Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Proposal for management of absenteeism among hospital nurses: a systematic review

Abstract

Objective:

To search the literature for information on interdependent factors influencing absenteeism of hospital nurses using a multicausal perspective analysis and to identify possible management and control actions.

Methods:

This systematic review included publications from 2013 to 2017. We used keywords from databases available at the portal of Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES). EndNote® software was used to manage data, and we followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items For Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method.

Results:

A total of 269 articles were retrieved, and 39 of them met our inclusion criteria. Studies that attributed absenteeism to a number of non-specific reasons accounted for 23.08% of the sample. The organization in work environment was defined as the reason in 20.51% of reports, musculoskeletal disease was the main reasons in 7.69%, and mental and behavioral disorders made up 10.26% of pointed causes. The Burnout syndrome was attributed as the reason for absenteeism in 7.69% of reports; satisfaction in work and psychological aspects accounted for 5.13% each in the studies, and relationship with other members of the nursing team, bullying and resilience, work environment, fatigue and conflicts with patients each were the reason in 2.56% of the studies analyzed in our systematic review.

Conclusion:

Absenteeism must be treated from a multiple, holistic, epidemiologic and prospective perspectives by adoption of organizational, physical and cognitive variables that are compatible with multicausal analyses.

Keywords
Health policy; Hospital; Management; Absenteeism

Resumo

Objetivo:

Investigar na literatura o conhecimento disponível sobre a interdependência dos agentes desencadeantes do absenteísmo da enfermagem hospitalar para inferir, a partir de uma perspectiva multicausal, possíveis ações de gestão e controle.

Métodos:

Revisão sistemática compreendendo o recorte temporal de 2013 à 2017, utilizando descritores operacionalizados em bases de dados indexadas do portal da Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES). A busca seguiu a metodologia Statement Preferred Reporting items For Systematic Reviews And Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) auxiliada pelo software EndNote®.

Resultados:

Finalizado o processo de depuração dos 269 artigos recuperados, 39 atenderam aos critérios de inclusão estabelecidos e, deles, 23,08% atribuiu a origem do absenteísmo a causas diversas não específicas. A organização do trabalho foi identificada como causa em 20,51% do material analisado, os adoecimentos musculoesqueléticos 15,38% e, os transtornos mentais e comportamentais totalizaram 10,26%. A síndrome de Burnout, 7,69% dos artigos, a satisfação no trabalho e os aspectos psicossociais 5,13% cada, relacionamento com demais membros das equipes, assédio e resiliência, ambiente laboral, fadiga e conflitos com o paciente, cada um, com 2,56% dos artigos analisados na revisão sistemática.

Conclusão:

Pelos resultados obtidos, concluiu-se que o absenteísmo deve ser tratado a partir de uma perspectiva múltipla, holística, epidemiológica e prospectiva através de variáveis organizacionais, físicas e cognitivas compatíveis com as análises multicausais.

Descritores
Política de saúde; Hospital; Gestão; Absenteísmo

Introduction

Sickness and disabling work accidents are complex phenomenon with multiple causes. Incapacity for work, one of the causes of absenteeism, is defined as the impossibility of developing function, activity or any task because of a disease or accident in the National Institute of Social Security's resolution DC/INSS no. 10 from December 12, 1999. In the health area, absenteeism is historically higher than in other areas, such as industry and manufacturing. Among hospital employees, nursing professionals are more exposed to risk of accidents and occupational diseases that lead to work leave, with a direct impact on patient care.(11. Damart S, Kletz F. When the management of nurse absenteeism becomes a cause of absenteeism: a study based on a comparison of two health care facilities. J Nurs Manag. 2016; 24(1):4-11.33. McGahan M, Kucharski G, Coyer F, Paper WA. Nurse staffing levels and the incidence of mortality and morbidity in the adult intensive care unit: a literature review. Aust Crit Care. 2012; 25(2):64-77.) Worldwide, scarcity and absenteeism of nursing professionals interfere in planning and dimensioning of working teams in hospitals.(22. O'brien-Pallas Li, Murphy GT, Shamian J, Li X, Hayes LJ. Impact and determinants of nurse turnover: a pan-Canadian study. J Nurs Manag. 2010; 18(8):1073-86.,33. McGahan M, Kucharski G, Coyer F, Paper WA. Nurse staffing levels and the incidence of mortality and morbidity in the adult intensive care unit: a literature review. Aust Crit Care. 2012; 25(2):64-77.) In this dynamic and unpredictable environment, which poses a risk of worsening pre-existing clinical status or of causing sickness and working accidents, participation of nurses is needed 24 hours a day.(44. Martins MM, Fernandes CS, Takase Gonçalves LH. [The family as the focus of nursing care in the hospital environment: an educational program]. Rev Bras Enferm. 2012; 65(4). Portuguese.) In addition, risk agents for the health of nursing professionals can be found in organizational, interpersonal or individual dimensions. Such agents can cause hypertension, diabetes, orthopedic and neurologic diseases, burnout syndrome, working stress, and job dis-satisfaction.(55. Daouk-Öyry L, Anouze AL, Otaki F, Dumit NY, Osman I. The JOINT model of nurse absenteeism and turnover: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014; 51(1):93-110.,66. Blanca-Gutiérrez JJ, del Carmen Jiménez-Díaz M, Escalera-Franco LF. [Effective interventions to reduce absenteeism among hospital nurses]. Gac Sanit. 2013; 27(6):545-51. Spanish.) The study “Absenteeism in the Industry” published in The Lancet on January 30, 1943, and Harrison and Martocchio's 1998 study investigated different dimensions and variables either individually or associated with possible reasons of absenteeism, but these studies did not reach any strong conclusions.

Because absenteeism originates in the institutional and work context, is due to psychological and physiological reactions, and also stems from individual and group suffering, our study sought to investigate reports in the literature about interdependency and its trigger agents to establish, using a multicausal perspective, possible interventions and control actions.(77. Ferreira RC, Griep RH, Fonseca MD, Rotenberg L. [A multifactorial approach to sickness absenteeism among nursing staff]. Rev Saude Publica. 2010; 46(2):259-68. Portuguese.)

Methods

The focused question for this systematic review was “What is origin of factors contributing to absenteeism, and how are they interrelated with management of absenteeism? This review, which was done in phases, included the establishment of a problem, data collection, assessment, analysis and interpretation, and presentation of results. This format allowed us to summarize the current knowledge about the specific topic by using set of documents that reported scientific evidence. (88. Mendes KD, Silveira RC, Galvão CM. [Integrative literature review: a research method to incorporate evidence in health care and nursing]. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2008; 17(4):758-64. Portuguese.1717. Omar K, Anuar MM, Salleh AM. Career plateauing: is it still a matter of concern? Medit J Soc Scienc. 2014; 5(7):224-30.) We used the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) method(1010. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg. 2010; 8(5):336-41.) (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Process of identification, analysis and selection of studies

The keywords were defined from the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL/EBSCO), Health Sciences Descriptors (DeCS/Bireme) and National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI/PubMed). Truncation symbols (*, $ or ?) or proximity and an ordering index (W/n, NEAR/n or [MeshTerm]) used with keywords allowed us to broad the search. Searching strategies applied were as follows:

  • (nurs* NEAR/2 absen*) OR (hospital nurs*NEAR/2 absen* causes);

  • (nurs* absent*) OR (hospital nurs* absent*);

  • (((((nurse[MeSH Terms]) AND absenteeism)) OR (((nurse[MeSH Terms]) AND absence)) AND (((hospital[MeSH Terms]) OR nurse)) AND absenteeism);

  • (nurs* W/2 absen*) OR (hospital nurs* W/2 absen* causes).

The review process included selection of databases, application of the limits available in each database, electronic searching of articles, exporting of data to EndNote®, pre-analysis of retrieved articles and selection of studies on the topic of this review.

Data were collected from Emerald, Engineering Village, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. First, aspects were related to broadening of content, ease of access, scientific output in engineering and health. A trial of EndNote software (version X7) was used to organize duplicity, access the title of the article, author names, title of the journal, keywords, digital object identifier (D.O.I.), and abstract.

In the search, priority was given to occurrences of terms in the title, summary, and keywords. If databases lacked these limits, we observed the occurrence of terms in the text of the publication.

During article selection, we evaluated the availability and free access to full-text articles published within the last five years: 2013 to 2017. We selected articles written in English, Portuguese and Spanish because the most recent reports on the topic were published in these languages. Types of publications excluded were letters, editorials, abstracts from proceedings, technical and scientific reports, and government publications.

Among the 269 studies retrieved, 62 duplicated have been removed, remaining 207. After exclusion, 110 studies found incomplete, presenting only the abstract had been excluded. The 97 full-text studies left had the title, the abstract, and the content analyzed by the authors independently. Any divergence has been outlined by the inclusion criteria: studies concerning specific causes of absenteeism among hospital nurses or nursing professionals from other health services, hospital or health service nursing professionals work absence and the work organization and environment contribution to nursing absenteeism. Then, 57 studies not matching the scope had been excluded remaining a set of 40 studies. Another 13 studies were suppressed for not meeting the inclusion criteria. The final sample consists of 27 studies.

The analysis of selected articles allowed us to identify theoretical concepts, methodologic approaches and conclusions about absenteeism (Chart 1).

Chart 1
Studies included in the systematic review

This study followed ethical aspects related to ideas, concepts, and definitions of studies included in this review. In adherence to publishing conventions, only significant studies were included.

Results

Most studies used a quantitative approach; 61.53% applied questionnaires, and 12.82% were reviews. Studies using a focus group, online questionnaires, and secondary data were 5.12% each. Other approaches, such as cost-benefit analysis, interviews, stochastic programing and cognitive mapping, each contributed 2.56% of the selected material.

Most of 26 journals were from the nursing area. We included 11 articles form the Journal of Nursing Management (28%), 3 articles from the International Journal of Nursing Studies (7.6%), 2 articles each from the Journal of Advanced Nursing and International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health (5.12%), and 1 article from the remaining journals (i.e., 2.5% of publications).

Studies with a statistical approach and data collection using questionnaires designed based on variables defined by authors and regression analysis made up 25.64% of studies, followed by those using Cronbach alpha coefficient in 23.08%, chi-squared test in 11.54% and Pearson's correlation in 7.69%. The multivariate analysis, cost-effectiveness relationship and chi-squared test along with regression analysis individually made up 3.85% of studies.

As contributing factor for absenteeism, 28.21% of studies identified organization of work as origin, 23.8% of studies did not report specific causes, 15.38% reported musculoskeletal disorders, and 10.26% reported mental and behavioral disorders.

Chart 1 shows studies that used a multicausal perspective, factors that, individually or in association, contributed to absenteeism among nursing professionals and contributed with new findings.

Burnout syndrome and job dissatisfaction were reported in 7.69% of articles; satisfaction in work and psychosocial aspects were pointed out in 5.13% each; and relationship with other team members, bullying and resilience, work environment, fatigue and conflicts with patient each were reported in 2.56% of the studies analyzed in our sample.

Discussion

A methodologic challenge in analyzing studies on absenteeism in nursing is interpretation of the data collected on work absenteeism. Comparison between studies that applied questionnaires and other similar approaches can cause distortions in results. Individual characteristics and management of organizational characteristics in health services, even from the same location, are disadvantaging factors and lead to failures and fragility of methods that not do allow extrapolation of findings.(1111. Adriaenssens J, De Gucht V, Maes S. Determinants and prevalence of burnout in emergency nurses: a systematic review of 25 years of research. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015; 52(2):649-61.)

Most studies used a quantitative approach and are limited in terms of their ability to statistically analyze the phenomena of absenteeism. Still, this aspect suggests the need for more innovative proposals using well-designed methods.

Of selected studies, 20.51% confirmed previous findings concluding that nursing organization of work is the reason for absences due to disease and the cause of absenteeism.(1212. Aiken LH, Cimiotti JP, Sloane DM, Smith HL, Flynn L, Neff DF. The effects of nurse staffing and nurse education on patient deaths in hospitals with different nurse work environments. Med care. 2011; 49(12):1047.,1313. Krane L, Larsen EL, Nielsen CV, Stapelfeldt CM, Johnsen R, Risør MB. Attitudes towards sickness absence and sickness presenteeism in health and care sectors in Norway and Denmark: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2014; 14(1):880.) We highlight that incorrect use of strategies to cushion effects of absenteeism might overload teams and increase the occurrence of absenteeism. A higher probability of absences was identified because of frequent structure changes compared with changes related to the patient care process. Studies that investigated aspects related to the nursing professional's age attributed the intention to abandon nursing to instability in work shifts.(1414. Bernstrøm VH, Kjekshus LE. Effect of organisational change type and frequency on long-term sickness absence in hospitals. J Nurs Manag. 2015; 23(6):813-22.,1515. Peters V, Engels JA, de Rijk AE, Nijhuis FJ. Sustainable employability in shiftwork: related to types of work schedule rather than age. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2015; 88(7):881-93.)

Work environment policy was associated with decline in satisfaction, commitment and performance in work as the reason for a high percentage of nurses intending to abandon the profession, showing negligent behavior and engaging in absenteeism.(1616. Atinga RA, Domfeh KA, Kayi E, Abuosi A, Dzansi G. Effects of perceived workplace politics in hospitals on nurses’ behavioural intentions in Ghana. J Nurs Manag. 2014; 22(2):159-69.) In addition, unlike previous studies, organizational empowering, resilient behavior of professionals, and professional plateauing were not identified as reasons for low scores on scales of work satisfaction, lack of professional commitment, high absenteeism and stress indexes, low motivation and high nurse turnover.(1717. Omar K, Anuar MM, Salleh AM. Career plateauing: is it still a matter of concern? Medit J Soc Scienc. 2014; 5(7):224-30.)

However, as multicausal etiologic phenomena in 23.8% of studies, absenteeism, an indicator of psychological and physical well-being, health at work and the necessity that nurses work in a health system are influenced by the physical environment of work, activities to be done, personnel, and organizational and cultural aspects. Inconsistent associations of these factors as the cause of absenteeism were due to contextual differences of studies.(1818. Belita A, Mbindyo P, English M. Absenteeism amongst health workers-developing a typology to support empiric work in low-income countries and characterizing reported associations. Hum Res Health. 2013; 11(1):34.)

In terms of sociodemographic, nursing professionals more affected by absenteeism are young professionals working in shifts, smokers, people with a history of mental disorders, those under treatment with psychotropic drugs, those who are sedentary, and alcohol users working in places with psychological support.(1919. Lamont S, Brunero S, Perry L, Duffield C, Sibbritt D, Gallagher R, Nicholls R. Mental health day'sickness absence amongst nurses and midwives: workplace, workforce, psychosocial and health characteristics. J Adv Nurs. 2017; 73(5):1172-81.) Absenteeism was also mentioned as a reason for professional favoritism, hostile work environment, longer work hours, overwork, unsatisfactory working conditions, lack of equipment and insufficient staff, lack of rewards system and incoherent decision. However, when absenteeism was motivated by health reasons, family-work interference, emotional symptoms (negatives) changes in work and salary, such reasons were identified as determining factors for self-perception of professional performance.(2020. Mudaly P, Nkosi ZZ. Factors influencing nurse absenteeism in a general hospital in Durban, South Africa. J Nurs Manag. 2015; 23(5):623-31. Portuguese.)

Common musculoskeletal disorders in nursing work were the objective of 15.38% of selected studies, the third most common reason. Compromise of the lumbar region was attributed to the activity of transferring patients between beds and stretchers and other care procedures, overload due to the lack of appropriate number of staff members, and conflicts among people on the same team, thereby causing feelings of isolation and organizational in-justice.(2121. Grataloup M, Massardier-Pilonchéry A, Bergeret A, Fassier JB. Job Restrictions for healthcare workers with musculoskeletal disorders: consequences from the superior's viewpoint. J Occup Rehabil. 2016; 26(3):245-52.) However, low back pain episodes as the reason for absence in work revealed incidence of 54.3% in two studies of the review among members evaluated for one year. Same staff had indexes of 26.8% of leaving work for at least one day. In addition, chronic pain episodes were reported in 18.1% of study respondents, leaving work because of medical treatment for disease was reported by 34.3% of workers interviewed.(2222. Abolfotouh SM, Mahmoud K, Faraj K, Moammer G, ElSayed A, Abolfotouh MA. Prevalence, consequences and predictors of low back pain among nurses in a tertiary care setting. Int Orthop. 2015; 39(12):2439-49.)

On the other hand, technical training programs related to immobilization of patients, such as strategies to prevent low back injuries, did not present scientific evidence related to their effectiveness. In addition, other musculoskeletal disorders in different parts of the body were associated with individual characteristics, such as sex, age, body mass index, presence of other diseases and lack of regular exercise.(2323. Ribeiro T, Serranheira F, Loureiro H. Work related musculoskeletal disorders in primary health care nurses. Appl Nurs Res. 2017; 33:72-7.)

Another contributing factors for absenteeism among nursing professionals identified in our review was the burnout syndrome,(2424. Olivares-Faúndez VE, Gil-Monte PR, Mena L, Jélvez-Wilke C, Figueiredo-Ferraz H. Relationships between burnout and role ambiguity, role conflict and employee absenteeism among health workers. Ter Psicol. 2014; 32(2):111-20.) which in the literature is attributed to absenteeism; this was investigated in 7.36% of studies. However, burnout was not confirmed as the reason for absenteeism but as the consequence of conflicts of roles. Psychological and mental health aspects(2525. Tei-Tominaga M, Asakura T, Asakura K. Stigma towards nurses with mental illnesses: A study of nurses and nurse managers in hospitals in Japan. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2014; 23(4):316-25.) were reported by 10.26% of studies and influence of job satisfaction(2626. Roelen CA, Magerøy N, Van Rhenen W, Groothoff JW, van der Klink JJ, Pallesen, et al. Low job satisfaction does not identify nurses at risk of future sickness absence: Results from a Norwegian cohort study. Int J Nurs Stud. 50(3):366-73.) was evaluated in 5.13% of studies; other reasons for absenteeism reported in the literature, such as bullying at work(2727. Carter M, Thompson N, Crampton P, Morrow G, Burford B, Gray C, Illing J. Workplace bullying in the UK NHS: a questionnaire and interview study on prevalence, impact and barriers to reporting. BMJ Open. 2017; 3(6):e002628.) and fatigue,(2828. Roelen CA, Bültmann U, Groothoff J, van Rhenen W, Magerøy N, Moen BE, Pallesen S, Bjorvatn B. Physical and mental fatigue as predictors of sickness absence among Norwegian nurses. Res Nurs Health; 2013; 36(5):453-65.) made up 2.56% of studies.

Finally, in relation to the cost-benefit about investments for preventing absenteeism identified an estimated return between €5 and €11 for each euro invested.(2929. Noben C, Evers SI, Nieuwenhuijsen K, Ketelaar S, Gärtner F, Sluiter J, Smit F. Protecting and promoting mental health of nurses in the hospital setting: is it cost-effective from an employer's perspective. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2015; 28(5):891-900.) The knowledge of obstacles and interventions used to reduce them can enable significant reduction in absence days, but they are not enough to reduce the number of episodes of absenteeism.(3030. Gaudine A, Saks AM, Dawe D, Beaton M. Effects of absenteeism feedback and goa-setting interventions on nurses’ fairness perceptions, discomfort feelings and absenteeism. J Nurs Manag. 2013; 21(3):591-602.)

Limitations of the selected studies include exhaustive statistical models and specific approaches that are limited to one reason or set of pre-established contributing factors by the researcher. A set of elements because of its diversity does not enable proposal of efficient management if premises of study would be directed to a supposed single cause; the best solution is to replicate successful cases. Questions have arisen concerning validity or even the possibility of transference of results of interventions to support real applications.

These distortions do not permit more precise understanding of the nature, behavior, organization process, order, precedence and influence, and detailed causes and cannot reveal variables with higher prevalence or even intervention costs needed to elaborate strategies for management with the aim to neutralize occurrence of absenteeism among nurses in hospital environment.

Conclusion

Most text fragments analyzed led us to conclude that studies identified individual factors as the reason for absenteeism. The interdependence between contributing factor for absenteeism, even when they are convergent points of other contributing elements, also represented 11% of studies. This review identified absenteeism under the influence of independent variables as the origin of macro dimensions (organization) and micro dimensions (interpersonal, individual or local), as well as employee turnover, stress, burnout, overwork, bullying, satisfaction with work and work environment. In practice, influence mechanisms (interrelations) as well as contributing factors would be appreciated by a single, ergonomic and participative approach by using as support one of the multiple criteria decisions methods based on ability to identify, operationalize and measure criteria that represent perceptions developed when transforming qualitative approach into a quantitative one.

Referências

  • 1
    Damart S, Kletz F. When the management of nurse absenteeism becomes a cause of absenteeism: a study based on a comparison of two health care facilities. J Nurs Manag. 2016; 24(1):4-11.
  • 2
    O'brien-Pallas Li, Murphy GT, Shamian J, Li X, Hayes LJ. Impact and determinants of nurse turnover: a pan-Canadian study. J Nurs Manag. 2010; 18(8):1073-86.
  • 3
    McGahan M, Kucharski G, Coyer F, Paper WA. Nurse staffing levels and the incidence of mortality and morbidity in the adult intensive care unit: a literature review. Aust Crit Care. 2012; 25(2):64-77.
  • 4
    Martins MM, Fernandes CS, Takase Gonçalves LH. [The family as the focus of nursing care in the hospital environment: an educational program]. Rev Bras Enferm. 2012; 65(4). Portuguese.
  • 5
    Daouk-Öyry L, Anouze AL, Otaki F, Dumit NY, Osman I. The JOINT model of nurse absenteeism and turnover: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014; 51(1):93-110.
  • 6
    Blanca-Gutiérrez JJ, del Carmen Jiménez-Díaz M, Escalera-Franco LF. [Effective interventions to reduce absenteeism among hospital nurses]. Gac Sanit. 2013; 27(6):545-51. Spanish.
  • 7
    Ferreira RC, Griep RH, Fonseca MD, Rotenberg L. [A multifactorial approach to sickness absenteeism among nursing staff]. Rev Saude Publica. 2010; 46(2):259-68. Portuguese.
  • 8
    Mendes KD, Silveira RC, Galvão CM. [Integrative literature review: a research method to incorporate evidence in health care and nursing]. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2008; 17(4):758-64. Portuguese.
  • 9
    Cooper HM. Scientific guidelines for conducting integrative research reviews. Rev Educ Res.1982; 52(2):291-302.
  • 10
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg. 2010; 8(5):336-41.
  • 11
    Adriaenssens J, De Gucht V, Maes S. Determinants and prevalence of burnout in emergency nurses: a systematic review of 25 years of research. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015; 52(2):649-61.
  • 12
    Aiken LH, Cimiotti JP, Sloane DM, Smith HL, Flynn L, Neff DF. The effects of nurse staffing and nurse education on patient deaths in hospitals with different nurse work environments. Med care. 2011; 49(12):1047.
  • 13
    Krane L, Larsen EL, Nielsen CV, Stapelfeldt CM, Johnsen R, Risør MB. Attitudes towards sickness absence and sickness presenteeism in health and care sectors in Norway and Denmark: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2014; 14(1):880.
  • 14
    Bernstrøm VH, Kjekshus LE. Effect of organisational change type and frequency on long-term sickness absence in hospitals. J Nurs Manag. 2015; 23(6):813-22.
  • 15
    Peters V, Engels JA, de Rijk AE, Nijhuis FJ. Sustainable employability in shiftwork: related to types of work schedule rather than age. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2015; 88(7):881-93.
  • 16
    Atinga RA, Domfeh KA, Kayi E, Abuosi A, Dzansi G. Effects of perceived workplace politics in hospitals on nurses’ behavioural intentions in Ghana. J Nurs Manag. 2014; 22(2):159-69.
  • 17
    Omar K, Anuar MM, Salleh AM. Career plateauing: is it still a matter of concern? Medit J Soc Scienc. 2014; 5(7):224-30.
  • 18
    Belita A, Mbindyo P, English M. Absenteeism amongst health workers-developing a typology to support empiric work in low-income countries and characterizing reported associations. Hum Res Health. 2013; 11(1):34.
  • 19
    Lamont S, Brunero S, Perry L, Duffield C, Sibbritt D, Gallagher R, Nicholls R. Mental health day'sickness absence amongst nurses and midwives: workplace, workforce, psychosocial and health characteristics. J Adv Nurs. 2017; 73(5):1172-81.
  • 20
    Mudaly P, Nkosi ZZ. Factors influencing nurse absenteeism in a general hospital in Durban, South Africa. J Nurs Manag. 2015; 23(5):623-31. Portuguese.
  • 21
    Grataloup M, Massardier-Pilonchéry A, Bergeret A, Fassier JB. Job Restrictions for healthcare workers with musculoskeletal disorders: consequences from the superior's viewpoint. J Occup Rehabil. 2016; 26(3):245-52.
  • 22
    Abolfotouh SM, Mahmoud K, Faraj K, Moammer G, ElSayed A, Abolfotouh MA. Prevalence, consequences and predictors of low back pain among nurses in a tertiary care setting. Int Orthop. 2015; 39(12):2439-49.
  • 23
    Ribeiro T, Serranheira F, Loureiro H. Work related musculoskeletal disorders in primary health care nurses. Appl Nurs Res. 2017; 33:72-7.
  • 24
    Olivares-Faúndez VE, Gil-Monte PR, Mena L, Jélvez-Wilke C, Figueiredo-Ferraz H. Relationships between burnout and role ambiguity, role conflict and employee absenteeism among health workers. Ter Psicol. 2014; 32(2):111-20.
  • 25
    Tei-Tominaga M, Asakura T, Asakura K. Stigma towards nurses with mental illnesses: A study of nurses and nurse managers in hospitals in Japan. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2014; 23(4):316-25.
  • 26
    Roelen CA, Magerøy N, Van Rhenen W, Groothoff JW, van der Klink JJ, Pallesen, et al. Low job satisfaction does not identify nurses at risk of future sickness absence: Results from a Norwegian cohort study. Int J Nurs Stud. 50(3):366-73.
  • 27
    Carter M, Thompson N, Crampton P, Morrow G, Burford B, Gray C, Illing J. Workplace bullying in the UK NHS: a questionnaire and interview study on prevalence, impact and barriers to reporting. BMJ Open. 2017; 3(6):e002628.
  • 28
    Roelen CA, Bültmann U, Groothoff J, van Rhenen W, Magerøy N, Moen BE, Pallesen S, Bjorvatn B. Physical and mental fatigue as predictors of sickness absence among Norwegian nurses. Res Nurs Health; 2013; 36(5):453-65.
  • 29
    Noben C, Evers SI, Nieuwenhuijsen K, Ketelaar S, Gärtner F, Sluiter J, Smit F. Protecting and promoting mental health of nurses in the hospital setting: is it cost-effective from an employer's perspective. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2015; 28(5):891-900.
  • 30
    Gaudine A, Saks AM, Dawe D, Beaton M. Effects of absenteeism feedback and goa-setting interventions on nurses’ fairness perceptions, discomfort feelings and absenteeism. J Nurs Manag. 2013; 21(3):591-602.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    Sep-Oct 2017

History

  • Received
    11 Sept 2017
  • Accepted
    30 Oct 2017
Escola Paulista de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de São Paulo R. Napoleão de Barros, 754, 04024-002 São Paulo - SP/Brasil, Tel./Fax: (55 11) 5576 4430 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: actapaulista@unifesp.br