Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Next generation in ultrasound imaging to assess upper airway

Keywords
Anesthesia; Airway management; Difficult laryngoscopy; 3D/4D images; Ultrasonography

Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) is well established in anesthetic practice but underused for and during airway management. In addition to 2D images, three/four Dimensional (3D/4D) ultrasound technology provides clearer and more accurate imaging for airway, and additional visual information to diagnose potential pathological conditions more efficiently.11 Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Connis RT, et al. 2022 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology. 2022; 136:31-81. Moreover, POCUS facilitates rapid screening for possible difficult laryngoscopy22 Sotoodehnia M, Rafiemanesh H, Mirfazaelian H, Safaie A, Baratloo A. Ultrasonography indicators for predicting difficult intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Emerg Med. 2021;21:76. and identification of the cricothyroid membrane.33 Austin DR, Chang MG, Bittner EA. Use of handheld point-of-care ultrasound in emergency airway management. Chest. 2021: 159. We present a complete four-step upper airway assessment in 2D (Column 1) images and the correspondence with 3D/4D images (Column 2), and the position for ultrasound probe (Column 3).

Figure 1 shows four-step measurements of ultrasound parameters that assess upper airway anatomy suggesting difficult laryngoscopy. Picture 1a and 1b corresponds to Hyomental Distance (HMD) in Midline Sagittal Plane (MSP); Picture 2a and 2b is the Distance from Skin to Hyoid bone (DSH) in Transversely Plane (TP); Picture 3a and 3b shows the Distance from Skin to Epiglottis (DSE) in TP; Picture 4a and 4b displays the Distance from Skin to Vocal Cords (DSVC) in TP.

Figure 1
Four-step measurements of ultrasound parameters that assess upper airway anatomy suggesting difficult laryngoscopy. Column 1: 2D images; Column 2: 3D/4D images. Gained from a Voluson Swift ultrasound machine and a Convex Array Volume Probe (GE; Little Chalfont, UK). QR available. Picture 1a/b Midline sagittal scan of Hyomental Distance (HMD); Hyoid bone; Mandible; Genioglossus muscle; Palate; Mylohyoid Muscle (MH) and Geniohyoid Muscle (GH). Picture 2a/b transverse midline scan of Distance from Skin to hyoid bone (DSH) and Hyoid bone. Picture 3a/b transverse midline scan of Distance from Skin to Epiglottis (DSE); Pre-Epiglottic Space (PRE-E); Epiglottis and Air-Mucosa interface (A-M). Picture 4a/b transverse midline scan of Distance from Skin to Vocal Cords (DSVC); Anterior Commissure (AC); True Cords (TC); False Cords (FC); Arytenoids and Thyroid cartilage. Picture 5 the position of the ultrasound probe for pictures 1-2-3-4 respectively.

Figure 2 shows four-step tracheal structures to identify the cricothyroid membrane. Pictures 1a and 1b corresponds to Cricoid cartilage in TP; Pictures 2a and 2b, to tracheal rings in TP; Pictures 3a and 3b, to Cricoid cartilage and tracheal rings in MSP and Pictures 4a and 4b, to cricothyroid membrane in MSP.

Figure 2
Four-step tracheal structures to identify the cricothyroid membrane. Column 1: 2D images; Column 2. 3D/4D images. Gained from a Voluson Swift ultrasound machine and a Convex Array Volume Probe (GE; Little Chalfont, UK). QR available. Picture 1a/b transverse midline scan of Cricoid cartilage. Picture 2a/b transverse midline scan of a tracheal ring; Airway and Air-Mucosa interface (A-M). Picture 3a/b midline sagittal scan of Cricoid cartilage; Tracheal rings and airway. Picture 4a/b midline sagittal scan of Thyroid Cartilage (Thyroid C.); Cricothyroid Membrane (C-T Membrane); Cricoid cartilage (Cricoid C.); Airway and Air-Mucosa interface (A-M). Picture 5 the position of the ultrasound probe for pictures 1-2-3-4 respectively.

Presentation

The images have been accepted for presentation at Euroanaesthesia (June 2022 Milan, Italy), the annual conference of ESAIC (European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care).

Acknowledgements

EDC is Editor in Chief at the Journal of Pain Management and Therapy and CEO/Founder at Advanced Pain & Gynecology Research International Center (CIMEG), Madrid. RG is Board Member and Treasurer of the European Airway Management Society (EAMS).

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.bjane.2022.05.008.

References

  • 1
    Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Connis RT, et al. 2022 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology. 2022; 136:31-81.
  • 2
    Sotoodehnia M, Rafiemanesh H, Mirfazaelian H, Safaie A, Baratloo A. Ultrasonography indicators for predicting difficult intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Emerg Med. 2021;21:76.
  • 3
    Austin DR, Chang MG, Bittner EA. Use of handheld point-of-care ultrasound in emergency airway management. Chest. 2021: 159.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    10 Oct 2022
  • Date of issue
    Sep-Oct 2022

History

  • Received
    10 May 2022
  • Accepted
    30 May 2022
  • Published
    15 June 2022
Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA) Rua Professor Alfredo Gomes, 36, Botafogo , cep: 22251-080 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ / Brasil , tel: +55 (21) 97977-0024 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil
E-mail: editor.bjan@sbahq.org