Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Robotic-assisted repair of colovesical anastomosis after Hartmann’s reversal procedure

ABSTRACT

Purpose

Hartmann’s procedure is the resection of the rectosigmoid colon with an end colostomy formation and closure of the anorectal stump (11. Sotelo R, Medina LG, Husain FZ, Khazaeli M, Nikkhou K, Cacciamani GE, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic repair of rectovesical fistula after Hartmann’s reversal procedure. J Robot Surg. 2019;13:339-43.). Its reversal has a morbidity rate up to 58% (22. Mirza KL, Wickham CJ, Noren ER, Hwang GS, Ault GT, Ortega AE, et al. Outcomes of colostomy takedown following Hartmann’s procedure: successful restoration of continuity comes with a high risk of morbidity. Colorectal Dis. 2021;23:967-74., 33. Hallam S, Mothe BS, Tirumulaju R. Hartmann’s procedure, reversal and rate of stoma-free survival. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018;100:301-7.nt of Male Urethral Stricture Disease. Eur Urol. 2021;80:190-200.) with an incidence of fistulae formation of 4.08% (11. Sotelo R, Medina LG, Husain FZ, Khazaeli M, Nikkhou K, Cacciamani GE, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic repair of rectovesical fistula after Hartmann’s reversal procedure. J Robot Surg. 2019;13:339-43.). Herein, we present a robotic-assisted repair of a complex fistula that occurred as complication of Hartmann’s reversal when the stapler was introduced inadvertently through the vaginal canal.

Patient and methods

Eighty-three-year-old female with past medical history of hysterectomy and ischemic colitis that required colectomy and colostomy placement in December 2020. In March 2022, the patient underwent a colostomy takedown, after which she reported fecaluria, urine leakage per vagina, and recurrent urinary tract infections. Cystoscopy and vaginoscopy revealed a large colovesical fistula, a staple in the bladder trigone, and several staples in the anterior vaginal wall. Robotically, extensive adhesiolysis was performed, the sigmoid was separated from the bladder, and the intact rectal stump was dissected free. The staple from the bladder trigone was removed. Bladder was closed in two layers with 3-0 V-Loc. Colorectal anastomosis was not feasible due to the short length of both ends. Therefore, a permanent colostomy was placed.

Results

Operative time was 454min., and estimated blood loss was 100cc. Discharged on postoperative day 4 with a JP drain and a 20Fr Foley catheter. Drain, and Foley were removed on postoperative days 9 and 23, respectively. No postoperative complications were reported.

Conclusion

Robotic-assisted repair represents an effective approach for the management of colovesical fistulae after Hartmann’s reversal.

Figure 1
Colovesical and Vesicovaginal fistulae.

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Sotelo R, Medina LG, Husain FZ, Khazaeli M, Nikkhou K, Cacciamani GE, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic repair of rectovesical fistula after Hartmann’s reversal procedure. J Robot Surg. 2019;13:339-43.
  • 2
    Mirza KL, Wickham CJ, Noren ER, Hwang GS, Ault GT, Ortega AE, et al. Outcomes of colostomy takedown following Hartmann’s procedure: successful restoration of continuity comes with a high risk of morbidity. Colorectal Dis. 2021;23:967-74.
  • 3
    Hallam S, Mothe BS, Tirumulaju R. Hartmann’s procedure, reversal and rate of stoma-free survival. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018;100:301-7.nt of Male Urethral Stricture Disease. Eur Urol. 2021;80:190-200.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    09 June 2023
  • Date of issue
    Mar-Apr 2023

History

  • Received
    06 Sept 2022
  • Accepted
    15 Sept 2022
  • Published
    30 Nov 2022
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia Rua Bambina, 153, 22251-050 Rio de Janeiro RJ Brazil, Tel. +55 21 2539-6787, Fax: +55 21 2246-4088 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil
E-mail: brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br