same location by the Brazilian Hydrographic Authority (Lessa et al., 2001).


Variance analysis of the reconstituted and measured tides shows that the astronomical signal is responsible for 98% of the observed changes in the sea surface elevation. Subtidal oscillations varied in height between 0.10 m and 0.17 m (Fig. 3), with periods ranging from 9 to 13 days in accordance with the spectral signature of the time series (Fig. 4). The energy concentration at 27 days is ascribed to differences between consecutive spring tides in the analyzed record, which included a lunarperigee/apogee cycle.


Overall, tidal distortion in Canal de Cotegipe causes a shorter falling tide. The average and maximum duration of the rising tide in the whole data set is 6.4 hours and 7.5 hours, respectively. Figure 5 shows the plot of the natural logarithm of the ratio between the duration of the rising and falling tide for each tidal cycle against its respective high tide level. The data distribution shows that the large majority of the ratios are positive (shorter falling tides), with larger ratios, or more distorted tides, occurring during neap tides. The fewer negative ratios become less numerous at larger tide ranges, where the tides tend to a symmetrical form.


ADCP current measurements

The mean vertical current velocity magnitude in Canal de Cotegipe was around 0.17 m s-1, with maximum velocity magnitudes of 0.49 m s-1 in the landward end of the channel (stations #101 and #3 - Fig. 1) and 0,70 m s-1 at the seaward end (#201 - Fig. 1). The along channel current component was five to seventimes stronger than the cross channel component, especially at stations #101 and #3. The vertical variation of maximum velocity of the longitudinal component during spring and neap tides is shown in Figure 7 for the both dry season. It is observed that maximum current velocities were associated with the ebbing tide at both stations, reaching 0.54 m s-1 at station #101and 0.75 m s-1 at station #201. Maximum current velocities at neap tides were about half that during springs.


Peak ebb and flood tidal current velocities were regulated by the water surface elevation at high tide, although not consistently between stations #101 and #201 (Fig. 8). Although variations exist in the water column, its possible to identify that at station #101 ebb dominance occurred during spring tides and flood dominance during neap tides. At station #201, however, ebb (flood) dominance in the dry season occurred during neap (spring) tides. In the wet season the log ratios are rather scattered, and a clear trend is indiscernible.


Variance analysis of the reconstituted tidal current field after harmonic analysis shows that the astronomical tides explained between 91% (surface) and 98% (bottom) of the current variance at station #101, and between 75% (surface) and 93% (bottom) of the same variance at station #201. The most important tidal current components are M2, S2 and N2, which account for 37%, 16%, and 6% of the total tidal energy. Subtidal circulation, accountable for some of the remaining current variance, had frequencies of 8 to 11 days (Fig. 9) as suggested by the energy density distribution at station #101.


The magnitude of the low-pass filtered currents (Fig. 10) were about 10% of the tidal currents, with the exception of the ebb-oriented surface flow that attained up to 0.21 m s-1 at station #101 (dry season) and 0.13 m s-1 at station #201 (dry and wet seasons). It is observed that the current direction changes along the water column, ebbing at the surface and flooding at the bottom, as a classic gravitational estuarine circulation. In fact, the computed residual currents (Fig. 11) indicate the existence of a classical estuarine circulation at both stations either in the dry and in the wet seasons. Residual current magnitude varied between 0.02 m s-1 and 0.03 m s-1. A stronger gravitational circulation occurred in the wet season, when rainfall is higher.



Other modes of circulation are also indicated in Figure 10. It is noticed that there were occasions when unidirectional outgoing flows (station #201 in the dry season around days 8 and 20), unidirectional incoming flows (station #101 in the wet season around day 12) and even a short-lived inverse estuarine gravitational circulation (station #101 in the dry season around day 27) were established.

Anchored Aanderaas

Currents measured at station #3 in 1999 had similar magnitudes to those recorded in 2003 at the neighboring station #101. Figure 12 shows the variation of the longitudinal current component. Averaged and maximum magnitudes for the upper and lower instruments were approximately 0.17 m s-1 and 0.41 m s-1, respectively, and a little higher in the wet season, despite the fact that the tidal ranges in the dry season were slightly larger than in the wet season. Similarly to the ADCP velocity records, maximum flood and ebb velocities were regulated by the extent of intertidal inundation. Relatively stronger ebb velocities were observed at large spring tides whereas relatively stronger flood velocities occurred at smaller neap tides (Fig. 13), similarly to what was observed at station #101 in the dry season (Fig. 8).



The maximum subinertial current magnitude was recorded in the wet season, equaling 0.08 m s-1 at the bottom (Fig. 12). Landward-directed flow prevailed in the two stations both in both dry and wet seasons. A worth noting exception occurred in the beginning of the dry season record when an inverse estuarine circulation was shortly established. The residual currents had an average value of -0.02 m s-1 at all stations.

Low frequency oscillations with periods of 2-3 days were recorded in the wet season in both (surface and bottom) current meters, being partially in phase. The correlation between the surface and bottom filtered time series was high in the dry season (R2 = 0.81), but non-existent in the wet season (R2 = 0.09).

Water Properties

Figure 14 shows the spread of TS values for stations #3 and#16. The data refers to neap and spring cycles both in the dry and wet seasons. Dry season records cluster in the upper right corner of the graph, with salinities higher than 36 and temperatures above 28ºC. This thermohaline characteristics indicates that the tropical water (TW) mass is advected into Baía de Todos os Santos in the dry season, as reported by Cirano & Lessa (2007). Maximum values of temperature and salinity were recorded on February 2006, reaching 30.5ºC and 37.7, respectively. In the wet season a coastal water mass (CW) was formed, with salinities smaller than 35 and temperatures below 28ºC. Larger temperature variations occurred in the dry season (1.5ºC and 1.3ºC for stations #3 and #16, respectively), whereas salinity differences became more pronounced in the wet season (2.5 and 1.5 for stations #3 and #16, respectively - Fig. 14).


Water temperature was slightly higher inside Baía de Aratu, where a maximum of 30.5ºC was recorded. Dry and wet seasons mean values at station #3 (29.4ºC and 26.9ºC) were about 0.5ºC higher than the respective ones at station #16 (28.7ºC and 26.6ºC). Negligible differences were observed between spring and neap tides (Figs. 15 and 16), and stronger vertical gradients(maximum difference of 0.5ºC between surface and bottom) occurred during the dry season.



Opposite to temperature, the salinity gradient inverted from dry to wet season. Salinity values in the dry season were higher at station #3 than at station #16. Mean values at those stations were 37.1 and 36.8, respectively. Salinity at the bottom of station #16 showed consistent lower values, both in the dry and in the wet seasons regardless of the tidal cycle. This phenomenon may be ascribed to local discharge of an aquifer, possibly alonga fault line.

In the wet season, salinity decreased at station #3 in respect to that at station #16 with mean values of 33.8 and 34.5 for those respective stations (Figs. 15 and 16). If the deepest records at station #16 are not taken into account, the vertical salinity gradient was small at all monitoring campaigns, but smaller during the wet season. Highest vertical gradients were observed in the wet season, with a maximum of 1.3 at station #3.

The density distribution in Figures 15 and 16 shows that the mean density at station #16 was always larger than at station #3, although rather less significant in the dry season. Mean density values at these respective stations were 1023.57 kg/m3 and 1023,53 kg/m3 in the dry, and 1022.51 kg/m3 and 1021.90 kg/m3 in the wet season. The horizontal density gradients were small and with negligible differences between spring and neap tides, but the wet season gradients were two times larger than during the dry season, with means of 0,6 × 10-5 kg.m-3.m-1 and 1.5 × 10-5 kg.m-3.m-1, respectively. Mean density differences between the two stations in the dry season were smaller than the standard deviations, suggesting that inversions in the direction of the density gradient may eventually take place.

DISCUSSION

Tidal distortion in Canal de Cotegipe (max Δtfloodtebb = 1.34) is larger than that verified outside in the center of the BTS (maxΔtfloodtebb = 1.03, Cirano & Lessa, 2007), which can be ascribed to a higher degree of friction imposed on thetidal wave inside the channel. The recorded rising to falling time ratios increased from spring to neap tides as a result of different rates of flooding and the depth distribution within the channel and bay intertidal area. Larger distortion during neap tides may be credited to a slow flooding rate of relative ample and low intertidal areas.

In micro and mesotidal settings this tidal distortion is normally conducive to ebb-dominant tidal currents (Dronkers, 1986; Aubrey & Friedrichs, 1988). Ebb-tidal current dominance, however, was not observed throughout the lunar cycle, and took place at contrasting tidal conditions at stations #101 and #201.In the former, closer to the bay, the flow was ebb dominated only during spring tides, whereas at station #201 ebb dominance was recorded at neap tides. Such contrast is likely due to the impact of the estuary hypsometry at the immediate vicinity to the station. Friedrichs & Aubrey (1988) and Lessa (2000) indicate that ebb dominance is proportional to the relative extent of the mangrove area, which in turn depends on the longitudinal position within the estuary. Therefore, the flow at station #101 is more affected by the hypsometry of Baía de Aratu than station #201, more influenced by changes in the surface area of Canal de Cotegipe during a tidal cycle. In fact, tidal current asymmetries at station #201 in the dry season reflected the asymmetry ratios of the tidal wave measured by the tide gauge, located a few hundred meters away (Fig. 1). More distorted neap tides caused the expected ebb dominance of the flow. The discrepancies of the tidal current asymmetry between both stations suggest that tidal wave distortion inside Baía de Aratu has a different cause from that at the entrance of Canal de Cotegipe, which may be due to a higher elevation of the intertidal areas.

The astronomical tide accounts for 98% of the water level variance, indicating that the subtidal oscillations play a small role in the tidal oscillations. Subtidal oscillations in Canal de Cotegipe were smaller than 0.17 m, in agreement with the 0.2 m maximum oscillations reported by Lessa et al. (2001) from a 1-year tidal record at Salvador Harbor. The energy distribution within subtidal frequencies shows a peak at 13 days, which is also concurrent to that observed in Salvador harbor (Lessa et al., 2001).

Similarly to water level, currents in Canal de Cotegipe were closely related to the astronomical tides. The correlation and variance explanation between observed and predicted tidal currents average 0.88 and 91%, respectively. Cirano & Lessa (2007) reported correlation values of 0.90 and variance explanation equal to 85% in the central part of the BTS and observe that wind driven circulation is only significant outside the bay. Therefore, subtidal circulation in the BTS, as well as in the Canal de Cotegipe, is most likely due to density gradients, low-frequency barotropic circulation and tidal pumping.

Although the water column is apparently well mixed throughout the year, spatial density differences are significant in driving subtidal flows that can exchange water, solids and solutes between Baía de Aratu and the BTS. The average density gradient between stations #16 (BTS) and #3 (Canal de Cotegipe) is directed towards the BTS, and increases from 0.6 × 10-5 kg m-4 in the dry season to 15 × 10-5 kg m-4 in the wet season. This gradient is almost twice as large as that verified by Cirano & Lessa (2007) (7.94 × 10-5 kg m-4) along the main axis of BTS for the same wet season.

The dry and wet season potential current established by the density gradient between Baía de Aratu and the BTS was calculated for neap and spring tides by applying the distribution of the time averaged density at equal non-dimensional intervals of the water column. According to Holloway et al. (1992), the magnitude of the density driven current U can be assessed by the equation

where Z = elevation (non-dimensional), H = total depth, ρo = mean density, Kz = vertical eddy viscosity assumed to be constant and a = (Kz/k H), where k is a linear bottom-friction coefficient given by . The vertical eddy viscosity is estimated by Kz = 0.06 u*H, whereas the friction velocity in the water is calculated by u* = (k u-H)0.5. The -H index refers to u at z = H. Typical values for H, u, u-H and Cd in the Canal de Cotegipe are 30 m-1, 0.18 m s-1, 0.1 m s-1 and 0.0025, respectively. The equation assumes a steady balance between the horizontal pressure gradient imposed by the density gradient and vertical friction, presuming that the path between both stations is a long narrow channel (Holloway et al., 1992). The vertical distribution for the calculated mean density currents are shown in Figure 17. Current magnitudes are similar to those observed in the wet season, achieving approximately 0.055 m s-1 at the corresponding elevation of the lower current meter. The calculated dry season velocities are however smaller than those observed, and suggest a strengthening of surface flows towards Baía de Aratu with no stratification. It is possible that other driving mechanism, such as lateral flow variability, was interfering with the low frequency current field at the monitoring site. It is worth noting that the zero-velocity contour occurs between the depths of 0.3 and 0.4, which is about or just above the relative elevation of the upper current meter. This helps to explain the predominance of landward-directed subtidal flows in both current time series.


Density gradient occasionally inverts in the dry season when salinity is increased due to more intense evaporation, overcoming the concurrent rise in the water temperature. Inverse estuarine circulation characterized by subtidal flows exiting Baía de Aratu through the bottom of Canal de Cotegipe was recorded in the dry season of 2002. Unfortunately, there were no concomitant measurements of water quality in- and outside Canal de Cotegipe to verify the density gradient. Moreover, a time series of precipitation and evaporation was not available to investigate the climatologic thresholds that triggered eventual inversions of the density gradient.

Stratified subtidal flow appears to be a rather frequent characteristic in the Canal de Cotegipe circulation. Unstratified subtidal flow as recorded at station #201 during spring tides in the dry season suggests that a spring-neap modulation can occur. Spring-neap modulations arise from the increasing of turbulent mixing at spring tides, resulting in thorough mixing of scalars along the water column. Similar process has been reported in both well-mixed (Genz, 2006) and partially stratified estuaries (Stacey et al., 2001; Ribeiro et al., 2004). Stacey et al. (2001) have also shown that pulses of residual-creating exchange flow could be created by barotropic forcing in a tidal cycle if stratification is asymmetric between flood and ebb tides.

Exchange of scalars between Baía de Aratu and BTS may occur both under unstratified and stratified subtidal flows. In the former, exchange can be driven by tidal trapping, where residual transport of any scalar is created by the difference in phase of the cross-section averaged tidal velocity and the scalar concentration. This is especially the case given that asymmetries do exist between ebb and flood currents, what would be expected to cause both exportation and importation of scalars. In the case of stratified subtidal flow, which apparently prevails in Canal de Cotegipe, net material transport will largely depend on the vertical distribution of its concentration. Assuming that scalar concentrations are homogeneous or even that a gradient exists towards the bottom, net-landward transport close to the bottom and net-seaward transport close to the surface would exist. In fact Poggio et al. (2005) calculated the suspended sediment transport at the thalweg in the mid-section of Canal de Cotegipe based on the vertical turbidity field obtained from ADCP observations. The results showed a net-sediment import in the lower 60% of the water column and net export in the upper 40%, with depth averaged net import of order of 10-4 kg s-1 m-1.

Besides the vertical variability of the subtidal circulation, lateral variability may also occur given the sinuosity of Canal de Cotegipe. Channel curvature affects the spatial distribution of ebbing and flooding tides across a channel cross-section resulting in residual-circulation gyres (Kjerfve et al., 1992). It is thus possible that small horizontal gyres exist away from the cross sections or may even be formed at other tidal conditions different from those monitored. For instance, station #201 indicates that in the dry season stratified and unstratified subtidal flows occur at neap and spring tides, respectively. Subtidal flows exiting the channel during spring tides could be counterbalanced by a landward-directed flow at a neighboring position in the cross section, since a seaward-directed flow was recorded at station #101 at those same days. A numerical simulation of the barotropic flow in Baía de Aratu and Canal de Cotegipe may be able to show whether or not lateral circulation is an important additional circulation mode.

CONCLUSION

Baía de Aratu is a well mixed system receiving a relatively small amount of freshwater that accounts for less than 1% of the spring tidal prism. Despite such small freshwater input the average density gradients between Baía de Aratu and BTS generate an estuarine type subtidal circulation along Canal de Cotegipe with landward-directed flows occurring in the lowest 60% of the water column. This subtidal circulation mode is strengthened in the wet season when the density gradient towards the BTS is increased. However, the estuarine vertical structure may change towards unidirectional outgoing or incoming flows when a combination of increasing turbulent mixing and weaker density gradients homogenize the flow along the water column. An inverse estuarine flow structure may even occur when the direction of the density gradient is inverted in the dry season or during long dry periods.

The tidal currents appear to be a co-player in the process of exchanging water and scalars between Baía de Aratu and BTS. Ebb and flood dominant cycles alternate between neap and springtides especially in the dry season as a function of the extent of intertidal elevation. The tidal asymmetry at the mouth of Canal de Cotegipe induces ebb-dominant conditions in the current field during neap tides. Conversely, at the end of the channel ebb-dominant conditions occur at spring tides, suggesting the possibility that a different (possibly larger) tidal wave distortion occurs inside Baía de Aratu. Channel sinuosity is also likely to cause prevailing ebbing and flooding currents at opposite sides of a cross section during a tidal cycle, giving rise to horizontal eddies and residual-circulation gyres. The presence of such gyres would introduce lateral variability in the exchanging processes between the bays, what could explain some of the variability observed in the subtidal current field recorded with the moored instruments.

The results obtained so far indicate that non-conservative scalars in the lower half of the water column are likely to be transported into Baía de Aratu. This imply that noxious material that may eventually be set into suspension by harbor related activities just outside and along Canal de Cotegipe, may find the bay as a final repository. Similarly, toxic substances coming into the bay via the rivers may likely remain inside the bay if settling takes them deeper in the water column.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We want to thank the National Oceanographic Data Bank (BNDO), kept by the Brazilian Navy, for providing a copy of the moored ADCP current measurements. The Aratu Naval Base kindly allowed us to install the tide gauge at their premises. The Environmental Resource Center (CRA) from the State of Bahia provided a copy of water quality and hydrodynamic data of the moored Aanderaa current meters. We are also thankful to the two anonymous referees for their valuable suggestions. Both M. Pereira (PIBIC scholarship) and G. Lessa (research fellowship) are sponsored by CNPq.

Recebido em 15 fevereiro, 2008 / Aceito em 8 janeiro, 2009

Received on February 15, 2008 / Accepted on January 8, 2009

NOTES ABOUT THE AUTHORS

Marcelo Augusto Greve Pereira is a graduated in Oceanography (2008) at Universidade Federal da Bahia. He currently works at Petrobras (Exploration andProduction Sector, Submarine Services Unit), being responsible for ocean monitoring/instrumentation and management of oceanographic data. His research interest is coastal and shelf oceanography.

Guilherme Camargo Lessa has a Geography degree from the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (1985) and a MSc in Geography from the UniversidadeFederal do Rio de Janeiro (1990). He obtained his PhD in Marine Sciences at the University of Sydney (Australia) in 1994. He has worked as a Post-Doc at the Universidade Federal do Paraná, Universidade Federal da Bahia and University of California - Berkeley. He joined the Universidade Federal da Bahia as an Associate Professor in 1997. His research interests cover marine sedimentology, coastal and estuarine circulation and coastal (barrier-estuarine) geological evolution.

  • ALVES T. 2002. Caracterizaçăo Geoquímica do Substrato Lamoso de Zonas de Manguezal da Baía de Aratu - Bahia. MSc Dissertation, Programa em Geoquímica e Meio Ambiente, Universidade Federal da Bahia,120 pp.
  • AUBREY DG & FRIEDRICHS CT. 1988. Seasonal climatology of tidalnon-linearities in a shallow estuary. In: AUBREY DG & WEISHAR L. (Eds.). Hydrodynamics and sediment dynamics of tidal inlets. Lecture Notes on Coast. Est. Studies, 29: 103-124.
  • CIRANO M & LESSA GC. 2007. Oceanographic characteristics of Baía de Todos os Santos, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Geophysics, 25(4): 363-387.
  • CRA - Centro de Recursos Ambientais. 2000. Saneamento ambiental da Baía de Todos os Santos. Technical Report RT-257-03-GR-002-RF, 248 pp.
  • CRA - Centro de Recursos Ambientais. 2004. Diagnóstico da concentração de metais pesados e hidrocarbonetos de petróleo nos sedimentos e biota da Baía de Todos os Santos. Technical 0293-RT-00-MA-008 R-02, Vol. II. 394 pp.
  • DRONKERS J. 1986. Tidal asymmetry and estuarine morphology. Netherlands J. Sea Res., 20(2/3): 117-131.
  • FRANCO AS. 1988. Tides, fundamentals, analysis and prediction - Fundaçăo Centro Tecnológico de hidráulica. Săo Paulo, 249 pp.
  • FREIRE FILHO R. 1979. Um estudo sobre os metais pesados nos sedimentos recentes da Baía de Aratu (BA). MSc Dissertation, Programa de Pós-graduaçăo em Geologia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, 98 p.
  • FRIEDRICHS CT & AUBREY DG. 1988. Non-linear tidal distortions in shallow well-mixed estuaries: a synthesis. Est. Coast. Shelf Sci., 27: 521-545.
  • GENZ F. 2006. Avaliaçăo dos efeitos da Barragem Pedra do Cavalosobre a circulaçăo estuarina do Rio Paraguaçu e Baía de Iguape. PhD Dissertation, Programa de Pós-graduaçăo em Geologia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, 250 pp.
  • HOLLOWAY PE, SYMONDS G & NUNES VAZ R. 1992. Observations of Circulation and Exchange Processes in Jervis Bay, New South Wales. Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res., 43: 1487-1515.
  • INMET - Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia. 1992. Normais Climatológicas - 1961 a 1990. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Disponível em: < http://www.inmet.gov.br/html/clima/graficos/index4.html > . Acesso em: 9 jan. 2008.
  • KJERFVE B, SEIM HE, BLUMBERG AF & WRIGHT LD. 1992. Modelling of the Residual Circulation in Broken Bay and the Lower Hawkesbury River, NSW. Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res., 43: 1339-1357.
  • LESSA GC. 2000. Morphodynamic controls on vertical and horizontal tides - field results from two macrotidal shallow estuaries: central Queensland, Australia. J. Coast. Res., 16(4): 976-989.
  • LESSA GC, DOMINGUEZ JML, BITTENCOURT ACSP & BRICHTA A. 2001. The Tides and Tidal Circulation of Todos os Santos Bay, Northeast Brazil: a general characterization. An. Acad. Bras. Cienc., 73(2): 245-261.
  • MARTIN MA, FRAM JP & STACEY MT. 2007. Seasonal chlorophyll a fluxes between the coastal Pacific Ocean and San Francisco Bay. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 337: 51-61.
  • PEREIRA MG. 2008. Caracterizaçăo da hidrodinâmica do Canal de Cotegipe e Baía de Aratu. Trabalho Final de Graduaçăo, Curso de Graduaçăo em Oceanografia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, 51 pp.
  • POGGIO CA, CARDIA RR & LESSA GC. 2005. Caracterizaçăo da circulaçăo estuarina durante um ciclo de maré em uma seçăo da Baía de Aratu (Bahia). In: Congresso Brasileiro de Oceanografia, 2005, Vitória. Anais. Vitória: CBO, 3 pp. CD-ROM.
  • POND S & PICKARD GL. 1983. Introductory Dynamical Oceanography. Oxford. Pergamon Press. 329 p.
  • RIBEIRO CHA, WANIEK JJ & SHARPLES J. 2004. Observations of the spring-neap modulation of the gravitational circulation in a partiallymixed estuary. Ocean Dynamics, 54: 299-306.
  • STACEY MT, BURAU JR & MONISMITH SG. 2001. Creation of residual flows in a partially stratified estuary. J. Geoph. Res., 106(C8): 17,013-17,037.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    14 Aug 2009
  • Date of issue
    Mar 2009

History

  • Accepted
    08 Jan 2009
  • Received
    15 Feb 2008
Sociedade Brasileira de Geofísica Av. Rio Branco, 156, sala 2510, 20043-900 Rio de Janeiro RJ - Brazil, Tel. / Fax: (55 21) 2533-0064 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: sbgf@sbgf.org.br